The plaintiff took waaaay too long to express his dislike for the logo position. I could understand if he was driving the vehicle around and the logo began peeling off or something after a year (if still within warranty). He even stated that he liked the logo. Man, kick rocks! 🙄
i have a feeling that he sued because his idea to get new business by putting his business logo on his car did not bring in new business like he hoped and now he needs money so he came up with the idea to claim that nobody can see the logo and he showed a picture that was purposely altered or taken in such a way as to appear as if his logo could never be seen on his car in order to help his lawsuit .
i have a feeling that he sued because his idea to get new business by putting his business logo on his car did not bring in new business like he hoped and now he needs money so he came up with the idea to claim that nobody can see the logo and he showed a picture that was purposely altered or taken in such a way as to appear as if his logo could never be seen on his car in order to help his lawsuit .
I was in commercial printing for 40+ years and once that proof is signed, game over, period. The law is very specific about this and it's always upheld in court.
Why is anyone talking about the 'position' of the 'man', or the way he leans, when the most dramatic thing is that the 'man' and the logo are in just a black outline, whereas they should be filled-in, in white and the plaintiff idiotically asked for it to be in grey, so this is all on himself...
cheques....autopay only if it's the same amount every month. We're NOT online at our bank because it keeps getting hacked. No autopay if the amount varies....i know a woman who had autopay for her electricity. They would move money into their chequing account for the month, just ahead of when the bills were due....and they had EVERYTHING on autopay. One month the Elec company misplaced the decimal....and instead of around $250, they took $2,500 out of the account...and then charged them a $30 fee because there wasn't enough money IN that account. The woman found out when the bank phoned and said "you'd better get down here fast...something's gone wrong" The bills all came in around the same time, but the hydro came in first....which meant that the bills for the mortgage, cable TV, internet, water, and the rest ALL bounced. And she had to pay a $30-40 fee for each bounced bill, then phone the company and beg to get put back on autopay. The Elec company insisted that they were correct.....for a $50 fee, a meter reader would come out, take the reading and prove it. She paid....and the meter reader found the mistake. The Elec company kindly refunded the $30 for the bounced autopay.....but kept the $50 for the special reading, and wouldn't refund the bounce fees for any of the other bills. It ended up costing the homeowners around $300 to correct the Electric Co's mistake. No autopay in our house!!
As a graphic designer this entire episode hurts to listen to. The logo is different between both cars; maybe the 'guy' could be considered an element of the logo and could be flipped, but honestly the graphic designer who made his logo and did his branding should have done the design for him and sent it to the wrap people so the client would be happy. The judge doesn't know enough about design to have an opinion.
@@goblueinga oh yeah I agree with you, but I was in pain listening to her opinions on the design and saying things like "...the designer should have..." "...anyone who knows about design would know..." etc. No disagreement about the judgement or the fact it's a contract case. I just hate hearing plebs talk about graphic design tbh
@@jeizdolok being in graphic design for 32 years and it also hurt my ears with the lack of knowledgability ... yes he took too long to complain but he was right... he just took too long. i am sure no one else noticed unless it was pointed out to him though
cheques are no longer legal tender in South Africa. Judge Miliano, you will have to move to digital soon,. it is also the easiest way to prove payment of an item... love your show
ok, just looked at the website, there are 2 photos of the car 1 is of the side of the car hes complaining about! the other is the back if you didnt like the image why use it on your website?
This case was pathetic: If this is his LOGO it fails in it's purpose. I thought it was a man /woman? lazing about whilst the company did the moving. Go where? Very dull and not attracting attention at all. Apart from the kerfuffle It failed on all counts.
I knew this case would be an uphill battle for the plantiff due to his english speaking deficiencies right from the very beginning. But the way Milian stood up abruptly while banging her gavel as she exited the courtroom was very disrespectful. She's really something else.
