हमारा संविधान दुनिया का बेहतरीन संविधान है । इसको हर आदमी तक पहुँचाने के कोशिश नहीं की गई है । दूरदर्शन को धारावाहिक बनाकर जनता के सामने रखना चाहिये था । बहुत अच्छा काम रवीश जी फ़ैज़ान साहब आपका धन्यवाद ।
Wt type of secularism . muslim has personal law board and govt can't enter non hindus religion place and they have rights to make committe or organisation of religion and hindus doesn't have right to own temple govt control hindu temples money. This is not equality and this is unequality
@Harshith Subramaniam I have no problem muslim don't allows non muslim to enter mosque .Bt i sayþ why govt is controlling hindu temples and hindu temples property and govt uses hindu temple money for non hindus works.
@@DipakBose-bq1vv You need to read the constituent assembly debates. It may not have been in the Preamble before then, but it is definitely a part of our constitutional values, and the people who made the Constitution believed it to be essential.
@@DipakBose-bq1vv It is part of our basic structure as decided by the biggest bench of the Supreme Court, Keshavanda Bharti vs Union of India. You can't amend it even if you had majority in every Central and state body. I
Ghanta ...chutiya hai sab musalman. Jab tak minority mai hai tab tak secular chilayenge, jab majority mai aa jayenge to saria laga denge. 57 muslim country hai kitne democracy hai.... isiliye lecture na de...🤣🤣🤣
@@amritKumar-fk4uq Democracy means people select their leaders and these leader make laws in accordance with what people want. Islam doesn’t believe in Western Democracy. As in Islam the laws put forth by Allah in Quran are absolute and can’t be changed. As for electing leader who will enforce the laws prescribed by Sharia. Islam believes that a thief is not equal to a cop, a rapist or fraud is not equal to a preacher or a teacher. This equality is the essence of western democracy which is not acceptable in Islam. Moreover the elect should work on public interest even if its for non muslims. So every aspect should be partial, even of a government want to bring any change in society he should inform public or before going to war with any nation. So the Quran gives you right to select your leaders among the best not some hateful warmonger criminal.
@@amritKumar-fk4uq thats why i explained but you only saw the Western democracy who ultimately use government as their puppet instead helping public they help only crony capitalism
This constitution should be read in all the theatres so that we the people realise our preamble. Realise our history, realise the sacrifice, realise the brotherhood.
Faizan Mustafa Doesn't know about the word secular under the Indian constitution he must go through CAD he will come to know why framers of the constitution dropped the word secular from the constitution.
It's really a matter of great concern that we don't understand the real meaning of secularism mentioned in our constitution and this term is used by different political and sectional groups of our society in their own way. A nice episode Ravish Sir on this topic.👍
Cartman san In our constitution secularism is not just used to signify the complete separation of state with the church but an equal respect for all religion. But nowadays this tendency is hardly see in our political and social groups.
First thing you should know is Pakistan is created carving out of India on the demand of Muslims. So, Muslims who are still living in I Dia should migreat to their country. " Pakistan bhi chaahiye aur Hindustan Ko bhi Pakistan banakar tabdeel karna chahiye " ye ab chaltaa nahi. Qu ki ye Modi sarkar hai.
@@srinivasarao7145 pakistan was created due to communism riots wasnt only a result of muslim league but if you read also hindu mahasabha. pakistan was a new state who decided to be a religion state. India on the contrary decided to stay true to its soul and be accomodating. if what you say happens then india would not be what it was supposed to be anymore but a hindu pakistan, no sensible indian stands for it. Inquilab zindabad
गणतंत्र अब नहीं ,मोदी तंत्र और अमित शाह तंत्र हो गया आर यस यस तंत्र हो गया सुप्रीम कोर्ट खतम हाईकोर्ट खतम पुलिस खतम सेना खतम अब सिर्फ मोदी और अमित शाह रहेंगे इस देश मे और आर यस यस रहेगा बाकी कुछ नहीं |
Constitution and Indian Legal System: Know this: The Indian Legal System (The word JUSTICE) comes from the Justinian Code. Justinian was a Roman emperor that converted to Christianity. India never had written laws. "The Hindu Code Bill" was the first time Indian woman also got property lights. This made SATI unnecessary. Gandhi used it to fight for independence. Rumor has it that was keen to convert to Christianity. Many Indians do not know that. Most certainly, these people are of the opinion that the Constructionism an Indian creation. Let us THANK Brittan for it.
