YT needs the "view comments vice versa - the last, "worst" ones view first" button, maybe it could be really interesting, then, instead of usual "view the biggest BS first" ... luckily here is "just a few comments" so i can do it myself, actually ... i am used to notepad, anyway ... instead of slow, lagging, embarrassing word and its unchangeable default settings dictature ... YT is very similar to notepad ... but notepad works much better, of course ... because they arent other people ... calling their nazi ego "rules", oppressing normal people with their unlimited, unpunished, obviously "legal" crimes, which means that YT itself is a big crime ...
in some ways this movie is very sad mostly in the acting, often the script, and it only becomes worse, realizing that just 6 years after this film, Star Trek would premiere on television, with arguably much more realistic writing, albeit with a tiny budget for effects. Even so, we can find aspects of this film, both in the concepts and in the visual effects that would be used again and again, in fact notice the stars during the end credits? How they actually appear to be set on two large pillars that are spinning on either side of the screen... that same idea would be used later in Star Trek movie film credits. Why exactly i am not certain, but i do note it. The chess-playing robot that gets a heart installed? Classic Sci-fi trope! One of the things i truly did enjoy was Intervision, the world broadcast network, which seems to mimic the BBC.
The robot closely resembles the ones sent to Mars. Ever notice how so many things in these old sci-fi movies were so very accurate to what is reality today???
Pronouncements, mine boy. Science fiction isn't fiction. Pronouncements of what's to come plotted out by the planners hundreds of years ahead of time including world wars, League of Nations, UN, CFR, central banking, one world government (the true goal). Satanists, in otherwords. We live in their scripted reality. Didn't used to be that way. It's why Jesus Christ is so utterly important to understanding individual freedom against the planners who are occultists and Satanists.
Visually, this is a pretty amazing and imaginative film. I'd recommend NOT watching this version, which is the poorly-dubbed, poorly transferred, edited US release, ---which is missing the original sound and music: the music track on this release is stock music from old SF films. Aside from all that, this posting has had the sides of the picture cropped off. Watching this beautifully-designed film in its original color, widescreen format, with original music etc. is an entirely different experience, from an audio and visual perspective. (AMENDED NOTE: On second thought: It might be good to watch this version, and then try to see the original version---it has shown up on YT from time to time---to see how different the quality of a film can be in so many ways---Although I suspect only people interested in film/film history beyond a way to spend 90-ish minutes will find it worthwhile to pursue.)
Another Soviet film "Restyled " for an American audience. Hilarious how the blond press lady at 12:53 seems to have a Clark Gable moustache going on. Probably very attractive to a Soviet Audience.🤔
maybe they were LGBT-friendly long time before you (seems more attractive than your comment to anyone, btw) ... if the USSA ever were freindly in any way ... i was surprised that the USSA used to be international years ago, so i thought they became BS just lately, but i just mistakenly thought it was an USS movie ... the grumpy professor annoys me a lot ... maybe he reminds me on Biden and such self-proclaimed "all-knowing" dictators ...
I am watching on 2/4/2023 to watch the knuckleheads from the WH control the China balloon 😊 now the Biteone’s can be paid 20 million dollars to allow the balloon to send critical data back to the communist red Chinese 😊 yep I see the balloon 💭 😂
he isnt claiming it is crap because it is old ... you are claiming that ... i guess BS is BS not depending on (its) era ... i guess (even older) Buster Keaton's movies will be good maybe forever, unlike this movie, i guess ...
Who else reads the comments FIRST to see what the REAL experts and critics say before watching ???
I DO……I DO 😊
YT needs the "view comments vice versa - the last, "worst" ones view first" button, maybe it could be really interesting, then, instead of usual "view the biggest BS first" ... luckily here is "just a few comments" so i can do it myself, actually ... i am used to notepad, anyway ... instead of slow, lagging, embarrassing word and its unchangeable default settings dictature ... YT is very similar to notepad ... but notepad works much better, of course ... because they arent other people ... calling their nazi ego "rules", oppressing normal people with their unlimited, unpunished, obviously "legal" crimes, which means that YT itself is a big crime ...
Thank you for this movie!
Did the mathematician guy steal that hat from the local A&W root beer stand?
At least I know now Neil wasn't the first and we were on venus before the moon
Great movie👍👍👍
in some ways this movie is very sad
mostly in the acting, often the script,
and it only becomes worse, realizing that just 6 years after this film,
Star Trek would premiere on television, with arguably much more realistic writing,
albeit with a tiny budget for effects.
Even so, we can find aspects of this film, both in the concepts and in the visual effects
that would be used again and again, in fact notice the stars during the end credits?
