Note: The MicroLED realistically has much more than 10,000:1 contrast. More like infinite due to the LEDs being turned off. They also told me that the brightness was turned down to 30% when we filmed because it was insanely bright. Would have made filming my face next to them virtually impossible. Check out & order the Upgradable AWALL MicroLED TV Today ➡ awallvision.com/
I need this as a multi monitor setup Imagine 1 monitor that can be 3 when you want to multitask or 1 giant monitor when you watch a movie. This is the future of display tech!
Not to mention it’s only for the biggest baddest model; the lowest-end version is just $8k (yeah *just,* but considering this is MicroLED, the “ultimate TV type”, that’s impressive
@@TheMamaluigi3008k for micro-led is absolutely insane. A year ago this was unthinkable. We might actually be just a few years away from these being affordable for a normal person. Id save up and pay 5k for a 77 or 83 inch micro led TV.
People love to talk being modular tech but then the company never invests in a true upgrade path. Aside from PC there aren’t many tech related devices out there where you can buy something and easily upgrade it. I’d love to say start with a 75 inch tv then each year make it 85 then 95 and so on until it’s big as possible vs upgrading the whole TV. I love the idea of say buying a smaller Micro LED TV and then each time you have the extra cash you upgrade via a handful of more modules but often those plans are abandoned. Don’t get me wrong I’d love to see plug and play modular electronics but often companies move onto something else and leave those early adopters in the cold. Fingers crossed this tech and modular upgradable tech happens.
Wtf? I can’t believe it’s finally here. I love that it is not one big panel that’s incredible because everything breaks eventually. My only concern is will next years panel have a faster chip or brighter and when I am finally able to afford to expand it each year up to 110 over 3-4 years will those panels still all work seamlessly together. I’d love to get into this game even if it means 4 years of a process to grow it. And what’s the warranty? How old is this company?
My understanding is that Valerion is a sister company to AWOL Vision. With the Valerion Pro Max projector they have really disrupted the market. I see no reason why the AWALL won’t do a similar thing for people in the market for flat TV like 80” plus screens.
Dude this is by far the best tv I have seen at CES, the suction cup tv is epic but this is way better. You know this will get cheaper as the tech gets better
Yes those are some amazing prices compared Samsung and Sony and LG, 10 Grand for an 81 inch you beat and 75 inches for 8 grand that's amazing gives us guys a chance in a few years to buy one of these for maybe 5 grand maybe .
I feel like "modular prices" shouldn't just be for TVs, but power consumption, too. Especially when gpus sap away a lot of power and costs a lot of money.
What the heck I literally don't see the edges, and how did they make it 20% the price, it's black magic straight out of Fahrenheit 451, and BttF 2. If this price went to Desktop monitors, we'd have it universally in a few years no question about it. I can not begin to express my respect for their modular design, it lets people expand their purchases in the future by being a repeat customer, and lets them be environmentally friendly if a panel breaks or even if future displays can be placed in the same configuration, a win win for everyone.
It's great it covers the wall and looks impressive but where on earth are you supposed to stick your speakers.. are people putting centre channels on the floor and expecting good audio?
Under 50k That’s a huge deal! You’re talking about something that’s as good as a home IMAX or Dolby cinema projector, which cost over a 1 million dollars for $50,000. I thought when they got it down to $250,000 that was already a big jump, by comparison.
Love this Channel, he always does his homework, how does he find these gems?? Best thing I’ve seen come out of CES 2025, they broke the price barrier and the big boys couldn’t. 135” to replace my 30k projector.
What is the resolution of each size? They only discuss pixel pitch on their website. Looks like no Dolby vision. Also what’s the HDMI inputs? Can you game on it and what FPS? They talk about an ungodly high HZ but that seems like not real world.
@ so with the 135 inch screen I wont notice any sharpness difference watching a 4k content compared to a 4k laser tv correct ? Awall says the 135inch one has a resolution of 3200x1800 with 0.9 pixel pitch
@@eazy1437 With Micro LED technology, 4K resolution is not as crucial as it might be with traditional LED or OLED displays for several reasons: 1 Pixel Density: Micro LED displays have incredibly small, individually addressable LEDs, which allow for extremely high pixel densities. This means that even at larger screen sizes, the image can remain sharp and detailed without needing to rely on 4K resolution. The technology inherently supports high levels of clarity, which can make the difference between a 4K and non-4K display less noticeable, especially in larger screens. 2 Scalability: Micro LED technology is modular, meaning it can be scaled up without losing image quality. The system can be composed of smaller panels that are individually calibrated and can create high-resolution images without the need for a fixed 4K matrix across the entire display. 3 Superior Brightness and Contrast: Micro LED displays offer excellent brightness and contrast ratios because each pixel is self-emissive (like OLED), which gives them better overall image quality. The clarity and depth of the image often make the resolution difference less significant. 4 Viewing Distance: At typical viewing distances, the pixel density of Micro LED displays can be high enough that 4K resolution becomes less noticeable, especially on larger screens where the pixel density still remains sufficient for sharp detail. 5 High Dynamic Range (HDR) and Color Accuracy: Micro LED technology can excel in color accuracy and HDR performance, which can contribute more to the perceived image quality than resolution alone. As a result, a display with excellent HDR and color performance can look just as good as, if not better than, a traditional 4K display. In summary, while 4K can still be beneficial, Micro LED's inherent strengths, such as high pixel density, brightness, and contrast, make it less reliant on resolution to deliver superior image quality.
