I have a very low hour GT50 and ST60 as well as a F8500 with 11,000 hours which is still very low hour usage. This year I tried to move to OLED, I tried and returned 3 of them. What most people don't realize is when you transition to OLED from plasma you are actually transitioning to a dimmer image on average. This is because HDR has a lower average luminosity than SDR. Watch the same content on your plasma and OLED and it will look substantially brighter on the plasma. This is counterintuitive but true, SDR is much brighter and more lively than HDR. You miss out on the high hit specular highlights but that is only a tiny percentage of HDR content. I can to discover that SDR on high end plasma looks far better than HDR on OLED and this is for a lot of reasons. I am no longer looking to upgrade!
The st60 is actually better than the zt. It has higher peak brightness and less aggressive anti-glare filter so it has more vibrant colors. I'd take your st60 over any OLED.
So sad that Plasma is dying .. I went with LCD over plasma because it was lighter, brighter, arguably longer lasting, not prone to burn in, uses less power, puts out less heat, etc. etc... Now I feel like I will be forever missing out on that superior picture quality!! Those vibrant and life-like colors, those inky blacks!!!! :' (
Wrong wrong wrong... OLED is the future but not yet.. No they don't have superior colours.. Not yet! The best plasma's are still the best tv's. I'm not biased I own a 60in KURO.. The 65VT65B and owned a LG OLED.. OLED isn't ready yet.
bliglum Plasma haven't had issues with Burn in for years. What you are talking about is ' Image retention" which goes away rather quickly, and the High end models like this Panasonic had technology in it to combat the image retention thing , though it is still susceptible to it though. Everything else is correct though, uses more energy, heavier, half life at 100,000 hours ( which is around 20 years watching it 8 hour a day!!) All that and Plasma still has far superior picture quality over LCD. I couldn't imaging owning a LCD TV.
tom11zz884 It was the heat that was the killer for me.. As I was looking for a screen to put in my mancave (spare bedroom), and having a large plasma in there acting like a space heater made it a no-go.. Especially because I live in a warm climate.
***** They still havent managed to fix the lagging or drag when the image is moving, and lets face it, in tv and movie images pan and move all the time, so that's a huge downside. Whenever I see TV reviews they always focus on resolution, very rarely on image quality. The resolution hysteria is just ridiculous. Even the best TVs has pixel noise, lag and all sorts of different artifacts like pixel swarms (when pixels looks crushed in sections of the image) and more problems. I just don't get the hype. I mean seriously, if you exclude the high resolution aspect we are better off watching a good CRT monitor! They still use Sonys Trinitron CRT monitors as reference in professional studio environments. I've watched those myself, the very deep 14" reference CRTs are superior in terms of image quality. Cause HD is not enough to create a well balanced pleasant image.
I love my Panasonic VT60 to death and I believe that it's the best television that I have ever laid eyes on. With that said, the Kuro is still an extremely close second. Unless you've actually seen a pro calibrated Kuro, you can't say that it's over. Yes they are as common as a 3 dollar bill, but they are true gems if you do get your hands on one. I'll take a Kuro over any other tv (aside from the VT and ZT) anyday.
@@aligueri3563 my ZT is still working. It’s calibrated and still looks more acurate than my oled especially the skin tones and greens. But my 600m kuro is better
Plasma is indeed better than OLED. SDR has a higher average luminosity level than HDR so content on plasma will surprisingly be much brighter than it is on OLED most of the time. Also noble gases ablaze on fire put out a much better quality of light than tiny led light bulbs. Plasma colors are rich warm and lush. OLED color is thin , artificial and hash. They are LCD TVs with perfect blacks. I really can't understand how previous high end plasma owners can be happy with OLED.
Both the ZT and the VT just equal the black level of the 60" stock 9G Kuros of .001. They do not surpass the 9.5Gs MLL of .0005 stock. However if one were to get a tweaked Kuro, then both the 9Gs and 9.5Gs can go to around .0001 MLL.
