"We know special forces operate in 4-6 man teams." Just imagine 3 of these passing you doing 100+ kph all 3 firing 25mm cannons at you with deadly accuracy.
Nice. Can I get it in blue? My wife says she wants our next car to be blue. We can keep the whole hidden turret thing between us and just tell her it's got a really intricate entertainment system. At least until I get cut off in traffic again, then it's "baby, push the red button for me"
@@richbob9155that's with the gun deployed and firing accurately. It can reach 200km/h with the gun stowed and en route to potential targets which is its strong point - interception
Half the fun of these videos is reading the comments to see the amazing insights of the undercover generals spending their day commenting on youtube videos, so many professionals sharing their enlightening ideas/opinions.
@@tuomaman2888Please do not use the terms “corrupted politicians”. Do not spread what is already there so we can keep it down from reaching more people.
My opinion as someone who spent too much time in armored vehicles. It’s very tight inside, the exterior is overly stylized, very poor visibility (windows are not a weak point like people think), the right seat screen appears to block a lot of visibility, two seat capacity (kind of odd). No spare tire, no external storage and limited internal storage (we carry lots of stuff(, no easy to swap grill guard. The weapon choice is interesting. Too small for armored vehicles or hardened targets, not not really for infantry. So basically it’s effective for lightly armored vehicles? I think having a coaxial gun like a 240 would be beneficial, or the main gun as an M2 or GAU-19 would be more universal. The ammo drum would need a quick change capability too. Just my two cents
As they say, it is more a proof of concept as a technology demonstrator. The company is specialized in designing turrets, not vehicles, and they usually adapt their turrets on all kind of chassis from other manufacturers. It is clear it needs lots of refinements based on actual requirements before being ready to be fielded.
@@mattshussett8063 I would hope the ride height is adjustable. Need decent clearance for normal use but not so much as to make it unstable at speed. I imagine it lowers a lot for higher speeds but who knows. We often drive. 55-65 on open dirt roads so we still need a decent amount of cleanse since the roads aren’t always smooth
Cockerill should go for the Mauser MK-27mm auto cannon is light weight and extremely powerful and the 27mm bullet have the same power of a 30mm cannon and is a super fast bullet with many types already avaible in prodution and in big stockpiles they are used in many Fighter jets, Helicopter and naval applications, super quality materials, fast rate of fire that is selective for slower rates and great power, the best auto cannon avaible, and Europe specialy NATO should make a tender for a 15mm cannon to double the fire power of the.50 cal to deliver almost the same power of the 20x102mm and rival and surpess the 14.5x115 russian ammo from the KPV, they just need to use the case of the 20x110mm hispano with a 15mm bullet
@@hermes6910 thats a great solution for this support vehicle, the Nexter GIAT M781 is very light 66kg and have a high rate of fire and is already use in the Narwhal rws for maritime use. Great system they should use them.
The turret is absolutely gorgeous. I do find it crazy that mechanized infantry units don’t get the same kind of systems that fighter pilots get in their helmets. I know those things are crazy expensive but the tech would definitely be better in terms of on the ground awareness like the guy was saying. The pass through screens would allow for unobstructed 360 views around the vehicle through its body. But, if you have to get out then you’re kinda SOL.
It’s always gorgeous until it’s being turned on you and your family. These weapons are way too advanced. If a fascist dictator comes to power in the U.S. or Europe, we are finished. There’ll no way to even dream of resistance. Between this, AI, robotics and surveillance.
It’s always gorgeous until it’s being turned on you and your family. These weapons are way too advanced. If a fcst dcttr comes to power in the U.S. or Europe, we are finished. There’ll no way to even dream of resistance. Between this, AI, robotics and surveillance, it’s just a matter of time before it’ll be weaponized on the domestic population.
@@xx133 1. Chill. 2. There are laws that would prevent an actual despot from remaining in power in the U.S. and other western countries. Even if it feels like the person in power is one. That’s why they separate the three branches of government. 3. Even if one does somehow take power you can’t act like a total coward and start pissing your pants while screaming “it’s over!” Even if a pilot is safe in his fighter jet, their family isn’t in that jet. Every enemy has a weakness, always.
