Brother Mangera i started to follow you few months ago, i am revert from Finland 21 years ago...seaking knowlege and i love your style to tell clearly things that i understand Islam better...you are a pearl to give knowledge Alhamdulillah
Alhamdulillah sister. We are fortunate to have one of the best and proper scholar in this time. My advice would be to stick to his lectures and guidance.
I am just in love how Dr mufti Abdur Rahman sahab damad barkatuhum settled the issue with intellect peace and love ❣️ jazakallah for bringing such a peaceful lecture to us
Took him 17years to realise that "Salafi's" laymen do not take directly from Quran & Sunnah directly without using Scholars. Issue remains there is no obligation to stick to any mathab. It is different to for a learned person who actually understand the usool of the mathab and follows that usool. However there is no proof for a laymen to adopt any mathab exclusively. Laymen asks someone of knowledge he trusts. Does not matter if he is Hanbali Shafi Hanafi or maliki or thahiri. Sadly I find this type of basic misinformation by someone who seems to be familiar with salafis for over 2 decades to be so clueless. Grins and ridicules. I don't think this man is someone I would take seriously.
This video is a lie and sitting up hate. I've been Salafi for almost 30 years and we have never been taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught (from imam Abu hanifa, imam Malik, imam Ahmed, and imam Shafi's words), that we must not be fanatical about the scholar / imam we learn from.
@headfones1000 Exactly. It is funny (actually sad) that those who know nothing about Salafiyyah get on podiums and give hours long speeches misguiding people or spreading lies. One can catch him right away when he started asking people about naming 5 scholars, blah blah. And what about other Madahib as there were more than 4? Zahiri, etc. Was Imam Abu Hanifa a Hanafi? Was Imam Malik a Maliki? Was Imam Shafi a Shafii? Was Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal a Hanbali? No. They were all Salafis. Alhamdulillah
@@salikidrees2968 how? You guys are a misguided sect, you associate body parts with Allah, and commit lots of problems within the ummah. You guys are cursed
I’m a Salafi and have wasted 25 years with them. I now have to relearn everything from the detail matters all over. I’m researching and asking Allah to guide me more and more. You Shaikh have clarified so many matters to me now. So too Abu Aaliyah. May Allah bless you and your family all in this life and the next. I believe it’s never too late. I hope I can re-learn properly now.
Alhamdulilah brother I was young when I started with them but it only lasted a few years. I saw through their character and hypocrisy. I caught them many times lying about "ijmaa" and thats when I knew they have a gang mentality.
ma sha Allah. your fiqh al-imam book brought me so much clarity. i used to be salafi - as a revert myself and i’ve noticed too that for born muslims who decide to begin practicing - especially if their families aren’t, they tend to follow salafiyyah. i think this is… for both parties due to ignorance and also the accessibility of resources from salafi funded projects. but alhamdullilah, you help me with my islam. such a beautiful book that is concise yet it provides the necessary detail when needed
My dear brother, I'm still in shock how I wrote on the cover of my copy in black permanent marker many years ago that this book needs refuting LOLLLLLLLL I thank Allah for having opened my eyes
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble Muhammad the Brit? Asalamu alaikum, im Ayyub the Brit haha😅 and trust me bro. a dear brother recommended me the book and i remember opening it looking for faults but subhan’Allah it had none!
@@zatheonladdie5715 lolllll I would go all in with the Hanafi Madhab but I've got used to the Hanbali Madhab a lot. Otherwise if I could turn back the clock I'd stick with it, very strong and solid, the Big voluminous works of the Hanafis take you into a different world, the early Madhabs never relied only on Hadeeth alone, never, they also used the Fiqh and Fatawas of the sahaaba and tabi'een and Maraseel Hadeeth and so much more. I'm going to keep adding comments for extra points as I can see fanatics here.
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble Over simplification of complex issues! The hanafi fiqh has some core fallacies/disagreement with the Muhaddiseen (including maalik, Shafiee and Ahmad), such as the Ahnaaf reject the zyadti of Hadith over the hukm of Qur'aan (a pass for hadith rejectors), the Ahnaaf consider istihsaan as a valid legal proof, they also are not in favour of hadees being a proof in itself rather it has to comply with the core principles which their fuqaha have agreed upon! Else the hadeeth is explained away or considered as abrogated! (Another pass for hadeeth rejectors) This is the reason why the muhaqiqeen among the hanafees such as Ibne Hummam, Imam zailai, shah Waliullah dehlavi and Abdul hayy lakhnavi have rejected these principles of Ahnaaf and have declared Imam Abu Haneefa free of these fabricated usool! Ref: Hujjatullahil baaligha of Shah Waliullah dehlavi Rahimahullah. As for the mutaqadimeen of the hanafee mazhab they all were ahlul hadith, the foremost among them being Qazi Abu Yousuf Rahimahullah.