I have been waiting for this moment! I wonder if they could do a cinemascope display that is 165" wide but includes a full 4K 16x9 section in the middle?
Because if they slow-walk it, they can produce a 60Hz version for ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$). then a 60Hz version for ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$). then a 60Hz version for ($$$$$$$$$), then a a 120Hz version for ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$), while the 60Hz version becomes affordable and the process repeats.
@@thisApex3D the largest oleds also always cost 20k+. And those are just close to 100". 50k for 162" is a great deal especially considering the picture quality is unmatched.
If a display technology that surpasses OLED in every single way becomes mainstream, we will benefit from the lack of burn in and brighter images. Competition gives us better options for quality and price. I am all for it.
Their native contrast is 10,000 to 1 the Dynamic Contrast is infinite. You can even compare a Micro to an Oled. Micro's have millions of light omitting LED's with true black, no back light, no glare, no burn in, no viewing angle restrictions etc, the Multiview is awesome and now the price is right!
@@homemediapatrol3784 so its like win win , and best of all worlds., if priced right., i would love too see wall filled with these in near future. Thank you.
@@homemediapatrol3784 looks like 'barney stinson' from 'How i met your mother' sitcom had something like this in his living room, in one of the episodes he said 300inch TV.
we need small companies to take down these giants who inflates prices and hold back consumer tech, this is the future of tv's. once these panels reach affordable like 100" for 2k ,im in. until im fine with my 4klaser projector
@@yonkocommander5531 What does the competition have to do with it? $8000 is not an affordable price for a TV for most people. You can buy an exotic car for 1 million and and one for $200,000, that doesn't mean the $200k version is "affordable"
@@homosapien6031 The fact of the matter is most middle class *can't* afford an $8k tv I payed around $4k CDN. Most people I know make 6 figures and all my friends said I was nuts paying as much as I did for my tv. You may be able to afford it but in general, $8k TV's aren't middle class affordable. I didn't exactly do a scientific study but literally all of my friends thought I payed double what I should have for a TV, now imagine what all these 6 figure people would think of an $8k TV, in US dollars no less so that's over $10k Canadian, for that much I'd want a lot more from that TV than just watching content.
You'll never upgrade, a couple of years later, if not months, modules won't be available, and if they are, will have different luminosity versus the others that had been worked for hours, making them highly noticeable
Their company rep mentioned that they will keep enough individual panels in stock to supply demand and the processor will calibrate all COB displays to be consistent. They last 100,000 hours
What happened to the cheap oled displays, it is a printing technology where they use printers to make the oldest and it was supposed to get super cheap.
Many of the competitor’s Micro LED can get significantly brighter than 1000 nits. Also, if you want 4K resolution, you’re going to need more than that 70 something inch one.
The importance of 4K resolution is less emphasized when it comes to MicroLED technology for several reasons: Pixel Density and Size: MicroLED displays use tiny, self-emitting LEDs that allow for incredibly high pixel densities, especially at larger screen sizes. As the pixel density increases, the difference between 1080p and 4K becomes less noticeable to the human eye, especially when sitting at a typical viewing distance. Superior Contrast and Brightness: MicroLED displays can achieve exceptional contrast ratios and brightness levels due to their ability to control each pixel independently (similar to OLED). These features can enhance the viewing experience so much that the need for higher resolution (like 4K) becomes less critical compared to the visual improvements in color accuracy, brightness, and black levels. Scalability and Flexibility: MicroLED technology is more scalable than traditional OLED or LCD panels, meaning that it can easily be produced in various sizes, including very large screens. At larger sizes, the visual impact of 4K resolution diminishes, as the individual pixels become smaller and harder to distinguish from normal viewing distances. In summary, MicroLED’s advantages in terms of pixel density, contrast, brightness, and flexibility make 4K less of a defining factor for its appeal, especially when compared to traditional display technologies.