I read about people like you in history. You fail to realize that the means of oppression you enable on one group will invariably be turned onto you. It’s a cliche at this point. For example, German women that supported the Nazi party in order to go after minorities they didn’t like (gay, trans, Jewish, black, etc) soon realized that they would be used for breeding the master race or exterminated in the eugenics program. So do you seriously think that a system that produced this vehicle, then weaponized it on the civilian population in Chicago wouldn’t eventually do the same in your neighborhood?
I read about people like you in history. You fail to realize that the means of oppression you enable on one group will invariably be turned onto you. It’s a cliche at this point. For example, German women that supported the Nazi party in order to go after minorities they didn’t like (gay, trans, Jewish, black, etc) soon realized that they would be used for breeding the master race or exterminated in the eugenics program. So do you seriously think that a system that produced this vehicle, then weaponized it on the civilian population in Chicago wouldn’t eventually do the same in your neighborhood?
I read about people like you in history. You fail to realize that the means of oppression you enable on one group will invariably be turned onto you. It’s a cliche at this point. For example, German women that supported the Nazi party in order to go after minorities they didn’t like (gay, trans, Jsh, bl, etc) soon realized that they would be used for breeding the master race or exterminated in the eugenics program. So do you seriously think that a system that produced this vehicle, then weaponized it on the civilian population in Chicago wouldn’t eventually do the same in your neighborhood?
I read about people like you in history. You fail to realize that the means of oppression you enable on one group will invariably be turned onto you. It’s a cliche at this point. For example, German women that supported the Nz party in order to go after minorities they didn’t like (gay, trans, Jsh, bl, etc) soon realized that they would be used for breeding the master race or exterminated in the eugncs program. So do you seriously think that a system that produced this vehicle, then wpnzed it on the civilian population in Chicago wouldn’t eventually do the same in your neighborhood? I had to misspell in order to post this
I read about people like you in history. You fail to realize that the means of oppression you enable on one group will invariably be turned onto you. It’s a cliche at this point. For example, German women that supported the Nz party in order to go after minorities they didn’t like (g, tr, Jsh, bl, etc) soon realized that they would be used for brdng the master rce or extmntd in the eugncs program. So do you seriously think that a system that produced this vehicle, then wpnzed it on the civilian population in Chicago wouldn’t eventually do the same in your neighborhood? I had to misspell in order to post this
Bro what exactly what "technical" about this? They got a marketing retard to talk about how great their stabilization is. Nothing about how good the actual vehicle is.
Ive always imagined a vehicle like this, high speed with lots of fire power. Need smokes to help evade if needed. Also need alternate escape hatches. Test it in heavy mud at various speeds. Make it shoot 25 mm so there’s compatibility with other existing rounds that can penetrate light armour.
That speed is cool and all but if you’ve ever been in an armored vehicle you know that they like to roll on turns. Will this actually perform on turns or will it roll?
@@EricKremer No it really doesn’t if it’s not worse than what already exists. You cannot nullify roll unless you make the track wider than an 8 lane highway at that mass.
@@carlosandleon clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. When it comes to why it is important to think about rollover mitigation. When you add more speed and have a top heavy vehicle, the vehicle will have a higher chance of rolling. Making that vehicle more dangerous to the soldiers inside.
This wouldn’t really be affective in a highly mechanize environment such as in Europe against Russia or over long distances such as the Pacific in China. This makes the most sense for an expeditionary force in places like the Middle East and Africa witch should be right up France’s ally
Well, the US too is looking to going towards a more agile, fast sort of troops and army as a whole, something like this would surely add to that. Having fast anmd accurate while on the move vehicles like this, but likely also a few heavier classes would well suit that. But i am guessing the US would like to make its own system/variants.
@@chinhphan4787 So, me saying guessing, and thinking them wanting their own variants because they might have different requirements since they're changing a lot in the military was too hard to understand ? The US educational system strikes again ?
@@chinhphan4787 Look at the supplier lists and volumes. Familiar names with long records of previous contracts. A company love the one here would have to partner, and even then, they’d be a source of concern to the acquisition people. Some of its based on sound reasons, but a lot of it is institutional culture.
