Regarding the speed test at the end. The VPS only had 1 core. As far as I am aware, wireguard is multithreaded. That's actually pretty impressive that a single core allowed a gigabit of throughput. I don't think ChaCha20 was hardware offloaded.
Was able to get it 1.2G/bit with a bigger CPU on both sides but that seemed to be the limit. Will do some more testing and report back probably in a future stream.
@@Tailscale I am getting 3.2 gigabits with a 2 core vm. Unfortunetly my host is sharing resources with other VMs. I will need to test on my other box later.
I am trying to use tailscale for quite a few months now but I got way less speed and more latency than ZeroTier on the same (quite a few) systems and between the same locations. It looks like TS is more versatile and have a more "polished" web UI that ZT, but the last one work way better for me in terms of speed and latency
Hi Alex, we want to access Tailnets without an installed Tailnet client (company security restrictions). It would be great if one can log into the Tailscale portal and start an ephemeral HTTP(S) forward-proxy node running in the browser to access web services in the Tailnet without opening the Tailnet for the public.
It might be a dumb request, but I would love to be able to point my domain to a local tailscale ip so it would use that instead of the normal A/AAAA/CNAME record. Not sure how you would do that though. I've considered just having multiple A records, where one of them is the local tailscale ip but idk how that works if you're not on the tailnet in every situation.
And someone else could be pointed to their own tailscane node in that case, I guess. A txt record with something account specific and tailnet ip would be better.
Thanks Alex & Tailscale. More of these please :)
Regarding the speed test at the end. The VPS only had 1 core. As far as I am aware, wireguard is multithreaded. That's actually pretty impressive that a single core allowed a gigabit of throughput. I don't think ChaCha20 was hardware offloaded.
I will test rest assured!!
Second this
Was able to get it 1.2G/bit with a bigger CPU on both sides but that seemed to be the limit. Will do some more testing and report back probably in a future stream.
@@Tailscale I am getting 3.2 gigabits with a 2 core vm. Unfortunetly my host is sharing resources with other VMs. I will need to test on my other box later.
This is good to know. I want to understand better where the bottleneck is and how to show it.
I am trying to use tailscale for quite a few months now but I got way less speed and more latency than ZeroTier on the same (quite a few) systems and between the same locations. It looks like TS is more versatile and have a more "polished" web UI that ZT, but the last one work way better for me in terms of speed and latency
Hi Alex, we want to access Tailnets without an installed Tailnet client (company security restrictions). It would be great if one can log into the Tailscale portal and start an ephemeral HTTP(S) forward-proxy node running in the browser to access web services in the Tailnet without opening the Tailnet for the public.
Oh i seeeeee… so kinda like a VDI solution?
Great job! I hope you will demo Searxng and Tailscale in a future video or live, I was so intrigued.
It might be a dumb request, but I would love to be able to point my domain to a local tailscale ip so it would use that instead of the normal A/AAAA/CNAME record. Not sure how you would do that though. I've considered just having multiple A records, where one of them is the local tailscale ip but idk how that works if you're not on the tailnet in every situation.
And someone else could be pointed to their own tailscane node in that case, I guess. A txt record with something account specific and tailnet ip would be better.