Ive just bought a 2014 2.4 accord estate in a rare manual version. For the past four years I have driven the older cl9 2.4 type s models which were fab!! I can honestly say that I am gobsmacked at the level of quality from the 2014 Accord. The handling has also surprised me as its very tight on the road and handles very very well. These cars are a well kept secret. Great cars!!!
Have owned both, easy cars to own as super reliable and not too difficult to work on if you're into DIY. Accord (estate version) was a great load carrier and better family vehicle and the IS more sophisticated and sharper to drive. The engine and auto gearbox on the IS is smoother and less thrashy at higher revs, but lacks torque in comparison. The Honda ultimately suffered from body rot/corrosion and met its maker at 200k + miles while the Lexus is now on 170k miles and still drives like a new car. Yes, things have needed repair on the IS, brake callipers, water pump, coolant thermostat, rear box exhaust hangers, but stuff that normally breaks/fails on other cars of this age just keeps working on the IS. If you value ride quality keep away from large wheels and 'sports' versions particularly with the appalling state of UK roads. Either vehicle is excellent in my view, and choice will largely depend on your carrying requirement - just watch out for corrosion on the Accord. PS Found 2.4 Honda engine thirsty compared to Lexus, plus it's also worth checking the VED band before making a purchase!
Thanks for the review!! I love the Lexus IS250 (emotional decision), interior is amazing, and reliable, but is small compared to Accord, older models (IS) don't have 60/40 seats, the acceleration is not good for a V6, and taller people don't fit well, because with 6 feet tall, my head touches the ceiling and direct injection problem... Accord may be the rational decision because is a little bit bigger (space), has good trunk size, has good fuel economy, is good for taller people and I prefer FWD...
Cool, you always compare the cars I am interested in buying! Lexus should have sold the IS350 in Europe as RWD / AWD. Juding from the Toyota/Lexus YT channel "The car care nut" says that one is the best to buy. It is also very fast! The IS250 had direct port injection which causes carbon build up. Other than that superb car. The Accord is very good, the steering is a bit too light for my taste. The 7th gen 2003-2007 was a beautiful car but even lighter in the steering and these had issues with the steering pump (O-ring or complete unit - causing foam in the system). Some 8th gen and CR-V are effected too. Keep up the video's! PS wear a jacket that does not make that creaky noise al the time 😉
Thank you. I do wonder if they revised the steering on the facelift models as it definitely has more weight to it than the earlier models. An IS350 would be a hell of a car as would a J series Accord !
@@tommyzoo There is a USA Accord for sale near my house with the 3.5 engine, but I would opt for the Legend because it is on another level. Can't seem to find the right trim and mileage, they are sought after on mainland Europe.
The earliest models of Lexus IS250 2005 uses port injection. So I always tell people who are looking for them to buy this model. The manual version of these Lexus cars are really terrible tho. And I usually prefer manual.
Could anyone help me with the choice? I added Lexus gs 430 from 2005 and škoda super 3,6 L V6 and Passat 3,6 L V6. Or even older Honda accord 2.0 L from 2006 with 130k km
I am downgrading from Lexus IS300H (2014) soon, and 2.4 Auto Accord has caught my interest. It should be cheaper to run (fuel + VED) , but at the expense of RWD and cabin noise. Should be roomier too.
Looked at a 2016 is300h before deciding on a 2.4 accord from 2009,what made you do the switch?Heard the 300h is pretty good,too bad for that cvt transmission noise ,but the interior is amazing imo.
Your do great videos, and all the cars you sell are mostly top of the range and in mint condition, if I was in the U.K. I wouldn’t buy a car from anybody else, and let me tell you I’m fussy about my cars as are you.
not in my experience. For a 2.4 I found it to be the least reliant Vtec in terms of needing revs. Its a really flexible engine with a very broad power band
@@petergiourelas3753 if the 4.0 engine was in the accord that would make sense ! But for a 2.4 the Honda engine is very good for a normally aspirated unit. If you’re used to a 4.0 it clearly isn’t going to have the same grunt !
The 2.0 accord auto is more responsive and felt smoother the 2.4 gearing is just wierd and lazy i had 2 x 2.0 and 2 x 2.4 of the same models of the honda accords all automatics.. also owned few lexus is250s ,if the is250 had more rear legroom and boot space the accords wouldnt even come close.
