لا اله الا الله وحده لا شريك له له الملك وله الحمد وهو على كل شيء قدير يحيي ويميت وهو الحي الذي لا يموت وأشهد أن محمداً عبده ورسوله 🕋☪️🤲🏻🇵🇸 الإسلام الدين الحق والقرآن الكريم رسالة الله
I wonder who got owned in marasesti, marasti and oituz🤔 is it possible that the glorious austrian military got destroyed by a tiny undersupplied army with no experience and was entirely stopped from pushing?
@@StackND I don't think those 3 battles mattered that much. It was Romania who wanted to join the war and its their fault that it had a tiny and undersupplied army. What was the result? Romania got occupied and had to do a seperate treaty with the Central Powers.
@@mcray79 mighty german war machine stopped by... Some farmers. You really want to make it seem like you managed to do anything other than march into half of the country with the combined power of three nations... And then fail to take the rest.
Thank you! A dude who knows history! Indeed Russia was supposed to help both Serbia and Romania but help never come and Russia turned into URSS. The good part is that both countries did better after the war until the coming of the second.....
@@krytiichyvak the most advanced you ever got was strapping multiple kalashnikov rifles to a single apparatus, calling it an "anti aircraft" gun and having the americunts kiss Ukraine arsenal about it.
I mean as a Romanian I don't think we did that bad... The Entente promised us before the war to land in Thessaloniki (northern Greece) in order to help but they didn't. Without that, Wallachia (that southern part of Romania) was pretty indefensible on account of you know, being surrounded on all sides by the enemy so of course we lost it. We managed to hold Moldova and stabilize the front until the Russian kicked the bucket, after that, no way in hell would we hold. I mean we have to have done something ok considering the Germans had to send von Mackensen to bail the Austro-Hungarians out.
@@christiankurtiqi5992 Depends what you call a flag. National flags originated in the maritime trade and for the longest time were not used anywhere else and Austria-Hungary did have a civil ensign
@@desran4447 Because they were practically two countries, only in personal union, so officially there was the kingdom of austria (black and yellow flag) and the kingdom of hungary (red white green) used as national flags
@@austria-hungary7680 In 1878 rusii au luat Buceagul dand in schimb Dobrogea, granita de sud nu a fost delimitata urmand sa se faca la masa tratativelor. Romania dorea aceasi suprafata pe care rusii au furat-o in 1878, astfel ca acel sud de Dobrogea era practic paritatea la schimb. Dar rusii intentionat au lasat sudul neimpartit, se ghidau dupa ,,divide et impera,,.
@@USA_G0vernment no bruh did u know russian empire was really poor starving to death all people and soldiers realllyyy bad equiped while german empire had the best military and russian empire had to fight german empire austria-hungary bulgaria and ottoman
@@USA_G0vernmentthen your comment becomes if russia was stronger central power would lise, which is a stupid comment in the first place. russia was in a bad situation even before the revolution
@@USA_G0vernmentRussia was very poor when WW1 started, they lacked food, ammunition,... Russia would lose this war sooner or later. Not to mention they had to fight almost all the central powers (Germany, Austria, Bulgaria, Ottomans) they couldn't import food because both Germany and Ottomans controlled the banticl sea and the black sea.
Damn, that last quote was so hard hitting >Comrades, the workers and peasants revolution, the necessity of which was repeatedly stated by the bolsheviks, IS COMPLETE
@@SUBSUR48 Слова немецкого агента, пришедшего с немецкой идеологией и за немецкие деньги развязавшего войну, в которой погибло от 5 до 10 миллионов человек...
@@Bialy_1 1. Пруфы. 2.1. И? 2.2. Романовы такие: 😅 2.3. Еврейская вера в Иисуса, которая и легитимизировала власть царя: 😂 3. Первыми вооруженные столкновения и белый террор применили... белые!
@@Bialy_1 будут пруфы? Европейцы от него избавились из-за того, что его пропаганда наносила им серьезный ущерб. Не без его помощи в Европе начинается рабочий движ. А немцы его перевозили в закрытом вагоне лишь для того, чтобы он не дизморалил немецкие войска.
Great Retreat is truly the greatest event in history of my country Serbia. What our great grandfathers have survived for us to be able to have freedom is something we will cherish and celebrate until the end of time. SLAVA IM!
@@RussianEmpire-133 no exaggeration, Russia's situation was bad anyway, even though they had more troops and Romania's territory was mainly defended by the Romanian army and from what you can see here, Romania probably lasted longer than Russia
It really does go to show the power of the Russian Empire. Yes, their country collapsed and they lost a lot of land, but they were an unstable power, with underdevelopment in many aspects of the country, and had a border with all central powers country except Bulgaria, and held the line against the most powerful militaries in the world. In the situation they were in, they did phenomenal. Germany was in it's absolute prime a country that even Britain had fears about.
Meh, Ottomans are the most impressing in this war. Russia had numbers, at least, while ottomans had like 4-5 fronts, that they were holding for 4 years. Ottoman empire outlived Habsburg, German, and Russian empires.
@@sircatangry5864 Ottoman empire outlived the Russian German and Habsburgs because ottomans were already failing and no one saw them as a strong empire .Allies were more focused on germany and Habsburgs. firstly the ottoman empire wasn't a threat at all even tho they were holding multiple fronts .( not even holding they lost most of it ) The only impressive thing they did was manage to fight war despite their situation
немцы всегда умели воевать и это не то что они сильны или мускулистые они дисциплинированные и это было самое главное как говорится немцы это римские легионеры второй мировой войны вспомните когда римская армия смогла победить с 80 тысяч против 250 -300 тысяч галлов вот так же и третий рейх против ссср успешно воевали хотя в итоге проиграли.
Romania still existed as a country and managed to withstand some major offensives, in the end it played out well for them. tough decisions in tough times. but correct decisions. keep in mind that Romanian Monarchy in that time was of German origin, but still had the historical balls to decide to side with the allies.
@@creepquest It is, Finnish Reds began their own uprising after the revolution in Russia and the country was plunged into a civil war, it could have even turned communist if not for the German invasion which massively helped the local White forces. Russian Empire and Finland had a rough relationship in the last decades before the fall, some Finns even went to Germany to fight on their side in the war, but at least it was peaceful
The german giant land grab at the end was what lost them the war. They could have had millions more soldiers on the west, by just settling with limited privileges to secure their supplies rather than actually controlling those lands that required so much occupation manpower
Thats not what lost them the war and relocating those soldiers (many of which they did, and more were on the way) wouldnt have changed the result because unfortunately britain was blockading germanys ports which starved the country and all the civilians and as a result the army. They had no choice but to surrender. What they shouldve done was relocate more experienced soldiers from the east to the west during their early successes against russia because they did more with less soldiers so they shouldve only kept enough there to make steady gains or keep the russians at bay. I agree they were a bit greedy though but you have to understand the era ww1 was in. Everyone was greedy. Land and territory mas very important. Germany was actually one of the least greedy states. They had to secure the lands in the east or else russia or the ussr could rearm gather their bearings and launch an counteroffensive much easier
@@982-o4e could have traded with who? Ukraine was in total chaos with a complete breakdown of central authority. The Germans knew if they Ukraine was left to its own devices it would be torn apart by anarchists, communists, monarchists, and social democrats. Which is exactly what happened when they withdrew.
