ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Original Video: • The Turkish Century | ...
Discord: / discord
Watch stuff and learn and chill hi whatsup ⚔️👋🧐
Patreon: / mcjibbin
PayPal: (please only donate if you think I deserve it and any amount is very appreciated) www.paypal.me/...
Hi everyone! I'm an American from the Northeast (New England). I want to create a watering hole for people who want to discuss, learn and teach about history through TH-cam videos which you guys recommend to me through the comment section or over on Discord. Let's be respectful but, just as importantly, not be afraid to question any and everything about historical records in order to give us the most accurate representation of the history of our species and of our planet!
Having a diverse perspective is crucial to what I want to achieve here so please don't hold back! I want to learn about all I can! Keep recommending and PLEAESE join my Discord :) ( / discord )
#Turkishcentury
#turks
#turkish
#turkey
#century
#hittite
#atatürk
#kraut
#American
#McJibbin
#History
#AmericanReacts
#Reaction
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. - บันเทิง
"If one day, my words are against science, choose science."
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
Thats why we love our "dictator" and thats why he is a legend.
Being a dictator isnt a bad thing. Its just a type of leadership. People think that its bad because of previous dictators. Like every artical says, ataturk is a benevolent dictator. And he tried to not be a dictator, but the plan failed so he decided to stay as one. Which is totally okay.
''Like a George Washington is to us sort of thing.'' More, more, more significant. Really father of the Turks for us.
Onun ne kadar büyük bir lider olduğunu görmeyenler ve dahası ondan nefret edenlerin, binbir iftirayla onun Türk milletinde bıraktığı hatıraya ve hazineye zarar vermeye çalışanların ellerindeki tek ve yegane sebep dindir. Dinimize şunu yaptı, bunu yaptı vb. Aslında atatürk sevenler ve sevmeyenler değil, modernler ve yobazlar arasında bir ayrım vardır. Geçmişin bize emaneti ve geleceğin bize yüklediği sorumluluk için ülkümüzü yaymak zorundayız. Atatürk, bütün türklerin büyük yeri doldurulamaz atası. Ne mutlu Türk’üm diyene!
Ataturk😂
Islam’s biggest enemy
@@giskzkz w Atatürk then
@Ching chong ooga booga I agree to Turkish nationalists but not to Turkish Muslims 🤷🏾♂️
@@MohamedShou take your poisonous canaan mytology mixed with arab nationalism religion away from Anatolia
45:20 He didn't actually TAKE that last name, we gave it to him.
There is one big mistake that is still being debated. Ataturk never banned the headscarf. On the contrary, he protected women's rights and allowed them to dress as they wanted.
Mustafa Kemal taught us Turks that we are a nation. We are grateful to him.
14:10
as a turkish person i can say this video you are watching is pretty biased. and i personally would like more armenians were to stay in the lands, eastern anatolia that they used to live in much longer than us. just because a religious diversity (also they make great wines). but this video never spoke about how armenian gangs armed by russians m*rdered and r*ped multiple hundreds of turkish and kurdish villages in eastern anatolia before the young turks decided to exile them from the east. the exile, from the video before were executed by hamidiye (hamidijah in english probably) brigades, (who were mostly not turkish but kurdish and were really too religious (most of them settled on the land of armenians lands after that too)) the reason of the large causialities had nothing to do with racism. also the brigades who exiled them were poorly supplied so even the ones with better intentions probably couldn't spare their own food for some folk even if they wanted to (which was the fault of mostly talat pasha's and his young turk officers under the command of the expedition more than the kurdish soldiers, i admit it) but they nearly got no other choice (while fighting on every border of a country) than to exile them. it was an effed up thing to do but they kept almost all the armenians in western anatolia and in thrace by that time because they were not a lethal threat to the locals.
most westerners probably don't even now or care about our history with armenians. ottomans regarded armenians as better citizens than turks. they called them millet-i sadıka, which means the nation that's loyal. that changed when they started rioting and m*rdering civilians by hundreds or thousands a day of course.
also another thing most westerners don't even now or care is this; yerevan, the capital of armenia used to be a khanate. a khanate is a turkish word for a... khanate you know, google it. about 50/60% of that provinces population used to be turkic according to russian records. now there are not even a single turk lives there. none of you care what happened to them while we still have a few hundred thousand of armenians who are living a pretty good life in our country. no one cares what the armenians did to turks who used to live in their country. i dunno if that's a religious or ethnic thing or just armenian diaspora lobbies are working better but that's something you should check out.
ps: about the "genocide" for about a dozen times turkish government just asked the armenian government to check the archives all the countries keep about what really happenned on u.n. meetings. armenian government refused each time for some strange reason each time.
you can't put it on us like what japan did when they were "high" on military power in south-east asia. self defense and cruelty are two very different things.
