Laplacian computation example

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @CandidDate
    @CandidDate 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I've got a book on electromagnetics, but had trouble with the gradient, curl, divergence and Laplacian. I just binged these videos and now am ready to tackle these concepts. Thanks!

  • @shakennotstired8392
    @shakennotstired8392 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This series of videos are so unbelievably helpful in developing an intuition of the concepts involved and whys and hows; a sort of an real understanding in the sense that you can see it the your mind because you just know it. Thanks a million!

  • @z00ey
    @z00ey ปีที่แล้ว

    really well described and narrated - the visualisations were spot on! thx so much

  • @yuxiangwu4573
    @yuxiangwu4573 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Easy to understand. Nice video!

  • @photon7777777
    @photon7777777 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice, this pair of videos really helped me visualize the scalar laplacian :) Thanks.

  • @ExperimentLife
    @ExperimentLife 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have never heard of this! Neat

  • @djalmasimoes8442
    @djalmasimoes8442 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    great job.

  • @moozzzmann
    @moozzzmann 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Loved this video and the previous one

  • @ralstonrobertson6644
    @ralstonrobertson6644 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should consider employing the complete definition of gradient where a scalar function is converted to a vector function via the gradient process. This approach insures the extension to a 3-D vector situation. The application of the Divergence then takes you back to the scalar answer.

  • @citrarizqin
    @citrarizqin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much! This video helps me a lot!

  • @kim15742
    @kim15742 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow, I understand this!

  • @gloriacastaneda114
    @gloriacastaneda114 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!!!

  • @henrimartialmeke556
    @henrimartialmeke556 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Merci

  • @robertwilsoniii2048
    @robertwilsoniii2048 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is how you do it without infinite series’. Still not sure how you get boundary values though. I guess you would parametrize the boundary?

  • @yonghuiliew8066
    @yonghuiliew8066 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, is gradient of scalar function a vector function? For that, is Laplacian vector function as well?

    • @pritam_sadhukhan
      @pritam_sadhukhan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You've actually got 2 types of fields:
      1. A vector field (a vector as a function of space x,y,z)
      2. A scaler field (a scaler as a function of space)
      Now the gradient of a scaler field is a vector field.
      And divergence of a vector field is a scaler field
      So the Laplacian of a scaler field turns out to be a scaler field

  • @med-9official876
    @med-9official876 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which software are you using to draw the graphs?

  • @michaelmacdonald2907
    @michaelmacdonald2907 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    easy pezy. Thanks

  • @skandys9847
    @skandys9847 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could a 4d version of this be used to explain gravity?

    • @tomlowe6382
      @tomlowe6382 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Correct. This is a type of mathematics used in the physics of gravitational fields.

    • @SohamChakraborty42069
      @SohamChakraborty42069 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tomlowe6382 Could you explain how?

  • @davehumphreys1725
    @davehumphreys1725 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Given the chicken scratches, I can just about follow the maths. But, what on earth is the physical interpretation of the Lapacian of a gradient field? For that matter, what is the physical interpretation of the Lapacian of ANY vector field?

  • @JeaneAdix
    @JeaneAdix 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think this is the graphics program grant has been making for a while now. If you look at :12 you can see he's using Photoshop, whats going on with that?
    edit: nvm I see whats happening, he switched programs to Photoshop to write. I thought his program was in Photoshop and somehow he was manipulating 3d graph in Photoshop.

  • @tsraikage
    @tsraikage 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    oh. so thats how easy it should be. why my teacher loves to complicate everything?...