16:43 ; the ‘socialist’ agenda of Indira was an attempt to achieve substantive equality and it did achieve the same to a larger extent but that went against the private interests of the Bania-bamman cabal which than resorted to religious extremism which continuous to grow even now unabated ….Emergency may hv its pitfalls but it also worked in the interests of the common man ….
Just like Israel does not have any written constitution. Ravish Kumar I have great respect for your excellent and honest presentation and reporting but such hard and Sanskrit words that it is very hard on us or who knows common Hindi language to understand. Please my request to you to tone down a little so every one of us can understand. Thank you
we dont need special acts in our constitution is well we need a uniform civil code to be just with all without being biased with their gender , we also dont need waqf boards , personal law boards when we have courts and constitution but such paraller system is never questioned even by such raputated and self claimed unbiased and protector of democracy as ndtv
आज 2021 में लोग सेकुलर लोगो से नाराज है, क्योंकि सेकुलर लोग धर्म को न्याय करने वाला , समानता देने वाला नही मानते। और लोग सेकुलरिज्म को हटाकर अपने अपने धर्म की मूढ़ता को भारत के संविधान में डालना चाहते है। लेकिन सच तो यही है कि, जो पंथ निरपेक्षता का विरोध कर रहा है, वो पंथ निरपेक्षता के महत्व को समझ ही नही पा रहा है। पंथ निरपेक्षता जब नही रहेगी तो तुम्हारा धर्म, मान्यताएं, रूढ़िया ही तुम्हारी दुश्मन बन जायेगी
संविधान सभा ने क्या कभी कही कहां है कि संविधान का मूलभूत ढांचा यह है इसे बदला नहीं जा सकता? अगर नहीं कहा है तो सुप्रीम कोर्ट यह मूलभूत ढांचे की बात अपनी तरफ से क्यों कह रही है? सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने क्या कभी मूलभूत ढांचे ढांचे की परिभाषा की है? सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कभी भी समग्र रूप से यह नहीं कहा है कि संविधान का मूलभूत ढांचा यह है,ऐसा क्यों?
Ek bano Nek bano Rastradharm se rastranirman. Rajghatna ko rastradharm ka darja deke uske antargat jatidharm bhedmukt nagrikta ke madhyam se prashaskiy dharm ka nirman Kar Aprashaskiy dharmo ka palan manwata ke saath karneka swatantra dena hoga aur dharmik swatantra ko dhyan me rakh ke acha system chalana hoga. Global Conference Party Of India. For global citizen ship act. As will as TO MANTAIN ISO ON standard and WSO standard.😅
We the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic and to secure to all its citizens: Justice; social, economic and political Liberty; of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship Equality; of status and of opportunity Fraternity; assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of nation in our constituent assembly, this 26th day of November 1949, do hereby adopt, enact and give to ourselves, this Constitution
Doctor Faizan Mustafa साहब संविधान विशेषज्ञ हैं कानून विशेषज्ञ लेकिन संविधान के विषय में उनका विश्लेषण गोलमोल है क्लीन नहीं है। संविधान की प्रस्तावना ना तो यह उद्देश्य का है ना प्रस्तावना केवल जद्दा का संकल्प मात्र है जिसे प्रस्तावना का नाम दिया गया है।
17:50 ; ur wrong mr faizan when u utter that ‘Hitler ne jo kiya voh aaj possible nahi hai’ … the pm is getting directly involved in instigating communalism since he became cm of Gujarat …
Basic structures of Indian Constitution can not be amended. How Secularism included though Constitutional amendment in 1976 ? How Supreme Court was silent at that time ?
