14:09, there is a mistake, she said " if the wavelength is much smaller than an object then there will be no or minimal interaction between the wavelength and the object".
@22:30 receiving a polarization through the use of a filter is mentioned. Did you mean there is software processing post-antenna to make sure only the energy from a given polarization is received? I'd like to know more if so.
Thanks for information, I think there is mistake on dialectic constant part. "The amount of moisture in the soil and vegetation will increase the strength of backscattered signal." It is the other way.
there is a mistake about the incident angle. the figure give is right which is the angle between the incident light and the verticle direction, but what the video says seems to be wrong, which is the angle between the incident angle and earth surface
14:09, there is a mistake, she said " if the wavelength is much smaller than an object then there will be no or minimal interaction between the wavelength and the object".
so what is the actual concept?
Excellent content yet poor audio quality..
learning from someone who works at NASA .OMG! so phenomenal
Thank you for clear explanation of basic concepts :)
Vraiment inréressant. Merci pour tous ces renseignements
Some mighty amusing subtitles at 16:55...
Two types of remote observations passive and active passive measures energy emitted or reflected by the earths atmospheres system
Excellent presentation. Thank you ma'am.
@22:30 receiving a polarization through the use of a filter is mentioned. Did you mean there is software processing post-antenna to make sure only the energy from a given polarization is received? I'd like to know more if so.
Wonderful content... Thank you!
Thanks for information, I think there is mistake on dialectic constant part. "The amount of moisture in the soil and vegetation will increase the strength of backscattered signal." It is the other way.
Thank you for great video: The Nature Talks
Excellent, and informative. its help me a lot.
Clear explanation, Thanks a lot!
there is a mistake about the incident angle. the figure give is right which is the angle between the incident light and the verticle direction, but what the video says seems to be wrong, which is the angle between the incident angle and earth surface
thank you so much for clear explanation about SAR
Damn this stuff is available for free so cool
Nice explanation Erika
Thank you so much can you share me that how can I get backscattering coefficients of sentinel 1
Excellent review!
Thanks a lot! This is amazing content
does Multi-look filtering related to FFT filtering?
Fantastic information
Very helpful. Many thanks
Excellent
Thank you! Really helps me alot!!!
Excellent presentation. Thank you.
ready
thanks for the video. but the audio
28:40 please answer the phone :)
_The basics_ : then comes a one hour long video 🤣
Undergraduate level basics.
8:10
Thank you very match !
Thanks
Danke
How many armadillos in a football field?
Love from Kerala
28:34 is Kabul 2019…#protest #POW
Hello
Thanks nerd
Hello