@@honkhonk8009 see how they lanch the iranian drones that the ruzzian zorcs use to attack Ukraine...see how the chinese army lanche their swarm drones...
@@matthewgibbs6886relying on armor to save you should be a last resort. Your first reaction should be DONT GET SHOT AT and if you are shot at DONT GET HIT.
Just guessing but it probably lowers the profile of the vehicle to make it less visible? ... and when the gun is not in use it gets the gun out of the way where it is protected from anything from the elements to the enemy?
I'd assume less maintenance. The motorized components under the turret are protected when not in use. I'd assume with the turret tucked away, it will fair better during like a sand storm. I wonder if the components are accessible from the inside. Like while on the move, they can lower the turret and reload the ammo. That or maybe do minor maintenance.
It has no drone defenses. Drones will likely intercept this vehicle in today's conflict. It needs a directed energy laser as defense. The system should auto select targets for the human to approve.
needs a trophy anti-missile system if you put 4 guys amd a bunch of drones in it. at that that point the Rheinmetall bradley replacement starts to look more suitable to me.
Bruce Wayne: ''Does it come in black?''
hahahaha wkwk 😃😂👍
Lucious: "I'm assuming you've heard of paint and wraps Mr. Wayne?"
Hehehe
The gun even folds out.. just needs rockets
Niceee! 😂
Perfect for family road trips.
Or defending globalist property after they robbed you from everything you had.
I see a new episode of the Family Vacation movies coming up using one of these bad boys!
It is too expensive to buy and maintain. Also, you don't sell to most nations they would use on their own people.
There is a family of vehicles available
In somalia
"We know special forces operate in 4-6 man teams." Just imagine 3 of these passing you doing 100+ kph all 3 firing 25mm cannons at you with deadly accuracy.
It is far harder to coordinate six people spread across three vehicles than it is to coordinate six people in one vehicle.
@@buttsufancypantsu1644 ah yes because a single vehicle can be mounted with three 25mm guns right ?
@@ThunderkorpsI wasn't talking about armament at all, I was talking about why spec ops are inclined to work in teams of 4-6 rather than 2.
In what zesty universe do you need 6 people to operate one vehicle ?@@buttsufancypantsu1644
TeriFiing doudoudu
Is looks almost exactly like an EDF scout vehicle in Red Faction: Guerilla
Glad someone else thought so
i was thinking the same thing...
crime that the game doesnt have a threequel by now
the scout car was also a 2 door only as well
Life imitates art and those designs are sick af
Nice. Can I get it in blue? My wife says she wants our next car to be blue. We can keep the whole hidden turret thing between us and just tell her it's got a really intricate entertainment system. At least until I get cut off in traffic again, then it's "baby, push the red button for me"
This guy just yapping
@@thighg8744let him cook
LMFAO!
That is a very long joke
So, Megaforce is just around the corner, my fellow 80’s kids. Let’s get to work on the flying bike!
Oh hell yeah, that movie was my jam! Sooooo bad that it's good.
its effin go time!
Flying bike exists lol
Headbands were standard issue for the tactical BeeGees hairstyles 😂
The Delta Mark 4 Megafighter
that was very modest of him to also mention its limitations
or the fact that it can only just outrun a Humvee from 30 years ago.
@@richbob9155 either speed or agility, not both.
@@richbob9155 Humvee 113 km/h - Cockerill iX 200 km/h. The 120 km/h is while firing accurately at moving targets.
@@XazerizX THIS
@@richbob9155that's with the gun deployed and firing accurately. It can reach 200km/h with the gun stowed and en route to potential targets which is its strong point - interception
Seems like the kind of vehicle Rico would call in from an air drop in the Just Cause games.
There actually is in jc3
Half the fun of these videos is reading the comments to see the amazing insights of the undercover generals spending their day commenting on youtube videos, so many professionals sharing their enlightening ideas/opinions.
Its ever more fun to reads comment of buffoons , who somehow believe that everyone else is stupid and incompetent expect them.
Haha, yep. All I know is, I want one. :D
And why do you think that they should not be doing what they are doing?
Only the corrupted politicians and generals are allowed to think?
