Lilium Jet | Cabin Design Series | Hear from Sharon

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 132

  • @yodouri6575
    @yodouri6575 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Really love the progress in PR as of late. This clear lead up to the type certification build is exciting.
    I'm not only impressed with the rigorous attention to safety with unmanned flights during your DOA verification but I feel good about the safety of the upcoming test pilot who will pilot the finalized version. You picked an amazing top-grade pilot too.

  • @Suro_One
    @Suro_One ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Really nice. I'm loving the aesthetics, the thought behind it and the modularity.

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@했제와그랬제-uDon't understand words?

  • @andrisoe1
    @andrisoe1 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    imagine, cheapcost regional air transport will boost mass people's mobility, land value in suburban area will increase along with their economic growth and in the same token it will resolve the urbanization problem in the big city/ies. Just wondering if i would still have time to witness it.

    • @robitwhisperr
      @robitwhisperr ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They're undertaking one of the largest global interruptions mankind has ever seen. It's a bit mind boggling to watch their progress.

  • @dalemsilas8425
    @dalemsilas8425 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The last time I had this burning feeling to own a thing this much was a PlayStation in the 90s.

  • @stefanweilhartner4415
    @stefanweilhartner4415 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    the scalability is an interesting point. battery technology is evolving. 500Wh/kg is available (Amprius,..., at a high price though). 700Wh/kg at the doorstep, 1000Wh/kg achievable in 5? years.
    the fans can be scaled up. more passenger with shorter range, less passengers with longer range.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding ปีที่แล้ว

      They can't just scale it up. The bigger it is, the worse the performance will be. They can barely fly the little prototype. It's the square cube rule of physics. This is a scam. They just fly a little toy

  • @timsonarius
    @timsonarius ปีที่แล้ว +5

    you guys are wizards 👍👍👍

  • @dtm6190
    @dtm6190 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    1:24 mark on the video. You might want to rethink the way the restraint system is designed and being worn. The buckle should be worn snugly and low in the lap and not on the lower chest. If the restraint buckle is worn above the belly button and you are in an accident there is a very good chance that your body will slide out underneath the restraint system and you will break your neck when your chin is stopped by the buckle. This is why most restraint systems similar to this one have 5 points of attachment and not 4. The 5th point is anchored directly between your legs which prevents the buckle from rising and your body squirting out from underneath the restraints. If you don't make the system idiot proof your passengers will not figure it out on their own. I have 23 years as a test pilot.

    • @makerofthings
      @makerofthings ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's been proven that waistline single-belted seats cause the most damage to an occupant during high velocity impacts and even provide more opportunities for spinal injury, particularly in the lower back.. the more surface area a restraint holds the more distribution an impact disperses evenly & thus minimizing damage to said occupants. Your pseudo science statement is patently incorrect & riddled with what appears to be low-brow imagination. Try to "squirt" a corrective action like deleting this brain dead comment.
      PS - You were never a test pilot (obviously) unless you legally classify as a test dummy and even then, experience didn't serve you here either.

    • @robitwhisperr
      @robitwhisperr ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You're not a test pilot.. 🙄

    • @kioly_ah
      @kioly_ah ปีที่แล้ว

      ​ @makerofthings who paid your job?

    • @dtm6190
      @dtm6190 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@robitwhisperr 31 years and 19 days in the US Army and retired as a CW5. AH-64 Test Pilot (yes, a maintenance test pilot and not experimental).

    • @dtm6190
      @dtm6190 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kioly_ah US Army for 31 years and 19 days and retired as a CW5. Flew from 1982 to 2010. Was a test pilot on AH-64's both A and D models. I was a maintenance test pilot and not an experimental test pilot. Before flight school I was in military intelligence as a 96D for a couple of years with a final rank of Specialist 5.

  • @us-tuontilohja6146
    @us-tuontilohja6146 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Good desing! 😎👍

  • @chesstictacs3107
    @chesstictacs3107 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    So many impatient people, “experts” everywhere.

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +8

      They're Joby bag holders 😂

    • @jay_stack1270
      @jay_stack1270 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      😂😂😂 ikr

    • @makerofthings
      @makerofthings ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@EarthCreature. 💯 % this right here. I see Joby fans are out to destroy Lilium by boosting their algorithmic spread. They're self defeating idiots 🤣

  • @stefanweilhartner4415
    @stefanweilhartner4415 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    now i want a sharon chung instead of a lillium jet. whatever, can't afford either of them.

