I managed to pick up a 7900XT for £599, which is the same price as a 4070 Super where I am, so the choice was clear for me. Insanely better raster performance, more vram for not crazy worse RT (I usually turn it off anyways or try it just to see what it’s like) and I just prefer AMD’s software after using it for 4 years. XESS 1.3 is rlly good and means I can get comparable image quality to DLSS without it looking bad like FSR, although hopefully FSR 3.1 is good
From what I could see the 7900xt ran better until you scaled to the highest settings, but the 4070 still didn’t run all that great, so you will probably not want to run highest settings anyway. They were almost even when glss 3 was on, but not all games are compatible with that. 7900xt is probably the winner.
@@dirtsoap9333 Sorry, but RT is a gimmick right now. It just gimps performance. Even on a 4090. It won't be worth using until a couple more generations when it can be used natively. I own a 4090 and a 7900xtx machine. They're both great and I don't use RT on either of them.
Well Mr. Uauoauoa whatever, Nvidia wins in both of them but loses only in price, I hope you will never type sh*t like this ever again. Have a great day Uaoauaou!
@@pluschy7886 I mean he cannot compare two video cards and say AMD is faster in rasterization and Nvidia in RT, so let's conclude ( if he said Nvidia RT, he meant all of their videocards the same goes for amd ), Nvidia is overall faster than AMD, in terms of everything. But it's only less ideal for customers because of the price ranges.
@@boyfromtexasschool8963 No its not unless you're comparing the 4090 with all other amd cards which is stupid. But almost all amd equivalent cards are all faster in raster.
cant we just agree now that graphics got literally photorealistic and we dont need neither more pixels on the screen, nor more frames... and just stop buying new gpus every couple of years? and maybe focus on making games more fun instead of cramming more pixels?
I would rather ignore ray tracing even in this generation as it is a heavy graphical setting. Cuz anyway your fps drops significantly even in the 4070s unless u have a 4090 or 4080. Alan Wake and Cyberpunk are good examples to show that 4070s with ray tracing and 2k max settings can only resist till 2025 probably around 60 fps so I think not considering ray tracing, 7900xt is a forward-thinking choice.
Honestly if you're gonna buy a gpu over 500$ then just save your money if you can and get a 4070 ti super. It's basically 7900xt raster with actually good ray tracing and dlss
RTX 4070 below 16 gb VRAM = GTX 970 with 3.5 gb VRAM, then get replaced by cheaper GTX 1050ti and midrange gtx 1060 6gb. Wait for 16 vram become mandatory midrange for PS5 era.
Ironically, you just proved that Nvidia chips are massively overpriced. If a 4070S is almost the same price as a 7900XT. 4070S is $600 while 7900XT is $700. AMD also has 20GB of VRAM compared to 12.
4060 ti 16gb is one of the finest nvidia mid ranger ever made.. it have excellent performance like 3070, even it have 128bit bus but it can easily utilise full of its vram if required due to the large l2, its extremely efficient, cold and have many small varriants, one thing is absurd of that card is the price and won't perform its full for pcie 3.0 sysem due to only x8 lanes
@@den116ru8 до 240-250 вообще без потерь ужмется точно думаю, по крайней мере 6800хт с 270 до 210 ужимал но и 4070с с 220 до 160ватт можно поджать(тоже делаю в сборках постоянно на не самых холодных палитах дуалках)
Here in Australia I can pick up either of these cards for $1049AU at the moment. It's hard to look past the 7900XT in this case. Due to its more vram, I believe it'll have a longer life, especially with the amount of vram games are commanding. And that's only going to get worse as time goes by.
Ngl i'd say just wait for the 5000 series, you could either wait for the new cards to drop and buy them OR buy the 4070 super / 4080 when the price drops. If you don't want to wait tho then go for the 4070 super, no brainer if you want RT.