@ You’re only fooling yourself. Do you even know what pixel density is? The biggest drawback for Micro LED is the ability to increase Pixel Density. It’s very hard and expensive to make smaller screen sizes. This is why they are done modularly, because it’s harder to increase pixel density. Also, this Micro LED, from this company, is nowhere near as bright as the competitors, which can do 10,000 nits of brightness. Not everyone can fit a 100 + inch display in their home. Unless they can reduce the size and increase the pixel density, to be able to cater to mass consumers, this will not be a mass-consumer product. The biggest hurdles are the costs of manufacturing and the ability to increase pixel density. You’re confusing larger size as somehow relating to larger pixel density. A 100-inch 4K display has less pixel density than a 55-inch 4K display. You keep talking about viewing distance, which is true, but most people do not have the room to view a 100 + inch display at normal distance, hence they will be able to see the pixelation from the lack of pixel density, because they will be sitting far too close.
@ You’re one of those fools that keep downplaying the importance of brightness. Do you realize that, even on a cloudy day, the amount of light in that environment is still significantly brighter than 1000 nits? The entire point of having perfect black levels is create room for contrast. HDR displays are simply trying to more realistically display what our own eyes can see. What’s the point of investing in In-organic emitting diodes that can be significantly brighter than organic ones, when you limit it to only 1000 nits of brightness? Many OLED displays can already emit more than 1000 nits of brightness, in peak 3 - 10 percent windows. On smaller displays, they can even emit over 1000 nits of full-screen brightness. Micro-LED can get significantly brighter, so don’t try and defend Micro-LED’s shortcomings by saying 1000 nits of brightness is perfect, because that’s downplaying the entire point of Micro-LED.
It is not $14,990, the 162” model cost $31.5k… that said imo the price is acceptable for what it offers, hopefully in a few years we can get one for 1/3 of the price and THAT will be affordable.
Micro LEDs are expensive primarily because of the following factors: 1. **Manufacturing Complexity**: Producing micro LEDs requires precise and intricate processes. Each micro LED is minuscule (often smaller than 100 micrometers), and placing millions or even billions of them onto a display panel with accuracy is highly challenging. The technology involved in the mass transfer and bonding of these tiny LEDs is still developing, and achieving the necessary precision is costly. 2. **Material Costs**: Micro LEDs are typically made from high-quality materials like gallium nitride (GaN) and sapphire, which are expensive. Additionally, the materials used in micro LED displays must be carefully processed to ensure consistent brightness, color accuracy, and longevity. 3. **Yield Rates**: Due to the small size of each LED and the complex manufacturing processes, achieving a high yield of functional micro LEDs is difficult. The lower the yield, the more expensive it becomes to produce large, defect-free panels, as defective micro LEDs must be discarded or replaced. 4. **Limited Production Scale**: As of now, micro LED technology is still emerging and not produced at the same scale as other display technologies like OLED or LCD. Limited production runs lead to higher per-unit costs. 5. **Advanced Equipment**: The equipment required to manufacture micro LEDs, such as specialized wafer bonding tools and alignment systems, is highly advanced and costly. 6. **Research and Development**: Since micro LED technology is still in its early stages compared to more established display technologies, manufacturers invest heavily in R&D. These costs are often passed on to consumers. As the technology matures, production scales up, and yields improve, the price of micro LEDs is expected to drop. But for now, these factors contribute to their high cost.
so? LG has an 8K 272-inch Micro LED for several years. the Chinese only know how to copy other manufacturers and steal patents from other manufacturers, that's why most of those copied Chinese products will not be sold outside of China, due to patent rights.
You would never use 10,000 nits indoors. It’s COB tech and it’s better quality than the competition. Did you see the wafer display when he removed it? Did the images look bad to you? It looked amazing, every influencer that actually saw it says it’s as good as the competition. Go buy the Samsung 145 for $240k, I’ll take the 162” AWALL for 49k.
@@aprozsolt8046it’s 10,000 to 1 native, but infinite while watching certain contrast. These guys are lowering the price, being honest with all specs and offering an array of sizes and pixel pitch, and your complaing?
@@jaychannel8558 what is the purpose of a 10000:1 contrast ratio tv with 1000 nits brightness with that price ? These are inferior numbers next to todays oled and miniled tvs.
@@aprozsolt8046Micros have millions of LED bulbs in them, 81” has 5.7 million. These LEDs are infused in the outside of the panel. It is the pinnacle of tv tech. Their specs are perfect for the home. No glare, no burn, 180 viewing angle, not backlight, over 100 rec 20/20, expandable, last 100,000 hours, replaceable 8” display. It looks as though they spec it for the home. Very smart to do to make it affordable. In my opinion the displays in this video look brighter and have more contrast, than the oled qled. Oh, I forget up to 6 multiviiew sources. You’re stuck in the past, comparing apples to oranges. It’s like saying a projector has 10,000 nits, is it going to look like a 10,000 nit OLED? Their rep said they turned down the brightness to 30% because it was too bright for the room.
So true. It's like saying that exotic car only costs $200,000 and because competitors are selling them for $500,000 that some how makes the $200,000 car "affordable" $7990 US is not affordable for a TV for most people.