The reason why the Turks are angry about the "Armenian Genocide" is that the facts are ignored and only Armenians are thought to have been killed. Separatist Armenian gangs in cooperation with the Russian invaders tried to change the demographic structure in the region by making massacres in many villages in eastern Anatolia. However, after this was not successful, the local people who wanted to take revenge killed many Armenians. In fact, in order to prevent this situation, the state ordered the expulsion of the Armenians from the region. The reason why the Turks oppose the Armenian genocide allegations and the reason why they are angry is that it is told as if the Armenians were killed for no reason, as if it was just a racial situation.
^^^
Yeah I've read and heard about this bro, you are right I think. I read that the turkish solders were in Russian fighting the cold war and to take advantage of the situation Armenians attacked turkish villages and massacred innocents kids and women and the turkish soldiers got the news of this and hiked back to Turkey and defended the remaining of its peoples, and now this is called geno, Turks are know for their kindness even during time of wars .
@@GokuGohanGokhanPlus honestly, you are the first foreigner who defends us in this topic. Thank you for making me surprised!
@@tosunpasha1453 çaktirma.
No one was found guilty of any crimes during the Maltese Tribunals. Morgentau's claims later disproven by Heath W. Lowry, the numbers never add up. According to Justin Mccarthy, there were 1.698.000 Armenians in the Ottoman soil in 1914, according to Stanford Shaw, the number was 1.294.851, Nubar pasha (an Armenian revolter) speaks of 500.000 armed Armenians that entered the war in the side of the entente. Nubar also states to the Paris Peace Conference that the Ottoman Empire offered Armenians self determination in exchange of siding with them. Nubar declined this offer and joined the entente's side. A lot of Armenians were sent to Cilicia (Today's Adana and it's surroundings), Syria, Iraq... Some of them went to Russia, US, France etc. As I said, the numbers don't add up. It was actually later popularised by the entente in order to create a free Armenian state in order to cut both Turks and the Soviets from each other. It was mere a political move, Nubar Paşa states that "we don't just count our living but also dead and demand the greater Armenia to be a part of us", in the "Ottoman Armenia" the Armenians were never a majority.
Now you gotta watch the next episode :)
lol
3:30: southern to some extent, but mostly eastern. As mentioned in a previous part the majority of ottoman wars were actually fought against Iran/Persia. In a lot of ways those wars were actually bigger and more consequential than their conflicts with Russia or Austria
8:44 Who controlled Iran? Iran controlled Iran it was never colonized. However, Britain and Russia had established "spheres of influence" within Iran, basically, Iran agreed not to interfere with any British or Russian military activities in parts of their territory. During WW1 there were several battles between Ottoman and Russian/British forces in regions that technically belonged to Iran.
58:25 "you can't do that in 1 life" unless you are attaturk, because Ataturk did do exactly that. I actually think the fact literacy was so low in the ottoman empire was an important factor in this choice, in contrast, The Us had a literacy well over 50%, and a history of local democratic governance allowing for much easier dissemination of ideas, and broader public involvement. It does carry big risks though. The Latin American revolutionary leaders, and several other Muslim leaders attempted similar tactics and failed.
The genocide issue isn’t a case of outright denial. As genocide is a legal term with legal consequences, Turks want an internationally lead investigation into the events with a legal outcome. The Armenians don’t open their archives, and as much as we might not like erdo he has openly invited the Armenian side to the table multiple times with no response.
I think most Turks are just frustrated there isn’t a legal or solid international ruling, how can we be accused of a legal term without any due process? It isn’t the actions that are denied it’s the ascribing of a legal term without any legal process
Not everyone believes this genocide happend, it's simple as that.
I've asked americans if the armenian genocide is real, is the romanian one also real? Answer was always yes.