@@tuomaman2888 armchair general spoted, opinion rejected
@@tuomaman2888Please do not use the terms “corrupted politicians”.
Do not spread what is already there so we can keep it down from reaching more people.
My opinion as someone who spent too much time in armored vehicles. It’s very tight inside, the exterior is overly stylized, very poor visibility (windows are not a weak point like people think), the right seat screen appears to block a lot of visibility, two seat capacity (kind of odd). No spare tire, no external storage and limited internal storage (we carry lots of stuff(, no easy to swap grill guard.
The weapon choice is interesting. Too small for armored vehicles or hardened targets, not not really for infantry. So basically it’s effective for lightly armored vehicles? I think having a coaxial gun like a 240 would be beneficial, or the main gun as an M2 or GAU-19 would be more universal. The ammo drum would need a quick change capability too.
Just my two cents
As they say, it is more a proof of concept as a technology demonstrator. The company is specialized in designing turrets, not vehicles, and they usually adapt their turrets on all kind of chassis from other manufacturers. It is clear it needs lots of refinements based on actual requirements before being ready to be fielded.
How Windows are not weak points tho ? , windows will always be weaker than the armor , and that sounds like a weak point
@@ulforcemegamon3094 not really, you’d be surprised. Windows do really well.
Is it tall (high profile) with not much ground clearance or is the clearance larger than it appears?
@@mattshussett8063 I would hope the ride height is adjustable. Need decent clearance for normal use but not so much as to make it unstable at speed. I imagine it lowers a lot for higher speeds but who knows. We often drive. 55-65 on open dirt roads so we still need a decent amount of cleanse since the roads aren’t always smooth
I freaking want this in LA. Lol I would feel safe from that destruction durby.
GTA 5 LMFAO
I hear they have an Altima version coming out for that market
you would drive into a building before you enjoy
The way the turret rises and falls into the chassis is so futuristic and I'm all for it!
The fact that it lifts out of the vehicle and the barrel extends is straight out of a sci fi game
What if you switched the joystick to mouse and keyboard?
you'll have more precision
@@hby7768 but not Aim Assist 😄
I wish they do.
Imagine World War III started and everyone started recruiting gamers.😂
@doubleblocks3446 lol that would be an extinction level event with all the salty sweatiness in the gaming world 😄
@GNKGR7 you'll get kicked from the battlefield if you use aim assist 😏
Armed and armored sports car. I want one
That is one Gucci ass Land Rover.
Is Master Chief in the house! They just actually built your vehicle!
He helped spearhead the initiative
Warthog be like
@@JaSon-wc4pn looks more like a puma to me.
Cockerill should go for the Mauser MK-27mm auto cannon is light weight and extremely powerful and the 27mm bullet have the same power of a 30mm cannon and is a super fast bullet with many types already avaible in prodution and in big stockpiles they are used in many Fighter jets, Helicopter and naval applications, super quality materials, fast rate of fire that is selective for slower rates and great power, the best auto cannon avaible, and Europe specialy NATO should make a tender for a 15mm cannon to double the fire power of the.50 cal to deliver almost the same power of the 20x102mm and rival and surpess the 14.5x115 russian ammo from the KPV, they just need to use the case of the 20x110mm hispano with a 15mm bullet
But the 30mm shell is much more common, the lower rate of fire also allows higher acuracy and longer range
So... just use the 30mm of the Tiger, lightweight, compact, heavy punch.
@@hermes6910 thats a great solution for this support vehicle, the Nexter GIAT M781 is very light 66kg and have a high rate of fire and is already use in the Narwhal rws for maritime use. Great system they should use them.
It'd be nice to have a small fleet of these here at Texas.
a demilitarized version of that would sell like hotcakes in texas.
@@incubus_the_man Demilitarized? I'm sorry pal, but the stabilized 25mm autocannon stays on during sex.
be ready to file a bunch of paperwork with the ATF then.@in5320
@@incubus_the_man The demilitarized version of that would just be a bad idea.
@@incubus_the_man
If you demilitarize it, Texas will just put guided missiles on it, lol.
That has got to be the coolest combat vehicle I have ever seen.