I had the same dilemma. The best option is to wait for 5000-series if you can. Personally, I went with the 4070 S but only because I very much enjoy RT plus the 4070 S was open-box + discounted (I would have not bought it for regular price). If you really like RT, the 4070 S is your only choice but if you are keeping this card for a while you may struggle to run newer games on Ultra settings in the next year or so due to only having 12GB. If you want something that will age a lot better and give better value, the 7900XT is your choice. I would recommend looking at 7900XT RT/FSR performance for the games you want and see if it's good enough for you. If the RT performance is good enough, get the 7900XT otherwise get the 4070 S. Good luck.
@@Zalionn Thanks for the answer. i decided to go for 4070S open Box. 450$ for asus dual card. im waiting now for RDNA4, because 5070 will have again 12GB Vram!
@@redrumbone I don't think they care about it I have to admit that I love the way that RT makes the game look better but you'll lose about 30% or even more by enabling it I personally love to enable RT even if I got about 65-70 (I'm using a 75Hz monitor) so I'm fine with it
@@redrumbone personally yes and no, witcher 3 next gen looks ugly af imo, prefer old-gen version and play on that. but when i see cyberpunk 2077 i absolutely love it, but i hate shooter games so i dont even own the game lol. but i wanna be able to if iu want to, i dont really care much about losing a few fps as downside owning a 4070 ti
I was fortunate enough (financially) to upgrade from a second hand $300 RX 6700 XT that I bought last year to the RTX 4070 Super. It is my first Nvidia GPU and I have been on 4 generations of AMD Graphics before that. After experiencing every settings setup in Cyberpunk 2077 and other games testing both GPUs and compared the results, I get why AMD is really the better choice for those looking to get every inch of their money's worth. HOWEVER, Nvidia's Ray Tracing, DLSS, and Frame Generation are all better. This is the reason why AMD Radeon market share is on a steep downhill recently. They have no special tech that is innovative and run better compared to Nvidia. The recent rumors that AMD won't focus on the high end for the next generation is not gonna make their situation any better.
ROCm drivers and support still suck, so unfortunately for now I cant buy AMD and Im stuck with Nvidia because of all the local Ai stuff Im doing. Sad because AMD does seem to have better hardware. Edit: Yes, Ive already tried to make some AMD cards work for local Ai stuff Im doing but honetly its still night and day between a 7600 vs a nvidia 4070 or 4080 for local Ai performance. At best, local Ai apps are just translating cuda core support into ROCm support, and thats not good enough.
Yeah an Extra 0.75 cents per month. Total $9 per year. Electric difference.... Then Nvidia bro's put a Intel CPU in that same PC pulling 300 watts and go "PoWeR sAvE" Lmao
@@CurseEnforcer tested Cyberpunk in the bar. And Metro Exodus. on Quality mode. All these upscalers feel a bit of a scam. On 1080p had much more fps than 1440p dlls quality and no flickering etc.
Direct competitor to the 7900 xt is the 4070 ti/ti super. 4070 super is closer to a 7900 gre. I’d rather save the $ and go with the 4070s vs the 7900 xt unless th 7900 xt fell to $600-650
Honestly I would give this to Nvidia even if the pure rasterised performance of the 7900XT is generally a bit to a lot better. Power draw is clearly better on the 4070s and Nvidia features like RT support and DLSS3 are hard to ignore. The cheapest 7900XT I could find here is $1169 compared to the cheapest 4070s being AU $999 and I know what I would choose. AMD graphics products are sadly not in the same league as Ryzen but I really hope they catch up a bit more
I can play Cyberpunk 2077 with path tracing and balanced dlss in 1440p with my 4070 super. 4070 super is better because of ray tracing and dlss. If you don’t care about these features go for the amd gpu.
I really like AMD but in this case I would choose the RTX 4070 Super, it is cheaper, consumes less energy and has the issue of Ray Tracing, not to mention the fact of DLSS 3.
For 3D 7900xt is better.. if you are developer then you can go with 4070 but for as a 3D artist it's better to have more vram....and 7900XR has plenty of it over 4070... I am my self experienced 3D Generalist using 7900xt... Vram helps you so much with substance suits and unreal shaders.
