@@silvioantonio6952 HX AI MAX. If it seems like a serious competitor for the current mid-range dedicated GPUs, it's crazy, the 8700g is not bad but it competes with mid-range GPUs from many years ago.
@@silvioantonio6952 i used to have a 1650 and every time vram exceed 4gb it just crash or became stuttery I only had 2666 ddr4 at the time can't ask much about it These apu on other hand can be set to 16gb and eat even more without losing performance i believe
This mini PC plays Cyberpunk better than my 2016 build did. Simply amazing how far we've come. If only FSR 3.1 was available in all games. Think what we will have by 2030. This is amazing.
AMD will be unveiling a monster 16-core and 40CU APU in January next year, leaks say the iGPU's performance is around a desktop 4060Ti. It's going to be expensive no doubt, but I can totally see that APU in a mini PC like this performing similarly to a 12900K and RTX 4060Ti. Edit: it's the 4060Ti, not 4060.
@@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty 2060 isn't really a high bar to clear these days, in fact the 890M in this video can actually get pretty close with faster memory like LPDDR5X 8533Mhz. The Beelink model is massively bandwidth starved, which is why lowering resolution/using FSR doesn't net a substantial uplift in framerates.
@@hasnihossainsami8375 That's just not true at all. The 2060 IS a high bar to clear. Most gamers don't have RTX cards. Most gamers GPUs are weaker than the 2060. The 890M is damn impressive but let's not pretend like the 2060 isn't hard to beat. It is.
@@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty apologies for my vague wording, I meant to say that the 2060 isn't a high bar to clear for modern iGPUs. Like I said, the 890M can get close with faster memory, and the upcoming monster APU will be so much faster that it'll probably run circles around the 2060, though maybe not in RT applications - AMD's flavor of RT is weak. The biggest hurdle with iGPUs is memory bandwidth, and the monster APU solves this by having a 256-bit interface, which is only available with LPDDR5X. Pair that with the upcoming LPDDR5X 10700MHz and you've got ~356GB/s bandwidth, which is way more than the 4060Ti's 288GB/s. Even if they pair it with the slower but cheaper and readily available 8533MHz you're getting 272GB/s which is still pretty close.
It has fast ram, 7500Mhz soldered memory with 32 gb capacity and most of the time iGPU gets at least 8gb so you are not getting ram much faster than this unless you go quad channel.
That RAM bandwidth is a huge bottleneck here, the GTX 1650 mobile that I had is a much slower GPU that had higher memory bandwidth than the 890M and the bandwidth was still holding back its stock performance 💀
The Mac Mini is half the price and I'd probably say they'd get very similar performance. The M4 Pro ($1300, so it's not entirely fair) absolutely TROUNCES the 890M. Baldurs gate 3 performs the same at 1440p on the M4 Pro compared to the 890M at1080p. Tough to get comparable games though.
@@zagohcap Half the price is the 16gb-250gb ssd version (un-usable for gaming). If you wanna match the 32gb-1tr it's more expensive and then it probably makes more sense to get the Pro. Plus the choice of properly optimised games for MacOS is very limited so most of the time they will run worse than the SR9.
I expected more! Compared to my GMKtec K6, the increase is minimal, and the price is half as much. Apparently, performance improvements in a small form factor should not be expected until the release of DDR6 memory. Thanks for the video!
The actual CPU chip itself makes it that expensive. AMD can sell it because it is undoubtedly faster than Core Ultra 9 185H, which Intel themselves already priced really high for 45 W TDP mobile CPU.
This APU is a clear proof that "powerful budget APU" isn't a real thing and is not possible. The only powerful APUs are either sold in bulk over a contract to console makers like SONY/MS or they are from Apple who sell an "end product" and sell other services to recoup the cost.
Not only do you make excellent benchmark videos you also provide entertainment for my cat since he just jumped up as I was watching the video and started trying to catch your mouse pointer lol
@@leexy3395 It can literally fit in your pocket yet plays RDR2 better than XB1X which is just CRAZY!!! Tons of performance out of a tiny little thing compared to the top end desktops of like 10 years ago. I mean wow dude wow.
