Ammo Can Campfire Battle: LAVABOX vs IGNIK FIRECAN

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
  • Folks, made this video,to,help you if you are trying to decide between either the LAVABOX AMMO CAN or the IGNIK FIRECAN for a portable campfire solution. The full review I did a on the LAVABOX can be found below!
    Hope everyone has a safe Memorial weekend and see you next week on the next camping adventure!
    Brian
    LAVABOX REVIEW
    • LAVABOX | Portable cam...
    Amazon affiliate link below for the perfect range bag that fits both of these products
    amzn.to/3PHJHWm
  • ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน

ความคิดเห็น • 136

  • @lavaboxcampfire
    @lavaboxcampfire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    Thanks for the great review, Brian! We are a tiny company and these reviews really help. Thanks to everyone for the support.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      👍🏻👍🏻

    • @jacoe33333
      @jacoe33333 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hi. I used my friend lava box the past weekend. It was great but first time a lightening it my hand hair was gone. The after about 10 minutes the hose where it connects to lavabox got melted and actually slid off. I was not there and my wife said that the flame was coming out the hose. I managed to cut and clean the metal end cap and press it back on the hose. With allot of effort I got the hose back on the piece that connects to hose. Not sure why this happened but I think that connecting screw needs to be tight. I love the box but will buy one and home they change to the quick connect. Can it be changed with quick connect hose connector?

    • @Coycoke
      @Coycoke ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi

  • @xrider357
    @xrider357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I like the flame of the Lava Box. Both seem expensive, but I'd pay a little more for sourced and made in the USA. Lava Box!

  • @muddyh2o2init44
    @muddyh2o2init44 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I questioned both until I meet a guy on the trail that used ceramic wood with the ignik. Hands down the nicer of the two. The side vents just help defuse the whole can look. It’s time lava box start stepping up with US made version.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      👍🏻👍🏻

    • @stephendavis2485
      @stephendavis2485 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I think people need to keep in mind if a usa made product is going to be competitive with an imported product, then the usa product will always need to simpler or less refined. Remember by supporting US manufacturing you will make sure that we keep some of that capacity and innovation stateside, which is important since none of these product ideas are developed overseas, just copied/stolen later.

    • @michaellowe3518
      @michaellowe3518 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I added some pumice stones to my Ignik. Works great.

  • @billshirer4858
    @billshirer4858 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great review. Before your I saw your review, I thought I'd get the Ignik FireCan. After the review, I went with the Lavabox for three reasons. 1. Bigger Flame/More Heat, 2. You can cook with it (with the over/under apparatus).(You can't with the Ignik), and 3. Made in USA/Not made in China.

  • @crazynotme7606
    @crazynotme7606 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    The diffrence is a the regulator in the hose. Just replace the hose with a higher setting adjuster valve

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      👍🏻

    • @codemna
      @codemna 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Negative. I added a 20 PSI regulator and it doesn't make a difference. It's the quick connect attached to the Firecan that regulates how much propane is fed into the burner. If you drill that jet out you'll get double the flame output with the existing 5 psi regulator.

  • @03BigBear
    @03BigBear 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Thanks for another informative vid. I've got both. IMO though, I prefer the smaller, refined fire of the Ignik because in reality when will you ever need a 4-5 ft flame? The smaller flame still puts out a lot of heat, even more so when you add fire rocks or ceramic logs which give it a more campfire feel. Though as you say, its up to you. Aloha brother

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you!

    • @waxifari5528
      @waxifari5528 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here and same conclusion. Love to support a mom and pop but the lava box is more fiddley and puts insane/super sketchy amounts of heat directly onto the radiator hose. The external supply line on the ignik quick connect transfers nearly no heat to the hose.

    • @ilbercgross4736
      @ilbercgross4736 ปีที่แล้ว

      Honestly if you are in an area where woodfires are banned but propane can be used, the Ignik would be the safer bet. IMO.