  • @kfk256
    @kfk256 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    STOP STALLING, LILIUM TEAM!!!!
    START FLYING PASSENGER DEMO AND TAKE YOUR RIGHTFUL PLACE IN THE MARKET!
    ACT DECISIVELY BEFORE LESS APPEALING ONES MAKE YOU PLAY CATCH UP!!!!!
    WITHOUT PASSENGER FLIGHTS, IT'S JUST A MOVIE PROP.
    OR.... IS THERE SOME ISSUE YOU'RE NOT TELLING US SHAREHOLDERS?!
    WE ARE ROOTING FOR YOU!!!!

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +6

      They're not stalling

    • @kfk256
      @kfk256 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@EarthCreature. I certainly hope so. I want to see their jets ruling the regional skies. 😌

    • @TecnamTwin
      @TecnamTwin ปีที่แล้ว

      They can't do passenger flights without FAA or EASA certification so that's who you should be yelling at, not Lilium. I'm sure they're moving as fast as they can.

    • @kfk256
      @kfk256 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TecnamTwin Ok. But how are the other less compelling ones flying human demo without those certifications? Help me understand.

    • @Ozbird-72
      @Ozbird-72 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TecnamTwin This is WRONG: You can always to manned test flights under the experimental certification, even including passengers.

  • @forest42821
    @forest42821 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    A bubble with chairs is meaningless. Show us a meaningful aircraft that can carry payload and fly meaningful distance.

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're clearly mistaken. That's Joby & Archer you just described. You have the IQ equivalent of chilly room temperature

    • @frankyflowers
      @frankyflowers ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EarthCreature. if they can then why hasn't anyone on the planet earth ever proved it? they must not want their stock to multiply exponentially in a day.

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@frankyflowers Try to make sense before you make comments. Unsustainable stock growth isn't Lilium's mission. This stock isn't designed for you meme stock fools.

  • @jonpetter8921
    @jonpetter8921 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I saw a video about the noise level of Lilium compared to Joby. The test in that video showed that Lilium made a little more noise while taking off/landing compared to Joby. That s because of the way the fan is designed. Still the noise is lower than for instance helicopter, but is relatively high that it potentially can prevent Lilium to be able to take off and land in central areas. While the noise-test in that video may not be 100% accurate, noise can be a potential concern for Lilium or any other e Vtol for that matter.

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's a flat lie. Nor does that video exist and it's proven already the other way around. Joby is noisier than Lilium. They're open propeller blades. Everyone with any basic aeronautical background knows you're lying.
      Way to embarrass yourself.

    • @jonpetter8921
      @jonpetter8921 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EarthCreature. Why would I lie ? The video is out there on youtube.

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@jonpetter8921 Even if you legitimately saw a video lying to you, it's still flatly absurd. Most single propeller helicopters average 100 dB. Joby & Archer attempt multiples & attempt to quell concerns with their quiet-campaigns. Even 737 jets are quieter and the smaller the jet the quieter in dB it becomes.
      No open propeller will be quieter than Lilium's ducted jets. Thats not remotely possible in any knowledgeable mind spare the gullible you tried to lie to.
      Go sell your snake oil somewhere else. Its hilarious & you should be embarrassed 😂😂

    • @frankyflowers
      @frankyflowers ปีที่แล้ว

      that joby that they measured crashed and the motors are different on the new one so you don't know anything. lilium and joby are both scams and can't lift people for a few minutes. the sound doesn't matter because they don't work as a craft. the joby didn't have weight that makes it louder. the sound is a red herring. they can't fly empty for 5 minutes.

    • @frankyflowers
      @frankyflowers ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jonpetter8921 the video of the joby that crashed with motors that are different.

  • @TeddyLeppard
    @TeddyLeppard ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When will this start flying? As a stockholder I don't feel like we're getting a good sense of when service for these vehicles will actually start.

    • @TecnamTwin
      @TecnamTwin ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It already flies. They're in the process for FAA certification and have 700 pre-orders. Lilium Jet is poised to become the most successful and desirable eVTOL on the world.
      People like jets, not flailing propellers. That's why turboprops have largely fallen out of favor with the flying public.
      Lilium, not Joby, Archer, Vertical, Uber, or even Airbus, has that design & technology edge that will lead to high customer adoption rates. I predict great future success and Chinese copies.

    • @Ozbird-72
      @Ozbird-72 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would pull out and re-invest after the first 1000 hours of proven passenger transport operation.