@@cmt6997 i guess i underestimated the situation in the east then. it seems like the germans are destinated to lost the war no matter what they could have done and that will cause the 2nd world war, they are deemed to lose everything no matter what they choose in a history after 1914. how sad
Anyone know why the Germans/Austrians/Bulgarians never finished occupying Romania after it surrendered? I can see their soldiers disappear but the remaining land stays blue for the rest of the war.
ww1 wasn't really like ww2 in thar it was fighting to the bitter end everywhere with one big treaty. Some countries signed treaties that got them out of the war early
The fact that serbia lasted that long against the austrians is actually very impressive! (Yes i do know the austrians was in a very bad situation at the time)
@@austria-hungary7680I mean like you can not just forget a massive country like the Ottoman Empire joined the war? And they did fight with the British in the Egypt and stuff…
But Ottomans lost at Caucasus and was pushed back, same at Egypt, at Iraq territory when British troops landed there for defend Persian oil, and other stuff, and when they was failed at Caucasus, they started kill armenians, that more than 1.300.000 people died from this genocide, So only thing what ottomans did is fighting vs some of British troops, so ottomans don't was such big trouble for Any country at this war, only for British, but not for so long.
Получить что-то должны были большевики, которые отказалась выплачивать долги РИ и подписали сепаратный мир с центральными державами? Убийственная логика
Россия не была оккупирована, Россия была в состоянии продолжать войну, просто большевики решили заключить мир, так как войска были нужнее для гражданской войны
I advise you to familiarize yourself with the Brusilov breakthrough (1916). This is one of the most important operations of Russia, thanks to which the French were able to win the Battle of Verdun. Now it can be hard to believe that we helped each other.
Yea these days they are invading to protect their people in eastern ukraine. I don't support either side of the war but ukraine fucked up big by not honouring the minsk agreement.
Man I just realized this if Russia didn’t attack German empire and just built there economy and help with stopping the revolts usa and Russia will still be friends
O Apetite dos americanos é voraz, eles não tem amigos, a guerra atual não é para atacar a Rússia, os Liberais americanos estão afundando a Europa. A Alemanha lutar contra a Rússia é uma loucura que nunca favoreceu esses países e sim os Anglos.
@@rafael-flu5602The British managed to pit the Russians and Germans against each other. The Alliance of the Three Emperors, which posed an incredible threat to Britain, but protected the interests of both the Germans and the Russians, was to be preserved. Then the story would have gone completely differently...
@@victordegtyarev1006A guerra da Ucrânia hoje é a continuação da mesma política, causar rupturas entre russos e alemães, o financiamento de Hitler pelo ocidente também esperavam que Hitler atacaria apenas os Russos.
The US and Russia would never be friends. The Empire was a murder machine uncaring for its own people and leading to the death of all of Russia. Even if it hadn't fallen however, the US and Russians would either have differing goals and would be enemies, or the Russians would be under the control of the US.
Amazing how much more troops Russia had and still lost the war. This really shows that numbers don't necessarily means that these troops are well equipped
The bro is confusing the words. "equipment" and "revolution" are completely different concepts. Russia did not violate international treaties and did not use gas + Russia fought on 3 fronts, and the Eastern Front was too long to defend it. If you knew at least something about the tactics of warfare, you would understand why in 1915 the Russian Imperial Army retreated and gained a foothold, holding the defense for 2 years. Your comment shows us the level of education in the USA xd
@@MisterEvrey Russia fought on 1 front only. The Ottoman front is in the mountains so it was hard to defend. The Russian military was completely and utterly devastated by the numerically inferior German and Astro-Hungarian forces.
@@MisterEvrey Small and insignificant fronts. The Russians had no play in tthe defeat of the Ottoman Empire. It was entirely Allied victory. Russia lost the war and was humiliated
No, in 1922, the White Russian Army existed. This means that Russia won the First World War, because the White Army did not recognize the shameful Brest peace.
Во-первых: Россия практически всегда побежала в войнах, в которых участвовала. Во-вторых: численное превосходство мало что даёт, если твоя армия более устаревшая и менее обученная, чем у врага.
@@seiro8606 В ПМВ с обоих сторон воевали по большей части мобики без какого-либо опыта войны, и, соответсвенно, приобритали они его тоже более-менее одновременно с обоих сторон. Гораздо большую роль сыграли вещи более банальные - количество и качество артиллерии и путей сообщения. Перед войной в немецком генштабе боялись, что если Российская Империя завершит (иронично) запланированное закончиться в 1917 году перевооружение, то её будет невозможно победить. Очевидно, что за такой короткий срок нельзя внезапно научиться хорошо воевать, зато что можно, так это наладить производство всех необходимых для современной войны вещей и накопить их приличный запас
Чел, Россия проиграла не Германии, она проиграла большевикам. Если бы не предатели в феврале и октябре 1917 года - Германии не видать победы над Россией как и высадки в Британии. Это доказывает хотя бы то, что до революций при самых худших условиях - немцы не продвинулись дальше Польши.
@@СтариГенералътак даже до двух революций 1917 года Русская императорская армия гораздо чаще отступала, как в 1915, чем наступала, как во время Брусиловского прорыва летом 1916. И это при том, что имела подавляющее численное превосходство над немцами, вдобавок у немцев был ещё второй большой фронт на западе, а у России мелкий Кавказский фронт. И вдовесок немцы обеспечивали себя сами, а царь выезжал на западном лендлизе, впрочем как и Сталин во второй мировой войне. Без западной помощи и западного второго фронта ни цари, ни большевики не выдержали бы натиска немцев, невзирая на колоссальную разницу в численности населения и мобилизационного ресурса.
Actually not correct. The flag he's using was never actually implemented as Russia's flag, it was only proposed. Russian Empire just used the standard whote-blue-red flag during WW1.
Как раз наоборот. Россия смогла выстоять под ударами немцев в условиях снарядного голода. А после даже провести столь масштабное наступление, какого союзники до 1918 года сами смогли провести. Проиграла Россия только из-за предательства либералов-демократов и коммунистов, устроивших две революции во время войны.
Ти абсолютно правий. У Росії завжди була біда з головою. Не забувай, Росія втратила в Першу світову більше всіх інших, воювавши на півтора року менше за інших. А цей недолугий москаль традиційно звинувачує у всьому демократів і більшовиків. Він не може додуматися своїми мізками, що в поразці Росії і в лютневій революції винний лише цар Микола перший, який в березні відрікся від престолу, що ввергло його імперію в хаос. Також цей москаль досі не знає, що так звана жовтнева революція була військовим переворотом лише в Петрограді. І, ти уявляєш, зараз Московська церква канонізувала того ідіота Миколу в святі православні! Отака тобі безголова Росія з темним народом.