People just turn off their brains when they hear the word genocide. "It's a bad thing so I must accept it"
Same thing as how rape is rarely denied
Has Turkey fully opened it's archives who is scrutiny?
Yes %90 percent couldn’t read or write, Most of the educated ppl of the empire Died in long wars period of ottomans starting from war with Italy in 1911 to ww1 & war of independence. Most young men recruited to the army & women also participated in the war efforts.
23:18 Smyrna (or Izmir) was mainly populated by Muslims, not Greeks. So it was not a "Greek city" in 20th century. Also it is not clear who burned the city. There is a biased narrative throughout the video.
One other thing about Armenian Genocide aside from the comments already made is this; during Soviet era, and in current political agressions of Russia, if it is accepted OFFICIALLY, it would give Soviets claims on anatolia, and todays Russia, if they get a hold in Armenia, that would give Russia a claim just like in Crimea. The "denial" policy is actually backed by foreign powers. If anatolia was in the middle of the ocean without aggressive neighbours, that wouldn't be this much of a problem. Up until 90's, because of the fear of Soviets Turkish goverments didn't even build simplest infastructure to the eastern parts of the country. You can not imagine how is being a coldwar frontier neighbouring the Soviets without born in one.
🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷ATATÜRKIYE🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
President Wilson send US Navy Admiral to investigate if Turks did what they said they did against Armenian in Easter n Turkiye. Admiral goes around spend 3 long weeks and had even meeting w Ataturk some where in the area. Navy Admiral send his report to the President Wilson says on his US military report there is NO GENOCIDE against Armenian in eastern Turkiye. He had more report if you go the history of US Military library about this subject. If you don’t believe what you believe. Also Russian military has same reports according to this subject.
24:31 you forget Ataturks name in the whole episode, dont you know the guy your making a vid about for that long, meanwhile at that exact time ur looking at the title if the video smh... forget it dude
Hope your good Connor ❤
By far the Ottoman Empire biggest threat in outside of Europe was Persia, with the Safavid empire( 1501-1736 ) being their main rival, moreover, Nadar Shah ( 1690s-1747 ) one of history’s greatest generals famously defeated the ottomans 3 times capturing Iraq and Armenia. during the early 19th century, the Ottoman Empire biggest threat was the rising Egyptian state under Mohammad Ali pasha, who managed to take the Hijaz and the levant from them. But other than dealing with those two empires ottoman main focus was Europe
By coincidence I was just reading on wikipedia about Nader shah.
If the Armenians had won; The Turks would say that the Armenians committed the genocide. When the Turks were defeated, the opposite would be true. The Turks reject the genocide because the Armenians do not want to reach a solution. In my opinion, Armenians were killed, but this was not genocide because they were the first Armenians to attack and occupy Turkish villages, you can find this from neutral sources. Also, those who caused this Armenian holocoust were not soldiers; Kurds, Turks, Zazas and many ethnic peoples.
^^^
Also in the Armenian genocide the thing is, Abdulhamid had ordered to kill many Armenians, and after 50 years Armenian bandits went to Turkish villages in order to eliminate the civilian Turks there to incorporate that land into Armenia, and killed thousands, and then the Ottoman Empire had forced ALL Armenians to walk to Syria from Northeastern Turkey, and then more than a million Armenians died of fatigue. As a Turk, I have told you the entirety of the story, but most Turks will not talk about the Hamidian massacres or the +1M Armenian casualties because of them begn forced to walk barefoot to Syria, likewise most Armenians will deny that bandits have raided and massacred entire Turkish villages.
Glad you have persevered. The Ottoman Empire had been allied with Britain against Napoleon, but relations soured during the Crimean War ... the Germans being a convenient "other". The Japanese were also initially allied with Britain (anything but US).
Damn im impressed man. A whole hour?
Sabiha Gökcen was not Armenian that is straight up a lie created by Armenians. She was of Bosnian origin.
Wrong, the bosnian story was just a cover up by turkish nationalists. It's already been confirmed that she is a armenian genocide survivor.
Kraut also did a video series on Mexico in relation to America, since it’s new world history and has much more of an impact on your country think you might enjoy it
Admitting to having committed attrocities has two major drawbacks. Whoever does it will almost inevitably get extremely impopular to a domestic audience. And admitting your wrongs brings up the question of compensation, hence some countries (former colonial powers in particular) have an extreme fear of being forced to pay for their crimes.