The world secular was added to the preamble of the constitution by the constitutional amendment but before the amendment also india was a secular country because of the religious rights given under article 25 in the chapter of fundamental rights which are part of original constitution therefore the basic structure always included secularism and though the 42nd constitutional amendment the basic structure was not amended and also the basic structure doctrine was evolved by the supreme court in 1976 after the keshvanand bharti case and Supreme court upheld the amendment because it did not violate the basic structure because supreme in s.r bommi case declared secularism as part of basic structure.
Sir preamble is an introduction to the constitution . A constitution may or may not have preamble. Preamble is just an ornamental part of the constitution. It in unenforceable in the court of law. But if u see in the preamble the word " socialist " is also mentioned but India is not a socialist country because Indian constitution provides fundamental rights and fundamental rights are features of liberal countries. Therefore mentioning something in the preamble does not make it an essential part or part of basic structure. Secularism is not due its mention in the preamble but in the enforceable part of the constitution that is the right to religion under fundamental rights. Non violence is an idea of Gandhi and mahatma buddha , every state has its machinery to fight with violence. But for security purposes state itself has to do voilence, therefore it is not a desirable idea for any state to be non - voilent but for citizens it can be an aspiration to become non - violent in social and personal life.
@@Legalandconstitutional_ it is a demand of Odisha CM Naveen Patnaik to include Non- violence in the preamble of Constitution of India in this year celebrating 150 th birth anniversary, is it possible or not ? If possible how ? I think it would be through a constitutional amendment Bill to be passed in the Parliament.
I would ask you to explore what exactly is a constitution and when did constitution, not just in Indian context, come into public debate. That should answer your question on what should/shouldn’t be included.
Please make a report on police reform ,day by day increasing custodial death of poor and backward prisoners in India politicians don't raise this issues because these poor exploited groups are not vote banks for them
Increasing custodial death of poor backward prisoners ??? Oh my !! Please refer cases .. Raveesh ji will jump into and ensure they all get justice. After all, its not about his rape accused congressman brother where he does not even utter a word. :D
Jab desh ki 80% aabaadi azaadi ke samay manusmriti ke karan Anpadh-gawar rakkhi gayi ho us deshka savvidhan agar likhit na hota toh manuwadi aur baimani kartey
हमारा संविधान दुनिया का बेहतरीन संविधान है । इसको हर आदमी तक पहुँचाने के कोशिश नहीं की गई है । दूरदर्शन को धारावाहिक बनाकर जनता के सामने रखना चाहिये था । बहुत अच्छा काम रवीश जी फ़ैज़ान साहब आपका धन्यवाद ।
Even today, after 2 years, the question of secularism is under threat and everything you said still makes sense
Wt type of secularism . muslim has personal law board and govt can't enter non hindus religion place and they have rights to make committe or organisation of religion and hindus doesn't have right to own temple govt control hindu temples money. This is not equality and this is unequality
@Harshith Subramaniam I have no problem
muslim don't allows non muslim to enter mosque .Bt i sayþ why govt is controlling hindu temples and hindu temples property and govt uses hindu temple money for non hindus works.
@Harshith Subramaniam why there is nothing called seculariam first of all according to original constituition
@@AkashGupta-cq5ri original constitution me to CAA NRC NAHI HAI
Excellent discussion
True
Absolute need of the hour!
Super like to the video!
U r vry beautiful lady....
रवीश कुमार जी फ़ैज़ान साहब को अपने मंच पर लाते रहिऐ और हमारी जानकारी बढ़ाते रहिऐ , धन्यवाद ।
Faizan shaheb ka youtube channel (faizan mustafa) hai waha se gyan argit kijiye
आप Islam को parhiye
Faizan Mustafa is a scholar on Indian Constitutional matters.
I love our constitution.
गूढ़ संवैधानिक धारणाओं को स्पष्टतापूर्वक बताने में फैजान साहब की समानता नहीं है ।
Long lives Ambedkar' Constitution.
Secularism is not there in the Constitution; it was imposed by the Muslim president of India during the emergency rule of Indira Gandhi.
@@DipakBose-bq1vv You need to read the constituent assembly debates. It may not have been in the Preamble before then, but it is definitely a part of our constitutional values, and the people who made the Constitution believed it to be essential.