@@СтариГенералъ The Romanovs sent millions to die without so much as a care. The traitors were the imperialists, the communists were the patriots. Romanov Russia could never have reached the wealth and power of the Soviets, and Oligarch Russia is a pathetic shadow of the USSR, where little girls became prostitutes and little boys became heroin dealers in the 1990s
It was a lot of factors that basically doomed the Russians from the start, a non-existent military industry, weak and unpopular government, some of the worst commanding officers in history frankly (with notable exceptions), and a horrible lack of infrastructure to properly supply a modern war. Russia was an 18th century country fighting a 19th century war and lost badly because of it
For those who don't get what happened: In 2017 March there was a February Revolution in Russia, The Provisional Goverment defeated Emperor Nikolai II. But The Provisional Goverment got upset. They failed their operation on the front in July, and In October, communists defeated Provisional Goverment and stopped the war on Eastern Front.
Because the flag were combined Austria & Hungarian is not official, and they represent that because Austria is suffering Low stability to its people...
Ну так если вы откроете учебник истории, а не ограничитесь одним видео с картой на Ютубе, то поймёте, что это так. Немцы не нанесли поражения России. Армия России была уничтожена двумя революциями в феврале и октябре 1917. Сами же немцы не смогли прорвать фронта и ту же Польшу заняли во многом потому, что русские сами её оставили из-за снарядного голода 1915 года, стабилизируя и выравнивая фронт.
@@СтариГенералъреволюции 1917 года не на ровном месте возникли, а являлись прямым следствием недовольства населения происходящим. А население было возмущено вследствии бесконечной мобилизации на бессмысленную войну хер пойми куда ради амбиций поехавшего царька. Вот даже по видео заметно, что русские постоянно превосходят немцев в 1.5-2 раза, почему же они чаще отступали, чем наступали? Хотя Россия воевала на 2 фронта (один большой Восточный и один маленький Кавказский), а немцы воевали на 2 больших фронта (восточный и западный) и кучу маленьких в африке и Азии. И даже при таких обстоятельствах Россия не могла продвинуться вперёд. Даже после псведоудачного брусиловского прорыва немцы через пару месяцев отбили территории. И как население России должно было на все это реагировать? Так что российское военно-политическое руководство само виновато в революции.
@@diamondvankiessling8869 Октябрьская революция стала следствием бардака, учинённого Временным Правительством. Временное Правительство же выехало во многом за счёт удачи, ибо февральская революция по большей части делалась только в Петербурге, не поддержанная остальной частью России. Революционерам повезло, что царь был на фронте, революционерам повезло, что царь поверил в их угрозы про "арестованную семью", революционерам повезло, что толком в Петрограде не было сил, способных быстро навести порядок и так далее. Февральская революция как раз-таки не была столь основополагающая в своих причинах.
@@СтариГенералъ аналогичный ответ, никаких революций бы не случилось, если бы война складывалась иначе. Нужно было либо быстро громить немцев и продвигаться вглубь, учитывая, что численное превосходство позволяло, либо вообще не воевать и заключить какой-нибудь мирный договор и заниматься своей страной, ибо там проблем было выше крыши. А так вырыли немцам и австро-венграм яму, и сами в неё первыми попали. Первыми, потому что немцы в конечном итоге тоже истощились, как и задумывалось, но на полтора года позже (в ноябре 1918), но для России уже было поздно.
Даже если бы не Гражданская война мы бы всё равно проиграли, особенно с Николаем II , но для нас это всё равно гражданская война оказалась лучшим исходом
Какой ценой? Если бы не предательская октябрьская революция, то Россия бы вышла победителем в 1 мировой войне и возможно не появилась бы Германия под руководством фюрера.
@@Slavic_union Оттуда, что Германия вела войну на 2 фронта под морской блокадой, а все два её союзника терпели поражение за поражением. К тому же 6 апреля 1917 в войну вступили США, 18 мая в них началась мобилизация в армию 1 миллиона человек. Всё, что нужно было для неминуемой победы это продержаться в войне до следующей весны, когда новоприбывшие американские дивизии сломают многолетний паритет западного фронта и позволят союзникам нанести решающий удар (что не произошло в реальной жизни, потому что весной 1918 Германия, осовободившая собственные дивизии с восточного фронта, вела уже своё наступление, которое американцам ещё сначала пришлось останавливать). Никаких военных причин почему этого сделать было нельзя не существовало, обороняться в ПМВ было несравнимо легче, чем наступать, траншеи давно уже были вырыты, не было и намёка на немецкое наступление, которое если бы и произошло тут же было бы использованно союзниками чтобы ударить на западе, с которого нобходимо было снять дивизии для прорыва на востоке. Коммунисты вышли из войны исключительно по политичсеким причинам - они пришли ко власти на штыках трусов и дезертиров, которые были готовы махать любой красной тряпкой, лишь бы им пообещали, что их не отправят на фронт. Потом, конечно, это обещание было нарушено - большевики закрепившись у власти назад всех мобилизовали для гражданки, только вот к тому моменту у них уже не было ни штыков ни ружей чтобы считаться с их мнением, а для дезертиров и трусов вернули расстрелы
@@TesticleTortureGaming I do not remember the German troops in St. Petersburg (Leningrad) or in Moscow. But I do know for sure that Russian troops were in Berlin twice. So you should double-check your knowledge of history.
@@Leantenant okay, please educate me then. What was the second time the Russians took Berlin? At least we can agree that Germany owned Russia in the first world war, right? Even though they didn't capture Petrograd or Moscow, they still won the first.
ww1 started by the rus that backed up the slavs of serbia knowing that it would cause a german backup for austria ww2 started by the rus that had major interest to take a huge chunk of poland and make entire europe bolshevik (they fought wars within 1919, 1920 etc while ww1 was already over ww3 started by the rus that attacked ukraine? Tell me what you want the rus expansion plans were always a major part of the wars without them it wouldnt have been world wars and the first one would have been won by the germans. history books only show the war declarations not the cause of the declarations and alliance system.
@@RussianEmpire-133войну с Наполеоном 1812 года целиком и полностью оплатила Британия, используя крепостных России как пушечное мясо и торпеду на французов, а во второй мировой войне лендлиз официально был задокументирован 1 октября 1941, на 4-й месяц войны, и британские танки уже отражали атаку Вермахта под Москвой. Потом поставки западного оружия только возрастали уже в 1942-1943.
@@diamondvankiessling8869 ну так факт в том , что те самые крепостные и выиграли Наполеона . Что именно оплатила Британия?Британцы трусливо сидели на своих островах в блокаде , в то время как русские шли вперёд , а уже когда мы подходили к Парижу она решила "присоединиться". За 3 месяца Вермахт уже оккупировал до хрена территорий Совка пока "Союзники" не решались на чью сторону встать , но когда увидели , что мы выиграли битву за Москву , то поняли весь потенциал и решили вместе Вермахта качать Совок .
![일상 속 기분 좋음 [Proto disco meme]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DwmEIaZ7XGQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Full version including all fronts linked above the caption!
/\_/\
(. )
/→🎉
How do u make numbers of troops move that fast
لا اله الا الله وحده لا شريك له له الملك وله الحمد وهو على كل شيء قدير يحيي ويميت وهو الحي الذي لا يموت وأشهد أن محمداً عبده ورسوله 🕋☪️🤲🏻🇵🇸 الإسلام الدين الحق والقرآن الكريم رسالة الله
f
@@Star-coveri believe he was using 2x speed but i dont know how he did the moving flags and the colored area expanding
East: 🏃♂️💨
West: 🐌
lol
True
Italian Front:🐢
@@CryptedDataaantartica front: 🦥
No
I love how Romania joined the war and immediately got owned.