Every single episode you have nothing but negative comments to make about the Judge… why are you here watching if you dislike her so much….? Go watch Judge Judy, you might like her rudeness even better! 😂
Absolutely, you are so correct I agree with you. The plaintikl should have gotten his money back, even if it was 20 years from now. I look forward to seeing yoir amazing words of wisdom
WOW! I was totally on the defendants side but then I read your comment and it made more sense to me because of your words of wisdom. You must be an educated lawyer, I am in awe of your knowledge on these cases. Everyday I grow more wisdom because of you
Absolutely, you are so correct. The amountt of racism from Marilyn makes me wonder if she is a part of the KKK. As usual, your comments are so enlightening because I had trouble understanding the situation. You should be the judge instead, your known experience makes us wonder what Ivy League school you went to.
Dude pays in full, says he likes it, then tries to sue a year later. Is he hitting his head on the floor every time he does a sit up?
He seems to be in need of money, that's the only thing that could make sense
@@David-cc8xe You're probably right, then again we have no idea what is in any supplements he may be taking. 😆
Some people can be such hustlers but it's out of desperation I think.
How well can he be doing if he’s driving a Hyundai
😄👍
The plaintiff took waaaay too long to express his dislike for the logo position. I could understand if he was driving the vehicle around and the logo began peeling off or something after a year (if still within warranty). He even stated that he liked the logo. Man, kick rocks! 🙄
Who else clicks on people’s court every 5 min looking for new episodes😩 #weneedalife🤣
Me! They take way to long to release new episodes. If the show has been on for years but can’t we get more episodes. Lol
Me...lol
Agree
Whoa, plaintiff didn't sound any of the way I expected lol.
What you mean by that…like his Spanish accent cause I already my people I knew already what his voice was going to sound like #🇵🇷
The wrap actually looks very nice I would’ve left a great review
i have a feeling that he sued because his idea to get new business by putting his business logo on his car did not bring in new business like he hoped and now he needs money so he came up with the idea to claim that nobody can see the logo and he showed a picture that was purposely altered or taken in such a way as to appear as if his logo could never be seen on his car in order to help his lawsuit .
Your car looks great! I have no idea why you have waited a year.
When his GF left he asked her why and she said, "I'm tired of driving around in that car"
@ J J you always make me laugh. 😆
@@Kat-bu3bn 💜 JJ ALWAYS MAKES ME LAUGH TOO! 😂
i have a feeling that he sued because his idea to get new business by putting his business logo on his car did not bring in new business like he hoped and now he needs money so he came up with the idea to claim that nobody can see the logo and he showed a picture that was purposely altered or taken in such a way as to appear as if his logo could never be seen on his car in order to help his lawsuit .
I was in commercial printing for 40+ years and once that proof is signed, game over, period. The law is very specific about this and it's always upheld in court.
love it when the gavel comes down and litigants are still flapping their gums. it's a terrifying slaying.
Why is anyone talking about the 'position' of the 'man', or the way he leans, when the most dramatic thing is that the 'man' and the logo are in just a black outline, whereas they should be filled-in, in white and the plaintiff idiotically asked for it to be in grey, so this is all on himself...
Plaintiff has lip fillers???
3:18 woah dude back up off me lol
I was thinking the same thing I almost had to change it haha
Plaintiff could have changed his order earlier rather than later.
This case is bizarre.
Buyer's remorse rears it's ugly head again
It's the case of "You can't wrap". 😆
The plaintiff brought a picture of his car in the dark as proof that you can't see the logo? 👀🤣
That's hilarious. 😂
I really don't understand what the defendant is saying. However, the platiff is rediculous and wrong. The defendant is right. Case closed.
cheques....autopay only if it's the same amount every month. We're NOT online at our bank because it keeps getting hacked. No autopay if the amount varies....i know a woman who had autopay for her electricity. They would move money into their chequing account for the month, just ahead of when the bills were due....and they had EVERYTHING on autopay. One month the Elec company misplaced the decimal....and instead of around $250, they took $2,500 out of the account...and then charged them a $30 fee because there wasn't enough money IN that account. The woman found out when the bank phoned and said "you'd better get down here fast...something's gone wrong" The bills all came in around the same time, but the hydro came in first....which meant that the bills for the mortgage, cable TV, internet, water, and the rest ALL bounced. And she had to pay a $30-40 fee for each bounced bill, then phone the company and beg to get put back on autopay. The Elec company insisted that they were correct.....for a $50 fee, a meter reader would come out, take the reading and prove it. She paid....and the meter reader found the mistake. The Elec company kindly refunded the $30 for the bounced autopay.....but kept the $50 for the special reading, and wouldn't refund the bounce fees for any of the other bills. It ended up costing the homeowners around $300 to correct the Electric Co's mistake. No autopay in our house!!
