I tried to start a respectful discussion backed up by historical references which can all be found on ENGLISH SITES. non of my materials came from Chinese references. i even read all my references ALOUD in the video, and if you watched the video, you will realize that my main arguing points came from books written by Korean authors. and yet it seems that a large portion of the comment section didn't even watch the video before making a comment. swearing, spamming, attacking me personally, attacking other nations and calling names will not make you right. it will only make you look more ignorant
(btw, i can see the average watch time of this video in the content creator page. and guess how long that is? only 2 minutes. 2 minutes into this video i haven't even gotten to the main argument yet. so unless you watched the full video, pls think again before commenting)
I am Japanese. Japanese textbooks say that Japanese culture, including kimono and Zen, evolved from ancient Chinese culture. Japan respected the culture of Tang and Song and achieved its own development to become Japanese culture. 私は日本人です。日本の教科書には、着物や禅をはじめとする日本の文化は、古代中国の文化から発展したものであると書かれています。日本は唐や宋の文化を尊敬し、独自の発達を遂げて日本文化になったのです。
张昱《张光弼诗集》卷三《宫中词》： 宫衣新尚高丽样，方领过腰半臂载，连夜内家争借看，为曾着过御前来。" "궁중에서 새롭게 유행하는 것은 고려양이라네 방령에 짧은 허리, 반소매 궁중 여인들이 밤까지 이어져 구경하려 하네 이는 고려 여인이 황제 앞에 이 옷을 입고왔기 때문이라네" Translation: The new trend in the palace is Goryeo Style. Short-waist, short-sleeved court women in Bangryeong continue to watch until night. The Short-waist, short-sleeved clothes has nothing to do with Ming dynasty Hanfu, another evidence that Hanbok was influenced by Hanfu, because in Yuan dynasty Korean still wear Short-waist, short-sleeved clothes. [숙원잡기]《菽园杂记》：：“马尾裙始于朝鲜国，流入京师……于是无贵无贱，服者日盛。至成化末年，朝臣多服之者矣。阁老万公安冬夏不脱……。大臣不服者惟黎吏侍淳一人而已。此服妖也，弘治初始有禁例。” "마미군은 조선국(고려)에서 시작되어, 수도로 유입됬으며......귀천을 가리지 않고 복식이 날로 성했다. 성화말년에 이르러, 조정 신하들도 많이 입게 되었다. 각로 모두 공, 사, 겨울에도 여름에도 벗지 않았다.....이 복식은 요사하므로, 홍치 초시에 금지되었다." Translation: Woven horsetails skirt started in Chosun (Korea) and flowed into the capital... By the end of the torch, many court officials were also wearing them. All of the corners were not taken off in the winter or in the summer. In Ming dynasty, we wear马面裙 has no inner skirt, which is not puffy. 马尾裙, which is inner skirt that make outsider skirt puffy, we do not wear that in Ming dynasty. Even we wear inner skirt, it is not made of Woven horsetails and has nothing to do with korea. [만포필기], 《寓圃笔记》:"发裙之制，以马尾编成，系于衬衣之内。体肥者一裙，瘦削者或二三，使外衣之张，俨若一伞。", "치마를 넓히는 제도는, 말꼬리를 옷안에 엮어서 만든다. 몸을 비대하게 만든 하나의 치마로, 마른사람은 혹 두개 세개를 입는다, 옷을 바깥으로 넓게 퍼지게 만드는데 쓰는데, 우산과 같다."고 기록하고 있습니다. Translation: The system for widening the skirt is made by woven horsetails into clothes. It is a skirt that makes the body enlarged, and the skinny person wears two or three lumps, and it is used to spread the clothes widely outside, and it is like an umbrella." Are you kinding me, Hanfu in Ming dynasty do not use horsetails panty to enlarge the body, what we wear is 马面裙，not 马尾裙，马尾裙 made of woven horsetails is a kind of inner skirt. That is all 高丽 clothes mentioned in these material, after translation, we can see that it has nothing to do with Ming dynasty clothes. In turn, it proves that hanbok in Joseon Dynasty was heavily influenced by China because it is totally different from Goryeo style.
I think china people have inferioty complex about Korean culture. I definitely like korean drama and their attitude. I used to live China and Korea both. But China people have very rude attitude over other country people. Also Korea is more clean and people are very nice
나르시스트ZH 김치국 김치어 특유의 치치치치치 짜 짜 짜 짜 짜 습니다습니다습니다가장시끄럽네🐸🐸🐸🥬🥬💩💩💩🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮kimchi國 kimchi pop kimchi語kimchi man最惡🤮 dog of USA all culture copy from China Japan or USA 中國附屬國 漢字 秋夕 儒家文化 傳統建築 筷子🥢 本草綱目 中醫藥 飲食文化 漢字專用語 韓服 端午節 日曜日 12節氣 風水 太極旗🇰🇷（copy from 中國太極圖）等等等等⋯⋯⋯all copy from China
KoSungJin 김치국 김치어 특유의 치치치치치 짜 짜 짜 짜 짜 습니다습니다습니다가장시끄럽네🐸🐸🐸🥬🥬💩💩💩🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮kimchi國 kimchi pop kimchi語kimchi man最惡🤮 dog of USA all culture copy from China Japan or USA 中國附屬國 漢字 秋夕 儒家文化 傳統建築 筷子🥢 本草綱目 中醫藥 飲食文化 漢字專用語 韓服 端午節 日曜日 12節氣 風水 太極旗🇰🇷（copy from 中國太極圖）等等等等⋯⋯⋯all copy from China
Fun fact: In China, people on Internet are getting used to use the country flag of korea to represent the verb "steal", for example: what a interesting meme, let me 【🇰🇷】it
Hanfu influenced hanbok from early time, since Tang, Song, Ming Dynasty Costumes of Ming Dynasty influenced Korea / was awarded to Korea, which was a vassal region under Ming Dynasty. The emperor of Ming welcomed Korean officials to visit Ming palace and learn Ming systems of all kinds, including Chinese characters, political system and costumes. The emperor of Ming awarded costumes to Korea, and Korea took it as a honor, applying all kind of Ming systems to Korea. A king of Korea said: ‘Korea is the good son while Japan is the evil son’, which was recorded in an ancient book. This is the vassal relationship, which is why Ming Dynasty protected Korea from being invaded by Japanese. If you want to see the true history, it’s all written in ancient books and antiques in the historical museums of all kinds. Even Korean ancient books are in Chinese. Korean people cannot see the true history without learning Chinese.
@@Littlewatermelon_Melons ?? It’s doesn’t make sense My question is Does Hanbok represent democracy? My Chinese friend was afraid of talking about Hanbok..
In every video about China and Japan, you will see Koreans in the comment section spreading hate and claiming cultures from these 2 countries. Ironically, Korea was ruled by both so it's obvious who's the liar.
both hanbok and kimchi are copy of chinese hanfu and paocai, there are history record to prove this, pretty much everything in korea is copy from china
I met two Korean people in the Chinese restaurant in Japan. The restaurant was very small. They began to smoke and put their feet on the chair. They had no quality at all. I was also charged double for Korean food. The most important thing is that he served only one dish, and it was not finished.
To insult other countries with human suffering only makes you inhuman. Don't forget that your country was also a victim of war, and that fascist atrocities were also perpetrated in your country
Respect for clothing and culture is as important as respect for one's own history. It is an indisputable fact that China, as one of the four ancient civilizations, has a profound cultural accumulation. There is no need for us to steal other cultures because we have strong cultural confidence, and I hope you have the same in front of the screen.
@JENNYLEEWORLD I don't know where you got that information! But what is the record of Korean history? Are there written records dating back more than 3,000 years? Chinese characters have a trend of development, from oracle to han Dynasty small seal script, evolution to the back of large seal script, regular script and so on! Korea has been enslaved by different countries throughout its history! How do you develop your own civilization?
@JENNYLEEWORLD Koreans seem to like making up shyt to support their perspectives. There are no archaeological or written records to support your opinion.
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
@Seong O Shim In fact, we have been already modest. I don't think we are the center of the world,even though many countries are concerned. It's you who keep claiming that the Mid-Autumn Festival, hanfu,Qu Yuan and so on are your Korean.That's ridiculous.Since your history is shorter than ours, why not trace it to its source with a heart of learning?We never care what other countries get from us. Our only request is to respect history. Why close yourself off in your own world instead of listening to the history and world of others?But the Internet is grumpy. I don't ask you to understand my thoughts. Just stop trying to quibble with me. I don't have time for pointless conversations with you here. If you want to know the history, look it up. Keep pleasing yourself if you don't want to face it. It's simple.话说我都没发现我的赞这么多了。明明只是想来支持一下十音而已。超级不喜欢回复星人有点懵逼。明明只想安安静静地看视频发评论结果就被对线了。0.0
@Seong O Shim No Chinese said that! We did say we are arising but we are creating happiness by our own hands and have no intention to rob from others. Stop believing these lies which demonize Chinese for their own profits.
When people think about great, ancient civilizations they don't think about Korea. They think about China, Egypt, Maya, Greece, Rome. It's an insult to compare China and Korea in the same sentence.
We K people don’t care about how the world people think about K for ancient civilization. *We are interested in what the world thinks of us today.* The reason why it is important for us to make efforts to reveal the truth about ancient history is not to brag to the world, but to enable ourselves and East Asians to know their roots. In other worlds, efforts to understand ancient history correctly without distortion are for ourselves and East Asian people, not for the rest of the world.
C and J people are too much care about how the world see and think of them. Your comment also reflects that. C people look at everything (including culture and ancient history) from the perspective of profit and loss (利害得失). The reason C people extremely dislike K culture becoming world-famous is because they think it is a loss for them.
In my observation, among East Asians, only K people can study ancient history objectively based on facts without distortion, and can accept newly discovered ancient historical facts without hesitation even if they are against our national interests. C and J can never accept the new fact if it is against their national interests. This is because C people act based on profit and loss (得失), J people act based on harmony (服從, 和) within the established hierarchy, but K people value justice (義). That’s why C people cannot bear 不益 while K people cannot bear 不義. When it comes to ancient history also, C can never bear 不益. J people also can never say or accept the newly discovered truth if it is against their established national belief because 和(harmony) is more important than the truth for J people.
Ultimately, 天 blesses those who pursue justice and truth. According to [三國遺事], the founding ideology of Gojoseon was 弘益人間 which means *“widely benefit the human world”.* What a beautiful and philanthropic founding ideology suitable for the 21st century. All East Asians were born from K people, which means K people are their biological parents. *Everything is to be done as it is said: K people are parents and exist to widely benefit the human world.* That’s why getting closer to K and befriending K people bring blessings.
韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。 한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요
@@김준면개사랑함뒤질거 韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。 한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요
@@이선영-v4s6x Chinese hanfu history is all true based on real artefacts and books wrote in the past by ancient people. So there is nothing for us to lie right?
@@다좡이 can't say that also. Both countries have their history. I am also planning to go Korea when Covid gets better to learn more about their history since many people now just mix China and Korea together and I don really like that
@@nyunimoo2428 굳이 있냐고 물으면 환빠들이 그런 주장을 하긴 했지만 지금은 사실상 보기 어렵고, 시작은 넷우익들이 우스갯소리로 하던걸 몇몇 놈들이 번역해서 지랄했을 뿐, 저분들 머릿속엔 한국인이 공자도 한국인이다 이지랄 하는걸로 세뇌교육 받았을텐데 뭐...
Koreans hope China can make freedom for Taiwan, Mongolians, Tibetan, Hongkong, Joseon tribes for respect their owned history and culture peace of world
@@666Yourkarma As a vassal state of China and Japan in history, Korean should make themselves free from USA nowadays. As for the hope about Taiwan, Tibetan..., you could fignt and win a total war against China then your dream will come true. You delusional clown. XD
@@666Yourkarma I speak English because Eng is international language. But Korean use Chinese in histroy because Korean is one of China's vassal state and Korean have no their own language before 15 century.
@@nokoxia6413 Korea spoke Chinese because Chinese was international language. But Chinese use English in History because China is one of the vassal states united 56 tribes. And Korean have owned language what was Mandarin. we created Korean 700years ago biologically because Mandarin was hieroglyphics uncomfortably because many primitive people created and mixed too many ways by too many ancient people
한국은 민주화 운동 때마다 한복을 입었습니다. 즉, 한복은 민주화 운동의 상징입니다. 당신은 중국의 민주화를 원하고 있군요. BTS도 한복이 한국의 전통의상이라며 뮤직비디오를 촬영했습니다. 당신은 BTS의 팬들을 무시하고 있군요. Korea wore Hanbok for every pro-democracy movement. Hanbok is a symbol of democratic movements. You want China to be democratized. BTS also filmed the music video, saying Hanbok is a traditional Korean costume. You're ignoring BTS fans.
china should ban import from korea. and let them know who's their real dad 首尔大学 一篇题目为고려(高丽) 국왕(国王)과 관리(官吏)의 복식(服飾)이 반영(反应)하는 국가(国家) 위상(位相)과 자의식(自意识)의 변동(变动)的论文提到了这段文字 且翻译成韩文: "조선에서 관복 제도의 격을 명의 제도에 비해 2단계 낮춘 것은 1370년에 명에 서 고려의 관리에게 사여한 제복 규정에 근거한 것이다. 당시 명에서는 중국의 9등(九等) 관제에 견주어 두 등급을 낮추어 사여하였다.50)50)그리고 20여년 뒤 조선에서는 이에 근거하여 관리의 공복 제도를 정하였다. 이와 같은 원리는 이후에 성립한 복식 제도에도 적용되었다. 제복 제도 역시 명에서 고려를 2등급 체강하여 왕국 7등으로 규정한 사례에 근거하여 제정되었다.
@@minus21334 한글은 잘쓰면서 왜 검색을 할줄 모르세요? 아니면 그정도로 페쇠적인가? 넉흭낙락는 정말 믹폑국익약~~ 해석해봐~~ 한글 열심히 배운거 아니야? History needs to be straightened out. Hanbok is a symbol of national independence, freedom, democracy, and democracy. (역사는 똑바로 알아야 합니다. 한복은 민족독립자유민주주의민주주의 상징입니다. ) I support China's democracy. Fighting!! (중국의 민주주의를 응원합니다. 파이팅!!)
Everyone know that chinese cultures spread globaly...i'm from indonesia no doubt might be immigrant from ancient china bring hanfu influent to korean clothing...korean netizen must googling their history because they are not that long comparing china history....
There are so many this kind of rhetoric here such as "I'm Vietnamese and we admit great C influence, I'm Japanese and we admit great C influence... Try to search Goguryeo murals and see Hanbok there. Just as Xianbei, Mongols, Manchus had their own cultures and clothing styles even though they were geographically closer to China, and they culturally influenced China a lot, Koreans also had their own cultures and clothing styles since very ancient times (far before AD). Chinese mainly started to influence the neighboring regions far later since Tang/Song periods.
@@random_guy1084 Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷： AD 1897 “我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可" “우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다” 2.2 History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392 “復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服” “병오 다시 홍무(洪武) 연호를 시행하였고, 명(明)의 의관을 이어 사용하였으며, 호복(胡服)을 금지하였다.”(朝鲜现代语翻译） 3. Taejo of Goryeos' Ten Rules 왕이 훈요10조를 내리다 高麗太祖 訓要十條: AD 943 "惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉" “우리 동방(東方)은 옛날부터 중국의 풍속[唐風]을 흠모하여 문물(文物)과 예악(禮樂)이 다 그 제도를 따랐으나, 지역이 다르고 인성(人性)도 각기 다르므로 꼭 같게 할 필요는 없다. 거란(契丹)은 짐승과 같은 나라로 풍속이 같지 않고 말도 다르니 의관제도(衣冠制度)를 삼가 본받지 말라” 5.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀) : AD 648 “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製” “춘추가 또한 장복(章服)을 고쳐서 중국의 제도에 따를 것을 청하자” 4.Samguk Sagi Volumn 5『삼국사기』권5 『三國史記』卷5 : AD 649 “(真德王) 三年,春正月，始服中朝衣冠” “(진덕왕) 3년(649) 봄 정월에 비로소 중국의 의관(衣冠)을 착용하였다”
I saw a comment on a Hanfu video claiming that they're copying the Hanbok. I thought of writing a history lesson, but decided to just dislike the comment instead. As a Scandinavian, the three countries all have similar cultures, languages and traditions, but no one would claim that one of us is the original. There were Vikings in Norway, Denmark and Sweden. They were all distinct and separate from each other. When you think of a Viking you think of raids and wariors and not traders and explorers, which majority were. Norwegians and Danes were the raiding types, but only during dire need. Swedish vikings explored and traded and established what is now Russia. That is a historic fact. Russians on the other hand denies vikings ever being in Russia. China has been a thriving culture thousands of years before the Kingdom of Korea was established. Sure, there lived people on the peninsula, but they had no influense over a well estabished culture such as China was at that time. Being influensed by your neighbours is perfectly fine. After all, it's them you have the closest bond with. Cultural exchange is vitally important still today. We give and take from each other and expand our cultures to become better. Chinese and Korean cultures, clothes and languages blended over thousands of years. But that doesn't mean that one is owned by the other or that one is a copy of the other. It's same same, but different. Just like Scandinavian nations are very similar in most ways, we're still distinctly different, have our own history and culture apart from the others. It just saddens me that people, in this day of unlimted access to information, still make baseless claims because of their feelings and beliefs. Just because you believe it to be true, doesn't make it fact. But that is, unfortunately, the human condition.
I am studying abroad at Copenhagen University now. Viking culture is fascinating. Before coming to Scandinavia, I could never imagine that I had such a big misunderstanding (or basically ignorance) about Viking civilization. I am now interested in these cultural histories and would love to share my own Chinese culture, or the culture of any of my East Asian neighbors. I have a Japanese flatmate and three European flatmates, and we get along very well.
韩国历史是用汉字记载的，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法的原件是用汉字写的，明明就是中国的文化属国。😅说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。 한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。😅아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요
@@albertwong5031 你的知识是在哪里学的。한국은 중국의 속국이 아닙니다. 한글이 만들어지기 전에는 한자를 사용하기는 하였지만 엄연히 중국과 표기법이 달랐습니다. 제대로 된 상식을 가지고 이야기를 해주었으면 좋겠습니다. 그리고 오랜 세월 동안 한복과 김치는 한국의 전통 문화로 인정 받아 왔습니다. 단 한번도 전 세계인들에게 중국의 것이라고 인정 받은적이 없죠. 실제로도 중국의 것이 아니고요. 왜 갑자기 한복과 김치를 중국의 것이라고 우기는지 이해가 되지 않습니다. 당신들의 후세대들이 잘못된 역사 의식을 가지지 않도록 지금부터라도 제대로 된 역사를 알려주길 바랍니다.
Its very stupid for China to say hanbok and kimchi are Chinese all of sudden in 2020 while China had their mouth shut for past centuries. 🤣🤣 Maybe they got jealous cuz of K culture and K Pop being famous
@@padeng555 古代模仿中国 现代照搬欧美, 这可能就是你们的南韩传统吧 Ancient imitation of China modern copy of Europe and the United States, this may be your South Korean tradition
What's scary is that there are many Chinese who support Korea and Koreans on the matter. Mainly because they are fans of K-pop, K-dramas, or they are dating/married to Koreans.
I said I wanted a logical discussion in this video, so I don't have any expectations, but I'll give it a try. In other Chinese videos, they just deleted my comment. First, it is influenced but interactive. Hanbok and Hanfu have different roots. Hanbok is based on the clothing of the northern equestrian people, and Hanfu is based on the clothing of the southern settled people. Accordingly, China's Hanfu was also a form in which men also wore skirts in the ancient era, but in the 3rd century BC, under the influence of Hufu, they began to wear pants. There is a record in the Jaji Tonggam that while King Jo Muryeong was enforcing the ban on wearing trousers, Chinese society vehemently rejected it, calling it barbarian culture. Additionally, due to frequent exchanges with Joseon during the Ming Dynasty, similar cultures often appear. To conclude, the Ming Dynasty clothing that is suggested to be similar to Hanbok, which China claims to be an imitation of Hanbok, is Goryeo style brought over from Goryeo. The Hanfu of the Yuan Ming Dynasty was greatly influenced by the Hanbok from the late Goryeo Dynasty to the early Joseon Dynasty due to the influence of the Goryeo style that was popular during the Yuan Dynasty, and Chinese historical materials such as Sokjachi Tonggam also record that Chinese clothing during that period was influenced by the Goryeo style. In other words, it is not that Hanfu from the Ming Dynasty came over and became Hanbok, but rather, Hanbok came over and changed Hanfu into the way it was during the Ming Dynasty. In addition, Danryeong, which was given and maintained by the Ming imperial family, is a costume that originated in the West and spread through China. Of course, a lot of Chinese culture and clothing were imported to the Korean Peninsula, and Tang Dynasty clothing was adopted as royal clothing by most countries in East Asia. Han Chineseists ignore the history of the introduction of Goryeo style clothes and claim that Goryeo style hanfu is an independent Han clothing, was influenced by the Tang Dynasty, or that Ming Dynasty Hanfu influenced Hanbok. However, according to common sense, if Koryo-style hanfu was the unique cultural attire of the Han people, there was no reason for the Ming royal family to ban it by edict, saying, "This is not a Chinese custom." Also, influence is overinterpreted. Just because a country has been influenced by it, the clothing and culture of that country cannot all become imitations. The fact that ancient Japan's clothing was so strongly influenced by Baekje's clothing that it was worn directly from Baekje is also described in a number of Japanese records, such as Nihon Shoki and Shangfu Ryuki. However, that does not mean that kimono is collectively called hanbok. In other words, culture is not imperialism that takes over each country. Cultures are transmitted, merge, or coexist. In a similar case, Neo-Confucianism was strongly influenced by Buddhism in India and Nepal. However, it is the same as saying that Neo-Confucianism is the Buddhist ideology of India and Nepal. Second, the traditional clothing of the Korean people does not represent the entire hanbok. Based on the Korean-Chinese hanbok, it can be said that the Korean-Chinese hanbok exists in Chinese traditional clothing. However, it is incorrect to interpret the Hanbok of the Korean people as one of Chinese costumes. In the past, China used the ethnic Koreans to carry out the Northeast Project to intentionally deny the history of Goguryeo and Balhae, that is, Korean history, and reduce them to a minority in China. Of course, it is not currently underway, but the problem is that in the private sector, Chinese people still cite studies from the Northeast Project and provide incorrect information to foreign sites and foreigners. In this situation, Hanbok is shown to foreigners and, without any further explanation, they say, “Because there are Korean-Chinese people, it is a traditional Chinese costume.” If so, even in the private sector in Korea, it is inevitable to receive fierce criticism, such as "China's influence and subcategories are often emphasized without any historical context." In order for China to call the Korean-Chinese and Hanbok traditional clothing, it must recognize Hanbok as Korea's unique clothing. Korea is a different country from China, Hanbok is Korea's unique traditional costume inherited from northern nomadic peoples, and the Hanbok worn by Korean-Chinese people is also a traditional costume derived from Korea's Hanbok. This must be explained in advance to avoid 'misunderstandings'. In conclusion, although it is true that China has had a great influence on East Asia, it is only at the level of “influence.” The influence of western regions such as the Hobok of the northern nomadic tribes, Korea's Goryeo Yang, and Central Asia and India on China cannot be ignored. Claiming that another country's culture is one's own based on cross-cultural influence is simply a claim that causes discomfort in the country in question. This is also true in other cultures. In the case of European traditional clothing, after the fall of Western Rome, Gothic clothing was popular, and then through Southern Europe and France, at one time even Turkish and Persian clothing were popular, and now they are wearing suits originating from England, and these past clothing are their own unique style. I do not claim that it is the culture and clothing of . By this logic, Chinese culture was also influenced by Korea, so it would be meaningless to argue that Chinese culture is a part of Korean culture. Incidentally, Hanfu is a traditional Chinese clothing. However, the modern Hanfu popular in China is not traditional Chinese clothing. The reason is simple. In fact, Hanfu was fused with the clothing of the Manchu people, and has been passed down to modern times under the name of cheongsam. The Chinese claim that the cheongsam is the clothing of the Manchu people, and that the original Chinese clothing was hanfu. This is no different from cultural imperialism. Culture does not move towards an imperialistic form as the Chinese claim. They fuse together and develop in a better direction. Hanbok developed into its modern form through exchanges with various cultures, including Hanfu and Kimono. Even if we study Goguryeo clothing now and wear it again, it is bound to be reinterpreted in a new form. This is because we do not even know how people wore clothes during the Goguryeo period. In other words, you are wearing a newly created costume rather than a traditional costume. It is correct to see Hanfu as a reinterpretation of the Hanfu wearing movement that is popular in modern China. I don't even know how to wear Hanfu, so isn't it inevitable that it will have to be reinterpreted? It even looks different from the Hanfu of the past. To be exact, it is closer to Hanbok. If you deny the entire cheongsam, the unique beauty of hanfu mixed in it will also disappear, and then people will try to take a part of it from hanbok that looks similar. Then it has no choice but to resemble hanbok. Considering that China's Hanfu wearing movement also took place after the popularity of K-pop and Korean dramas, we can see that Hanfu = Hanbok was an unreasonable claim due to China's cultural inferiority complex. In other words, the reality of Hanfu is a fake that is completely different from the Hanfu of the past, and is a newly created costume in modern times. Just because the name is borrowed from tradition does not mean it is a traditional costume. In other words, Hanbok can be listed as a UNESCO cultural heritage, but Hanfu cannot. China needs to love its traditional culture. Cheongsam is a unique Chinese traditional culture that was passed down through the fusion of Manchurian clothing and Hanfu during the Qing Dynasty. Now, denying the cheongsam and insisting on Hanfu is in fact denying their own history of the Qing Dynasty and Hanfu, and in conclusion, they cannot help but fall into the same contradiction as denying the entire history of China. Considering these circumstances, it is highly likely that China's cultural misunderstandings and misconceptions will strengthen its negative influence on Korea. In reality, it is only worsening the feelings of each country, and China's external image is worsening. On the contrary, in the process of fighting like this, Hanbok becomes more famous. Lastly, it occurred to me, but I hope that no one appears who says, ‘Both cheongsam and hanfu are Chinese.’ As explained above, Hanfu cannot be revived in modern times. Hanfu already exists under the name of cheongsam, so how can it be revived? It is impossible to resurrect a living person. This kind of behavior is no different from a child throwing a tantrum and claiming that everything is his or hers. Simply put, that is cultural imperialism. In the past, there was a saying like this in Joseon. “The territory is too large to be called a small country, and the mind is too narrow to be called a great country, so it is called China.” It's natural, but it's extremely wrong to say and do, and I really hate this. So don't let me get to the horrible reality that these words were true. I want to like China.
한푸가 한복을 따라해 만든거란다. 한복이 너희꺼라는 고증을 통해 진정 너희것인지 확인해 보는게 좋겠다만 뭐가 있어야 증명이라도 할텐데 없는걸로 증명이 되겠니. 거기다 너희는 너희의 역사마저 부정하는 안타까운 민족이라 마음이 아프다. 우리 대한민국의 한복을 좀 설명하자면 우리의 한이 들어있는 의복이지. 아주 고대부터 백성의 민주 의지가 담긴 옷이란다. 근래에는 3.1운동으로 일본에 독립을 이뤄내었던 그 순간에도 한복은 함께 였단다. 한복은 한민족의 민주화를 상징하는 전통적이고 역사적인 옷이다. 한복은 자유의지가 한으로 녹여든 진정한 민주의지가 각인된 옷이다. 너희는 이것을 본받고자 한것이라고 생각한다. 한복을 통한 너희의 민주화를 응원한다.