This is absurdly cheap compared to the competition. Makes me feel they might actually get somewhat affordable in the next few years. Micro-led is the endgame for displays. This isnt even a rich person's tv. This is the first time at tv is available for a middle class enthusiast
@@veilmontTV LOL maybe read what @dovan4092 wrote to get the point of my comment. "compared to the competition" is entirely irrelevant if $7990 US makes the TV just as out of reach as it would be at 10 times that price right now. I'm middle class and bought the Sony A95L last week. Literally every one I know thinks I'm out of my mind spending what I did for my TV that isn't half the price of this TV and these people all make 6 figures and still think I paid too much for a TV.
you're talking nonsense, making micro leds is inexpensive, they are still in development, not yet mature, but the current demand on the market is very low, so very expensive in 7 years, that will be the price of a led screen today.
The reason market demand has been low was because the prices were astronomical. This is the first brand that is managing to lower prices by 5x compared to their competitors.
Dude this is by far the best tv I have seen at CES, the suction cup tv is epic but this is way better. You know this will get cheaper as the tech gets better
Note: The MicroLED realistically has much more than 10,000:1 contrast. More like infinite due to the LEDs being turned off.
They also told me that the brightness was turned down to 30% when we filmed because it was insanely bright. Would have made filming my face next to them virtually impossible.
Check out & order the Upgradable AWALL MicroLED TV Today ➡ awallvision.com/
Yeah, you can’t beat the M4 Ipad Pro Tandem OLED value…
I need this as a multi monitor setup Imagine 1 monitor that can be 3 when you want to multitask or 1 giant monitor when you watch a movie. This is the future of display tech!
28,000 pixels per section doesn't seem to be very high resolution though.
way to resolution for use as a monitor
This is a revolution, unbelievable
if the price drops to around 3000- 5000 dollars for the size of 100 inch, I will buy one.
Yes $50,000 is expensive, but with comparable models running $250,000, this is an amazing reduction in price.
Well I guess I have to learn how to live a life with only one kidney.
Not to mention it’s only for the biggest baddest model; the lowest-end version is just $8k (yeah *just,* but considering this is MicroLED, the “ultimate TV type”, that’s impressive
@@TheMamaluigi3008k for micro-led is absolutely insane. A year ago this was unthinkable. We might actually be just a few years away from these being affordable for a normal person. Id save up and pay 5k for a 77 or 83 inch micro led TV.
For 163inch you must pay more then 400k from others company. Lg for 100inch micro led ask 250 000
One way to afford this tv and many other is to stop being poor.
I still remember the day I walked in Costco and saw a 40" plasma TV for $10,000.00 and now for a few hundreds of dollars...
You can get these Plasmas now for free.. Haha
People love to talk being modular tech but then the company never invests in a true upgrade path. Aside from PC there aren’t many tech related devices out there where you can buy something and easily upgrade it. I’d love to say start with a 75 inch tv then each year make it 85 then 95 and so on until it’s big as possible vs upgrading the whole TV.
I love the idea of say buying a smaller Micro LED TV and then each time you have the extra cash you upgrade via a handful of more modules but often those plans are abandoned. Don’t get me wrong I’d love to see plug and play modular electronics but often companies move onto something else and leave those early adopters in the cold. Fingers crossed this tech and modular upgradable tech happens.
You could buy a projector and each year move it a few more inches away from the wall then tell yourself that you now have a bigger screen.
@@bradleyeric14 Are you really comparing an projector to Micro-Led ?
These guys just fast forwarded the microLED TV segment by at least 5 years price scale wise.
I guess it's 1000 nits full field? Now THAT's performance
Wtf? I can’t believe it’s finally here. I love that it is not one big panel that’s incredible because everything breaks eventually. My only concern is will next years panel have a faster chip or brighter and when I am finally able to afford to expand it each year up to 110 over 3-4 years will those panels still all work seamlessly together. I’d love to get into this game even if it means 4 years of a process to grow it. And what’s the warranty? How old is this company?
My understanding is that Valerion is a sister company to AWOL Vision. With the Valerion Pro Max projector they have really disrupted the market. I see no reason why the AWALL won’t do a similar thing for people in the market for flat TV like 80” plus screens.
Dude this is by far the best tv I have seen at CES, the suction cup tv is epic but this is way better. You know this will get cheaper as the tech gets better
Yes those are some amazing prices compared Samsung and Sony and LG, 10 Grand for an 81 inch you beat and 75 inches for 8 grand that's amazing gives us guys a chance in a few years to buy one of these for maybe 5 grand maybe .
I feel like "modular prices" shouldn't just be for TVs, but power consumption, too. Especially when gpus sap away a lot of power and costs a lot of money.
Awall should sell modular pieces so we can make 32"-45" monitors out of them.
