Quanta, Symmetry, and Topology | Frank Wilczek

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @LuciFeric137
    @LuciFeric137 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love Professor Wilczek

  • @peterpalumbo3644
    @peterpalumbo3644 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One theory for that 750 blip that recently showed up at CERN is that it was a selectron. If it is the case it could be the first of the SUSY particles to be discovered. It was not confirmed but what if...

  • @iancmcintyre
    @iancmcintyre 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dr. Wilczek is a really great communicator.

  • @semidemiurge
    @semidemiurge 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dr. Wilczek's response at 1h07m is rather interesting. He seems to be rather convenced that the solution to the Fermi Paradox is the simulation theory.
    I agree.

  • @ccdavis94303
    @ccdavis94303 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting talk esp on non-fragile qbits.

  • @topologicalinsulator
    @topologicalinsulator 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Clear presentation

  • @lilyann168
    @lilyann168 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great lecture

  • @pol...
    @pol... 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice lecture. Supersymmetry really is a beautiful idea. Such a pity that the LHC found no evidence whatsoever :(

  • @CstriderNNS
    @CstriderNNS 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    if a S-electron has zero spin,
    does this mean it all so does NOT have a dipole Magnetic Moment?

    • @ubah1337
      @ubah1337 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      'S' refers to its orbital angular momentum not its *spin* angular momentum

  • @peterpalumbo3644
    @peterpalumbo3644 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    With regards the forces coming together, maybe they come together in a probabilistic range not an exact point? If this were the case you could add gravity and the proposed super force.

  • @peterpalumbo3644
    @peterpalumbo3644 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    One estimate is that quarks will be free from gluons, etc. at 10 to the minus 31 power. Clearly free quarks will go beyond quark confinement. An accelerator for 10 to the -31 is not likely but it would be nice.

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could we have an Arrow of Time for each object? That is represented by quantum mechanics as a process of continuous spherical symmetry forming and breaking. The electron is the most spherical object in the Universe this forms the organization for statistical entropy or disorganization that we have in the second law of thermodynamics. Time is an emergent property forming photon by photon. By the way this is an invitation to see an artist theory of the physics of ‘time’ as a physical process!

    • @DrDeuteron
      @DrDeuteron 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      higgs boson is the most spherical object. Electron's got a n and s pole already. Sphere's don't respect an axis.

  • @3rdrock
    @3rdrock 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Maybe we are the dark matter and the rest of the universe can't see us.

    • @f.jideament
      @f.jideament 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was just thinking like "I can't be much more worthless than this in this reality because people always ignores me" and I saw that comment right after it. It feels like another level of worthlessness, like a huge reality doesn't give a fuck about you and it's real.

    • @Galv140577
      @Galv140577 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The people who invented the idea of "dork matter" did so to try & fill the hole created by their own ignorance of the electric force which shapes the universe. The electric force is 10^38 times stronger than gravity & they think that gravity is the only thing that shapes the universe. The problem is that there isn't enywhere near enough matter to explain the effects they attribute to gravity. The simple explanation is electrical energy. Did you know that there are a billion trillion amps of electrical current flowing between galaxies?

  • @edwardzevecke5705
    @edwardzevecke5705 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Standard model must included gravitation. Standard Model is incomplete. Theoretical Physicist, Elementary Particle Physicist always and must stop until their find gravitation

  • @rer9287
    @rer9287 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the standard model is precise not accurate.

  • @Snorkeldykkeren
    @Snorkeldykkeren 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We like it.....But gotta sleep....!! We like when he tells us that out from just those diagrams you can calculate the rest of mathematics and physics....1!! ..I know this video just didnt pop-up ..We were ment to see this now...Right now....Now we can finally get some sleep,....Went to sleep at 15 minutes....Gonna watch it after we have rested a day...