I think many of us have had exposure to Salafi dawah. Alhamdulillah even for that, because there was a long time when that was the only way to learn our Salah, etc. Our mistakes made us learn to ask questions and take corrections, alhamdulillah. I find that many Muslims who were handed the deen and didn't have a struggle arriving at the correct way are willing to throw it away instantly for the next alphabet agenda or remove hijab, or excuse riba, etc. Alhamdulillah for our struggles to understand madhahib and work on ourselves.
@just_akh4694 I'm not sure about the new generation, but in our time, there was a lot of accusations of kufr and nifaq of people "not in the salafi da'wah and the ideas that only the Salafi dawah is on the saved sect and anyone following a madhhab would be in hell. Many self appointed imams that never even studied under a proper chain.
Sheikh, go to the valley of Hadramawt, Yemen. That’s the practical of the sunnah. I believe that’s the last remaining place on earth practicing all the Sunnah. It is also the specific place Sayiddina Abu Bakr As-Siddique made 3 specific duas for the inhabitants and its land. A truly hidden gem. It is known as the “land of the auliya.”
Whoever titles these videos knows how to get us to stand on our tippie toes, maa shaa Allah. I am on the edge of my seat waiting for this one to drop إن شاء الله.
Alhmdl now I understand that the 4 Fiqh Madhabs are just systems and frameworks to study Fiqh and produce Fatwas with extreme amounts of research gone into producing their foundations and then were refined by mountains of top scholars that the Ummah has never seen since centuries. It’s impossible rather foolish to even try in some sort of way to re-invent the wheel. I remember Shaikh I bought your Book about the proofs and the angles for the Prayer before many years and I wrote on it with a permanent black on the front “This book needs refuting and should only be read by students of knowledge”!!! All I did 4 months ago is I turned to Allah SWT and said maybe I’m wrong. I’m sure actually I’m wrong because can the Salafis, especially the Madkhali which I was close to, how can they be Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah when they don’t do any Jama’ah as they keep splitting up more and more amongst themselves not to forget they split the Ahle Hadeeth Masjids up in the UK wherever they are. Plus they warn from even praying in other masjids of traditional Sunni Muslims. So I asked Allah to guide me along the way and after plenty of careful research it became very clear I’ve been misguided and been misguiding others in the issues of Aqeedah and Fiqh and Purification of the Soul. Issues of Bid’ah were turned into Major Kufr and Major Shirk. Where Imam ibn Taymiyyah went against the Salaf we have been following him and promoted that. Where Imam Muhammad ibn Wahhab had major errors we followed and promoted it and we made judgements based upon all of this and much more. We mocked and boycotted. We misquoted. We even had many major contractions. We believed we were the Saved sect so look down on others and thought we were the most blessed and so never gave even 5% of what is needed to practice the Pillar of Ih’saan termed as Tazkiyyatu Nafs/Purification of the Soul. Why as we thought us being from the saved sect will save us. We would judge by clothing and appearance too. If you got a turban or Salwar Kameez or say Hazrat so and so or such and such book Shareef then we would say he’s dodgy at best. I’m researching and going to summarise this all with a list of sources for more details soon to give out to the more sincere open minded Salafis. We need to make a lot of Dua for our Salafi brothers and sisters. I don’t think any of the heads of this group will repent as they will lose everything as in reality their Eemaan is weak because they lack in purification of the Soul. They don’t look after their heart. So they will hold onto their followings and positions. The pleasure of Allah is last. They are used to the status. They will fight against us to maintain their status. They don’t want to look foolish. To be found out they have been misguided and misguiding many others. They know they’ll have re-learn a lot. The salafis don’t even learn or teach simple Fiqh properly. It’s all upside down. I’m re/learning how. I wasted 25 years. I hope to save many others to not waste many years of their life too. Make plenty of Dua for me. I have now a mountain to climb. It took me a lot of courage to admit I was wrong and accept the haqq. Just to research with an open heart was hard enough. But it’s like Allah made it easy to understand. Jzkl
Lol you gotta learn how to add spaces in between the paragraphs in your thesis 😅. Was going to read it, then hit "read more" and saw how messy it looked. Oh well, im happy for you... or, im sorry for your loss 🙃
So you decided on the whole manhaj of salaf based on the mistakes of a bunch of overzealous individuals?? Great😄 So which hanafi you are gonna follow now?? Deobandi? Barelwi? Deobandi hayaati? Deobandi mamaati? Also their tableegh jamaath split into two.. Markaz vs shoora... Their own deobandi scholars have issued fatwas against them... So you see pretty lot of unity among deobandis?? 😊 So sad you decided not to follow those scholars whose pious forefathers eliminated shirk(to a very large extent) from the pious lands of hijaz and stopped the biddath of four different musallas around the kaaba... And decided to follow those who euologise concepts like wahdatul wujood... So imam taymiyyah was wrong? Well then what about those imams who invented concepts like wahdatul wujood which has blatant shirk in it?? Whom deobandis praise to no end... Wallahi, Allah guides those whom he wills. Mistakes of imam taymiyyah in what? You read his books or are you parroting what his opponents alleged about him? No one is infallible apart from beloved prophet SAW thou... U need honesty man not decision based on whims and desires.