😂
Bro got obliterated 😭🙏🙏
I wonder who got owned in marasesti, marasti and oituz🤔 is it possible that the glorious austrian military got destroyed by a tiny undersupplied army with no experience and was entirely stopped from pushing?
@@StackND I don't think those 3 battles mattered that much. It was Romania who wanted to join the war and its their fault that it had a tiny and undersupplied army. What was the result? Romania got occupied and had to do a seperate treaty with the Central Powers.
@@mcray79 mighty german war machine stopped by... Some farmers. You really want to make it seem like you managed to do anything other than march into half of the country with the combined power of three nations... And then fail to take the rest.
Romania: TIME TO GET BACK TRANSYLVANIA
Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria: No
Hungry?
@@ContentDeleted01Austria hasn’t eaten anything today
Who said "no" in 1919?🥰
Treaty Of Trianon: Not So Fast, Hungary!
@Tovalokodonc cry cry
“All Quiet on the Western Front”
“All Noisy on the Eastern Front”
EDIT: So much likes for a cheap joke that appeared in my head randomly🤑🤑🤑
Lmao
I'd like to see that film
Is there actually a film for the Eastern front???
İts true💀
@@JianCLVyea I think so
Balkans at the end:
🇷🇸🇷🇴: Where the fuck is Russia
🇩🇪: So about that..
Soviet Union: Uhhhh.. I can Explain..
Россия пропала
Появились советы
Thank you! A dude who knows history! Indeed Russia was supposed to help both Serbia and Romania but help never come and Russia turned into URSS. The good part is that both countries did better after the war until the coming of the second.....
@@darthwolfius7746да, если бы не революция, Россия им обязательно помогла бы.
@@jtlolzz,RSFSR
The numbers were insane, a quarter of their size is more than all the Russia-Ukraine troops
Indeed but we have much more advanced technology now
@@krytiichyvakno. You have not, just West is giving you all your weapons
@@mutlugameofhalitWe arent talking about NATO
Yes, azov have advanced technology, but they use it to donetsk citizen.
@@krytiichyvak the most advanced you ever got was strapping multiple kalashnikov rifles to a single apparatus, calling it an "anti aircraft" gun and having the americunts kiss Ukraine arsenal about it.
they literally just ANNIHILATED romania
no more bikes stolen
@@Yourlocalwordrobe no more mona alcohol😭😭
No more bumpers stolen
no more wallets stolen
I mean as a Romanian I don't think we did that bad... The Entente promised us before the war to land in Thessaloniki (northern Greece) in order to help but they didn't. Without that, Wallachia (that southern part of Romania) was pretty indefensible on account of you know, being surrounded on all sides by the enemy so of course we lost it. We managed to hold Moldova and stabilize the front until the Russian kicked the bucket, after that, no way in hell would we hold. I mean we have to have done something ok considering the Germans had to send von Mackensen to bail the Austro-Hungarians out.
Finally, somebody who uses the correct Austrian flag for the time.
Austria-hungary had no official flag
@@christiankurtiqi5992yes and he said austrian
@@christiankurtiqi5992 Depends what you call a flag. National flags originated in the maritime trade and for the longest time were not used anywhere else and Austria-Hungary did have a civil ensign
@@desran4447 Because they were practically two countries, only in personal union, so officially there was the kingdom of austria (black and yellow flag) and the kingdom of hungary (red white green) used as national flags
@@Mayabichi And yet those "two countries" used one civil ensign
Crazy how Austria and Bulgaria were expecting romanian invasion
It was kinda obvious because Romania had claims in Hungary, and Bulgaria also did have claims in Romania
@@migueltorrejon2301 You mean southern dobruja which romania stole just the year prior.
@@austria-hungary7680 In 1878 rusii au luat Buceagul dand in schimb Dobrogea, granita de sud nu a fost delimitata urmand sa se faca la masa tratativelor. Romania dorea aceasi suprafata pe care rusii au furat-o in 1878, astfel ca acel sud de Dobrogea era practic paritatea la schimb. Dar rusii intentionat au lasat sudul neimpartit, se ghidau dupa ,,divide et impera,,.
@@austria-hungary7680 astfel ca romanii nu au furat nimic, bulgarii refuzau orice negociere de trasare a granitelor!
The Bulgarians were more like hoping for Romanian invasion
WW1: Eastern Front success, Western Front failure
WW2: Western Front success, Eastern Front failure
@@USA_G0vernment no bruh did u know russian empire was really poor starving to death all people and soldiers realllyyy bad equiped while german empire had the best military and russian empire had to fight german empire austria-hungary bulgaria and ottoman
@@USA_G0vernmentthen your comment becomes if russia was stronger central power would lise, which is a stupid comment in the first place. russia was in a bad situation even before the revolution
@@USA_G0vernmentRussia was very poor when WW1 started, they lacked food, ammunition,... Russia would lose this war sooner or later. Not to mention they had to fight almost all the central powers (Germany, Austria, Bulgaria, Ottomans) they couldn't import food because both Germany and Ottomans controlled the banticl sea and the black sea.
@@USA_G0vernment then if germans had infinite supplies and soldiers, they could conquer the earth.
well they only can choose one
Damn, that last quote was so hard hitting
>Comrades, the workers and peasants revolution, the necessity of which was repeatedly stated by the bolsheviks, IS COMPLETE
Слова Ленина
@@SUBSUR48 Слова немецкого агента, пришедшего с немецкой идеологией и за немецкие деньги развязавшего войну, в которой погибло от 5 до 10 миллионов человек...
@@Bialy_1
1. Пруфы.
2.1. И?
2.2. Романовы такие: 😅
2.3. Еврейская вера в Иисуса, которая и легитимизировала власть царя: 😂
3. Первыми вооруженные столкновения и белый террор применили... белые!
@@Bialy_1 будут пруфы? Европейцы от него избавились из-за того, что его пропаганда наносила им серьезный ущерб. Не без его помощи в Европе начинается рабочий движ. А немцы его перевозили в закрытом вагоне лишь для того, чтобы он не дизморалил немецкие войска.
Essas palavras são a mesma coisa de uma declaração de desistência
Great Retreat is truly the greatest event in history of my country Serbia. What our great grandfathers have survived for us to be able to have freedom is something we will cherish and celebrate until the end of time. SLAVA IM!
You forgot to mention what we should never forget, greatest backstabbers of all time, Bulgarians.
Ссср
Слава
@@Снг-щ8еi would rather live in the USSR than in crazy germany
At least this guy uses the (closest) actual Austro-Hungarian Imperial flag.
Hapsburg Monarchy flag.
.
I am not the only who noticed the offensive in the Balkans in the end, right?
Everyone notice
How do you think bulgaria and the Ausrians surrender?
@@austria-hungary7680 i was just expecting someone to joke about it, which i didn't see, saying like "giving in the front and taking in the back"
@@rodrigofernando2987 ohh
Vardar offensive iirc
Eastern fronts,russia:im always alone
Romania?
