How to Buy Land in Himachal Pradesh ? || Laws for an Outsiders

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @akshaysharma8940
    @akshaysharma8940 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    I am from Delhi and you are right…do not compromise on demographic changes!
    Uttarakhand is facing major immigration problems since their CM Trivendra singh Rawat removed the land laws completely.

  • @jaisingh_23
    @jaisingh_23 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    मुझे तो ये एक्ट बिल्कुल सही लगा हिमाचल आपने आप में अनोखा है यह की संस्कृति अच्छी कोई भी न्यू चाहेगा की कलाई खतरे में पड़े हम भी आपने हरियाणा के लिए चाहते है इसलिए ये act 100% sahi hai जायज है

  • @bhoopendrakumartomar6655
    @bhoopendrakumartomar6655 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Same Section should be Apply on other all States of India Also,becoz every State has his Land,culture,Language & Environment.

    • @adruvitpandit5816
      @adruvitpandit5816 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bhai Gujarat mein bhi yeh khel hai, har jagah in zameendaro ne gandh machaya hai congress ke time par. Ab dekhte hain Modi ji is kanoon ko khatam karenge ya nahi.

    • @striker4188
      @striker4188 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Agree with you 1000%. Our ancient culture of every state should be preserved.

    • @navdeepverma-zg6vh
      @navdeepverma-zg6vh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To Karo na ...😂 Bihar or Bengal jaisi states mai kon rehna chahega .. baat ho Rahi Himachal mai jagah lene ki

  • @blackking8671
    @blackking8671 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Bro I'm from bihar, I love himachal when I was kids, now I'm in post graduate. Afterall I m strictly agree with you... I love cultures of himachal .... Blessing long live himachal... Himachal is my proud. It's my life..

    • @ramansharma3482
      @ramansharma3482 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I do not like this law

    • @VijayThakurMD
      @VijayThakurMD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ramansharma3482 I understand your feelings bro
      But trust me Himanchal will get polluted and over populated once immigration starts happening

    • @rajatthakur4860
      @rajatthakur4860 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rockstar02720 😭😭

    • @Himalaya444-q3i
      @Himalaya444-q3i 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ramansharma3482why

  • @waglebhai4319
    @waglebhai4319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    मैं महाराष्ट्र से हूं और हिमाचल मे बसने की सोच रहा था लेकिन 118 सुन कर अच्छा भी लगा और मायुसी भी हुई । लेकिन हिमाचल जैसा है सदैव वैसा ही रहे सेक्शन 118 नही हटना चाहिए कभी भी मैं उत्तराखंड मे लैंड खरीद कर रह लूंगा या शिमला मे लीज पर या रेंट पर ले लूंगा 🚩🙏देवभूमि हिमाचल को सत सत नमन

  • @gauravhardas1433
    @gauravhardas1433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +237

    हिमाचल और उत्तराखंड जैसी सुंदर जगहों पर औद्योगिकीकरण तो बिल्कुल नहीं होना चाहिए

    • @dipankarbala6080
      @dipankarbala6080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Exacly !

    • @himaniaswal4240
      @himaniaswal4240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Right 👍👍

    • @shashankdabral178
      @shashankdabral178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I'm from Uttarakhand 😊

    • @aj.sh600
      @aj.sh600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Hr jagah sundar aur khaas hai apni apni jagah. Sirf Uttrakhand aur himachal hi nahi. Agr aap meri jagah hote to kaisi lgti ye baat?? Kahin mountain khasiyat hai to kahin paani, to kahin plains (maidaani asthaan). To kya hm log bhi apne jagah pr kuchh naa lagaye?? Aapko hamare badsurat jagahon pr bani cheej aur uska fayada to lena hai lekin apni state me hm logon ko jagah nahi denge. Jaise cement aapko hotel/ghr banaane ke liye, road banaane ke liye, car tourism ke liye chahiye lekin inki factories wo door ki badsurat states me lagni chahiye? Log wahan bhi apne hi hai, ek hi desh ke, aap logon ki zarurate poori hoti hain dusre state ke logon se, unhe bhi apne zarurat ke hisaab se apne state me jagah dena chahiye.