How the hell did AMD manage to make their CPUs so insanely power efficient, but their graphics cards might as well come with their own power cable to be separately plugged into the socket?!
Настройка через билс для тебя шутка? Или фанаты нвидиа все такие, что не в сотстоянии думать? Легче же играть в фейковые кадры через длсс, зачем производительность
Those videos exist already, these channels make a wide range of videos so people can compare whatever GPUs they’re looking at or upgrading to and from.
AMD fanboys' ultimate word: "NVIDIA is too greedy; they could add more RAM and become a better graphics card." Bro, with your RX card giving you a whopping 10-20 fps boost on older AAA games, you must love living in the past. Enjoy your extra 5-10 fps in newer games with AMD's outdated rendering tech and no new features like RT and DLSS. While you're stuck playing games with traditional rendering on a $700 graphics card, we NVIDIA users are enjoying real-time ray tracing and smooth fps. You're not just being cheap; you're fanboys who can't let go of your favorite brand, even as it gets lamer over time without any significant upgrades.
Cyberpunk 7900xt- 30 FPS difference Alan wake 2 - 11 fps difference Hogwarts - 23 FPS difference Starfield - 20 fps difference Horizon forbidden west- 17 fps difference 😂😂 RT is not really an issue since FSR3 frame generation is now accessible. You can literally get a 7900xt for similar money as the 4070 super. Even undervolting the XT, it is still faster than the super. 😂keep crying
@@jellyuserлол, FSR 3.0 увеличил бы фпс с 100 до 200😉 Зеленые никак не могут понять, что всё что им остаётся, это играть в фейковые кадры через длсс и 12GB в 2024 году
Well the 4070 super is better i mean you can play heavy games with ray tracing on with the 7900xt is harder to do that it also needs more power not worth
@@drakotaz7729 Buddy just because the nvidia card has slightly better raytracing dosnt mean its better. the amd card is better suited long term as it has better rasterization and more vram. stop being an nvidia shill lmao
More heat is true. More noise? Buy a decent card? Air cooling a ~320W Card silent is easy enough. Less durability? What the fuck? How did you come to this conclusion?
You could probably undervolt the 7900xt if you care that much about the heat. Set a custom fan curve or lock the fan speed. Durability probably won’t matter in the long run as long as you have good cooling from a good brand. 4070S loses in almost everything except power draw and price.
sad amd fan noises, where i live the 4070super costs about 600 euro while the 7900xt costs about 750 euro for 1 or 2 models and then immidietely jumping up to 800 euro, since the 4070 super has way better power consumption it also requires smaller psu so i guess nvidia wins this one?!
@@pravnav does your response to my comment make any sense even? all i said is that where i live the amd gpu is worse value than the nvidia gpu and the reason i started my comment with "where i live" was because its not priced the same everywhere little jimmy, the world does not revolve around you you know.
Games :
Ghost of Tsushima - 0:06
Alan Wake 2 - 1:01
Alan Wake 2 | RT, DLSS\FSR - 1:57
Cyberpunk 2077 - 2:49
Cyberpunk 2077 | RT, DLSS\FSR - 3:51
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 4:49
Hogwarts Legacy - 5:45
Hogwarts Legacy | RT - 6:44
Forza Horizon 5 - 7:38
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 8:40
Starfield - 9:34
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 10:27
Horizon Forbidden West - 11:22
System:
Windows 11
Ryzen 7 7800X3D - bit.ly/43e3VxW
MSI MPG X670E CARBON
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3XlBGdU
RTX 4070 SUPER 12GB - bit.ly/3S59r1n
RADEON RX 7900 XT 20GB - bit.ly/3W06ek8
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
If the 4070 Super had 16 GB of VRAM it would be a perfect mid-range GPU but unfortunately Nvidia is too greedy
They could have made it 24GB.