@@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty now just calm down dude, xbox one X runs the game yes at locked 30 fps, but in actual NATIVE 4k in rdr 2 😅still this igpu is impressive
Even 780m is faster than gtx1650. The 1650 is limited to 4GB of video memory and as soon as it exceeds it, 780m simply destroys it. 890m, although not much faster, we are gradually approaching the gtx 1660.
The problem with desktop APU is market demands, there's a reason basically every iteration of APUs by AMD are launched in the mobile market first before maybe they adapt it to the desktop market. We probably have to wait close to a year, if they bother to launch it that is, for 8600G and 8700G replacement
@@harrisnasir5753 They still got a way to go but within the next couple gens they should probably see some market share. APUs have some clear benefits over system made up of dedicated components. All of the chips sitting on one PCB + the memory acting as unified memory causes them to be about 2x as efficient. For every data transfer a console has to make, a PC has to make 4. So they'll definitaly have their advantages but it'll need more time for them to arrive in the desktop market.
10:17, the single core performance is really fast. Just slightly losing to the 12900K. So there shouldn't be a CPU bottleneck in CS2. Can somebody care to explain the low fps? I mean I think, the fps itself is really good and I think is an expected behavior of that APU, so I think that something is up with the reporting of the GPU usage, or something is bottlenecking or lacking somewhere else. Would have been really good if we could see the CPU clock speeds. Maybe they are being throttled for some reason or whatever?
Only thing I can think of is that the game might be running in some of the e cores? Still doesn't make sense because it's CS... It's very unfortunate that the frequency doesn't show up in afterburner
@@TuxikCE Probably the fault of CS2 rather than the mini PC itself. Also the mini PC ram speeds aren't that good...yet. Still extremely impressive just look what it does in RDR2.
impressive how iGPU performance has improved over the recent times i remember having a radeon vega 11 back then and i thought it was the future of iGPU gaming for me 6 years ago
I used to know that type of belt model is makes it more expensive if other brand make a smaller and use a type of cheaper build like aluminium and plastic will make a little cheaper maybe around $800 at least then I’ll buy it because if it has a port that I can use to connect external graphic card I can use an external EGPU
I'm still impressed an igpu is doing better than a dedicated 2015 gpu when I had problems running pubg back in the day, well I guess not it has been nearly 9 years! but igpu's are rather solid right now.
@@daaviddaveyeah but computer igpus have always had a rough time playing catchup to a consoles igpu so its cool and interesting to see one beating that console
igpu have long reached the PS4 level. The PS4 has a gpu level of r7 265 or gtx 750ti, and the same Vega 7 or 8 gives the performance of gtx 950-gtx 1050.
@@WTF_9995 I might be out of the loop on igpus then cause my last igpu was intel uhd graphics on my i5 1021ou laptop and it was only good enough for playable frame rates at 540p extremely light games like persona 4
The GPU inside PS4 is not exactly fast. It is more or less similar to HD78070/7850 a mid range from 2012. That is 12 years ago. The gpu in Xbone is even more slower. I think even phone SoC can already reach that kind of performance.
17:41 Happy to see AMD hasnt fixed the exact issue why i vowed to never buy an AMD GPU ever again. Had 4 Gpus from them. ALL had the same Driver Problems as seen in the Video. And most of the time they crashed around the 1h mark. This is the sole reason why i pay a few bucks more for a NVIDIA Card because at least THEY JUST WORK. 8 Months now with my 4070ti Super. Had exactly 1 driver problem, and that was more of a ''Windows decided to delete all kinds of drivers'' problem.
Mini-PCs are for casual gaming and mostly used for work or general web browsing. However, the iGPU keeps getting better every 2 years for these mini-PCs. In another 2 years, it will be on par with the PS5 in terms of raw TFLOPs. Now will it have the same optimization is another discussion.
The state of gaming is so shii right now that I'm kinda contemplating buying a mini PC in the future instead of a full tower. It's still amazing how far we've come since 2018 and it's all thanks to AMD for sparking that competition light once again.