    • @Unofficialjagmohansingh84
      @Unofficialjagmohansingh84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@aj.sh600 dear jitne bhi fresh water yaani peeney k pani k source hai woh Himalayas se hai phir chahe HP ho ya UK ....or koi bhi mountain region....or agar poori india ko future me water crisis nahi jhelna hai toh in jagaho ko bachana hoga even in state me property buy karne k rights bhi nahi hone chahiye.... industry toh dur ki baat hai yeh kuch jagah hi bachi hai jaise 7 sister inko bachana hoga agar aaj nahi bachaya toh hum apne country ki wild life jungle or fresh water se hath dho baithege.....jinki wajah se poore india ko peene ka pani or kissan ko irrigation ka pani milta hai hamare paas resources bahut kam hai or population jayada agar future acha chahte ho toh jo jagah untouched hai unko bachana hoga......wahan polution rokna hoga...or yeh tabhi rukega jab un jagaho pe bheed nahi badegi

  • @ashvinghevariya7543
    @ashvinghevariya7543 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I am from Gujarat....and my complete opinion is section 118 to be continued....
    Himachal ......ko natural hi rehna chahie....aap 100% sahi ho....I love Himachal

  • @hritikjuyal5484
    @hritikjuyal5484 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    4:25 Same is happening in Uttarakhand also. Recently i came to know that in Kumaon someone bought a huge piece of land there. Later he denied people of nearby villages to move through old tracks. Even he is not allowing the road to pass.

    • @exploringnaturalbeauty2102
      @exploringnaturalbeauty2102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bhai Yaar khoon khaul Ra hai

    • @ravindersinghsingh859
      @ravindersinghsingh859 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Government chahe to kabhi bhi compensation dekar land khali kra sakti he
      Property is not fundamental right in Constitution

    • @sanjaysinghbhandari5319
      @sanjaysinghbhandari5319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Uttrakhand m to bhut bura hal ho gaya h😭
      bhu-kanun kb laege sarkar

  • @Vishaltomar155
    @Vishaltomar155 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I am originally from UP,, But I want section 118 should be forever implemented...

    • @thebeast6508
      @thebeast6508 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks bro ..
      We need more people like you

    • @Vishaltomar155
      @Vishaltomar155 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thebeast6508 Welcome Bro...

    • @smulestar
      @smulestar ปีที่แล้ว

      Apartheid practiced by Himachal Pradesh

  • @Way_aboveyour_league
    @Way_aboveyour_league 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Himachal is India's Pride, it should be left untouched. ❤️

    • @adruvitpandit5816
      @adruvitpandit5816 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sahi hai inko development kyon mile? Poora focus to kashmir develop karne mein hi hai?

    • @adruvitpandit5816
      @adruvitpandit5816 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Orange Republic Go and live in Austria.

  • @prarthana3080
    @prarthana3080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    After watching it I feel, is video ka title "you can't buy land in himachal pradesh" honi chahiye thi🤣🤣

  • @chhayaverma7002
    @chhayaverma7002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Land should be given for permanent home (not for holiday home) or agriculture purpose.
    Otherwise industrialization will ruin the beauty and environment.

    • @mdzulfeqarali9634
      @mdzulfeqarali9634 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes yes

    • @BackspasmANDniggle
      @BackspasmANDniggle 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      jobs kha seh aengi?? sbko govt nhi de skte, jb himachal wale bahar jaege firse inhe bhi gaali khani padegi, kam seh ek 2 district jha nature ka presence thoda kam h wha heavy industrialization hona chahiye

  • @shobhanaramachandran4922
    @shobhanaramachandran4922 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Himachal should save its purity and culture. But development can happen in agriculture, roads, tourism for the future of Himachali people. I would want same for India as well. Jai hind

  • @TheWizardprince
    @TheWizardprince 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Thank you for explaining it beautifully! I have a dream of having my mountain home. Now that it is not possible, I can at least get to see the best of Himachal preserved. Let the laws remain as they are and make Himachal even better, greener and safer! Jai Bharat!

  • @AshishSingh-pq4dr
    @AshishSingh-pq4dr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm non himachali brother ❤️rules aur hard hona chaiye jisse koi kuch na kharid paye na land na flat ❤️🙏💐dev bhumi...I love Himachal culture

  • @swadhinsethi15
    @swadhinsethi15 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Protect your culture & environment . Thanks for it information on land reform 1972. Bahut Accha laga hum Himachal ghumne jayenge . Pl guide us. Jai Jagathnath 🙏🙏🙏

  • @panditpcomedy8148
    @panditpcomedy8148 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    हाँ भाई बिल्कुल सही है भारत की culture ही पहचान और culture को बचाना हमारी ही जिम्मेदारी है

  • @DeepakBisht7
    @DeepakBisht7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Uttarakhand also need same land laws with some relaxation....👍👍❤️