@@lharsayAnd the price would go up like crazy
@@EmeraldDreami yes
It's enough for now, next year who knows... with DLSS you also get lower memory usage
Bro called 4070 Super a mid range GPU
I managed to pick up a 7900XT for £599, which is the same price as a 4070 Super where I am, so the choice was clear for me. Insanely better raster performance, more vram for not crazy worse RT (I usually turn it off anyways or try it just to see what it’s like) and I just prefer AMD’s software after using it for 4 years. XESS 1.3 is rlly good and means I can get comparable image quality to DLSS without it looking bad like FSR, although hopefully FSR 3.1 is good
I agree with you.
4070S would be a good card for the price if not those 12GB barely enough for this year.
Even 8gb is enough for this year maybe in 2025 12 gb will be a problem
Very large 20gb vram vs 12gb
Big 320bit bus vs 192 bit
+25% raster performance
7900xt is ready for a lot of years to come maybe 10 years.
Але ти вже не можеш пограти з комфортом в ігри з rtx а я можу😂
Про які 10 років ти говориш брате?
@@waginolog 12gb rtx XD
@@maxhunter3070 на 20 % слабше ядро у 7900. Ти вже зараз в минулому бро xD
@@waginolog 7900 xt has the same ray tracing or better
@@yacquubfarah6038😂😂
From what I could see the 7900xt ran better until you scaled to the highest settings, but the 4070 still didn’t run all that great, so you will probably not want to run highest settings anyway. They were almost even when glss 3 was on, but not all games are compatible with that. 7900xt is probably the winner.
RX 7900 XT wins
Easy win for red team.
Rx 7900 xt has more raw proformace however the rtx 4070 has more bells. Just comes down to what you want and what price you can get these cards for.
Never greencard again, ever. I switched from 3080 to 7900 xt, oh boy what a beast.
Yeah, until you turn on RT
lol until you do 4k or anything ray tracing
@@kraithaywirethan turn RT on and turn off rest...
@@dirtsoap9333 why would 7900 xt be worse at 4k? it literally has far more vram
@@dirtsoap9333 Sorry, but RT is a gimmick right now. It just gimps performance. Even on a 4090.
It won't be worth using until a couple more generations when it can be used natively.
I own a 4090 and a 7900xtx machine. They're both great and I don't use RT on either of them.
RT: Nvidia
Raster: Amd
Well Mr. Uauoauoa whatever, Nvidia wins in both of them but loses only in price, I hope you will never type sh*t like this ever again. Have a great day Uaoauaou!
@@boyfromtexasschool8963how does it lose in raster? I’m an NVIDIA guy too but isn’t the raster faster here?
@@pluschy7886 I mean he cannot compare two video cards and say AMD is faster in rasterization and Nvidia in RT, so let's conclude ( if he said Nvidia RT, he meant all of their videocards the same goes for amd ), Nvidia is overall faster than AMD, in terms of everything. But it's only less ideal for customers because of the price ranges.
@@boyfromtexasschool8963 No its not unless you're comparing the 4090 with all other amd cards which is stupid. But almost all amd equivalent cards are all faster in raster.
@@boyfromtexasschool8963 Bros saying that as if price isn't a big deal 💀
Ray tracing is the only selling strategy left for nvidia. Maybe Dlss as well.
and good drivers. and reflex. and dldsr.
Nvidia does not have any competition low life
im not nvidia fanboy, i have both builds and I wish amd one was better supported.
Drivers are fine with AMD I don't know what problem you had. I have a rx 7900xtx and had no issues with it in the last 6 months or so.
@@dawoodhaider2552 many issues in Overwatch and Destiny 2, same card
Why did you compare ray tracing to games that only NVIDIA supports?
Why didn't you do that with Forza?
Forza don't have hardware rt
@@CurseEnforcer But it has RT
@@رائدالاسمري-د5غ That's just reflection software based
Those are the most rt heavy games that actually use the technology, others just use soft reflection and that's why amd cards can keep up there
Delusional AMD fanboy crying lmao. Tell AMD to do be better at RT.
cant we just agree now that graphics got literally photorealistic and we dont need neither more pixels on the screen, nor more frames... and just stop buying new gpus every couple of years? and maybe focus on making games more fun instead of cramming more pixels?