@@lucileliu2099 I'm sorry, but that's not the case. HANBOK IS KOREA'S OWN TRADITIONAL COSTUME. We wore hanbok even when we were in Goguryeo. Isn't the culture of your country influenced by South Korea if you fix it by being influenced by the culture of neighboring countries? Not only you but South Korea has a very old history. In the history of the democratization movement, Hanbok was with us. Hanbok has been with us for a long time. Don't distort history.
@못생김이자글자글 Hanfu is not Hanbok Based on the quotes from Korean Kings and authoritative historical documents. Korea Hanbok is the one that was influenced by China Hanfu, not the other way around. Claiming Hanfu's characteristics and styles belong to Hanbok only shows your ignorance. Hanbok shares similarities with Hanfu because ancient Korea adopted Chinese costumes and headgears. You can use them, but you don't have the right to distort history or claim these Hanfu features as Korean origin. Hanfu is for everyone, but Hanfu is Chinese 1.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀) : AD 648 “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製” “춘추가 또한 장복(章服)을 고쳐서 중국의 제도에 따를 것을 청하자” " Gim Chunchu 무열왕 asked the Emperor of Tang for permission to change the traditional cloth of Silla, the country shall follow the Chinese style " 2. History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392 “復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服” “부행홍무년호 습대명의복 금호복” “Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress” 3.Samguk Sagi Volumn 5『삼국사기』권5 『三國史記』卷5 : AD 649 “(真德王) 三年,春正月，始服中朝衣冠” “(진덕왕) 3년(649) 봄 정월에 비로소 중국의 의관(衣冠)을 착용하였다” " In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese-style cloth and hats" 4.Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷 “我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可" “우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다” “The territories of Korea used to be ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture - Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗” 5. Taejo of Goryeos' Ten Rules 왕이 훈요10조를 내리다 高麗太祖 訓要十條 "惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉" “우리 동방(東方)은 옛날부터 중국의 풍속[唐風]을 흠모하여 문물(文物)과 예악(禮樂)이 다 그 제도를 따랐으나, 지역이 다르고 인성(人性)도 각기 다르므로 꼭 같게 할 필요는 없다. 거란(契丹)은 짐승과 같은 나라로 풍속이 같지 않고 말도 다르니 의관제도(衣冠制度)를 삼가 본받지 말라” "We, the East admire the customs of the Tang Dynasty, learn her rite and music, adopt her system and style. People from far land are different from us in terms of humanity, do not try to make them look similar in a subservient manner. The nature of Khitan (契丹) is brutal and bestial, we do not share the same value or language with them, so do not follow their system of attire"
[Warning] Those who bypass the Golden Shield and watch TH-cam will be prosecuted and punished by Chinese authorities. Remember, it is illegal to watch American sites.
we in Mexico have the same problem, central and south America are claiming our culinary art as theirs to the point that even well, I cannot say names but some of them are now requesting to be recognized in UNESCO for their culinary art when all they did was copying ours. so do not fall into the same mistake as we did, fight for your culture, fight for your rights!!!! now they have a campaign that claims that if the UNESCO do not accept their claims they will label them as racists...ensuring their success..
they know they have nothing so they try to steal, China has thousands of years of history, they are only tricking themselves with revisionist history, no one but Koreans believe a word of what they're saying, even Japan, Vietnam, etc. admit that a lot of things came from ancient China
@@XZXZXZXZ-k6f Destroied what？You'd better be careful that one day the North Korea destroy you.They have nuclear bombs😄But the only thing that can explode in your country is Samsung Note7😆
@@snowyy.5275 what i said was sarcasm, they do have history class, but they teach children based on "history" that are not confirmed to be true, most of them are obvious that its either fake or wrong. for example they had a MYTH of a god-like creature and somehow they put it in ACTUAL HISTORY CLASS for kids? google "檀君" or "hroukiliv dankastle". they just think whatever "proves" that they have a long history is true and ignore everything else. it shows how they have no respect to true history and are pathetic. people keep bragging about what they dont have and are insecure of, that why koreans get crazy when people tell them they have no original culture. thats the same reason why they dont have sportsmanship
Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China Hanfu is from Korea wen Korea ruled China before Ming dynasty we influenced in China 1500years ago Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China. Just that’s science and truth. China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture Protect ur original culture Koreans and all world liked ur origin Not copy from others Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China Hanfu prove our history letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture Not from China We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago. You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin. Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea Youguys insist Ours r from Korea We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time No one says kimono is Korean cloth China is greedy China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? China will be broken Chinese will admit their greedy fault and Tibet and Hongkong and Taiwan will be happy and free China will be heaven when they will be broken completely
@김정환 Every country has problems. If you have time to talk about these, why not find the truth to help South Korean actresses who killded themselves. For example: Jang Ja-yeon Choi Jin-sil Sulli Goo Hara etc
@냥냥펀치 China is not the union of Han, it’s a union of 56 cultures, including Han. Qing is only one part of Chinese history, ruled by Mongolian and Manchu. The part of culture that Koreans had been using as reference is Ming, ruled by Han. Chinese culture is not as simple as Korean’s since they have a much more profound history and capacious land. By the way, you could purchase history books at good price on taobao when shopping for hair bands made in Zhejiang. Do not do plastic surgery on your brain, it’s fetal and ridiculous.
고려 관복도 비슷했음. 즉 명보다 일찍 건국된 고려 관복이 먼저니 명의 관복은 고려의 관복을 가져온건가? ㅋㅋㅋ 이렇게 하면 진짜 서로 역사를 거슬러 올라가며 싸우게 됨. 그냥 한복이 중국꺼라고 하게 놔두셈 영어도 중국의 사투리 러시아어도 중국의 사투리 축구도 골프도 테니스도 중국이 발상지라고 하고 있잖음 그러면서 다 벽화로 있고 그림으로 남아있고 이러는데 그거 누가 세계에서 중국 꺼라고 합니까? 피파가 축구의 발상지는 중국이라고 하고 있는데 그걸 믿는 인간이 어디있음? ㅋㅋㅋ 냅두셈 외국인들도 한복이 한국꺼인거 알고 있음.
@@o2k62 그렇게 방심하면 어느순간에 우리의 전통 문화제를 빼앗낄수가 있어요. 쟤네들이 외국인한테 "어? 니들 잘못안거임. 한복사실 중국꺼임 봐봐 증거도 있잖아~~" 이렇게 하면 믿을 수 있으니깐 이기회에 이러한 것을 뿌리를 뽑아야 해요. 그리고 영어도 자기네 꺼라고 그러지만 방송에서도 막 영어는 중국 사투리라고는 안하잖아요.
South Koreans say that the influence of Hanbok on Hanfu is mainly due to the records of the Yuan Dynasty in the Zizhi Tongan Xu （资治通鉴续）. During the Yuan Dynasty, China set up an eastern province in Korea, and the king of Korea served as the Prime Minister of the eastern province. The king of Korea was only the second leader of a province in China. Since then, the six generations of kings of Korea did not get the temple name, but received posthumous titles from the Yuan Dynasty, The posthumous titles are all marked with the word "Zhong" .The period from 1270 to 1356 was called the "Yuan intervention period".The murals of the tomb of bureaucrat Park Yi in Miyang, South Korea, show the Mongolian style of the late Koryo PeriodUnder the control and influence of the Yuan Dynasty, braided hair and beard clothes were popular in the Koryo, and the loyal king once ordered to shave hair and change Mongolia clothes. Koryo has been Mongolian, and Koryo is braided hair and improved Mongolian clothes. A large number of eunuchs and palace maids in the Yuan Dynasty came from Korea. According to the time records, these Mongolia style palace maids affected the clothes of some Mongolian nobles. In addition, it is obvious that male Mongolian nobles cannot be Affected from the clothes of Korean eunuchs. The clothes of the Yuan Dynasty are not considered to be one kind of Hanfu, but Mongolian clothes. After the establishment of the Ming Dynasty, Zhu Yuanzhang clearly instructed to restore the clothes of the Han traditional costume, and the clothes of the Yuan Dynasty were thrown into the pile of old paper, so how can we talk about the influence of hanbok on the Hanfu of the Ming Dynasty? After the establishment of the Ming Dynasty, Koryo quickly changed from a province of the Yuan Dynasty to a subsidiary of the Ming Dynasty. The clothes of the Jorge king's officials were rewarded by China. Finally, Koryo could wear Mongolian clothes no more and without braiding. It was obvious who influenced who.
Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China. Just that’s science and truth. China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture Protect ur original culture Koreans and all world liked ur origin Not copy from others Hanfu is from Korea And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China Hanfu is from Korea When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty . Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China Hanfu prove our history letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture Not from China We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others? Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago. You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin. Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea Youguys insist Ours r from Korea We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time No one says kimono is Korean cloth China is greedy China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
不尊重历史的韩国人喜欢编造历史！毫无文化的韩国人喜欢对别人说三道四！殖民地国家真的很悲哀！还需要别人来保护？역사를 존중하지 않는 한국인들은 역사를 조작하기를 좋아한다!아무런 문화도 없는 한국인들은 남에 대해 이러쿵저러쿵하기를 좋아한다.식민지 국가는 정말 슬프다!누가 지켜줘야 해?韩国女人正在排队去伺候驻韩美军！韩国女人正在全世界去慰问那些需要他们的男人한국 여성들이 주한미군의 시중을 들고 줄을 서고 있다!한국 여자들이 전 세계에서 자신들을 원하는 남자들을 위로하고 있다
No, the earliest record of Hanboks are from the Three Kingdoms period in the Korean peninsula. Its cloths are related to the horseriding, steppe tribes, which could be cross-referenced by presence of Tengri in the Korean folklore. It's not from Ming, it's from the steppe.
I said I wanted a logical discussion in this video, so I don't have any expectations, but I'll give it a try. In other Chinese videos, they just deleted my comment. First, it is influenced but interactive. Hanbok and Hanfu have different roots. Hanbok is based on the clothing of the northern equestrian people, and Hanfu is based on the clothing of the southern settled people. Accordingly, China's Hanfu was also a form in which men also wore skirts in the ancient era, but in the 3rd century BC, under the influence of Hufu, they began to wear pants. There is a record in the Jaji Tonggam that while King Jo Muryeong was enforcing the ban on wearing trousers, Chinese society vehemently rejected it, calling it barbarian culture. Additionally, due to frequent exchanges with Joseon during the Ming Dynasty, similar cultures often appear. To conclude, the Ming Dynasty clothing that is suggested to be similar to Hanbok, which China claims to be an imitation of Hanbok, is Goryeo style brought over from Goryeo. The Hanfu of the Yuan Ming Dynasty was greatly influenced by the Hanbok from the late Goryeo Dynasty to the early Joseon Dynasty due to the influence of the Goryeo style that was popular during the Yuan Dynasty, and Chinese historical materials such as Sokjachi Tonggam also record that Chinese clothing during that period was influenced by the Goryeo style. In other words, it is not that Hanfu from the Ming Dynasty came over and became Hanbok, but rather, Hanbok came over and changed Hanfu into the way it was during the Ming Dynasty. In addition, Danryeong, which was given and maintained by the Ming imperial family, is a costume that originated in the West and spread through China. Of course, a lot of Chinese culture and clothing were imported to the Korean Peninsula, and Tang Dynasty clothing was adopted as royal clothing by most countries in East Asia. Han Chineseists ignore the history of the introduction of Goryeo style clothes and claim that Goryeo style hanfu is an independent Han clothing, was influenced by the Tang Dynasty, or that Ming Dynasty Hanfu influenced Hanbok. However, according to common sense, if Koryo-style hanfu was the unique cultural attire of the Han people, there was no reason for the Ming royal family to ban it by edict, saying, "This is not a Chinese custom." Also, influence is overinterpreted. Just because a country has been influenced by it, the clothing and culture of that country cannot all become imitations. The fact that ancient Japan's clothing was so strongly influenced by Baekje's clothing that it was worn directly from Baekje is also described in a number of Japanese records, such as Nihon Shoki and Shangfu Ryuki. However, that does not mean that kimono is collectively called hanbok. In other words, culture is not imperialism that takes over each country. Cultures are transmitted, merge, or coexist. In a similar case, Neo-Confucianism was strongly influenced by Buddhism in India and Nepal. However, it is the same as saying that Neo-Confucianism is the Buddhist ideology of India and Nepal. Second, the traditional clothing of the Korean people does not represent the entire hanbok. Based on the Korean-Chinese hanbok, it can be said that the Korean-Chinese hanbok exists in Chinese traditional clothing. However, it is incorrect to interpret the Hanbok of the Korean people as one of Chinese costumes. In the past, China used the ethnic Koreans to carry out the Northeast Project to intentionally deny the history of Goguryeo and Balhae, that is, Korean history, and reduce them to a minority in China. Of course, it is not currently underway, but the problem is that in the private sector, Chinese people still cite studies from the Northeast Project and provide incorrect information to foreign sites and foreigners. In this situation, Hanbok is shown to foreigners and, without any further explanation, they say, “Because there are Korean-Chinese people, it is a traditional Chinese costume.” If so, even in the private sector in Korea, it is inevitable to receive fierce criticism, such as "China's influence and subcategories are often emphasized without any historical context." In order for China to call the Korean-Chinese and Hanbok traditional clothing, it must recognize Hanbok as Korea's unique clothing. Korea is a different country from China, Hanbok is Korea's unique traditional costume inherited from northern nomadic peoples, and the Hanbok worn by Korean-Chinese people is also a traditional costume derived from Korea's Hanbok. This must be explained in advance to avoid 'misunderstandings'. In conclusion, although it is true that China has had a great influence on East Asia, it is only at the level of “influence.” The influence of western regions such as the Hobok of the northern nomadic tribes, Korea's Goryeo Yang, and Central Asia and India on China cannot be ignored. Claiming that another country's culture is one's own based on cross-cultural influence is simply a claim that causes discomfort in the country in question. This is also true in other cultures. In the case of European traditional clothing, after the fall of Western Rome, Gothic clothing was popular, and then through Southern Europe and France, at one time even Turkish and Persian clothing were popular, and now they are wearing suits originating from England, and these past clothing are their own unique style. I do not claim that it is the culture and clothing of . By this logic, Chinese culture was also influenced by Korea, so it would be meaningless to argue that Chinese culture is a part of Korean culture. Incidentally, Hanfu is a traditional Chinese clothing. However, the modern Hanfu popular in China is not traditional Chinese clothing. The reason is simple. In fact, Hanfu was fused with the clothing of the Manchu people, and has been passed down to modern times under the name of cheongsam. The Chinese claim that the cheongsam is the clothing of the Manchu people, and that the original Chinese clothing was hanfu. This is no different from cultural imperialism. Culture does not move towards an imperialistic form as the Chinese claim. They fuse together and develop in a better direction. Hanbok developed into its modern form through exchanges with various cultures, including Hanfu and Kimono. Even if we study Goguryeo clothing now and wear it again, it is bound to be reinterpreted in a new form. This is because we do not even know how people wore clothes during the Goguryeo period. In other words, you are wearing a newly created costume rather than a traditional costume. It is correct to see Hanfu as a reinterpretation of the Hanfu wearing movement that is popular in modern China. I don't even know how to wear Hanfu, so isn't it inevitable that it will have to be reinterpreted? It even looks different from the Hanfu of the past. To be exact, it is closer to Hanbok. If you deny the entire cheongsam, the unique beauty of hanfu mixed in it will also disappear, and then people will try to take a part of it from hanbok that looks similar. Then it has no choice but to resemble hanbok. Considering that China's Hanfu wearing movement also took place after the popularity of K-pop and Korean dramas, we can see that Hanfu = Hanbok was an unreasonable claim due to China's cultural inferiority complex. In other words, the reality of Hanfu is a fake that is completely different from the Hanfu of the past, and is a newly created costume in modern times. Just because the name is borrowed from tradition does not mean it is a traditional costume. In other words, Hanbok can be listed as a UNESCO cultural heritage, but Hanfu cannot. China needs to love its traditional culture. Cheongsam is a unique Chinese traditional culture that was passed down through the fusion of Manchurian clothing and Hanfu during the Qing Dynasty. Now, denying the cheongsam and insisting on Hanfu is in fact denying their own history of the Qing Dynasty and Hanfu, and in conclusion, they cannot help but fall into the same contradiction as denying the entire history of China. Considering these circumstances, it is highly likely that China's cultural misunderstandings and misconceptions will strengthen its negative influence on Korea. In reality, it is only worsening the feelings of each country, and China's external image is worsening. On the contrary, in the process of fighting like this, Hanbok becomes more famous. Lastly, it occurred to me, but I hope that no one appears who says, ‘Both cheongsam and hanfu are Chinese.’ As explained above, Hanfu cannot be revived in modern times. Hanfu already exists under the name of cheongsam, so how can it be revived? It is impossible to resurrect a living person. This kind of behavior is no different from a child throwing a tantrum and claiming that everything is his or hers. Simply put, that is cultural imperialism. In the past, there was a saying like this in Joseon. “The territory is too large to be called a small country, and the mind is too narrow to be called a great country, so it is called China.” It's natural, but it's extremely wrong to say and do, and I really hate this. So don't let me get to the horrible reality that these words were true. I want to like China.
중국은 젓가락을 발명했다. 한국인들은 젓가락이 중국보다 짧기 때문에 중국이 아닌 한국에서 젓가락을 발명했다고 말할 것이다. 한국의 고대사 : 중국의 개가되다 한국 근현대사 : 일본의 개가되다 한국 근대사 : 미국의 개되기 언제나 개가 될 나라는 전 주인 앞에서 소리 친다
Japan: Kimono came from China a thousand years ago South Korea: Hanbok did not originate in China, or China originated in South Korea A thief named South Korea steals things China invented chopsticks: Koreans will say that chopsticks were invented in Korea, not China, because Korean chopsticks are shorter than Chinese. Ancient History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of China Modern History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of Japan Modern History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of America A country that will always be a dog yells in front of its former owner
Japan: Kimono came from China a thousand years ago South Korea: Hanbok did not originate in China, or China originated in South Korea A thief named South Korea steals things China invented chopsticks: Koreans will say that chopsticks were invented in Korea, not China, because Korean chopsticks are shorter than Chinese. Ancient History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of China Modern History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of Japan Modern History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of America A country that will always be a dog yells in front of its former owner
Translation: Let me tell you a joke. ( Not told by me. I am just sharing this joke by a foreign guy from a TV show. ) Somebody told me Aliens built Pyramid. I said it was Egyptians. That person insisted on his point of view but I was too lazy to argue so I just said it was built by South Koreans.
@@csik7996 한국은그들의문화가없다는것을폭로하고, 매일중국의것을표절하고, 중국사람들의웃음거리가되고, 한국은그들의역사가오래다고하지만이름난명인한사람을내지못한다고말했다.중국역사는 모르시겠지만 삼국지는 해보셨죠.이것은 문화 지식 아니, 한국은 모두 중국의 성어와 음식 문화를 포함합니다.한국은 오직 성형의 걸 그룹 문화 👎
@@laughing6206 Not only the "fake Korean Wave," which openly copies Korean trademarks and products, but also the "fake Korean Wave," a foreign product packaged as if it were a Korean product, is a headache. This is because the low quality of such "fake Korean Wave" products sold overseas may lower the reliability of Korean products to foreign consumers and negatively affect the Korean image. Logos of major "Fake Korean Wave" companies. According to the distribution industry and KOTRA on the 19th, MUMUSO, a Chinese household goods store, is mentioned as a representative example. Although its headquarters is a Chinese company in Shanghai, China, it uses "KR" for brand marks and imitates Korean products and designs. The product belongs to a Chinese company, and the packaging is also distributed with false Hangul and Korean-related logos engraved. Mugunghwa Life is conducting business in more than 30 countries around the world, opening stores in Uruguay and UAE last year. Chinese company Ilahui is operating in major countries in a similar form. The logo is equipped with "KOREA" to advocate a Korean brand. In addition, KIODA (You're cute), YOYOSO (Hansangwoopum), MINIGOOD (Sammu), and XIMISO (Himmyo) have jumped on the Korean Wave and are thriving in Southeast Asia. Those who use Hangul that is not grammatically correct or sell products that plagiarize Korean products and designs are mistaken for Korean brands there. Chinese products sold by "Fake Korean Wave" companies. Awkward Korean expressions stand out. The Korean court ordered the dissolution of Mugunghwa Life and Yeonhye Woopum's Korean subsidiary in 2019. It is believed that a ghost corporation was established in Korea to avoid crackdowns and sanctions by local patent authorities while selling products imitating Korean products on a large scale overseas. In addition, the Korean Intellectual Property Office and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy have also responded by requesting governments in major countries to investigate and crack down. Since then, the government explained that there have been fewer explicit Korean impersonations, such as promoting products in hanbok or specifying that they are Korean brands, but there are still many cases of clever copying of Korean brands and products.
@@laughing6206 1. Since ancient times, Chinese people have been the center of civilization. There is no culture in the surrounding peoples. - Ancient Chinese recorded that they were culturally influenced by the eastern immigrants. Now, it is creating a miracle logic to include the entire Asia in China. 2. China does not stxxal Korean culture.Korea is stealing Chinese culture. It's a typical lie. At the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics, traditional Korean culture was used. Is this all? The Chinese are manipulating that the language of Koreans is part of Chinese. 3. Western media is framing China. - They are claiming to be right, but the lie was eventually revealed. A perfect defense excuse. Numerous people are suffering from China's txxxft of high-tech technologies from other countries. However, the Chinese are pretending not to know even though they know. Conclusion: Unable to communicate with Chinese people They don't feel guilxxy even though they lie. This is the completion of self-dexxption.
@@laughing6206 "중국인들의 계획적인 거짓말" 중국 광저우(廣州)에서 발간되는 신쾌보(新快報)는 최근 ''한중문화 전쟁''이라는특집기사를 통해 한국이 한자를 세계문화유산으로 등재하려는 움직임을 보이고 있다고 전했다. 신쾌보의 보도에 따르면 지난해 ''박정수 서울대 역사학과 교수''가 10여년의 연구 결과 한(韓)민족이 한자를 발명한 이후 중국 중원(中原)으로 옮겨가 한자를 중국에 전하면서 지금의 한족(漢族) 문화가 형성됐다고 주장했다. 박 교수는 한국 정부에 떳떳하게 한자 문화를 복원하고 유네스코에 한자를 세계문화유산으로 신청할 것을 건의했다는 것이다. 그러나 서울대 국사학과나 동양사학과 등에 재직중인 교수중에 ''박정수''라는 이름을 가진 교수는 없으며 한국이 한자를 홀로 세계문화유산으로 등재하려는 움직임도 전혀 없는 것으로 확인되고 있다. 이런 잘못된 보도는 13일 홍콩 문회보(文匯報) 등에도 인용되며 중국 네티즌들의 엉뚱한 분노를 사고 있다. 한국에서 유학했다는 한 중국 네티즌은 한글이 15세기에야 창제됐음을 상기시키며 "이는 중국문화에 대한 도둑질"이라고 주장했다. 신문은 나아가 한국을 필두로 한 중국, 일본, 대만 4개국 학자들이 최근 베이징국제한자회의에서 번체자(繁體字.한국과 대만에서 사용하는 정체자)를 기초로 한 상용 표준한자를 만들기로 했다는 소식을 전하며 반한 감정을 부추기고 있다. 신문은 또 4개국 학자의 표준한자 합의 소식을 부인하며 "간체자(簡體字)는 중국의 법정 문자로 절대 바꿀 수 없는 것"이라는 중국측 대표의 발언을 전하기도 했다. 이밖에도 중국 언론은 강릉단오제의 세계문화유산 등재 이후 한국에서 제기되는 한의학, 두유, 풍수지리 등의 한반도론 주장을 시시콜콜 전하면서 중국 문화를 한국에 빼앗기고 있다는 피해의식에 사로잡혀 있다. 유교 창시자인 공자나 월나라 미인 서시(西施), 명나라 시기 본초강목(本草綱目)의 저자 이시진(李時珍)이 한반도에서 넘어왔다는 근거 불명의 한국내 주장까지 일일이 소개하고 있다. 한국인들은 그런적 없는데 계속 거짓말하네 ㅎ ㅡㅡ 누구말이 맞는지 유네스코에 확인해 보자. 진짜 계획적으로 모함을 하네 ㅎ 이거 중국 공 산 당 이 한국 혐오하게 만드려고 퍼뜨린 거짓말인거 이미 들통났다
《三国史记》中的《新罗本纪》中有“真德王三年正月，始服中朝衣冠”的记载。 《宣和奉使高丽图经》在描写高丽衣冠制度上有“遵我宋之制度焉”的记录。 《高丽史》中也有“三十二年六月，宋神宗赐衣二对”的记录。 崔溥《漂海录》提到：“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国” 朝鲜文人徐居正诗云“明皇若问三韩事，衣冠文物上国同” 李氏朝鲜《成宗实录》中，也有过类似的记载： “吾东方自箕子以来，教化大行，男有烈士之风，女有贞正之俗，史称小中华”。 All those korea historical document are described korea hanbok was heavily influenced by chinese hanfu. After korea prohibited using chinese as official language they are losing there hiatoey too. It's very sad that Koreans can't read their own hiatoey document witch is written in chinese.
Its very stupid for China to say hanbok and kimchi are Chinese all of sudden in 2020 while China had their mouth shut for past centuries. 🤣🤣 Maybe they got jealous cuz of K culture and K Pop being famous
If you have studied the history of East Asia, you will find that almost all the ancient books of Korea were written in Chinese characters before the 20th century. Korea has been an affiliated country of China for 1000 years. In ancient times, Korea did not have its own characters. It was not until the 15th century that King Sejong of Korea invented the Korean characters, but they were not popularized. At the end of the 19th century, Korea was occupied by Japan and broke away from China. In the 20th century, Korean nationalist movement rose, and Korean talents abolished Chinese characters and used Korean characters. Up to now,south Korean identity cards are still marked with Chinese characters, because Korean characters are a kind of phonetic symbols, which can not distinguish different names. Many names with the same pronunciation are easy to be confused.