Shader compilation can occur on the fly, then you'll have stutters like previously. Now they do it on the loading screen, so when you get to the game everything is loaded already and it doesn't stutter!
yo, would most def wanna see you benchmark stalker 2 on a 3060 when it drops, currently what im saving up for and kinda wanna see how well it does since its also a game i wanna play too 🙏
@@tyler6602 Oh yeah thats true, it has 8 extra CU's. Part of me wonders why AMD, sony and microsoft didn't just make this bespoke hardware a PC as well, the value would be insane.
It's sometimes close to a 1650 in performance, depends on the game.. that's an entry level card from 5 years ago so yeah 😅 Impressive for an iGPU, not worth the price
The tdp of the gpu is so low at 40-60W, is there a way to increase it? Maybe it could raise the fps. Also, i realised that in cyberpunk and csgo, the clock speed is quite a bit lower than in other games which usually hover around 2800MHz, maybe an optimisation issue?
"Is that a Beelink SER 9 mini Gaming PC in your pocket..OR are you just happy to see me?" 😁
I Understand now😂
Bruh LMAO
arrest me but make it sexy
a mobile apu now rivals my RX 580, how far we've come in only a few years. really cool to see :)
High end apu rivals mid range from almost 8 years old, not very surprising but good to see indeed.
its way stronger than your RX 580. actualy, the 8700g is about a 1650, and the HX AI MAX (dumb name) will be like a 4060ti.
@@silvioantonio6952 HX AI MAX. If it seems like a serious competitor for the current mid-range dedicated GPUs, it's crazy, the 8700g is not bad but it competes with mid-range GPUs from many years ago.
@@silvioantonio6952 i used to have a 1650 and every time vram exceed 4gb it just crash or became stuttery
I only had 2666 ddr4 at the time can't ask much about it
These apu on other hand can be set to 16gb and eat even more without losing performance i believe
@@lukasgroot Yep. It's nothing. Recall the difference between a Geforce 3 Ti and a Riva Tnt 2. 2 years, 10x faster.
I now have a pc worse than a mini pc now
At least you have a computer
@@juanjosealmanzar6330yeah
Damn bro, time for an upgrade?
@@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty no, FSR will save me
@@cubekoss7547 If it's FSR 3.1 then yeah, otherwise no. I'd also be careful for CPU bottlenecks. It's always better to be GPU bound than CPU bound.
This mini PC plays Cyberpunk better than my 2016 build did. Simply amazing how far we've come. If only FSR 3.1 was available in all games. Think what we will have by 2030. This is amazing.
AMD will be unveiling a monster 16-core and 40CU APU in January next year, leaks say the iGPU's performance is around a desktop 4060Ti. It's going to be expensive no doubt, but I can totally see that APU in a mini PC like this performing similarly to a 12900K and RTX 4060Ti.
Edit: it's the 4060Ti, not 4060.
@hasnihossainsami8375 That's insane! Any APU faster than a 2060 seems like black magic to me. Almost sounds impossible.
@@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty 2060 isn't really a high bar to clear these days, in fact the 890M in this video can actually get pretty close with faster memory like LPDDR5X 8533Mhz. The Beelink model is massively bandwidth starved, which is why lowering resolution/using FSR doesn't net a substantial uplift in framerates.
@@hasnihossainsami8375 That's just not true at all. The 2060 IS a high bar to clear. Most gamers don't have RTX cards. Most gamers GPUs are weaker than the 2060. The 890M is damn impressive but let's not pretend like the 2060 isn't hard to beat. It is.
@@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty apologies for my vague wording, I meant to say that the 2060 isn't a high bar to clear for modern iGPUs. Like I said, the 890M can get close with faster memory, and the upcoming monster APU will be so much faster that it'll probably run circles around the 2060, though maybe not in RT applications - AMD's flavor of RT is weak.