Rtx 40 series have frame generation, its ez for Nvidia) I think 4080 its a best GPU in the world today.
I am sure if AMD implement all nvidia features to radeon, 7700XT would cost same as 4070S.
the 7900xt is a good choice
I would rather ignore ray tracing even in this generation as it is a heavy graphical setting. Cuz anyway your fps drops significantly even in the 4070s unless u have a 4090 or 4080. Alan Wake and Cyberpunk are good examples to show that 4070s with ray tracing and 2k max settings can only resist till 2025 probably around 60 fps so I think not considering ray tracing, 7900xt is a forward-thinking choice.
Rx 7900 xt 👍
Honestly if you're gonna buy a gpu over 500$ then just save your money if you can and get a 4070 ti super. It's basically 7900xt raster with actually good ray tracing and dlss
RTX 4070 below 16 gb VRAM = GTX 970 with 3.5 gb VRAM, then get replaced by cheaper GTX 1050ti and midrange gtx 1060 6gb.
Wait for 16 vram become mandatory midrange for PS5 era.
As a amd fanboi nvidia didn't give to this chad 4 extra gb, it would be absolutely chad
Did u use fsr but NVIDIA can use dlss
Me watching this knowing damn well i can't afford either: 👀
That 110 w+ on amd gpu thuu ........
200 watt
Vs
300 watt
Lmao
dam 560eu vs 700eu idk hard choice
radeon have advantages for.games..without dlss
100Watt + winner ?
Amd vs everybody
If you have money then buy both
The sad state of AMD, a X9XX class AMD GPU having to compete against a XX7X class Nvidia one....
Who care what card names , what matters is price to price comparison.
You know this isn’t about product names lol, it’s about how they are priced and what other cards are in their price stack
Ironically, you just proved that Nvidia chips are massively overpriced. If a 4070S is almost the same price as a 7900XT. 4070S is $600 while 7900XT is $700. AMD also has 20GB of VRAM compared to 12.
100w+ for an extra 10-11 avg. fps? Ask your wallet if it is worth your electricity bill.
That’s like two bucks for my electric bill
7900xt burns 100W+ more
4060 ti 16gb is one of the finest nvidia mid ranger ever made.. it have excellent performance like 3070, even it have 128bit bus but it can easily utilise full of its vram if required due to the large l2, its extremely efficient, cold and have many small varriants, one thing is absurd of that card is the price and won't perform its full for pcie 3.0 sysem due to only x8 lanes
7800xt absolutely shatters 4060 ti tho, even in ray tracing
@@Efsaaneh if 4060ti 16 gb comes within $370
AMD RX 7900 XT😍
AMD 20GB Vram
Nvidia 12GB Vram
Bug nvidia is betterave when the gc are at 100%
the 7900xt is $900, the 4070 super is $600... who would've guessed the more expensive gpu has more vram?
@@prodtetch$700 to $600 now
@@prodtetch7900xt is $700, 4070s is $600. Very comparable at that price.
@@prodtetchBoth are 700$
That 100w+ on amd tho..
Indeed, this just adds up to the RT performance and the additional money...
I have the XFX RX 7900XT speedster merc 310 black edition.😊
Андервольтинг сделать и минус 70 100 ват делов то хD
@@den116ru8 до 240-250 вообще без потерь ужмется точно думаю, по крайней мере 6800хт с 270 до 210 ужимал но и 4070с с 220 до 160ватт можно поджать(тоже делаю в сборках постоянно на не самых холодных палитах дуалках)
@@666tractor_fbi9 Даже спорить не буду))
7900XT OC=4080
Mam 7900XT potwierdzam świetna karciocha polecam
FSR ?
Is VRAM really important or 12GB is enough for atleast 5 years?
12 GB isnt enough for 1440p in 2024
12GB isnt enough for 1080p ULTRA/RT in 2024
you need 20+ GB, 16 is mehhh, minimun
@@IscAst4no, 8gb is minimum. 12 is good. 16 is perfect and 20+ just for the higher range cards
@@IscAst4games in this benchmark run perfectly fine on 12GB 4070S at 1440p ultra settings and with RT but suddenly it isn’t enough?
