This is a relative issue, which will determine the best option will depend on the model pre established by the company. The E2 is a quieter aircraft, and has an economic advantage when it comes to regional flights, the A220 has greater capacity related to fuel, being able to carry out long distance flights. In terms of comfort, the E2 stands out in this regard, it is worth mentioning that there is no tight plane, this issue of distance between the seats will be defined by the airline, as the E2 is configured 2-2, it is superior to the A220 in terms of comfort, it is worth mentioning that the E2s are cheaper aircraft than the A220.
Each aircraft has a specific purpose. Me as a client I must define what I want... If I want low cost, less noise and maintenance, more profit, etc., then, I will choose E195-E2.
People forget that the E-2 is not called profit hunter for nothing. To flies with 90-120 passengers, a great majority for those jets, the E-2 is just 40% more lucrative, fuel per passenger (-25%) and maintenance being the main reason.
The A220 was originally Bombardier's C series aircraft, and Airbus bought it from Bombardier. To me, the A220 looks better, but 195 E2 is the more economical option.
for regional service, E2 is the best. Autonomy is suitable for the vast majority of routes, its cost per seat is lower. is an airplane that has more care in the project, as different wings for each version, for better efficiency, not having a single wing for all versions like the airbus model. So much so that it has the lowest noise level. ACJ 220 if I were to choose only for longer, low-demand routes, where greater autonomy would be decisive. The reports of the companies that use the E2 show that it exceeds the efficiency gain promised by Embraer in some points.
Did I miss the price per unit? In terms of range and capacity (only 3 ,ore seats), the Airbus is better. If the price of the E2 is significantly lower then the A220, so its a better aircraft for short flights.
ah, 2 planes from the Americas. Embraer is Brazilian while the A220 isn't actually an Airbus development. it's Bombardier CSeries which EADS bought on the cheap.
So, why is the A220 outselling the E2 greater than 2-1? Manufacturers list price is irrelevant. Final price is what the purchaser negotiates with the manufacturer. The E2 is a regional airliner. The 220 has the potential for medium to longer range operation, including trans Atlantic and trans continental - a much more flexible platform. If I was buying one as a personal aircraft, I'd buy an E2 purely on price alone and add long range tanks in the cargo holds. If I'm an airline, it would be the 220 hands down.
I wonder how many A320s are being cannibalised by the A220. Also a problem for the B737. Meanwhile we see B737 crossing The Atlantic instead of the big two aisle planes. There is probably a lot of markets for the cheaper E195 in Africa and Asia.
Todos os videos comparando aeronaves brasileiras tem uma notavel particularidade de sempre desqualificar......esta nitido o desespero das fabricantes air bus e3 boeing......com o vira latas da americca latina......é infinitamente superior os custos e vantagens de uso para uma compania aerea......os embraer são economicos.....manutenção barata.....os gringos estão se cagando de medo das companias adotarem aviãos brasileiros.... vou so relembrar esses gringos tanga frouxa ....aqui é Santos Dumont.....O resto é avião de estilingue.....
I will always prefer flying on almost any Airbus or Boeing aircraft over any Embraer aircraft for the cornerstone reason that the Airbus A220 is one of the supported models for the Delta Studio in-flight navigation/entertainment system.
People, e195 is a regional jet, A220 is a medium to longer range jet, can fly to Europe from eastern North America, e190 can not, most airlines are replacing Embraer with A220.
My airline KLM is actually replacing 737-700’s with the e195-e2 and is super happy about its efficiency. In addition most airlines are adding A320-321 to replace smaller aircraft
Although the E2 is newer the A220 is more comfortable for me as a passenger. We have both types in Switzerland and I flow with both multiple time and talked with pilots: without a doubt the A220 wins by far
It depends on me. As a passenger the E2 is quieter. For airlines for short routes I would choose E2 for the greater efficiency on those routes. Now if you are going to take long but low-demand routes, airbus will be the option.
