The most user-friendly explanation of ethics theory! I love these short educational videos, the real-life examples make ethics so much more than just theory.
In the first example, the promise to partner with the associate was made with less than full knowledge of that person's character. Withdrawing from the promise may be wise. And there are other cases where unforeseen circumstances necessitate a change. If one promises to join a friend for dinner, but later in the day her child becomes ill, the first obligation is to the child.
100%. As long as the promise is not made knowing that you intended to break it and that you would find it moral/right when others do the same thing regardless if you are on the receiving end or a 3rd party
I disagree with your analogy about the shady businessman. Correct me if I'm off track but I believe you would not have to do business with him. You're not making a personal exception. You wouldn't expect anyone to do business with that man after finding out he is going to scam. And can make deals that you later break as long as you aren't doing that willingly/purposely and as long as you would be okay with everyone being able to back out of similar deals. If he knew the guy was shady and made a deal that he knew he was going to back out of then it would be wrong. Or if he made a deal and that he regrets and wants to backout for purely selfish reasons that would not be okay because I assume most people would not be okay with everyone else backing out of deals for selfish reasons. I think way to many use this idea by applying it to a specific circumstance where an action is not permitted, taking a VERY broad rule from that, then reapplying it to a different specific scenario where it doesn't apply anymore. It's like asking if you should be able to drive home after drinking while out for dinner. If I have two beers and drive home you cant say "That means drinking and driving is okay for everyone." It means that everyone in that situation can drive home. But theres about 100 pre-reqisits to that statement that aren't worth typing out (How many beers, age, height, weight, metabolism, emotional state being fit for driving, driving ability, location, etc)
Deont is a derivative of deon. Deon = duty Deont = duty which is binding (an obligation) Duty is a moral obligation or responsibility so no meaning has been lost.
![“อ.เบียร์ คนตื่นธรรม” มาตามคำเรียกร้อง แหกศาสตร์ฮวงจุ้ย เตือนสติอย่างมงาย | แฉ 7 พ.ย. 67 [1/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5fc4S3xBNfc/mqdefault.jpg)
The most user-friendly explanation of ethics theory! I love these short educational videos, the real-life examples make ethics so much more than just theory.
Online class pa nga
same
hays
Thank you very much, helped a lot, a month's learning explained in three minutes.
literally omg.
In the first example, the promise to partner with the associate was made with less than full knowledge of that person's character. Withdrawing from the promise may be wise. And there are other cases where unforeseen circumstances necessitate a change. If one promises to join a friend for dinner, but later in the day her child becomes ill, the first obligation is to the child.
100%. As long as the promise is not made knowing that you intended to break it and that you would find it moral/right when others do the same thing regardless if you are on the receiving end or a 3rd party
I love ethics deeply emotional and explanation. God bless.
It helps me a lot !!!! thank you so much ❤️
Succinct explanation and adequate examples. Thanks a lot. 🙏
I disagree with your analogy about the shady businessman. Correct me if I'm off track but I believe you would not have to do business with him. You're not making a personal exception. You wouldn't expect anyone to do business with that man after finding out he is going to scam. And can make deals that you later break as long as you aren't doing that willingly/purposely and as long as you would be okay with everyone being able to back out of similar deals. If he knew the guy was shady and made a deal that he knew he was going to back out of then it would be wrong. Or if he made a deal and that he regrets and wants to backout for purely selfish reasons that would not be okay because I assume most people would not be okay with everyone else backing out of deals for selfish reasons.
I think way to many use this idea by applying it to a specific circumstance where an action is not permitted, taking a VERY broad rule from that, then reapplying it to a different specific scenario where it doesn't apply anymore.
It's like asking if you should be able to drive home after drinking while out for dinner. If I have two beers and drive home you cant say "That means drinking and driving is okay for everyone." It means that everyone in that situation can drive home. But theres about 100 pre-reqisits to that statement that aren't worth typing out (How many beers, age, height, weight, metabolism, emotional state being fit for driving, driving ability, location, etc)
Well done 👍🏼 - thank you
wazzup PSBA. ol class pa nga
yes.
Napadaan para sa online class😂🤣.
you are the best
hello po sa psych 3-1 ng lpu laguna
Hii hahhah
this is dope yoooo🙂
Amazing..
When you surname is a swear word in Australia...
This was a really great video though!
Emmanuel Kant believe,
🙌🏼
this guy grounds his axioms
im aizen im a psychopath i will NEVER believe in ethics or morals in my life.
not even if you meet a nice person who shows you love and kindness?
@@lain2075 those aren't real
Hi Power Puff
goodluck
Actually, it comes from "deont-" (obligation).
Deont is a derivative of deon.
Deon = duty
Deont = duty which is binding (an obligation)
Duty is a moral obligation or responsibility so no meaning has been lost.
I still dont get it, what are the rules he is talking about?
rules like don't cheat, don't lie, don't kill, don't steal, don't break a promise
an ethical theory isn't supposed to tell people how to act, just how do we get to know what's right or wrong
Explains my shit marriage
when religion tells the same thing people lose their sh*t