@@andreasd.barkas4845 nothing to do with the menu. It was the same with the pioneer the 500M monitor calibrated like a professional graded monitor, whilst the 500A didn’t.
@@pioneer2321 the 500m i have red that it had better PQ from 500A at specific parameters it was not only better calibrated ... so ZT has better PQ eg at motion , at flickering , at sharpness at contrast , at colour gamut or proper reproduction ? ... the calibration gives the best from any monitor and i just asked where the Zt is better ....
I just bought one to replace the Pioneer Elite PRO-141FD that my shipping company broke. The Panasonic was just delivered today and is still siting in the box. I hope it looks as good as my Pioneer did.
Over all, the Panasonic is a better TV than the Pioneer Elite. The picture quality, I think, is slightly better; the facial colors are more accurate; the black levels are just as good if not better; the TV can be brighter if you are in a bright room and the menus are much better. I am very happy with the TV. However, I wouldn't have replaced the Pioneer Elite if it wasn't broken.
@@carbonunit57 the skin tones on the Panasonics have too much red (even after calibration) Pioneers is super accurate so when you go to Panasonic it feels like they have a boost in the colour when in reality the pioneer is more accurate. The whites on Panasonics are not clean or uniform, line bleed is there and the picture isn’t clean like pioneers.
I'd be interested in hearing the 5 reasons why. And I'm not saying that to be smart, but I would sincerely like to know because I never had the chance to sit and actually enjoy a Kuro in person for an extended period of time.
The last few days i have the 65" VT60 and i would like to know which are in reality the differences with the ZT 60 regarding to the better antiglare filter that is something i don't really mind .
@@andreasd.barkas4845 it’s exactly the same. Keep the plasma. Because for all 1080p content you won’t get a better tv. Fantastic motion, accurate colour, great uniformity no banding.
@@pioneer2321 And the huge price difference was all about the better antiglare coating ? Yes the PQ is fantastic but after all these years my 65" model has problem at the whites at the corners , there is a pink tint , and generally uniformity issues even in blacks ... my previous 55" again vt60 was almost perfect .... i will surely keep my 65'' vt60 until it dies
@@pioneer2321 what about KRP vs ZT ? 🤔 ... unfortunately my 65" plasma has a lot of problems and i am thinking of getting extra fans so i can keep the temperature at lower levels because high heating with bad ventilation was caused these problems
Infelizmente esse modelo foi descontinuado faz tempo, e a panasonic nem está mais no Brasil, o unico jeito é esperar aparecer esse modelo no ebay e obviamente conseguir bastante dinheiro pra pagar essa TV!
You are absolutely right, plasmas have always been superior to lcd and the like when it comes to dark room picture quality. Retailers are being paid to show off the LED models so it's really just marketing wars.
The Samsung does have a brighter picture, but it lacks when it comes to deeper blacks. The Samsung also has slightly worse color uniformity but they are both great sets. The Panasonic is the better set overall and has officially replaced the Kuro as the reference tv.
I have a TXP65VT65B. It's that good it's spent the last 6 months covered up in my shed.. I bought a 2nd hand 60in Kuro to replace my old 50in i sold to buy the VT.. The Kuro's are still the best tv's ever made. And the TXP65VT65B was classed as 'reference'.. So how poor are these new 4K LED's.. Not 1 yet has been awarded 'reference' status.
The argument of ZT60 vs KURO is natural but completely academic at this point, both panels are literally “the best” with plusses and minuses with each of them. It’s likely the ZT is technically and visually better because of advancements in technology that it has over the KURO. FYI - For anyone who has a ZT and is experiencing excessive fan noise -Panasonic has issued a free in home fan noise fix, call 1-800-211-PANA (7262) for assistance.
Very sad now that we found the Holy Grail of TVs, Panasonic decides to get out of the plasma business. This happened with the Pioneer Kuro a few years ago. It's deja vu all over again!
2019 OLED are not better than Plasma TV's. I have a Plasma GT25 and my OLED (LG OLED55B7) looks better on still images, only. My Plasma doesn't have Chroma 4:4:4 (1080p Pure Direct, I believe) but I know newer Plasmas like this one has it.