Don't lie Chinese people who have been ruled by other peoples for more than 1000 years have distorted history There was no kingdom that Korea relied on China except for the Joseon Dynasty When Tang of China invaded the Korean Peninsula in 675, Silla blocked it well, and during the Goryeo Dynasty, China's Song Dynasty was conquered by Jurchen and Mongol while sending tribute to neighboring countries. The ancient kingdom of China was periodically destroyed by other peoples every 300 years, but ancient the ruler of Korean kingdom was always Korean. Joseon was an independent country different from China. The concept of a subsidiary state cannot be applied. This is because even when Song, Yuan, MING, and Qing of China were destroyed, the kingdom of the Korean Peninsula had nothing to do with it. The Chinese treated Korea as their subsidiary country, but since ancient times, Korea has been a different culture and society from China. For example, the Chinese have maintained the footbinding culture for over 1,000 years, but there was no such culture in ancient Korea. Since ancient times, China has been invaded by many other ethnic groups and there have been many natural disasters and famine, so the culture of eating people has been maintained until the 20th century, but there is no such culture in Korea. Even now, Chinese people still have a culture of taking medicine made from the umbilical cord of newborn babies and using newborn babies for medicine. It is completely narcissism that the Chinese take pride in ancient history and culture
Yes and that is so pathetic. Koreans cannot read chinese characters, which means most of korean people cannot understand thier true ancient history. In this way, they'll follow the posts on the Internet instead of learning chinese to read their history which recorded in chinese. Zazaza
Hanfu is from Korea And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China Hanfu is from Korea When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty . Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China Hanfu prove our history letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture Not from China We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
古代韩国→中国附属国 고대 한국→ 중국의 속국 →🧎🏻🧎🏻♂️🙇🏻♂️ 现代韩国→美国附属国 현대 한국→ 미국의 속국 →🦮🦮🦮 古代韩国人的历史书还是用汉字写的 和宗主国争夺古代文化就像说美国嘻哈模仿K-Pop一样可笑🥺 고대 한국인의 역사서는 그래도 한자로 쓴 것이다 .고대 문화를 놓고 대 군주와 경쟁하는 것은 미국 힙합이 K-Pop을 모방한다고 말하는 것만 큼 우스꽝 스럽습니다.🥺
All of China's history, culture, and customs are recorded in historical literature and archaeology written by ancient people, while South Korea takes science fiction historical novels written by modern people as real history. There is no historical literature written by ancient people, and there is no archaeological evidence. The funniest thing is that there are Chinese materials in Korean museums that prove that Korea used to be a vassal state of China. Koreans treat it as a treasure, but they cannot understand the content inside and do not recognize it as a vassal state of China! Lastly, why does South Korea claim everything to be its own instead of North Korea? Didn't North Korea and South Korea use to be the one country?Koreans also celebrate Christmas, why not say it's Korean Christmas？
@@이은수-r8b congratulation on finding the point. It is precisely because cultures interact that we believe that the use of Spanish does not represent one's identity. Chinese characters are the same, which represents China's influence on the Korean region. Otherwise, if Korean culture is really so independent, then now Korea should have its own language instead of using Chinese characters. Or do you want to tell me that Chinese characters were invented by Koreans?
This symbol is found in a Korean temple which was built 1400 years ago during Silla era. Northern area of China and Koreans have been using this symbol from ancient times, but as far as I know, Han Chinese have nothing to do with this symbol.
@@random_guy1084 Very cute, your message suggested that you don’t know anything about Tai Chi nor I Ching, not that I understand the I Ching myself, but at least I know where it came from. If you want to discuss this matter, I suggest you do some research and I’ll be happy to hear from you, I’m always eager to learn something new. 네, 공부 열심히 하시고 나서 다시 토론 합시다. God bless you all !!
I’m an East Asian Studies student and I remember through most of the time until Japan colonized Korea, Korea was the affiliated country of ancient China. Another funny thing is that since Korean historical literature was mostly written in Chinese characters and the majority modern Korean people can’t read hanza, they refused to learn history. Sad for their bad attitudes. Also l love the way Japanese was influenced by the Tang cultures and transferred to their own styles while super comfortably admitting the origin. I’m really sad about Korean’s attitude. I used to love Kpop but moving forward I don’t think I will.
@@bydamaz3101 first of all their is hanja in middle school course which is ancient chiness charicter, and since there are many moral historicans in korean history, there are lots of translated ancient datas without any censoring like damn china. China means middle nation. This is because it's too big with the terretory but too small for caltural self-esteem and knowledge
Yes, we must not ignore history. But what's more important is no one should claim that something is theirs if it is not. Kimchi, handbok, ssam and more may have similar or related history but are not the same. Time passed and evolved. Move on, please. I wonder how many among those who keep arguing about these history do things so great for their country. Culture can be similar and can come from one another but are not the same. No one from Korea claimed malatang to be Korean food even when it's really popular that a lot of malatang restaurants opened up.
I saw a lot of Koreans on Twitter claiming that Malatang is korean traditional food, ignoring that even Malatang restaurants in SK were opened by chinese. Funny.
Hanfu has influenced the traditional clothing of many neighbouring cultures, including the Korean hanbok,[7][8] the Japanese kimono (wafuku),[9][10] the Okinawan ryusou,[11][12] and the Vietnamese áo giao lĩnh (Việt Phục).[13][14] Up to a certain extent, hanfu has also influenced some elements in Western fashion, especially those influenced by Chinoiserie fashion, due to the popularity of Chinoiserie since the 17th century in Europe and in the United States.[15]: 52 [note 1] Silk remains a core element of Hanfu and Chinese traditional clothing.
어우 그러게요ㅠㅠㅠ 화딱지 나네요 Now i will tell the truth. The name of Hanfu has been established since 2001. Also, Hanfu is clothing that started from following Goryeo's clothing. READ 지정 이래 궁중의 급사와 사령은 태반이 고려의 여인이었다. 自至正以來, 宮中給事使令, 大半爲高麗女. Since the designation, the placenta has been a woman of Goryeo as the chief and commander of the court. 이 때문에 사방의 의복과 신발, 모자, 기물이 모두 고려를 따라 일시의 유행이 되었으니 어찌 우연하다 할 수 있는가? 以故, 四方衣服鞋帽器物, 皆依高麗樣子. 此關系一時風氣, 豈偶然哉. Because of this, clothes, shoes, hats, and articles all over the place became a temporary fashion following Goryeo. How can it be said that it is a coincidence? 권형(權衡), 경신외사(庚申外史) This is Chinese history. Read, and learn from your history. Don't make the lie
@@밤하늘-m7s She isn't lying! what you listed above was in Yuan dynasty... come on you Korean people don't even recognize Yuan dynasty as part of Chinese history and now you are showing me this? Some of the hanfu style has already been like the Ming hanfu 2 piece style since Song dynasty (from actual finding). Plus, the description you can find about 高丽样is completely unrelated to whatever she is showing in her video. It's half sleeve and square collar. So overall, we are in no way claiming 高丽样as hanfu, and don't say hanfu is hanbok... Now read your own history from various times: 1.According to the Samguk sagi삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀): “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製”Translation: Gim Chunchu asked the Emperor of Tang to change the traditional cloth of Silla, the country shall follow the Chinese style)King Taejong Muyeol 무열왕／武烈王, Kim Chun-Chu, was the 29th ruler of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea. In AD648, he asked the Tang Emperor to adopt the Chinese cloth style. 2.According to the “History of Goryeo” 고려사 (高麗史):” 復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服”Translation: Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress. 3.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記): “”真德王三年春正月，始服中朝衣冠“”Translation: In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese-style cloth and hats. Jindeok reigned as Queen of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea, from AD 647 to AD 654. 4.Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty (Joseon Wangjo Sillok) 조선왕조실록. 朝鮮王朝實錄 : 高宗 36卷, 34年( 丁酉 / 대한 광무(光武) 1年) 9月 29日(阳历) 번째기사 " “我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可"Translation: Korean King, Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗 said: "The territories of Korea used to be ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture. 5. Taejo of Goryeo고려 태조高麗 太祖 left 10 rules before he is gone, and these ten rules are known as Ten Rules 訓要十條 (훈요10조). The 4th section: 其四曰, 惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉.Translation: We, the East admire the customs of the Tang Dynasty, learn her rite and music, adopt her system and style. People from far land are different from us in terms of humanity, do not try to make them look similar in a subservient manner. The nature of Khitan (契丹) is brutal and bestial, we do not share the same value or language with them, so do not follow their system of attire.
Listen to your ancestors, you pathetic creature, and read your history! Oops, sorry, they are written in Chinese, you can't understand. hahahahah 1.-According to the Samguk sagi삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀): “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製” -Translation: Kim Chunchu asked the Emperor of Tang dynasty to change the traditional cloth of Silla to follow the Chinese Hanfu system. King Taejong Muyeol 무열왕／武烈王, Kim Chun-Chu, was the 29th ruler of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea. In AD 648, he asked the Tang Emperor for permission to adopt the Chinese Hanfu style. 2.-Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記): “”真德王三年春正月，始服中朝衣冠“” -Translation: In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese Hanfu, including clothes and hats. Jindeok reigned as Queen of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea, from AD 647 to AD 654. 3.-Wang Geon(왕건/王建)(877-943), the first King of the Goryeo Dynasty and the founder of Goryeo Yang(고려양/高麗樣) said in the "Ten Instructions" (훈요십조/訓要十條). -我東方舊慕唐風，文物禮樂，悉尊其制……契丹是禽獸之國，風俗不同，言語亦異，衣冠制度，慎勿效焉。 -Translation:All the systems of antiques/articles, rituals, instruments of our country are following the Tang dynasty (of course the costume system is included in)...Khitan is a country of animals, we are different from them in custom and language, and we should not learn the costume system from Khitan.
전 한국인입니다 지난 몇년간 이거 관련해서 논란이 많았는데 여러 사이트에서 한푸나 한복 관련 게시물들에 달리는 한국댓글들을 보며 좀 놀랐습니다 보통 논란이 생기면 상황을 파악하고 논리적인 주장을 할텐데 밑도 끝도 없이 중국이 한국 배꼈다니 중국이 또 한국 문화를 뺏어가니 중국 역사는 중국인 스스로 다 불태웠다느니하면서 인신공격이나 하는 사람들이 대부분이에요 한국 사람들은 다 이랬던가요..? 이 영상에서의 댓글도 그렇네요… 저도 의복의 역사에 대해 잘 알지 못하고 잘 해결된(?) 일을 가지고 뒷북 치는거 같지만 아직도 저런 댓글들이 많이 달리는 걸 보니 저라도 뭐라 말을 해야 할거 같아서 이렇게 댓글을 남깁니다.. 보통 치파오가 중국 전통 의상으로 알려져서 한푸가 생소할 수 있는데 영상에서 말했듯 아무래도 같은 시대다 보니 명나라 한푸랑 조선시대 한복이랑 비슷하게 생겼습니다 한푸는 고대부터 한족들의 전통 의상을 통칭하는 말입니다 알다시피 우리나라는 의복을 포함해 여러 문화적 측면에서 중국의 영향을 크게 받았습니다 말했듯이 의복에 대해 잘 모르지만 우리나라는 조선시대 이전부터 중국의 복식을 많이 받아들여왔습니다 신라시대엔 왕실과 귀족들이 당나라 복식을 수입해 입었고 특히 조선시대엔 영상에서처럼 관료복 같이 왕실에서 입는 옷들은 아예 중국에서 하사받았습니다 물론 우리쪽에서 영향을 준 것도 있겠고 둘다 중국의 영향만 받은 것도 아니겠지만요(몽골의 영향도 받은 것처럼) 애초에 나라가 서로 이웃하니까 영향을 주고받는게 당연하기도 하고, 나라 자부심 때문에(흔히 말해 국뽕…?) 굳이 누가 더 영향을 줬고 하면서 싸우고 깎아내리기 보단 순수하게 문화를 즐기고 더 발전시키는게 맞다고 생각합니다 또 한국댓글들을 보면서 자꾸 한복을 뺏어 간다는 댓글이 많은거 같아서 상황설명을 좀 하자면 말한거처럼 한복이 명나라 한푸랑 비슷해서 한푸사진에 중국꺼라고 해놓은걸 보고 한푸에 대해 잘 모르는 사람들이 한복을 중국꺼라고 한다고 오해했거나 조선족이 중국 소수민족이라 한복 또한 중국 전통 의복이 될 수 있다는 말을 듣고 또 오해한 거 같아요
And looking at ancient Chinese records and Korean records, Korean ancestors wore hobok(hu dress). Basically these hobok were separated tothe top clothes and pants. But originally, hanfu in China was a dress that wrapped around the body without pants. However, this hobok design spread to China from the time when the people dominating the mainland of China were replaced by the northern Manchurian- Mongols line. After all, Yuan era clothes in the Ming Dynasty, which the Chinese now claim to be hanfu, is a clothing influenced by hobok, which has become widespread since the Mongolian Yuan period. This is a groundless interpretation even if the Chinese claim that everything originated in hanfu
@@집착광공-k1o 《续资治通鉴 卷二百一十四 元纪三十二》记载：“后亦多畜高丽美人，大臣有权者，辄以此遗之，京师达官贵人，必得高丽女然后为名家。自至正以来，宫中给事使令，大半高丽女，以故四方衣服、靴帽、器物，皆仿高丽，举世若狂。” "황후도 역시 고려미인으로 삼아, 대신유권자는 곧 이를 귀하게 여겨, 수도 고관귀인은 반드시 고려여자를 얻은 후에야 명가가 된다. 그렇게 된 이래, 궁중급사사령, 대반이 고려여자이며, 이런 이유로 사방의 의복, 신발과 모자, 기물 모든것을 고려를 모방해, 온 세상이 미친 것 같다." 라고 기록되어 있습니다. 고려시대 원나라로 공녀로 간 여자들 중에는 황후까지 된 자도 있었으며 많은 수가 시녀로, 궁녀로, 귀족의 첩으로 갔으며, 이들이 가지고 간 고려의 문화는 명나라까지 이어지게 된것이다. 또한 [숙원잡기]의 기록에는,《菽园杂记》：：“马尾裙始于朝鲜国，流入京师……于是无贵无贱，服者日盛。至成化末年，朝臣多服之者矣。阁老万公安冬夏不脱……。大臣不服者惟黎吏侍淳一人而已。此服妖也，弘治初始有禁例。” 마미군은 조선국(고려)에서 시작되어, 수도로 유입됬으며......귀천을 가리지 않고 복식이 날로 성했다. 성화말년에 이르러, 조정 신하들도 입게 되었다. 각로만공안이 겨울에도 여름에도 벗지 않았다.....이 복식은 요사하므로, 홍치 초시에 금지되었다. 또 [만포필기]에는, 《寓圃笔记》:"发裙之制，以马尾编成，系于衬衣之内。体肥者一裙，瘦削者或二三，使外衣之张，俨若一伞。", 치마를 넓히는 제도는, 말꼬리를 옷안에 엮어서 만든다. 몸을 비대하게 만든 하나의 치마로, 마른사람은 혹 두개 세개를 입는다, 옷을 바깥으로 넓게 퍼지게 만드는데 쓰는데, 우산과 같다."고 기록되어 있다
@@집착광공-k1o Strictly speaking, Mang-geon of Joseon is from China, but its appearance and manufacturing method are completely different from those of China. In the Annals of King Sejong 世宗實錄地理志, there is a record of giving Mami Mang-geon as a gift to the envoy of the Ming Dynasty, and even in ≪조선부 朝鮮賦≫of Dongwol 董越), the envoy of the Ming Dynasty, who came in 1488 (the 19th year of King Seongjong's reign), all Joseon mangans are made of horse tail hair. In fact, Wang-gin of the Ming Dynasty was in the form of a net-shaped hat without lacquer. As such, Mang-geon and various hats are improved by Koreans. The method of using horse tail hair as a material was a unique creation of Joseon. There are several records of the case in which only Mang-geon was stolen when Joseon envoy went to China. It is obvious cultural thexxxft for Chinese people to walk around wearing Joseon's horse tail hair Mang-geon these days. Chinese people accuse Korea of stealing drama costumes, but Chinese drama costumes are a completely different cultural apprxxxxxxtion
@@nationfighting3929 한푸에 대해 좀 자세히 알아봤는데 한푸는 말하신대로 본래 원피스 형태였고 기원전 200년 쯤? 조무령왕때 호복령으로 바지(치마) 저고리의 투피스 형태가 들어오게 되었다고 하네요 그 후로도 계속 호복의 영향을 많이 받아왔고요… (명나라 초기때 유군이 아닌 오군을 입음(유군 또한 이런 투피스 형태로 북방 유목민족인 적족(狄族)의 한 갈래인 백적(白狄)계 국가인 중산국에서 유행한 옷이 기원으로 다른 동아시아 국가에도 퍼져 크게 유행함) - 고려나 다른 북방 민족의 영향으로 보임) (흔히 아는 원령포(圓領袍)는 서아시아에서 빌려온 것으로, 중국에서 현지화 되어 다른 동아시아 국가로 퍼져나감 단령 또한 거란족이나 선비족같은 몽골계 유목민이 입던 것이 기원) (제흉유군 또한 선비족의 호복이 당나라에 들어와 만들어짐) 한푸는 여러 왕조마다 그 형태가 달랐으며 어떻게 대중들이 입어왔고 어떤 식으로 만들어진지 알 수 없이 발굴된 것을 단순 복원하고 한푸 복원에 있어 특히 끈을 메는 방법 등등 현대에 와서 추측 창조한 것도 많아서 전통의 개념에 부합하는지 잘 모르겠고 모호한 감이 없지 않아 있네요 전통이라기보단 문화라고 보는게 맞을 거 같아요 또 중국대륙에 이민족 국가도 많았고요(당나라도 한족과 선비족이 세운 나라라고 알고 있습니다) (삼국시대 한복과 일본 복식 모두 호복에서 비롯되었지만 둘 다 뒤로 한푸의 영향을 많이 받았음) 또 명나라 한푸와 조선시대 한복이 비슷하게 생긴 이유를 정리하면 1 둘 다 원나라 몽골의 지배를 받아 몽골풍의 영향을 크게 받았다 (질손, 예살(철릭), 답호, 흉배, 운견, 발립 등등) 2 원나라 명나라에 고려양이 들어왔다 3 위 영상에서처럼 조선이 명에서부터 관복이나 유교 복식을 수입해왔다(조선 이전에도 왕실이나 귀족들은 중국의 한푸를 많이 수입해 입었다) 위 여성분이 입고 있는 한푸의 문양이나 관복이나 예살, 마면군에 수놓는 문양들은 모두 흉배가 기원으로 몽골풍이고 갓 또한 발립으로부터 점차 변한것으로 몽골풍입니다 예살(한국은 철릭)또한 몽골풍이고 도포와 직철 모두 몽골풍입니다 투피스 형태로 입고 속에 마미군을 입은 명나라 초기 한푸는 고려양도 보이네요 애초에 이런종류의 극히 소수의 귀족들이 몇 차례 입을수도 없는 예복류의 복장은 소수 사대부들만 입었고 대다수 사대부들에게 요사스런 옷으로 고발당하기도 했습니다 대부분 한족(漢族)들은 교령의 도포와 교령의 오군을 입지않았습니다 당시 남자들은 주로 원령포, 여자들은 중국식 윗옷의 두 섶이 겹치지 않고 가운데에서 단추로 채우게 되어 있는 것인 유군과 배자를 입었습니다 말했듯이 이렇게 복잡하게 영향을 주고 받았는데 누가 영향을 더 줬니 누가 누굴 배꼈니 분별하기 힘들기도 힘들고 진짜 의미도 없어 보이네요 그래도 영향을 주고 받으면서 중국이 독자적으로 매우 아름다운 문화를 구축했다고 생각합니다 동북아시아의 문화를 주도하고 주변 국들에게 막대한 영향을 준 것도 사실입니다 솔직히 같은 동양인으로서 자랑스럽고 참 대단하다는 생각이 듭니다 또 말했듯이 굳이 이렇게 누가 더 낫니하면서 싸우고 서로 깎아내리기 보단 순수하게 문화를 즐기고 더 발전시키는게 맞다고 생각합니다 보니까 님도 이 계정에서 댓글을 몇천 개나 쓰셨던데 중국인들과 싸우면서(대부분 중국인이겠죠…?) 솔직히 스트레스도 많이 받고 힘들었을 거라 생각합니다 한국인이라고 한국을 치켜세우는데 너무 연연하지 마시고 있는 그대로 받아들이자구요 현실은 저희 바람과 많이 다르잖아요? 또 제 말중 틀린 정보가 있다면 알려주시고 좋은 하루 보내세요!!🤗
@@집착광공-k1o 중국인들은 조선시대 한복은 중국문화를 복붙했다고 일반화시키고 역사를 편향적으로 해석하고 있음. 너님이 중국이 동북아시아문화를 주도했다고 결론짓는것도 논리적 비약임 중국인들이 조선시대 갓과 망건을 착용하고 한푸 패션쇼를 개최하는것을 아는가? 중국드라마를 보면 조선시대 한복 장신구가 등장하고 중국인들이 18세기이후 조선시대 복장을 입고 등장함 ㅎ 중국인들의 문화 날조에 항의하지 않으면 수백년이 지났을때 전세계의 사람들은 모든것을 중국문화로 인식하게 될텐데 이것이 심각하지 않다고? ㅎ
First of all, whether China is democratic or not is none of your business. Secondly, please don’t change the subject. We are now discussing South Korea’s stealing of Chinese culture, not whether China is democratic.
Korean changed their language few hundred years ago , they were using Chinese before because China ruled Korea , Korean changed their master one after one , China , Japan and now US, Korean also changed their capital city from 汉城 to Seoul not too long ago , because the city name means Chinese city , they changed their face through plastic surgery too , now Korean think it’s time to change their history ……..
이거 복붙하면 설명 끝납니다. 馬尾裙始于朝鮮國, 流入京師...于是無貴無賤, 服者日盛. 至成化末年, 朝臣多服之者矣...此服妖也, 弘治初始有禁例 - Translation: horsetail dress, which originated from Choseon, came to the capital...regardless of rich and poor, more and more people wore it...in the last years of Chenghua, a lot of court officials wore it, too...this clothing was too inappropriate, so it was banned during the early reign of Hongzhi emperor (9th emperor of Ming) 記載: 后亦多畜高麗美人, 大臣有權者, 輒以此遺之, 京師達官貴人, 必得高麗女然後爲名家...以故四方衣服, 靴帽, 器物, 皆倣高麗, 擧世若狂 - Translation: it is written: even the queen is chosen from Koryo (ancient Korea) people, and high court officials admired this, so all high rank people in the capital earned prestige only after marrying a Koryo woman...For this reason, clothing, shoes, hats and vessels everywhere is emulating more and more Koryo style, and it seems like the whole world is insane. 宮衣新尙高麗樣, 方領過腰反臂裁. 連夜內家爭借看, 爲曾著過禦前來 - 宮中詞 (by 張昱) Translation: Court clothing style all venerates the style of Koryo (thus the name Koryoyang), with angled collar past the waist and short sleeves. Night by night people jostle to see it, because they attended the court with these clothes
@Loong Hwang you are just jealous lol plz stop making your own country stupid. China is a great country only if there's no people like you. Oh and plz study history =) Jakckie Chan and Jet Li are Koreans. How do you feel? lolz
I’m an East Asian Studies student and I remember through most of the time until Japan colonized Korea, Korea was the affiliated country of ancient China. Another funny thing is that since Korean historical literature was mostly written in Chinese characters and the majority modern Korean people can’t read hanza, they refused to learn history. Sad for their bad attitudes. Also l love the way Japanese was influenced by the Tang cultures and transferred to their own styles while super comfortably admitting the origin. I’m really sad about Korean’s attitude.
@JENNYLEEWORLD I don't know if it is written in your country's history book. If it is, I can only say that you are ignorant and very ignorant. Respect for history is respect for yourself. Obviously, you can't do it. You won't admit that South Korea was a subsidiary of China in ancient times, nor that it was enslaved by Japan in modern times, nor that it is now a dog of the United States. South Korea now wants to build cultural confidence, but you don't have much culture at all, so you can only make it up, The south is obviously more suitable for survival. Only a fool can take tens of thousands of people to the north. The world thinks that you Koreans can only steal and have no shame
@JENNYLEEWORLD In order to respect you, I checked the relevant information. Witv divided China's historical dynasties into two. One is the dynasty established by the Han nationality, and the other is the dynasty established by the ethnic minorities (grassland nomads and forest fishing and hunting nationalities) who have been in contact with each other for a long time in the Central Plains. The latter is subdivided into infiltration dynasty and conquest dynasty according to the policy of Korea and China. Infiltration dynasty: It is mainly divided into two groups. The first group is from the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty to the Western Jin Dynasty. For example, the five lakes and sixteen countries are the former, the latter, the former Qin, the latter and the former, while the northern dynasties are the Northern Wei and Northern Zhou dynasties. [2] Another wave is the dynasty and state established by the Hanized Shatafan Town from the end of the Tang Dynasty to the five dynasties and ten states. The common feature of these regimes is that they directly absorb a culture and finally completely sinicize it. Dynasty conquest: In the five dynasties, at the end of the Song and Ming dynasties, they occupied part or all of the territory of the Central Plains and established the Liao, Jin, Yuan, Qing and other dynasties respectively. Considering the precedent of the previous penetration into the various nationalities of the dynasty, these nationalities tried to maintain their own culture while sinicizing.
I tried to start a respectful discussion backed up by historical references which can all be found on ENGLISH SITES. non of my materials came from Chinese references. i even read all my references ALOUD in the video, and if you watched the video, you will realize that my main arguing points came from books written by Korean authors. and yet it seems that a large portion of the comment section didn't even watch the video before making a comment. swearing, spamming, attacking me personally, attacking other nations and calling names will not make you right. it will only make you look more ignorant
(btw, i can see the average watch time of this video in the content creator page. and guess how long that is? only 2 minutes. 2 minutes into this video i haven't even gotten to the main argument yet. so unless you watched the full video, pls think again before commenting)
토론같은소리하네.
@@ShiyinOfficial 굳이 다보고 조회수올려줄생각없고
다른 컨텐츠에서 보고 왔음
姐姐，支持你！谢谢你upload 这个视频！你真的真的很棒！！！
姐姐加油
I am Japanese. Japanese textbooks say that Japanese culture, including kimono and Zen, evolved from ancient Chinese culture. Japan respected the culture of Tang and Song and achieved its own development to become Japanese culture.
私は日本人です。日本の教科書には、着物や禅をはじめとする日本の文化は、古代中国の文化から発展したものであると書かれています。日本は唐や宋の文化を尊敬し、独自の発達を遂げて日本文化になったのです。
Stop stealing !
Happy Korean Christmas
Happy Korean Easter
Happy Korean Diwali
Happy Korean Halloween!
Stop lying! Stop cheating! Stop stealing!
ええ。。日本は 全部中国か。。オ-ケ
めでたしめでたし
Thank you. I respect your honoring the history. There are many Korean online trying to back stapping Chinese by their fake account.
张昱《张光弼诗集》卷三《宫中词》： 宫衣新尚高丽样，方领过腰半臂载，连夜内家争借看，为曾着过御前来。"
"궁중에서 새롭게 유행하는 것은 고려양이라네 방령에 짧은 허리, 반소매 궁중 여인들이 밤까지 이어져 구경하려 하네 이는 고려 여인이 황제 앞에 이 옷을 입고왔기 때문이라네"
Translation: The new trend in the palace is Goryeo Style. Short-waist, short-sleeved court women in Bangryeong continue to watch until night.
The Short-waist, short-sleeved clothes has nothing to do with Ming dynasty Hanfu, another evidence that Hanbok was influenced by Hanfu, because in Yuan dynasty Korean still wear Short-waist, short-sleeved clothes.
