Thank you for actually testing the LARQ bottle to see if it actually kills bio contaminants. From what I see it seems like it gives peace of mind for tap water, water fountain water and other more clean water sources that could have bio contaminants or after sitting around for awhile could. Like from different tap water sources this seems useful especially if you are traveling around etc... I'd love to see a video where you use tap water or even water from a water foundation. I know that's not it main purpose but it is the use case for most people to see how contaminated the water is and how well the LARQ actually does.
I'm having that bottle for more than 1 year now. I love it but yes, it does not integrate any filter. PureVis 2 model is coming on October WITH the integrated filter. It looks great and it is 1L instead of the 720ml. Take a look on their website you can even preorder it. Note the new PureVis 2 model is compatible with the normal filter and also another kind of more advanced filter that blocks heavy metals and other stuff. ===> thank you for the review, I share the exact same opinion about that bottle.
Great Work! Love your review, did a great job by testing it in the real world and answering all questions people might have. I believe this channel will go far!
@@TenThousandLines Feels wierd that they don't just sell the purevis 2 on there own site? They started on kickstarter then switched to Indiegogo. From the seems of it I can only buy the purevis 2 on Indiegogo and not there official site? This seems quite weird to me. I still buy it but I'd like them to just have all there products on there official site as they are already started.
what made you choose this version over the filtered bottle? also could you share results from a TDS reading between your tap water and the post-UV Larq water
Last place I'd ever buy a water bottle. Call me whatever but the last thing im doing is drinking out of a water bottle some else drank out of. I don't even really care drinking after people if I know them, I'd just pay the full 125$ for a water bottle that saves me time for cleaning it less that's worth it to me.
@@Timely-ud4rmnah brother I think you got it wrong, I’m talking about buying sealed products not used products You’ll get them for a steal if you just take sometime and search it up
My only question is whether or not I have to clean it still. I hate cleaning my water bottle. I’m drinking basically only tap water so i don’t care about filtering or cleaning it, but if it can keep the bottle clean for weeks without me using soap It’s an instant buy. 😂
@@lynxrbeam8732 Hmm from my experience you’d still need to clean it once every 3-5 days. It definitely stays cleaner longer than a regular water bottle, but i’ve noticed it still gets dirty around the mouth of the bottle - especially if you’re using it while eating.
Guys remember this is bacteria. Yes UV kills bacteria but the mineral is still there. So if you're informed that the tap water, river or any kind of raw water contains heavy metals below 0.01 ppm then go for larq.
I don't want this bottle. No need all that function, it's not worth it with 125$ . Better buy other brand like Yeti, Stanley, KK, Zojirushi, Hydroflask, Kinto, Revomax, Camebak...etc ,just about 35 bucks then you got a cool ultimate insulated bottle.
As soon as the guy said it's as effective as boiling water for 20 minutes, i knew he was full of shit because boiling water for a few seconds is just as effective as if you boiled it for a whole hour. Of corse, clearly the bottle works, but its more of the matter that the guy is full of it.
he meant as the activity of boiling water, when you boil water the water start at room temperature. why boil water for 20 minutes if it's already boiling? learn fking context
When sanitizing/sterilizing it is all about the sterility assurance level which is the percent chance of a harmful microbial surviving the treatment. This is usually looked at in terms of kill percentage and how long it takes for 90% of a microbial population to be killed off or one log reduction. This amount time is known as a D-value. This amount of time varies depending on the contaminate in question the temperature of exposure (if using thermal treatment methods usually 121.1 degrees C) and materials involved in the treatment (ie 316 SS). In order to obtain a specified SAL using a thermal sanitization method a certain amount of time is required where the environment must be exposed to these high temperatures. If a temperature of 121.1 dC is used with a known D-value of 2 minutes and If the exposure time is 2 minutes then this will result in one log reduction. Meaning 90% of microbial population will have been killed. However if we increase this exposure time to 20 minutes this is a 10 log reduction and 99.99999999% of the given microbial population will have been killed off. The higher the risk the longer the exposure phase should be.
This is the first review from the last 5 reviews I seen on youtube which has done the water tests. So far this is the most informational review,
Thanks for saying that! I figured that’s the most important aspect of the bottle
I think its the only review with water test. I love it!
@@TenThousandLines really appreciate reality test very much
No way you only have 110 subscribers. Your reviews are great
You’re too kind, thanks!
@@bruhda7469 True. I just subscribed.
Thank you for actually testing the LARQ bottle to see if it actually kills bio contaminants. From what I see it seems like it gives peace of mind for tap water, water fountain water and other more clean water sources that could have bio contaminants or after sitting around for awhile could. Like from different tap water sources this seems useful especially if you are traveling around etc... I'd love to see a video where you use tap water or even water from a water foundation. I know that's not it main purpose but it is the use case for most people to see how contaminated the water is and how well the LARQ actually does.
Great review!
Thanks for testing the project and sharing your experience.
I'm having that bottle for more than 1 year now. I love it but yes, it does not integrate any filter. PureVis 2 model is coming on October WITH the integrated filter. It looks great and it is 1L instead of the 720ml. Take a look on their website you can even preorder it. Note the new PureVis 2 model is compatible with the normal filter and also another kind of more advanced filter that blocks heavy metals and other stuff.
===> thank you for the review, I share the exact same opinion about that bottle.
Awesome review, you deserve more subs and views!!
Great Work! Love your review, did a great job by testing it in the real world and answering all questions people might have. I believe this channel will go far!