The biggest hurdle with iGPUs is memory bandwidth, and the monster APU solves this by having a 256-bit interface, which is only available with LPDDR5X. Pair that with the upcoming LPDDR5X 10700MHz and you've got ~356GB/s bandwidth, which is way more than the 4060Ti's 288GB/s. Even if they pair it with the slower but cheaper and readily available 8533MHz you're getting 272GB/s which is still pretty close.
APUs need to get faster ram, so that the iGPU is not bottlenecked by RAM as much.
good thing faster ram will exist in the future, and it will not be anything like DDR6, it's completely something new as we have found out before
It has fast ram, 7500Mhz soldered memory with 32 gb capacity and most of the time iGPU gets at least 8gb so you are not getting ram much faster than this unless you go quad channel.
And TDP too, iGPU drops frequency from 2900mhz to 2000mhz.
@@iraklimgeladze5223 i think is manly heat that lowers clock speeds and fps, isnt?
Just use sdram like apple chips
Very impressive what this little thingy can do!
That RAM bandwidth is a huge bottleneck here, the GTX 1650 mobile that I had is a much slower GPU that had higher memory bandwidth than the 890M and the bandwidth was still holding back its stock performance 💀
A mac mini comparison would be interesting
The Mac Mini is half the price and I'd probably say they'd get very similar performance. The M4 Pro ($1300, so it's not entirely fair) absolutely TROUNCES the 890M. Baldurs gate 3 performs the same at 1440p on the M4 Pro compared to the 890M at1080p. Tough to get comparable games though.
@@zagohcap Half the price is the 16gb-250gb ssd version (un-usable for gaming). If you wanna match the 32gb-1tr it's more expensive and then it probably makes more sense to get the Pro. Plus the choice of properly optimised games for MacOS is very limited so most of the time they will run worse than the SR9.
Kryzzp oiling up when??!!🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥
Lmao
AYO
@@ImnotindangerIamthedanger Oh yeah baby lfg
Gen alpha trash found
@@Apocalypse33 bro what??!! You think kryzzp has a audience under 16?
I expected more! Compared to my GMKtec K6, the increase is minimal, and the price is half as much. Apparently, performance improvements in a small form factor should not be expected until the release of DDR6 memory. Thanks for the video!
The actual CPU chip itself makes it that expensive. AMD can sell it because it is undoubtedly faster than Core Ultra 9 185H, which Intel themselves already priced really high for 45 W TDP mobile CPU.
Now officially I have a laptop that has worse gpu than a IGPU
This APU is a clear proof that "powerful budget APU" isn't a real thing and is not possible. The only powerful APUs are either sold in bulk over a contract to console makers like SONY/MS or they are from Apple who sell an "end product" and sell other services to recoup the cost.
Console APUs aren't that powerful, they just run well because of optimization. If I'm not mistaken, the PS5 GPU is equalivent to a GTX 1650.
@@TheRealPGTquite a bit faster than 1650 lol
It's a 6700 non-XT equivalent, which is twice as fast as 1650
@@TheRealPGT lmao the PS5 GPU is exactly like an RX 6700 or RTX 4060. 1650?! You must be joking fr
@@TheRealPGT You are mistaken. The PS5's Hardware is much, much faster than a GTX 1650.
The PS4 Pro does better than 1650
Not only do you make excellent benchmark videos you also provide entertainment for my cat since he just jumped up as I was watching the video and started trying to catch your mouse pointer lol
You should make a video comparing this IGPU to an GTX 1650 of yours. That will be interesting.
@@leexy3395 Who would win? Tbh I'm leaning towards the mini PC in this battle 😂
@@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty Hahaha me too honestly
@@leexy3395 It can literally fit in your pocket yet plays RDR2 better than XB1X which is just CRAZY!!! Tons of performance out of a tiny little thing compared to the top end desktops of like 10 years ago. I mean wow dude wow.