  • @gypsyking4234
    @gypsyking4234 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thank you for the informative video Navin.
    I'm from Shimla (well Mandi actually but have never stayed there) and have been living in Canada for the last 20 years. The current laws should stay in place and should not be changed. Himachal has a unique culture and our people are susceptible to manipulation quite easily. We are simple people at heart and we're a small population. Any change in the law will result in our people getting swamped and that will result in Assam like situation. We don't want industrialization in the state. There are several other methods to improve employment in Himachal without necessarily destroying the environment. We have already partially destroyed our beautiful state. Every time I travel to India and drive around in Himachal it breaks my heart to see the concrete structures built by both the Govt & people that are so out of character with the natural surroundings. Our so-called tourist places have become garbage dumps thanks to the callous tourists who have no civic sense. The civic authorities are as out of touch with the ground reality & aspirations of the people as is the state Govt. Thanks to our first chief minister Dr. YS Parmar, we have this law. If we left it to the wisdom of the current breed of politicians this state would have gone to dogs long ago.
    I only recently came across your videos and really liked these. By the way I have stayed in Kullu & Banjar in the late 70s when my father was posted as DFO both at Banjar & Kullu. I would like to meet you on my next trip to India if I travel to Bajoura. Take care, stay safe & keep up the good work!

  • @ARYAN-db8ho
    @ARYAN-db8ho 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    himachal jaisa hai waisa best hai boss 😍

  • @avijitthakur7066
    @avijitthakur7066 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    We do not want technologies and factories in our himachal and this section should stay for our pahadi culture

    • @VikasYadav-gt4pg
      @VikasYadav-gt4pg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I m from delhi and i m agree with u brother koi to asi jagah ho jaha par pollution or population na ho

    • @mobilesuniverse
      @mobilesuniverse 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes, but u should allow othe state people for residential pupose, can use other states for manufactuing and industrilisation purpose.

  • @RahulKumar-dh2xd
    @RahulKumar-dh2xd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A lot of love, regards to This beautiful Himalayan state ''Himachal Pradesh''.

  • @kalpanadash8828
    @kalpanadash8828 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    118 law continue hona chaiye varna ye nature and culture sab kuch khatam ho jayega I am not himachali but my heart himachal 😍

  • @richavaidya5820
    @richavaidya5820 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    This makes total sense... The law must sustain to preserve the culture and natural environment 👍

    • @manpreetchhajli6638
      @manpreetchhajli6638 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      right

    • @Memewala2003
      @Memewala2003 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@manpreetchhajli6638 pppp

    • @exploringnaturalbeauty2102
      @exploringnaturalbeauty2102 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @K D yes I as a uttrakhandi , outsiders are buying land in our state , either remove himachal land law or put in uttrakhand also

    • @exploringnaturalbeauty2102
      @exploringnaturalbeauty2102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @K D but the problem is people from outside buy land in Himalayan villages and then they disrespect the locals and local culture . They try to eradicate it which is the main problem

    • @musiclover3860
      @musiclover3860 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Liberal Indian it is not about who can buy land where? It's about preserving the nature and mountains. India 's forest cover is already very less.

  • @RahulKumar-dh2xd
    @RahulKumar-dh2xd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I am from Bihar but I love Himchal Pradesh a lot.Industrialisation should not be done at the cost of natural beauty. Fresh air,water, mountain, plants are the biggest property of human kind.i support act118 because after removal of this act private companies would buy most of agriculture land from poor farmers.This will lead to decay of Himalayan culture.Pavitra(Holy) place should not be converted into Picnic place.

  • @viratrajput5790
    @viratrajput5790 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai ji Parnaam In future God ne Cacha to sabse phle Mai aapse milna cachunga aapki videos and all U r traditional ko Jo aap bahut hi acche SE persnt krte ho esme koi shak ni hai ki aap apni Janam bhumi se kitna pyaar wa apne traditional ko fallow krte hai har insaan KE liye apna ghr apna traditional pyaara hota hai kyuki Mai kudh ek Hill station se hu to ache SE mehsus or feel kr skta hum pahadi logo ke liye humari Dev bhumi kitni maayne rakhti hai Jo ki Mai smjta hu Hume god gift mili hai Great work Bhai ji and Love U shivoam specially💗💗💗💗💓

  • @kumudinimohanti7297
    @kumudinimohanti7297 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Sorry I was I treated for land but sorry after seeing your video I strongly say that 118 should be strongly lmplemented to protect the deb bhumi n it's serenity.