What the heck I literally don't see the edges, and how did they make it 20% the price, it's black magic straight out of Fahrenheit 451, and BttF 2. If this price went to Desktop monitors, we'd have it universally in a few years no question about it. I can not begin to express my respect for their modular design, it lets people expand their purchases in the future by being a repeat customer, and lets them be environmentally friendly if a panel breaks or even if future displays can be placed in the same configuration, a win win for everyone.
It's great it covers the wall and looks impressive but where on earth are you supposed to stick your speakers.. are people putting centre channels on the floor and expecting good audio?
So next year 3k for a 50"-60" 4k model?
This is something I would definitely spend on a pinnacle of a display technology.
Under 50k That’s a huge deal! You’re talking about something that’s as good as a home IMAX or Dolby cinema projector, which cost over a 1 million dollars for $50,000. I thought when they got it down to $250,000 that was already a big jump, by comparison.
Resolution??
Love this Channel, he always does his homework, how does he find these gems?? Best thing I’ve seen come out of CES 2025, they broke the price barrier and the big boys couldn’t. 135” to replace my 30k projector.
Would be cool if the tv took up a whole wall but had parts of the tv that opened up like hidden drawer.
What is the resolution of each size? They only discuss pixel pitch on their website. Looks like no Dolby vision. Also what’s the HDMI inputs? Can you game on it and what FPS? They talk about an ungodly high HZ but that seems like not real world.
But why 4K resolution only on 163 inch screen ?
Because with such a big TV it needs to be further away from you. You won't notice pixels
@ so with the 135 inch screen I wont notice any sharpness difference watching a 4k content compared to a 4k laser tv correct ? Awall says the 135inch one has a resolution of 3200x1800 with 0.9 pixel pitch
@@eazy1437 With Micro LED technology, 4K resolution is not as crucial as it might be with traditional LED or OLED displays for several reasons:
1 Pixel Density: Micro LED displays have incredibly small, individually addressable LEDs, which allow for extremely high pixel densities. This means that even at larger screen sizes, the image can remain sharp and detailed without needing to rely on 4K resolution. The technology inherently supports high levels of clarity, which can make the difference between a 4K and non-4K display less noticeable, especially in larger screens.
2 Scalability: Micro LED technology is modular, meaning it can be scaled up without losing image quality. The system can be composed of smaller panels that are individually calibrated and can create high-resolution images without the need for a fixed 4K matrix across the entire display.
3 Superior Brightness and Contrast: Micro LED displays offer excellent brightness and contrast ratios because each pixel is self-emissive (like OLED), which gives them better overall image quality. The clarity and depth of the image often make the resolution difference less significant.
4 Viewing Distance: At typical viewing distances, the pixel density of Micro LED displays can be high enough that 4K resolution becomes less noticeable, especially on larger screens where the pixel density still remains sufficient for sharp detail.
5 High Dynamic Range (HDR) and Color Accuracy: Micro LED technology can excel in color accuracy and HDR performance, which can contribute more to the perceived image quality than resolution alone. As a result, a display with excellent HDR and color performance can look just as good as, if not better than, a traditional 4K display.
In summary, while 4K can still be beneficial, Micro LED's inherent strengths, such as high pixel density, brightness, and contrast, make it less reliant on resolution to deliver superior image quality.
What is 108” cost? Have room for that. Would need remodeling to go bigger , future project
This is mindblowing.. What would be the smallest 16:9 configuration be? 2 Modules?
I have been waiting for this moment! I wonder if they could do a cinemascope display that is 165" wide but includes a full 4K 16x9 section in the middle?
Hi ! Are Micro LED TV panels going to USA ??
has anyone did a lag test on any of these?
Are there any that do high refresh or plan to do high refresh?
This would be great for a true home cinema. But the resolution is is rough. Only the full 162" is 4K
Bro got paid 14000 dollars for this fun video
How much did they pay in sponsorship?
Troll
@@jaychannel8558 That's not trolling. I was curious to know how much they paid as sponsors.
I'll wait until they drop substantially more in price over the years and upgrade when they do.
Is it possible to make it a curved display?
Why this technology is not RUSHING towards consumer market ? Microled have basically infinate Refresh Rate. Oled Black levels and crazy brightness
Because if they slow-walk it, they can produce a 60Hz version for ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$). then a 60Hz version for ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$). then a 60Hz version for ($$$$$$$$$), then a a 120Hz version for ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$), while the 60Hz version becomes affordable and the process repeats.
Wow I’m actually impressed it’s under 10,000 bucks wow
The resolution! Hello?
Микролед добьёт Олед и проекторы. :)
Yo MAX, my man.😊
I doubt it has 3800+ Hz refresh rate !! Does it support G-Sync or what ?
It’s in the specs, why do you doubt it?
This is really exciting news! I can't wait to be able to afford this technology!