The 2.0 accord auto is more responsive and felt smoother,the 2.4 gearing is just wierd and lazy i had 2 x 2.0 and 2 x 2.4 of the same models of the honda accords all automatics.. also owned few lexus is250s ,if the is250 had more rear legroom and boot space the accords wouldnt even come close.
@@tommyzoo to fully enjoy a car the engine and gearboxes need to work together nicely.. these accords engine are weak and gearboxes feel ancient push your foot down slightly on the 2.4 and nothing happens unless you floor it a proper slug and the weight of the car is too much .. its ok for a runabout car to get you around nothing exciteing at all .. i would even go to say the 03 to 08 models are much better to drive and put together apart from looking a bit old now .. the lexus wins in every way apart from practicality..
The F Sport suspension would probably account for the difference in ride between the two, and it also seems to be very sensitive to tyre brands and pressures. For my typical driving mix, the F Sport was preferred over the other models in the IS range (less floaty). Always loved the Honda though, and still think the previous generation had better ride, handling and body control than this gen!
Handling i'd agree but no way does a CL9 gen have better ride and body control ,chalk and cheese between the newer CU is much better,much stiffer and stronger body . The CU is also more reliable with less issues however the CL9 has a better version of the K24 series motor if you want to modify it.
Ive just bought a 2014 2.4 accord estate in a rare manual version. For the past four years I have driven the older cl9 2.4 type s models which were fab!! I can honestly say that I am gobsmacked at the level of quality from the 2014 Accord. The handling has also surprised me as its very tight on the road and handles very very well. These cars are a well kept secret. Great cars!!!
Best choice.The Honda 6 speed would be one of the best manual gearboxes ever made /designed by any manufacturer.
Have owned both, easy cars to own as super reliable and not too difficult to work on if you're into DIY. Accord (estate version) was a great load carrier and better family vehicle and the IS more sophisticated and sharper to drive. The engine and auto gearbox on the IS is smoother and less thrashy at higher revs, but lacks torque in comparison. The Honda ultimately suffered from body rot/corrosion and met its maker at 200k + miles while the Lexus is now on 170k miles and still drives like a new car. Yes, things have needed repair on the IS, brake callipers, water pump, coolant thermostat, rear box exhaust hangers, but stuff that normally breaks/fails on other cars of this age just keeps working on the IS. If you value ride quality keep away from large wheels and 'sports' versions particularly with the appalling state of UK roads. Either vehicle is excellent in my view, and choice will largely depend on your carrying requirement - just watch out for corrosion on the Accord. PS Found 2.4 Honda engine thirsty compared to Lexus, plus it's also worth checking the VED band before making a purchase!
Good video. I like both cars, couldn't choose between them without driving them
The video I've been waiting for. Thanks buddy 👌
Thanks for the review!! I love the Lexus IS250 (emotional decision), interior is amazing, and reliable, but is small compared to Accord, older models (IS) don't have 60/40 seats, the acceleration is not good for a V6, and taller people don't fit well, because with 6 feet tall, my head touches the ceiling and direct injection problem... Accord may be the rational decision because is a little bit bigger (space), has good trunk size, has good fuel economy, is good for taller people and I prefer FWD...
Another honda man ! I've had 3 accords, and a Legend KB1, which I still own. I know exactly what you mean by honda. They never feel old !
It's missing more likes, loved, I am trying to decide BTW those two which one is better for me, we appreciate your work, keep going
Lol I’m not worried about likes ! Hope you found it useful
This is great video. I'm trying to decide between Honda Accord coupe and 2010 Lexus is 250❤️
Cool, you always compare the cars I am interested in buying! Lexus should have sold the IS350 in Europe as RWD / AWD. Juding from the Toyota/Lexus YT channel "The car care nut" says that one is the best to buy. It is also very fast! The IS250 had direct port injection which causes carbon build up. Other than that superb car. The Accord is very good, the steering is a bit too light for my taste. The 7th gen 2003-2007 was a beautiful car but even lighter in the steering and these had issues with the steering pump (O-ring or complete unit - causing foam in the system). Some 8th gen and CR-V are effected too. Keep up the video's! PS wear a jacket that does not make that creaky noise al the time 😉
Thank you. I do wonder if they revised the steering on the facelift models as it definitely has more weight to it than the earlier models. An IS350 would be a hell of a car as would a J series Accord !