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TecnamTwinOnly remote control prototypes have flown very short hops.
      This is not a jet. It uses ducted propellers.
      700 pre-orders, so letters of intent. Not a single one has been ordered. Certification for use is far off.
      The project will probably be canceled in a year or two, when the investors get fed up with the mock-ups and lack of actual progress.

  • @n1vca
    @n1vca ปีที่แล้ว

    I am sure it will be the least noisy aircraft in flight ever built, because with this much space and weight it will be unable to fly unless you change the entire design.
    And it is not a jet, just a simple ducted fan.
    I love the idea of electrifying aviation and some companies can actually fly their prototypes with people on board, which I don't see happening here with this design for the next 10 years, which will be tricky because the investors will most like not be with Lilium for so long, switching to a company that sets more realistic goals.

  • @wifjh32246
    @wifjh32246 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Hurry up and test the assembly, take off and manned!
    The cabin interior is simply not what the market wants to know right now!
    Can't take off and carry people, everything else is superfluous !
    The stock price keeps falling, and it keeps burning money

    • @wifjh32246
      @wifjh32246 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lovelovehappy0
      I also hope that the stock price will stabilize in the second half of the year. The stock price of 1-2 dollars is too exaggerated
      Since it was listed 2 years ago, it can drop from US$10 to as low as more than US$0.3. I thought it was going to be delisted. Almost 99% of investors are locked in this company and lose money.
      Recent investors have been hit by fundraising and have been stuck in a row

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@wifjh32246 It's a discount. Be thankful you can average down. No other eVTOL has Lilium's safety record or infrastructure progress nor the intrigue, MOU's or a better design.

    • @stefanweilhartner4415
      @stefanweilhartner4415 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      the wealthy people in dubai are exactly interested in the interior of the lilium jet. those are the people who already opened their wallets. they want to be picked up directly on the airfield of the airport after coming out of their suite in the a380 and need that air-taxi to fly directly to the roof top of their hotel or pent house.
      they payed first and will be served first. after that, lilium can address a wider market.

    • @wifjh32246
      @wifjh32246 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stefanweilhartner4415
      Can't fly, it's useless in a nice interior, isn't it?
      And the interior decoration waits until the customer makes an order and discusses with the customer
      And the interior has almost been filmed from previous videos.

    • @stefanweilhartner4415
      @stefanweilhartner4415 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wifjh32246 i saw it flying and a big customer already invested

  • @seebee216
    @seebee216 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Looks nice. Wonder if it will ever fly...

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You're obviously not paying attention

    • @TecnamTwin
      @TecnamTwin ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It already flies. They're in the process for FAA certification and have 700 pre-orders. Lilium Jet is poised to become the most successful and desirable eVTOL on the world.
      People like jets, not flailing propellers. That's why turboprops have largely fallen out of favor with the flying public.
      Lilium, not Joby, Archer, Vertical, Uber, or even Airbus, has the design & technology edge that will eventually make them a common sight in developed countries. Volocopter you say? Inefficient and ugly.

    • @Ozbird-72
      @Ozbird-72 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TecnamTwin You are mixing up stuff here: 1.) It is not flying, it is in very early prototype phase and has not completed one documented flight with passengers or even full payload under realistic conditions. 2.) Cargolifter had 200 pre-orders, those are letter of intends, not orders. 3.) Being "approved" for certification does not mean you will be certified. 4.) Lilium is not a JET, it is a ducted propeller system with many flaws aerodynimally 5.) Turboprops have not "failed" they are a very important part of aviation.

  • @iinchou_
    @iinchou_ ปีที่แล้ว

    微調整はプロペラの方が向いてそうだけど、ここまで来たら10年後にはこのデザインが主流になってほしい。

  • @Ozbird-72
    @Ozbird-72 ปีที่แล้ว

    The batteries are inside the structure? Can you state the charging time after a 30 Minute flight with full passengers and cargo? How do you cool the batteries?

    • @frankyflowers
      @frankyflowers ปีที่แล้ว

      the battery of the ones they flew for seconds long edited clips was a forklift battery in the cabin where the people should go.

  • @kioly_ah
    @kioly_ah ปีที่แล้ว

    Really good design though,
    but haven't heard any update on your battery technology from Lonblox.
    they are no experience deploying their product for any commercial product.
    also, your battery placing around the passengers,
    and Joby places battery at the motors and wings.
    could you show us what you think of the weight & balance of the combination in design?