@@ThunderTheBlackShadowKitty now just calm down dude, xbox one X runs the game yes at locked 30 fps, but in actual NATIVE 4k in rdr 2 😅still this igpu is impressive
Even 780m is faster than gtx1650. The 1650 is limited to 4GB of video memory and as soon as it exceeds it, 780m simply destroys it. 890m, although not much faster, we are gradually approaching the gtx 1660.
they still didnt make shader cache for nvidia cards on fortnite
Fortnite sucks anyway so it's not a loss
Even if they didn't, the stuttering was a lot more bearable than usual so maybe Epic actually did some optimization
It runs better on Radeon. The stutters are much lesser. 🤷🏻♀️🥴
About time for AMD to reveal the 9600G. That should be a killer chip.
The problem with desktop APU is market demands, there's a reason basically every iteration of APUs by AMD are launched in the mobile market first before maybe they adapt it to the desktop market. We probably have to wait close to a year, if they bother to launch it that is, for 8600G and 8700G replacement
@@harrisnasir5753 They still got a way to go but within the next couple gens they should probably see some market share. APUs have some clear benefits over system made up of dedicated components. All of the chips sitting on one PCB + the memory acting as unified memory causes them to be about 2x as efficient. For every data transfer a console has to make, a PC has to make 4. So they'll definitaly have their advantages but it'll need more time for them to arrive in the desktop market.
10:17, the single core performance is really fast. Just slightly losing to the 12900K. So there shouldn't be a CPU bottleneck in CS2. Can somebody care to explain the low fps? I mean I think, the fps itself is really good and I think is an expected behavior of that APU, so I think that something is up with the reporting of the GPU usage, or something is bottlenecking or lacking somewhere else. Would have been really good if we could see the CPU clock speeds. Maybe they are being throttled for some reason or whatever?
Only thing I can think of is that the game might be running in some of the e cores? Still doesn't make sense because it's CS...
It's very unfortunate that the frequency doesn't show up in afterburner
@@TuxikCE Probably the fault of CS2 rather than the mini PC itself. Also the mini PC ram speeds aren't that good...yet. Still extremely impressive just look what it does in RDR2.
Strix Halo will be madness
impressive how iGPU performance has improved over the recent times
i remember having a radeon vega 11 back then and i thought it was the future of iGPU gaming for me 6 years ago
1:20 i feel like that's a "justifying the price" kinda feature, if it's expensive
Knew it lol
for a mini pc thats great (not enough yet for mainstream) but its going in a very good direction !!
30 FPS at 1080p on a $1000 PC is a crazy rip off 💀
Damn! This puts my 3700x to shame, but I still love it.
Could you test older games on these? Like NFS: The Run? Early to mid 2010 games?
Great vid!
same with my 3900xt
2:22 oranges?
Yeah!
@@zWORMzGaming greece?
@@zWORMzGamingI love the taste of oranges, they're my favorite fruits
Do more of these mini Pc's.
I havn't seen enough
The whole world are kneeling in front of the mac mini, but this is soooo much better !
What this thing is insane for igpu. I guess the only downside is that the vram is really slow because it uses the system ram.
My gtx 1650 crying in a corner
Hey Krysp, can you test a laptop with mx graphics card ( mx350, mx450..)
MX 550 and 570 too, they're essentially GTX 1650/RTX 2050 that is handicapped with 2gb vram
I used to know that type of belt model is makes it more expensive if other brand make a smaller and use a type of cheaper build like aluminium and plastic will make a little cheaper maybe around $800 at least then I’ll buy it because if it has a port that I can use to connect external graphic card I can use an external EGPU
I know its unrelevant but I'm curious how it would compare to the apple 1000 $ 32gb m4 mini
Apple will perform better on productivity apps.Games not sure, depends on optimizations done for Mac to handle the same.
is the m4 mac mini not more powerful?
Powerful in some cases like mac native apps
For pc gaming it won't even boot the game and pc apps also not full support
21:19 you can change it's bind in the settings to toggle it back. Most useless feature ever btw.
do you know why fortnite freezes and fps drops on this season?
Poor optimization
Assassins Creed whole series re-visit please (like you did with 3080)
Finally you added BF 2024 to your benchmarks. I hope next time you will choose the 128 players mode that stresses the cpu.