  • @Rajnish19098
    @Rajnish19098 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Act 118 humesha rehena hi chaiye isme Kabhi bhi koi change Nahin Hona Chahiye ❤️🕉️

  • @Drjasminnanda
    @Drjasminnanda 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The section should stay to maintain the ecosystem of Himachal Pradesh

  • @ManojSingh-qy3jl
    @ManojSingh-qy3jl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bhut accha video banaya h bhai aapne me khud up agra se hu himachal muje bhut pasand me himachal me apna ghar chahta tha lekin me apni khusi ke liye kabhi nahi chaunga ki hamare desh ki itni kubsurat state ke naturalty per koi khatra bane isliye meri soch y ki section 118 hamesha rahna chaiye jisse himachal ki kubsurti ko dekhne ke liye hamari aane vali generation bhi himachal aaye

  • @tapas98.53
    @tapas98.53 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you.Nature should be natural at any cost.

  • @theunknown3879
    @theunknown3879 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Namaste sir..
    Bahot achhi aur mahatwapurn jankari
    share ki hai aapne.. Dhanyawad !!!
    Yah rules jo banaye gaye hai..
    Sach me bahot achha hai..
    Natural o bhi hai achha hai
    Yah bhumi isaliye Devbhoomi hai..
    Pavitra hai..
    🌿🙏
    🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲

    • @theunknown3879
      @theunknown3879 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maharastra aur mumbai ki halat
      Se pata chalega ki kya sthiti hogi..
      Jaisi hai wahi thik hai..
      Nature ka khayal rakhna
      hum sab ki jimnedari haii..
      sir.. Thank you
      Aap k vicharo se puri taraha
      Sahmat hun..
      🙏

  • @kanchansharma5889
    @kanchansharma5889 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    All your points are valid...yes 118 must stay to protect himachali beauty, purity nd culture.

  • @negitejinder2454
    @negitejinder2454 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nice content bhai saab 😊🔥🔥
    I support sec:118 rehna chaiye it will protect the pollution free environment.

  • @dj01cool
    @dj01cool 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Section 118 is imposed in Himachal for future to save his culture & nature but for industry himachal govt give land in lower region like baddi

  • @parveensuhag5449
    @parveensuhag5449 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello mountain family, although I wana apologise first as I missed such a good informative yt channel,
    But I m pleased to watch it later then never.
    Sir now about your views as well as mine.
    I m totally agree with the fact no one should be eligible to buy as outsiders. And as a flat we can buy. But as per my views one more ammendment it needed that even the builders should be also from himachal and with same condition fulfilled. So that the gaint builders cannot enter in devbhoomi 🙏
    As I have seen the builder like dlf, Raheja, rel buildtech and many more like that are doing the same way of industrialisation in a differ way,
    My opinion only ,
    No hard feelings to any one.
    Thanks again for being informative and nature's demand conscious.

  • @mr.khatri6507
    @mr.khatri6507 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Bhai bilkul ye section rehne chaiye jab delhi me dimaag khrab hota hai to ye wadiya he sakoon deti hai me to khud vinti karta hu ki delhi haryana wale jake waha gandagi na failaye

  • @MeghaSharma-xr1im
    @MeghaSharma-xr1im ปีที่แล้ว

    Aapne bohot sahi baat kahi hai, agar industrialisation hua Himachal me to wahan ki khubsurti chali jayegi, or uski wajah se pollution jo badega wo alag...already hamari earth pollution ki problem face kar rahi hai, jo ki ab reverse karna impossible hai..ek jagah jo ab bhi bachi hai Jahan khula saaf aasman dikhta hai, wo nahi dikhega fir..so I totally agree with you..Nice content.

  • @kavitapritesh6624
    @kavitapritesh6624 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This kind of law should be imposed on every state of India so that India will not get populated and it will become pollution free. Love the mother earth 🌍 because nature is beautiful it just gives you it won't take from you anything.

  • @rajibroy1796
    @rajibroy1796 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You are right Bro. Industrialization can be replaced with Agriculture.

  • @Yash-lx2gz
    @Yash-lx2gz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    But due to these restrictions , aren’t most of the young talent moving out for jobs ? At some extent at least the IT sector should be set up . Nalagarh is already hub for pharmaceutical companies . It’s government job to make sure that Himachal’s sanity is not compromised. Definitely not at cost of our himachal’s purity and culture.