@@mstyle2006 Plasma in PC mode is automatically converted to 4 4 4, you do not need to change anything in the settings of the video card. Full RGB on my LG 50px990 plasma kills details in shadows, and black doesn't make it blacker? That full RGB that limited RGB for plasma does not play any role, it is for LCD. And setting the sharpness and color and all improvements in General in mode 4 4 4 should not be available, if you have everything correctly connected, control in mode 4 4 4 is made from a video card or other device (PS4/PC/Blue Ray player)
@@dirtgarry you are correct. Although now I own a Pioneer Kuro 151FD and I like the fact that in PC mode, you can select the video to full RGB or limted and Choma 4;4;4 or subsampled. I put my ps4 in full RGB and my TV to Full RGB as well. Brightness and Contrast is set to default and no other features are available or needed to be chnged. looks crispand colors pop.
Pioneer was losing money in making the Kuro's. Their business plan was to make money by sales or/and demand alone. When it didn't work they had to close shop. The tech on the Kuro's alone should have made them twice the price. The real Panasonic equal is their professional monitors that are sold at a very hefty price tag. For those who are lucky enough to own one you are the boss. Coming from a former Pioneer employee.
Everything goes through the receiver, why do you need more than 1 or 2 HDMI ports on the tv? People buying this won't be running everything separately.
Only 3 hdmi ? No Problem : If you buy a expensive ZT60 you will have enough room and money to buy a Receiver (With all the HDMI Inputs) and 5.1 Speakers...
It looks incredibly dull. Not to mention it doesn't hold up in the filter department as well as everyone makes out. That is obvious. There isn't even any serious direct light in the room.
Kuro, Kuro, Kuro...I guess I understand sentimentality (I think that's a real word) but it's a moot point (not mute...moot). You cannot buy a new Kuro anymore...they are not part of the current conversation. Cut your mullet, park the t-top convertible, and convert your vinyl over to something your smart phone can play. You can wax eloquent and get misty but the Kuro is not relevant anymore. To quote one of my favorite movies... "It's over Johnny"
...LeBron James... In fact my 500M wasn't brand new itvwas 24hrs old. But my point being it cost me a lot of money, with warranty and transportation. I could have bought a ZT... But i have owned Kuro's before and know how good they are. And i don't care about size because i sit an average of 3-4ft from the 50" KRPM. I wanted the KRP because i wanted the best colour accuracy, contrast, ANSI contrast, deepest blacks, best panel quality by far in the industry. Why i didn't buy the ZT...
LeBron James. Perhaps i should explain something to you. I bought a brand new 500M one month ago with warranty. I bought it because it is the best flat panel plasma display ever built. It is the perfect monitor for doing my colour work at home for my job it it that accurate, sharp and clean. I am not interested in 3D, smart tv - all that shit. If i wanted to i could buy a 3D external processor and some monster 3D glasses for my Oppo 103 (smart 3D blu-ray player ;)and watch real 3D. I could...
Can you tell us the reasons ? I have the 65" vt60 and i would like to know if i found a kuro 600 ahat would be the reasons to sell myu panny to the pio ...
@@andreasd.barkas4845 I have both. The pioneer has perfect uniformity Clean whites darker blacks. No line bleed The picture is cleaner and sharper with no dithering. No phosphate trails. Panasonics not as bright. Line bleed The whites have a pink tint. The overall uniformly is not as good. The picture isn’t as clean more noise on screen and a softer picture than the pioneers. Phosphor trail The pioneer colour is super accurate. Panasonics looks boosted (artificial) the skin tones have too much red in them.
Kuro has 3D, Smart TV, camera, WiFi? Oh no cause Kuro is old outdated and only people living in past can't see that. I guess you are mad still how much you overpaid for your TV that's why you can't move on.