@@eh2587Румыния нам сделала только хуже вступив в войну , что сразу уничтожило Румынию и открыла нам новый фронт .
@@RussianEmpire-133 no exaggeration, Russia's situation was bad anyway, even though they had more troops and Romania's territory was mainly defended by the Romanian army and from what you can see here, Romania probably lasted longer than Russia
@@Jeff_Reyxromania signed an agreement to cease hostilities immediately after russia left the war, what are you talking about?
Это ничего не меняет@@RussianEmpire-133
People: dies from a war new people: yall are going into my animation 😂
It really does go to show the power of the Russian Empire.
Yes, their country collapsed and they lost a lot of land, but they were an unstable power, with underdevelopment in many aspects of the country, and had a border with all central powers country except Bulgaria, and held the line against the most powerful militaries in the world.
In the situation they were in, they did phenomenal. Germany was in it's absolute prime a country that even Britain had fears about.
Germany twice became the strongest military power and both times Russia managed to hold back the pressure of the Germans...
Meh, Ottomans are the most impressing in this war.
Russia had numbers, at least, while ottomans had like 4-5 fronts, that they were holding for 4 years.
Ottoman empire outlived Habsburg, German, and Russian empires.
@@sircatangry5864
I agree, the ottomans put on an impressive fight!
@@sircatangry5864
Ottoman empire outlived the Russian German and Habsburgs because ottomans were already failing and no one saw them as a strong empire .Allies were more focused on germany and Habsburgs.
firstly the ottoman empire wasn't a threat at all even tho they were holding multiple fronts .( not even holding they lost most of it )
The only impressive thing they did was manage to fight war despite their situation
The problem here was almost germany allied are really the worst in the history austria cant beat serbia alone
Germany casually beating Enemies with 2 times their Men Strenght
Kinda their strategy since Prussian times. Didn't always work out for some reason.
Those guys have always known how to do war. They just built different
*Germans and their allies
немцы всегда умели воевать и это не то что они сильны или мускулистые они дисциплинированные и это было самое главное как говорится немцы это римские легионеры второй мировой войны вспомните когда римская армия смогла победить с 80 тысяч против 250 -300 тысяч галлов вот так же и третий рейх против ссср успешно воевали хотя в итоге проиграли.
Yeah right Russia was fighting the Ottomans and had a civil war going on at the same time. "Germans" were more than half of Europe in both wars
Romania still existed as a country and managed to withstand some major offensives, in the end it played out well for them. tough decisions in tough times. but correct decisions. keep in mind that Romanian Monarchy in that time was of German origin, but still had the historical balls to decide to side with the allies.
Sim, e eles conseguiram muitos territórios depois da guerra.
You mean with his cousins in England, and Russia. All the Monarchs of this conflict were related closely.
@@sr.andreazzipraticamente duplicaram seu tamanho
@@pedrolucas2250 sim, é depois da segunda guerra, perderam a Moldávia e alguns territórios.
@@greyfox78569Ferdinand was part of Hohenzollern.
Respect to the creator for the hard work
The fact this guy's pc can handle this much flags is crazy
not really they are just 2d images moving around its not like its in 3d
HOI4 moment
You should have seen the Allied landings in the Balkans in one of my skating rinks.
They’re literally just images. How is that crazy
the units standing in russia are slowly moving, if you hadn't seen this mapsinanusthell
Someone: How much flags you want?
Him: Yes
The animations are so satisffying, I enjoyed watching it!!!
The battlefield 1 soundtrack tho 👌🏻
Finland just noping out of Russia
Because of revolution
Real
It's sad to see
@@whatischeese4179 no, it's not
@@creepquest It is, Finnish Reds began their own uprising after the revolution in Russia and the country was plunged into a civil war, it could have even turned communist if not for the German invasion which massively helped the local White forces. Russian Empire and Finland had a rough relationship in the last decades before the fall, some Finns even went to Germany to fight on their side in the war, but at least it was peaceful
East: 🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫
West: 💤💤💤💤💤
More people died on the western front front in World War II
@@haydenfox3251 nope
@@ahmedbabiker6562 I mean ww1
The german giant land grab at the end was what lost them the war. They could have had millions more soldiers on the west, by just settling with limited privileges to secure their supplies rather than actually controlling those lands that required so much occupation manpower
Thats not what lost them the war and relocating those soldiers (many of which they did, and more were on the way) wouldnt have changed the result because unfortunately britain was blockading germanys ports which starved the country and all the civilians and as a result the army. They had no choice but to surrender. What they shouldve done was relocate more experienced soldiers from the east to the west during their early successes against russia because they did more with less soldiers so they shouldve only kept enough there to make steady gains or keep the russians at bay. I agree they were a bit greedy though but you have to understand the era ww1 was in. Everyone was greedy. Land and territory mas very important. Germany was actually one of the least greedy states. They had to secure the lands in the east or else russia or the ussr could rearm gather their bearings and launch an counteroffensive much easier
They needed agricultural land they were starving by this point. Notice how aggressively they went for Ukraine, the breadbasket of Europe.
@@cmt6997 but they could have traded for bread by securing a favourable deal, instead of having to directly control the land themselves
@@982-o4e could have traded with who? Ukraine was in total chaos with a complete breakdown of central authority. The Germans knew if they Ukraine was left to its own devices it would be torn apart by anarchists, communists, monarchists, and social democrats. Which is exactly what happened when they withdrew.
@@cmt6997 i guess i underestimated the situation in the east then. it seems like the germans are destinated to lost the war no matter what they could have done
and that will cause the 2nd world war, they are deemed to lose everything no matter what they choose in a history after 1914. how sad
Everyone: Needing allies
Russia: what are allies?
finaly, someone uses the propper flag for austria during WW1
The Eastern Front had so frickin many troops
It had less deaths than the western front
How bro motivates me when I fail the Art exam:
very nicely animated
It's crazy to think that all those numbers going down are individual peoples lives
if you take this serious and think about it....
its madness...
example: all that people you know dead... and much more...
bruh... :(
Imagine being a German soldier in the Eastern Front only to see on the newspapers that the war is lost……….
Listening a radio, in the World War I?
In that case they could use their social media to know about how things were in the Western Front!
@@Adam_Petrescu there fixed it
@@ar-1571
Perfection.
Anyone know why the Germans/Austrians/Bulgarians never finished occupying Romania after it surrendered? I can see their soldiers disappear but the remaining land stays blue for the rest of the war.
After Russia began collapsing Romania had some agreements with the central powers to stop fighting.
ww1 wasn't really like ww2 in thar it was fighting to the bitter end everywhere with one big treaty. Some countries signed treaties that got them out of the war early
Romania surrendered
@@elementsounds7027whitepeaced*
romania surrendered and got back its land , but promised not to invade for the rest of the war
Thanks for the Battlefield 1 music
Can’t lie the Battlefield 1 music goes hard tho
The fact that serbia lasted that long against the austrians is actually very impressive! (Yes i do know the austrians was in a very bad situation at the time)
*Bulgaria joins the Central Powers*
🇷🇸: Oh uh…
*Romania joins the Allies Powers*
🇦🇹-🇭🇺 and 🇧🇬: Cry about it
Bulgarians, gretest backstabbers of all time
Romania : hmm serbia is defeated and russia made almost no progress and im surrounded by austro-hungarian and bulagarian borders... ill declare war!