The turret is absolutely gorgeous. I do find it crazy that mechanized infantry units don’t get the same kind of systems that fighter pilots get in their helmets. I know those things are crazy expensive but the tech would definitely be better in terms of on the ground awareness like the guy was saying. The pass through screens would allow for unobstructed 360 views around the vehicle through its body. But, if you have to get out then you’re kinda SOL.
I always expected modern MBT to includes these kind of helmet and allows the crews to see clearly from inside the tank, whats outside around it.
It’s always gorgeous until it’s being turned on you and your family. These weapons are way too advanced. If a fascist dictator comes to power in the U.S. or Europe, we are finished. There’ll no way to even dream of resistance. Between this, AI, robotics and surveillance.
It’s always gorgeous until it’s being turned on you and your family. These weapons are way too advanced. If a fcst dcttr comes to power in the U.S. or Europe, we are finished. There’ll no way to even dream of resistance. Between this, AI, robotics and surveillance, it’s just a matter of time before it’ll be weaponized on the domestic population.
@@xx133 1. Chill. 2. There are laws that would prevent an actual despot from remaining in power in the U.S. and other western countries. Even if it feels like the person in power is one. That’s why they separate the three branches of government. 3. Even if one does somehow take power you can’t act like a total coward and start pissing your pants while screaming “it’s over!” Even if a pilot is safe in his fighter jet, their family isn’t in that jet. Every enemy has a weakness, always.
is that an oscillating turret? i think it would be better if the turret can swivel upwards higher
This looks so drone friendly. Very effective target.
Real armies dont worry about drones, even Russia no longer worries about them as they gear up for real war.
At this rate we’re going to start misappropriating APS to stop kamikaze drones lmao
if it could track drones this would actually be a decent system
most companies have a modular turret set
so they probably have an AA version with better elevation
armchair general lmao
Need this for Chicago and other high crime areas
I read about people like you in history. You fail to realize that the means of oppression you enable on one group will invariably be turned onto you. It’s a cliche at this point. For example, German women that supported the Nazi party in order to go after minorities they didn’t like (gay, trans, Jewish, black, etc) soon realized that they would be used for breeding the master race or exterminated in the eugenics program.
So do you seriously think that a system that produced this vehicle, then weaponized it on the civilian population in Chicago wouldn’t eventually do the same in your neighborhood?
I read about people like you in history. You fail to realize that the means of oppression you enable on one group will invariably be turned onto you. It’s a cliche at this point. For example, German women that supported the Nazi party in order to go after minorities they didn’t like (gay, trans, Jewish, black, etc) soon realized that they would be used for breeding the master race or exterminated in the eugenics program.
So do you seriously think that a system that produced this vehicle, then weaponized it on the civilian population in Chicago wouldn’t eventually do the same in your neighborhood?
I read about people like you in history. You fail to realize that the means of oppression you enable on one group will invariably be turned onto you. It’s a cliche at this point. For example, German women that supported the Nazi party in order to go after minorities they didn’t like (gay, trans, Jsh, bl, etc) soon realized that they would be used for breeding the master race or exterminated in the eugenics program.
So do you seriously think that a system that produced this vehicle, then weaponized it on the civilian population in Chicago wouldn’t eventually do the same in your neighborhood?
I read about people like you in history. You fail to realize that the means of oppression you enable on one group will invariably be turned onto you. It’s a cliche at this point. For example, German women that supported the Nz party in order to go after minorities they didn’t like (gay, trans, Jsh, bl, etc) soon realized that they would be used for breeding the master race or exterminated in the eugncs program.
So do you seriously think that a system that produced this vehicle, then wpnzed it on the civilian population in Chicago wouldn’t eventually do the same in your neighborhood?
I had to misspell in order to post this
I read about people like you in history. You fail to realize that the means of oppression you enable on one group will invariably be turned onto you. It’s a cliche at this point. For example, German women that supported the Nz party in order to go after minorities they didn’t like (g, tr, Jsh, bl, etc) soon realized that they would be used for brdng the master rce or extmntd in the eugncs program.
So do you seriously think that a system that produced this vehicle, then wpnzed it on the civilian population in Chicago wouldn’t eventually do the same in your neighborhood?