[숙원잡기]《菽园杂记》：：“马尾裙始于朝鲜国，流入京师……于是无贵无贱，服者日盛。至成化末年，朝臣多服之者矣。阁老万公安冬夏不脱……。大臣不服者惟黎吏侍淳一人而已。此服妖也，弘治初始有禁例。”
"마미군은 조선국(고려)에서 시작되어, 수도로 유입됬으며......귀천을 가리지 않고 복식이 날로 성했다. 성화말년에 이르러, 조정 신하들도 많이 입게 되었다. 각로 모두 공, 사, 겨울에도 여름에도 벗지 않았다.....이 복식은 요사하므로, 홍치 초시에 금지되었다."
Translation: Woven horsetails skirt started in Chosun (Korea) and flowed into the capital... By the end of the torch, many court officials were also wearing them. All of the corners were not taken off in the winter or in the summer.
In Ming dynasty, we wear马面裙 has no inner skirt, which is not puffy. 马尾裙, which is inner skirt that make outsider skirt puffy, we do not wear that in Ming dynasty. Even we wear inner skirt, it is not made of Woven horsetails and has nothing to do with korea.
[만포필기], 《寓圃笔记》:"发裙之制，以马尾编成，系于衬衣之内。体肥者一裙，瘦削者或二三，使外衣之张，俨若一伞。",
"치마를 넓히는 제도는, 말꼬리를 옷안에 엮어서 만든다. 몸을 비대하게 만든 하나의 치마로, 마른사람은 혹 두개 세개를 입는다, 옷을 바깥으로 넓게 퍼지게 만드는데 쓰는데, 우산과 같다."고 기록하고 있습니다.
Translation: The system for widening the skirt is made by woven horsetails into clothes. It is a skirt that makes the body enlarged, and the skinny person wears two or three lumps, and it is used to spread the clothes widely outside, and it is like an umbrella."
Are you kinding me, Hanfu in Ming dynasty do not use horsetails panty to enlarge the body, what we wear is 马面裙，not 马尾裙，马尾裙 made of woven horsetails is a kind of inner skirt.
That is all 高丽 clothes mentioned in these material, after translation, we can see that it has nothing to do with Ming dynasty clothes. In turn, it proves that hanbok in Joseon Dynasty was heavily influenced by China because it is totally different from Goryeo style.
but you south Korea is not 高丽, America founded your country, your country did not ever exist until 20th century.
@@明思卿 여러개의 중국 응원해! 니가 말한 티베트의 독립과 free 홍콩은 정말 감동적이야. 나중에 문자로 대자보 운동을 계획해보자!
I think china people have inferioty complex about Korean culture. I definitely like korean drama and their attitude. I used to live China and Korea both. But China people have very rude attitude over other country people. Also Korea is more clean and people are very nice
나르시스트ZH 김치국 김치어 특유의 치치치치치 짜 짜 짜 짜 짜 습니다습니다습니다가장시끄럽네🐸🐸🐸🥬🥬💩💩💩🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮kimchi國 kimchi pop kimchi語kimchi man最惡🤮 dog of USA all culture copy from China Japan or USA 中國附屬國 漢字 秋夕 儒家文化 傳統建築 筷子🥢 本草綱目 中醫藥 飲食文化 漢字專用語 韓服 端午節 日曜日 12節氣 風水 太極旗🇰🇷（copy from 中國太極圖）等等等等⋯⋯⋯all copy from China
KoSungJin 김치국 김치어 특유의 치치치치치 짜 짜 짜 짜 짜 습니다습니다습니다가장시끄럽네🐸🐸🐸🥬🥬💩💩💩🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮kimchi國 kimchi pop kimchi語kimchi man最惡🤮 dog of USA all culture copy from China Japan or USA 中國附屬國 漢字 秋夕 儒家文化 傳統建築 筷子🥢 本草綱目 中醫藥 飲食文化 漢字專用語 韓服 端午節 日曜日 12節氣 風水 太極旗🇰🇷（copy from 中國太極圖）等等等等⋯⋯⋯all copy from China
我是土生土长的马来西亚华人，我知道我的祖先是在战争的时候被逼到马来西亚当苦工的，之后就定居在马来西亚了，马来西亚保留了人很多中国的习俗和文化，除了汉服，在马来西亚基本没有多少人了解汉服，都是知道韩服和日本的和服，我也是到了中国留学才喜欢上汉服，了解了汉服，希望汉服可以一直流传下去。汉服也是很漂亮得而且历史更悠久的。希望汉服可以让更多人看到啊！
看到了，被韓國人竊取了
我也想不到以前作為我們的屬國，現在都這麼跳了。
傳播和繼承需要我們的努力！我家已經囤了很多漢服了，每年去國外旅遊都帶好幾套去。等疫情結束，我就可以穿漢服遊走東京街頭了⋯
马来西亚有汉服社了，好多华人参加这类活动
@@我是中华兔 我知道有一些 但是还是太少了 我身边是没有接触到啦
Fun fact: In China, people on Internet are getting used to use the country flag of korea to represent the verb "steal", for example: what a interesting meme, let me 【🇰🇷】it
一个连国旗都是由中国道教八卦图为元素设计的国家，文化不自信是正常的
that’s just racist
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why do you know so much about it !
太对了😂😂
评论区给爷整笑了，一个个复制粘贴啥呢这是，他们是有个组织还是都是机器人哦？
老饭圈了，毕竟拿得出手的只有偶像文化嘛
饭圈阴阳人鼻祖啦
老阴间复读机了😂
@JW Yoo oh thank you！ shame on you korea and Korean too～
@@hehe9226 pathetic life. keep it up!
史书有记载朝鲜王曾多次遣使向明朝廷请求赐予官服
我记得朝鲜官服等级是必须低于明朝官服二品的 在韩剧里，大明朝赐服朝鲜的桥段也不少吧？
Hanfu influenced hanbok from early time, since Tang, Song, Ming Dynasty
Costumes of Ming Dynasty influenced Korea / was awarded to Korea, which was a vassal region under Ming Dynasty.
The emperor of Ming welcomed Korean officials to visit Ming palace and learn Ming systems of all kinds, including Chinese characters, political system and costumes.
The emperor of Ming awarded costumes to Korea, and Korea took it as a honor, applying all kind of Ming systems to Korea.
A king of Korea said: ‘Korea is the good son while Japan is the evil son’, which was recorded in an ancient book.
This is the vassal relationship, which is why Ming Dynasty protected Korea from being invaded by Japanese.
If you want to see the true history, it’s all written in ancient books and antiques in the historical museums of all kinds. Even Korean ancient books are in Chinese. Korean people cannot see the true history without learning Chinese.
@@지구인-h3c 每个文明都有兴衰起伏的时候，重要的是有人为她努力复兴，朝鲜半岛自立国以来周遭强敌环伺，不是向强国臣服，就是被攻打占领。至今分裂只能充当殖民者的一粒棋子，和某些人一样已经快要忘记自己的历史了，可以理解
@@지구인-h3c what is ur point？
他们的建筑也是不能用明黄色
한국군 위안부 명성황후 강간 당하다 병자호란 남한산성 북한은 몽골, 위안 왕조, 중국 당나라, 명나라에 젊은 여성을 기부했습니다
I'm so worried. Hanbok is a symbol of democracy....is it real?? Then, Are you guys really okay?
They still have to pay their America dad and lick their boots
@@Littlewatermelon_Melons America is going to nuke your home lol
Taiwan no.1
Korea used to be a vassal country of China and Japan but now it’s part of the USA
@@Littlewatermelon_Melons ?? It’s doesn’t make sense
My question is Does Hanbok represent democracy? My Chinese friend was afraid of talking about Hanbok..
In every video about China and Japan, you will see Koreans in the comment section spreading hate and claiming cultures from these 2 countries. Ironically, Korea was ruled by both so it's obvious who's the liar.
J is in decline because of 嫌韓. It’s because 天 (heaven) abhors those who curse their parents.
한국은 일본을 좋아한다 근데 중국은 싫어해 😂 왜 착각속에 살아?
@@하이-m5m3s 위 글을 쓴 사람이 일본인입니다 (예전에도 대화했던). 저도 일본인 좋아합니다. 단지, 위 혐한글에 대해 답변을 달았을 뿐입니다. 일반 일본인과 극우 혐한 일본인은 구분을 하셔야 합니다.
@@random_guy1084 쟤 한국 관련된 영상이면 어딜가나 있던데 참 대단하다고 생각합니다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 인도 영상에도 가서 한국에서 인종차별 당했다는 썰 지어내던데 원래 저런 얘인가요?
@@하이-m5m3s 네, 맞습니다. 이곳에도 3년전부터 꾸준히 와서 한국 험담하는 혐한론자 입니다. 웃긴점은 한국에 너무 관심이 많다는 것입니다. 즉, 한국에 대한 콤플렉스를 한국에 대한 혐오로 나타내는 것이라 생각합니다.
Hanbok is korean
Kimchi is Korean
Hanfu is diffrent to hanbok
Hanfu is chinese
Paochai is Chinese
Agree
Wym u guys copy everything in other country
@@아기-j9u son is telling his mother that she looks like him, and that,s what u guys defining plagiarism.
@@加拿大の下饭菜 By seeing the attitude of China?
both hanbok and kimchi are copy of chinese hanfu and paocai, there are history record to prove this, pretty much everything in korea is copy from china
部分韩国人的素质简直了，po主都说了请相互尊重，还跑来攻击别人
众所周知，韩国是宇宙中心，万物皆由韩国发明，除了美国，因为美国是韩国爹。
对，他们先跑过来恶语伤人，真的无耻。
I met two Korean people in the Chinese restaurant in Japan. The restaurant was very small. They began to smoke and put their feet on the chair. They had no quality at all. I was also charged double for Korean food. The most important thing is that he served only one dish, and it was not finished.
喷他们就完事儿了
世人皆知他们连自己国家多少明星都不放过喷死多少，能不喷粪别人吗
好几个月了，韩国人还在复制粘贴，精神可嘉！
Hhhhh
kroea Comfort women also
hhhhh
spot on
To insult other countries with human suffering only makes you inhuman. Don't forget that your country was also a victim of war, and that fascist atrocities were also perpetrated in your country
Respect for clothing and culture is as important as respect for one's own history. It is an indisputable fact that China, as one of the four ancient civilizations, has a profound cultural accumulation. There is no need for us to steal other cultures because we have strong cultural confidence, and I hope you have the same in front of the screen.
@@temujinjeon1742 No matter which clansman becomes emperor, use Han language! Speak the Han language!
@JENNYLEEWORLD I don't know where you got that information! But what is the record of Korean history? Are there written records dating back more than 3,000 years? Chinese characters have a trend of development, from oracle to han Dynasty small seal script, evolution to the back of large seal script, regular script and so on! Korea has been enslaved by different countries throughout its history! How do you develop your own civilization?
@JENNYLEEWORLD Koreans seem to like making up shyt to support their perspectives. There are no archaeological or written records to support your opinion.
‘There is no need for us to steal other cultures’ lmaoo that’s basically what the whole world always did bro
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
2.7万个踩，偷国到底是花了多少钱，雇了多少人来刷啊？
@@ivyfu9296 国人好多用不了TH-cam
@@wendywang396 大陆翻墙的人少说也得有一亿
有组织的，而且官方默认。看数字就知道了。
@@ivyfu9296 為什麼要心痛？我覺得dislike 愈多愈代表韓國人的惱羞成怒，我們不需要花時間花心思在這小事上比拼
後亦多畜高麗美人, 大臣有權者, 輒以此遺之, 京師達官貴人, 必得高麗女, 然後爲名家. 自至正以來, 宮中給事使令, 大半高麗女, 以故四方衣服、靴帽、器物, 皆仿高麗, 擧世若狂.
- 續資治通鑒) 卷214, 원기(元紀) 32
以前没有什么感觉，现在真的感受到了为什么韩国叫“宇宙起源国”......整个宇宙都是韩国的，我那你点中国的东西怎么了^-^
我宇宙国仅疆域地图就是以银河系黑洞为中心的广域总星图。不知其中哪里有强词夺理，巧取豪夺之说？（保命）
Seong O Shim lmao, don’t say shits like this, u r making it sounds so funny.
@Seong O Shim In fact, we have been already modest. I don't think we are the center of the world,even though many countries are concerned. It's you who keep claiming that the Mid-Autumn Festival, hanfu,Qu Yuan and so on are your Korean.That's ridiculous.Since your history is shorter than ours, why not trace it to its source with a heart of learning?We never care what other countries get from us. Our only request is to respect history. Why close yourself off in your own world instead of listening to the history and world of others?But the Internet is grumpy. I don't ask you to understand my thoughts. Just stop trying to quibble with me. I don't have time for pointless conversations with you here. If you want to know the history, look it up. Keep pleasing yourself if you don't want to face it. It's simple.话说我都没发现我的赞这么多了。明明只是想来支持一下十音而已。超级不喜欢回复星人有点懵逼。明明只想安安静静地看视频发评论结果就被对线了。0.0
@Seong O Shim No Chinese said that! We did say we are arising but we are creating happiness by our own hands and have no intention to rob from others. Stop believing these lies which demonize Chinese for their own profits.
@Seong O Shim no idea what you are talking about.
说中国是韩国附属国那个，逗笑我了，天啊，韩国还没有中国一个省大
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈那好东西干嘛不留给自己。白菜都快吃不起了哈哈哈哈哈
和我们江苏省差不多 甚至要小一点
我表示，南朝鲜，跟我们中国重庆市差不多大，也就大那么一点点吧
真是怎么也没想到他们能自大到如此，无知到如此。
笑到我了，一句话就暴露自己文化，也不怕丢人。还附属国，真是没啥可说的只能乱说了
When people think about great, ancient civilizations they don't think about Korea. They think about China, Egypt, Maya, Greece, Rome. It's an insult to compare China and Korea in the same sentence.
We K people don’t care about how the world people think about K for ancient civilization. *We are interested in what the world thinks of us today.* The reason why it is important for us to make efforts to reveal the truth about ancient history is not to brag to the world, but to enable ourselves and East Asians to know their roots. In other worlds, efforts to understand ancient history correctly without distortion are for ourselves and East Asian people, not for the rest of the world.
C and J people are too much care about how the world see and think of them. Your comment also reflects that. C people look at everything (including culture and ancient history) from the perspective of profit and loss (利害得失). The reason C people extremely dislike K culture becoming world-famous is because they think it is a loss for them.
In my observation, among East Asians, only K people can study ancient history objectively based on facts without distortion, and can accept newly discovered ancient historical facts without hesitation even if they are against our national interests. C and J can never accept the new fact if it is against their national interests. This is because C people act based on profit and loss (得失), J people act based on harmony (服從, 和) within the established hierarchy, but K people value justice (義). That’s why C people cannot bear 不益 while K people cannot bear 不義. When it comes to ancient history also, C can never bear 不益. J people also can never say or accept the newly discovered truth if it is against their established national belief because 和(harmony) is more important than the truth for J people.
Ultimately, 天 blesses those who pursue justice and truth. According to [三國遺事], the founding ideology of Gojoseon was 弘益人間 which means *“widely benefit the human world”.* What a beautiful and philanthropic founding ideology suitable for the 21st century. All East Asians were born from K people, which means K people are their biological parents. *Everything is to be done as it is said: K people are parents and exist to widely benefit the human world.* That’s why getting closer to K and befriending K people bring blessings.
@@random_guy1084 They don't though.
这群韩国人是不是都高中没毕业啊。英文看不懂吗？
저를 포함한 대부분의 한국인들은 한푸를 한복이라고 생각하지 않습니다. 한푸를 한복이라고 착각하는 것은 소수의 한국인입니다.
泡菜和韩服是中国的，多么愚蠢啊。 你脑子受伤了吗？还是还在进化？
韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。
한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요
@@김준면개사랑함뒤질거 韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。
한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요
@@albertwong5031 고대 한국이 중국의 속국이었다는 것은 맞는 말이지만 한국도 한국만의 고유한 문화가 있었다.
문화대혁명때 다 태워버렸으니 ㅋㅋㅋ 남의꺼 뺏어서 지들꺼라고 우기는 수준 봐ㅠ 역사를 잊은 민족에겐 미래란 없다
No pls don't burnt it. Respect both Hanbok and Hanfu. They are totally a different thing if u read Korean and Chinese history
역사를배우지못하다니
전부사랑스런 고깃덩이로만들어주마
. 지크
@@이선영-v4s6x Chinese hanfu history is all true based on real artefacts and books wrote in the past by ancient people. So there is nothing for us to lie right?
@@다좡이 can't say that also. Both countries have their history. I am also planning to go Korea when Covid gets better to learn more about their history since many people now just mix China and Korea together and I don really like that
And I suggest you go museums in China to see it by yourself if you don't trust me.
我认为这个视频下面需要有更多汉字的评论，快要被韩文淹没了
上次说要为香港示威加油的是什么?
@@dandana14 nmsl
@@강성우-q8e 小心被当局逮住 / 工作一结束手机就销毁
@@강성우-q8e 我认为,为了摆脱中国的通信网,在韩国网站上用韩文进行民主化运动是非常好的。
@@강성우-q8e 你说得对,台湾和香港是中国独立的国家
韩国古书里只有"汉服"二字，从来没出现过"韩服"二字，说明韩国古人知道他们的服饰来自汉服，包括韩国古人描述他们新罗/高丽/朝鲜等时期的服饰时，都是用"中华制""唐风/唐国服/唐衣""悉同中国""上国同"等词语来描述，并且记载了中国各朝代给韩国各朝代的赐服， 请大家了解古代韩国服饰都是从中国传过去的，即使赐服给韩国，也是中国服饰，不是赐给韩国就可以称韩服，《高丽史·舆服志》："东国自三韩仪章服饰循习土风，至新罗太宗王请袭唐仪，是后冠服之制稍拟中华"。《燃藜室记述》冠服条："吾东自三国以来，冠服皆循土风。新罗武烈王法唐制，仪章服饰稍拟中华"，贞观二十二年（649），新罗道臣入唐，学习汉制。《新罗本纪》记载：“春秋又请改其章服，以从中华制。”新罗真德王"请袭唐仪"，唐太宗赐新罗衣冠，文武王“又革妇人之服，自此已后，衣冠同于中国”。《新罗本纪》“真德王三年正月，始服中朝衣冠”。 早期王氏高丽时期:高丽王健:"惟我东方旧慕唐风，文物礼乐悉尊其制"。《宣和奉使高丽图经》描写高丽衣冠制度“遵我宋之制度焉”。《高丽史》“三十二年六月，宋神宗赐衣二对”等。元朝时高丽穿胡服，所以高丽末期请求明朝赐服:《高丽史·舆服志》:事元以来，开剃辫发、袭胡服，殆将百年。及大明太祖高皇帝赐恭愍王冕服，王妃、群臣亦皆有赐，自是衣冠文物焕然复新，彬彬乎古矣"。《明史·舆服志》:洪武二年，高丽入朝，请赐祭服制度，命制给之”。高丽国王及世子冕服、王妃翟衣的沿用及改革，就是以明朝所赐章服为基础。自此高丽开始依照明朝衣制从上而下改革。 李氏朝鲜按照明制汉服进行服饰改革，下令“复行洪武年号,袭大明衣冠、禁胡服"，频繁朝贡赐服让朝鲜衣冠和“上国同”，朝鲜人崔溥《漂海录》提到:“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国” 朝鲜文人徐居正诗云“明皇若问三韩事，衣冠文物上国同” 李氏朝鲜《成宗实录》:"吾东方自箕子以来，教化大行，男有烈士之风，女有贞正之俗，史称小中华”。
@@cosmob9602 中国自隋唐以来就开始了民族大融合，现在哪里还有纯正血统的汉人，自隋唐以来，中国的汉人，就已经不是之前的汉人了，都是胡人和汉人的融合，胡人指得就是匈奴、鲜卑、羯、氐、羌，比如说我，是蒙古族和满族以及汉族的结合，而我们每个民族都认为对汉服文化做出了贡献，这才有了现在的汉服，所以现在的新汉人的祖先不应该单纯的只有汉人，也应该有胡人。
@@cosmob9602 中国自隋唐以来就开始了民族大融合，现在哪里还有纯正血统的汉人，自隋唐民族大融合以来，中国的汉人，就已经不是之前的汉人了，都是胡人和汉人的融合，胡人指得就是匈奴、鲜卑、羯、氐、羌，比如说我，我是蒙古族和满族以及汉族的结合，而我们每个民族都认为对汉服文化做出了贡献，这才有了现在的汉服，而不同朝代有不同朝代的服饰，所以现在的中国人的基因上除了汉人基因，也有胡人基因，我不知道你说汉服不是汉人做的是什么意思，建议你去了解一下汉服的演变史，殷商后，冠服制度初步建立，西周时，服饰制度逐渐形成。，汉代秦之初至东汉明帝时期，服饰端庄、典雅，魏晋轻灵飘逸、仙气飘飘，唐制汉服，雍容华贵，宋制汉服含蓄简约，明制汉服优雅大方。
@@cosmob9602 这就是汉服，如果你认为它只是概念，那么我的祖先穿的是什么呢？古画中记载了我们祖先的服饰，这个博主其他视频里也介绍了，如果你想了解的话，就去看一下这个博主的其他视频。
@@cosmob9602 看来你还是不太了解我们国家的文化，这个up主展示的是纯正的汉服，我出生在中国的内蒙古，我们的少数民族服饰叫蒙古袍，和汉服完全是两个概念，如果你想了解的话，你可以去搜索一下蒙古袍。我们56个民族都有各自的衣服，和汉族是完全不同的。而这个博主其他视频展示的确确实实都是汉服，因为在油管我很少看到有人展示除了汉服以外的其他中国少数民族的衣服。
@@cosmob9602 中国每个少数民族都有各自的服饰，蒙古族的叫蒙古袍，满族的服饰叫旗袍，还有回族服饰，等等我就不一一列举了，还有汉服的各个朝代的服饰，这个博主展示的视频确实都是汉服，你和我谈论我们民族的服饰之前最起码应该做些了解，不能把汉服和其他少数民族的衣服混淆，当然我们所有民族加起来的文化，才使得我们华夏文明更加多姿多彩。
공자 태공망이 한국인이라고 배운 적 한번도 없고 중국인이라는 걸 다 알고있다. 왜곡된 사실 퍼트려서 한국 이미지 망치는게 대국인가 적당히해라
@천하태평 어떤 한국인? 솔직히 말해서 공자랑 태공망 학교에서도 비중있게 배우지 않고 관심 밖의 인물이다
@천하태평 한국인 누가 그런 말을 하고다니는데 ㅋㅋ 제발 니네 뇌내망상은 뇌속에서만 하라규
@@nyunimoo2428 굳이 있냐고 물으면 환빠들이 그런 주장을 하긴 했지만 지금은 사실상 보기 어렵고, 시작은 넷우익들이 우스갯소리로 하던걸 몇몇 놈들이 번역해서 지랄했을 뿐, 저분들 머릿속엔 한국인이 공자도 한국인이다 이지랄 하는걸로 세뇌교육 받았을텐데 뭐...
@천하태평 도대체 어느 한국인이 그렇게 말했다는거지? 날조하지마세요. 당장에 중학교 교과서만 봐도 공자 같은 중국위인들 다 중국인이라고 배우고 시작합니다
@천하태평 중학교 교과서를 사진이라도 찍어줘야 믿어? 제발 혼자서 상상하지마라
근데 중국인 유투브 왜함?
중국이 민주화운동을 추진하려나봅니다 우리 그들을 응원해요
외국사는 중국인인데 정부가 돈주는듯 중국역사 알리라고
@@smmin6083 你们所谓的民主就是当人民被财阀压在脚下的时候，政府连屁都不敢放一个，却忙着向美国摇尾巴嘛？也是，毕竟是韩国人自己愿意这样，应该也算是民主。
@@smmin6083 韩国被美国殖民
@@nififine9511 그니까 중국인들이 민주주의를 보여달라니까?! 한국 보다 잘하는지 당장 중국의 민주주의 모습을 보여줘!
朱元璋:“中国之君，以力服之者有焉，以德怀之者有焉；如高丽之奸顽，德不能怀，惟威之畏，故前人以力得之。”
不学中国字，所以连历史也不懂
韩国人应该看不懂这段🤣
有翻译棒子都不懂
还是老祖宗看的清楚，对付这帮贱人就不能用德，就该像美国人一样对待他们
Korean could never know what the really history is, because their acient history books are written in Chinese.
Koreans hope China can make freedom for Taiwan, Mongolians, Tibetan, Hongkong, Joseon tribes for respect their owned history and culture peace of world
You speak English so Do you think you are UK,
@@666Yourkarma As a vassal state of China and Japan in history, Korean should make themselves free from USA nowadays. As for the hope about Taiwan, Tibetan..., you could fignt and win a total war against China then your dream will come true. You delusional clown. XD
@@666Yourkarma I speak English because Eng is international language. But Korean use Chinese in histroy because Korean is one of China's vassal state and Korean have no their own language before 15 century.
@@nokoxia6413 Korea spoke Chinese because Chinese was international language. But Chinese use English in History because China is one of the vassal states united 56 tribes. And Korean have owned language what was Mandarin. we created Korean 700years ago biologically because Mandarin was hieroglyphics uncomfortably because many primitive people created and mixed too many ways by too many ancient people
让我说个笑话 儿子生了爸爸
哈哈哈
嚯 押韵的
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
hhhhhhhhhhh
한국은 민주화 운동 때마다 한복을 입었습니다.
즉, 한복은 민주화 운동의 상징입니다. 당신은 중국의 민주화를 원하고 있군요.
BTS도 한복이 한국의 전통의상이라며 뮤직비디오를 촬영했습니다.
당신은 BTS의 팬들을 무시하고 있군요.
Korea wore Hanbok for every pro-democracy movement.
Hanbok is a symbol of democratic movements. You want China to be democratized.
BTS also filmed the music video, saying Hanbok is a traditional Korean costume.
You're ignoring BTS fans.
니들은 중국 한족 옷을 입어서 청와대로 들어가고 시위하고 나서 주권 나라가 될거야.
你们穿上汉服，去青瓦台示威，也可以成为一个有主权的国家。
North Korean also wear hanbok, North Korea is a democratic country!
North Korean also wear hanbok, North Korea is a democratic country!
@@suiyy4164 ?? 인민복말하는거냐? 니네처럼 공산국가도 아닌데 왜 입음?
@@andreagarrison8838 North korea is not south korea they are similar of east germany and west germany so,they are diffrent each other
China should open its market economy to foreign countries first and enter TH-cam.
중국은 자국시장경제 먼저 100% 외국에 개방하고 유튜브에 진출하시기 바랍니다.
china should ban import from korea. and let them know who's their real dad
首尔大学 一篇题目为고려(高丽) 국왕(国王)과 관리(官吏)의 복식(服飾)이 반영(反应)하는
국가(国家) 위상(位相)과 자의식(自意识)의 변동(变动)的论文提到了这段文字 且翻译成韩文: "조선에서 관복 제도의 격을 명의 제도에 비해 2단계 낮춘 것은 1370년에 명에
서 고려의 관리에게 사여한 제복 규정에 근거한 것이다. 당시 명에서는 중국의 9등(九等) 관제에 견주어 두 등급을 낮추어 사여하였다.50)50)그리고 20여년 뒤 조선에서는 이에 근거하여 관리의 공복 제도를 정하였다. 이와 같은 원리는 이후에 성립한 복식 제도에도 적용되었다. 제복 제도 역시 명에서 고려를 2등급 체강하여 왕국 7등으로 규정한 사례에 근거하여 제정되었다.
