Thank you for sharing! Amazing! Could anybody help explain why I can't do this ----return helperMethod (s, ++a_pointer, b_pointer) || helperMethod (s, a_pointer, --b_pointer). It's wrong when I do this.
Actually, you're using the increment(++) & decrement(- -) operator with the respective pointers which is leading to an unwanted update of the value of the pointers which in turn is leading to disruption in the normal flow of the loop(the expected one) and ultimately a wrong solution and so instead use '+' operator or '-' in this case.
Love your explanation. It would be helpful if you discuss the time complexity of the solution in future videos. Thanks!
Hey are u preparing for coding interview or something lets be coding friends?,
like the easy going /casual atmosphere
your video conveys👍
I really liked the approach and the way he said:"We are really having a bad day guys" when the submission failed..
What will be the time complexity for this solution?
You explain the code very well.
This is so bad I love it!
Thank you for sharing! Amazing! Could anybody help explain why I can't do this ----return helperMethod (s, ++a_pointer, b_pointer) || helperMethod (s, a_pointer, --b_pointer). It's wrong when I do this.
Actually, you're using the increment(++) & decrement(- -) operator with the respective pointers which is leading to an unwanted update of the value of the pointers which in turn is leading to disruption in the normal flow of the loop(the expected one) and ultimately a wrong solution and so instead use '+' operator or '-' in this case.
Can you explain it again please in a new video??
is the time complexity n^2?
Still O(n)
@@rodrickedwards2759 yeah, you're right, it got me too, but you only enter the second while loop once you found a mismatch so it makes sense
Nick must be tired to fail three times in the row
I didn't know HackerRank changed the interface
haha this is Leetcode
excellent
Its ok dude nice video✌️
Thanks alot
damn eziest solution I saw