I had to misspell in order to post this
Design brief: technicals, but marketable to countries with actual money
Bro what exactly what "technical" about this?
They got a marketing retard to talk about how great their stabilization is. Nothing about how good the actual vehicle is.
It's literally the car from Red Faction.
I've heard that some armoured mobility vehicles such as the bushmaster can get to this sort of speed on the open road
Let's go belgium, this looks amazing. Let's boost our ingenious arms industry some more!
Wasn't this exact vehicle in ubisoft's Ghost recon breakpoint game?
Ive always imagined a vehicle like this, high speed with lots of fire power. Need smokes to help evade if needed. Also need alternate escape hatches. Test it in heavy mud at various speeds. Make it shoot 25 mm so there’s compatibility with other existing rounds that can penetrate light armour.
I think it had alternate escape patches. Driver side and passenger side.
@@CyberKnightX211:28 roof looks too close to the turret to have any hatches
does it come with surround speakers and dab radio?
Damn I want this bodykit for my Volvo C40, just for safety purposes😅
That speed is cool and all but if you’ve ever been in an armored vehicle you know that they like to roll on turns. Will this actually perform on turns or will it roll?
does it even matter if all other armored vehicles roll anyway?
@@carlosandleon yes because the largest noncombat killer is rollovers. Speed is the main factor in 90% of rollover accidents. That is why it matters.
@@EricKremer No it really doesn’t if it’s not worse than what already exists.
You cannot nullify roll unless you make the track wider than an 8 lane highway at that mass.
@@carlosandleon clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. When it comes to why it is important to think about rollover mitigation. When you add more speed and have a top heavy vehicle, the vehicle will have a higher chance of rolling. Making that vehicle more dangerous to the soldiers inside.
Perfect for my next family trip to Chicago
This could significantly cut down my daily commute time on the freeway.. does it come with grenade launcher option? In case of heavy traffic ofc
Every American citizen should have one.
When I saw “Km” in thumbnail I immediately knew it’s not American
I will take four of them. They’d be great for rush-hour traffic.🤑
"Never could get the damn bridge to work but,...this baby works just fine!"
would love this in war thunder imagine a top tier r3
This wouldn’t really be affective in a highly mechanize environment such as in Europe against Russia or over long distances such as the Pacific in China. This makes the most sense for an expeditionary force in places like the Middle East and Africa witch should be right up France’s ally
we have a Citroen eC4 and driver led screen seems same
no its not
Perfect for cyberpunk 2077 with highway battles.
Unless it can outrun a drone or a missile, it will do about as much good as all the other vehicles.
Severely lacking in defensive capabilities, it's turret can't even go 360 degrees making it already obsolete against drones
Well, the US too is looking to going towards a more agile, fast sort of troops and army as a whole, something like this would surely add to that. Having fast anmd accurate while on the move vehicles like this, but likely also a few heavier classes would well suit that. But i am guessing the US would like to make its own system/variants.
Yep, the US has zero interest in dealing with companies like this.
So why do we have a bunch of JLTVs? 😂
@@chinhphan4787 So, me saying guessing, and thinking them wanting their own variants because they might have different requirements since they're changing a lot in the military was too hard to understand ? The US educational system strikes again ?
@@chinhphan4787 Look at the supplier lists and volumes. Familiar names with long records of previous contracts. A company love the one here would have to partner, and even then, they’d be a source of concern to the acquisition people. Some of its based on sound reasons, but a lot of it is institutional culture.
Kawasaki drones with shape charges that can be launched from the flatbed of a fast pickup truck seem more interesting.
Dude real life isnt fucking War Thunder lmfao
As a tank, your responsibility solely lies on supporting infantry.
@@honkhonk8009 see how they lanch the iranian drones that the ruzzian zorcs use to attack Ukraine...see how the chinese army lanche their swarm drones...
@@honkhonk8009 Thats not a tank and it doesnt carry many troops either
Interesting yes but also niche
@@honkhonk8009 How tf did you equate what he said with WarThunder, nothing he said has any relevancy.
I have always wanted one of these.
High speed vehicle meet high speed javelin
This stuff is so freaking cool.
and totally useless on a modern battlefield shell fragments will turn it in a sieve.