@@minus21334 anyone can't understand it, idiot..
@@minus21334
한글은 잘쓰면서 왜 검색을 할줄 모르세요?
아니면 그정도로 페쇠적인가?
넉흭낙락는 정말 믹폑국익약~~
해석해봐~~
한글 열심히 배운거 아니야?
History needs to be straightened out.
Hanbok is a symbol of national independence, freedom,
democracy, and democracy.
(역사는 똑바로 알아야 합니다.
한복은 민족독립자유민주주의민주주의 상징입니다. )
I support China's democracy. Fighting!!
(중국의 민주주의를 응원합니다. 파이팅!!)
@san jack 우리나라는 우리가 알아서 할께ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@san jack 중국인에 의한 강간이 더 걱정스러운데. 니들은 타인이 죽거나 강간당하는건 방관하는 나라잖아
Everyone know that chinese cultures spread globaly...i'm from indonesia no doubt might be immigrant from ancient china bring hanfu influent to korean clothing...korean netizen must googling their history because they are not that long comparing china history....
There are so many this kind of rhetoric here such as "I'm Vietnamese and we admit great C influence, I'm Japanese and we admit great C influence... Try to search Goguryeo murals and see Hanbok there. Just as Xianbei, Mongols, Manchus had their own cultures and clothing styles even though they were geographically closer to China, and they culturally influenced China a lot, Koreans also had their own cultures and clothing styles since very ancient times (far before AD). Chinese mainly started to influence the neighboring regions far later since Tang/Song periods.
korea just making gimmick for effort co'z famous kpop globally
@@random_guy1084 Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷： AD 1897
“我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可"
“우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다”
2.2 History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392
“復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服”
“병오 다시 홍무(洪武) 연호를 시행하였고, 명(明)의 의관을 이어 사용하였으며, 호복(胡服)을 금지하였다.”(朝鲜现代语翻译）
3. Taejo of Goryeos' Ten Rules 왕이 훈요10조를 내리다 高麗太祖 訓要十條: AD 943
"惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉"
“우리 동방(東方)은 옛날부터 중국의 풍속[唐風]을 흠모하여 문물(文物)과 예악(禮樂)이 다 그 제도를 따랐으나, 지역이 다르고 인성(人性)도 각기 다르므로 꼭 같게 할 필요는 없다. 거란(契丹)은 짐승과 같은 나라로 풍속이 같지 않고 말도 다르니 의관제도(衣冠制度)를 삼가 본받지 말라”
5.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀) : AD 648
“春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製”
“춘추가 또한 장복(章服)을 고쳐서 중국의 제도에 따를 것을 청하자”
4.Samguk Sagi Volumn 5『삼국사기』권5 『三國史記』卷5 : AD 649
“(真德王) 三年,春正月，始服中朝衣冠”
“(진덕왕) 3년(649) 봄 정월에 비로소 중국의 의관(衣冠)을 착용하였다”
So what you try to say?
Hanbok is Chinese or Korean cloth?
韩国政府申遗中国文化 也是为了💰
문화 대혁명때 다 불타 없어진 역사밖에 없는 것들이 역사를 파고드ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
그니까욬ㅋㅋㅋ 뭐 내세울것도 없으니 뺏어오자라는 심보 ㅋㅋㅋ
ㄹㅇ 자기거 다 부숴버리고 뭐 하나 밀어볼려하니 없으니깐 남의거 도적질하는중 ㅋㅋ
@@Sean-gio2 속국이던때는 느그 한족나라가 아니라 몽골족 나라라고 ㅋㅋ
@@Sean-gio2 진짜 역사 1도 모르네 무식이 죄는 아니지만 자랑할 것도 아니다.
@@Sean-gio2 홍길동이냐 여기저기 뿅뿅 복붙하고 다니게ㅋㅋㅋ
评论区咋回事儿……说不过理就拿VPN说事儿 承认历史很难吗？？？
Cathy H 他们没有历史可说，而且也看不懂自己的历史。所以为黑而黑，真的很低级无耻～让他们评论吧，越评论这个视频热度越高，十音的科普会被更多人看到！
都是复制粘贴的一模一样的还能指望狗嘴里吐出什么象牙
就是不想承认错误呗，不是说vpn就是说中国人各种不好。真的，用英文怼他们怼的我都词穷了。
而且争论水平很低，用一些很无聊的小学生论点企图激怒中国人。仔细一想难用这些话骂韩国真能戳中韩国人G点？
@@noctislee598 韩国人g点是真的低，拿历史上的人尽皆知的历史来黑，笑死我了，不会以为韩国历史没黑暗面吧？关键是我们书里都学过的，搞得和他们有什么关系一样？中国历史的敌人一直是北方游牧民族，韩国一个半岛小国也出来跳，真是迷之自信
历史不是自己说什么就是什么，还是要有考据的，比如说地底下出土的文物，史书的记载。请问韩国朋友有实证吗？
我最服韩国人说元朝鲜人被画到清明上河图里面
顶上去
他们当然没有，不然怎么只靠一张嘴叭叭
@사이버수사대 What does that have to do with anything? So you agree hanbok originated from hanfu then?
@사이버수사대 哈哈哈哈 你们自己都是个被美国殖民的国家 还要给美国交军费 先管好自己吧 中国可是个独立自主不受外部势力控制的自由国家哦 你们太可怜了 古代被中国统治 近代被日本统治 现在还是逃不过被殖民的命运
I saw a comment on a Hanfu video claiming that they're copying the Hanbok. I thought of writing a history lesson, but decided to just dislike the comment instead. As a Scandinavian, the three countries all have similar cultures, languages and traditions, but no one would claim that one of us is the original. There were Vikings in Norway, Denmark and Sweden. They were all distinct and separate from each other. When you think of a Viking you think of raids and wariors and not traders and explorers, which majority were. Norwegians and Danes were the raiding types, but only during dire need. Swedish vikings explored and traded and established what is now Russia. That is a historic fact. Russians on the other hand denies vikings ever being in Russia.
China has been a thriving culture thousands of years before the Kingdom of Korea was established. Sure, there lived people on the peninsula, but they had no influense over a well estabished culture such as China was at that time.
Being influensed by your neighbours is perfectly fine. After all, it's them you have the closest bond with. Cultural exchange is vitally important still today. We give and take from each other and expand our cultures to become better. Chinese and Korean cultures, clothes and languages blended over thousands of years. But that doesn't mean that one is owned by the other or that one is a copy of the other. It's same same, but different. Just like Scandinavian nations are very similar in most ways, we're still distinctly different, have our own history and culture apart from the others.
It just saddens me that people, in this day of unlimted access to information, still make baseless claims because of their feelings and beliefs. Just because you believe it to be true, doesn't make it fact. But that is, unfortunately, the human condition.
Thanks for speaking out! Also sharing the history of your people, I know bit more about Vikings now lol
I am studying abroad at Copenhagen University now. Viking culture is fascinating. Before coming to Scandinavia, I could never imagine that I had such a big misunderstanding (or basically ignorance) about Viking civilization. I am now interested in these cultural histories and would love to share my own Chinese culture, or the culture of any of my East Asian neighbors. I have a Japanese flatmate and three European flatmates, and we get along very well.
没见过说爷爷像孙子的
描述的真确切
韩国历史是用汉字记载的，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法的原件是用汉字写的，明明就是中国的文化属国。😅说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。
한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。😅아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요
搞笑 那爷爷 有多少个孙子
中国56个民族 都称为汉族文化的话 越南，日本，俄罗斯，印度，欧洲 全当孙子吗 无理取闹! 想支持 资本主义， 来啊 怎么羡慕的不得了吧 哈哈哈😄
对了 不是你们 禁止 TH-cam 了吗? 能在这儿 说话吗?
@@albertwong5031 你的知识是在哪里学的。한국은 중국의 속국이 아닙니다. 한글이 만들어지기 전에는 한자를 사용하기는 하였지만 엄연히 중국과 표기법이 달랐습니다. 제대로 된 상식을 가지고 이야기를 해주었으면 좋겠습니다. 그리고 오랜 세월 동안 한복과 김치는 한국의 전통 문화로 인정 받아 왔습니다. 단 한번도 전 세계인들에게 중국의 것이라고 인정 받은적이 없죠. 실제로도 중국의 것이 아니고요. 왜 갑자기 한복과 김치를 중국의 것이라고 우기는지 이해가 되지 않습니다. 당신들의 후세대들이 잘못된 역사 의식을 가지지 않도록 지금부터라도 제대로 된 역사를 알려주길 바랍니다.
₩uhan V!rus is only yours. 👌
提到韩国有的而中国没有的，我第一个想到的是美国大兵，这个确实是韩国的一个特色，韩国人可以发展一下“美国驻军文化”，树立自己的文化自信🤣😂
Its very stupid for China to say hanbok and kimchi are Chinese all of sudden in 2020 while China had their mouth shut for past centuries. 🤣🤣
Maybe they got jealous cuz of K culture and K Pop being famous
@@padeng555 古代模仿中国 现代照搬欧美, 这可能就是你们的南韩传统吧
Ancient imitation of China modern copy of Europe and the United States, this may be your South Korean tradition
@san jack so you are saying that China always steal others culture right?
Agree 👍 👍
@san jack 불쌍한 중국은 자기의 문화가 없어 남에 문화를 훔치려 합니다!
露奶装中国也没有啊。绝对的韩国特色。
그나저나 니네 유튜브 해도 되는거냐?
对老子来说就是一按钮的事情，所以别狗叫了
유튜브할 수있다는거 처음 알았지
有文化和素质的中韩两国人民，其实是非常友好的。我的几个韩国同学曾经就说，他们非常清楚如今传统韩服的前身底色是“大明赐服“，但随着时间的流逝，渐渐地融入了古朝鲜的部分特色。当然我说的这部分韩国人是极少数，大部分韩国人罔顾事实，被韩国狭隘的历史教育洗脑，居然反过来说是大明学习了李氏朝鲜的服饰，不然你觉得所有的华人为什么生气？中国怎么不去说和服是自己的？因为日本人至少在这一点上大方承认，和服脱胎于中国吴服，但后来自成体系，当得上是日本文化。就好比日本人说，大唐是去日本学了文化，不可笑吗？景福宫按照史料记载，李氏王朝得到大明的钦定才有资格开建，而且规格形制仅仅是大明郡王级别，不承认有用吗？从来就是中国的附属国，直到大清衰弱了才独立出去，不承认有用吗？
有用，因为每个国家都是傻子底层占大多数，他们不需要思考，只需要接受信息，有凝聚力就行了，谁管那么多?
韓文留言真的刷新我的印象..
真的...无理取闹且无聊
都懒得去翻译一个一个人看 猜都知道只会抓着什么vpn哔哩吧啦的
@Daniel Shin korea too
@Daniel Shin Do you know who cares the most about other's thoughts - when pets looking for the owner’s approval
중국인들아 치파오가 부끄러워?
Nope that’s part of cultures too, and We respect all the culture and traditions we have!
旗袍只是我们众多传统服装中的一种没人不承认哦无知小儿，该不会有人以为我们超过五千年的历史只穿旗袍吧？不会吧不会吧？不会有人这么没文化吧？
@@hanzhang2872 人民愚蠢到不能成为一个大国，而土地太大而不能成为一个小国。 因此，这个国家被称为中国。 但是，即使被称为中国也是不合适的，原因是人的水平低于平均水平。
@@kylaleehyun 值得高兴的是，中国是一个有历史有文化有底蕴的堂堂正正的国家，而韩国，或许我应该称呼为南朝鲜？或者朝鲜？我不知道，这实在是令人感到遗憾。
@@user-rt7ic3ps3n 중국이 쓸데없는 짓도 하지만 한국을 위해서 하는일도 있어요
존낰ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 웃음벨임?ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
그냥 웃으면 됨?ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
영어를 알아들어?
The national flag of South Korea was invented by China
댓글을 남긴 중국인들아
위구르인들이 어떻게 탄압받았는지 알고 싶다고 한국말로 댓글을 남겨주었구나 !!🥰
중국 한푸 문화를 좋아해 주셔서 감사합니다
ㄹㅇ 깔갈깔ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 중국인들 ㅈㄴ 진지한거 유우머 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
What's scary is that there are many Chinese who support Korea and Koreans on the matter. Mainly because they are fans of K-pop, K-dramas, or they are dating/married to Koreans.
Don't be scared. They will be blessed if they support K and K people. This is my sincere and serious advice.
@@random_guy1084 So should Koreans support Chinese people and culture. EVERYONE SHOULD SUPPORT EVERY CULTURE!
Im Nagalim this Korean are crazy
can i follow you in Instagram?
I said I wanted a logical discussion in this video, so I don't have any expectations, but I'll give it a try. In other Chinese videos, they just deleted my comment.
First, it is influenced but interactive.
Hanbok and Hanfu have different roots. Hanbok is based on the clothing of the northern equestrian people, and Hanfu is based on the clothing of the southern settled people. Accordingly, China's Hanfu was also a form in which men also wore skirts in the ancient era, but in the 3rd century BC, under the influence of Hufu, they began to wear pants. There is a record in the Jaji Tonggam that while King Jo Muryeong was enforcing the ban on wearing trousers, Chinese society vehemently rejected it, calling it barbarian culture.
Additionally, due to frequent exchanges with Joseon during the Ming Dynasty, similar cultures often appear. To conclude, the Ming Dynasty clothing that is suggested to be similar to Hanbok, which China claims to be an imitation of Hanbok, is Goryeo style brought over from Goryeo.
The Hanfu of the Yuan Ming Dynasty was greatly influenced by the Hanbok from the late Goryeo Dynasty to the early Joseon Dynasty due to the influence of the Goryeo style that was popular during the Yuan Dynasty, and Chinese historical materials such as Sokjachi Tonggam also record that Chinese clothing during that period was influenced by the Goryeo style. In other words, it is not that Hanfu from the Ming Dynasty came over and became Hanbok, but rather, Hanbok came over and changed Hanfu into the way it was during the Ming Dynasty. In addition, Danryeong, which was given and maintained by the Ming imperial family, is a costume that originated in the West and spread through China.
Of course, a lot of Chinese culture and clothing were imported to the Korean Peninsula, and Tang Dynasty clothing was adopted as royal clothing by most countries in East Asia. Han Chineseists ignore the history of the introduction of Goryeo style clothes and claim that Goryeo style hanfu is an independent Han clothing, was influenced by the Tang Dynasty, or that Ming Dynasty Hanfu influenced Hanbok. However, according to common sense, if Koryo-style hanfu was the unique cultural attire of the Han people, there was no reason for the Ming royal family to ban it by edict, saying, "This is not a Chinese custom."
Also, influence is overinterpreted. Just because a country has been influenced by it, the clothing and culture of that country cannot all become imitations. The fact that ancient Japan's clothing was so strongly influenced by Baekje's clothing that it was worn directly from Baekje is also described in a number of Japanese records, such as Nihon Shoki and Shangfu Ryuki. However, that does not mean that kimono is collectively called hanbok. In other words, culture is not imperialism that takes over each country. Cultures are transmitted, merge, or coexist.
In a similar case, Neo-Confucianism was strongly influenced by Buddhism in India and Nepal. However, it is the same as saying that Neo-Confucianism is the Buddhist ideology of India and Nepal.
Second, the traditional clothing of the Korean people does not represent the entire hanbok.
Based on the Korean-Chinese hanbok, it can be said that the Korean-Chinese hanbok exists in Chinese traditional clothing. However, it is incorrect to interpret the Hanbok of the Korean people as one of Chinese costumes.
In the past, China used the ethnic Koreans to carry out the Northeast Project to intentionally deny the history of Goguryeo and Balhae, that is, Korean history, and reduce them to a minority in China. Of course, it is not currently underway, but the problem is that in the private sector, Chinese people still cite studies from the Northeast Project and provide incorrect information to foreign sites and foreigners.
In this situation, Hanbok is shown to foreigners and, without any further explanation, they say, “Because there are Korean-Chinese people, it is a traditional Chinese costume.” If so, even in the private sector in Korea, it is inevitable to receive fierce criticism, such as "China's influence and subcategories are often emphasized without any historical context."
In order for China to call the Korean-Chinese and Hanbok traditional clothing, it must recognize Hanbok as Korea's unique clothing. Korea is a different country from China, Hanbok is Korea's unique traditional costume inherited from northern nomadic peoples, and the Hanbok worn by Korean-Chinese people is also a traditional costume derived from Korea's Hanbok. This must be explained in advance to avoid 'misunderstandings'.
In conclusion, although it is true that China has had a great influence on East Asia, it is only at the level of “influence.” The influence of western regions such as the Hobok of the northern nomadic tribes, Korea's Goryeo Yang, and Central Asia and India on China cannot be ignored. Claiming that another country's culture is one's own based on cross-cultural influence is simply a claim that causes discomfort in the country in question.
This is also true in other cultures. In the case of European traditional clothing, after the fall of Western Rome, Gothic clothing was popular, and then through Southern Europe and France, at one time even Turkish and Persian clothing were popular, and now they are wearing suits originating from England, and these past clothing are their own unique style. I do not claim that it is the culture and clothing of . By this logic, Chinese culture was also influenced by Korea, so it would be meaningless to argue that Chinese culture is a part of Korean culture.
Incidentally, Hanfu is a traditional Chinese clothing. However, the modern Hanfu popular in China is not traditional Chinese clothing.
The reason is simple. In fact, Hanfu was fused with the clothing of the Manchu people, and has been passed down to modern times under the name of cheongsam.
The Chinese claim that the cheongsam is the clothing of the Manchu people, and that the original Chinese clothing was hanfu. This is no different from cultural imperialism. Culture does not move towards an imperialistic form as the Chinese claim. They fuse together and develop in a better direction.
Hanbok developed into its modern form through exchanges with various cultures, including Hanfu and Kimono. Even if we study Goguryeo clothing now and wear it again, it is bound to be reinterpreted in a new form. This is because we do not even know how people wore clothes during the Goguryeo period. In other words, you are wearing a newly created costume rather than a traditional costume.
It is correct to see Hanfu as a reinterpretation of the Hanfu wearing movement that is popular in modern China. I don't even know how to wear Hanfu, so isn't it inevitable that it will have to be reinterpreted? It even looks different from the Hanfu of the past. To be exact, it is closer to Hanbok. If you deny the entire cheongsam, the unique beauty of hanfu mixed in it will also disappear, and then people will try to take a part of it from hanbok that looks similar. Then it has no choice but to resemble hanbok.
Considering that China's Hanfu wearing movement also took place after the popularity of K-pop and Korean dramas, we can see that Hanfu = Hanbok was an unreasonable claim due to China's cultural inferiority complex.
In other words, the reality of Hanfu is a fake that is completely different from the Hanfu of the past, and is a newly created costume in modern times. Just because the name is borrowed from tradition does not mean it is a traditional costume. In other words, Hanbok can be listed as a UNESCO cultural heritage, but Hanfu cannot.
China needs to love its traditional culture. Cheongsam is a unique Chinese traditional culture that was passed down through the fusion of Manchurian clothing and Hanfu during the Qing Dynasty. Now, denying the cheongsam and insisting on Hanfu is in fact denying their own history of the Qing Dynasty and Hanfu, and in conclusion, they cannot help but fall into the same contradiction as denying the entire history of China.
Considering these circumstances, it is highly likely that China's cultural misunderstandings and misconceptions will strengthen its negative influence on Korea. In reality, it is only worsening the feelings of each country, and China's external image is worsening. On the contrary, in the process of fighting like this, Hanbok becomes more famous.
Lastly, it occurred to me, but I hope that no one appears who says, ‘Both cheongsam and hanfu are Chinese.’ As explained above, Hanfu cannot be revived in modern times. Hanfu already exists under the name of cheongsam, so how can it be revived? It is impossible to resurrect a living person. This kind of behavior is no different from a child throwing a tantrum and claiming that everything is his or hers. Simply put, that is cultural imperialism.
In the past, there was a saying like this in Joseon. “The territory is too large to be called a small country, and the mind is too narrow to be called a great country, so it is called China.” It's natural, but it's extremely wrong to say and do, and I really hate this. So don't let me get to the horrible reality that these words were true. I want to like China.
아 오해가 있으시군요.
그 수치스럽지 않으세요?
남의꺼 뺏기나 하고
그 가오세던 명나라는 어디가고.
이런데서 한국의 문화나 훔치고
미국도 안하는짓을 중국이 하는게
@Maatje Benassi we are saying ours what is ours you are saying yours what is not yours
@Maatje Benassi 그건 니네 입장이고 중국아
짝퉁의나라 중국이라ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
문화도 짝퉁으로 쓰려는듯
@@드피트-x5y ㅋㅋㅋ
ㄹㅇㅋㅋ ㅇㅈ
@주원 Sounds like you are talking about Koreans in the comments section.
한푸가 한복을 따라해 만든거란다.
한복이 너희꺼라는 고증을 통해
진정 너희것인지 확인해 보는게 좋겠다만
뭐가 있어야 증명이라도 할텐데
없는걸로 증명이 되겠니.
거기다 너희는 너희의 역사마저
부정하는 안타까운 민족이라 마음이 아프다.
우리 대한민국의 한복을 좀 설명하자면
우리의 한이 들어있는 의복이지.
아주 고대부터 백성의 민주 의지가 담긴 옷이란다.
근래에는 3.1운동으로 일본에 독립을 이뤄내었던 그 순간에도 한복은 함께 였단다.
한복은 한민족의 민주화를 상징하는 전통적이고 역사적인 옷이다.
한복은 자유의지가 한으로 녹여든 진정한 민주의지가 각인된 옷이다.
너희는 이것을 본받고자 한것이라고 생각한다.
한복을 통한 너희의 민주화를 응원한다.
How funny， Please take a look at the history and find out that Hanfu is plagiarizing Hanfu, then what you are talking about here is bullshit
你们韩国人在学校不都要学写中文的吗?不然你写中文吧，要不然没人理你
@@ziyanwang2592 謝謝。你給我發地個人信息我讀得很好。 中國共產主義問題好嚴重啊。 支持你的計劃！ 而且你給我發的個人信息已經安全刪除，不用擔心。
We didn't say that hanbok is hanfu, But hanfu is not hanbok please don't say that Hanfu originated from hanbok, which is very ignorant and ridiculous.
부디 너는 너의 국가의 역사를 잘 읽기를 바란다, 도둑질은 너의 장성이다, 빨리 가서 공부하고, 그리고 너의 작은 입을 다물기를 바란다.
古朝鮮連自己的文字沒有，到了快近代才自創文字系統，可是系統漏洞很多，文字沒有含義，只是代表讀音。就像用漢語拼音或注音來當文字使用。
韩文还是逃脱不了方块字的构架
안녕? 중국의 개
@@kandad8340 东夷和你们有什么关系，东夷在山东境内，箕子只是将中国文化带去朝鲜，你真以为你们和东夷是同族同源？你不会看你们国家野史看多真以为汉字是你们发明的吧？
尚書大傳·卷二》記載：「武王釋箕子之囚，箕子不忍周之釋，走之朝鮮。武王聞之，因以朝鮮封之箕子。」
都邑华夏，东西二京。
背邙面洛，浮渭据泾。
宫殿盘郁，楼观飞惊。
图写禽兽，画彩仙灵。
丙舍旁启，甲帐对楹。
肆筵设席，鼓瑟吹笙。
升阶纳陛，弁转疑星。
右通广内，左达承明。
既集坟典，亦聚群英。
杜稿钟隶，漆书壁经。
府罗将相，路侠槐卿。
户封八县，家给千兵。
高冠陪辇，驱毂振缨。
世禄侈富，车驾肥轻。
策功茂实，勒碑刻铭。
磻溪伊尹，佐时阿衡。
奄宅曲阜，微旦孰营。
桓公匡合，济弱扶倾。
绮回汉惠，说感武丁。
俊义密勿，多士实宁。
晋楚更霸，赵魏困横。
假途灭虢，践土会盟。
何遵约法，韩弊烦刑。
起翦颇牧，用军最精。
宣威沙漠，驰誉丹青。
九州禹迹，百郡秦并。
岳宗泰岱，禅主云亭。
雁门紫塞，鸡田赤诚。
昆池碣石，钜野洞庭。
旷远绵邈，岩岫杳冥。
治本于农，务兹稼穑。
俶载南亩，我艺黍稷。
税熟贡新，劝赏黜陟。
孟轲敦素，史鱼秉直。
庶几中庸，劳谦谨敕。
聆音察理，鉴貌辨色。
贻厥嘉猷，勉其祗植。
省躬讥诫，宠增抗极。
殆辱近耻，林皋幸即。
两疏见机，解组谁逼。
索居闲处，沉默寂寥。
求古寻论，散虑逍遥。
欣奏累遣，戚谢欢招。
渠荷的历，园莽抽条。
枇杷晚翠，梧桐蚤凋。
陈根委翳，落叶飘摇。
游鹍独运，凌摩绛霄。
耽读玩市，寓目囊箱。
易輶攸畏，属耳垣墙。
具膳餐饭，适口充肠。
饱饫烹宰，饥厌糟糠。
亲戚故旧，老少异粮。
妾御绩纺，侍巾帷房。
纨扇圆洁，银烛炜煌。
昼眠夕寐，蓝笋象床。
弦歌酒宴，接杯举觞。
矫手顿足，悦豫且康。
嫡后嗣续，祭祀烝尝。
稽颡再拜，悚惧恐惶。
笺牒简要，顾答审详。
骸垢想浴，执热愿凉。
驴骡犊特，骇跃超骧。
诛斩贼盗，捕获叛亡。
布射僚丸，嵇琴阮啸。
恬笔伦纸，钧巧任钓。
释纷利俗，并皆佳妙。
毛施淑姿，工颦妍笑。
年矢每催，曦晖朗曜。
璇玑悬斡，晦魄环照。
指薪修祜，永绥吉劭。
矩步引领，俯仰廊庙。
束带矜庄，徘徊瞻眺。
孤陋寡闻，愚蒙等诮。
谓语助者，焉哉乎也。
@kanda D你知道什么叫生生不息吗？就算最初的夏商周时期的君主都不是汉族，但都是华夏民族。夏商周时期的人都是我们整个华夏民族的祖先。他们的后代不断繁衍，后代的后代的后代不断繁衍，一代有又一代。而且几千年历史，南北方大迁徙很多，他们跟原住民通婚，子孙血脉有传承下去。可以说现在在中国的大多数人都有那个时候人们的基因和血脉吧。不论是汉族还是其他少数民族，都是华夏的儿女。华夏这个概念很早就有了，秦始皇合六国大一统的时候就有了。
你只是說出實話
請不必害怕
👍
Korean hamburger, lol!
신기하지? 숫자로 안밀리니까 ㅋㅋ 우리나라 롤로 달연된 멘탈과 특유의 키보드워리어들이 존제하는 나라다.ㅋㅋ 우리가 안모여서 못이긴거지 모이면 다 ㅈ되는거야^^
@Josephina Hannafin ㅋㅋㅋ핑계없는 무덤 없다죠 ㅋㅋ
I want to drop an atomic bomb in Beijing and Shanghai.❤❤
@Josephina Hannafin ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 목숨걸고 정부에 저항하면서 까지 우회로 인터넷이나 하면는 주제에 참들 웃겨요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그렇게 정부에 충성이면 똑바로 처신들이나 할 것이지 ㅠ.ㅠ ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@Josephina Hannafin 님의 계정에 X를 눌러 조의를 표하겠습니다
@@즞등싱 South Korea only needs one
HANFU is not HANBOK: Please Respect the History!