LOL
@@flamingophone
Yeah, in Narnia 😂
@@Vester77
Eso dicen los números, pero jugando te das cuenta que la experiencia de juego cambia dependiendo de la Vram
Here in Australia I can pick up either of these cards for $1049AU at the moment. It's hard to look past the 7900XT in this case. Due to its more vram, I believe it'll have a longer life, especially with the amount of vram games are commanding. And that's only going to get worse as time goes by.
bought a 4070 super for $869. Not a fan of amd cards anymore as my 6600xt crashes randomly.
7900xt is a beast....
Nvidia and AMD do not compete in the same price range as the green side has much more technology.
When 4070S and 7900XT online 50$ difference and i want Rt too. What should i choice?
Ngl i'd say just wait for the 5000 series, you could either wait for the new cards to drop and buy them OR buy the 4070 super / 4080 when the price drops.
If you don't want to wait tho then go for the 4070 super, no brainer if you want RT.
I had the same dilemma. The best option is to wait for 5000-series if you can. Personally, I went with the 4070 S but only because I very much enjoy RT plus the 4070 S was open-box + discounted (I would have not bought it for regular price). If you really like RT, the 4070 S is your only choice but if you are keeping this card for a while you may struggle to run newer games on Ultra settings in the next year or so due to only having 12GB. If you want something that will age a lot better and give better value, the 7900XT is your choice. I would recommend looking at 7900XT RT/FSR performance for the games you want and see if it's good enough for you. If the RT performance is good enough, get the 7900XT otherwise get the 4070 S. Good luck.
@@Zalionn Thanks for the answer. i decided to go for 4070S open Box. 450$ for asus dual card. im waiting now for RDNA4, because 5070 will have again 12GB Vram!
@@Zalionn At this point wait for the 8000s 8k 120fps standard
If you're really not after RT, get the RX 7900 GRE. If you do care about RT, get the 4070S.
Do a lot of people care about ray tracing? (serious question)
I think so. I don't know about everyone but I do @@redrumbone
@@redrumbone I don't think they care about it
I have to admit that I love the way that RT makes the game look better but you'll lose about 30% or even more by enabling it
I personally love to enable RT even if I got about 65-70 (I'm using a 75Hz monitor) so I'm fine with it
@@redrumbone personally yes and no, witcher 3 next gen looks ugly af imo, prefer old-gen version and play on that. but when i see cyberpunk 2077 i absolutely love it, but i hate shooter games so i dont even own the game lol. but i wanna be able to if iu want to, i dont really care much about losing a few fps as downside
owning a 4070 ti
4070 Ti Super is the most worth buying card this generation, you get like the most of everything for your money in this one, I think.
I was fortunate enough (financially) to upgrade from a second hand $300 RX 6700 XT that I bought last year to the RTX 4070 Super. It is my first Nvidia GPU and I have been on 4 generations of AMD Graphics before that.
After experiencing every settings setup in Cyberpunk 2077 and other games testing both GPUs and compared the results, I get why AMD is really the better choice for those looking to get every inch of their money's worth. HOWEVER, Nvidia's Ray Tracing, DLSS, and Frame Generation are all better. This is the reason why AMD Radeon market share is on a steep downhill recently. They have no special tech that is innovative and run better compared to Nvidia. The recent rumors that AMD won't focus on the high end for the next generation is not gonna make their situation any better.
Hi!, great video as usual. I think the correct comparison will be the 7800XT vs 4070S rather than a 7900XT
You mean RX 7900 GRE
7800xt cost closest to 4060ti. Why would you compare it to much more expensive card?
@@Pawcio2115 yeah that will also do, thank you brother
@@Солембум "closest to 4060 ti", yeah just by 40% 💀
@@Солембум pass me the weed you high ob to bro
ROCm drivers and support still suck, so unfortunately for now I cant buy AMD and Im stuck with Nvidia because of all the local Ai stuff Im doing. Sad because AMD does seem to have better hardware. Edit: Yes, Ive already tried to make some AMD cards work for local Ai stuff Im doing but honetly its still night and day between a 7600 vs a nvidia 4070 or 4080 for local Ai performance. At best, local Ai apps are just translating cuda core support into ROCm support, and thats not good enough.