@@matthewgibbs6886 that's probably why you're not supposed to rush towards front lines with it
@@matthewgibbs6886relying on armor to save you should be a last resort. Your first reaction should be DONT GET SHOT AT and if you are shot at DONT GET HIT.
As soon as I get some chrome rims & a M242 bushmaster mounted on my Toyota Land Cruiser...I'm gonna put this company out of business 👌
What's the advantage of having the turret fold away like that?
Stealth, probably. It looks like a normal SUV at a distance until it doesn't. Good for insurgencies.
Just guessing but it probably lowers the profile of the vehicle to make it less visible? ... and when the gun is not in use it gets the gun out of the way where it is protected from anything from the elements to the enemy?
Cause it looks cool
center of gravity
I'd assume less maintenance. The motorized components under the turret are protected when not in use. I'd assume with the turret tucked away, it will fair better during like a sand storm. I wonder if the components are accessible from the inside. Like while on the move, they can lower the turret and reload the ammo. That or maybe do minor maintenance.
A 2-seater military vehicle is a non starter unless it flies...
once these hit the road Chicago will never be the same again
reminds me of the stuff from "command and conquer" back in the days
It has no drone defenses. Drones will likely intercept this vehicle in today's conflict. It needs a directed energy laser as defense. The system should auto select targets for the human to approve.
Great. Chicago Police should consider buying those.
If they make a four seater version with some cargo space, you'd have a nice recon/drone vehicle. Driver, gunner, drone op, commander/radio operator.
needs a trophy anti-missile system if you put 4 guys amd a bunch of drones in it. at that that point the Rheinmetall bradley replacement starts to look more suitable to me.
Great work Belgium!
“Select your target with the click of an eye” yes we are in the future lol
Is there an electric version available?
“Think out of the board” *literally thinks in the box*
"Take on somebody coming in that you dont want" - Everyone with a mother in law.
will be interesting to see if/how this fits into nation's defense doctrines
How much is this can’t wait to buy one
It looks cool and that's all that really matters.
how much without the cannon? and shipping to the US?
Its looks like ED-209.... "put ur gun down... u have 10s to comply....brrrrrttt" 😂
That's a very small combat vehicle. Did they build a miniature landscape for it at the firing range?
wow very cool. Im suprised this hasent been done earlier
Great sleek design
Your average suburban vehicle in the 21st century
Toyota pick already did this but the fact that this is the direction of innovation tells you everything you need to know
Asking my boss when I get to work - You wanna be the driver... Or Gunner? 🎉😂💨😈
The perfect grocery getter
Hey Bevis?
What?
"He said Cockerill"
"hehe huhe hehuuu"
Thats all great and all, how does it do on the Nürburgring?
Ooh, I want one!
Ah, so that's what the "LC-4 Coercion" from Ghost Recon Breakpoint is based on. Clever design!
can I get this with cognac leather and burl walnut
Now that's what I call an SUV.
A Toyota Helix with a browning m2 can do the same job for much cheaper
Add Rafael Samson RCWS for stability, no need for a dedicated vehicle
the US Department of Energy should look into this
So they can use it to catch UFOs?
I need to be a multi billionnaire buy a dozen of these, organize a hunger games battle royale in my backyard and watch this from my control tower
Great use of the chaingun. Like the humans still manning the guns.
Imagine this with a 50'cal. That would terrifying lmao.
Great commute vehicle for Chicago.
How well does it handle Anti-Tank Missiles?
Should install some sort of flame thrower off each side in the door handles for the car alarm system. 🤪👊
Just a few seconds after my last post he brought up that it is an A.I system!! LOL
Combat drones will love this thing. LOL
Where do you order this thing ?
I'm cancelling my Cyber truck order . . . And will take one of these instead :-)
The modern vehicle IRL is so much better looking battlefield 2042 XD
I like the look of this
I want one. Finally a transport that can take the pot holes in the Canadian Prairies. I will be available to test the civilian model.
The name cockerill does not instill fear at all
If a tank and a range rover had a kid
Well, I guess I know what's gonna be in the next Fast & Furious movie.😂😂😂😂😂😂
Muy lindo vehículo...
looks like a lambo