@@DipakBose-bq1vv It is part of our basic structure as decided by the biggest bench of the Supreme Court, Keshavanda Bharti vs Union of India. You can't amend it even if you had majority in every Central and state body. I
@@samidhchoudhury5809 no is not in original constituition and we can amend it the bill is passed by both houses
@@siddharthm285 it is a myth secularisn is false
Tow great personality of our nation!!!
Ravish Kumar & Faizan Mustafa. Sahab-e-Kamal aur Fakhr-e- Hindustan hain........!!
True that
@@pritisingh-xy2xi true
Good
Bhakt toh sabhi hote h bas bhagwan badal jate h
Hats of to Ravish Kumar and a big gratitude to Prof Faizan Mustafa Sahab.
Ravish ji aapke 👌 sawal fiezan mustafa sd k 👍 jawab 👏 👏 👏 👏 sanvidhan ko khoobsoorti se samjhaya 💖 se👍
Shukriya
Sir Faizan Mustafa have real Hero of Law field.
You are inspiration of all law students. He very hard worker person.
One of the best Hindi television programs I have watched!!!
Thank you..... You are great persons
Allah Faizan saheb k Faiz ko public k liye aam kare
Faizan sab most knowledgeable person.Hats off.
Ghanta ...chutiya hai sab musalman.
Jab tak minority mai hai tab tak secular chilayenge, jab majority mai aa jayenge to saria laga denge.
57 muslim country hai kitne democracy hai.... isiliye lecture na de...🤣🤣🤣
@@amritKumar-fk4uq Democracy means people select their leaders and these leader make laws in accordance with what people want.
Islam doesn’t believe in Western Democracy. As in Islam the laws put forth by Allah in Quran are absolute and can’t be changed.
As for electing leader who will enforce the laws prescribed by Sharia. Islam believes that a thief is not equal to a cop, a rapist or fraud is not equal to a preacher or a teacher. This equality is the essence of western democracy which is not acceptable in Islam.
Moreover the elect should work on public interest even if its for non muslims. So every aspect should be partial, even of a government want to bring any change in society he should inform public or before going to war with any nation.
So the Quran gives you right to select your leaders among the best not some hateful warmonger criminal.
@@apersontonguecantell ha dikha bhai pakistan mai... Afghanistan mai syria mai iraq mai iran mai....😂😂😂😂
@@amritKumar-fk4uq thats why i explained but you only saw the Western democracy who ultimately use government as their puppet instead helping public they help only crony capitalism
@@amritKumar-fk4uq azerbaijan democratic hai, Indonesia, Malaysia etc. Atleast do some research
धन्यवाद रविश कुमार जी आपने फैजान मुस्तफा सर जैसे विद्वान के साथ संविधान पर महत्वपूर्ण डिवेट प्रस्तुत की। आपको सैल्यूट ।
Ravish ke questions aur Faizan sahab ke jawab . Bas chalta jai ye show man karta hai
Salute to you,sir
This constitution should be read in all the theatres so that we the people realise our preamble. Realise our history, realise the sacrifice, realise the brotherhood.
I believe the constitution should be taught in schools. An well informed and educated public is the downfall of every corrupt politician.
Thanks for information on the Constitution
Aaj Ki Debet Ravish Jiki
Faizan sir's has described our beautiful constitution in such a simple way with facts ..hats off
good information and knowledge ndtv
Watching u i felt i read a full library with honesty
Wat an intelligent man
Plz upload daily prime time just after tv telecast
Faizan Mustafa Doesn't know about the word secular under the Indian constitution he must go through CAD he will come to know why framers of the constitution dropped the word secular from the constitution.
alphabet sikhne ke baad constitution sikhana chahiye naaki science arts ya commerce
, BJP ne loktantr ka satyanash kar dia h
Excellent discussion............... I love our Constitution........ Salute ravish sir ... Mustafa sir🙏
Ravish ia ONE MAN ARMY...
It's really a matter of great concern that we don't understand the real meaning of secularism mentioned in our constitution and this term is used by different political and sectional groups of our society in their own way.
A nice episode Ravish Sir on this topic.👍
Sriom Sharma - please explain...
