Keep in mind, this lighting was used so that you could see the ship clearly. Hopefully if I can get these overheating issues solved I can make the ANTR video HD
@@skythenoob7848Yup. According to them when it splits, it’s at a 45 degree angle. According to studies, the most accurate one or correct one is at a 23 degree angle when it splits.
THIS IS SO ACCURATE expet for the stern reaching over 90° when it should be like 89° or somethin like that.
The stern should be at 90. The only time you see it at 89 is when it is at a Dutch angle, then the stern becomes 90 again.
Goes to show just how weird the sinking sequence in the movie was
1:14
First funnel collapses.
To this day I still don't understand what made Cameron think a ship's stern can go that high.
Breaking at high angle
Keep in mind, this lighting was used so that you could see the ship clearly. Hopefully if I can get these overheating issues solved I can make the ANTR video HD
This is not how the Titanic sank.
this is the 1995 theory used for the 1997 movie, but this animation is innacurate
@@skythenoob7848Yup. According to them when it splits, it’s at a 45 degree angle. According to studies, the most accurate one or correct one is at a 23 degree angle when it splits.
Yeah I know. Did you not read the title of the video? XD
The point of this animation wasn’t to remake the 1995 theory. It was to remake the sinking in the actual movie as best as possible.
While also linking it up with the actual movie, what you see in the video is exactly how the ship would have been in the movie