  • @daneveasman5280
    @daneveasman5280 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for your positive and insightful review of both! It made my decision a lot easier! I am going with the lava box 😃🔥

  • @brendanwoerner3352
    @brendanwoerner3352 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Ignik may be made of China. However, Ignik is out of Bainbridge WA, USA. They have a great Warranty program for the Ignik. They don’t claim lifetime warranty but it’s pretty close. For large fires I get the other guy. I have my Ignik and it’s great for groups of 2-4. The newer model I have can be used as a grill for cooking and it works great. Plus if you’re drinking and having a good time it’s easy to shut down or light up. The other guy looks to be more dangerous if there is wind and a fire ban and you’re in a state park. Love my Ignik so far!

  • @6point1hemi
    @6point1hemi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I made one for around $70 including hose with regulator.

  • @Gazziza29
    @Gazziza29 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I was deciding between the two as well. Ultimately I got the Ignik Firecan. Namely because I got it for 50% off at REI for a total of $99. IMO at that price it couldn't be beat. Yes the Lavabox is a small business, made in the USA, probably built better and puts out a ton more BTU but it would have been over twice the price for was is essentially a novelty luxury item. I just couldn't justify the additional expense even though I wanted to support Lavabox. It didn't help that I wanted it for a trip and the Lavabox was OOS when I was looking.
    I do think the Firecan has a few features which make it much more user friendly. The integrated feet, propane quick disconnect, and side holes radiate a little heat to your legs/feet. The flame on the Firecan itself is a bit mundane and sterile looking, again just flames coming out of a metal pipe. I added some ceramic wood logs from Amazon to help diffuse the flame a bit. It created a much more natural flame and the flame is diffused and larger because of it. I think that's my biggest con with the Firecan, they should have included lava rocks at that price. You can now purchase their own branded stones which is a more recent "accessory". IMO you need to get some form of lava rock or diffuser with the Firecan. At $99 the Firecan was a no brainer and I love the purchase at that price point.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good choice for the price. Can’t beat $100 for the Ignik. I’ll need to look into finding some ceramic logs. I’ve only seen the large fireplace size logs.

    • @jjsambac
      @jjsambac ปีที่แล้ว +1

      did REI have a sale?

  • @gsansoucie
    @gsansoucie ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for this. Never heard of the Lava box before this. This put me over the top for the Ignik. It’s just the two of us, we don’t need to burn down a forest. Looks like everything could store within the Ignik box too, space is a premium for Fulltime RVers.

  • @kristiesconnections
    @kristiesconnections 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great comparison video! Ty!

  • @cjsoutdoors4412
    @cjsoutdoors4412 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent comparison review. I've decided I like the Ignik Firecan a llitle bit more over Lavabox. Plus I can get it on sale 20% OFF at REI.

  • @masonthurman
    @masonthurman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If that’s the minimum setting on the lava box I’d be worried that it’s not safe in dry California forests. The flame seems to touch the ground with wind, whereas the ignik sits lower in the can

  • @esiebert7625
    @esiebert7625 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Firecan for me all day, looks nicer, like the burner better, integrated feet, don’t have to buy accessories, IMO that is too much flame on the Lavabox, I’m mostly looking for ambience in the summer months, not heat, during cold months there is typically no burn bans so I would just do a wood fire instead. If you were going to roast marshmallows or hotdogs though the Firecan probably wouldn’t be a good choice as the flame is low and narrow. If you put ceramic logs or lava rocks in it the flame might be higher on it.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Eric! I’ll be using the Firecan this week on my next trip to really compare it. I’ve used the LAVABOX several times so want to give this Ignik a fair shake👍🏻

    • @camilrykowski5765
      @camilrykowski5765 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BrianWatersOutdoors hi great review! so whats the verdict?

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Camil. Honestly, it’s a toss up. They both have their pros and cons and they balance each other out. I use both now. The Lavabox for sure puts out more heat if that is what you need the most. The Ignik puts out a different type of flame that I think is just nicer looking.

  • @jimg7784
    @jimg7784 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Both are way to expensive for what they are. Especially the Lavabox. One man’s opinion.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is just an ammo can, so they are charging a premium for what it is for sure.

  • @adidas4275
    @adidas4275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Super helpful. I actually put my own quick connects on my lava box. But the bottom gets hot & the legs would be nice. That said I like the sturdiness of the lavabox. No rattles when driving around even with the lava rock in it.