How they actually appear to be set on two large pillars that are spinning on either side of the screen...
that same idea would be used later in Star Trek movie film credits. Why exactly i am not certain, but i do note it.
The chess-playing robot that gets a heart installed? Classic Sci-fi trope!
One of the things i truly did enjoy was Intervision, the world broadcast network, which seems to mimic the BBC.
Hard to believe we've had so much trouble in space!
They do look like TellyTubbies! 😱
That's Ernest Borgnine!
The robot closely resembles the ones sent to Mars. Ever notice how so many things in these old sci-fi movies were so very accurate to what is reality today???
Pronouncements, mine boy. Science fiction isn't fiction. Pronouncements of what's to come plotted out by the planners hundreds of years ahead of time including world wars, League of Nations, UN, CFR, central banking, one world government (the true goal). Satanists, in otherwords. We live in their scripted reality. Didn't used to be that way. It's why Jesus Christ is so utterly important to understanding individual freedom against the planners who are occultists and Satanists.
@@billkarmetsky4003 WOW thats heavy man!
Oh, they mentioned the Tonguska meteor impact. Cool.
It seems to have been an East German production originally.
Space shots were more simple then. Walk out to your rocket and 30 minutes later you're lifting off.
Well...that was dumb. Interesting to see what they thought robots would be like.
Interesting film, an artistic snapshot of late fifties & pre-Gagarin thinking . . . from the Eastern Block's grey walls.
Do you suppose the actor playing the black astronaut would know that white oppressors would turn him into an ink blot in this movie?
Yeah, the DP makes it really obvious that he's NEVER lit anybody with dark skin before!
I read the distributors chopped 30 minutes out of this East German film. Was it a travesty or kindness? We'll never know. We'll never know.
THANKS
Well that was fun. But I'm not going there for my holls.
Visually, this is a pretty amazing and imaginative film. I'd recommend NOT watching this version, which is the poorly-dubbed, poorly transferred, edited US release, ---which is missing the original sound and music: the music track on this release is stock music from old SF films. Aside from all that, this posting has had the sides of the picture cropped off. Watching this beautifully-designed film in its original color, widescreen format, with original music etc. is an entirely different experience, from an audio and visual perspective. (AMENDED NOTE: On second thought: It might be good to watch this version, and then try to see the original version---it has shown up on YT from time to time---to see how different the quality of a film can be in so many ways---Although I suspect only people interested in film/film history beyond a way to spend 90-ish minutes will find it worthwhile to pursue.)
And you are
@The Arbiter Check out our upcoming sci-fi series with Robert Picardo (Star Trek: Voyager): th-cam.com/video/1f5UfgPlMAA/w-d-xo.html
What's the original version called? Is it PLANET OF STORMS?
@@drdarkeny no, that was Voyage to the Prehistoric Planet
@@jandasalovich6469 - Yes, after reading this I went looking, and saw the film's an East German/Polish co-production called THE SILENT STAR.
1.18 Now I know who they remind me of...
The Teletubbies!
The look of the movie and the actors certainly look Soviet to me.
2:02 It's Bernie Sanders!
It is! That's hilarious....
Nailed it
yes, you are like his mirror ...
Far out, man,,,,,,,
Prime the rockets? With what?
With gollygeewhiz of course.
Another Soviet film "Restyled " for an American audience.
Hilarious how the blond press lady at 12:53 seems to have a Clark Gable moustache going on.
Probably very attractive to a Soviet Audience.🤔
maybe they were LGBT-friendly long time before you (seems more attractive than your comment to anyone, btw) ... if the USSA ever were freindly in any way ... i was surprised that the USSA used to be international years ago, so i thought they became BS just lately, but i just mistakenly thought it was an USS movie ...
the grumpy professor annoys me a lot ... maybe he reminds me on Biden and such self-proclaimed "all-knowing" dictators ...
This must have been the most non-racial film made at this time when most people said Star Trek was a pioneer of it's time.
30:20
jub
I am watching on 2/4/2023 to watch the knuckleheads from the WH control the China balloon 😊 now the Biteone’s can be paid 20 million dollars to allow the balloon to send critical data back to the communist red Chinese 😊 yep I see the balloon 💭 😂
Sooo f rated.
That was so funny?
Pretty load of crap
lovely historic understanding. Lets see what they say about Star Wars in fifty years time.
he isnt claiming it is crap because it is old ... you are claiming that ... i guess BS is BS not depending on (its) era ... i guess (even older) Buster Keaton's movies will be good maybe forever, unlike this movie, i guess ...