2.5.3 Electric Field on a Conductor; the Force on a Surface Charge

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @tokkia1384
    @tokkia1384 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    “He leaves a lot to your imagination” basically a great summary of the entire textbook 🤦‍♀️

    • @playboicarti_vamp
      @playboicarti_vamp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, if u have time then it will be a great book but if u don't u can't keep imagining ..

    • @briannguyen6994
      @briannguyen6994 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Every time he tells you to imagine a scenario, I'm like "Here we go again....."

  • @ogtrev570
    @ogtrev570 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    These videos have been a really great tool for visualizing the concepts, since Griffith really does leave a lot to the imagination as you said. Students just need to do research beyond the videos, combining resources, to get a better scope of the material.

  • @JulieanGalak
    @JulieanGalak 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So the external electric field is proportional to the charge distribution. Clearly the charge distribution isn't causing the external field. So does the external field change the charge distribution? Is this because of induction? Can one conclude that if you were to increase the outside electric field, sigma would increase to compensate?

    • @jg394
      @jg394  6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes, the external field changes the charge distribution inside the conductor. The charges inside the conductor are free to move around. If there is any net E field inside the conductor, then the charges will flow until the net E field is zero. In effect, the charge distribution inside the conductor is such that it creates an E field exactly opposite to the external field inside the conductor. (Outside the conductor, magic happens.) Thus, if you doubled the external E field, the E field due to the charge distribution would have to compensate by doubling. Since E is proportional to q, q has to double as well.

    • @JulieanGalak
      @JulieanGalak 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Real Physics - OK, that’s what I got from the equations, but wanted to confirm. Makes sense, thanks.

    • @jg394
      @jg394  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No prob. I'm rusty, but these first chapters are pretty straightforward. Don't ask me about wave guides though -- I'd have to polish up again.

  • @vorkutabrothers4416
    @vorkutabrothers4416 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    what do you mean by electric field at the surface and outside the surface?

  • @nehahahahahahahaha
    @nehahahahahahahaha 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice and little bit confusing topic ... thanks for making this video

  • @ShephineShaji
    @ShephineShaji 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, aren't you forgetting a 2 in the denominator for the electric field just outside the surface, as you did in a previous video?

  • @luis-vv3lw
    @luis-vv3lw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this explanation.

  • @mickeybanerjee1
    @mickeybanerjee1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When do we use sigma by epsilon and when do we use sigme by 2x epsilon

    • @tokkia1384
      @tokkia1384 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Abhimanyu Banerjee half the field is above and half below, so it’s (1/2)σ(Eabove + Ebelow)

  • @saad1264
    @saad1264 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks

  • @YossiSirote
    @YossiSirote ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve been loving your videos, but you lost me on this one.

  • @manavshah6811
    @manavshah6811 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanxx

  • @jollyjeevan6683
    @jollyjeevan6683 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    🆒️

  • @musicislife665
    @musicislife665 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    just confused

    • @jg394
      @jg394  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      What can I do to help? What's confusing?

    • @bihanchatterjee7634
      @bihanchatterjee7634 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Real Physics what is the difference between E(above) and E(out)?

  • @dildarali3096
    @dildarali3096 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You are reading just the book

  • @dildarali3096
    @dildarali3096 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You are reading just the book