Or like... you know.... genocide did not take place.
The genocide did not take place, and when the Armenian state authorities were offered to investigate it, they did not accept it, so there is nothing that the Turks fear or avoid in this regard.
Fransa Cezayir ödedi mi mesela
Türküler soykırım yapmadı bunun kanıtı var da belgeler de var. Ama Fransa Cezayir soykırım yaptı Cezayir belgeler gösterdi Fransa neden kabul etmiyor.
no need to shut up .your opinions and reactions are why we are here , not just the history ...by the way apple or cherry strudel
Apple please 🍎 🤔
Imagine, your country is occupied by all the imperial powers of the time, with conferences being held to divide your lands (Paris) in a multi-ethnic and multicultural country, where the people are sacrificing their lives together under harsh conditions to salvage their central homeland. Meanwhile, one segment of society engages in banditry and revolts. In some regions, massacres are carried out to reduce the Turkish population and gain a majority. Because, as a principle, the Roosevelt Doctrine is recognized worldwide. (A doctrine stating that whoever has a larger population in even the smallest piece of territory gets to take that flag). And the government, under pressure from its German partners, decides to exile Armenians towards what is now Armenia, burning down villages and killing people as they go. As a result, many Armenians die in these events. However, reports from observers coming from America indicate that in cemetery counts and examinations made in the region, the number of Turks who died was higher than that of Armenians. Nevertheless, before all these events occurred, the state engaged in discussions with them at the highest level, listened to their grievances, and warned them about the revolt. What is it like to revolt when the country is in such a difficult situation, especially with encouragement from foreign states, primarily England? How would your country respond to such a situation? After the war, many nations, including Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Georgia, Arabs, and Persians, have found security in relocating according to new borders through population exchanges. While no genocide was committed against the Greek Ottoman citizens who showed loyalty to the openly occupying Greece, what can we expect from a handful of Armenians? If we had any intention against Armenians, how did they manage to exist until that day on Ottoman lands? """
It's not a matter of being forced to accept the phenomenon of the Armenian genocide." We did not commit genocide. It is not present in our beliefs or culturally in our history. I'm not saying we can't do it. What I'm saying is that if we had committed genocide, there would not be a single Armenian left; those who remained would swear their Turkish identity by kissing the Turkish flag every day.
Absolutely, writing fossilizes a prior oral culture ... the written Bible was the embalming of official oral Judaism for example (embalmed twice, once as Tanakh/OT and once as Talmud), and Christianity and Islam even started as writing (even if the majority of believers were illiterate). Both Buddhism and Hinduism were ancient enough, they started as oral cultures. Muhammad Omar in Afghanistan, rebounded the Caliphate in 1994 (says Wiki)... hence the last 28 years of history there. You cannot kill an idea! Not just the Kurds were pissed by the abolition of the Caliphate, Afghans were already fighting this in 1924.
10:20 I'm really glad someone on the internet who is not an islamophobic said this because this way it's far better. as a former muslim I can say that a lot of muslim countries or people are held back because of their almost too strong beliefs.
For 14:05 , since Ottoman Empire was at It's downfall, we do not used have both finanacial and manpower to kill 1.5M people, it's nonsense to believe that assuming Turks did such a massacre. There is brief words of my reearch:
The thing you guessed, was a relocation. It's because the nation we called Millet-i Sadık (The loyal nation ), Armenians joined ww1 on Russian side by rebelling. After the fall of city of Van at 6 May 1915, Ottoman law of relocation applied in 27th of the same month. This relocation was not for: Woman and children , non Orthodox Armenians and the Armenians who had a qualified job. Plus, this relocaion includes local people such as Greeks, Arabs, Kurds. In Talat Pasha's record, 900k+ of people relocated in a year. Despite the ww1 and local rebellions Ottoman army tried to keep them safe while trip. But, local Arab, Kurd jackals and draft-dodgers tried to steal their goods and foods. Unfortunately, we could not managed to kept the safe.(1673 people were sent to court because of the damage they caused and 524 of them executed) After incuding natural conditions, total death number is 300-250k. (It can not be 1.5M because there was only 1.1M of Armenians exists.) During war, we gave them nearly 120k dollars totally (with the day of that times). In 1917 they allowed to return. Long story short, we tried to keep Ottoman people safe and prevent the backstab during the war. Btw there was no ethnic hate (Not part of our culture). It was not a massacre, just a toushands of lives died on the way of their new home. RIP for the ones that died during that period.