No thank you, you would need 162” to get 4K which costs 50k USD and the best part is it will be only 60Hz… OLED it is
If you want a huge screen and have money that's a great option.
But yeah oled is the only reasonable choice for normal people.
@ yeah sure less expensive than before but still it is car or tv ball park…
@@thisApex3D the largest oleds also always cost 20k+. And those are just close to 100". 50k for 162" is a great deal especially considering the picture quality is unmatched.
Looks pretty cool.
The modular approach is pretty impressive. ;)
Thanks for showing it .
If a display technology that surpasses OLED in every single way becomes mainstream, we will benefit from the lack of burn in and brighter images. Competition gives us better options for quality and price. I am all for it.
TVs will be clearer than real life.
I can’t wait until we have at home 1.43:1 true imax.
Wonder how visible the gaps between each panel when look at close distance.
When you do a promo like this and you don’t talk about the elephant in the room it’s miss in my opinion.
They're like pixels in tv unless you're looking from point blank, You aren't gonna see any gaps
yeah it still needs to go down in price by 50 times before it's "for anyone to buy"
Can you do an install in South Africa
How come I can’t find them on google
For now, I'd get a 98" TCL and wait a few years for this new tech to mature and come down in price.
It just came down about 70%.
@@jaychannel8558 Space flight has come down by more than that. Doesn't make it affordable for most people.
This is which brand
AWOL Vision
@MaxTechOfficial thank you to your reply
How?
Well linus must be watching this 🤣
That's why everyone wants to come to US, where a product that costs as much as a car is considered AFFORDABLE!
It’s 80% less than the competition. That’s the point. It makes it more affordable for people that could not afford a $100,000 yo $200,000 TV.
contrast ratio 10000:1 is not enough, while oled has Inf : 1
needs more time and improvement.
Their native contrast is 10,000 to 1 the Dynamic Contrast is infinite. You can even compare a Micro to an Oled. Micro's have millions of light omitting LED's with true black, no back light, no glare, no burn in, no viewing angle restrictions etc, the Multiview is awesome and now the price is right!
@@homemediapatrol3784 so its like win win , and best of all worlds., if priced right., i would love too see wall filled with these in near future.
Thank you.
@@homemediapatrol3784 looks like 'barney stinson' from 'How i met your mother' sitcom had something like this in his living room, in one of the episodes he said 300inch TV.
We move closer to Fahrenheit 451 every year
Insane ✨
There’s gotta be a catch. $8k really isn’t bad as long as this TV is gonna last 10-15 years high-quality
we need small companies to take down these giants who inflates prices and hold back consumer tech, this is the future of tv's. once these panels reach affordable like 100" for 2k ,im in.
until im fine with my 4klaser projector
I will get an 165 inch once it drops to $5k
Why OLED technology can't built a modular TV too? 😮
Apple could buy this and make it even better
undercutters pizza
Vadim, excellent coverage.
Micro LED TV on layaway?😂
this is way too good to be true, where’s the catch?
The "catch" is it's still not affordable even if it's cheaper than competitors
@ it’s only $8000 have you seen the competition?
@@dosdontat $8k, my family can afford it, and we’re not rich
@@yonkocommander5531 What does the competition have to do with it? $8000 is not an affordable price for a TV for most people. You can buy an exotic car for 1 million and and one for $200,000, that doesn't mean the $200k version is "affordable"
@@homosapien6031 The fact of the matter is most middle class *can't* afford an $8k tv I payed around $4k CDN. Most people I know make 6 figures and all my friends said I was nuts paying as much as I did for my tv. You may be able to afford it but in general, $8k TV's aren't middle class affordable. I didn't exactly do a scientific study but literally all of my friends thought I payed double what I should have for a TV, now imagine what all these 6 figure people would think of an $8k TV, in US dollars no less so that's over $10k Canadian, for that much I'd want a lot more from that TV than just watching content.
MicroLED also has no bezels
Yep as you can see in the video. No bezels.
You'll never upgrade, a couple of years later, if not months, modules won't be available, and if they are, will have different luminosity versus the others that had been worked for hours, making them highly noticeable
Their company rep mentioned that they will keep enough individual panels in stock to supply demand and the processor will calibrate all COB displays to be consistent. They last 100,000 hours
Are there any other multiview tvs on the market? I'd love that functionality in a miniLED or OLED tv.
So puffy with a lack of stuffy. Did I miss the resolution per panel?
nah mate im poor it is what it is
What happened to the cheap oled displays, it is a printing technology where they use printers to make the oldest and it was supposed to get super cheap.
11k for a 75"
109" 75" is 8k
Many of the competitor’s Micro LED can get significantly brighter than 1000 nits. Also, if you want 4K resolution, you’re going to need more than that 70 something inch one.
