This is great! Thank you! I especially agree with Graham Harman's comments made 57 minutes in, about the need to understand architecture and communicate about architecture indirectly, via metaphor, poetry and art. This of course is not the only way, but cannot be avoided if we seek to approach architectural understanding. Kahn is among our best exemplars. Also, what he says at 1:34-6 is so obvious it should not need to be said, but polemics being what they are, even that which is self-evident must sometimes be stated explicitly.
This is great! Thank you! I especially agree with Graham Harman's comments made 57 minutes in, about the need to understand architecture and communicate about architecture indirectly, via metaphor, poetry and art. This of course is not the only way, but cannot be avoided if we seek to approach architectural understanding. Kahn is among our best exemplars. Also, what he says at 1:34-6 is so obvious it should not need to be said, but polemics being what they are, even that which is self-evident must sometimes be stated explicitly.
23:19 there is a real 'out there' independent of thought. Out there where exactly Graham?
Outside of our thoughts. An independent reality that is not necessarily in correlation with humans.
Why is there this cringey back and forth between the presenters? Embarrassing
it's all a bunch of junk
Inget fan av objektorienterad filosofi förstår jag?
ha, OOO är helt ok. Höll på att skiva uppsats om det och var väl lite frustrerad.