That's like comparing a musket to a high powered sniper rifle. Everything advances, you're stuck in the past. that's not to say there's anything wrong with traditional archery; it's absolutely fine. But if that's what you like watch videos of that, don't hate on this just because the tech is more advanced.
It's like 3 people are talking at the same time, very annoying and hard to listen! I want to listen to something but I cant. Turned the video off, can't watch.
He's/she's complaining because "real archery" is considered to be completely bare bow; no sights, pins, stabilizers, kissers, all the "bells and whistles" so to speak are gone so the shot is purely down to the skill of the archer. But look at my response to his comment for my own opinion- I admit it takes less skill, but it still takes a LOT.
Olympic sight is nothing different than a static reference point, just a thing to refer... No technology. It does not do any help to shoot better. Stabilizer set is just like a piece of weight that barebow shooters got, just that. All kinds of archery are equally hard and require a TON of effort. If anyone not believe me, try one yourself. And see what score you can do. Oh this comment is for anyone, not actually to the thread :))
@@blizzbee if it doesn’t help them shoot, then why is it on the bow? If it didn’t make it easier to shoot the arrow where you want to, it wouldn’t be on every single Olympic Recurve or Compound. I’m not a bare bow purist, but don’t try and say a sight doesn’t make it easier to be more accurate
@@abnormallynormal8823 when i say it doesn't help them shoot, i said in aspect of a "reference point". That means the sight can be replaced with anything solidly attached to the bow for the eye to look through.. that's it. The sight itself has no spaceship technology to help shooting better. It's just a reference point. That's what i mean.
the three simultaneous commentary audio is truly disorienting
Who is rewatching this from jake's youtube channel❤
Me! Getting into archery with my 2 Young boys, learning from Jake :)
Here in 2020 forget the equipment, its who has the "better" Korean coach 😆. But seriously, both these guys are awesome archers.
Yeah. Here in 2020 in light of his groundbreaking vids on form and all things archery I was SO rooting for him in that shoot off 🤣
So true
Two sets of commentary at same time doesn’t work guys
3:29. Jake whipping his bow into high gear.
Fantastic Match !!!
Bravo Marco Galeazzo sei un mito
Jake is the man !
bravissimo marco
18 meters?
its not over until its over !!!!!
That's like comparing a musket to a high powered sniper rifle. Everything advances, you're stuck in the past. that's not to say there's anything wrong with traditional archery; it's absolutely fine. But if that's what you like watch videos of that, don't hate on this just because the tech is more advanced.
What a match!
+Olga Peña 18 meters
there's so many commentator
lol
Not sure I could handle the coach in me ear before every shot !! JMO
Hey it's Dennis Nedry, before he REALLY got into computers.
It's like 3 people are talking at the same time, very annoying and hard to listen! I want to listen to something but I cant. Turned the video off, can't watch.
Great match
"Loud Noises!!!"
can anyone tell me if Kaminski is using gas pro vanes?
Alan Chan I think it’s range o matic the one for indoors
i can even try to do that! how many meters away are they?
18m
Hey, it's Enrico Palazzo!
I think the judge's name is Pat
It’s like 12 people are talking at once
40 cm face?
Sir your Second hand bow are selling. If you sell I will purchase it. U must be reply sir.
hahahaahha wtf
Very good! I was rooting for Italy!
i'm going to start this year doing 60 m so... well, 18 m its the distance that I have in my club.
What's the distance between them and the targets?
ThinKing Does 18m
vai italia
Too much friggin noise!!
Grande Galeazzo
Should of told him to put a couple clicks to that sight
He looks so young here
18 m
I was gonna say...since when are archers ridiculously good looking?
What a shame, shooting tens almost all the time, then rushed the shoot off and fumbled it. Great match though
Or, equivalent distance in imperial measurements: 20yds.
Acualy 19.97
that is a regular recurve bow
poor Marco, lol
USA Rambo gold medal hahaha
He's/she's complaining because "real archery" is considered to be completely bare bow; no sights, pins, stabilizers, kissers, all the "bells and whistles" so to speak are gone so the shot is purely down to the skill of the archer. But look at my response to his comment for my own opinion- I admit it takes less skill, but it still takes a LOT.
Olympic sight is nothing different than a static reference point, just a thing to refer... No technology.
It does not do any help to shoot better.
Stabilizer set is just like a piece of weight that barebow shooters got, just that.
All kinds of archery are equally hard and require a TON of effort.
If anyone not believe me, try one yourself. And see what score you can do.
Oh this comment is for anyone, not actually to the thread :))
@@blizzbee if it doesn’t help them shoot, then why is it on the bow?
If it didn’t make it easier to shoot the arrow where you want to, it wouldn’t be on every single Olympic Recurve or Compound.
I’m not a bare bow purist, but don’t try and say a sight doesn’t make it easier to be more accurate
@@abnormallynormal8823 when i say it doesn't help them shoot, i said in aspect of a "reference point". That means the sight can be replaced with anything solidly attached to the bow for the eye to look through.. that's it.
The sight itself has no spaceship technology to help shooting better.
It's just a reference point. That's what i mean.
Grande Marco
Grande Marco