Cartman san In our constitution secularism is not just used to signify the complete separation of state with the church but an equal respect for all religion. But nowadays this tendency is hardly see in our political and social groups.
Sriom Sharma - okay, but there must be a core meaning of the word 'secular' right?
What that is?
@@mahatmacharya Really he is one full educated man n he read full history of our India
How nicely he is explained about secularism Mustafa Sir .selute Sir ko..thanks to Ravish ji brought him in ndtv
Thanks a lot sir...
फैज़ान सर - रवीश सर दोनों हमारे देश के बेहतरीन रत्न है आज के, 🙏🙏👌👌
Desh se ham hain
Ndtv love u
Very knowledgeable discourse! Thanks Ravishji!
great discussions
Very good educative talk by Mr. Faijan Mustefa, Congratulations.
Very good sir ji
Two exceptional and extraordinary personalities of.our country!
।रिजर्व ।कूराआन ।।26/आईते।वापैसाखाकर।अंनसं।बकताहे।ईसपर।मै।पूरावाकिया।पतानहिहें।।।नवषकार ।सर।
Bahut accha, good work keep it up.
कुछ भी हो आप दोनों की जोड़ी जमती है
रविश।कूमार जी ।हार्दिक बधाई ऐवोम सूभकामणाऐ ।नयाशाल।।का।धनवाद ।ओर ।फैजान।सर।नयाशाल ।का।
।हार्दिक बधाई ऐवोम सूभकामणाऐ धनवाद नवषकार सर कांग्रेस ।सर।।
Modi & BJP should go through Indian Constitution thoroughly.... May be this myt put some sense into their dung heads...
First thing you should know is Pakistan is created carving out of India on the demand of Muslims. So, Muslims who are still living in I Dia should migreat to their country. " Pakistan bhi chaahiye aur Hindustan Ko bhi Pakistan banakar tabdeel karna chahiye " ye ab chaltaa nahi. Qu ki ye Modi sarkar hai.
@@srinivasarao7145 pakistan was created due to communism riots wasnt only a result of muslim league but if you read also hindu mahasabha. pakistan was a new state who decided to be a religion state. India on the contrary decided to stay true to its soul and be accomodating. if what you say happens then india would not be what it was supposed to be anymore but a hindu pakistan, no sensible indian stands for it. Inquilab zindabad
गणतंत्र अब नहीं ,मोदी तंत्र और अमित शाह तंत्र हो गया आर यस यस तंत्र हो गया सुप्रीम कोर्ट खतम हाईकोर्ट खतम पुलिस खतम सेना खतम अब सिर्फ मोदी और अमित शाह रहेंगे इस देश मे और आर यस यस रहेगा बाकी कुछ नहीं |
Constitution and Indian Legal System:
Know this:
The Indian Legal System (The word JUSTICE) comes from the Justinian Code. Justinian was a Roman emperor that converted to Christianity.
India never had written laws. "The Hindu Code Bill" was the first time Indian woman also got property lights. This made SATI unnecessary.
Gandhi used it to fight for independence. Rumor has it that was keen to convert to Christianity.
Many Indians do not know that. Most certainly, these people are of the opinion that the Constructionism an Indian creation.
Let us THANK Brittan for it.
THE GREAT Raviah kumaar show.. one man army show... jai Bheem
Ranjan Gigoi,'s arm was twisted well before failing the Constitution and the nation as in Article 5..371..Etc
।रविश कूमार जी ।फैजान ।साहब।जी।सर।हार्दिक बधाई ऐवोम सूभकामणाऐ धनवाद काग्रेस मूबारकबाद ।हो।अस्सलामालेकूम ।रहमतूलाहेबरकातहू ।
बहुत खूब सर
Hats of to Ravish Kumar and a big gratitude to Prof Faizan Mustafa Sahab.
16:43 ; the ‘socialist’ agenda of Indira was an attempt to achieve substantive equality and it did achieve the same to a larger extent but that went against the private interests of the Bania-bamman cabal which than resorted to religious extremism which continuous to grow even now unabated ….Emergency may hv its pitfalls but it also worked in the interests of the common man ….