@YUYING ZHAO your country government must stop the 東北工程 first
@@lucileliu2099 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@@lucileliu2099 I'm sorry, but that's not the case. HANBOK IS KOREA'S OWN TRADITIONAL COSTUME. We wore hanbok even when we were in Goguryeo. Isn't the culture of your country influenced by South Korea if you fix it by being influenced by the culture of neighboring countries? Not only you but South Korea has a very old history. In the history of the democratization movement, Hanbok was with us. Hanbok has been with us for a long time. Don't distort history.
@@lucileliu2099 그래 이게 잘못된말이야
@못생김이자글자글
Hanfu is not Hanbok
Based on the quotes from Korean Kings and authoritative historical documents. Korea Hanbok is the one that was influenced by China Hanfu, not the other way around. Claiming Hanfu's characteristics and styles belong to Hanbok only shows your ignorance. Hanbok shares similarities with Hanfu because ancient Korea adopted Chinese costumes and headgears. You can use them, but you don't have the right to distort history or claim these Hanfu features as Korean origin. Hanfu is for everyone, but Hanfu is Chinese
1.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀) : AD 648
“春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製”
“춘추가 또한 장복(章服)을 고쳐서 중국의 제도에 따를 것을 청하자”
" Gim Chunchu 무열왕 asked the Emperor of Tang for permission to change the traditional cloth of Silla, the country shall follow the Chinese style "
2. History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392
“復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服”
“부행홍무년호 습대명의복 금호복”
“Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress”
3.Samguk Sagi Volumn 5『삼국사기』권5 『三國史記』卷5 : AD 649
“(真德王) 三年,春正月，始服中朝衣冠”
“(진덕왕) 3년(649) 봄 정월에 비로소 중국의 의관(衣冠)을 착용하였다”
" In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese-style cloth and hats"
4.Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷
“我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可"
“우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다”
“The territories of Korea used to be ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture - Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗”
5. Taejo of Goryeos' Ten Rules 왕이 훈요10조를 내리다 高麗太祖 訓要十條
"惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉"
“우리 동방(東方)은 옛날부터 중국의 풍속[唐風]을 흠모하여 문물(文物)과 예악(禮樂)이 다 그 제도를 따랐으나, 지역이 다르고 인성(人性)도 각기 다르므로 꼭 같게 할 필요는 없다. 거란(契丹)은 짐승과 같은 나라로 풍속이 같지 않고 말도 다르니 의관제도(衣冠制度)를 삼가 본받지 말라”
"We, the East admire the customs of the Tang Dynasty, learn her rite and music, adopt her system and style. People from far land are different from us in terms of humanity, do not try to make them look similar in a subservient manner. The nature of Khitan (契丹) is brutal and bestial, we do not share the same value or language with them, so do not follow their system of attire"
changing “han cheng” （capital city）into Seoul just few years...... 汉城改首尔也没几年吧，汉城，汉语的汉，汉族的汉，中华民族的汉!!! 十音真棒!
有一说一，韩语里是二战后就改名首尔了，中文翻译才是近几年改的。
Firwok 确实是中文称呼一直没变，直到韩国民众在韩国上街游行要求中国对韩国首都改称为首尔。我觉得这就是极度的文化自卑的表现，生怕别人知道朝鲜半岛曾经是中国的附属国。
@@zhonglinew4235 是呀，rudeness just means your weakness
干的漂亮
[Warning] Those who bypass the Golden Shield and watch TH-cam will be prosecuted and punished by Chinese authorities. Remember, it is illegal to watch American sites.
we in Mexico have the same problem, central and south America are claiming our culinary art as theirs to the point that even well, I cannot say names but some of them are now requesting to be recognized in UNESCO for their culinary art when all they did was copying ours. so do not fall into the same mistake as we did, fight for your culture, fight for your rights!!!! now they have a campaign that claims that if the UNESCO do not accept their claims they will label them as racists...ensuring their success..
lol why not just name them ?
they know they have nothing so they try to steal, China has thousands of years of history, they are only tricking themselves with revisionist history, no one but Koreans believe a word of what they're saying, even Japan, Vietnam, etc. admit that a lot of things came from ancient China
You know you win when the other side had to bring up things that are completely unrelated just to attack you.
Politics doesn’t change history. Using it to spread hate just makes you look pathetic and ignorant.
说的没错 因为它们说不过了才会攻击其他的 一群💩一样的东西
Why China distroied their culture and steal other countries’s culture?
@김정환 “You know you win when the other side had to bring up things that are completely unrelated just to attack you “I think you just proved it .😊
@@XZXZXZXZ-k6f Destroied what？You'd better be careful that one day the North Korea destroy you.They have nuclear bombs😄But the only thing that can explode in your country is Samsung Note7😆
문화재 다 불태우던 놈들이 이러는것도 웃김 ㅋㅋㅋ 치파오는 어따 내팽겨치고 ㅋㅋㅋ
제 채널에 한푸부흥운동 영상 있음, 와서 한번 봐주십쇼
korean is influenced by Chinese culture at all.
@@EDward-yk6es so what??
@@EDward-yk6es and hanbok is korean^^
@@EDward-yk6es FreeHongkong 🇭🇰🇭🇰🇭🇰
A lot of people in the comments be failing their AP World History exams
haha, so unfortunate :')
when ppl take "we shall rewrite history" too literally
i dont even think they have history classes in their educational system lmao
They probably don’t have to take history class lmao
@@snowyy.5275 what i said was sarcasm, they do have history class, but they teach children based on "history" that are not confirmed to be true, most of them are obvious that its either fake or wrong. for example they had a MYTH of a god-like creature and somehow they put it in ACTUAL HISTORY CLASS for kids? google "檀君" or "hroukiliv dankastle". they just think whatever "proves" that they have a long history is true and ignore everything else. it shows how they have no respect to true history and are pathetic. people keep bragging about what they dont have and are insecure of, that why koreans get crazy when people tell them they have no original culture. thats the same reason why they dont have sportsmanship
Hanbok's meaning
han>>korea=한국. "한" is pronounced han
bok>>it means clothing in korea
hanbok and hanfu is different so plz don't fight
Hanfu is Chinese.
Hanbok is Korean.
The end
Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China
Hanfu is from Korea wen Korea ruled China before Ming dynasty we influenced in China 1500years ago
Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China.
Just that’s science and truth.
China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture
Protect ur original culture
Koreans and all world liked ur origin
Not copy from others
Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China
Hanfu prove our history
letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz
Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture
Not from China
We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago.
You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin.
Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea
Youguys insist Ours r from Korea
We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time
No one says kimono is Korean cloth
China is greedy
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
China will be broken Chinese will admit their greedy fault and Tibet and Hongkong and Taiwan will be happy and free
China will be heaven when they will be broken completely
Such an easy concept but so many people just wake up and decide no 🥲
That's right
@@jjyoon3616 Thx you for admitting Korean’s history was in Manchuria And China made Fake information
No worries We forgive you. Peace of world!
많은 한국인들은 그런 단순한 진실을 모르고, 어디에서나 다른 나라의 문화를 훔치는 방법만을 알고 있습니다.
韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。
@김정환 你黑的样子可能很烂，但你绞尽脑汁想黑点的时候真的很可爱😬
之谦薛 不理他，跳梁小丑罢了
@김정환 把👴整乐了
@김정환 给宗主国跪下 放肆！
@김정환 Every country has problems. If you have time to talk about these, why not find the truth to help South Korean actresses who killded themselves. For example: Jang Ja-yeon Choi Jin-sil Sulli Goo Hara etc
清朝的文化也很美旗袍也很美汉服也很美，都是中国文化，为什么南朝鲜人只说中国人为什么明明有旗袍和辫子头但是偏要吹汉服，难道南朝鲜人学的历史里中国只有清朝一个朝代吗 没文化真的好可怕哦，支持十音！
是啊，每個族群都有自己的傳統服飾，而且都很有特點呢。
에휴 ㅉ
因为朝鲜半岛的历史都是用汉语文书写的；现在的朝鲜和韩国已经放弃了汉字教育，当然也就无人知晓真正的历史了！
@냥냥펀치 China has many dynasties, not only Han or Qing.
@냥냥펀치 China is not the union of Han, it’s a union of 56 cultures, including Han. Qing is only one part of Chinese history, ruled by Mongolian and Manchu. The part of culture that Koreans had been using as reference is Ming, ruled by Han. Chinese culture is not as simple as Korean’s since they have a much more profound history and capacious land. By the way, you could purchase history books at good price on taobao when shopping for hair bands made in Zhejiang. Do not do plastic surgery on your brain, it’s fetal and ridiculous.
조선의 관직 옷이 중국에서 왔으니 한복도 중국 한푸에서 왔다? 너무 1차원적이고 무식한 발언아닌지? 한푸란 단어도 애초에 20년밖에 되지도 않았는데 무슨 역사 왜곡인지?
고려 관복도 비슷했음. 즉 명보다 일찍 건국된 고려 관복이 먼저니 명의 관복은 고려의 관복을 가져온건가? ㅋㅋㅋ 이렇게 하면 진짜 서로 역사를 거슬러 올라가며 싸우게 됨. 그냥 한복이 중국꺼라고 하게 놔두셈 영어도 중국의 사투리 러시아어도 중국의 사투리 축구도 골프도 테니스도 중국이 발상지라고 하고 있잖음 그러면서 다 벽화로 있고 그림으로 남아있고 이러는데 그거 누가 세계에서 중국 꺼라고 합니까? 피파가 축구의 발상지는 중국이라고 하고 있는데 그걸 믿는 인간이 어디있음? ㅋㅋㅋ 냅두셈 외국인들도 한복이 한국꺼인거 알고 있음.
한국 영화 남한산성에서 조선 황제가 먼 곳의 명나라 황제에게 무릎을 꿇는 모습이 너무나 우스꽝스러웠다
@@o2k62 그렇게 방심하면 어느순간에 우리의 전통 문화제를 빼앗낄수가 있어요. 쟤네들이 외국인한테 "어? 니들 잘못안거임. 한복사실 중국꺼임 봐봐 증거도 있잖아~~" 이렇게 하면 믿을 수 있으니깐 이기회에 이러한 것을 뿌리를 뽑아야 해요. 그리고 영어도 자기네 꺼라고 그러지만 방송에서도 막 영어는 중국 사투리라고는 안하잖아요.
@@xiaoqiyang988 진짜 우리집 뒷산에 돌보다 지능이 낮은것 같군요. 명나라의 황제가 아니라 청나라의 황제인데요? 제대로 보고 말을 하시길. 적어도 우리나라는 한족한테는 공식적인 전투에서 진적이 없네요
@@강강술래-o1f 중국 뉴스에 나온거임;; 영어가 중국 사투리라고 발표했음 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
South Koreans say that the influence of Hanbok on Hanfu is mainly due to the records of the Yuan Dynasty in the Zizhi Tongan Xu （资治通鉴续）. During the Yuan Dynasty, China set up an eastern province in Korea, and the king of Korea served as the Prime Minister of the eastern province. The king of Korea was only the second leader of a province in China. Since then, the six generations of kings of Korea did not get the temple name, but received posthumous titles from the Yuan Dynasty, The posthumous titles are all marked with the word "Zhong" .The period from 1270 to 1356 was called the "Yuan intervention period".The murals of the tomb of bureaucrat Park Yi in Miyang, South Korea, show the Mongolian style of the late Koryo PeriodUnder the control and influence of the Yuan Dynasty, braided hair and beard clothes were popular in the Koryo, and the loyal king once ordered to shave hair and change Mongolia clothes. Koryo has been Mongolian, and Koryo is braided hair and improved Mongolian clothes. A large number of eunuchs and palace maids in the Yuan Dynasty came from Korea. According to the time records, these Mongolia style palace maids affected the clothes of some Mongolian nobles. In addition, it is obvious that male Mongolian nobles cannot be Affected from the clothes of Korean eunuchs. The clothes of the Yuan Dynasty are not considered to be one kind of Hanfu, but Mongolian clothes. After the establishment of the Ming Dynasty, Zhu Yuanzhang clearly instructed to restore the clothes of the Han traditional costume, and the clothes of the Yuan Dynasty were thrown into the pile of old paper, so how can we talk about the influence of hanbok on the Hanfu of the Ming Dynasty? After the establishment of the Ming Dynasty, Koryo quickly changed from a province of the Yuan Dynasty to a subsidiary of the Ming Dynasty. The clothes of the Jorge king's officials were rewarded by China. Finally, Koryo could wear Mongolian clothes no more and without braiding. It was obvious who influenced who.
Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China.
Just that’s science and truth.
China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture
Protect ur original culture
Koreans and all world liked ur origin
Not copy from others
Hanfu is from Korea
And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China
Hanfu is from Korea
When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty .
Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China
Hanfu prove our history
letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz
Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture
Not from China
We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago.
You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin.
Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea
Youguys insist Ours r from Korea
We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time
No one says kimono is Korean cloth
China is greedy
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
@@666Yourkarma 日本的部分文化也起源于中国，你这句话就像英文是美国发明的一样
@@姜米 응 Evil
@@姜米 Koreans hope China can make freedom for Taiwan, Mongolians, Tibetan, Hongkong, Joseon tribes for respect their owned history and culture
@@666Yourkarma 韩国人是什么重要的东西吗，为什么要在意韩国人的看法，一个小殖民地，以前是中国的藩属国，后来是日本的藩属国，现在是美国的藩属国，从来没有过国家尊严，你记得中国人民志愿军打进你们的首尔吗，这足以证明你们的民族是多么的渺小
미안한데 전세계인들이 이미 한복이 한국의 전통의상이라는걸 다알아
Yes, South Koreans have the smallest eyes in the world.
@@指鹿为马-s1h and Chinese has small pp
@@指鹿为马-s1h It has a big terrytorry. But it has a small magnanimity. That's why we call it a "country in the middle." In Chinese; 中国
@@브라우니-n7u 9.6 million square kilometers in China
100000 square kilometers in South Korea
1 China = 96 South Korea
Lol
@@指鹿为马-s1h yes chinese copy everything hahaahaha
한복은 민주화의 상징이다. 중국인민의 민주화 지지를 환영한다.
韩服是民主化的象征。 欢迎中国人民支持民主化。
혐오발언 그만해주세요. 그냥 공안신고 해주세요. 구글에 공안신고 검색하면 다 나옵니다. 쟤네들 일일히 신경쓰지 마시고 혐오발언으로 도배 그만해주세요. 유튜브하는거 쟤네 불법입니다. 그냥 공안신고 갑시다.
你们民主 可真是笑话 没有主权 财阀当道 体育丑闻 剽窃大国 笑死了
한국은 미국의 군사 지휘권을 가진 국가에 대한 주권을 가지고 있습니까? 민주주의가 있습니까? 죄송합니다. 남한이 미국의 개일 뿐이고, 북한만큼 좋지 않다는 것을 찾지 못했습니다 🇰🇵
오늘도 가슴 노출된 한복을 입고 미국 대사관 앞에 가서 주권줘라 함께 큰 소리로 내자.. 가.자아아
가슴 노출된 한복이야
连主权都没有，觉得自己是主人。可笑不是吗？
今天一起穿露胸韩服，去美国大使馆前面喊，还我主权!
제발 이런 영상 제작할거면 6똑바로9 알고 만드세요 님들이 언제 망건이랑 갓 썼어요? 말도 안되는 정보를 진짜인것처럼 퍼트리지마요 남의 전통 뺏어가면 좋아요?ㅠㅠ 너희 문화를 사랑하길바래 ㅠ제~발 ㅋ
그런거 알만한 새끼들
다 뒤짐
@EN L 근데 지들이 다태워버린거라 뭐라원망도못함ㅋㅋㅋ 증거랍시고 가져오는게 동북공정으로 날조된 드라마짤이나 패션쇼사진ㅋㅋㅋㅋ그저멍-청
이미 문혁해버림
不尊重历史的韩国人喜欢编造历史！毫无文化的韩国人喜欢对别人说三道四！殖民地国家真的很悲哀！还需要别人来保护？역사를 존중하지 않는 한국인들은 역사를 조작하기를 좋아한다!아무런 문화도 없는 한국인들은 남에 대해 이러쿵저러쿵하기를 좋아한다.식민지 국가는 정말 슬프다!누가 지켜줘야 해?韩国女人正在排队去伺候驻韩美军！韩国女人正在全世界去慰问那些需要他们的男人한국 여성들이 주한미군의 시중을 들고 줄을 서고 있다!한국 여자들이 전 세계에서 자신들을 원하는 남자들을 위로하고 있다
@@潇潇-x1t 어휴 얘! 안쓰럽다 얘 너 유튜브 하는거 공안한테 걸리면 좟대잖아! 난 유튜브도 그냥 하는데 쯧 부러우면 부럽다고해^^
韓服是跟着明制漢服改的，明白了嗎？韓國人！
한복은 명나라 때 만든 한복 이후에 변한 거 아시죠? 한국인!
Hanbok was changed after the Hanfu made in the Ming Dynasty, do you understand? Korean!
No, the earliest record of Hanboks are from the Three Kingdoms period in the Korean peninsula. Its cloths are related to the horseriding, steppe tribes, which could be cross-referenced by presence of Tengri in the Korean folklore. It's not from Ming, it's from the steppe.
I said I wanted a logical discussion in this video, so I don't have any expectations, but I'll give it a try. In other Chinese videos, they just deleted my comment.
First, it is influenced but interactive.
Hanbok and Hanfu have different roots. Hanbok is based on the clothing of the northern equestrian people, and Hanfu is based on the clothing of the southern settled people. Accordingly, China's Hanfu was also a form in which men also wore skirts in the ancient era, but in the 3rd century BC, under the influence of Hufu, they began to wear pants. There is a record in the Jaji Tonggam that while King Jo Muryeong was enforcing the ban on wearing trousers, Chinese society vehemently rejected it, calling it barbarian culture.
Additionally, due to frequent exchanges with Joseon during the Ming Dynasty, similar cultures often appear. To conclude, the Ming Dynasty clothing that is suggested to be similar to Hanbok, which China claims to be an imitation of Hanbok, is Goryeo style brought over from Goryeo.
The Hanfu of the Yuan Ming Dynasty was greatly influenced by the Hanbok from the late Goryeo Dynasty to the early Joseon Dynasty due to the influence of the Goryeo style that was popular during the Yuan Dynasty, and Chinese historical materials such as Sokjachi Tonggam also record that Chinese clothing during that period was influenced by the Goryeo style. In other words, it is not that Hanfu from the Ming Dynasty came over and became Hanbok, but rather, Hanbok came over and changed Hanfu into the way it was during the Ming Dynasty. In addition, Danryeong, which was given and maintained by the Ming imperial family, is a costume that originated in the West and spread through China.
Of course, a lot of Chinese culture and clothing were imported to the Korean Peninsula, and Tang Dynasty clothing was adopted as royal clothing by most countries in East Asia. Han Chineseists ignore the history of the introduction of Goryeo style clothes and claim that Goryeo style hanfu is an independent Han clothing, was influenced by the Tang Dynasty, or that Ming Dynasty Hanfu influenced Hanbok. However, according to common sense, if Koryo-style hanfu was the unique cultural attire of the Han people, there was no reason for the Ming royal family to ban it by edict, saying, "This is not a Chinese custom."
Also, influence is overinterpreted. Just because a country has been influenced by it, the clothing and culture of that country cannot all become imitations. The fact that ancient Japan's clothing was so strongly influenced by Baekje's clothing that it was worn directly from Baekje is also described in a number of Japanese records, such as Nihon Shoki and Shangfu Ryuki. However, that does not mean that kimono is collectively called hanbok. In other words, culture is not imperialism that takes over each country. Cultures are transmitted, merge, or coexist.
In a similar case, Neo-Confucianism was strongly influenced by Buddhism in India and Nepal. However, it is the same as saying that Neo-Confucianism is the Buddhist ideology of India and Nepal.
Second, the traditional clothing of the Korean people does not represent the entire hanbok.
Based on the Korean-Chinese hanbok, it can be said that the Korean-Chinese hanbok exists in Chinese traditional clothing. However, it is incorrect to interpret the Hanbok of the Korean people as one of Chinese costumes.
In the past, China used the ethnic Koreans to carry out the Northeast Project to intentionally deny the history of Goguryeo and Balhae, that is, Korean history, and reduce them to a minority in China. Of course, it is not currently underway, but the problem is that in the private sector, Chinese people still cite studies from the Northeast Project and provide incorrect information to foreign sites and foreigners.
In this situation, Hanbok is shown to foreigners and, without any further explanation, they say, “Because there are Korean-Chinese people, it is a traditional Chinese costume.” If so, even in the private sector in Korea, it is inevitable to receive fierce criticism, such as "China's influence and subcategories are often emphasized without any historical context."
In order for China to call the Korean-Chinese and Hanbok traditional clothing, it must recognize Hanbok as Korea's unique clothing. Korea is a different country from China, Hanbok is Korea's unique traditional costume inherited from northern nomadic peoples, and the Hanbok worn by Korean-Chinese people is also a traditional costume derived from Korea's Hanbok. This must be explained in advance to avoid 'misunderstandings'.
In conclusion, although it is true that China has had a great influence on East Asia, it is only at the level of “influence.” The influence of western regions such as the Hobok of the northern nomadic tribes, Korea's Goryeo Yang, and Central Asia and India on China cannot be ignored. Claiming that another country's culture is one's own based on cross-cultural influence is simply a claim that causes discomfort in the country in question.
This is also true in other cultures. In the case of European traditional clothing, after the fall of Western Rome, Gothic clothing was popular, and then through Southern Europe and France, at one time even Turkish and Persian clothing were popular, and now they are wearing suits originating from England, and these past clothing are their own unique style. I do not claim that it is the culture and clothing of . By this logic, Chinese culture was also influenced by Korea, so it would be meaningless to argue that Chinese culture is a part of Korean culture.
Incidentally, Hanfu is a traditional Chinese clothing. However, the modern Hanfu popular in China is not traditional Chinese clothing.
The reason is simple. In fact, Hanfu was fused with the clothing of the Manchu people, and has been passed down to modern times under the name of cheongsam.
The Chinese claim that the cheongsam is the clothing of the Manchu people, and that the original Chinese clothing was hanfu. This is no different from cultural imperialism. Culture does not move towards an imperialistic form as the Chinese claim. They fuse together and develop in a better direction.
Hanbok developed into its modern form through exchanges with various cultures, including Hanfu and Kimono. Even if we study Goguryeo clothing now and wear it again, it is bound to be reinterpreted in a new form. This is because we do not even know how people wore clothes during the Goguryeo period. In other words, you are wearing a newly created costume rather than a traditional costume.
It is correct to see Hanfu as a reinterpretation of the Hanfu wearing movement that is popular in modern China. I don't even know how to wear Hanfu, so isn't it inevitable that it will have to be reinterpreted? It even looks different from the Hanfu of the past. To be exact, it is closer to Hanbok. If you deny the entire cheongsam, the unique beauty of hanfu mixed in it will also disappear, and then people will try to take a part of it from hanbok that looks similar. Then it has no choice but to resemble hanbok.
Considering that China's Hanfu wearing movement also took place after the popularity of K-pop and Korean dramas, we can see that Hanfu = Hanbok was an unreasonable claim due to China's cultural inferiority complex.
In other words, the reality of Hanfu is a fake that is completely different from the Hanfu of the past, and is a newly created costume in modern times. Just because the name is borrowed from tradition does not mean it is a traditional costume. In other words, Hanbok can be listed as a UNESCO cultural heritage, but Hanfu cannot.
China needs to love its traditional culture. Cheongsam is a unique Chinese traditional culture that was passed down through the fusion of Manchurian clothing and Hanfu during the Qing Dynasty. Now, denying the cheongsam and insisting on Hanfu is in fact denying their own history of the Qing Dynasty and Hanfu, and in conclusion, they cannot help but fall into the same contradiction as denying the entire history of China.
Considering these circumstances, it is highly likely that China's cultural misunderstandings and misconceptions will strengthen its negative influence on Korea. In reality, it is only worsening the feelings of each country, and China's external image is worsening. On the contrary, in the process of fighting like this, Hanbok becomes more famous.
Lastly, it occurred to me, but I hope that no one appears who says, ‘Both cheongsam and hanfu are Chinese.’ As explained above, Hanfu cannot be revived in modern times. Hanfu already exists under the name of cheongsam, so how can it be revived? It is impossible to resurrect a living person. This kind of behavior is no different from a child throwing a tantrum and claiming that everything is his or hers. Simply put, that is cultural imperialism.
In the past, there was a saying like this in Joseon. “The territory is too large to be called a small country, and the mind is too narrow to be called a great country, so it is called China.” It's natural, but it's extremely wrong to say and do, and I really hate this. So don't let me get to the horrible reality that these words were true. I want to like China.
눈 계속 돌아가는거 보소 지령 읽느라 정신없는듯 ㅋㅋ
중국은 젓가락을 발명했다. 한국인들은 젓가락이 중국보다 짧기 때문에 중국이 아닌 한국에서 젓가락을 발명했다고 말할 것이다.
한국의 고대사 : 중국의 개가되다
한국 근현대사 : 일본의 개가되다
한국 근대사 : 미국의 개되기
언제나 개가 될 나라는 전 주인 앞에서 소리 친다
Japan: Kimono came from China a thousand years ago
South Korea: Hanbok did not originate in China, or China originated in South Korea
A thief named South Korea steals things
China invented chopsticks: Koreans will say that chopsticks were invented in Korea, not China, because Korean chopsticks are shorter than Chinese.
Ancient History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of China
Modern History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of Japan
Modern History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of America
A country that will always be a dog yells in front of its former owner
Japan: Kimono came from China a thousand years ago
South Korea: Hanbok did not originate in China, or China originated in South Korea
A thief named South Korea steals things
China invented chopsticks: Koreans will say that chopsticks were invented in Korea, not China, because Korean chopsticks are shorter than Chinese.
Ancient History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of China
Modern History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of Japan
Modern History of Korea: Becoming a Dog of America
A country that will always be a dog yells in front of its former owner
@@不传之史与不颂之歌 你用韩文问过'想知道西藏人民是怎么被共产党镇压'的吗？
'티베트인들이 어떻게 공산당에 탄압받았는지 알고싶다'고 한글로 물어보았구나?
@@不传之史与不颂之歌 ㅋ
讲个笑话。
（不是我的 从非正式会谈里的一位小哥那里看到的）
有人跟我说金字塔是外星人做的。我说是埃及人。他非得跟我说是外星人。我懒得跟他讲，就说是韩国人做的。
Translation:
Let me tell you a joke. ( Not told by me. I am just sharing this joke by a foreign guy from a TV show. )
Somebody told me Aliens built Pyramid. I said it was Egyptians. That person insisted on his point of view but I was too lazy to argue so I just said it was built by South Koreans.