Mac mini video coming?
what did bob ever do to bro
This type of technology is the future ❤️❤️
How could you not test it with AFMF
Why didnt you use fsr 3.1 and frame gen in Cyberpunk?
It doesn't have FSR 3.1 and frame gen isn't working properly, you need a mod to disable vignette for it to work
Can it run monster hunter wild?
Basically, no
the iGPU will be too weak.
Polygon or 15 fps. Pick your poison. 🤣🥴
Reminds me of the good old days of the Intel Hd 520.......Oh how many games I tried to no avail.
Weird, i expected more in cs2. Maybe the cpu wasn't at full power?
That's a hot little box ! I cannot find it in my country on amazon, but they do have the ser8. Im gonna keep looking !
Hi bro you have all my respects for everything are you doing
Hey Krizp, could i request more tests in warthunder, especially in the lower end systems, thx love the content
I usually test that game with older DX11 GPUs. Super easy to run 🙂
@@zWORMzGaming okay, thx kryzp, keep up the great vids
Brro
You are Pro player cs 2 😮😮😮😮💀
A mini pc is more powerful than my desktop pc
try testing the rx 5600xt. i got one for 100$ and its a Beast !
14:27 nice a-train reference right there
I'm still impressed an igpu is doing better than a dedicated 2015 gpu when I had problems running pubg back in the day, well I guess not it has been nearly 9 years! but igpu's are rather solid right now.
Are you going to test gpus in stalker 2?
Yes
Two Kryzzp videos? We're eating!
We are FEASTING 😂
Can you test all games in one time in raw or test one game and rest some time and test another one ?
bro my 3070 gets 120 fps and very stuttery with those settings and my gpu usage is always below 50
yeah that walking bug in FN is very annoying😂
It's not a bug, it happens when you press the period or comma on your keyboard, I found out the hard way
@ oooohhh thx
This is better than a GTX 1650, right ?
It's similar
Crazy how this tiny PC is equal to or better than a mid range build from 2016-2017. I mean WOW dude!!!
iGpu mini pc beating the old ps4 🤯
Ps4 was released 10 years ago
@@daaviddaveyeah but computer igpus have always had a rough time playing catchup to a consoles igpu so its cool and interesting to see one beating that console
igpu have long reached the PS4 level. The PS4 has a gpu level of r7 265 or gtx 750ti, and the same Vega 7 or 8 gives the performance of gtx 950-gtx 1050.
@@WTF_9995 I might be out of the loop on igpus then cause my last igpu was intel uhd graphics on my i5 1021ou laptop and it was only good enough for playable frame rates at 540p extremely light games like persona 4
this would be similar to a Xbox Series S
All that with 50w of total power usage is awesome
I rushed to your channel days after Chapter 2 Remix to see if you dropped Weeping Woods again. :D
I love how you call every horse roach😂😂
That's insane! This is like ps4/xbone level of performance in a mini pc
The GPU inside PS4 is not exactly fast. It is more or less similar to HD78070/7850 a mid range from 2012. That is 12 years ago. The gpu in Xbone is even more slower. I think even phone SoC can already reach that kind of performance.
Rather Ps4 Pro and Xbox one X. But those were bottlenecked by their CPUs. Even the Z1 Extreme in ROG Ally is similar
idk why amd doesn't creates an AI powered version of fsr with these new gpus
"Not from behind"
- Kryzzp
The stuttering is because you do not have G-sync enabled.
17:41 Happy to see AMD hasnt fixed the exact issue why i vowed to never buy an AMD GPU ever again.
Had 4 Gpus from them. ALL had the same Driver Problems as seen in the Video. And most of the time they crashed around the 1h mark.
This is the sole reason why i pay a few bucks more for a NVIDIA Card because at least THEY JUST WORK.
8 Months now with my 4070ti Super. Had exactly 1 driver problem, and that was more of a ''Windows decided to delete all kinds of drivers'' problem.
