He's mentioned this a lot in the past that he feels that TS is great for teams, but as a solo dev he doesn't use it much. I'd recommend checking out LevelUpTuts Scott Tolinski's course on React/TS. Another good one is on Frontend Masters with Mike North which is less React focused, but goes in deep on TS.
Copy paste and build another component!! This is like going back in programming concepts? What is wrong with doing passing props and building logic out of it? Of course have to document it. BY the way building blocks remain the same irrespective of the way we built it.
Same goes here :D , I am watching the video and despite I've used and be trained to work with react I ever saw those pattern and was checking the comment to see if I was alone in this case :D
Hi Sarvesh! Are you looking out for web development roles currently? We are a web development company and looking for developers. Let me know if interested.
Hi Abhishek! Are you looking out for web development roles currently? We are a web development company and looking for developers. Let me know if interested.
Thanks for sharing! Wouldn't be nice to also have the links in the video description ? I am in the Discord however I maybe not be able to find the links within for instance.
and when trying to get to simplify-react.netlify.app/ I got a 404 error with Not found - Request ID: 09448c0c-9d90-4845-9b3a-abd2423ad6ab-31935042 for instance
There’s something about using reducer that just isn’t enough. I use Zustand to handle state and I have the benefit of flux with plain functions, strictly typed.
Hi, what would be the price of your entire course? I just visited your website and there's no information about the relevant stuff, like what I just mentioned, the price.
As Uncle Bob likes to say: "The quality of the code is measured by the number of WTFs not given from other people while reading your code.". More WTFs = less quality. Interesting patterns, but who needs all this complexity?! If it's just in 1-2 places, might be acceptable, if it's used for some kind of library, good, but if it's all over the place and should be quick and easily maintainable by other people... Who cares whether it's sophisticated and using some fancy patterns and/or abstractions, if only the person, whose mind born it, understands it (or maybe then you become the MVP and that's the goal?!). Most often we are writing code for the business, who cares only about the working product and good deliverable times. Yes, try to keep up with the good software principles, but don't forget, that tomorrow someone else will be there working on your code as well and this is probably not the best place to show off your knowledge about crazy patterns, abstractions and ways of thinking and solving problems. Ok, we are not passing all those 10 props, but 1 prop, 1 function, which accepts 2 other functions as parameters, etc. Not so perfect as well. For TH-cam and at home exercise it's good, but be very careful with it in other places. Just my opinion!
This is the best f*king talk I've heard in my life on react patterns. Thanks !
Thanks for your existence.
Kent, do you also use TypeScript? I'd love to see some of your TS/React code. I have to learn it now and the compiler is fighting with me.
He's mentioned this a lot in the past that he feels that TS is great for teams, but as a solo dev he doesn't use it much. I'd recommend checking out LevelUpTuts Scott Tolinski's course on React/TS. Another good one is on Frontend Masters with Mike North which is less React focused, but goes in deep on TS.
@@thesunabsolute he also has non-tuts videos here: reactresources.com/people/scott-tolinski great recommentation
Copy paste and build another component!! This is like going back in programming concepts? What is wrong with doing passing props and building logic out of it? Of course have to document it. BY the way building blocks remain the same irrespective of the way we built it.
Sometimes I think your videos are for advanced professionals, because I don't understand the patterns you use, nor your code, it makes me sad :(
Same goes here :D , I am watching the video and despite I've used and be trained to work with react I ever saw those pattern and was checking the comment to see if I was alone in this case :D
Can you post the link to the CodeSandbox? Thanks!
codesandbox.io/s/simply-react-accordion-lvg59?file=/src/index.js
Kent, you should smile more.. You look nice that way and we like it!!!
Thanks!! Kent, For sharing the valuable content which helps me to boost my competency
Hi Sarvesh! Are you looking out for web development roles currently? We are a web development company and looking for developers. Let me know if interested.
Great talk Kent. The audio is offset a bit from (ahead of) the cam video triggering my OCD a bit but otherwise :)
These OBS interruptions make the video more fun. Nice hidden feature!
Accordion is the mui component? In this demo you did not specify how you built accordion
where is the demo link?
Great video and we'll thought real world context. Face this on daily basis, to change or update what I do very next day. Thank you.
Hi Abhishek! Are you looking out for web development roles currently? We are a web development company and looking for developers. Let me know if interested.
@@shivanigaddagimath6105 yea m interested how can i reach u?
Thanks for sharing!
Wouldn't be nice to also have the links in the video description ?
I am in the Discord however I maybe not be able to find the links within for instance.
and when trying to get to simplify-react.netlify.app/ I got a 404 error with Not found - Request ID: 09448c0c-9d90-4845-9b3a-abd2423ad6ab-31935042 for instance
There’s something about using reducer that just isn’t enough. I use Zustand to handle state and I have the benefit of flux with plain functions, strictly typed.
awesome thanks for the video. Can you provide us the repo link pls?
Find all EpicReact repos here: github.com/topics/epicreact-dev
Hi, what would be the price of your entire course? I just visited your website and there's no information about the relevant stuff, like what I just mentioned, the price.
Wow, thank you very much for the video Kent!
Cant see dots :)
Thanks
It's so an amazing
The offer for testing js was only for a few hours.
Not short and to the point. I don't like this video.
Your full refund has been processed
@@KentCDodds-vids 🤣 I'm dead 💀 ass dead 💀
Great video. Really curious, what do you use to do these interactive in browser slides?
mdx-deck
@@KentCDodds-vids great, thanks for the response
As Uncle Bob likes to say: "The quality of the code is measured by the number of WTFs not given from other people while reading your code.". More WTFs = less quality. Interesting patterns, but who needs all this complexity?! If it's just in 1-2 places, might be acceptable, if it's used for some kind of library, good, but if it's all over the place and should be quick and easily maintainable by other people... Who cares whether it's sophisticated and using some fancy patterns and/or abstractions, if only the person, whose mind born it, understands it (or maybe then you become the MVP and that's the goal?!). Most often we are writing code for the business, who cares only about the working product and good deliverable times. Yes, try to keep up with the good software principles, but don't forget, that tomorrow someone else will be there working on your code as well and this is probably not the best place to show off your knowledge about crazy patterns, abstractions and ways of thinking and solving problems. Ok, we are not passing all those 10 props, but 1 prop, 1 function, which accepts 2 other functions as parameters, etc. Not so perfect as well. For TH-cam and at home exercise it's good, but be very careful with it in other places. Just my opinion!
Those "EMMMMMM"s man, great content, but this is so distracting