@@sergiolaurencio7534 but then why people say Embraer is more silent lmfao if the same engine, probably not much difference in sound insulation of the cabin, also A220 was written as less fuel burn per km with the same passenger number, then how could it be less efficient lmfaooo, this video got some data wrong
I love the business class layout, 2 - 2 of the E 2.
I like the Embraer Jets very much! 😎
Both planes are beautiful in their own ways
The E2´s wing shape is something so beautiful. There is an old saying among engineers: beauty follow function.
Beautiful wings indeed
This is a relative issue, which will determine the best option will depend on the model pre established by the company. The E2 is a quieter aircraft, and has an economic advantage when it comes to regional flights, the A220 has greater capacity related to fuel, being able to carry out long distance flights. In terms of comfort, the E2 stands out in this regard, it is worth mentioning that there is no tight plane, this issue of distance between the seats will be defined by the airline, as the E2 is configured 2-2, it is superior to the A220 in terms of comfort, it is worth mentioning that the E2s are cheaper aircraft than the A220.
yes, E195-E2 deserves more
I think A220 beats E2, but the price difference is huge, since A220 is 33% more expensive. So, all in all, E2 has the best cost-benefit.
hey, I think the 220 have not change with that 2-3 configuration against a more quit 2-2 e195-2,, the 220 is better for money in my opinions
But the A220 has another 600,700 miles more range than the E2's. I saw the interior of both planes. I prefer the A220's
Airlines hardly pay list price.
My opinion Embraer is a Rolex off aircraft❤
The 195E2 kills the A220 with an unbeatable cost-benefit ratio. Autonomy is not relevant since they are regional jets.
They’re not regional. Both of the aircraft have more than 100 seat capacity, so they’re considered short-medium range
3400 Nm of range, 140 seats and ETOPS certification makes the A220-300 not a regional plane at all
I love the A220 but I would like to see Embraer make an ER version of its E2-195 to have the same range.
The seats are too small for longer range, any flight over 2 hrs is very uncomfortable
@@richardbanks6025 the airline which operates such flights can order more space for seats
@@jeomirit order more space?
@@richardbanks6025 yes
@@jeomirit you mean fewer seats?
Each aircraft has a specific purpose. Me as a client I must define what I want... If I want low cost, less noise and maintenance, more profit, etc., then, I will choose E195-E2.
same, the E195-E2 deserves more
People forget that the E-2 is not called profit hunter for nothing. To flies with 90-120 passengers, a great majority for those jets, the E-2 is just 40% more lucrative, fuel per passenger (-25%) and maintenance being the main reason.
The E2, in terms of cost effective, is my favorite.
Fuel consumption is amazing.
The Embraer remains the best for short haul flights.
E2 just makes more sense
Emb e2 the best !!! Is beautifull
6 years ago : Flying a 747-400 from New York to London. Capacity 400+
6 years Into the Future : A-220 neo from New York to London. 160+
E2 simply makes a lot more sense
Embraer wins (my opinion)
The A220 was originally Bombardier's C series aircraft, and Airbus bought it from Bombardier. To me, the A220 looks better, but 195 E2 is the more economical option.
E2 looks better from the front with those oversized engines
Sin dudas Embraer E 195 E2 , es muy superior .
It has shorter range. But better in every other way
E195 E2
for regional service, E2 is the best. Autonomy is suitable for the vast majority of routes, its cost per seat is lower.
is an airplane that has more care in the project, as different wings for each version, for better efficiency, not having a single wing for all versions like the airbus model. So much so that it has the lowest noise level.
ACJ 220 if I were to choose only for longer, low-demand routes, where greater autonomy would be decisive.
The reports of the companies that use the E2 show that it exceeds the efficiency gain promised by Embraer in some points.
The E2 is much quieter inside the cabin.
A220 More performance
E2 Low costs
Did I miss the price per unit? In terms of range and capacity (only 3 ,ore seats), the Airbus is better. If the price of the E2 is significantly lower then the A220, so its a better aircraft for short flights.