  • @mohammadareeqali2576
    @mohammadareeqali2576 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    बहुत ही शानदार भाई मेरे😮😍❤️🔥🙌
    I'm a travel and nature lover 🤩🌿🌴🌳🚙✈️
    😁

  • @getvimlesh
    @getvimlesh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am not from himanchal but i completely support section 118. I dont want devbhoomi of my country to be converted into allabhoomi infested with madarssas like whats started now in uttarakhand. Imagine 5 times azaan happening on loudspeakers in calm & serene himanchal.

    • @VijayThakurMD
      @VijayThakurMD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bhai me Himanchal chamba se hu, or mere ghr ke samne musjid h
      Nafrat ki batien mt kr

    • @monikagupta345
      @monikagupta345 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely right 👍🚩🚩

    • @KeshavSharma-pl7ll
      @KeshavSharma-pl7ll 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@VijayThakurMDtum bhi ready rho katwane ke liye

  • @monikadas6260
    @monikadas6260 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    M a non Himachali and I strongly feel this section should not be removed.. it will be crowded and will arise to scarcity of water 😞also will impact the natural beauty

  • @mm1798
    @mm1798 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    i m from delhi,and bilkul allow nhi karna chaie nhi to yha jesa ho jaega himachal bhi agar allow krdia...yha paise kee kami nhi hai but nature ke bht kami hai..people are frustrated here

  • @himalayanbiker0076
    @himalayanbiker0076 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    118 sec humesha rehna chahiye ye kabhi bhi nahi hatna cahiye tabhi apne Himachal ki Sunder wadiya humesha Sunder hi rahengi Bhai or apke sath humesha pyar bana rahega Naveen bhai Love you forever ❤️👍

  • @ranjujain8159
    @ranjujain8159 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Sec 118 always sustains
    Himachal beauty should not be compromised with development .

  • @vivek3429
    @vivek3429 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Industrialization will ruin himachal's beauty. 118 should sustain as it is.

    • @seemapadhi5016
      @seemapadhi5016 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sir hame plot buy karni hai
      Kiya ye possible hai?
      Agaar hai toh price k bare mi eak video banaye
      Plz

  • @olindavaz2807
    @olindavaz2807 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Hi! I'm from Goa, section 118 shouldn't b removed, never. C our state of Goa all outsiders. I must say whoever has done this is a genius n is really bothered n concerned about his state and people

    • @vishavjeetsingh9586
      @vishavjeetsingh9586 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      🙏🙏

    • @robertfuest007
      @robertfuest007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Goa is a narak, drugs,sex ,veshya vruti ye sab goa he.

    • @ItsMe-vn2gi
      @ItsMe-vn2gi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robertfuest007 so what it's okay

    • @Rohitweasley
      @Rohitweasley 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      in the same spirit, the same laws should then be applicable to every other state as well right ? Let Bangalore be populated with Kannadigas only and not people from other states to preserve it's culture.

  • @ashishsharma-ri5wr
    @ashishsharma-ri5wr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    नवीन भाई मैं नही चाहता कि बाहर से लोग हिमांचल आकर इस खूबसूरत धरती को भी दिल्ली जैसा ही हाल करें। मैं मूलतः खुद हिमांचल का ही हूँ, मेरी पुश्तैनी जमीन का एक बहुत छोटा सा टुकड़ा भी है बिलासपुर में। और मेरा सपना है कि मैं कुल्लू या चंबा में कहीं अपना एक फार्म हाउस बनाऊँ। बाकी रही उद्योगों की बात तो आपको बता दूं कि सोलन कर बद्दी, बरोटीवाला, नालागढ़ में एशिया की सबसे बड़ी मेडिसिन इंडस्ट्री है। सभी लीज़ पर हैं।

  • @bhavnabansal182
    @bhavnabansal182 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Correctly said...section 118 should continue. Beauty of Himachal should remain same. People who wants to live there have other options like take on rent, lease.

    • @bhavnabansal182
      @bhavnabansal182 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @K D it's ohkay...they are himachali they can buy property in Himachal...no other state is (much) better than Himachal, so why would they will go for other states.

    • @exploringnaturalbeauty2102
      @exploringnaturalbeauty2102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@bhavnabansal182 lol 😂 uttrakhand is much beautiful than shithole Himachal , UK is hub of religious pilgrimages and literally called devbhoomi , kangana from Himachal have house in Mumbai why ??

    • @p2egames133
      @p2egames133 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bhavnabansal182 You can find himachali all over Delhi and UP, idk what u r even talking about.

    • @Shivanshigupta.2004
      @Shivanshigupta.2004 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@exploringnaturalbeauty2102 Respect the place and kindly save ur state from pollution rather than spreading hate.