哈哈哈哈哈哈
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
所有bts的粉丝如果发现你这个言论应该丢脸丢死的
@@xijinpingpingpooh5093 我觉得您不应该因为您粉了一个那个国家的偶像而忽略那个国家另一些人做的事情。
“洪武二年，高麗入朝，請賜祭服制度，命制給之” 南韓人請尊重歷史！
@@csik7996 한국은그들의문화가없다는것을폭로하고, 매일중국의것을표절하고, 중국사람들의웃음거리가되고, 한국은그들의역사가오래다고하지만이름난명인한사람을내지못한다고말했다.중국역사는 모르시겠지만 삼국지는 해보셨죠.이것은 문화 지식 아니, 한국은 모두 중국의 성어와 음식 문화를 포함합니다.한국은 오직 성형의 걸 그룹 문화 👎
@@csik7996 USA🇰🇷🐶
@@laughing6206
Not only the "fake Korean Wave," which openly copies Korean trademarks and products, but also the "fake Korean Wave," a foreign product packaged as if it were a Korean product, is a headache.
This is because the low quality of such "fake Korean Wave" products sold overseas may lower the reliability of Korean products to foreign consumers and negatively affect the Korean image.
Logos of major "Fake Korean Wave" companies.
According to the distribution industry and KOTRA on the 19th, MUMUSO, a Chinese household goods store, is mentioned as a representative example. Although its headquarters is a Chinese company in Shanghai, China, it uses "KR" for brand marks and imitates Korean products and designs. The product belongs to a Chinese company, and the packaging is also distributed with false Hangul and Korean-related logos engraved. Mugunghwa Life is conducting business in more than 30 countries around the world, opening stores in Uruguay and UAE last year. Chinese company Ilahui is operating in major countries in a similar form. The logo is equipped with "KOREA" to advocate a Korean brand. In addition, KIODA (You're cute), YOYOSO (Hansangwoopum), MINIGOOD (Sammu), and XIMISO (Himmyo) have jumped on the Korean Wave and are thriving in Southeast Asia. Those who use Hangul that is not grammatically correct or sell products that plagiarize Korean products and designs are mistaken for Korean brands there.
Chinese products sold by "Fake Korean Wave" companies. Awkward Korean expressions stand out.
The Korean court ordered the dissolution of Mugunghwa Life and Yeonhye Woopum's Korean subsidiary in 2019. It is believed that a ghost corporation was established in Korea to avoid crackdowns and sanctions by local patent authorities while selling products imitating Korean products on a large scale overseas. In addition, the Korean Intellectual Property Office and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy have also responded by requesting governments in major countries to investigate and crack down.
Since then, the government explained that there have been fewer explicit Korean impersonations, such as promoting products in hanbok or specifying that they are Korean brands, but there are still many cases of clever copying of Korean brands and products.
@@laughing6206
1. Since ancient times, Chinese people have been the center of civilization.
There is no culture in the surrounding peoples.
- Ancient Chinese recorded that they were culturally influenced by the eastern immigrants.
Now, it is creating a miracle logic to include the entire Asia in China.
2. China does not stxxal Korean culture.Korea is stealing Chinese culture.
It's a typical lie.
At the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics, traditional Korean culture was used. Is this all?
The Chinese are manipulating that the language of Koreans is part of Chinese.
3. Western media is framing China.
- They are claiming to be right, but the lie was eventually revealed.
A perfect defense excuse.
Numerous people are suffering from China's txxxft of high-tech technologies from other countries.
However, the Chinese are pretending not to know even though they know.
Conclusion:
Unable to communicate with Chinese people
They don't feel guilxxy even though they lie. This is the completion of self-dexxption.
@@laughing6206
"중국인들의 계획적인 거짓말"
중국 광저우(廣州)에서 발간되는 신쾌보(新快報)는 최근 ''한중문화 전쟁''이라는특집기사를 통해 한국이 한자를 세계문화유산으로 등재하려는 움직임을 보이고 있다고 전했다.
신쾌보의 보도에 따르면 지난해 ''박정수 서울대 역사학과 교수''가 10여년의 연구 결과 한(韓)민족이 한자를 발명한 이후 중국 중원(中原)으로 옮겨가 한자를 중국에 전하면서 지금의 한족(漢族) 문화가 형성됐다고 주장했다.
박 교수는 한국 정부에 떳떳하게 한자 문화를 복원하고 유네스코에 한자를 세계문화유산으로 신청할 것을 건의했다는 것이다.
그러나 서울대 국사학과나 동양사학과 등에 재직중인 교수중에 ''박정수''라는 이름을 가진 교수는 없으며 한국이 한자를 홀로 세계문화유산으로 등재하려는 움직임도 전혀 없는 것으로 확인되고 있다.
이런 잘못된 보도는 13일 홍콩 문회보(文匯報) 등에도 인용되며 중국 네티즌들의 엉뚱한 분노를 사고 있다. 한국에서 유학했다는 한 중국 네티즌은 한글이 15세기에야 창제됐음을 상기시키며 "이는 중국문화에 대한 도둑질"이라고 주장했다.
신문은 나아가 한국을 필두로 한 중국, 일본, 대만 4개국 학자들이 최근 베이징국제한자회의에서 번체자(繁體字.한국과 대만에서 사용하는 정체자)를 기초로 한 상용 표준한자를 만들기로 했다는 소식을 전하며 반한 감정을 부추기고 있다.
신문은 또 4개국 학자의 표준한자 합의 소식을 부인하며 "간체자(簡體字)는 중국의 법정 문자로 절대 바꿀 수 없는 것"이라는 중국측 대표의 발언을 전하기도 했다.
이밖에도 중국 언론은 강릉단오제의 세계문화유산 등재 이후 한국에서 제기되는 한의학, 두유, 풍수지리 등의 한반도론 주장을 시시콜콜 전하면서 중국 문화를 한국에 빼앗기고 있다는 피해의식에 사로잡혀 있다.
유교 창시자인 공자나 월나라 미인 서시(西施), 명나라 시기 본초강목(本草綱目)의 저자 이시진(李時珍)이 한반도에서 넘어왔다는 근거 불명의 한국내 주장까지 일일이 소개하고 있다.
한국인들은 그런적 없는데 계속 거짓말하네 ㅎ ㅡㅡ
누구말이 맞는지 유네스코에 확인해 보자.
진짜 계획적으로 모함을 하네 ㅎ
이거 중국 공 산 당 이 한국 혐오하게 만드려고 퍼뜨린 거짓말인거 이미 들통났다
fact : North Korean announcer still wears Hanbok.
yes
@@southiefcountykorea692 니가 북한사람이라는 증거 보여봐ㅋㅋ
@@southiefcountykorea692 북한이 유툽이 되냐? ㅋㅋ
@@southiefcountykorea692 cry about it. 개속 울어라
@@southiefcountykorea692 Hello~ North Korean Why aren't you answering?ㅜㅜ Come on, answer me in Korean ㅋㅋㅋ
我以为我们亚洲国家都很重视教育的啦。怎么有些地区历史总是学的乱七八糟的啊……
别怪人家毕竟 世越号时候就该明白 人家连政府都不要脸的(´△｀)
韩国人不意外
他们上届总统都能成邪教的肉便器。。。少见多怪了
他们不学汉字看不懂的，所以只能瞎扯乱说而已
@@anartgallary1570 汉字这种老掉牙的字，你学不来啊？
《三国史记》中的《新罗本纪》中有“真德王三年正月，始服中朝衣冠”的记载。
《宣和奉使高丽图经》在描写高丽衣冠制度上有“遵我宋之制度焉”的记录。
《高丽史》中也有“三十二年六月，宋神宗赐衣二对”的记录。
崔溥《漂海录》提到：“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国”
朝鲜文人徐居正诗云“明皇若问三韩事，衣冠文物上国同”
李氏朝鲜《成宗实录》中，也有过类似的记载：
“吾东方自箕子以来，教化大行，男有烈士之风，女有贞正之俗，史称小中华”。
All those korea historical document are described korea hanbok was heavily influenced by chinese hanfu. After korea prohibited using chinese as official language they are losing there hiatoey too. It's very sad that Koreans can't read their own hiatoey document witch is written in chinese.
Its very stupid for China to say hanbok and kimchi are Chinese all of sudden in 2020 while China had their mouth shut for past centuries. 🤣🤣
Maybe they got jealous cuz of K culture and K Pop being famous
Being us the source ^^
We do not want your LIE
Korea has been using korean langauge since 1500, when hanbok was prevailing. Please STOP LYING 🤔🤔
别发史料，他们会过来骗资料然后写到自己的历史里。
@@yiningli9251 都是他们自己的
@@padeng555 wow, are you sure? i thought y’all started using in 1970s. fuck kff
If you have studied the history of East Asia, you will find that almost all the ancient books of Korea were written in Chinese characters before the 20th century. Korea has been an affiliated country of China for 1000 years. In ancient times, Korea did not have its own characters. It was not until the 15th century that King Sejong of Korea invented the Korean characters, but they were not popularized. At the end of the 19th century, Korea was occupied by Japan and broke away from China. In the 20th century, Korean nationalist movement rose, and Korean talents abolished Chinese characters and used Korean characters. Up to now,south Korean identity cards are still marked with Chinese characters, because Korean characters are a kind of phonetic symbols, which can not distinguish different names. Many names with the same pronunciation are easy to be confused.
Don't lie Chinese people who have been ruled by other peoples for more than 1000 years have distorted history There was no kingdom that Korea relied on China except for the Joseon Dynasty When Tang of China invaded the Korean Peninsula in 675, Silla blocked it well, and during the Goryeo Dynasty, China's Song Dynasty was conquered by Jurchen and Mongol while sending tribute to neighboring countries. The ancient kingdom of China was periodically destroyed by other peoples every 300 years, but ancient the ruler of Korean kingdom was always Korean. Joseon was an independent country different from China. The concept of a subsidiary state cannot be applied. This is because even when Song, Yuan, MING, and Qing of China were destroyed, the kingdom of the Korean Peninsula had nothing to do with it. The Chinese treated Korea as their subsidiary country, but since ancient times, Korea has been a different culture and society from China. For example, the Chinese have maintained the footbinding culture for over 1,000 years, but there was no such culture in ancient Korea. Since ancient times, China has been invaded by many other ethnic groups and there have been many natural disasters and famine, so the culture of eating people has been maintained until the 20th century, but there is no such culture in Korea. Even now, Chinese people still have a culture of taking medicine made from the umbilical cord of newborn babies and using newborn babies for medicine. It is completely narcissism that the Chinese take pride in ancient history and culture
Yes and that is so pathetic. Koreans cannot read chinese characters, which means most of korean people cannot understand thier true ancient history. In this way, they'll follow the posts on the Internet instead of learning chinese to read their history which recorded in chinese. Zazaza
China is established in 100years they are just united tribes
Hanfu is from Korea
And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China
Hanfu is from Korea
When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty .
Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China
Hanfu prove our history
letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz
Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture
Not from China
We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
korean characters also came from Chinese price marking symbols dating back hundreds of years before korean characters~
我觉得很多韩国人还是理智友好的。那些复制粘贴韩文评论的网友估计是真的听不懂英文又看不懂中文。他们根本不知道十音给他们科普的什么...
那你是想多了
你想太多了，他们骂人可比我们脏多了
理智？友好？哈哈哈哈哈哈
@@maxg691 算了，他们骂人的语言真是又脏又贫瘠
理智？友好？怕不是忘了这件事是谁先挑起的？？？？
남의 역사 적당히 넘보라고
加油！汉服本就不是韩服。没什么可争的。不知道这些韩国人在气什么…无语
他们以为我们要把韩服当作我们国家的传统服饰😂😂😂
@@audreyhwong00 我去 韩服穿上和个倒立的水桶一样 爱吗 笑死
@@audreyhwong00 韩国人把高丽时期的韩服画的跟明朝的汉服一模一样，你说他们脸皮有多厚。
古代韩国→中国附属国
고대 한국→ 중국의 속국 →🧎🏻🧎🏻♂️🙇🏻♂️
现代韩国→美国附属国
현대 한국→ 미국의 속국 →🦮🦮🦮
古代韩国人的历史书还是用汉字写的 和宗主国争夺古代文化就像说美国嘻哈模仿K-Pop一样可笑🥺
고대 한국인의 역사서는 그래도 한자로 쓴 것이다 .고대 문화를 놓고 대 군주와 경쟁하는 것은 미국 힙합이 K-Pop을 모방한다고 말하는 것만 큼 우스꽝 스럽습니다.🥺
大家不要被韩国人误导了，他们现在找不到证据证明汉服抄袭韩服，反过来我们有大量的资料证明韩服是从明朝的韩服演化而来，现在他们改变策略说这两个没有任何关系或者是互相影响，大家不要被韩国人带跑了。韩服一定是从明朝汉服演化过来的。他们这个攻击还挺厉害啊，为了不让人觉得韩服是从明朝汉服演化过来的，先是说汉服抄袭韩服，没有证据之后又说两者没有关系，这洗白白的一套，国内的公关真得好好学习学习。
All of China's history, culture, and customs are recorded in historical literature and archaeology written by ancient people, while South Korea takes science fiction historical novels written by modern people as real history. There is no historical literature written by ancient people, and there is no archaeological evidence. The funniest thing is that there are Chinese materials in Korean museums that prove that Korea used to be a vassal state of China. Koreans treat it as a treasure, but they cannot understand the content inside and do not recognize it as a vassal state of China! Lastly, why does South Korea claim everything to be its own instead of North Korea? Didn't North Korea and South Korea use to be the one country?Koreans also celebrate Christmas, why not say it's Korean Christmas？
有什么好惊讶的，我都能在这里找到韩国人的视频 说汉字是韩国的，哈哈哈
完了，我担心传统建筑会。。。
我认识那么多韩国人就没见过这么说的
它们的身份证上还需要备注汉字，否则名字都搞不清楚哈哈哈哈哈哈
@@leifang6017 6啊兄弟，這我真不知道
ZeRoAthrun 他们的法律都要用汉字来写，要不然法律都有问题。。。
汉服不是韩服，请部分网友尊重历史
呵，请部分网友正视现况，某国各大影视剧的服装、世界遗产、风俗、甚至瓷器、中国结都声称均为韩国发源？那可以的，全世界都是某国的，某国创造了全世界。
Lol a history book can make u cry
Chinese lies too much
@@jacobjay8333 history can make Korean lose No .1
@@jacobjay8333 read the history book and you'll be the one crying
지들이 무시하던 북쪽 오랑캐들한테 수백년간 지배당하고 노예생활하다보니 정신이 나갔구만? 오랑캐들한테 지배당한 역사는 자기꺼 아니라고 다 불태워버렸으면 됐지. 왜 저러는거야?
lmao learn some history bro
@@junhongchen1090 한족은 선비족, 몽골, 만주족의 지배를 받은 노예민족이었음. 너나 공부하고 오길 바람.
@@이은수-r8b would you take all the Chinese off your id card and then we can talk about history. lul
@@junhongchen1090 ㅋㅋㅋ우리가 쓰는 건 중국서가 아니라 한자임. 그럼 스페인어권 나라들은 신분증은 물론 역사서까지 스페인어 일텐데 그 나라의 역사와 문화가 스페인의 것임?
@@이은수-r8b congratulation on finding the point. It is precisely because cultures interact that we believe that the use of Spanish does not represent one's identity. Chinese characters are the same, which represents China's influence on the Korean region. Otherwise, if Korean culture is really so independent, then now Korea should have its own language instead of using Chinese characters. Or do you want to tell me that Chinese characters were invented by Koreans?
Is Tai Chi Korean?
What is korean national flag called? 🇰🇷태극기 (Taegukgi) 太極旗 。why do they use Chinese Tai Chi symbols for their national flag?
nationalism + Sinocentrism = cultural imperialism
This is the goal of Xiaofenhongs who spread flsxxxxxd to making aggro. Keep work hard!!!!
This symbol is found in a Korean temple which was built 1400 years ago during Silla era. Northern area of China and Koreans have been using this symbol from ancient times, but as far as I know, Han Chinese have nothing to do with this symbol.
@@random_guy1084 korean should learn some history
@@juliakaurbhullar1796 Chinese need to learn correct history.
@@random_guy1084 Very cute, your message suggested that you don’t know anything about Tai Chi nor I Ching, not that I understand the I Ching myself, but at least I know where it came from. If you want to discuss this matter, I suggest you do some research and I’ll be happy to hear from you, I’m always eager to learn something new. 네, 공부 열심히 하시고 나서 다시 토론 합시다. God bless you all !!
동양의 키보드 워리어들한테 온라인으로 시비를 터신다? ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
패드립 맛좀 볼래?
이럴때 잼민이는 딱좋지~
롤할때는 여포지 ㄹㅇㅋㅋ
여기에잼민불러야 중국이 맛을좀보지
(초등인내가잼민인가)
@@이선영-v4s6x
???: 아 그거 그렇게 하는 거 아닌데;;
早就说了 高丽近代都是学习大明的技术文化和语言的 居然还有人不知道
現在的韓國與高句麗沒有半毛錢關係。他們已經都搞不清自己的祖先是誰了，還老說高句麗，真得是可悲到不能認祖歸宗。之後建立的高麗，第一任皇帝是王建，雖然出生在朝鮮半島，卻是個高句麗和漢人的後代。王建自認是淮河流域的漢人後裔。第二個皇帝，王建的兒子還是公認的中國血統，李氏王朝的太祖李成桂，是女真族，他推翻高麗後，被明朝封為朝鮮王。我都覺得韓國是中國人建的了⋯⋯
@@TeddyLikesGame 他们还认为高句丽是他们的祖先哈哈哈，我看文献记载，韩国人祖先是三韩人，高句丽把他们打的落花流水的，现在居然认贼作父
@@lidai6387 哈哈哈 对的 他们只是觉得谁在他们家附近住过，那就是他们祖先。 到处认亲戚这脸皮也没谁了
@@TeddyLikesGame 我就说了是日本人统治朝鲜半岛历史太短，否则韩国人现在绝对要去认日本祖宗。
@@denglinzhiniao 是的！應該再統治個一兩百年。還好，日本人留下了一堆露乳裝的照片，他們想抵賴也不行。我們建立秦朝封建國家的時候，他們才建立第一個奴隸制國家。這落後了不知幾千年,還想著要去領導中原文化。太可笑了。
ㅉㅉ지들 손으로 문화 다 불태워놓고 남의 나라 문화 도둑질하려는게 같잖다 진짜
지옥에서 불타고있는 마오쩌둥 눈물흘리는중 ㅠ
@qe 뭐라노
I’m an East Asian Studies student and I remember through most of the time until Japan colonized Korea, Korea was the affiliated country of ancient China. Another funny thing is that since Korean historical literature was mostly written in Chinese characters and the majority modern Korean people can’t read hanza, they refused to learn history. Sad for their bad attitudes. Also l love the way Japanese was influenced by the Tang cultures and transferred to their own styles while super comfortably admitting the origin. I’m really sad about Korean’s attitude. I used to love Kpop but moving forward I don’t think I will.
@@bydamaz3101 first of all their is hanja in middle school course which is ancient chiness charicter, and since there are many moral historicans in korean history, there are lots of translated ancient datas without any censoring like damn china. China means middle nation. This is because it's too big with the terretory but too small for caltural self-esteem and knowledge
4000년 북방 유목민족으로부터 지배를 당한 자랑스러운 중국
중국은 복식도 매번 지키지 못해서
몽골 귀족 왕실에서 입은 고려의 옷 한푸를 그리워한다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
Yes, we must not ignore history. But what's more important is no one should claim that something is theirs if it is not. Kimchi, handbok, ssam and more may have similar or related history but are not the same. Time passed and evolved. Move on, please. I wonder how many among those who keep arguing about these history do things so great for their country. Culture can be similar and can come from one another but are not the same. No one from Korea claimed malatang to be Korean food even when it's really popular that a lot of malatang restaurants opened up.
I saw a lot of Koreans on Twitter claiming that Malatang is korean traditional food, ignoring that even Malatang restaurants in SK were opened by chinese. Funny.
确实有很多人称 麻辣烫是韩国的，
Hanfu has influenced the traditional clothing of many neighbouring cultures, including the Korean hanbok,[7][8] the Japanese kimono (wafuku),[9][10] the Okinawan ryusou,[11][12] and the Vietnamese áo giao lĩnh (Việt Phục).[13][14] Up to a certain extent, hanfu has also influenced some elements in Western fashion, especially those influenced by Chinoiserie fashion, due to the popularity of Chinoiserie since the 17th century in Europe and in the United States.[15]: 52 [note 1] Silk remains a core element of Hanfu and Chinese traditional clothing.
lol, Korean start to claim Soy milk is their traditional food now.
They first claimed that the Chinese stole Korean culture
짝퉁만 겁나많드는 나라가 우리보고 짝퉁이라고 하네
Nothing will affect you are fakes
ㄹㅇㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
如果韩国人想影响古中国
必须在古中国国土上当过一次皇帝
元朝由蒙古人统治 服装是蒙古风格 明朝变回汉人统治 服装是蒙汉结合 清朝服饰是满族服饰
每换一个朝代 衣服都会发生改变 只有当上统治者才有资格决定民间穿着
韩国人从未统治过中国 所以不可能是韩服影响汉服 只可能是相反的
小小一个附属国 不要太高看自己的影响力 主人是不会想去戴狗的项圈的
@@elewhite5873 해석좀
일본에 의해 거의 멸망 된 작은 나라는 명나라의 생명을 구하는 은총을 이해하지 못했으며 여전히 이곳에서 짖었습니다.
十音好样的！不过我们永远叫不醒装睡的人。
保护十音小姐姐！hgr差不多行了，来回就那么几句话都不腻的么，有本事拿出证据反驳啊，没证据反驳又恼羞成怒骂人真的很恶心
关键是，他们回复的东西总是牛头不对马嘴。。。一会又扯上共产党？一会又扯上民主？咱们在这可是认真的探讨汉服，简直无脑哈哈哈哈哈
@@sixiaoli5192 哈哈哈哈哈哈因为没理呗，没理都这么能叫，但凡沾点理就他们这德行能搞得全宇宙都知道
@@sixiaoli5192 就是自卑在作祟，不愿意相信事实
Korea is a vassal state of China. South Korea steals not only Chinese culture but also Japanese culture.
중국 공산당 망해라! 모자란것들 Позор Коммунистической партии Китая! Недостатки. 中国共産党を破壊する! China Communist Party Fuck! Lack of things
中国共产党的失败!
很多时候历史是不容易让人接受的，只需要对比两国的地理位置和当时的国力强弱就很容易理解
몽골 만주 거란 선비 흉노 족 말이어 ?
Mongols, Manchus, Khitan, Turks, Xiongnu? haha
땅 크고 인구 많아서 고구려에 박살 나고
일본에 영토 점령 당했냐 ?
The land was large and populated, so was it destroyed by Goguryeo and occupied by Japan?
@@아비앨범Abys-Album Where are they now?
만화 일러스트 허락받고 올리는건가?
이거 조차 함부러 하는데 한복이 자기꺼래 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
어우 그러게요ㅠㅠㅠ 화딱지 나네요
Now i will tell the truth.
The name of Hanfu has been established since 2001. Also, Hanfu is clothing that started from following Goryeo's clothing. READ
지정 이래 궁중의 급사와 사령은 태반이 고려의 여인이었다.
自至正以來, 宮中給事使令, 大半爲高麗女.
Since the designation, the placenta has been a woman of Goryeo as the chief and commander of the court.
이 때문에 사방의 의복과 신발, 모자, 기물이 모두 고려를 따라 일시의 유행이 되었으니 어찌 우연하다 할 수 있는가?
以故, 四方衣服鞋帽器物, 皆依高麗樣子. 此關系一時風氣, 豈偶然哉.
Because of this, clothes, shoes, hats, and articles all over the place became a temporary fashion following Goryeo. How can it be said that it is a coincidence?
권형(權衡), 경신외사(庚申外史)
This is Chinese history. Read, and learn from your history. Don't make the lie
@@밤하늘-m7s lmao since 2001?
Nice one dude, you’re the one make my day
@@밤하늘-m7s She isn't lying! what you listed above was in Yuan dynasty... come on you Korean people don't even recognize Yuan dynasty as part of Chinese history and now you are showing me this? Some of the hanfu style has already been like the Ming hanfu 2 piece style since Song dynasty (from actual finding). Plus, the description you can find about 高丽样is completely unrelated to whatever she is showing in her video. It's half sleeve and square collar. So overall, we are in no way claiming 高丽样as hanfu, and don't say hanfu is hanbok...
Now read your own history from various times:
1.According to the Samguk sagi삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀): “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製”Translation: Gim Chunchu asked the Emperor of Tang to change the traditional cloth of Silla, the country shall follow the Chinese style)King Taejong Muyeol 무열왕／武烈王, Kim Chun-Chu, was the 29th ruler of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea. In AD648, he asked the Tang Emperor to adopt the Chinese cloth style.
2.According to the “History of Goryeo” 고려사 (高麗史):” 復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服”Translation: Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress.
3.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記): “”真德王三年春正月，始服中朝衣冠“”Translation: In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese-style cloth and hats. Jindeok reigned as Queen of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea, from AD 647 to AD 654.
4.Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty (Joseon Wangjo Sillok) 조선왕조실록. 朝鮮王朝實錄 : 高宗 36卷, 34年( 丁酉 / 대한 광무(光武) 1年) 9月 29日(阳历) 번째기사 " “我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可"Translation: Korean King, Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗 said: "The territories of Korea used to be ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture.
5. Taejo of Goryeo고려 태조高麗 太祖 left 10 rules before he is gone, and these ten rules are known as Ten Rules 訓要十條 (훈요10조). The 4th section: 其四曰, 惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉.Translation: We, the East admire the customs of the Tang Dynasty, learn her rite and music, adopt her system and style. People from far land are different from us in terms of humanity, do not try to make them look similar in a subservient manner. The nature of Khitan (契丹) is brutal and bestial, we do not share the same value or language with them, so do not follow their system of attire.
@@chencyril7707 bro the word hanfu didnt even exist until you guys wanted to steal our culture
Listen to your ancestors, you pathetic creature, and read your history! Oops, sorry, they are written in Chinese, you can't understand. hahahahah
1.-According to the Samguk sagi삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀): “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製”
-Translation: Kim Chunchu asked the Emperor of Tang dynasty to change the traditional cloth of Silla to follow the Chinese Hanfu system.
King Taejong Muyeol 무열왕／武烈王, Kim Chun-Chu, was the 29th ruler of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea. In AD 648, he asked the Tang Emperor for permission to adopt the Chinese Hanfu style.
2.-Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記): “”真德王三年春正月，始服中朝衣冠“”
-Translation: In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese Hanfu, including clothes and hats.
Jindeok reigned as Queen of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea, from AD 647 to AD 654.
3.-Wang Geon(왕건/王建)(877-943), the first King of the Goryeo Dynasty and the founder of Goryeo Yang(고려양/高麗樣) said in the "Ten Instructions" (훈요십조/訓要十條).
-我東方舊慕唐風，文物禮樂，悉尊其制……契丹是禽獸之國，風俗不同，言語亦異，衣冠制度，慎勿效焉。
-Translation:All the systems of antiques/articles, rituals, instruments of our country are following the Tang dynasty (of course the costume system is included in)...Khitan is a country of animals, we are different from them in custom and language, and we should not learn the costume system from Khitan.