About 20 million cheaper than the Airbus
As long as they do not slam into the ground at 500 miles an hour I am good with any of them😊
They're not Boeing 😂
ah, 2 planes from the Americas. Embraer is Brazilian while the A220 isn't actually an Airbus development. it's Bombardier CSeries which EADS bought on the cheap.
So, why is the A220 outselling the E2 greater than 2-1? Manufacturers list price is irrelevant. Final price is what the purchaser negotiates with the manufacturer. The E2 is a regional airliner. The 220 has the potential for medium to longer range operation, including trans Atlantic and trans continental - a much more flexible platform. If I was buying one as a personal aircraft, I'd buy an E2 purely on price alone and add long range tanks in the cargo holds. If I'm an airline, it would be the 220 hands down.
E 195 > A 220
fax
True
I hate working on both of them... Working with a 320 is so much easier 😂
A220 is my choice...overall in every category beats ,and if you look why is A220 more expensive is Engines, It has 2 more engines, which is SAFETY!
You must be thinking of the Airbus A380. The A220 doesn't have four engines. Or are you saying the 195 E2 has no engines?
The workout videos I use play this same music.
I wonder how many A320s are being cannibalised by the A220. Also a problem for the B737. Meanwhile we see B737 crossing The Atlantic instead of the big two aisle planes.
There is probably a lot of markets for the cheaper E195 in Africa and Asia.
Todos os videos comparando aeronaves brasileiras tem uma notavel particularidade de sempre desqualificar......esta nitido o desespero das fabricantes air bus e3 boeing......com o vira latas da americca latina......é infinitamente superior os custos e vantagens de uso para uma compania aerea......os embraer são economicos.....manutenção barata.....os gringos estão se cagando de medo das companias adotarem aviãos brasileiros.... vou so relembrar esses gringos tanga frouxa ....aqui é Santos Dumont.....O resto é avião de estilingue.....
Embraer é muito bonito
CSeries aka A220-300 HANDS DOWN !!!
The more expensive, less efficient plane?
One missing piece of info : the E195-E2 outsells the A220-100 by a nearly 2 factor
yeah but then there is the A220-300 which alone outsells Embraer like nearly 5 factor lol
@@legenydnot in the same class. 300 is a bigger plane with more passengers
A220, nice
Embraer puede llegar my lejos
I will always prefer flying on almost any Airbus or Boeing aircraft over any Embraer aircraft for the cornerstone reason that the Airbus A220 is one of the supported models for the Delta Studio in-flight navigation/entertainment system.
Definetly A220
People, e195 is a regional jet, A220 is a medium to longer range jet, can fly to Europe from eastern North America, e190 can not, most airlines are replacing Embraer with A220.
My airline KLM is actually replacing 737-700’s with the e195-e2 and is super happy about its efficiency. In addition most airlines are adding A320-321 to replace smaller aircraft
Although the E2 is newer the A220 is more comfortable for me as a passenger. We have both types in Switzerland and I flow with both multiple time and talked with pilots: without a doubt the A220 wins by far
And have you flown the e195 cause you sound very biased
Embraer the best.
A220
My choice is airbus a220 ♥️
It depends on me.
As a passenger the E2 is quieter.
For airlines for short routes I would choose E2 for the greater efficiency on those routes.
Now if you are going to take long but low-demand routes, airbus will be the option.
@@andersonwenceslau I like the A319 for long routes but I’m sure the A200 is just as good.
@@andersonwenceslau I've been on both. The Bombardier is more quiet.
What
✈🛩🛫🛬
The A220-100 is a new aircraft designing from scratch from the 21st century, the E195-E2 is an improved design from the late 20th century
The E2 is wrong in all the right places, like fuel burn and range
they are not, have the same engines and the e95 use less fuel with mean is more efficient.
Its more efficient then the a220
@@sergiolaurencio7534 but then why people say Embraer is more silent lmfao if the same engine, probably not much difference in sound insulation of the cabin, also A220 was written as less fuel burn per km with the same passenger number, then how could it be less efficient lmfaooo, this video got some data wrong
Embraer 195 is a shit. They are broken half of the time