  • @pointofview321
    @pointofview321 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informative video bro nicely explained 👍👍

  • @iryas99
    @iryas99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I am from Meghalaya, wanted to buy property in himachal, but yes section 118 should not be tempered. Let Himachal be paradise... Not concrete jungle

  • @mohitsharma-qh4yc
    @mohitsharma-qh4yc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Section 118 is a landmark itself .see the main problem is that our economy is mainly tourism based and employability is mainly dependent on government sector that's why people of himachal except kullu and shimla and areas where people grow apple other expensive fruits runs towards city's like delhi and mumbai for employment to solve this we should take example of Switzerland how they change their economy tourism based without harming their beauty

  • @NoobsDeveloper
    @NoobsDeveloper 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I support this section should be entact, however, It should also include them not allowing to buy land in other states to make it just. Right now, it appears biased towards Himachal people prosperity. Not allowing them to buy land in other state will give a sense that they want to preserve their environment and culture and in return leaving the their righ of not having land in other state. Conclusion, I support this law, also it should be amended for them leaving rights in other states.

  • @petitamie5821
    @petitamie5821 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Section 118 should be continued, every one should stand against industrialisation in the areas like Uttarakhand, Himachal, Jammu and ladak.

  • @telanganafamilyvlogs
    @telanganafamilyvlogs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Namaskar Sir, Mai Varun Srivastava Telangana se, 118 section ki Himachal Ko bohot zaroorat hai, sirf ek change hona chahiye ki Bahar ke Agriculturist ko bhi Land Purchase karne ki permission deni chahiye, and strictly for only Agriculture use.

    • @justicewithanish
      @justicewithanish 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agriculture in Himachal is largely unprofitable except for Apple

  • @mahendrarawat175
    @mahendrarawat175 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Clearly discovered very good Shivoham ko meri taraf se bahut pyar

  • @usharani6573
    @usharani6573 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Main panjab.se huin per muje himachal se pyaar hai muje himachal bot pasand hai muje to asa he himachal acha lagta hai baher se log anige to sab kuj kharb.ho jaega clean nahhi rahega jaa mahadev 🙏

  • @padankumarswain2951
    @padankumarswain2951 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There should be little relaxation for hotel industries as the state is popular tourist destination. There is in no big star hotels groups . Individuals may not be allowed but hotel industries should be. Otherwise what is difference between JnK & HP?

  • @rajnegi365
    @rajnegi365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    According to IPC/constitution no one can't buy land in himachal pradeah due to special provision.

    • @surajsingh-bq1xc
      @surajsingh-bq1xc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bhai in logo ko hamare state ko barzar samjh rka hai

  • @gauridixit4498
    @gauridixit4498 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bhaiya Uttrakhand mein bhari industrialization ke chalte pichle kuch saalon mein vahan ki vaadiyon mein hone Wala adverse effect hum sab ne dekha hi hai aur aisa hum nahi chahenge ki Himachal mein ho . Aisi koi bhukmari bhi nahi hai Himachal mein jisse industrialaization hi ekmatr Rasta Bache,log bhut creative hai voh kuch na kuch karke apna guzara Kar hi lete Hain

  • @Timeforrevollution
    @Timeforrevollution 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The Natural Ecosystem consisting of the beautiful flora & fauna apart from the culture in Devbhoomi of Himachal & Uttarakhand needs to be protected .Love from Land of Lord Jagganath, Odisha 🙏🏽🕉🇮🇳

  • @thakurdc
    @thakurdc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Section 118 is not only better for himachalis but for non himachalies too.. people from other parts of india will not visit himachal to see concrete jungle if they are allowed to do so... same thing applies to we himachalies also. So save environment, keep sec. 118 intect...

  • @sudhanshudimri5405
    @sudhanshudimri5405 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    We uttarakhandi also want similar law here.

  • @theshubhamthakur6224
    @theshubhamthakur6224 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Section 118 should be forever implemented.

    • @theshubhamthakur6224
      @theshubhamthakur6224 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yesudeep Jealous... Lies in side u.... Poor Person

  • @deeprn8966
    @deeprn8966 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I am from Assam nd I totally support the act and the thought behind it. We can see the catastrophe uttarakhand is experiencing in the bid for development. We must protect and preserve nature

  • @Sandeepkumar-kk9nk
    @Sandeepkumar-kk9nk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ek limit like 1200 sq ft per person sirf rehne ke liye dena chahiye Himachal me.
    Industrialization should not be allowed if the people doesn't want it.