What you save by buying AMD cards then you pay it on with the electricity bill
Yeah an Extra 0.75 cents per month. Total $9 per year. Electric difference.... Then Nvidia bro's put a Intel CPU in that same PC pulling 300 watts and go "PoWeR sAvE" Lmao
@@SemperValor Should I remind you that he's comparing the second best amd card against 6th from Nvidia?
DLSS vs FSR ?
Dlss looks almost identical to native res while fsr just sharpens the image up and it looks fuzzy and noisy
@@CurseEnforcerdont forget to add flickering,unstable picture to Dlss
@@genasgenas the titles I play don't have those. You must be talking about tlou or rdr2
@@CurseEnforcer tested Cyberpunk in the bar. And Metro Exodus.
on Quality mode. All these upscalers feel a bit of a scam. On 1080p had much more fps than 1440p dlls quality and no flickering etc.
@@genasgenas maybe on a large screen but on laptop there's no such thing
У меня,при такой же конфигурации пк,fps намного больше на 7900xt+7800x3d
При каком разрешении?
Direct competitor to the 7900 xt is the 4070 ti/ti super. 4070 super is closer to a 7900 gre. I’d rather save the $ and go with the 4070s vs the 7900 xt unless th 7900 xt fell to $600-650
12gb XD 7900XT OC=4080
Don’t know why im watching this my pc is used primarily for photos and video editing only😫
Nur ein Narr kauft eine AMD Karte für 700€...ohne Futures 🤦♂️
Honestly I would give this to Nvidia even if the pure rasterised performance of the 7900XT is generally a bit to a lot better. Power draw is clearly better on the 4070s and Nvidia features like RT support and DLSS3 are hard to ignore. The cheapest 7900XT I could find here is $1169 compared to the cheapest 4070s being AU $999 and I know what I would choose. AMD graphics products are sadly not in the same league as Ryzen but I really hope they catch up a bit more
USE FRAME GENERATION!!! 100Z POWER NVIDIA GPU
Wait iam switching to raedeon😃
I can play Cyberpunk 2077 with path tracing and balanced dlss in 1440p with my 4070 super. 4070 super is better because of ray tracing and dlss. If you don’t care about these features go for the amd gpu.
I really like AMD but in this case I would choose the RTX 4070 Super, it is cheaper, consumes less energy and has the issue of Ray Tracing, not to mention the fact of DLSS 3.
excellent!
in games that have DLSS3 Fg but dont have FSR3 FG use AFMF(driver level FG for AMD) or mod in FSR3 Fg so its fair
which one is good for 3d work
4070
For 3D 7900xt is better.. if you are developer then you can go with 4070 but for as a 3D artist it's better to have more vram....and 7900XR has plenty of it over 4070... I am my self experienced 3D Generalist using 7900xt... Vram helps you so much with substance suits and unreal shaders.
I would still choose 4070 super
And you would be right
I did. Glad I did.
Good for you
You loser. You would choose the 4070 super even vs 7900xtx😅😅
@@goregejones7248 correct
ray tracing disactivated mah
How the hell did AMD manage to make their CPUs so insanely power efficient, but their graphics cards might as well come with their own power cable to be separately plugged into the socket?!
Настройка через билс для тебя шутка? Или фанаты нвидиа все такие, что не в сотстоянии думать? Легче же играть в фейковые кадры через длсс, зачем производительность
Please add Star Citizen to the game list
200 w vs 300 w
4070 super ❤
It should be Rtx 4070Ti super Vs Rx 7900XT
Those videos exist already, these channels make a wide range of videos so people can compare whatever GPUs they’re looking at or upgrading to and from.
AMD fanboys' ultimate word: "NVIDIA is too greedy; they could add more RAM and become a better graphics card."