@@tommyzoo There is a USA Accord for sale near my house with the 3.5 engine, but I would opt for the Legend because it is on another level. Can't seem to find the right trim and mileage, they are sought after on mainland Europe.
The earliest models of Lexus IS250 2005 uses port injection. So I always tell people who are looking for them to buy this model.
The manual version of these Lexus cars are really terrible tho. And I usually prefer manual.
run a bottle of seafoam through the intake on the is250 every year and that should prevent the carbon build up.
I'm exactly deciding between two cars
Could anyone help me with the choice? I added Lexus gs 430 from 2005 and škoda super 3,6 L V6 and Passat 3,6 L V6. Or even older Honda accord 2.0 L from 2006 with 130k km
I am downgrading from Lexus IS300H (2014) soon, and 2.4 Auto Accord has caught my interest. It should be cheaper to run (fuel + VED) , but at the expense of RWD and cabin noise. Should be roomier too.
Looked at a 2016 is300h before deciding on a 2.4 accord from 2009,what made you do the switch?Heard the 300h is pretty good,too bad for that cvt transmission noise ,but the interior is amazing imo.
Just go for an GS Lexus or ES
Your do great videos, and all the cars you sell are mostly top of the range and in mint condition, if I was in the U.K. I wouldn’t buy a car from anybody else, and let me tell you I’m fussy about my cars as are you.
I just brought honda accord 2.4 vtec its good but motor weak down low in tev range.
not in my experience. For a 2.4 I found it to be the least reliant Vtec in terms of needing revs. Its a really flexible engine with a very broad power band
@@tommyzoo try driving a 4.0 barra motor in falcon, and you may understand.
@@petergiourelas3753 if the 4.0 engine was in the accord that would make sense ! But for a 2.4 the Honda engine is very good for a normally aspirated unit.
If you’re used to a 4.0 it clearly isn’t going to have the same grunt !
The 2.0 accord auto is more responsive and felt smoother the 2.4 gearing is just wierd and lazy i had 2 x 2.0 and 2 x 2.4 of the same models of the honda accords all automatics.. also owned few lexus is250s ,if the is250 had more rear legroom and boot space the accords wouldnt even come close.
Apart from looks and handling, the Lexus has a fantastic v6 engine with a smooth transmission. That would be the decisive factor for me.
Also hard to beat RWD
@@FrackaLacka Generally true, but the regular IS is nothing special when it comes to driving dynamics. Nothing like a BMW..
The 2.0 accord auto is more responsive and felt smoother,the 2.4 gearing is just wierd and lazy i had 2 x 2.0 and 2 x 2.4 of the same models of the honda accords all automatics.. also owned few lexus is250s ,if the is250 had more rear legroom and boot space the accords wouldnt even come close.
I guess we beg to differ
@@tommyzoo of course you would honda fanboy lol .. toyota lexus on another level simple.
@@shabulhaque333 I sell both and have sold thousands. But I respect opinions
@@tommyzoo to fully enjoy a car the engine and gearboxes need to work together nicely.. these accords engine are weak and gearboxes feel ancient push your foot down slightly on the 2.4 and nothing happens unless you floor it a proper slug and the weight of the car is too much .. its ok for a runabout car to get you around nothing exciteing at all .. i would even go to say the 03 to 08 models are much better to drive and put together apart from looking a bit old now .. the lexus wins in every way apart from practicality..
@@shabulhaque333 as I said we need to agree to disagree
The F Sport suspension would probably account for the difference in ride between the two, and it also seems to be very sensitive to tyre brands and pressures. For my typical driving mix, the F Sport was preferred over the other models in the IS range (less floaty). Always loved the Honda though, and still think the previous generation had better ride, handling and body control than this gen!
Handling i'd agree but no way does a CL9 gen have better ride and body control ,chalk and cheese between the newer CU is much better,much stiffer and stronger body . The CU is also more reliable with less issues however the CL9 has a better version of the K24 series motor if you want to modify it.
There is a problem with this video😡
What’s the issue?
The problem is you couldn't afford either of them matey
Wow; I've never been so bored. I was after either of these cars; but I ended up falling asleep
You will not get a better explanation of side to side comparison over those 2 cars. But if you fall asleep watching a video, I bet you drive a prius