... Banding lines visible on solid colours, crap fake looking motion on film (and) video, terrible light output (31ftl max calibrated) ABL issues, not as color accurate, not as black, PWM noisy blacks, cheap looking bezel, noisy internal fans. I'm not saying it's not a good tv but it is no Pioneer. You do realise if Pioneer was still in the game these stupid exaggerated "comparison" reviews wouldn't be allowed. Nevermind hold any water.
The news in 2013 by Panasonic that they won't be making any more Plasma TVs was and still is probably one of the saddest tech news ever.
absolutly, loving my gt50 now looking for a zt65 as hard parts done, GT50 is harder to find for some ODD reasoning...
@@ReganMarcelis I still have my ZT60 in perfect condition. They're a great TV.
I have a very low hour GT50 and ST60 as well as a F8500 with 11,000 hours which is still very low hour usage. This year I tried to move to OLED, I tried and returned 3 of them. What most people don't realize is when you transition to OLED from plasma you are actually transitioning to a dimmer image on average. This is because HDR has a lower average luminosity than SDR. Watch the same content on your plasma and OLED and it will look substantially brighter on the plasma. This is counterintuitive but true, SDR is much brighter and more lively than HDR. You miss out on the high hit specular highlights but that is only a tiny percentage of HDR content. I can to discover that SDR on high end plasma looks far better than HDR on OLED and this is for a lot of reasons. I am no longer looking to upgrade!
I have the ST60, still going and looking better that any of the newer TVs.
The st60 is actually better than the zt. It has higher peak brightness and less aggressive anti-glare filter so it has more vibrant colors. I'd take your st60 over any OLED.
Vt60 owner in the house....shotts outt to the zt60...were goin miss seeing thatt beautiful body...
So sad that Plasma is dying .. I went with LCD over plasma because it was lighter, brighter, arguably longer lasting, not prone to burn in, uses less power, puts out less heat, etc. etc... Now I feel like I will be forever missing out on that superior picture quality!! Those vibrant and life-like colors, those inky blacks!!!! :' (
***** Is OLED overall better than plasma or is it the most similar to the plasma technology?
Wrong wrong wrong... OLED is the future but not yet.. No they don't have superior colours.. Not yet! The best plasma's are still the best tv's. I'm not biased I own a 60in KURO.. The 65VT65B and owned a LG OLED.. OLED isn't ready yet.
bliglum Plasma haven't had issues with Burn in for years. What you are talking about is ' Image retention" which goes away rather quickly, and the High end models like this Panasonic had technology in it to combat the image retention thing , though it is still susceptible to it though. Everything else is correct though, uses more energy, heavier, half life at 100,000 hours ( which is around 20 years watching it 8 hour a day!!)
All that and Plasma still has far superior picture quality over LCD. I couldn't imaging owning a LCD TV.
tom11zz884 It was the heat that was the killer for me.. As I was looking for a screen to put in my mancave (spare bedroom), and having a large plasma in there acting like a space heater made it a no-go.. Especially because I live in a warm climate.
***** They still havent managed to fix the lagging or drag when the image is moving, and lets face it, in tv and movie images pan and move all the time, so that's a huge downside. Whenever I see TV reviews they always focus on resolution, very rarely on image quality. The resolution hysteria is just ridiculous. Even the best TVs has pixel noise, lag and all sorts of different artifacts like pixel swarms (when pixels looks crushed in sections of the image) and more problems. I just don't get the hype. I mean seriously, if you exclude the high resolution aspect we are better off watching a good CRT monitor! They still use Sonys Trinitron CRT monitors as reference in professional studio environments. I've watched those myself, the very deep 14" reference CRTs are superior in terms of image quality. Cause HD is not enough to create a well balanced pleasant image.
I love my Panasonic VT60 to death and I believe that it's the best television that I have ever laid eyes on. With that said, the Kuro is still an extremely close second. Unless you've actually seen a pro calibrated Kuro, you can't say that it's over. Yes they are as common as a 3 dollar bill, but they are true gems if you do get your hands on one. I'll take a Kuro over any other tv (aside from the VT and ZT) anyday.
After 8 years, this panasonic tv still working after these years?