  • @arcadealchemist
    @arcadealchemist ปีที่แล้ว +2

    hey we would have ZEPILINS still if it wasn't for the Hindenburg and people who like to smoke Cigarettes'
    personally i thin that fire was arson

  • @revisionfour
    @revisionfour ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Where are the videos of it flying with human occupants? It's all talk.

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're clearly a Joby bag holder. At least Lilium proves their prototypes don't crash BEFORE their manned flights. You half wit 😂😂

    • @forest42821
      @forest42821 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      All hypes still. They could have just put a couple luggage for the weights and remote pilot it for 100 miles to shut up all the doubters, but no, they rather keep talking more about cabin design. I have little doubt of Lilium is going down FFIE ‘s road to fast track to a bankruptcy.

    • @TecnamTwin
      @TecnamTwin ปีที่แล้ว

      Can't fly humans without FAA certification and that's the long and expensive process they're in right now with lots and lots of flight testing their prototype.

    • @revisionfour
      @revisionfour ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TecnamTwin I think all these flying car type vehicle companies need to stop putting out hype videos until they actually have a flying vehicle they can show videos of. I have seen prototypes at car shows for over like 5 years now. None of them actually fly. Anybody can make a fancy cabin that doesn't fly. They need to stop wasting time making videos until they can show something other people can't do.

    • @revisionfour
      @revisionfour ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lovelovehappy0 Why is Lilium different than all the other flying car prototypes that don't fly? So far they have done nothing other companies haven't done. Seeing is believing and it's been nothing burger after nothing burger.

  • @forest42821
    @forest42821 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Please, stop the “cabin” design hype. I’d rather hear how far and how much weight that flight test has achieved, not the all bs about luxurious regional cabin design on an air craft without wings.

    • @makerofthings
      @makerofthings ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Please stop whining. The interior is just as important as the design & capabilities which already passed all 4 DOA audits. There will be plenty of time to discuss ranges, vertiports & scalability

    • @forest42821
      @forest42821 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lilium hype is so similar to Faraday Future. Lots of interior cabin hype on a vehicle that never go to production and the company is on the road to bankruptcy. Chairs don’t fly and most people don’t care about the chairs. People care about aircraft fly worthiness, capability and cost. They have not demonstrated anything about range and capacity, which are extremely disappointed and worrisome after all these years of development.

    • @kioly_ah
      @kioly_ah ปีที่แล้ว

      ​ @makerofthings who paid your job? why you ruined every comment?

    • @TecnamTwin
      @TecnamTwin ปีที่แล้ว

      ​​@@forest42821Except Lilium is actually flight testing their jet for FAA and EASA certification. They're legit. And these aircraft are not for "most people." These videos are for their customers who've already ordered 700 Lilium jets and want to visualize how they'll use it.
      Faraday Future needs to be renamed Forever Future. They're not a scam, but their business model and execution of it both sucked from the start.

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@hdps0e928 💯 % these half wits are just amazing. Another one of these idiots tried to claim they were a test pilot 😂

  • @kurtneven6612
    @kurtneven6612 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ✌️

  • @bubbajones6907
    @bubbajones6907 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm glad to see you include trans women on your team. We need to see more companies like this.

    • @했제와그랬제-u
      @했제와그랬제-u ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ??

    • @makerofthings
      @makerofthings ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@했제와그랬제-uDo you struggle with English words?

    • @TecnamTwin
      @TecnamTwin ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@makerofthingsNo, but the comment still didn't make sense, hence the ??
      Gender confusion has nothing to do with Aviation. What you do and how well you do it is what's relevant, not how you perceive yourself. That's completely irrelevant and not helping Lilium achieve success.
      In fact, it could greatly hurt it. Budweiser and Target are learning that the hard way.

  • @Pilotkosinus
    @Pilotkosinus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    without a bad conscience because you no longer blow the petrol into the air yourself. the power plant is doing that now.

  • @willykang1293
    @willykang1293 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s nice, but I thought you would come to EAA AirVenture 2023 this time… hope to see you in real life next time.

    • @robitwhisperr
      @robitwhisperr ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They're busy making product. Maybe we'll see you grow up into an adult next time

  • @LegendLength
    @LegendLength ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Maybe a solution is to put the bullshit marketing on a 2nd channel and just have the good videos here :)

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +6

      We could say the same about commentators incapable of appreciation

    • @LegendLength
      @LegendLength ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EarthCreature. I apologize. I hope the next video features oprah.