If not, Bulgaria would backstabbed them anyway 😂
They were also Turkish troops with the frontline with Romania and russia
Were the ottoman empire really that important to place here?
@@austria-hungary7680 yes
@@vatancelik8230 in the entire war?
@@austria-hungary7680I mean like you can not just forget a massive country like the Ottoman Empire joined the war? And they did fight with the British in the Egypt and stuff…
But Ottomans lost at Caucasus and was pushed back, same at Egypt, at Iraq territory when British troops landed there for defend Persian oil, and other stuff, and when they was failed at Caucasus, they started kill armenians, that more than 1.300.000 people died from this genocide, So only thing what ottomans did is fighting vs some of British troops, so ottomans don't was such big trouble for Any country at this war, only for British, but not for so long.
I wish these types of videos had a number of total line troops throughout the fighting aswell as a number for the dead up to that point
Romania joined and got immediately folded like a omelette 55 times over
serbia was owning austrohungary until bulgaria backstabbed them lol
That is hardcore truth. Greatest backstabbers of all time.
Because of 2nd balkan war
@@azureablaze8721betrayed their Slavic brother over greed
and it's not like Bulgaria was previously attacked by every neighbor?
@@Jeff_Reyxexactly, 2nd Blacan war was started by Bulgarians attacking Serbia, it was their fault
They didn’t even let Romania finish talking💀
Czechoslovak Legion has left the chat
Germany: Iam the real speed.
Moskau: Guten Tag.
Russian empire getting into a civil war
Russian empire: LEMME TELL U SOMETHING LEMME TELL U SOMETHING AHHHHH
SOVIET UNION: sup
Россия внесла огромный вклад в первую мировую войну, оттянув на себя огромные силы врага. Но после окончания войны получила - ничего.
Спасибо Николашке и его корумпированной семейке которые довели страну до трёх революций
Karma za liczne kradzieże
@@Прион а доказательства коррумпированности будут?
@@ДенисОррлов Материала в интернете и свидетельств современников полно, сиди и изучай, а не занимайся защитой паразитов.
Получить что-то должны были большевики, которые отказалась выплачивать долги РИ и подписали сепаратный мир с центральными державами? Убийственная логика
Russia retreating from front lines
Romania: declares war on winning side...
Yaaay thank you so much for using the correct flag for Austria-Hungary!!!
Romania:AAAA ALLIES HELP IM GONNA DIE
France:dont worry i Will help you
That one Austrian Division in Russian Occupied territory: 🤫🧏
The German language always inspires the will to fight
調べれば調べるほどカッコよくて強い国、ドイツ帝国、調べれば調べるほど弱い国、ドイツ第三帝国。
WW1: Knocked out the Russians saved by the french
WW2: Knocked out the French saved by the Russians
Россия не была оккупирована, Россия была в состоянии продолжать войну, просто большевики решили заключить мир, так как войска были нужнее для гражданской войны
French saved Russians?
Russia was saved by the US in ww2
Re U really think so?@@johnnyb2909
I advise you to familiarize yourself with the Brusilov breakthrough (1916). This is one of the most important operations of Russia, thanks to which the French were able to win the Battle of Verdun. Now it can be hard to believe that we helped each other.
It’s so interesting hearing war cries from over 100 years ago
Romania: LETS GOOOOOO
The Central Powers: no
The fact that the Central Powers did what Napoleon and Hitler couldn't is insane
Они и не сделали. Большевики сделали. Большевики не центральные державы
@@СтариГенералъ the Bolsheviks were paid and financed by New York bankers and the Kaiser and thus the central powers....
Only 30 years after russia took berlin for the second time
Weiter so!
Soviet Union 83 years ago: protecting the homeland from invaders.
Now Russia: We are the invaders.
Why not?
Protecting homeland from invader my ass,they litterally invade Finland and Romania before WWII started
Yea these days they are invading to protect their people in eastern ukraine. I don't support either side of the war but ukraine fucked up big by not honouring the minsk agreement.
Надо было уничтожить сразу, чтобы не борзели сейчас
FINALLY SOMEONE RECOGNIZES WW1 AND NOT WW2 BUDDY YOUR THE BEST
Edit:god someone help him
Love how the plan went from "Destroy france, turn to russia and destroy russia" to the exact opposite lmao
Man I just realized this if Russia didn’t attack German empire and just built there economy and help with stopping the revolts usa and Russia will still be friends
O Apetite dos americanos é voraz, eles não tem amigos, a guerra atual não é para atacar a Rússia, os Liberais americanos estão afundando a Europa. A Alemanha lutar contra a Rússia é uma loucura que nunca favoreceu esses países e sim os Anglos.
@@rafael-flu5602The British managed to pit the Russians and Germans against each other. The Alliance of the Three Emperors, which posed an incredible threat to Britain, but protected the interests of both the Germans and the Russians, was to be preserved. Then the story would have gone completely differently...
@@victordegtyarev1006A guerra da Ucrânia hoje é a continuação da mesma política, causar rupturas entre russos e alemães, o financiamento de Hitler pelo ocidente também esperavam que Hitler atacaria apenas os Russos.
Uh, technically, Germany was the first to declare war on Russia in 1914.
The US and Russia would never be friends. The Empire was a murder machine uncaring for its own people and leading to the death of all of Russia. Even if it hadn't fallen however, the US and Russians would either have differing goals and would be enemies, or the Russians would be under the control of the US.
Amazing how much more troops Russia had and still lost the war. This really shows that numbers don't necessarily means that these troops are well equipped
The bro is confusing the words. "equipment" and "revolution" are completely different concepts. Russia did not violate international treaties and did not use gas + Russia fought on 3 fronts, and the Eastern Front was too long to defend it. If you knew at least something about the tactics of warfare, you would understand why in 1915 the Russian Imperial Army retreated and gained a foothold, holding the defense for 2 years. Your comment shows us the level of education in the USA xd
@@MisterEvrey Russia fought on 1 front only. The Ottoman front is in the mountains so it was hard to defend. The Russian military was completely and utterly devastated by the numerically inferior German and Astro-Hungarian forces.
@@napobg6842 1. Eastern front
2. Ottoman front (Russian victory)
3. Persian front (Russian victory)
😂
@@MisterEvrey Small and insignificant fronts. The Russians had no play in tthe defeat of the Ottoman Empire. It was entirely Allied victory. Russia lost the war and was humiliated
No, in 1922, the White Russian Army existed. This means that Russia won the First World War, because the White Army did not recognize the shameful Brest peace.
Ottomans also sent a corps to eastern front even fought in brusilov offensive(im turkish)
Bükreş'e Osmanlı ordusu girdi diye biliyorum
Welp, that true, but, you got failed at Caucasus and even pushed back.
Based as hell
@@USA_G0vernment then russia got clapped
@@W4emTP Because of Revolution, so.
Russia- Why are we turning red?
Lenin- Hi.