Lastly, did you know that the Turks were the the first nation rebelled against the sultan ? We, Turks lived far worst than any Armenian, Greek or Jewish in the Ottoman Empire since they mostly had a control over trade and economical stuff while the Sultan seemed Turks as a manpower and tax tool. It is easy to blame a nation with genocide unless not living it directly.
The text on the Saudi flag is a stylized version of the Shahada (ash-Shahada in Arabic), which is the Islamic proclamation of faith. It goes like this: "There is no other god than God, (and) Muhammed is the messenger of God".
While it's a good translation, I don't really think it conveys how cool and almost like a rap lyric it sounds in Arabic:
"La 'ilaha 'illa-Ilahu,
Muhammadur rasoulu-ilah"
especially the first line almost just sounds like the same word being repeated in different ways and yet it makes sense. The second line has the drawn out mm's and rr's in muhammad- and -dur rasoulu, which actually make the second line pretty much as long, timewise, as the first one, and then ends in the same word as in the first line, which is pretty common in Islamic poetry.
I'm not a Muslim myself, but from a poetic standpoint, the Shahada is pretty damn awesome for just how short and precise it is while still sounding musical.
It's just a bit unfortunate that the representation of it on flags is almost exclusively used by Wahhabis and Salafis, literally "ancestor worshippers" who want to return the Islamic world to the time of Muhammed.
I have a bit of a hard time disassociating from that when looking at the Saudi flag, so I'm glad you mentioned how cool it looks, because it really does!
Sigara ve alkol hiç yasaklanmadı. Sadece 4.Murat bir süre yasakladı ki kendisi alkolden öldü. Daima içki içilmiştir.
Dear TH-cam, I promise that I will only buy products and services that I see at the start or end of the McJibbin channel. Yours Sincerely, The Right Honourable Perry James, Esq - Millionaire London International Playboy and 80s Sex Symbol.
Turkey 🇹🇷 militaire réaction
The original video is quied good but very innacurate. And Ataturk just basically copied French republic.
Leave Connor alone please TH-cam!
He’s a good lad, we the people want his content, and I’m sure you have more important things to be doing.
Thank you 😊
17:10 also Enver did not just escape he went to central asia to fight against commies
also I can grow a beard like that
17:25 I can grow a beard like that
Interesting to see how Gallipoli has been so ANZAC'd that the British and French divisions there from day 1 have been forgotten completely in this history. Mines was the first attempt when Royal and French navies tried to just bombard their way through. Japan and Turkey and dreadful crimes just a theory but people asking for compensation?
Yeah well i guess because it was the biggest battle fought by the anzacs, we French and English had much bigger battles to remember
@@Heisenberg882 Well here in the North West of England there still some memory of the Lancashire Fusiliers winning 6 VC's on 'ANZAC Day' at the beach that became known as Lancashire Landing
@@666johnco Yeah but what i mean is that every country has that one battle in ww1 that everyone knows, we French have Verdun, the British have Somme, Australians have Gallipolli
@@Heisenberg882 True enough
Keep trying Connor. Listen to the old saying. Persistance overcomes Resistance. Take all your family of subs along with you mate.
Saudi flag says لا الله الا الله محمد رسول الله
There is no deity but god muhamad is god's prophet
It's the Muslim shahada
nasser meant well but at the end of the day.. he was incompetent as for shah pahlavi, he made people hate him so bad that they chased his ass out then brought khomeini in his place.. little did they knew at the time that they were bringing something even worse.
You cannot be born as a Turk. You become a Turk by what you do. This is Ataturk's greatest ideal: "How happy is the one who says I am a Turk!" This is not racism or skullduggery. For Atatürk, being a Turk is achieved through your deeds, rationalism and achievements. This is not measured by your DNA or blood.
Martin Luther and Atatürk were polar opposites. Luther was basically a fundamentalist. He used the same arguments that muslim fanatics use today: Go back to the original script, abolish the "decadence" and forewardness of the religious establishment ( = the italian Renaissance), you are a worthless sinner constantly tempted by the devil, everything is about god, etc.