Bro, with your RX card giving you a whopping 10-20 fps boost on older AAA games, you must love living in the past. Enjoy your extra 5-10 fps in newer games with AMD's outdated rendering tech and no new features like RT and DLSS.
While you're stuck playing games with traditional rendering on a $700 graphics card, we NVIDIA users are enjoying real-time ray tracing and smooth fps.
You're not just being cheap; you're fanboys who can't let go of your favorite brand, even as it gets lamer over time without any significant upgrades.
Cyberpunk 7900xt- 30 FPS difference
Alan wake 2 - 11 fps difference
Hogwarts - 23 FPS difference
Starfield - 20 fps difference
Horizon forbidden west- 17 fps difference
😂😂 RT is not really an issue since FSR3 frame generation is now accessible.
You can literally get a 7900xt for similar money as the 4070 super. Even undervolting the XT, it is still faster than the super. 😂keep crying
the delusion is strong with this one 😂
Nshitia just keeps getting shittier keep crying enjoy your over priced slow ass cards🤣🤣🤣
What amd gpu driver ?
Ray tracing is the endgame. AMD has to get with the program.
They won't
they are 1 generation behind in raytracing because.. they implemented it 1 generation after.
@@hdhsu-dg6fb 2 generation behind*
@@CurseEnforcer 1 actually. i'd know considering i have a 7900xt.
@@hdhsu-dg6fb 7900xtx is still slower than rtx 3090 in rt so no 2 generation slower than Nvidia
the fact you are using dlss on the nvidia card and not using fsr on the amd card shows how biased you are lmao
It literally says in the video it is using fsr
@@jellyuserлол, FSR 3.0 увеличил бы фпс с 100 до 200😉 Зеленые никак не могут понять, что всё что им остаётся, это играть в фейковые кадры через длсс и 12GB в 2024 году
Nvidia tech is no joke indeed. Image quality from DLSS3 quality is better than native and with tons of fps.
Yupp.. fsr are bad pixel 😅😅😅
Again with dlss better than native mindset lol , always same words
Well the 4070 super is better i mean you can play heavy games with ray tracing on with the 7900xt is harder to do that it also needs more power not worth
you didn't even watch the video dude
@@hdhsu-dg6fb i did i watch many of these it’s always the same
@@drakotaz7729 Buddy just because the nvidia card has slightly better raytracing dosnt mean its better. the amd card is better suited long term as it has better rasterization and more vram. stop being an nvidia shill lmao
@@hdhsu-dg6fb ye like someone will use one of these for more than 6 years 🤣
@@drakotaz7729 yeah they will?
Чот странно - ты если используешь DLSS 3, так используй и FSR 3, что ли...
First
Over 100w difference. 100w more, more Heat, more noise, less durability. I choose 4070s no doubt.
More heat is true. More noise? Buy a decent card? Air cooling a ~320W Card silent is easy enough. Less durability? What the fuck? How did you come to this conclusion?
Fanboy
You could probably undervolt the 7900xt if you care that much about the heat. Set a custom fan curve or lock the fan speed. Durability probably won’t matter in the long run as long as you have good cooling from a good brand. 4070S loses in almost everything except power draw and price.
Nice but 4070 Super is the same class as 7800 XT/7900 GRE.
sad amd fan noises, where i live the 4070super costs about 600 euro while the 7900xt costs about 750 euro for 1 or 2 models and then immidietely jumping up to 800 euro, since the 4070 super has way better power consumption it also requires smaller psu so i guess nvidia wins this one?!
The whole world doesn’t revolve around you. It’s priced the same in other regions 🤡
@@pravnavcope
@@CurseEnforcer cope about what lmao you being wrong?
@@pravnav does your response to my comment make any sense even?
all i said is that where i live the amd gpu is worse value than the nvidia gpu and the reason i started my comment with "where i live" was because its not priced the same everywhere little jimmy, the world does not revolve around you you know.
@@fourty9933 the hell does your response make any sense? sounds like you are strengthening my argument lmao