    • @adidas4275
      @adidas4275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We cooked kabobs on our lavabox a week ago or so and it did a great job & the kids to marshmallows on it without issue

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      👍🏻👍🏻

  • @ThomasTribeTrails
    @ThomasTribeTrails ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this was a really good video. Really shows the differences. I bought a Lavabox.

  • @mmplumbing34
    @mmplumbing34 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I bought a Ignik. Brought it home, tried it out, and the rivets on the lid broke. I just ordered the lava box.

  • @macairtuber
    @macairtuber 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Tough call. Like the made in USA. But like the built in legs and quick release and side vents as I’d guess they help widen the heat area. Would appreciate your thoughts after using the ignik on your trip this week. 2 questions are: 1. Does it put out sufficient heat to stay warm for 5-6 people in 40-50° weather? If not - what do you think are it’s limits? 2. Which would you pick?

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is a tough call. For sure though neither give off enough heat in my opinion for 5 people. Maybe 2 people if you are close enough. I tend to prefer the Lavabox over Ignik, but they really are both good options.

  • @allkindsofoutdooractivities
    @allkindsofoutdooractivities 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very nice comparison video! Plus I love the Texas flag on the fence!

  • @focerzx3
    @focerzx3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful. Still a tough decision lol. Thank you!!

  • @TripodTorch
    @TripodTorch 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice through review! If you're interested in reviewing an even more Compact Campfire reach out, I'd love to chat with you about Tripod Torch.

  • @Element_lifestyle
    @Element_lifestyle ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Ignik I think also weight almost double the weight of the Lavabox

  • @kyfisher3662
    @kyfisher3662 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i wonder what the Idnik would be like with 1 layer of lava rocks init

  • @929cbr_rr
    @929cbr_rr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice comparison. Thanks for that.

  • @jkwithlove8180
    @jkwithlove8180 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this video. I was looking to purchase something like this for wimter camping. Did know where to look.

  • @velocity800
    @velocity800 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    show us the inside of the Lava Box so we see the difference

  • @jaynerice6693
    @jaynerice6693 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hahaha. Wow! and now I’ll watch your lava box review.

  • @Aztkw0lf
    @Aztkw0lf ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You had me at, "american made!"

  • @phantomphan1974
    @phantomphan1974 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for comparing. Saw the Lava box at Overland Expo West. Great shirt too. F35 Demo Team?

  • @cindygallegos4990
    @cindygallegos4990 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's the LavaBox for me all day long..

  • @jozamme
    @jozamme ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have them both i like the ignik better

  • @MWDAdventures
    @MWDAdventures 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If one cost 99.00 would that change your review. REI has the ignic for 99 free shipping.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’m really impartial to both now. I use both and like both.

  • @Mike-ju2vc
    @Mike-ju2vc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Which range bag is that? I’m getting the Lavabox ASAP. Thx for the vid.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Mike. I added a link in the description for the range bag. I went through several different ones and this one was the perfect size and have room for the hose and accessories too.

    • @Mike-ju2vc
      @Mike-ju2vc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you…just purchased a khaki one through your affiliate.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks dude👍🏻👍🏻🤛

  • @gary-fp8rw
    @gary-fp8rw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like to enjoy my fire. So the IGNIK for me.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      👍🏻 I’ll be using the Ignik this Thursday on my trip too.

  • @true.is.around
    @true.is.around 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ty

  • @kaywaters8687
    @kaywaters8687 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video!

  • @C69FH
    @C69FH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Show us the Ignik with them LavaBox stones.

  • @C69FH
    @C69FH 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow... that Lava box flame totally dangerous... You can't sit close to that thing on a windy cold ass day

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s wide open on the Lavabox. I would never use it that way, just wanted to show the difference between the two is all when it’s fully open n

  • @GearGadgetReviews
    @GearGadgetReviews 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thumbs up!!

  • @masonthurman
    @masonthurman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Weird question, but how does the sound compare on the lava box? My ignik is pretty noisy and smelly at mid to full blast.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are both fairly “hissy”. I’d say the Lavabox might be a bit more loud, but nothing I noticed until you asked this😂

  • @amythinks
    @amythinks ปีที่แล้ว

    First time viewer...wondering if this is an outdoor channel or a Festool channel.