Russia in start : Nikolay II
Russia in end : Vladimir Lenin
As a Hungarian, hell yeah!
now lets see them 1 year later
@@lucavc29 well we won the eastern front
@@Boti-vr5hv germany*
@@Boti-vr5hvmeh
@@Boti-vr5hvThe vast majority of generals were German/Austrian
How are Russia always losing even when they always outnumber their enemies 😂
Во-первых: Россия практически всегда побежала в войнах, в которых участвовала.
Во-вторых: численное превосходство мало что даёт, если твоя армия более устаревшая и менее обученная, чем у врага.
@@seiro8606 В ПМВ с обоих сторон воевали по большей части мобики без какого-либо опыта войны, и, соответсвенно, приобритали они его тоже более-менее одновременно с обоих сторон. Гораздо большую роль сыграли вещи более банальные - количество и качество артиллерии и путей сообщения. Перед войной в немецком генштабе боялись, что если Российская Империя завершит (иронично) запланированное закончиться в 1917 году перевооружение, то её будет невозможно победить. Очевидно, что за такой короткий срок нельзя внезапно научиться хорошо воевать, зато что можно, так это наладить производство всех необходимых для современной войны вещей и накопить их приличный запас
Go study history, clown😂
Чел, Россия проиграла не Германии, она проиграла большевикам. Если бы не предатели в феврале и октябре 1917 года - Германии не видать победы над Россией как и высадки в Британии.
Это доказывает хотя бы то, что до революций при самых худших условиях - немцы не продвинулись дальше Польши.
@@СтариГенералътак даже до двух революций 1917 года Русская императорская армия гораздо чаще отступала, как в 1915, чем наступала, как во время Брусиловского прорыва летом 1916. И это при том, что имела подавляющее численное превосходство над немцами, вдобавок у немцев был ещё второй большой фронт на западе, а у России мелкий Кавказский фронт. И вдовесок немцы обеспечивали себя сами, а царь выезжал на западном лендлизе, впрочем как и Сталин во второй мировой войне. Без западной помощи и западного второго фронта ни цари, ни большевики не выдержали бы натиска немцев, невзирая на колоссальную разницу в численности населения и мобилизационного ресурса.
The Russians would have broken the Germans completely if Nicholas wasn’t betrayed.
Lol
U wish. russia needed french guns because they couldn't make enough despite their massive population
Bud,Russian can't defeat Germany alone.Germany was very industrialised while Russian is backwards state
no still
@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 people don't give people guns it's factories
And tons of ammo and guns were hold by the bolshviks
@@Gum167 they can tho germans themselves said that by 1917 they would lose to Russians
Romania: i'll help.
*a few months later*
Romania: i need help.
I love how you used the correct Russian Flag
Actually not correct. The flag he's using was never actually implemented as Russia's flag, it was only proposed. Russian Empire just used the standard whote-blue-red flag during WW1.
🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬❤❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏българия
Былгария🇷🇺🇧🇬
Была унижена Сербами и Великобританией в первой мировой , а во второй мировой советами .
Russia serves as an example of poor leadership and a weak army that can get defeated by a far smaller army
Как раз наоборот.
Россия смогла выстоять под ударами немцев в условиях снарядного голода. А после даже провести столь масштабное наступление, какого союзники до 1918 года сами смогли провести. Проиграла Россия только из-за предательства либералов-демократов и коммунистов, устроивших две революции во время войны.
germany, austria hungary, and the ottoman empire 3 armies
Ти абсолютно правий. У Росії завжди була біда з головою. Не забувай, Росія втратила в Першу світову більше всіх інших, воювавши на півтора року менше за інших. А цей недолугий москаль традиційно звинувачує у всьому демократів і більшовиків. Він не може додуматися своїми мізками, що в поразці Росії і в лютневій революції винний лише цар Микола перший, який в березні відрікся від престолу, що ввергло його імперію в хаос. Також цей москаль досі не знає, що так звана жовтнева революція була військовим переворотом лише в Петрограді. І, ти уявляєш, зараз Московська церква канонізувала того ідіота Миколу в святі православні! Отака тобі безголова Росія з темним народом.
@@СтариГенералъ The Romanovs sent millions to die without so much as a care. The traitors were the imperialists, the communists were the patriots. Romanov Russia could never have reached the wealth and power of the Soviets, and Oligarch Russia is a pathetic shadow of the USSR, where little girls became prostitutes and little boys became heroin dealers in the 1990s
It was a lot of factors that basically doomed the Russians from the start, a non-existent military industry, weak and unpopular government, some of the worst commanding officers in history frankly (with notable exceptions), and a horrible lack of infrastructure to properly supply a modern war. Russia was an 18th century country fighting a 19th century war and lost badly because of it
What about the Czechoslovak legionares?
during russian civil war
@@justacat2 Wrong,they fought even before the civil war
@@Chief... ok
@@Chief...Are you dumb lol? Civil war started in 1917
@@Chief... They wouldnt even show up in this short.
For those who don't get what happened:
In 2017 March there was a February Revolution in Russia, The Provisional Goverment defeated Emperor Nikolai II.
But The Provisional Goverment got upset. They failed their operation on the front in July, and In October, communists defeated Provisional Goverment and stopped the war on Eastern Front.
"2017"💀
@@nb94840 oh, damn
The Eastern Front if Russia hadn't run out of shells:📈📈📈📈
Still no food tho and no morale
Where is the ottomans?
Ottomans was send to so many army to romania border
They're not
@@hookplay7229No they sent a corps to eastern front even fought in brusilov offensive(im turkish)
@@CryptedDataa ok, but this doesnt change anything, one couple of troopers is too less
@@hookplay7229 Bruh i didnt say ottomans changed everything.
@@hookplay7229 you are a sad man
Why The Austro-Hungarian Empire Flag Is Austrian Empire Flag?💀
Because that was the actual flag
There is no Austro-Hungarian flag that’s why
Because the flag were combined Austria & Hungarian is not official, and they represent that because Austria is suffering Low stability to its people...
what HOI4 does to a mfer
Austria Hungary didnt have an official flag.
Russians in the comments trying to convince anyone that they didn't lose this terribly
the Germans themselves thought they were going to lose in 1916 and you are here talking shit
Ну так если вы откроете учебник истории, а не ограничитесь одним видео с картой на Ютубе, то поймёте, что это так. Немцы не нанесли поражения России. Армия России была уничтожена двумя революциями в феврале и октябре 1917. Сами же немцы не смогли прорвать фронта и ту же Польшу заняли во многом потому, что русские сами её оставили из-за снарядного голода 1915 года, стабилизируя и выравнивая фронт.
@@СтариГенералъреволюции 1917 года не на ровном месте возникли, а являлись прямым следствием недовольства населения происходящим. А население было возмущено вследствии бесконечной мобилизации на бессмысленную войну хер пойми куда ради амбиций поехавшего царька. Вот даже по видео заметно, что русские постоянно превосходят немцев в 1.5-2 раза, почему же они чаще отступали, чем наступали? Хотя Россия воевала на 2 фронта (один большой Восточный и один маленький Кавказский), а немцы воевали на 2 больших фронта (восточный и западный) и кучу маленьких в африке и Азии. И даже при таких обстоятельствах Россия не могла продвинуться вперёд. Даже после псведоудачного брусиловского прорыва немцы через пару месяцев отбили территории. И как население России должно было на все это реагировать? Так что российское военно-политическое руководство само виновато в революции.