Just like Israel does not have any written constitution. Ravish Kumar I have great respect for your excellent and honest presentation and reporting but such hard and Sanskrit words that it is very hard on us or who knows common Hindi language to understand. Please my request to you to tone down a little so every one of us can understand. Thank you
This very good news. It's very knowledgeable and informative. news
संविधान में जब धर्म निरपेक्ष शब्द नहीं था तब भी संविधान धर्म निरपेक्ष ही था सही जानकारी
Excellently explained by Mr Faizan Mustafa.this combination of Ravishji & Mr Faizan is always very knowledgeable & helpfull.
we dont need special acts in our constitution is well we need a uniform civil code to be just with all without being biased with their gender , we also dont need waqf boards , personal law boards when we have courts and constitution but such paraller system is never questioned even by such raputated and self claimed unbiased and protector of democracy as ndtv
आज 2021 में लोग सेकुलर लोगो से नाराज है, क्योंकि सेकुलर लोग धर्म को न्याय करने वाला , समानता देने वाला नही मानते।
और लोग सेकुलरिज्म को हटाकर अपने अपने धर्म की मूढ़ता को भारत के संविधान में डालना चाहते है।
लेकिन सच तो यही है कि, जो पंथ निरपेक्षता का विरोध कर रहा है, वो पंथ निरपेक्षता के महत्व को समझ ही नही पा रहा है।
पंथ निरपेक्षता जब नही रहेगी तो तुम्हारा धर्म, मान्यताएं, रूढ़िया ही तुम्हारी दुश्मन बन जायेगी
रवीश जी शुभ प्रभात आपने बहुत अच्छी बात चीत की। बहुत कुछ सीखने को समझने।को। मिला। संविधान।ने। हमें। जीने का रहने का। काम करने का मौका दिया है धन्यवाद
deshko Faizan sir ki bahot jarurot hai
संविधान सभा ने क्या कभी कही कहां है कि संविधान का मूलभूत ढांचा यह है इसे बदला नहीं जा सकता? अगर नहीं कहा है तो सुप्रीम कोर्ट यह मूलभूत ढांचे की बात अपनी तरफ से क्यों कह रही है? सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने क्या कभी मूलभूत ढांचे ढांचे की परिभाषा की है? सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कभी भी समग्र रूप से यह नहीं कहा है कि संविधान का मूलभूत ढांचा यह है,ऐसा क्यों?
सेकूलर।होगया।नेकूलर।बनादिया।हे।सर।जी।नवषकार धनवाद
Karan Thapar's counterpart with the same guy.
Ek bano Nek bano
Rastradharm se rastranirman.
Rajghatna ko rastradharm ka darja deke uske antargat jatidharm bhedmukt nagrikta ke madhyam se prashaskiy dharm ka nirman Kar Aprashaskiy dharmo ka palan manwata ke saath karneka swatantra dena hoga aur dharmik swatantra ko dhyan me rakh ke acha system chalana hoga.
Global Conference Party Of India.
For global citizen ship act. As will as
TO MANTAIN ISO ON standard and WSO standard.😅
Not sure when you will stop teaching constitution to others rather following it.
Savidhaan ki jankkari ke liye dhnywad apko ravish & faizan mustafa sahab thanks
फैज़ांन सर का जवाब नहीं। उनके आर्टिकल मैं बार बार सुनता हूँ
कया फैजान मुस्तफा साहब का मोबाइल नंबर मिलेगा?
मुझे N.R.Cकी कुछ जानकारी चाहिए था।
धन्यवाद।
Unke video dekh lo youtube par.
Ek urban jihadi secular kya he samjhata he, muslimn ko bolo wo pehele secular bane
We the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic
and to secure to all its citizens:
Justice; social, economic and political
Liberty; of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship
Equality; of status and of opportunity
Fraternity; assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of nation
in our constituent assembly, this 26th day of November 1949, do hereby adopt, enact and give to ourselves, this Constitution
Gou me to juta music industry ko gayeb kardiya. Fibre plastic
Doctor Faizan Mustafa साहब संविधान विशेषज्ञ हैं कानून विशेषज्ञ लेकिन संविधान के विषय में उनका विश्लेषण गोलमोल है क्लीन नहीं है। संविधान की प्रस्तावना ना तो यह उद्देश्य का है ना प्रस्तावना केवल जद्दा का संकल्प मात्र है जिसे प्रस्तावना का नाम दिया गया है।
Nice and informative discussion.