@@aligueri3563 my ZT is still working. It’s calibrated and still looks more acurate than my oled especially the skin tones and greens. But my 600m kuro is better
Plasma is indeed better than OLED. SDR has a higher average luminosity level than HDR so content on plasma will surprisingly be much brighter than it is on OLED most of the time. Also noble gases ablaze on fire put out a much better quality of light than tiny led light bulbs. Plasma colors are rich warm and lush. OLED color is thin , artificial and hash. They are LCD TVs with perfect blacks. I really can't understand how previous high end plasma owners can be happy with OLED.
This is the only tv that better than my Kuro took few years but now Panasonic leaving Plasma same way Pioneer did .... Damn it!!!
Both the ZT and the VT just equal the black level of the 60" stock 9G Kuros of .001. They do not surpass the 9.5Gs MLL of .0005 stock. However if one were to get a tweaked Kuro, then both the 9Gs and 9.5Gs can go to around .0001 MLL.
2019 edit oled wins inn contrast black levels but I prefer plasma motion and uniformity.
What is the main PQ quality vs vt60 except less reflect of ZT?
The ZT calibrates like a professional graded monitor.
@@pioneer2321 while the vt can't ? the professional menu is almost identical
@@andreasd.barkas4845 nothing to do with the menu. It was the same with the pioneer the 500M monitor calibrated like a professional graded monitor, whilst the 500A didn’t.
@@pioneer2321 the 500m i have red that it had better PQ from 500A at specific parameters it was not only better calibrated ... so ZT has better PQ eg at motion , at flickering , at sharpness at contrast , at colour gamut or proper reproduction ? ... the calibration gives the best from any monitor and i just asked where the Zt is better ....
@@andreasd.barkas4845 to be quite honest the VT and ZT lights off are near identical.
I just bought one to replace the Pioneer Elite PRO-141FD that my shipping company broke. The Panasonic was just delivered today and is still siting in the box. I hope it looks as good as my Pioneer did.
So how is it?
Over all, the Panasonic is a better TV than the Pioneer Elite. The picture quality, I think, is slightly better; the facial colors are more accurate; the black levels are just as good if not better; the TV can be brighter if you are in a bright room and the menus are much better. I am very happy with the TV. However, I wouldn't have replaced the Pioneer Elite if it wasn't broken.
@@carbonunit57 the skin tones on the Panasonics have too much red (even after calibration)
Pioneers is super accurate so when you go to Panasonic it feels like they have a boost in the colour when in reality the pioneer is more accurate.
The whites on Panasonics are not clean or uniform, line bleed is there and the picture isn’t clean like pioneers.
I'd be interested in hearing the 5 reasons why. And I'm not saying that to be smart, but I would sincerely like to know because I never had the chance to sit and actually enjoy a Kuro in person for an extended period of time.
The last few days i have the 65" VT60 and i would like to know which are in reality the differences with the ZT 60 regarding to the better antiglare filter that is something i don't really mind .
In a dark room both side by side, there is no difference.
@@pioneer2321 so even motion difference i red in some reviews is exactly the same ?
@@andreasd.barkas4845 it’s exactly the same. Keep the plasma. Because for all 1080p content you won’t get a better tv. Fantastic motion, accurate colour, great uniformity no banding.
@@pioneer2321 And the huge price difference was all about the better antiglare coating ? Yes the PQ is fantastic but after all these years my 65" model has problem at the whites at the corners , there is a pink tint , and generally uniformity issues even in blacks ... my previous 55" again vt60 was almost perfect .... i will surely keep my 65'' vt60 until it dies
@@pioneer2321 what about KRP vs ZT ? 🤔 ... unfortunately my 65" plasma has a lot of problems and i am thinking of getting extra fans so i can keep the temperature at lower levels because high heating with bad ventilation was caused these problems
It bright. Very bright. TH-cam is low quality not letting you see how magnificent the quality of this TV.