Atatürk was a staunch secularist, a modernizer. Luther and the other "reformers", although some of their ideas would prove positive in the long run, plunged Europe into a dark age of religious warfare, intolerance, backwardness and misery.
I believe they are similar in some ways. Luther challenged Papal authority and the suspect rules they implemented which were not based on the bible. Similarly Attaturk opposed a similar authority not wanting the rule of law to be decided by religious ideas.
@@taejasunshine7945 To be honest, I think that's just a superficial similarity. Their way of thinking and their basic ideas and goals were very different. They both challenged the old order, but with radically different directions and outcomes.
They both came at it from a perspective that the current status quo was rotten and had a negative impact on society. That religious authorities through their own oppurtunistic interpretations should not be allowed to control the daily lives of the people. I don't think that's superficial. They wanted to get to very different places, but the motivation seems to be the same.
@@taejasunshine7945 I have to disagree. There are some similarities, but the core motivation of Luther was to revert the church back to its (as he thought) "original" roots. As I said, he was a religious fundamentalist, a fanatic. In a way, he was more religious than most of his contemporaries (especially other priests) and both the protestantism that followed in his footsteps as well as the catholic counter-reformation were much more radical, intolerant and violent than medieval christendom (save for the Hussite wars, but they were sort of a prelude to the age of the reformation).
Atatürk on the other hand despised religion in its entirety. He didn't want to reform or "purify" Islam, he wanted to remove it from most parts of turkish society. He was anti-religion, Luther was pro-religion. Luther was an anti-modernist (he opposed the ideas of the Renaissance like the islamic fundamentalists oppose western ideas) while Atatürk was a very radical modernist. Their motivation was completely different.
As a turk I'm so proud that we had such an amazing historical figure Atatürk , building our modern state. Despite our religious government today, modern turkey will survive and those who wants to reestablish a new chaliphate will fail.
ATTATUUUUUUUUURK!!!!!
13:00 Right, the mine ships. But Atatürk defend the right hills. He act against German Commander's order. He guess right the act of enemies. And acted at right time to reorginize losing defender soldiers at heights of Chunuk Bair and Sari Bair.
Well the american gouvernement never recognized what it did to the natives as genocide.
The British, the french and other colonial powers have neither admitted that some of their actions throughout the world also count as genocide.
It is something very easy, to deny, when you decide what is the definition of a word.
Except for us Germans. We are always concerned that we don't speak ENOUGH of our crimes (which isn't a bad thing for a society). The Holocaust and the Herero-Nama genocide in Southwest Africa/Namibia are pretty well covered (I hope this doesn't sound wrong), but there is still much work to be done. The Mau-Mau War in East Africa and the colonial rule in general are still underrepresented.
Competitive savagery isn't a good look ;-(
@@donkisot6275 We are not guilty of their crimes, but we are responsible to keep the memory alive and to teach the lessons we learned to future generations. I think most people don't realize how horrible to the Holocaust really was. This must NEVER happen again. We owe it to the millions who perished, because it was the goal of the Nazis to wipe them out completely. For many victims, a name on a list is the only remaining proof that they ever existed. We HAVE to remember them, otherwise the Nazis will have been successfull even after their defeat. And if we learn our lesson and don't repeat those mistakes, these victims will not have died completely without sense.
@@panther7748 And to be fair you were forced to accept that by the invading forces.
@@ugrasergun At first, but not since the 68er movement. We are emancipated enough to deal with our responsibilty on our own now. And just because it was forced on us doesn't mean that it was wrong in retrospect.
20 century had a genius who name was Mustafa and the republic of Turkiye citizens gave him a last name GREAT ATATURK ❤
We will always remember you and persuit your thoughts.
Dardanelles campaign has two stages, Sea & battle on the ground.
Battle in sea was successful due to ottoman fortifications & artillery success also the mines.
Land battle was Atatrurks victory
we had conflict with Persia throught history . As answer to your question
I think the forcing you to not be religious came after atatürk since he never wanted to force anyone to do anything. He literally declared anyone that lives in turkey and calls themselves a turk is a turk, so that statement about how it left no room for the kurds doesn't really mean anything. The conflict was because the kurds said that they weren't turkish and they wanted the place they live in to be their own land and be seperated from turkey. The cultural mess that is anatolia is almost impossible to turn into a stable republic imo. That's why we are so easy to manipulate and that's why we are going downhill rn.
