Evidence-Based Medicine "Dr Khaled Emara"
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ค. 2013
- Starting Your Research Journey | SRP Preparatory Course 2013
January 31, 2013 - " Evidence Based Medicine " | Part 2
Speaker is Dr.khaled Emara
- Professor of Orthopedics and Traumatology (Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University)
- Director of the Orthopedic Surgery, Trauma & Limb Reconstruction Unites.
Contact Us
Student Research Unit .6th floor,Faculty of Medicine ,Menoufia University
Email : mfm.srp@gmail.com
Facebook Page : SRP.MFM
08:37 Three Interacting Realms of EBM
09:52 How to practise EBM
12:22 PICO
33:42 Evidence degree according to type of study
39:49 Type of Evidence
Thank you ❤️
باقي محاضرات evidence based medicine وين
جزيتم خيرا ع المحتوي
طب فين ألاقي بتاع الإحصاء ده أو بتوع المعامل و هل هم أي حد ولا لازم يكون فيه نقاط معينة حولهم
❤❤❤❤❤❤
Nice
Thanks
i need the data show ,please
Society is based on progress such as:
Evidence-based constructions buildings - machinesThis exists because
every part of the construction is known down to the detail, composition,
size and objective.
This allows a scientific certificate of the degree of quality to be
delivered.
Evidence-based medicine of the human body with 100% living cells that
can grow, multiply and die, but nobody knows exactly how that happens.
Consequently, delivering a scientific certificate with the grade of
quality does not exist, because:
- one does not know the composition of 1
living cell, let alone that medicine will determine how to repair the
cells
.- the totality of the number of cells is unknown.
- one does not
know the functions of the cells that make the body function optimally.-
one does not know the totality of functions in the body.
- the name, proteins, vitamins, ... and their composition are a vision, but nobody
can determine the exact composition of the atoms and physical properties
exactly.
The same for neurons, genes ... are a name for something that is not
known exactly.
Conclusion: therefore there is no evidence-based medicine if the basic
elements cannot be precisely described. The result: the human body is
not a well-known medium for internal processing without causing damage.
But the problem is much worse:- the scientists, doctors and politicians
have laws approved whereby dead cells = chemicals come into contact with
a medium of 100% living cells: the human body.
The result: dead cells (chemicals) do not have a medicinal effect, but
poison and a number of side effects have arisen.
The law encourages the use of poison, this is not possible because a law
cannot be used to harm people. The same reasoning applies to animals
and nature that also consist of 100% living cells. The scientists are
responsible for their absurd conclusions and actions.
what r u trying to say
@@ayaessam3672 If you do not understand my statement then you are not a scientist.