You don’t need more than 1000 nits for a Micro inside your home, did you watch the video? They had reduced the brightness to 30% and it was gleaming.
The importance of 4K resolution is less emphasized when it comes to MicroLED technology for several reasons:
Pixel Density and Size: MicroLED displays use tiny, self-emitting LEDs that allow for incredibly high pixel densities, especially at larger screen sizes. As the pixel density increases, the difference between 1080p and 4K becomes less noticeable to the human eye, especially when sitting at a typical viewing distance.
Superior Contrast and Brightness: MicroLED displays can achieve exceptional contrast ratios and brightness levels due to their ability to control each pixel independently (similar to OLED). These features can enhance the viewing experience so much that the need for higher resolution (like 4K) becomes less critical compared to the visual improvements in color accuracy, brightness, and black levels.
Scalability and Flexibility: MicroLED technology is more scalable than traditional OLED or LCD panels, meaning that it can easily be produced in various sizes, including very large screens. At larger sizes, the visual impact of 4K resolution diminishes, as the individual pixels become smaller and harder to distinguish from normal viewing distances.
In summary, MicroLED’s advantages in terms of pixel density, contrast, brightness, and flexibility make 4K less of a defining factor for its appeal, especially when compared to traditional display technologies.
@ You’re only fooling yourself. Do you even know what pixel density is? The biggest drawback for Micro LED is the ability to increase Pixel Density. It’s very hard and expensive to make smaller screen sizes. This is why they are done modularly, because it’s harder to increase pixel density. Also, this Micro LED, from this company, is nowhere near as bright as the competitors, which can do 10,000 nits of brightness.
Not everyone can fit a 100 + inch display in their home. Unless they can reduce the size and increase the pixel density, to be able to cater to mass consumers, this will not be a mass-consumer product. The biggest hurdles are the costs of manufacturing and the ability to increase pixel density.
You’re confusing larger size as somehow relating to larger pixel density. A 100-inch 4K display has less pixel density than a 55-inch 4K display. You keep talking about viewing distance, which is true, but most people do not have the room to view a 100 + inch display at normal distance, hence they will be able to see the pixelation from the lack of pixel density, because they will be sitting far too close.
@ You’re one of those fools that keep downplaying the importance of brightness. Do you realize that, even on a cloudy day, the amount of light in that environment is still significantly brighter than 1000 nits? The entire point of having perfect black levels is create room for contrast. HDR displays are simply trying to more realistically display what our own eyes can see. What’s the point of investing in In-organic emitting diodes that can be significantly brighter than organic ones, when you limit it to only 1000 nits of brightness? Many OLED displays can already emit more than 1000 nits of brightness, in peak 3 - 10 percent windows. On smaller displays, they can even emit over 1000 nits of full-screen brightness.
Micro-LED can get significantly brighter, so don’t try and defend Micro-LED’s shortcomings by saying 1000 nits of brightness is perfect, because that’s downplaying the entire point of Micro-LED.
@ does the picture not look bright enough? Every reviewer has said it is immensely bright. Go buy an Oled, bad choice but you have your own opinion.
still too expensive! not for ordinary middle class families.
49,990 😂
1/5 of the cost of the closest competition. May not be for you but consumers who can afford the 162” Micro are ecstatic.
actually it’s cob miniled not real MicroLED，1080p starts from 81"，only 60hz，but still it’s cheap made in china hah
It certainly is real Micro LED technology, do you homework before you speak like a child.
@@jaychannel8558 cob flip-chip miniled，nothing more
It is not $14,990, the 162” model cost $31.5k… that said imo the price is acceptable for what it offers, hopefully in a few years we can get one for 1/3 of the price and THAT will be affordable.
He said $49,990
Much too expensive, the production cost is no where near that ! Many people are blinded by "new" tech and pay overprice !
Micro LEDs are expensive primarily because of the following factors:
1. **Manufacturing Complexity**: Producing micro LEDs requires precise and intricate processes. Each micro LED is minuscule (often smaller than 100 micrometers), and placing millions or even billions of them onto a display panel with accuracy is highly challenging. The technology involved in the mass transfer and bonding of these tiny LEDs is still developing, and achieving the necessary precision is costly.
2. **Material Costs**: Micro LEDs are typically made from high-quality materials like gallium nitride (GaN) and sapphire, which are expensive. Additionally, the materials used in micro LED displays must be carefully processed to ensure consistent brightness, color accuracy, and longevity.
3. **Yield Rates**: Due to the small size of each LED and the complex manufacturing processes, achieving a high yield of functional micro LEDs is difficult. The lower the yield, the more expensive it becomes to produce large, defect-free panels, as defective micro LEDs must be discarded or replaced.
4. **Limited Production Scale**: As of now, micro LED technology is still emerging and not produced at the same scale as other display technologies like OLED or LCD. Limited production runs lead to higher per-unit costs.