If you are watching this after May 15th 2024. There is a version 2. This new version has a UV light and filter built all in one.
Yep, I’d definitely buy that instead. It also has a mobile app and the pre order price is the same price as version 1.
I don’t see a bottle on their site that offers both??? Are you sure? If you find it can you link it?
@@votejenny here it is:
www.kickstarter.com/projects/livelarq/larq-bottle-purevis-2-purify-track-self-cleaning
@@TenThousandLines Feels wierd that they don't just sell the purevis 2 on there own site? They started on kickstarter then switched to Indiegogo. From the seems of it I can only buy the purevis 2 on Indiegogo and not there official site? This seems quite weird to me. I still buy it but I'd like them to just have all there products on there official site as they are already started.
My girlfriend pre-orderd this one for my birthday in september. They will ship it in October 2024!
Thank you for your detailed review...very well done!
nice video bro you have 1000x better value content and high work content than anyone else, you made all of this, great work.
@@MichePiece I appreciate the kind words! Thanks for watching!!
This is a high-quality and informative review
So cool! It’s missing stickers though
😂😂 yes!! i gotta get some
Awesome review !
nice proper short review. very good video
very helpful! Thank you!
Could you review the owala bottle next? I know it doesn’t have UV light but I hear it’s really good
if my girlfriend let’s me borrow her’s! but just so you know i’m team larq all the way 🤗
I just got the newer LARQ Bottle PureVis 2.. pretty rad. Addresses some of the things you mentioned.
Great video dude! I'll be buying when on sale this christmas
thanks sissy ❤ yah!!
really good video bro!!!
Very informative video. Thank you 👍
What kind of water do you use besides lake water? Tap? Thanks! 😊
Fortunately, now the bottle with both options exists :) it’s the LARQ Bottle PureVis™ 2
great review, thank you
Will it purify salty ocean water?
Hello I’m going to Thailand will it good to take it there for water fountain or the tap water there ?
Very helpful, thank you
what made you choose this version over the filtered bottle? also could you share results from a TDS reading between your tap water and the post-UV Larq water
Could you do a review with the new Purevis 2 with the same tests please?
Thanks for the awesome real world testing 😅
So do you need to charge it???? Kind of worthless if you do.
Whoever is interested eBay always got a few going for much cheaper and they are unused
Yep, definitely an option to consider!
Last place I'd ever buy a water bottle. Call me whatever but the last thing im doing is drinking out of a water bottle some else drank out of. I don't even really care drinking after people if I know them, I'd just pay the full 125$ for a water bottle that saves me time for cleaning it less that's worth it to me.
@@Timely-ud4rmnah brother
I think you got it wrong, I’m talking about buying sealed products not used products
You’ll get them for a steal if you just take sometime and search it up
How does it compare with typical nanotubes water filters?
Can you try out the Nuvoe Pod?
My only question is whether or not I have to clean it still. I hate cleaning my water bottle. I’m drinking basically only tap water so i don’t care about filtering or cleaning it, but if it can keep the bottle clean for weeks without me using soap It’s an instant buy. 😂
@@lynxrbeam8732 Hmm from my experience you’d still need to clean it once every 3-5 days. It definitely stays cleaner longer than a regular water bottle, but i’ve noticed it still gets dirty around the mouth of the bottle - especially if you’re using it while eating.
Guys remember this is bacteria. Yes UV kills bacteria but the mineral is still there. So if you're informed that the tap water, river or any kind of raw water contains heavy metals below 0.01 ppm then go for larq.
Can you test the monos uv water bottle?
R you excited about the larq bottle coming with a filter
I’m hyped!! Definitely getting one of those!
@@TenThousandLines I just ordered one on kickstarter to can’t wait to get it
“I don’t drink lake water very often” LMAOOO
I don't want this bottle. No need all that function, it's not worth it with 125$ . Better buy other brand like Yeti, Stanley, KK, Zojirushi, Hydroflask, Kinto, Revomax, Camebak...etc ,just about 35 bucks then you got a cool ultimate insulated bottle.
👏🏽👏🏽
As soon as the guy said it's as effective as boiling water for 20 minutes, i knew he was full of shit because boiling water for a few seconds is just as effective as if you boiled it for a whole hour. Of corse, clearly the bottle works, but its more of the matter that the guy is full of it.
😐
he meant as the activity of boiling water, when you boil water the water start at room temperature. why boil water for 20 minutes if it's already boiling?
learn fking context
When sanitizing/sterilizing it is all about the sterility assurance level which is the percent chance of a harmful microbial surviving the treatment. This is usually looked at in terms of kill percentage and how long it takes for 90% of a microbial population to be killed off or one log reduction. This amount time is known as a D-value. This amount of time varies depending on the contaminate in question the temperature of exposure (if using thermal treatment methods usually 121.1 degrees C) and materials involved in the treatment (ie 316 SS). In order to obtain a specified SAL using a thermal sanitization method a certain amount of time is required where the environment must be exposed to these high temperatures. If a temperature of 121.1 dC is used with a known D-value of 2 minutes and If the exposure time is 2 minutes then this will result in one log reduction. Meaning 90% of microbial population will have been killed. However if we increase this exposure time to 20 minutes this is a 10 log reduction and 99.99999999% of the given microbial population will have been killed off. The higher the risk the longer the exposure phase should be.
"There's no one behind that camera"😂
You should test it with water from India. 😂😂😂