  • @PradeepSharma-ny5yr
    @PradeepSharma-ny5yr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think no any industries which pollute to environment, should be set up in himachal pradesh for saving the beauty and culture of the state. Agriculture sector and tourism sector must be boost for employment of youth. every person goes to hill state for peace and observe the beauty of himalya. No outsider must be allowed in himachal pradesh to use of purchasing land for business purposes. you can say himachal lands is not for business purposes, it is for agriculture whatever we have been seeing since childhood. From outset, i am against the amendment in section 118 and other rules.

  • @rajibdein
    @rajibdein 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I personally am very keen to settle in HP, but I absolutely support section 118. Only because of this rule, hp remains hp today. Thanks for explaining. Industrialisation is for flat geography, not for hilly natural areas. If 118 is removed or modified, HP will loose the tourism industry as well, and the billionaires will buy all the plots and outcast the original Himachallis. Never ever remove 118. Even being an outsider, I am proud of HP because I am an Indian. India has not yet exposed the power of tourism industry like other countries.. People don't have idea how powerful it is and how much revenue it can generate.

  • @ParsishSankhyan
    @ParsishSankhyan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Only reason why himachal is calm and quality of life is there , because of this only...proud to be born here..

  • @pratyoushthakur8145
    @pratyoushthakur8145 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    This is a good law....should never be removed

  • @nikhilraina5022
    @nikhilraina5022 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1. Video actually starts 2:32

  • @amitthakur0707
    @amitthakur0707 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I Love my Himachali culture....❣️❣️❣️

  • @pankajgaur9078
    @pankajgaur9078 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't want industrialisation in HP.
    But I want live in himachal. HP is a heaven.

  • @nikhilsharmans9239
    @nikhilsharmans9239 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Yes, section 118 always rehna chaiye. Varna humare Himachal ko sab milkar Delhi Mumbai bana dengye.

    • @VkyThakurvlogs
      @VkyThakurvlogs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Shi baat

    • @VishalRajput-ji8bc
      @VishalRajput-ji8bc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      jo ki hum nahi chahte hain

    • @akshaylal1508
      @akshaylal1508 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bhai then why himachalies are moving to Delhi and Mumbai
      And first of all what is humare we all are indians.

    • @nikhilsharmans9239
      @nikhilsharmans9239 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@akshaylal1508 brother I am from Delhi by birth but my hometown is Himachal I have some piece of land in himachal. And we are welcome all people who comes from other states but we all are said that we protect himachal from pollution and industry. Other wise anyone can visit himchal anytime

    • @exploringnaturalbeauty2102
      @exploringnaturalbeauty2102 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nikhilsharmans9239 so why are you in Delhi ?? What if Delhi people do the same for outsiders ?

  • @VivekSingh-ig7ho
    @VivekSingh-ig7ho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I agree with you because nature is mother of human not industry .without industry we can survive but but without nature it is not possible .thanks God bless you brother. 🙏 Vksingh

  • @Crochetkraft
    @Crochetkraft 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good act, coz its the best act to preserve the beauty of this land and the identity of this awesome culture in its purest form and off course the tribal culture

  • @harrykhipla
    @harrykhipla 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ofcourse the section should stay, tourism in himachal is growing rapidly these days & its the first right of himachal citizen to utilise their resources other than capitalists of other states! On other hand, only himachalis understands the environment & ecosystem of the terrain & knows how’s to preserve the same! Respect!

  • @sanjeevkrchandel5152
    @sanjeevkrchandel5152 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hi Thakur saab..I agree with you and strongly support article 118. Rest if need to provide jobs to youth than we can work on tourism and agriculture which I think still have enormous scope of growth as compared to factory kind of industries; Govt needs to focus and spend on infrastructure. You guys are great and we will meet soon.

  • @dineshchandraagarwal2892
    @dineshchandraagarwal2892 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sundar,I have seen most of d districts of Himachal, very beautiful.

  • @kiranchauhan7
    @kiranchauhan7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    पैसा ही सबकुछ नहीं होता कुछ जगहें ऐसी होनी चाहिए कि दूसरे राज्य के लोग भी आकर खुलकर सांस ले सके हर जगह फैक्टरी और भीड़ भडाका हो जाएगा तो इन्सान आखिर सकूं ढूंढने कहां जाएगा जय हिमाचल

  • @RajendraAJS
    @RajendraAJS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good information ✨
    For the matter of cultural heritage and nature and it's safety of Himachal.. section 118 should remain forever..