@@diamondvankiessling8869 Октябрьская революция стала следствием бардака, учинённого Временным Правительством. Временное Правительство же выехало во многом за счёт удачи, ибо февральская революция по большей части делалась только в Петербурге, не поддержанная остальной частью России. Революционерам повезло, что царь был на фронте, революционерам повезло, что царь поверил в их угрозы про "арестованную семью", революционерам повезло, что толком в Петрограде не было сил, способных быстро навести порядок и так далее. Февральская революция как раз-таки не была столь основополагающая в своих причинах.
@@СтариГенералъ аналогичный ответ, никаких революций бы не случилось, если бы война складывалась иначе. Нужно было либо быстро громить немцев и продвигаться вглубь, учитывая, что численное превосходство позволяло, либо вообще не воевать и заключить какой-нибудь мирный договор и заниматься своей страной, ибо там проблем было выше крыши. А так вырыли немцам и австро-венграм яму, и сами в неё первыми попали. Первыми, потому что немцы в конечном итоге тоже истощились, как и задумывалось, но на полтора года позже (в ноябре 1918), но для России уже было поздно.
"Lets spam! What will go wrong?"
Revolution?
BF 1 soundtrack went as hard as the war
Войска России великии герои, чьи жертв были забыты
full version needed
The full vid is on the channel
At first i thought it was a navel invasion of South America
same
Russia: loses
Entente: hurray, we finally won!
As they say "quality over quantity"
если бы не гражданская война
Даже если бы не Гражданская война мы бы всё равно проиграли, особенно с Николаем II , но для нас это всё равно гражданская война оказалась лучшим исходом
@@ЧингизКильмухаметов😂😂😂
@@ЧингизКильмухаметовВойна позиционной стала а потом и Штаты вступили. Не проиграли бы
You lost two armies at Tannenberg. I promise it wasn't the civil war. Y'all were ass before that. 😂😂😂
@@ЧингизКильмухаметовгениально. Германия проиграла Антанте БЕЗ России. Схера ли бы тогда Германия победила Антанту С Россией?
Но потом РСФСР и СССР смогли вернуть территории и потом даже ещё больше
После капитуляции Германии
Какой ценой? Если бы не предательская октябрьская революция, то Россия бы вышла победителем в 1 мировой войне и возможно не появилась бы Германия под руководством фюрера.
@@Чел-й7е да то понятно,но откуда они могли знать что Германия проиграет и тем более военные России уже были сильно уставшими
@@Slavic_union Оттуда, что Германия вела войну на 2 фронта под морской блокадой, а все два её союзника терпели поражение за поражением. К тому же 6 апреля 1917 в войну вступили США, 18 мая в них началась мобилизация в армию 1 миллиона человек. Всё, что нужно было для неминуемой победы это продержаться в войне до следующей весны, когда новоприбывшие американские дивизии сломают многолетний паритет западного фронта и позволят союзникам нанести решающий удар (что не произошло в реальной жизни, потому что весной 1918 Германия, осовободившая собственные дивизии с восточного фронта, вела уже своё наступление, которое американцам ещё сначала пришлось останавливать). Никаких военных причин почему этого сделать было нельзя не существовало, обороняться в ПМВ было несравнимо легче, чем наступать, траншеи давно уже были вырыты, не было и намёка на немецкое наступление, которое если бы и произошло тут же было бы использованно союзниками чтобы ударить на западе, с которого нобходимо было снять дивизии для прорыва на востоке. Коммунисты вышли из войны исключительно по политичсеким причинам - они пришли ко власти на штыках трусов и дезертиров, которые были готовы махать любой красной тряпкой, лишь бы им пообещали, что их не отправят на фронт. Потом, конечно, это обещание было нарушено - большевики закрепившись у власти назад всех мобилизовали для гражданки, только вот к тому моменту у них уже не было ни штыков ни ружей чтобы считаться с их мнением, а для дезертиров и трусов вернули расстрелы
@@desran4447 армия Российской империи устали и они недоедали и другие были ужасы и коммунисты были против этого из-за чего они вышли из войны
Only Russia could get bullied so hard back to back world wars and still win both of them
Bro they got humiliated by Germany in both world wars
@@TesticleTortureGaming I do not remember the German troops in St. Petersburg (Leningrad) or in Moscow. But I do know for sure that Russian troops were in Berlin twice. So you should double-check your knowledge of history.
@@LeantenantRussians got owned in the Great War and i do not remember russia being in Berlin twice. Perhaps once, but not twice.
@@guard6069 You need to learn some history then
@@Leantenant okay, please educate me then. What was the second time the Russians took Berlin? At least we can agree that Germany owned Russia in the first world war, right? Even though they didn't capture Petrograd or Moscow, they still won the first.
Pls I'm your huge subscriber and I know so much aboute history pls how to do that in flipa clip!? 🙁
Сейчас для нас это всего лишь ролик и цифры, но каждый из них сражался за Родину, я горжусь моими предками 🇷🇺
World war 1: Germany started
World war 2: Germany started
World war 3: Germany starts
ww1 was started by Austria so shut up
ww1 started by the rus that backed up the slavs of serbia knowing that it would cause a german backup for austria
ww2 started by the rus that had major interest to take a huge chunk of poland and make entire europe bolshevik (they fought wars within 1919, 1920 etc while ww1 was already over
ww3 started by the rus that attacked ukraine?
Tell me what you want the rus expansion plans were always a major part of the wars without them it wouldnt have been world wars and the first one would have been won by the germans.
history books only show the war declarations not the cause of the declarations and alliance system.
@@Darki868 Сіз қателесесіз. You are wrong
@@Darki868 Germany is now trying to start World War 3
@@Тимка-7777In which World Germany started ww1???
Russia never won a war alone at his history
Are you from Ukraine?
Русско турецкие войны:🗿
Ты уверен ?Русско Турецкие войны , Наполеоновские войны , Войны со Швецией, Вторая мировая (Союзники помогли только в конце нахрен такую помощь)
@@RussianEmpire-133войну с Наполеоном 1812 года целиком и полностью оплатила Британия, используя крепостных России как пушечное мясо и торпеду на французов, а во второй мировой войне лендлиз официально был задокументирован 1 октября 1941, на 4-й месяц войны, и британские танки уже отражали атаку Вермахта под Москвой. Потом поставки западного оружия только возрастали уже в 1942-1943.
@@diamondvankiessling8869 ну так факт в том , что те самые крепостные и выиграли Наполеона . Что именно оплатила Британия?Британцы трусливо сидели на своих островах в блокаде , в то время как русские шли вперёд , а уже когда мы подходили к Парижу она решила "присоединиться". За 3 месяца Вермахт уже оккупировал до хрена территорий Совка пока "Союзники" не решались на чью сторону встать , но когда увидели , что мы выиграли битву за Москву , то поняли весь потенциал и решили вместе Вермахта качать Совок .
It always amazes me how russians struggle against armies much smaller than them.
in the Second World War, not only Russians fought on the side of the Soviet Union, but also many other nations
"Gay this fuck" "gay this labor" such inspirational words