Simon Nielsen vs. Kazune Kosaka | Semifinal | Magic World Championship XXIX

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ย. 2023
  • Simon Nielsen (Azorius Soldiers) vs. Kazune Kosaka (Esper Midrange)
    1:15 Simon Nielsen vs. Kazune Kosaka Game 1
    17:47 Simon Nielsen vs. Kazune Kosaka Game 2
    34:18 Simon Nielsen vs. Kazune Kosaka Game 3
    Find full coverage, decklists, and more from Magic World Championship XXIX here: magic.gg/events/magic-world-c... #mtg #MagicTheGathering #MTGWorlds
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @user-fp7mg1fl1n
    @user-fp7mg1fl1n 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    G1 when simon scooped he could’ve activated Officer to dig for Harbin he had 7 mana available. 4 for the officer activation, 2-3 leftover to play Harbin and win the game. Scooped early at worlds 😅

  • @dakotabryson1914
    @dakotabryson1914 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wish standard was as big as if was during Khans of tarkir standard

  • @simonetozzi7912
    @simonetozzi7912 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congrats to Kazune! I just don't understand why he avoided to put counters on Dennick in game 3. Anyone?

    • @DoubleJack777
      @DoubleJack777 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      He wanted to prevent the lord from dying. If Dennick died then he could at least bring it back from graveyard with flying and extra interactions

  • @DuskSlayerYT
    @DuskSlayerYT 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Only saw protect negotiators come out of simons sideboard here

  • @DoubleJack777
    @DoubleJack777 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    That "misplay" from Simon shuffling those cards 😂😂 and then stating that it was the first time activating it when it's known that Pro players play with these decks thousands of times

  • @migsho
    @migsho 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It's Kosaka. Please fix the title.

    • @Play_MTG
      @Play_MTG  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Thanks for pointing this out! It's been fixed.

    • @bradyvilhauer4445
      @bradyvilhauer4445 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      While correct, probably one of the more frustrating comments. There are kinder ways to say this

  • @francescodesarlo5780
    @francescodesarlo5780 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Holy moly that 3-0 was domineering

    • @r3drumg33k3
      @r3drumg33k3 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Is it like a thing in MTG videos the first comment MUST be the biggest spoiler it can be?

    • @prmperop
      @prmperop 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@r3drumg33k3 lmao it always is!! dont ever read them

    • @francescodesarlo5780
      @francescodesarlo5780 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@r3drumg33k3 If did go to the comment section, you alredy passed by the description where there were only 3 timed spot, so, unless you are missing something you already knew it was a 3-0. But I get not everyone can logically connect.

    • @SI29222
      @SI29222 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@francescodesarlo5780try to not be an asshole in the future

    • @djWOOF
      @djWOOF 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@francescodesarlo5780 on a PC you only need to scroll a tiny bit to get to comments - but to see the description you have to actively open it up

  • @skylar5257
    @skylar5257 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Marshall acting like Simon didn’t dominate the quarters because of his opponents land floods and mana screws is funny. They talk about his deck like the thing showed promise when in fact it literally only ran through the quarters because of the worst luck imaginable lol.