As a graphic designer this entire episode hurts to listen to. The logo is different between both cars; maybe the 'guy' could be considered an element of the logo and could be flipped, but honestly the graphic designer who made his logo and did his branding should have done the design for him and sent it to the wrap people so the client would be happy. The judge doesn't know enough about design to have an opinion.
she knows he saw it paid for it after he saw it. And it took him a year to complain. This is a contracts case, not a graphic design case
@@goblueinga oh yeah I agree with you, but I was in pain listening to her opinions on the design and saying things like "...the designer should have..." "...anyone who knows about design would know..." etc. No disagreement about the judgement or the fact it's a contract case. I just hate hearing plebs talk about graphic design tbh
I understand what you are saying.
@@jeizdolok being in graphic design for 32 years and it also hurt my ears with the lack of knowledgability ... yes he took too long to complain but he was right... he just took too long. i am sure no one else noticed unless it was pointed out to him though
This is the closest I've been to first, lmao
Bronze 🥉 Congratulations !
Who burped!? Lol
its white font on the first one?
I think the logo on the car looks good.
Jesus, the plaintiff is hard to understand.
It's that a burp at 8:49?
Couldn't have been ANYTHING else haha
Holy wrap
I’m just here 😂
🙋♂️
Is the plaintiff just nervous or is he on something?
I wonder if his gym tanked during covid…..
I just couldn’t stop looking at the plaintiff’s ridiculous lips.
Also though, I thought the logo looked perfectly fine in both directions.
He just sued for more publicity
cheques are no longer legal tender in South Africa. Judge Miliano, you will have to move to digital soon,. it is also the easiest way to prove payment of an item... love your show
Judge PMSing?
i bet he just wants money
maybe the business is failing
ok, just looked at the website, there are 2 photos of the car
1 is of the side of the car hes complaining about!
the other is the back
if you didnt like the image why use it on your website?
Me too lol
2nd.. happy Wednesday
Thank You 😊 - Silver 🥈 For second !
Dammit I thought it was taco Tuesday🤔
@@misseazar4250 It is Taco Tuesday 🤣
My guess is the OP might be in Australia 🇦🇺 or New Zealand 🇳🇿 where it's Wednesday .. 🤔
the defendant is kinda cute in a stupid ass way.
night 90
This case was pathetic: If this is his LOGO it fails in it's purpose. I thought it was a man /woman? lazing about whilst the company did the moving. Go where? Very dull and not attracting attention at all. Apart from the kerfuffle It failed on all counts.
The Plaintiff's business is likely not doing well and he just wants some money back. The logo looked fine and the Plaintiff is being very insincere.
First
Busy boy 17
кайфаааввввввввввввввввв
I knew this case would be an uphill battle for the plantiff due to his english speaking deficiencies right from the very beginning. But the way Milian stood up abruptly while banging her gavel as she exited the courtroom was very disrespectful. She's really something else.
Every single episode you have nothing but negative comments to make about the Judge… why are you here watching if you dislike her so much….? Go watch Judge Judy, you might like her rudeness even better! 😂
Absolutely, you are so correct I agree with you. The plaintikl should have gotten his money back, even if it was 20 years from now. I look forward to seeing yoir amazing words of wisdom
WOW! I was totally on the defendants side but then I read your comment and it made more sense to me because of your words of wisdom. You must be an educated lawyer, I am in awe of your knowledge on these cases. Everyday I grow more wisdom because of you
Absolutely, you are so correct. The amountt of racism from Marilyn makes me wonder if she is a part of the KKK. As usual, your comments are so enlightening because I had trouble understanding the situation. You should be the judge instead, your known experience makes us wonder what Ivy League school you went to.
As usual, you are so correct. Amazing words of wisdom