ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

Mark Shepard, New Forest Farm and Forest Agriculture Enterprises

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 พ.ค. 2013
  • Shepard's latest book, Restoration Agriculture has a trade mark management technique, STUN, Sheer, Total, Utter, Neglect.
    Filmed by Greg David

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @BradKaellner
    @BradKaellner ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I could listen to this guy talk for hours, and I have

  • @DoDasDew
    @DoDasDew 11 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I also really respect the fact that he is out there actively putting permaculture theories into practice; instead of charging inflated prices for courses and writing books on the subject.
    No offense to anyone but I feel the term Permaculture is often bastardized by some folks. I think this guy, however, is the real deal and we need more people doing exactly what he is doing- GOING FOR IT.

  • @madmikey1980
    @madmikey1980 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    “ The whole doom and gloom industry might go broke” love it. Thank you for this amazing video

  • @mkbnett
    @mkbnett 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yep, and Mark says he's taught a number of sections of permaculture courses, too. If you're interested in broadacre permaculture, he's probably the best teacher in North America because he explains everything from his experience doing commercial permaculture in this place - a very unique and valuable perspective!

  • @MrsMika
    @MrsMika 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Masanobu Fukuoka has shown how to grow wheat, rice and barley without tilling the ground and while building up the soil. In the 1970s he wrote a book about it called the "The One-Straw Revolution". It can be done just need to get more people to apply it.

  • @coven5803
    @coven5803 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Mark! Awesome!!

  • @DoDasDew
    @DoDasDew 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing!!
    I admire the final ~1 minute (conclusions he makes)
    "Let's not tell everybody it's easy; the whole doom and gloom fear industry might go broke." hahahahah
    This guy is awesome and sees it all in very simple terms and sums up solutions adequately and fluently.

  • @OZZYSCRACKMEUP
    @OZZYSCRACKMEUP 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i never met him and i never knew him on a personal level but man i really miss steve irwin. so full of life and would generally make you happy just watching him.

  • @erinirish9975
    @erinirish9975 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NICE! Wish I could visit or work there.

    • @BubblewrapHighway
      @BubblewrapHighway 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too! Maybe one day I'll have my own garden paradise.

  • @hhwippedcream
    @hhwippedcream 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Mark. Id lke to reforest and graze rhe Diablos here in CA but land is prohibitively expensive.

  • @BubblewrapHighway
    @BubblewrapHighway 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do Mark Shepard and Paul Stamets know about each other? Because they should.

  • @zega74
    @zega74 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, well worth watching, like permaculture on "steroids"...

  • @ladyeclectic
    @ladyeclectic 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Would have actually liked to see the swale lesson at 17:06...

  • @dr88ought
    @dr88ought 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    since the present farming methods are Sheer Total Utter Poisoning It to Death (STUPID) I think some remediation is a good thing before planting a "zillion" plants and getting into the STUN phase of the journey. things like mineral remediation, seeing where the fertility of that section is versus where you would want it to enter the STUN phase. as Mark says the biological systems take freaking long and it is reasonable to invest a few years at the start (and maybe more than a few) in order to bring the soil up to snuff. :3

    • @CharlieDurrant
      @CharlieDurrant 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +towardthelight:) This is 23 mins long. In a longer video he explains how he uses salt blocks for cattle to get lost minerals in the soil.

    • @CharlieDurrant
      @CharlieDurrant 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Charlie Durrant Also Key line and subsoil plowing involves 'remediation'

    • @dr88ought
      @dr88ought 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Charlie Durrant
      Hi Charlie, the nutritional delivery to humans by animals is a negative. and the environ impact is really really negative. I agree on using what is available to remediate the soil but not animals. :)

    • @cherylweso
      @cherylweso 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +towardthelight:) If you don't use animals to break down the biomass, what will? Our local metropark thought the same thing and ended up with a huge thatch layer and they ended up cutting and baling it(in a savanna setting), how green is that? How do you provide fertility for the soil, by making compost for tens of thousands of acres, show me who is doing it on that scale, please?

    • @dr88ought
      @dr88ought 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Cheryl, I am interested in staying away from the present domestication co-dependence situation. Things do rot. But I am not against natural systems. :3

  • @AcidProblemChild
    @AcidProblemChild 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does anyone have a scientific paper on that last number he threw out there? "A 2% increase in soil organic matter stores 100 times more water. You can go through a drought."

  • @katsheetz
    @katsheetz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    WHY is not CRP offering this as an option?

  • @Christian-bc2es
    @Christian-bc2es 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The hard part is getting the land.

    • @dali1384
      @dali1384 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Depends on your strategy. There are old people who are looking for successors to take care of their land, because their children don't want to or they don't have any.
      There are places that nobody wants - maybe because of contamination of the soil or poor soil. These are cheaper but will take more time to rebalance the soil or you might be forced to use raised beds.

    • @kenbellchambers4577
      @kenbellchambers4577 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dali1384 If you look around, you can often get land for paying old tax bills. In some places, you don't need to even do that.

  • @justanotherhomestead3710
    @justanotherhomestead3710 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    21:47 You math is off. If 1% increase in organic matter results in 10% increase in water retention, a 2% increase in organic matter will result in 21% increase in water retention, NOT 100% increase.

  • @gregrodgers8705
    @gregrodgers8705 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    mark could you add KELP FARMING to your enterprises and ORGANIC VALLEY distribution? BREN SMITH of 3D OCEAN FARMING and GARY FREITAG of ALASKA SEA GRANT are your counterparts on the kelp side. yahooie!

  • @katsheetz
    @katsheetz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    smallest acreage is this doable

  • @wvhaugen
    @wvhaugen 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A farmer/gardener can do all this without taking a permaculture design course.

  • @simclardy1
    @simclardy1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ 21:56 you state that 1% increase in bio mass gives a 10% increase in water retention. Then you say a 2% increase in biomass gives 10%x10%=100% increase in water retention.........? The two should be added not multiplied. (2% increase gives 20% water retention). Still a great thing. Thanks for the video. I am enjoying your book and I appreciate someone that practices what they preach!

    • @webguyz1
      @webguyz1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Such a simple fact makes me wonder about his credentials...or maybe I am the idiot:

  • @Bytesmiths
    @Bytesmiths 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sure, but a well-done PDC covers this and much more. Mark isn't doing anything that *isn't* part of Permaculture.

  • @dickhead8775
    @dickhead8775 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    All vague hype, no hard figures. What about yields?

    • @sherburnecody
      @sherburnecody 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well in 2015 him and his associates in the organic valley cleared a billion dollars

    • @dickhead8775
      @dickhead8775 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sherburnecody Can you please provide a link?

    • @sherburnecody
      @sherburnecody 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wanna say one of his 2016 conference speech. Possibly in a black polo

    • @bryonlako7377
      @bryonlako7377 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Read his book, he goes deep into yield numbers and nutrition per acre vs corn

  • @TheGrasspond
    @TheGrasspond 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    He is completely wrong during his little rant of current expenses vs investment. Determining change in annual cash flow caused by a capital investment is exactly how to measure the decision. In finance its called capital budgeting. This guy has a self righteous attitude and he talks down to people. He doesn't know shit about finance and it makes me wonder if he knows as much as he thinks he does about everything else. Just say'in

  • @abdallaeid4067
    @abdallaeid4067 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    illuminati