ı just want to correct one thing in your comment "kurds wanted their land back" when you say this it sounds like the land belonged to kurds in the past and they want to claim it back. but the land never belonged to the kurds, although the ethnic grouop has always existed , they never established a country.
@@brrkbtl Yes. I completely overlooked that. Should've paid more attention to my wording
@@p1xelat3d 🫶🏻
ATATURK❤️🇦🇿🇹🇷
I would love for you to watch the other parts as well
My advice to you is to research all the information in the video and compare how much of it is true, and if you are honest, apologize to the Turkish people.
Ottomans had a lot of fighting with Timurid Turks which ruled Persia, and Safavid Turks which also ruled Persia.
The Video is very western biased with some wrong informations
You’ll never see ever someone like Ataturk in Turkey as a leader.
He’s gone very sad but truth
Great leader
Moral of the story: Ataturk based
Bizim tarihimiz sadece 100yıllık değil binlerce yıllık kavimler göçü bile biz türkler sayesinde olmuştur
14:00 who says that we are afraid ? simply we choose to not believe and genuinely most of turkish people dont care
As a modern, secular, liberal Turk, I agree that we need to accept our history with its both glorious and dreadful facts. But if you mean that I have to accept every political propaganda asserted by Armenian diaspora without any scientific basis you will be disappointed. Comparing the events in 1915 to the Jewish Holocaust is unacceptable. Armenians weren't targeted systematically by the government. The events were local near a battlefront where Ottomans fighting Russian army and some Armenian separatist militia raiding Turkish and Kurdish villages in the area.
@13:16 yes thats March 18 1915 - the Anzac landing campaign took place around a month later tho.
I think Ataturk’s abolishment of the caliphate and secularizatipn of the law is more comparable to the enlightenment and separation of church and state in the American and French Revolutions.
Protestants wanted to reform religion, not remove its influence from government.
Mines in galipoli were placed by ataturk's men xD
🥳🥳🥳
Yooooo
all info wrong bad video .
There are anethar part plees maik reaction
Yes Ottomans had lots of wars against none Europeans mostly Safavids of Iran, also against Ethiopia & they even had a war in Indonesia against pro Portuguese powers & they secured aceh kingdoms independence there
Every nation did some terrible things back in those days
Türk'çe alt yazı koyun lütfen
3:30 Yes.
you had me at Galippoli
The Gallipoli failure was due to Entente incompetence and Turks defending their own territory on favorable ground. Churchill wasn't entirely at fault, but he took the blame, and restored his reputation the hard way. The US/Britain are guilt based, not shame based. In guilt, the criminal is at fault, in shame, the entire tribe/nation is at fault ... which is harder to acknowledge. That is why the Russians or Japanese don't accept their failings either, they are shame based. Currently in the US, there is a movement to be shame based. The Kurds are Persian cousins, hence historical enemies. The post-WW I ambitions of France and Britain were ... crazy. In fact, neither home country ever recovered. The Greeks of course had been in Anatolia for 2000 years before the Turks even showed up ... but all things must pass eventually. Expect the unexpected next year, the 100th anniversary of the new Turkey. Mao's attitude to traditional China is similar to Ataturk's.
30:26 I 100% agree language if not on solid ground will branch out and change overtime resulting in many different iterations
Also thanks for making this video as someone from turkey I'm really glad the absolute mess of a history we have is being recognised as something that might be interesting to listen to as a story
In the south, the Ottomans exerted power indirectly thru emirs ... Barbary Pirates in Algeria, Muhammad Ali in Egypt etc. But earlier in the 16th century the big southern fight was against the Portuguese Empire controlling the Indian Ocean (there are history cartoons on this). The truth is always controversial, lying is a major part of commerce and statecraft. Islam (except Ataturk etc) is pre-modern, and are happy rejecting modernity.
17:26 yes you shud..
as far as i know from the german education i have(as much as that is about this mater) hittites were anatolian who had been greekfied through the years, what turks have to do with them?
Ha sittir lang
bu ne şimdi :D
mines and cannons were the half of it.. allied navy then tried an amphibious attack.. just ask an aussie (bogans will work too) they will tell you what happened next?