  • @khinnuustaad6465
    @khinnuustaad6465 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This law is only to protect the environment and culture. Other states too can implement these rules. But it takes a lot of courage to do so as Property tax in cities give one heck of money to the government. It is up to the state Government whether their priority is nature or money. Himachal believes in sustainable development

  • @user-unqqpdh
    @user-unqqpdh 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    A sustainable industrialisation of specific areas should be possible so that ppl there get jobs , but this should be done very wisely considering ecology , environment… if you block the road for development and if there not much ways left employment you ppl will be the one changing the law and then their will be whole race to sale the land and get rich…
    So everything has its place , a rationally drafted plan which is also executed wisely can give you employment and also you preserve the heritage…
    And pollution man see the traffic in Shimla , you guys already need to work for some standardisation there , because of only focus on tourism there are so many non viable hotels , houses built on mountains on large scale , so it’s already harmful for ecology…

  • @gopabasak9832
    @gopabasak9832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I am a BENGALI . If you look back 80 years or more the Bengali cultural was very beautiful and rich. Culturally Bengali people were quite developed in India but Bengal is so transformed and multicultural now that Bengali culture and even language is also effected for this reason. Though it is strange that being an Indian state Himachal seems to me a foreign country inside India. Wish Bengal had some kind of act such as 118. But also that does not make India one country.

    • @BackspasmANDniggle
      @BackspasmANDniggle 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      cultural damage mainly due to communist regime since independence

  • @nilimavarma309
    @nilimavarma309 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aap ne sahi kaha,ki Himachal ko pollute nahi karna hai.mai jharkhand se hoo, aur ye feel karti hoo ki paryawaran ko bhi bachana hai.isme bad feelings bilkul nahi honi chahiye.zyada bhir agar ho gayi tou jagah ki beauty and culture kahi ke nahi reh jayegi.aapke yaha loug beshak as tourist jayei,par jagah ko saaf suthra rakhei.Himachal hamesha ki tarah swasth aur sunder rahe,aapko aur aapki wife ko hamara good wishes.

  • @Amanthakur-rf1fg
    @Amanthakur-rf1fg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    118 should stay and even flat buying system should also be demolished + in dome of the areas like shimla cement construction should be banned and mud hose construction shoud be promoted thats what i think 😊

  • @SunilSingh-gq6rr
    @SunilSingh-gq6rr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for information brother..from Uttarakhand

  • @vandananegi3928
    @vandananegi3928 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yes himachal ki kubsurti banaye rhane ke liye 118 hamesha rhna chahiye..rozgar ke liye youth ko industry ki jagh agriculture ko badawa dena chahiye..

    • @vandananegi3928
      @vandananegi3928 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nhee bahar ke logo ko nhee jameen deni chahiye..I m from uttrakhand

  • @arvindpatel1025
    @arvindpatel1025 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think should be allowed to by land, but not allowed to do any factories or polution activity. Also some additional heavy amount as duty to be charged for state income to make sure only genuine person can use the land for house and garden only. Just my thought.

  • @SunnyRana-yu4kr
    @SunnyRana-yu4kr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Section 118 is the soul of Himachal.. Preserve the Himalayas (Nature)👈👈👈👈

  • @kailashbaswal4220
    @kailashbaswal4220 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice opinion .not allowed any industrial

  • @akb1975
    @akb1975 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    These are the reasons why unity in diversity not possible only name sake unity we can say😉

  • @dhananjaykhopade7985
    @dhananjaykhopade7985 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    118 section does not dissolved at any condition. Nature is important and your sanskriti and parampara finish ho jayegi.

  • @shibaprasad4816
    @shibaprasad4816 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The existing land law is a necessity.

  • @pushpapal5145
    @pushpapal5145 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really 118yaha rehna hi chahiye..india mai aise hi koi jagah nahi hai..kitna polution hai metropolitan cities mai..toh kam se kam koi aise jagah toh hai..jaha jakar hum kuch time..piece ful life jee sakte hai...💝💝👍👍👍👍
    Nice video..outsiders ko bilkul bhi allow nahi hona chahiye yaha par..land purchase karna

  • @devadattaindia5989
    @devadattaindia5989 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    118 should stay for another 200 years!

    • @ajayshinz8427
      @ajayshinz8427 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      you forgot one more zero. 2000*

  • @updatehighlights4540
    @updatehighlights4540 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ye act me thoda bs change ho jana chahiye mtlb ki koi ja ke reh le lekin wha factory wagera na lagaye to usmein kya dikkat h

  • @grace22267
    @grace22267 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    118 should stay 100%