What movie is this on display
this was the ultimate Panasonic Plasma TV. RIP Plasma
Onde eu encontro em Salvador Bahia esse modelo de televisão
Infelizmente esse modelo foi descontinuado faz tempo, e a panasonic nem está mais no Brasil, o unico jeito é esperar aparecer esse modelo no ebay e obviamente conseguir bastante dinheiro pra pagar essa TV!
any models in particular?
You are absolutely right, plasmas have always been superior to lcd and the like when it comes to dark room picture quality. Retailers are being paid to show off the LED models so it's really just marketing wars.
Can u share ur pic settings
The Samsung does have a brighter picture, but it lacks when it comes to deeper blacks. The Samsung also has slightly worse color uniformity but they are both great sets. The Panasonic is the better set overall and has officially replaced the Kuro as the reference tv.
As of August 2024 my VT60 is like new And coupled with my Klipsch fortes it creates the ultimate home theater…
oh god the rarest tv on earth
I order Sammy F8500 and now I see this. Why? Is this gooder then my Sam?
This tv is much better than shitty samsung f8500...
Wish they made a 75-80" version :). I'd pay ~5K easy.
I hope the world doesn't come an end anytime soon..cause im be mad when I get this tv and half to abandon this beauty. ...
I have a TXP65VT65B. It's that good it's spent the last 6 months covered up in my shed.. I bought a 2nd hand 60in Kuro to replace my old 50in i sold to buy the VT.. The Kuro's are still the best tv's ever made. And the TXP65VT65B was classed as 'reference'.. So how poor are these new 4K LED's.. Not 1 yet has been awarded 'reference' status.
cp070476 exactly just bought a pristine 141 fd pioneer
The argument of ZT60 vs KURO is natural but completely academic at this point, both panels are literally “the best” with plusses and minuses with each of them. It’s likely the ZT is technically and visually better because of advancements in technology that it has over the KURO. FYI - For anyone who has a ZT and is experiencing excessive fan noise -Panasonic has issued a free in home fan noise fix, call 1-800-211-PANA (7262) for assistance.
Dream TV!
Very sad now that we found the Holy Grail of TVs, Panasonic decides to get out of the plasma business. This happened with the Pioneer Kuro a few years ago. It's deja vu all over again!
puppyjoe69 We now have Panasonic working on OLED. It'l get there.
2019 OLED are not better than Plasma TV's. I have a Plasma GT25 and my OLED (LG OLED55B7) looks better on still images, only.
My Plasma doesn't have Chroma 4:4:4 (1080p Pure Direct, I believe) but I know newer Plasmas like this one has it.
I like my plasma 4:4:4 on HDMI when labeled as PC. Sharpness down to 15 and RGB full
@@mstyle2006 What Plasma do you have, Man? I didn't see any change on my GT25.
@@Red05x samsung d8500
@@mstyle2006 Plasma in PC mode is automatically converted to 4 4 4, you do not need to change anything in the settings of the video card. Full RGB on my LG 50px990 plasma kills details in shadows, and black doesn't make it blacker? That full RGB that limited RGB for plasma does not play any role, it is for LCD. And setting the sharpness and color and all improvements in General in mode 4 4 4 should not be available, if you have everything correctly connected, control in mode 4 4 4 is made from a video card or other device (PS4/PC/Blue Ray player)
@@dirtgarry you are correct. Although now I own a Pioneer Kuro 151FD and I like the fact that in PC mode, you can select the video to full RGB or limted and Choma 4;4;4 or subsampled.
I put my ps4 in full RGB and my TV to Full RGB as well. Brightness and Contrast is set to default and no other features are available or needed to be chnged. looks crispand colors pop.
Bro reviewing plasma tv after robbing the bank, murder Uncle Ben and fighting Spider-Man. Mad lad.
Pioneer was losing money in making the Kuro's. Their business plan was to make money by sales or/and demand alone. When it didn't work they had to close shop. The tech on the Kuro's alone should have made them twice the price. The real Panasonic equal is their professional monitors that are sold at a very hefty price tag. For those who are lucky enough to own one you are the boss. Coming from a former Pioneer employee.
