Great! Is there a technical difference between _earthquake-resilient_ and _earthquake-resistant_ structures, or is _earthquake-resilient_ used generically?
Ideally structures in earthquake country should be built to earthquake-resistant standards. Unfortunately, many structures predate building codes that require engineering for earthquake shaking. Earthquake resilience includes not only the ability to prepare for and withstand an earthquake, but the ability to rapidly recover from the disruption of infrastructure and adapt to changing conditions.
@@IRISEarthquakeScience, thanks for the explanation. But it still doesn’t answer my question (at least, not clearly): Is there a technical difference between earthquake-resistant and earthquake-resilient (i.e., is _earthquake-resilient_ a new class of building able to withstand earthquake damage)? I ask because I live in a subduction zone, and building codes here have been changing to reflect lessons learned, first from Northridge 94/Kobe 95, but especially Tohoku 3-11, and I'm wondering whether I need to be aware of a new term for a new category of aseismic function. For instance, buildings with seismic dampers might fall into this new category, but base-isolated structures not; or the emphasis in resilience could be on, not so much the structural integrity aspect but, as you wrote above, the ability to function while lifelines are still out and recover post-event.
@@JimInYamaguchi I could be totally wrong, but what I got from their response is that 'people' and a community can be earthquake resilient, but buildings should be built to be earthquake resistant. The change in terms being relative to the 'proper noun' type (in other words. is it people? or a thing?) Again, I could be wrong, but that is what I understood from it.
The starting point for research leading to our regional animations has been the book "Active Faults of the World" by Robert Yeats (Cambridge Press 2014). In addition, we study US Geological Survey and professional journal articles, especially recent publications, for more detail.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 85 | คู่เอก "ยอดเหล็กเพชร vs ผึ้งหลวง"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Qq_19bnnxEo/mqdefault.jpg)
Great explanation in such a short time, thank you!
Excellent!
Great! Is there a technical difference between _earthquake-resilient_ and _earthquake-resistant_ structures, or is _earthquake-resilient_ used generically?
Ideally structures in earthquake country should be built to earthquake-resistant standards. Unfortunately, many structures predate building codes that require engineering for earthquake shaking. Earthquake resilience includes not only the ability to prepare for and withstand an earthquake, but the ability to rapidly recover from the disruption of infrastructure and adapt to changing conditions.
P.S. Chile has done a remarkable job of replacing buildings with earthquake-resistant structures and they are impressively resilient!
@@IRISEarthquakeScience, thanks for the explanation. But it still doesn’t answer my question (at least, not clearly): Is there a technical difference between earthquake-resistant and earthquake-resilient (i.e., is _earthquake-resilient_ a new class of building able to withstand earthquake damage)? I ask because I live in a subduction zone, and building codes here have been changing to reflect lessons learned, first from Northridge 94/Kobe 95, but especially Tohoku 3-11, and I'm wondering whether I need to be aware of a new term for a new category of aseismic function. For instance, buildings with seismic dampers might fall into this new category, but base-isolated structures not; or the emphasis in resilience could be on, not so much the structural integrity aspect but, as you wrote above, the ability to function while lifelines are still out and recover post-event.
@@JimInYamaguchi I could be totally wrong, but what I got from their response is that 'people' and a community can be earthquake resilient, but buildings should be built to be earthquake resistant. The change in terms being relative to the 'proper noun' type (in other words. is it people? or a thing?) Again, I could be wrong, but that is what I understood from it.
Thank you
6:57 I had a grandfather who died in 2021 who was born precisely on the day of this earthquake!
Really nice and exhaustive video. It'd be better if you could add some references or bibliography at the end of the video or in the description.
The starting point for research leading to our regional animations has been the book "Active Faults of the World" by Robert Yeats (Cambridge Press 2014). In addition, we study US Geological Survey and professional journal articles, especially recent publications, for more detail.
Hello 😊
THATS MY DAD!
COOL REALLY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!