    • @robitwhisperr
      @robitwhisperr ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@LegendLengthWhy? Is she going to reach under her chair & award you a winning personality? 😂😂😂😂

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@robitwhisperr LMAO ❤

  • @s.u.6198
    @s.u.6198 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    daily news about cabin Design.... don't talk about seats!!!
    it has to fly first!!!

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It already does and you know it does

    • @s.u.6198
      @s.u.6198 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@EarthCreature. some minutes... joby shares already earnd money... lilium lost 80% of my money.. but still talking about seats...
      xpeng is flying in public.... aso!

    • @makerofthings
      @makerofthings ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@s.u.6198 Joby crashed their plane this year. Hordes of uneducated retail crowds don't prove Joby will be successful in the global market. It's like you're stuck on stupid and can't do any proper research. Lilium is even quieter than Joby so the inner city taxi market they have planned won't ever be real and if it ever manages to start up, it won't take long to crumple. You really have to wake up from your delusions.

    • @goodcitizen9827
      @goodcitizen9827 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@s.u.6198 xpeng is a car company with a poorly built flying car gimmick. You really need to edit yourself because you're embarrassing yourself. Lilium is a multi-passenger flight vehicle capable scaling into economy flight status.

    • @makerofthings
      @makerofthings ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​​@@s.u.6198OH? Is that why analysts are suggesting you panic-sell your Joby stock while you have the chance, stating it has an unnaturally high stock price?.. especially after they crashed their craft this year? I surely hope you keep your money in and find out soon. They were just saying that days ago but please... be my guest and find out the hard way. Especially after the stupidity you're exhibiting. *please* make my day

  • @marcv2648
    @marcv2648 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    People who fly in private jets don't fly with shame or guilt hahahaha. The masses flying Ryan Air do.

  • @frankyflowers
    @frankyflowers ปีที่แล้ว

    can it lift 500lbs for 5 minutes? no.

  • @florianj6490
    @florianj6490 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    But does it really flies? No one knows...

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They passed all 4 DOA audits. You Joby bag holders keep whining & crying about the superior lead in the eVTOL industry every chance you get.
      Joby will never be able to catch up to Lilium's superior market, design or global interest.

    • @makerofthings
      @makerofthings ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Everyone can see it flies. Why can't you?

    • @stefanweilhartner4415
      @stefanweilhartner4415 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@makerofthings he is not bilnd. so, it must be the other thing called stupidness.

    • @makerofthings
      @makerofthings ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@stefanweilhartner4415 yep 💯 %

  • @Pilotkosinus
    @Pilotkosinus ปีที่แล้ว +4

    if i see someone in a turtleneck like that i know it's gonna be a scam

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You're just desperate to spread FUD

    • @goodcitizen9827
      @goodcitizen9827 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're not remotely intelligent. Steve Jobs introduced the iPhone in a turtleneck. Look what happened after that.

    • @stefanweilhartner4415
      @stefanweilhartner4415 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      like Apple?

    • @makerofthings
      @makerofthings ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A turtleneck introduced the iPhone.. so.. Maybe you need one to improve the validation of your brain dead comment?

  • @motodudu
    @motodudu ปีที่แล้ว

    Don’t fly with shame or guilt? I don’t think any of those private jets owners have that 🙄. Just sell and market, stop with the woke ideology. At the end of the day it’s those rich individuals who will be financing that vision to start with.

    • @frankyflowers
      @frankyflowers ปีที่แล้ว

      rich people are the ones that will be hoodwinked by this scam like theranos.

  • @EarthCreature.
    @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This type of methodicism for the interior design is what makes an assurance that the affluent in society will flock to purchase their own Lilium jet. Even then, you'll *STILL* see the Joby bag holders crying and finger wagging like they are now.

    • @octavicolom4562
      @octavicolom4562 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Is Lilium good for the zombie apocalypse though? I feel Joby would be good to chop up some heads with the tilting rotors, that is a massive advantage...

    • @makerofthings
      @makerofthings ปีที่แล้ว +7

      ​@@octavicolom4562lol.. joby is like an array of bird death

    • @goodcitizen9827
      @goodcitizen9827 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They love to hate Lilium & sing their songs of doubt every chance

  • @tarot-media
    @tarot-media ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Funny you guys are still wasting time on these endless cabin redesigns for a plane that can't fly more than 5 minutes.... Let me guess, next month you'll announce that you're changing the paint color and that it will cause the type certificate to be delayed another 2 years.

    • @EarthCreature.
      @EarthCreature. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're completely incompetent. They passed all 4 DOA audits & it's clear you don't understand what that means