I think he means lamination, like what Apple does with its screens....
I wish though that they have a thin bezel and borderless design like the new LG LCDs.
Ok thanks
Everything goes through the receiver, why do you need more than 1 or 2 HDMI ports on the tv? People buying this won't be running everything separately.
Nice
Only 3 hdmi ? No Problem : If you buy a expensive ZT60 you will have enough room and money to buy a Receiver (With all the HDMI Inputs) and 5.1 Speakers...
It looks incredibly dull. Not to mention it doesn't hold up in the filter department as well as everyone makes out. That is obvious. There isn't even any serious direct light in the room.
He looks like the child of Steve Jobs and Jack Black.
Do these people even know what there doing?? 0:26 in '65in Panasonic ZT60' It's a 60in!!! Jesus. Can't even get the size correct never mind a review.
Kuro, Kuro, Kuro...I guess I understand sentimentality (I think that's a real word) but it's a moot point (not mute...moot). You cannot buy a new Kuro anymore...they are not part of the current conversation. Cut your mullet, park the t-top convertible, and convert your vinyl over to something your smart phone can play. You can wax eloquent and get misty but the Kuro is not relevant anymore. To quote one of my favorite movies... "It's over Johnny"
...LeBron James... In fact my 500M wasn't brand new itvwas 24hrs old. But my point being it cost me a lot of money, with warranty and transportation. I could have bought a ZT... But i have owned Kuro's before and know how good they are. And i don't care about size because i sit an average of 3-4ft from the 50" KRPM. I wanted the KRP because i wanted the best colour accuracy, contrast, ANSI contrast, deepest blacks, best panel quality by far in the industry. Why i didn't buy the ZT...
LeBron James.
Perhaps i should explain something to you. I bought a brand new 500M one month ago with warranty. I bought it because it is the best flat panel plasma display ever built. It is the perfect monitor for doing my colour work at home for my job it it that accurate, sharp and clean.
I am not interested in 3D, smart tv - all that shit. If i wanted to i could buy a 3D external processor and some monster 3D glasses for my Oppo 103 (smart 3D blu-ray player ;)and watch real 3D. I could...
i want one : )
Uno dei numeri 1
No Sammy best. You wrong. Fan noise to loud on Panny and it costs too much. Boo Panny, Yeah Sammy! :)
Still not as good as a 9G Kuro, i could name at least five reasons why...
Can you tell us the reasons ?
I have the 65" vt60 and i would like to know if i found a kuro 600 ahat would be the reasons to sell myu panny to the pio ...
@@andreasd.barkas4845
I have both.
The pioneer has perfect uniformity
Clean whites darker blacks.
No line bleed
The picture is cleaner and sharper with no dithering.
No phosphate trails.
Panasonics not as bright.
Line bleed
The whites have a pink tint.
The overall uniformly is not as good.
The picture isn’t as clean more noise on screen and a softer picture than the pioneers.
Phosphor trail
The pioneer colour is super accurate.
Panasonics looks boosted (artificial) the skin tones have too much red in them.
@@pioneer2321 are all the TV's calibrated?
@@andreasd.barkas4845 all my tvs are professionally calibrated
@@pioneer2321 perfect. Is the 6090h Kuro as good as the 600 and better than Panasonic vt60
Kuro has 3D, Smart TV, camera, WiFi? Oh no cause Kuro is old outdated and only people living in past can't see that. I guess you are mad still how much you overpaid for your TV that's why you can't move on.
KURO is still top tv,no lcd tv can match colors, plasma will always give better picture over any lcd, even Oled is not better
... Banding lines visible on solid colours, crap fake looking motion on film (and) video, terrible light output (31ftl max calibrated) ABL issues, not as color accurate, not as black, PWM noisy blacks, cheap looking bezel, noisy internal fans. I'm not saying it's not a good tv but it is no Pioneer. You do realise if Pioneer was still in the game these stupid exaggerated "comparison" reviews wouldn't be allowed. Nevermind hold any water.
S Todd I agree