💪This is the AMD Power ! ! ! 👌
Should turn multi threading off to alleviate the CPU bound issues
crazy how this mobile APU can be stronger then Last gen consoles
Mini-PCs are for casual gaming and mostly used for work or general web browsing. However, the iGPU keeps getting better every 2 years for these mini-PCs. In another 2 years, it will be on par with the PS5 in terms of raw TFLOPs. Now will it have the same optimization is another discussion.
MY GT 1030 AND I5 3TH GEN IS CRYING IN THE CORNER
"Eat dirt bob!"
-Kryzzp
2:30 Damn .. The lens flare are amazing in this game
Beautiful shot 😃
@@zWORMzGaming Yesuu ✨💜💜
even with my rtx4090 CS2 stutters. my fps dips from 400 to low 100s far too many times
Damn, they broke it then!
@@n9ne Yeah I stopped playing CS the second it became CS2. Frankly I never found CSGO fun anyway. Always preferred CSS.
benchmark rx 6400 in farlight
The state of gaming is so shii right now that I'm kinda contemplating buying a mini PC in the future instead of a full tower. It's still amazing how far we've come since 2018 and it's all thanks to AMD for sparking that competition light once again.
Just gotta wait till igpus can handle ray tracing 😂😂😂😂
with an egpu this will be a gaming beast
I love u man could u do more 4070 ti super and 4080 super test in various games plssss
The only thing it needs is an integrated display for peak gaming!
Wormz do you think 890m has better performance than 780m in BF2042 because it looks the same thanks
my god, you are running cp2077 at not even low settings with above 35 fps, and stable frames as well, my god i love technology
Mac mini with gaming capabilities 😁😁
22:13 huh? i didnt know xD so what do you mean? its quite intresting haha
Shader compilation can occur on the fly, then you'll have stutters like previously.
Now they do it on the loading screen, so when you get to the game everything is loaded already and it doesn't stutter!
@@zWORMzGaming Not every shader is compiled though.
@@zWORMzGaming ohh so i guess its that „directx 12 shaders“ option whej you download the game. thank you!
yo, would most def wanna see you benchmark stalker 2 on a 3060 when it drops, currently what im saving up for and kinda wanna see how well it does since its also a game i wanna play too 🙏
What app do U use to tell the FPS for These games? I think U used another one in the past about 3 years ago am I right?
MSI afterburner and RTSS,
I've always been using it, but I've been adapting it to look better over time.
I have a video on it if you're interested :)
@zWORMzGaming yes please I will go look for it now!
Whay you use FSR 2.1 in Cyberpunk if them already get FSR 3.0 implemented?
"AcTuaLLy tHe XBox sEries X Is thE fAsTEst iGPU fOr GaMIng"
Would it not be the PS5 pro now? Lol
@@tyler6602 Oh yeah thats true, it has 8 extra CU's. Part of me wonders why AMD, sony and microsoft didn't just make this bespoke hardware a PC as well, the value would be insane.
It's fast enough to a point it's actually dissapointing compared to proper dGPUs lol
It's sometimes close to a 1650 in performance, depends on the game.. that's an entry level card from 5 years ago so yeah 😅
Impressive for an iGPU, not worth the price
Isnt the Nvidia GTX 1070 Discrete GPU equivalent to the 890M?
See! Size doesn`t matter 🤭
Speaking of iGPU, the fastest now is Apple silion M4's GPU. But of course, I prefer Windows and x86 iGPU for playing games.
Can you try blk ops 3 zombies next time please? Love to see if it would play at 2k max settings
sous titre non disponible....
Main question. Is it better than gt710? 🤔 ... 😂
I had a i3-10100 which have 4cores and 8threads, can u pls try games on this spec? and make a review like other video's?
i wanna see this performing in BeamNG drive so bad
The tdp of the gpu is so low at 40-60W, is there a way to increase it? Maybe it could raise the fps. Also, i realised that in cyberpunk and csgo, the clock speed is quite a bit lower than in other games which usually hover around 2800MHz, maybe an optimisation issue?
hey, can you make a video showing this pc with the 8 zen5c cores disabled?