5. **Advanced Equipment**: The equipment required to manufacture micro LEDs, such as specialized wafer bonding tools and alignment systems, is highly advanced and costly.
6. **Research and Development**: Since micro LED technology is still in its early stages compared to more established display technologies, manufacturers invest heavily in R&D. These costs are often passed on to consumers.
As the technology matures, production scales up, and yields improve, the price of micro LEDs is expected to drop. But for now, these factors contribute to their high cost.
so? LG has an 8K 272-inch Micro LED for several years. the Chinese only know how to copy other manufacturers and steal patents from other manufacturers, that's why most of those copied Chinese products will not be sold outside of China, due to patent rights.
Great, now we can all enjoy that DLSS, FG, MFG fake AI generated blurry mess like never before. Make that shit even more obvious.
1000 nits? And what is the benefit of microled is then? Samsung one is 10,000 nits and that’s the real deal
And only 10000:1 contrast. Something not right here.
You would never use 10,000 nits indoors. It’s COB tech and it’s better quality than the competition. Did you see the wafer display when he removed it? Did the images look bad to you? It looked amazing, every influencer that actually saw it says it’s as good as the competition. Go buy the Samsung 145 for $240k, I’ll take the 162” AWALL for 49k.
@@aprozsolt8046it’s 10,000 to 1 native, but infinite while watching certain contrast. These guys are lowering the price, being honest with all specs and offering an array of sizes and pixel pitch, and your complaing?
@@jaychannel8558 what is the purpose of a 10000:1 contrast ratio tv with 1000 nits brightness with that price ?
These are inferior numbers next to todays oled and miniled tvs.
@@aprozsolt8046Micros have millions of LED bulbs in them, 81” has 5.7 million. These LEDs are infused in the outside of the panel. It is the pinnacle of tv tech. Their specs are perfect for the home. No glare, no burn, 180 viewing angle, not backlight, over 100 rec 20/20, expandable, last 100,000 hours, replaceable 8” display. It looks as though they spec it for the home. Very smart to do to make it affordable. In my opinion the displays in this video look brighter and have more contrast, than the oled qled. Oh, I forget up to 6 multiviiew sources. You’re stuck in the past, comparing apples to oranges. It’s like saying a projector has 10,000 nits, is it going to look like a 10,000 nit OLED? Their rep said they turned down the brightness to 30% because it was too bright for the room.
When you have to say 79 90 instead of $7,990 it’s still too expensive.
Or generally saying 8000.
I’ll take 5… 😂😂
I suppose someone who can afford this wouldn’t be asking what’s the refresh rate, how many inputs, and if it has support for eARC 😅
Exactly lol! would love to game on that 162". This video doesn't do the quality and brightness justice. truly amazing in person.
$7990 *US* I guess "people can afford it" in the world a TH-cam creators with 1.23m subscribers 😂🤣. Get serious.
So true. It's like saying that exotic car only costs $200,000 and because competitors are selling them for $500,000 that some how makes the $200,000 car "affordable" $7990 US is not affordable for a TV for most people.
its also only 1000 nits in a 10000 nit world.
This is absurdly cheap compared to the competition. Makes me feel they might actually get somewhat affordable in the next few years. Micro-led is the endgame for displays. This isnt even a rich person's tv. This is the first time at tv is available for a middle class enthusiast
Yeah :/ when he first said that I thought he said $799 and I was like yeah that's so affordable!!!
@@veilmontTV
LOL maybe read what @dovan4092 wrote to get the point of my comment. "compared to the competition" is entirely irrelevant if $7990 US makes the TV just as out of reach as it would be at 10 times that price right now. I'm middle class and bought the Sony A95L last week. Literally every one I know thinks I'm out of my mind spending what I did for my TV that isn't half the price of this TV and these people all make 6 figures and still think I paid too much for a TV.
Not for the masses 🤪😂🤣💯👎👎👎
hi
Whoa… what are LG, Samsung, and Sony doing? They have loads of money, and they couldn’t do this? I’m assuming it’s not weird corporate greed
you're talking nonsense, making micro leds is inexpensive, they are still in development, not yet mature, but the current demand on the market is very low, so very expensive in 7 years, that will be the price of a led screen today.
Maybe… try clarifying this
The reason market demand has been low was because the prices were astronomical. This is the first brand that is managing to lower prices by 5x compared to their competitors.
🤣
Love the tech BUT…
Affordable?? Ppl are losing their mind with the post pandemic inflation legitimizing.
No. not for the Everyman.
Comparatively. My family can afford it at $8k, and we’re not rich. But anything $10k or above? For a TV, nope
How much to make a 27-32 inch 😂😂
Ok
Shesh
Dude this is by far the best tv I have seen at CES, the suction cup tv is epic but this is way better. You know this will get cheaper as the tech gets better