ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

Prof. Paul Guyer - Hume, Kant, and the Passion for Reason

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ม.ค. 2012
  • "Hume, Kant, and the Passion for Reason" by Professor Paul Guyer was presented as part of the prestigious Edinburgh Philosophy lecture series, the Nature of Knowledge Lectures.

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @ryanjavierortega8513
    @ryanjavierortega8513 12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dr. Guyer was by far the Greatest Professor that I have ever had. It is terribly saddening that he has left Pennsylvania.

  • @chandraraj9092
    @chandraraj9092 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Guyer is brilliant! I enjoy his books!

  • @benny742
    @benny742 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, Paul. Thanks for submitting your oral presentation for PHIL111. While your content was accurate, it was phenomenally and breathtakingly stark. The task of the assignment was to give a brief two minute overview of Hume, Kant, and the Passion for Reason, yet, Paul - you literally READ WORDS FOR ONE HOUR. I actually do appreciate that you looked up from time to time and the hand gestures were very convincing, but .....I actually have no words. Only letters. Paul this is a very generous: C-. Please make sure to READ THE BRIEF before submitting next time. Good luck for the rest of your first year here at The University of Edinburgh

  • @bindon8581
    @bindon8581 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hume thinks we use passionate rationaiisation; and hopefully through calm or clear thinking.
    Kant thinks there is a Categorical Objective: to "love everyone as yourself."
    Is that right?

  • @Cellardoor187
    @Cellardoor187 11 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Exactly... Perhaps he's uncomfortable with the uncertainty of not having his speech literally physically in front of him. He relies on sense experience I guess.

    • @mafs5150
      @mafs5150 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I found this comment funny, haha

  • @11889music
    @11889music 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At certain points, I felt that the speaker had not prepared properly for this event. Perhaps he was up late watching the Tree of Life play he mentions.

  • @AshleyGrante-fe5yv
    @AshleyGrante-fe5yv ปีที่แล้ว

    Very cool place for serious students

  • @hishamfahmy6169
    @hishamfahmy6169 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I hate a lecturer who solely reads out his lecture 😒

    • @Hokumai444
      @Hokumai444 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are right. I hate too.

  • @roberttristan7817
    @roberttristan7817 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    i loved it.Gr8

  • @zhang2011xiang
    @zhang2011xiang 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I personally don't like his starting sentence -" Now, done to business".

    • @parlormusic1885
      @parlormusic1885 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Xiang Zhang Yea dinna lack the accent, heh?

  • @ArumesYT
    @ArumesYT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have to agree with most of the other comments. Next time just publish the 'lecture' as a PDF or something, I don't need someone else to read it to me. Let alone in such a boring way.

    • @channelmoved9096
      @channelmoved9096 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wish there were more videos like this. I can put headphones on and have someone read me a lecture while I clean or fix things.

  • @cr38961
    @cr38961 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lecturers should be made to do some teacher training. What is the point of a lecture? If you are trying to communicate facts why not write them down and hand them out? If you are trying to explain something how will you know when you have succeeded? When the students can relate your explanation, or a version of it? When they can manipulate the explanation? If you are trying to socialise them into understanding human discourse this, patently, isn't discourse.....and so on, and so on, and so...

  • @stallebrass
    @stallebrass 10 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Rubbish lecture... he read practically the whole time!

  • @ahmadkhan-nu2zm
    @ahmadkhan-nu2zm ปีที่แล้ว

    He is just reading out loud from the paper!

  • @garetcrosman3628
    @garetcrosman3628 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pointless *lecture*. We are already engulfed by the written word.

  • @Philiopantheon82
    @Philiopantheon82 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is the most monotonous boring lecture i have listened to on youtube, no offense to the professor but this was more like a lecture on Geography or history than philosophy!! Never derailed from the subject matter, no useful gesture or funs to make the listeners more elated. Philosophy is deep and that depth should be taken as a whole not just by reading a damn paper, if Kant or Hume were in this lecture i am sure they would have been out of the room after first 15 minutes.

  • @daquidi
    @daquidi 11 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A poor reductionist reading of Kant...

    • @claudioderubertis3170
      @claudioderubertis3170 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      academic dogmatic shit. I suffered trying to read guyer, he is so confusing and too much intellectual masturbations... useless almost.

    • @yamtech2952
      @yamtech2952 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@claudioderubertis3170 who do you prefer?