  • @fpartidafpartida
    @fpartidafpartida ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can’t you just poke bigger holes in the ignik to make a bigger flame?

    • @codemna
      @codemna 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, drill out the jet in the quick-connect adaptor and it will double the flame.

  • @livinlite9549
    @livinlite9549 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How much propane does does the ignik use? Can you leave the lid attached,? & would it be safe in a cabin or shed?

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  ปีที่แล้ว

      It all depends on how much heat you want, but you can easily get a full weekend off if one 20lb tank. You cannot leave the lid on, and I wouldn’t recommend using this indoors either.

  • @joedysosa9048
    @joedysosa9048 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bro good videos 📹

  • @SSL0707Star
    @SSL0707Star ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, Is firecan good enough for marshmallow?

  • @TheXJthatCould
    @TheXJthatCould ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Propane and quick connect , no thank you, if u fk up and half ass that quick connect, you got a flame thrower 🤣😂🤣

  • @PittiesAndMore
    @PittiesAndMore ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would go with the one that is "Made in the USA" to support the American labor force rather than supporting the Chinese government IMO.

  • @FATHERSOFBASS
    @FATHERSOFBASS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks dope do you use a smoker?

  • @BIGflixx
    @BIGflixx ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Brian, does the lava box give off any kind of strong or mild odor while it burns? Lastly does it scorch/burn the ground below it and would you say it's safe to use on artificial turf and/or grass? Thank you!

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It does not give off an odor, but the box does get hot. It would probably melt the artificial turf underneath.

    • @BIGflixx
      @BIGflixx ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Brian, thanks for the timely response. Based on your experience, even when using Lava Box with the optional shelf they provide, do you think it stil gets hot enough to possibly melt turf or scorch grass? Any suggestions on what to place underneath? What do you do when using it on grass?

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      With the shelf it will be fine, and should not hurt the grass. I use that shelf directly on top of grass outdoors and it has been fine.

    • @BIGflixx
      @BIGflixx ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BrianWatersOutdoors Excellent. Thanks again Brian!

  • @GENECARP
    @GENECARP ปีที่แล้ว

    I went Tacticool….made in California I think

  • @AkMtnGem
    @AkMtnGem ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought the IGNIK Firecan last spring and just learned of the Lava Box. Can the LAVA Box over/under thingy fit on top of the IGNIK? I know IGNIK says you can't cook over it as it may cause damage but....

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t think so. The Ignik can seems to be a bit “thicker” and the over / under fits pretty tight on the Lavabox as it is already.

    • @alaskanjewel
      @alaskanjewel ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BrianWatersOutdoors thank you for the fast response, I appreciate it! Might you have any suggestions for something similar to put over the IGNIK?

    • @antonioromulodelcarmen283
      @antonioromulodelcarmen283 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not something to put over the Firecan… but if you can get the Firecan Deluxe, that has the grill inside already. Probably sell the old Firecan?

  • @ninjajack5568
    @ninjajack5568 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That whole setup is 20 dollars to make.... They're selling it for 75-150?
    I'll pass.

    • @BrianWatersOutdoors
      @BrianWatersOutdoors  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      👍🏻

    • @leekazan556
      @leekazan556 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You said it!!

    • @jplaysbay2929
      @jplaysbay2929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No its not the ammo can alone is 20 bucks ...the regulator and hose is another 20 to 25 ... expanded metal for yhe inside another 30 at homw depot ...I can go on ..and then there's time and yes I've built my own

    • @gailoss5919
      @gailoss5919 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll happily pay for someone else to do the work.

    • @philjung
      @philjung ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@gailoss5919how about $99? For that you get the ignik

  • @patriciam4123
    @patriciam4123 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    More flame and more danger in the WRONG hands. I'd rather have the Ignik.

  • @JoshuaThomasVideos
    @JoshuaThomasVideos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Obvious choice

  • @bigmtnrealtor2078
    @bigmtnrealtor2078 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ignik is junk.

    • @farmertoby2971
      @farmertoby2971 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How? Why do you think that?