ความคิดเห็น •

  • @3dknowledge
    @3dknowledge 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NEW CHANNEL FOR ALL FUTURE VIDEOS! PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE EDUCATIONAL ENGINEERING VIDEOS!
    th-cam.com/channels/osExgfjj-DhMJXnQd2Y4gA.html

  • @sanguinj
    @sanguinj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excelente illustrations. I wish these method of explaining a process can replace the diagrams we see in the books or at least to add them. Thank you for sharing.

  • @tinkumajumdar8513
    @tinkumajumdar8513 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey man great explanation....

  • @wohoi
    @wohoi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    what software did you use here sir? I need something similar for my power plant design. thank you.

  • @zandracorpuz2162
    @zandracorpuz2162 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

    • @3dknowledge
      @3dknowledge 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Make sure to check the new channel on TH-cam, search for saVRee.

  • @albertlustado8574
    @albertlustado8574 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the different between the the dry, binary and double falsh geothermal power plant

  • @noaperez
    @noaperez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the great video..
    Could you explain why we need to cool up the condensed steam before injecting it back to the ground?

    • @micky6045
      @micky6045 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      we took hot fluid from the ground and not steam. We needed the steam to run the turbines. After the steam has served it purpose, it eventually turns into a "not that hot fluid again",. Its energy has been transferred to the turbines and it turns to fluid in that process.
      we deliberately condense it to increase the conversion process, which is finally injected back to the ground to be made hotter again.
      Hope this helps

    • @sanguinj
      @sanguinj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      However, is it bad if the fluid is injected back to the ground with a higher temperature ? Why does it need to be cool enough ? Thank you for answering.

  • @hridaimallick8088
    @hridaimallick8088 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought it was different from the flash steam geothermal powerplant but it tuned out the same.

  • @schimu90
    @schimu90 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is that what we could use to cool down YellowStone magma chamber so it doesn't explode?

    • @3dknowledge
      @3dknowledge 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Honestly, I have not idea, but I imagine the shear volume of magma down there would make it near impossible to cool? Actually, I just checked....
      www.bbc.com/future/story/20170817-nasas-ambitious-plan-to-save-earth-from-a-supervolcano
      "Cooling Yellowstone in this manner would happen at a rate of one metre a year, taking of the order of tens of thousands of years until just cold rock was left."
      So, by then people will probably still be watching my videos, but we might all be gone! :)
      Sounds like a definite plan though, cheap electricity for a thousand years and reduces the threat of extinction. Everyone wins.

    • @schimu90
      @schimu90 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes! That was the same article i read. And it doesn't need to cool down the magma chamber, just take enough heat so the temperature stops rising. That would be enough to stop the a catastrophic explosion.

  • @confettiballsurprise5372
    @confettiballsurprise5372 ปีที่แล้ว

    i know you

  • @questionreality6003
    @questionreality6003 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This will REPLACE coal, gas, oil steam-making power plants as the ONLY LEGAL power plant in the world.(We need the same amount of electricity as before 'x 2' - to then power the only LEGAL car in the future, the EV or lithium battery electric vehicle (me love the Tes 3!, can't wait to get one !! LEAVE IT IN THE GROUND; FOSSIL FUELS MUST BE MADE ILLEGAL TO BURN.