17:50 ; ur wrong mr faizan when u utter that ‘Hitler ne jo kiya voh aaj possible nahi hai’ … the pm is getting directly involved in instigating communalism since he became cm of Gujarat …
Common Civil Code Bina kaise samanta ho Sakti ?
Basic structures of Indian Constitution can not be amended. How Secularism included though Constitutional amendment in 1976 ? How Supreme Court was silent at that time ?
The world secular was added to the preamble of the constitution by the constitutional amendment but before the amendment also india was a secular country because of the religious rights given under article 25 in the chapter of fundamental rights which are part of original constitution therefore the basic structure always included secularism and though the 42nd constitutional amendment the basic structure was not amended and also the basic structure doctrine was evolved by the supreme court in 1976 after the keshvanand bharti case and Supreme court upheld the amendment because it did not violate the basic structure because supreme in s.r bommi case declared secularism as part of basic structure.
@@Legalandconstitutional_ Now there will be no problem in adding non- violence in preamble of Constitution of India ?
Sir preamble is an introduction to the constitution . A constitution may or may not have preamble. Preamble is just an ornamental part of the constitution. It in unenforceable in the court of law. But if u see in the preamble the word " socialist " is also mentioned but India is not a socialist country because Indian constitution provides fundamental rights and fundamental rights are features of liberal countries. Therefore mentioning something in the preamble does not make it an essential part or part of basic structure. Secularism is not due its mention in the preamble but in the enforceable part of the constitution that is the right to religion under fundamental rights. Non violence is an idea of Gandhi and mahatma buddha , every state has its machinery to fight with violence. But for security purposes state itself has to do voilence, therefore it is not a desirable idea for any state to be non - voilent but for citizens it can be an aspiration to become non - violent in social and personal life.
@@Legalandconstitutional_ it is a demand of Odisha CM Naveen Patnaik to include Non- violence in the preamble of Constitution of India in this year celebrating 150 th birth anniversary, is it possible or not ? If possible how ? I think it would be through a constitutional amendment Bill to be passed in the Parliament.
I would ask you to explore what exactly is a constitution and when did constitution, not just in Indian context, come into public debate. That should answer your question on what should/shouldn’t be included.
Please make a report on police reform ,day by day increasing custodial death of poor and backward prisoners in India politicians don't raise this issues because these poor exploited groups are not vote banks for them
Increasing custodial death of poor backward prisoners ??? Oh my !! Please refer cases .. Raveesh ji will jump into and ensure they all get justice. After all, its not about his rape accused congressman brother where he does not even utter a word. :D
Still this debate remains relevant
I love french version of secularism.
Ae Kash Ravish g you become a muslim
Jab desh ki 80% aabaadi azaadi ke samay manusmriti ke karan Anpadh-gawar rakkhi gayi ho us deshka savvidhan agar likhit na hota toh manuwadi aur baimani kartey
Our Constitution is good. We need Sambidhanbad not autocratic govt.
हमतौखरिद।करजमाकरदेगै।सर।जादानहिंचिहाई।सर।आपकिगाड़ि।।नवषकार धनवाद सर
This is the true spirit of the constitution. Thanks Ravish Kumar for the show.
In WB ,ALL THE BOOKS BEAR PREAMBLE
🌷👌🌷
Exllent sir ... Savidhan per de jaankary ke lite..Namaskar ravish sir ko....
Jaankary ke leeye..
Sir I'm in a confusion regarding amendment 2003 please explain sir
Hass to aise rahe jaise ke bahut hi bada medal liye hai,ye nahi pata ke apne par bore hokar hasi me chhipa rahe chor ko
Good
Please stop the music. It's very distracting.
गीता और समबिधान के किताब हर धर होना चाहिए
Is pakistani ko nahi bulana chahiye
Ui XX
एक कदम संविधान की ओर
fazan is looks reasonable man and reasonable