Is Crude Oil the Best Inflation Hedge? And Other Oil Questions (w/Michael Kao)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @steffverdonck4420
    @steffverdonck4420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Much appreciated for the high quality information. I have learned a lot and will watch this again in a couple of weeks to improve retention.

  • @tutorjonas4149
    @tutorjonas4149 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Some buzzword meanings discussed:
    Esg = environmental and social governance
    E&P = exploration and production companies
    Risk Assets = companies that are highly levered, or that have a lot price volatility
    Opex commodities = energy and consumer driven metal (ex aluminum) commodities that are being consumed.
    Capex commodities = cement, steel etc driven by capital expenditures, stuff that goes into buildings and infrastructure
    Hyper beta risk assets are firms with cashflows that are really really far out like concept tech stocks, that are most dependent on 0 or negative risk free rates.

  • @michaeldooley5845
    @michaeldooley5845 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks , exellent interview

  • @ksrexplore9242
    @ksrexplore9242 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very Informative & well explained! Thx Michael

  • @Xs0
    @Xs0 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been expecting 80 $usoil since April, myself..
    It’s getting choppy this month because it’s been so slow to advance higher, crowding of bulls etc. but it’s definitely the current trade to keep an eye on versus spy and dow. Nasdaq is also looking like 15k
    Not financial advice just my lil opinion.
    Good talk/interview. It’s very easy listening to him talk & learn a few things along the way

    • @Xs0
      @Xs0 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Price comes before news, so while I’m long typically things like oil plant explosions & war provocations seem to coincide with my trades 😎

    • @augustuscaesar5291
      @augustuscaesar5291 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Take a look at Yangarra Resources on YGRAF.

  • @marxenbrothers
    @marxenbrothers 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent interview! Thank you

  • @jessica11381
    @jessica11381 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This guy was great

  • @fmalexander5555
    @fmalexander5555 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can Real Vision summon the courage to interview the "King of Crypto" Richard Heart - I hope so! 🥇😂👍

  • @augustuscaesar5291
    @augustuscaesar5291 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yangarra resources YGRAF on the otc. Low debt, light oil assets

    • @ronsmith5601
      @ronsmith5601 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha… and I thought that’s my personal little Canadian secret.

  • @CmdrCorn
    @CmdrCorn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oil has been a pretty decent contrarian trade for awhile, and I think after a little correction or consolidation from here it will fly under the radar again along with most of the other commodities and energy for a nice long bull cycle rotation

    • @augustuscaesar5291
      @augustuscaesar5291 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Take a look at YGRAF yangarra resources on the otc, a low debt light oil stock

  • @Afsaroseli
    @Afsaroseli 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Apparently it was. well done

  • @AdamKays
    @AdamKays 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Asian Dave Bautista in the thumbnail.

  • @eagleabram4016
    @eagleabram4016 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plants need carbon monoxide from oil to produce fresh air for animals and human. Balancing the equation is a must. The problem is the forests have been destroyed, at the same, carbon monoxide has been increasing by human and nature (forest fires).

    • @CmdrCorn
      @CmdrCorn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      World forests, vegetation, and carbon sinks are the highest theyve been in something like a couple hundred years

    • @michaels4255
      @michaels4255 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Carbon dioxide CO2, not carbon monoxide CO. Very different in their effects!

    • @michaels4255
      @michaels4255 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CmdrCorn They are high in large part because there is lots of CO2 in the air, which increases vegetative production, both domestic and wild. more CO2=greener world.

    • @ronsmith5601
      @ronsmith5601 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaels4255 🤣

  • @listenup801
    @listenup801 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    NO!

  • @1966human
    @1966human 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No need for oil, unnecessary

    • @paradise6606
      @paradise6606 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Are you high. We need oil more now then ever.

    • @CmdrCorn
      @CmdrCorn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oil is probably single handedly responsible for a quarter of the worlds population today. If you got rid of it tomorrow, probably all those people would have to go too....
      Thats not how it works though. We never use less energy, even as we find more dense sources... Though I agree Oil will slowly become a lower and lower percentage of world energy for the foreseeable future

    • @michaels4255
      @michaels4255 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CmdrCorn Even if we could convert every passenger ICE vehicle in the world to a pure EV (a difficult and lengthy undertaking, if it is even possible), that would cut out only 26% of world oil consumption. When the oil has gone, so will have life as we have known it.

  • @timlund747
    @timlund747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No it's bad for the environment no to oil.