박쥐먹는 영상이나 올려
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅌㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
你们也吃蝙蝠知道不？
@@peiyaodong1709 ㅇㅇ? 바퀴벌레가 말도하노?
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ개웃기넼ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
至于你们说上袄下裙，衣掩裙，下裙博大特征。
衣掩裙是一种穿法不是服饰形制，在战国时期出土的陶俑都可以见到。
上襦下裙最早于东晋，你们查一下甘肃花海毕家滩26号墓出土的裙子就知道了
可惜这里没办法上传图片
@@댓글홍보충참교육러 你所谓的韩服就是我们汉服所改进的，你们的历史没有教好吧？或许根本就没有吧？
@@高冰莹 有什么可争的 以前的政府跟现在有关系吗？让你回到封建的古代你乐意吗？现在政府不注重传统 老百姓在这叽叽喳喳有啥用
치파오는 북방민족 만주족 옷이라서 싫으면서 똑같이 북방민족 영향받은 아오췬은 니네꺼냐? 아오칀인지 미칀인지 하나도 안 부럽고 아오췬이 문제가 아니고 한복 건들지 마라 🤮
事先说明，我们没有说过韩服是中国的，应该说朝鲜半岛的服装受到中国影响并经过本土交融，不知道韩国人发什么病
전 한국인입니다 지난 몇년간 이거 관련해서 논란이 많았는데 여러 사이트에서 한푸나 한복 관련 게시물들에 달리는 한국댓글들을 보며 좀 놀랐습니다 보통 논란이 생기면 상황을 파악하고 논리적인 주장을 할텐데 밑도 끝도 없이 중국이 한국 배꼈다니 중국이 또 한국 문화를 뺏어가니 중국 역사는 중국인 스스로 다 불태웠다느니하면서 인신공격이나 하는 사람들이 대부분이에요 한국 사람들은 다 이랬던가요..? 이 영상에서의 댓글도 그렇네요… 저도 의복의 역사에 대해 잘 알지 못하고 잘 해결된(?) 일을 가지고 뒷북 치는거 같지만 아직도 저런 댓글들이 많이 달리는 걸 보니 저라도 뭐라 말을 해야 할거 같아서 이렇게 댓글을 남깁니다..
보통 치파오가 중국 전통 의상으로 알려져서 한푸가 생소할 수 있는데 영상에서 말했듯 아무래도 같은 시대다 보니 명나라 한푸랑 조선시대 한복이랑 비슷하게 생겼습니다
한푸는 고대부터 한족들의 전통 의상을 통칭하는 말입니다 알다시피 우리나라는 의복을 포함해 여러 문화적 측면에서 중국의 영향을 크게 받았습니다 말했듯이 의복에 대해 잘 모르지만 우리나라는 조선시대 이전부터 중국의 복식을 많이 받아들여왔습니다 신라시대엔 왕실과 귀족들이 당나라 복식을 수입해 입었고 특히 조선시대엔 영상에서처럼 관료복 같이 왕실에서 입는 옷들은 아예 중국에서 하사받았습니다 물론 우리쪽에서 영향을 준 것도 있겠고 둘다 중국의 영향만 받은 것도 아니겠지만요(몽골의 영향도 받은 것처럼)
애초에 나라가 서로 이웃하니까 영향을 주고받는게 당연하기도 하고, 나라 자부심 때문에(흔히 말해 국뽕…?) 굳이 누가 더 영향을 줬고 하면서 싸우고 깎아내리기 보단 순수하게 문화를 즐기고 더 발전시키는게 맞다고 생각합니다 또 한국댓글들을 보면서 자꾸 한복을 뺏어 간다는 댓글이 많은거 같아서 상황설명을 좀 하자면 말한거처럼 한복이 명나라 한푸랑 비슷해서 한푸사진에 중국꺼라고 해놓은걸 보고 한푸에 대해 잘 모르는 사람들이 한복을 중국꺼라고 한다고 오해했거나 조선족이 중국 소수민족이라 한복 또한 중국 전통 의복이 될 수 있다는 말을 듣고 또 오해한 거 같아요
And looking at ancient Chinese records and Korean records, Korean ancestors wore hobok(hu dress). Basically these hobok were separated tothe top clothes and pants. But originally, hanfu in China was a dress that wrapped around the body without pants. However, this hobok design spread to China from the time when the people dominating the mainland of China were replaced by the northern Manchurian- Mongols line. After all, Yuan era clothes in the Ming Dynasty, which the Chinese now claim to be hanfu, is a clothing influenced by hobok, which has become widespread since the Mongolian Yuan period. This is a groundless interpretation even if the Chinese claim that everything originated in hanfu
@@집착광공-k1o
《续资治通鉴 卷二百一十四 元纪三十二》记载：“后亦多畜高丽美人，大臣有权者，辄以此遗之，京师达官贵人，必得高丽女然后为名家。自至正以来，宫中给事使令，大半高丽女，以故四方衣服、靴帽、器物，皆仿高丽，举世若狂。”
"황후도 역시 고려미인으로 삼아, 대신유권자는 곧 이를 귀하게 여겨, 수도 고관귀인은 반드시 고려여자를 얻은 후에야 명가가 된다.
그렇게 된 이래, 궁중급사사령, 대반이 고려여자이며, 이런 이유로 사방의 의복, 신발과 모자, 기물 모든것을 고려를 모방해, 온 세상이 미친 것 같다." 라고 기록되어 있습니다. 고려시대 원나라로 공녀로 간 여자들 중에는 황후까지 된 자도 있었으며 많은 수가 시녀로, 궁녀로, 귀족의 첩으로 갔으며, 이들이 가지고 간 고려의 문화는 명나라까지 이어지게 된것이다.
또한 [숙원잡기]의 기록에는,《菽园杂记》：：“马尾裙始于朝鲜国，流入京师……于是无贵无贱，服者日盛。至成化末年，朝臣多服之者矣。阁老万公安冬夏不脱……。大臣不服者惟黎吏侍淳一人而已。此服妖也，弘治初始有禁例。”
마미군은 조선국(고려)에서 시작되어, 수도로 유입됬으며......귀천을 가리지 않고 복식이 날로 성했다. 성화말년에 이르러, 조정 신하들도 입게 되었다. 각로만공안이 겨울에도 여름에도 벗지 않았다.....이 복식은 요사하므로, 홍치 초시에 금지되었다.
또 [만포필기]에는, 《寓圃笔记》:"发裙之制，以马尾编成，系于衬衣之内。体肥者一裙，瘦削者或二三，使外衣之张，俨若一伞。", 치마를 넓히는 제도는, 말꼬리를 옷안에 엮어서 만든다. 몸을 비대하게 만든 하나의 치마로, 마른사람은 혹 두개 세개를 입는다, 옷을 바깥으로 넓게 퍼지게 만드는데 쓰는데, 우산과 같다."고 기록되어 있다
@@집착광공-k1o Strictly speaking, Mang-geon of Joseon is from China, but its appearance and manufacturing method are completely different from those of China.
In the Annals of King Sejong 世宗實錄地理志, there is a record of giving Mami Mang-geon as a gift to the envoy of the Ming Dynasty, and even in ≪조선부 朝鮮賦≫of Dongwol 董越), the envoy of the Ming Dynasty, who came in 1488 (the 19th year of King Seongjong's reign), all Joseon mangans are made of horse tail hair.
In fact, Wang-gin of the Ming Dynasty was in the form of a net-shaped hat without lacquer.
As such, Mang-geon and various hats are improved by Koreans.
The method of using horse tail hair as a material was a unique creation of Joseon.
There are several records of the case in which only Mang-geon was stolen when Joseon envoy went to China.
It is obvious cultural thexxxft for Chinese people to walk around wearing Joseon's horse tail hair Mang-geon these days.
Chinese people accuse Korea of stealing drama costumes, but Chinese drama costumes are a completely different cultural apprxxxxxxtion
@@nationfighting3929 한푸에 대해 좀 자세히 알아봤는데 한푸는 말하신대로 본래 원피스 형태였고 기원전 200년 쯤? 조무령왕때 호복령으로 바지(치마) 저고리의 투피스 형태가 들어오게 되었다고 하네요 그 후로도 계속 호복의 영향을 많이 받아왔고요… (명나라 초기때 유군이 아닌 오군을 입음(유군 또한 이런 투피스 형태로 북방 유목민족인 적족(狄族)의 한 갈래인 백적(白狄)계 국가인 중산국에서 유행한 옷이 기원으로 다른 동아시아 국가에도 퍼져 크게 유행함) - 고려나 다른 북방 민족의 영향으로 보임) (흔히 아는 원령포(圓領袍)는 서아시아에서 빌려온 것으로, 중국에서 현지화 되어 다른 동아시아 국가로 퍼져나감 단령 또한 거란족이나 선비족같은 몽골계 유목민이 입던 것이 기원) (제흉유군 또한 선비족의 호복이 당나라에 들어와 만들어짐) 한푸는 여러 왕조마다 그 형태가 달랐으며 어떻게 대중들이 입어왔고 어떤 식으로 만들어진지 알 수 없이 발굴된 것을 단순 복원하고 한푸 복원에 있어 특히 끈을 메는 방법 등등 현대에 와서 추측 창조한 것도 많아서 전통의 개념에 부합하는지 잘 모르겠고 모호한 감이 없지 않아 있네요 전통이라기보단 문화라고 보는게 맞을 거 같아요 또 중국대륙에 이민족 국가도 많았고요(당나라도 한족과 선비족이 세운 나라라고 알고 있습니다) (삼국시대 한복과 일본 복식 모두 호복에서 비롯되었지만 둘 다 뒤로 한푸의 영향을 많이 받았음) 또 명나라 한푸와 조선시대 한복이 비슷하게 생긴 이유를 정리하면
1 둘 다 원나라 몽골의 지배를 받아 몽골풍의 영향을 크게 받았다 (질손, 예살(철릭), 답호, 흉배, 운견, 발립 등등)
2 원나라 명나라에 고려양이 들어왔다
3 위 영상에서처럼 조선이 명에서부터 관복이나 유교 복식을 수입해왔다(조선 이전에도 왕실이나 귀족들은 중국의 한푸를 많이 수입해 입었다)
위 여성분이 입고 있는 한푸의 문양이나 관복이나 예살, 마면군에 수놓는 문양들은 모두 흉배가 기원으로 몽골풍이고 갓 또한 발립으로부터 점차 변한것으로 몽골풍입니다 예살(한국은 철릭)또한 몽골풍이고 도포와 직철 모두 몽골풍입니다 투피스 형태로 입고 속에 마미군을 입은 명나라 초기 한푸는 고려양도 보이네요 애초에 이런종류의 극히 소수의 귀족들이 몇 차례 입을수도 없는 예복류의 복장은 소수 사대부들만 입었고 대다수 사대부들에게 요사스런 옷으로 고발당하기도 했습니다 대부분 한족(漢族)들은 교령의 도포와 교령의 오군을 입지않았습니다 당시 남자들은 주로 원령포, 여자들은 중국식 윗옷의 두 섶이 겹치지 않고 가운데에서 단추로 채우게 되어 있는 것인 유군과 배자를 입었습니다
말했듯이 이렇게 복잡하게 영향을 주고 받았는데 누가 영향을 더 줬니 누가 누굴 배꼈니 분별하기 힘들기도 힘들고 진짜 의미도 없어 보이네요
그래도 영향을 주고 받으면서 중국이 독자적으로 매우 아름다운 문화를 구축했다고 생각합니다 동북아시아의 문화를 주도하고 주변 국들에게 막대한 영향을 준 것도 사실입니다 솔직히 같은 동양인으로서 자랑스럽고 참 대단하다는 생각이 듭니다 또 말했듯이 굳이 이렇게 누가 더 낫니하면서 싸우고 서로 깎아내리기 보단 순수하게 문화를 즐기고 더 발전시키는게 맞다고 생각합니다 보니까 님도 이 계정에서 댓글을 몇천 개나 쓰셨던데 중국인들과 싸우면서(대부분 중국인이겠죠…?) 솔직히 스트레스도 많이 받고 힘들었을 거라 생각합니다 한국인이라고 한국을 치켜세우는데 너무 연연하지 마시고 있는 그대로 받아들이자구요 현실은 저희 바람과 많이 다르잖아요? 또 제 말중 틀린 정보가 있다면 알려주시고 좋은 하루 보내세요!!🤗
@@집착광공-k1o 중국인들은 조선시대 한복은 중국문화를 복붙했다고 일반화시키고 역사를 편향적으로 해석하고 있음. 너님이 중국이 동북아시아문화를 주도했다고 결론짓는것도 논리적 비약임
중국인들이 조선시대 갓과 망건을 착용하고 한푸 패션쇼를 개최하는것을 아는가?
중국드라마를 보면 조선시대 한복 장신구가 등장하고 중국인들이 18세기이후 조선시대 복장을 입고 등장함 ㅎ
중국인들의 문화 날조에 항의하지 않으면 수백년이 지났을때 전세계의 사람들은 모든것을 중국문화로 인식하게 될텐데 이것이 심각하지 않다고? ㅎ
너희 한복은 민주화의 상징인데
중국을 민주화를 지지한단 뜻이지?
한복은 똥의 상징이다.
@@ХуэйЛи너 얘기지?
First of all, whether China is democratic or not is none of your business. Secondly, please don’t change the subject. We are now discussing South Korea’s stealing of Chinese culture, not whether China is democratic.
좋은건 다 지네꺼 ㅋㅋㅋ 미세먼지, 우한폐렴은 지네꺼 아님~
@@Sean-gio2 은 엄마를 찾기 위해 유튜브에 왔네~ Vienna Moen은 엄마를 찾기 위해 유튜브에 왔네~
@@Sean-gio2 한족 노예 ㅅㄲ 말하는 꼴 보소
@@Sean-gio2 고려시대 몽골에게 정복당해 한족여자는 몽골군 정액받이 되고 숫놈들은 학살당하고 살아남은 놈들은 몽골 노예짓 하던놈들이 고려보고 속국타령이냐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
이제와서 왜그래...?
@@Sean-gio2 너같은 淸國奴들의 정신승리 여기서 잘보고있다. ㅋㅋ
오직 코로나만 중국의 것이다.
ㅋㄱㅋㄱㅋㄱㅋㅋㅋㅋㄱㄱㄱㄱㄱㅋㅇㅈ
@하녕 ̆ 아ㅏㅏㅏ주 좋소
real
중국발 미세먼지도 추가요
@하녕 ̆ 어떻게 만든거지?
Korean changed their language few hundred years ago , they were using Chinese before because China ruled Korea , Korean changed their master one after one , China , Japan and now US, Korean also changed their capital city from 汉城 to Seoul not too long ago , because the city name means Chinese city , they changed their face through plastic surgery too , now Korean think it’s time to change their history ……..
文轨攸同，赐王冕服，王妃群臣亦皆有赐，衣冠服饰，焕然一新，使我东方得免胡元左祍之俗，复见礼乐文物之盛，诚千载盛际也。
--韩国汉文古籍《增补文献备考》
@@지구인-h3c only copy and paste, are you bot?
@Vanina 厉害，说得好。
한복은 대한민국 전통의상
Hanbok is Korea's 🇰🇷 traditional clothes.
You are right
@TK斷屌群衆 my family surname is Leong we r Cantonese so yeah...
Influenced by hanfu
#hanbok_challenge #Korea_hanbok_challenge
#한복챌린지
#汉服
推请带这三个话题发，不然你说啥人家根本看不见
不要带韩文发，韩文书写韩服和汉服是一样的！
上次的秘密集会不是说要为中国的民主化而努力吗?
@@kk-se7xc 上次秘密集会说的明明是说要为韩国摆脱美国殖民地而努力！你记错了罚你回去会议记录抄10遍
我们穿着韩服赢得了民主主义。 谢谢你们喜欢韩服，我支持中国的民主化！
@@AC-ph2ne 哈哈哈哈太好笑了救命啊，冷幽默真的
simple，you guess why korea is small country，only China is big in east Asia😂
진짜 한나라의상도 하늘하늘하고 예쁘던데 왜 니들 문화 복원해서 알릴 생각은 안하고 세계가 다 한국옷이란걸 알고있는 한복을 니네꺼라 우기는거야?공산당이 태워버린 니들문화 복원해서 알려.괜히 옆나라옷 니들꺼라 우기지말고.
이거 복붙하면 설명 끝납니다.
馬尾裙始于朝鮮國, 流入京師...于是無貴無賤, 服者日盛. 至成化末年, 朝臣多服之者矣...此服妖也, 弘治初始有禁例 -
Translation: horsetail dress, which originated from Choseon, came to the capital...regardless of rich and poor, more and more people wore it...in the last years of Chenghua, a lot of court officials wore it, too...this clothing was too inappropriate, so it was banned during the early reign of Hongzhi emperor (9th emperor of Ming)
記載: 后亦多畜高麗美人, 大臣有權者, 輒以此遺之, 京師達官貴人, 必得高麗女然後爲名家...以故四方衣服, 靴帽, 器物, 皆倣高麗, 擧世若狂 -
Translation: it is written: even the queen is chosen from Koryo (ancient Korea) people, and high court officials admired this, so all high rank people in the capital earned prestige only after marrying a Koryo woman...For this reason, clothing, shoes, hats and vessels everywhere is emulating more and more Koryo style, and it seems like the whole world is insane.
宮衣新尙高麗樣, 方領過腰反臂裁. 連夜內家爭借看, 爲曾著過禦前來 - 宮中詞 (by 張昱)
Translation: Court clothing style all venerates the style of Koryo (thus the name Koryoyang), with angled collar past the waist and short sleeves. Night by night people jostle to see it, because they attended the court with these clothes
@@sylee9165 首先要说明一下，这个资治通鉴史料记载，说的是元朝时期，而元朝时期是蒙古人统治时期，蒙古于公元1218年第一次进入高丽，并在次年联合高丽政权，歼灭了契丹人，蒙古和高丽便在当时缔结了友好条约，但是在十三年后，蒙古人没有遵守这份盟约，反而出兵开始攻打高丽，这场战争打了二十八年，直到高丽国高宗掌权后，高丽才开始调整对蒙古的政策，此后，高丽每年主动，看清楚，是主动派遣使者到蒙古进贡，蒙古也给予了相应保护，给高丽政权带去了和平稳定的生活。元世祖至元七年，高丽向蒙元提出为世子请婚的请求，元世祖也将女儿齐国公主嫁给了高丽世子，双方至此结下了秦晋之好，因为这个联姻关系，高丽的王公贵族、平民以及女性大量来到元朝，记住，是元朝，这个时期是中国的元朝时期，这些高丽人来到元朝后，开始效仿蒙古人的服饰，连高丽的国王元宗也留起了蒙古人最为流行的“怯仇儿”，穿起了蒙古袍服。按照签订的条约，高丽每年要向元朝进贡一批女性，这些女人都被称为“贡女”，原来从元朝开始，高丽就已经是附属藩国的存在呢，哈哈哈，也正是这些流入元朝的高丽女开始进入各歌舞坊和妓院后，才开始被人所熟知，并且大部分高丽女都嫁给了达官显贵做妻妾，成为贵族中的一员。
元顺帝的皇后奇氏完者忽都就是一名来自高丽的贡女，为了巩固自己在皇宫的势力，她养了一批高丽贡女作为自己的耳目，并把持了元朝朝政，推动了“高丽”在大都的传播和发展，因为这个高丽贡女皇后的存在，除了进贡“贡女”，高丽还进贡宦官，也就是我们所说的太监，因为这些人深得皇后的宠信，带动了男性高丽服饰在贵族全里流行，也影响了大部分贵族圈男性的服饰。
男的都被圈了，女的能跑的了吗？其实说白了就是蒙古女人（也不乏嫁给蒙古人的少部分汉女为了固宠）为了讨好自家男人，不得不做下的妥协，穿起高丽服饰而已，这个时期是高丽样服饰在元朝传播最广的时期，但是记住，就算是改造，也是改的蒙古服饰，但是你们觉得蒙古族的服饰像韩服吗？而且大部分都是蒙古人的妻女开始着装，少数汉贵族跟风，这就跟尝鲜一个道理，大家都穿自己也想试试看，是一样的，而且这是蒙古贵族统治时期的事情，跟底层汉民族一点关系也没有。
历史上，朝鲜半岛的服装都一直受到中国历代王朝的影响，这是毋庸置疑的，在礼仪文化和生活习俗等方面具有明显的“汉化”特征，因为蒙古元时期，高丽和蒙元的关系非常密切，所以他们的文化是相互融合的，也就是上面那些人说的文化互相影响输出，两方都是互相模仿对方的，高丽当时的服饰也深受蒙古人服饰的影响，你们看到什么高丽样，其实就是元朝时期流行在上层社会的高丽服饰，这个时期是外族统治时期，就像是汉字，蒙古人就算占领了中原地区，他们也还是要学习汉文化知识，并没有要求一定要学会蒙古文字和语言，可见汉字影响之深远，连元朝皇帝忽必烈都不得不拜服，所以高丽跟元朝结交后，史书肯定也是以汉字作为记载的文字（在元朝之前是不是我不知道，欢迎有知道的同袍补充），并且只在高丽的贵族上层间流行学习，高丽的底层百姓别说学，根本也学不会，也没有钱学。中文和俄语，是被世界公认最难学的两个大语言。
直到进入明朝时期，蒙古人退出了中原，汉民族重新拿回了自己的政权，高丽为了拍马屁，又开始想依附明朝，故技重施，可惜没有机会了，而后为了表达自己的诚意，便想着让明朝皇帝给他们赐名赐衣冠，明开国皇帝朱元璋于是就赐名朝鲜，有“朝日鲜明”之意，甚至历代朝鲜世子继位后都要派使臣到明朝，得到明朝皇帝的确认并赐予封号，朝鲜国王才算是名正言顺登基成功（这里说到世子可是很有深意的，只有附属的藩国藩王的儿子，才叫世子），这才有了明赐服的历史典故在，而且能很明显的看出，韩国叫嚣的我们“抄袭”他们的官服其实都是明款官服，女性的服装则受到明代袄裙和唐代齐胸襦裙的影响，初期衣带在右侧，较幼及短，后来移到较中间的位置并加粗、加长，上襦亦缩短；韩服的个性发展开始于李氏朝鲜中期，特别是女装，逐渐向高腰、襦裙发展，同中国服饰的区别逐渐增大，但这都是在一定的汉化基础上进行了改良，要不是后来清朝入驻中原，改冠异服，汉服的服饰文化断层断代，近些年才开始被人重新复兴，有你们韩服啥事？还说我们剽窃，要说文化输出交流，那是你们跟元朝蒙古人的事，明朝的汉服饰都是单方面输出给你们的，就算要大融合，也是你们跟蒙族服饰大融合，但是你看蒙古服饰像韩服吗？？？
（这是我独自查找资料之言，可能还有缺漏，欢迎有懂历史的来更正学习，拒绝KY）
（有必要再加强一句，中国的少数民族也包含了蒙古族和满族，所以都是自家内部的事情，“一国两半”的韩国就别嫉妒的连脸都不要了）
@@sylee9165 你给的资料自己都显示的是元朝纪年的事，你是想笑死我吗
还有那个马尾裙，实际上就是个内衬，跟穿洛丽塔衣服时候穿在里面的那个裙撑是一样的，并且这个马尾裙完全就是流入进来的，不存在在汉服的基础上做修改，而且之所以被禁，是因为有人不懂，以为是用马尾巴毛做的裙撑，导致兵营马匹受害，才下令禁止穿这个马尾裙的，不懂就别到处科普，贻笑大方
I want to drop an atomic bomb in Beijing and Shanghai.❤❤
Yup hanfu and hanbok are totally different. No need to argue just like Kimchi is Korean and Pàocài is Chinese.
🤔
@Loong Hwang you are just jealous lol plz stop making your own country stupid. China is a great country only if there's no people like you. Oh and plz study history =) Jakckie Chan and Jet Li are Koreans. How do you feel? lolz
@@解离症 Yup they are both beautiful
@@takeshimaxdokdoorisingsunf8597 🤔 both sides have too many stupid and crazy people. maybe this agrument will nerver be ended
@@解离症 agree! Hope people study the 'real' history not the 'twisted' history.
아직 시러요가 많이 부족합니다. 4천개 차이나네요
@@이름-p9g1z ㅋㅋㅋ
1만개 차이난다 부계 싹다 긁어와
@@cse52 나 부계 298개임
I’m an East Asian Studies student and I remember through most of the time until Japan colonized Korea, Korea was the affiliated country of ancient China. Another funny thing is that since Korean historical literature was mostly written in Chinese characters and the majority modern Korean people can’t read hanza, they refused to learn history. Sad for their bad attitudes. Also l love the way Japanese was influenced by the Tang cultures and transferred to their own styles while super comfortably admitting the origin. I’m really sad about Korean’s attitude.
아 위에 쩅궤덜 진짜 녜ㅔㅁ븅하네,,,, 일본은 기무치가 지들꺼래고 중국은 파오차인가 머ㅓㄴ가 절임채소라고 지들꺼랜다 둘이 말이나 맞추고와서 ㅅ1부ㄹ1셈ㄹㅇㅋㅋ
As a Korean I think we can all get along and respect each other in present time.
@JENNYLEEWORLD I don't know if it is written in your country's history book. If it is, I can only say that you are ignorant and very ignorant. Respect for history is respect for yourself. Obviously, you can't do it. You won't admit that South Korea was a subsidiary of China in ancient times, nor that it was enslaved by Japan in modern times, nor that it is now a dog of the United States. South Korea now wants to build cultural confidence, but you don't have much culture at all, so you can only make it up, The south is obviously more suitable for survival. Only a fool can take tens of thousands of people to the north. The world thinks that you Koreans can only steal and have no shame
@JENNYLEEWORLD In order to respect you, I checked the relevant information. Witv divided China's historical dynasties into two. One is the dynasty established by the Han nationality, and the other is the dynasty established by the ethnic minorities (grassland nomads and forest fishing and hunting nationalities) who have been in contact with each other for a long time in the Central Plains. The latter is subdivided into infiltration dynasty and conquest dynasty according to the policy of Korea and China. Infiltration dynasty: It is mainly divided into two groups. The first group is from the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty to the Western Jin Dynasty. For example, the five lakes and sixteen countries are the former, the latter, the former Qin, the latter and the former, while the northern dynasties are the Northern Wei and Northern Zhou dynasties. [2] Another wave is the dynasty and state established by the Hanized Shatafan Town from the end of the Tang Dynasty to the five dynasties and ten states. The common feature of these regimes is that they directly absorb a culture and finally completely sinicize it. Dynasty conquest: In the five dynasties, at the end of the Song and Ming dynasties, they occupied part or all of the territory of the Central Plains and established the Liao, Jin, Yuan, Qing and other dynasties respectively. Considering the precedent of the previous penetration into the various nationalities of the dynasty, these nationalities tried to maintain their own culture while sinicizing.
@JENNYLEEWORLD
不承认历史的人不配得到尊重，日本才是中国的战争，为什么没有中国人看不起日本，因为日本从来不否认他们的传统文化来源于中国
Obviously the food, drink etc. really comes from God.