I think we have made fiqh dry of taqwa. One thing ALL of us, whether scholars or normies, have to make sure to remember and consider always, is that at the end of it all, ALLAH is the one who will judge whether we have most sincerely chosen an fiqh opinion or we have chosen, instead, based on our desires. We have to fear ALLAH when choosing the best path to ALLAH and even more so when we judge others on their fiqhi choices and opinions. Let's all come back to taqwa of ALLAH. 1:04:35 Well said!
Absolutely spot on. This is why I always laugh and reply to them, "we all follow Quran and Sunnah... the 4 imams followed and studied the Quran and the Sunnah." I guess for some, they prefer placing a monopoly and an ownership of the Quran/Sunnah. "Us vs them" dynamics, a boatload of group-think, and a bigger boat-load of jahils.
@@thewariscomingtoatownneary7572 I’m not saying this guy is as I do not have the knowledge to give fatwa on individuals. However I have seen Pakistanis in big groups go to shrines and do sujood infront of graves in Lahore.
I listened to this and I have a few things to say: 1. Most of the 'Salafi Fiqh' is based upon the Madhab of Imam Ahmad. And even Shaikh Muhammadi Ibn Abdul Wahhab was Hanbali. However, modern Hanbali scholars like Shaikh Bin Baaz, Uthaimeen, Sa'di, Fawzaan etc go against the Mu'tamad of the Madhab at times and many of the Salafis go back to them to seek Fatwa. 2. A person would teach the Madhab what he learnt. Hence, if there are several students who were in Riyadh, Madeenah and Makkah it is obvious that they would teach Hanbali books. Likewise, many of the scholars like Shaikh Mutlaq Al Jaasir and Shaikh Ahmad Quaimi and Shaikh Aamir Bhajat who offer online programs teach Hanbali Fiqh. So to muscle people into teaching or learning a system they don't know is entirely ridiculous. 3. In terms of Madhahib I believe that those who graduated from Darul Ulooms in the subcontinent NEED to be more tolerant. If one travels to Azhar Masjid all the Madhahib co-exist and that is because the teachers there have knowledge and understanding regarding Fiqh, its nuances and complexities. 4. The main issue is Aqeedah. Abu Haneefah, Shafiee, Malik, Ahmad, Bukhari, Muslim etc. were all upon one Aqeedah. They were neither Maaturidi or Ashari.
They were all on the Aqeeda of Ahl Sunnah which was the Aqeeda detailed and formulated by Imam Ash'ari. Imam Ash'ari lived later than them. But his and Imam Maturidi's explanation of Creed is that of Ahl Sunnah. These two contemporary Imams formulated the theology just like the four previous Imams formulated the 4 Fiqhi Madhabib.
There is no such thing as Wahhabi Aqeedah. Secondly, the books of the Salaf especially that of Imam Al Laalakaaee where he documented the creed of Imam Al Bukhari, Ali Ibn Madeeni, Sufyaan Ath Thawri, Abu Haatim At Raazi clearly documents the 'Aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah. And it does not entail philosophy or Kalaam. I recommend that you read those books in sha Allah.
@@drmauroof I'm not convinced imposing a theology or 'aqeeda' by Imam Ashari is in the best interests of Muslims today. You only have to read the 'Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology' to see how confusing and conflicting the ideas prevelant were in those academic circles over 1000 years ago. As a simple example, is the Qur'aan eternal or created ? Just how does Imam Ibn Hanbli's position become 'correct'? There is no nass to believe in either sides arguemant. No Muslim will be asked about this on the Day of Judgement.
@@MusaMills1 No matter what spin you put on it using names of the actual Salaf that you have no chain/connection to through scholarly transmission isn’t going to help you. Let’s call a spade a spade, yes wahhabi aqeedah
@58:21 The book mentioned is 'Durra al-Bahiyya' - This is also available in English titled 'Comprehensive-Islamic-Jurisprudence-Sh.-Muhammad-ash-Shawkani-(around 815+ pages); published in Malaysia ...available also in UK through Darus Salaam Books, London Central Mosque). I can provide the soft copies if anyone is interested...
The great scholars of haheeth never never ever made chapter headings to make their books into books of Fiqh. It was clearly only to make it easy to organise the many hadeeth. Imam Abu Zur’ah at-Raazi said I sat with Ahmed ibn Hanbal and would mention to him a chapter then he would start mentioning all the narrations with their chains for that chapter. The books of Fiqh were set up to put all the thousands of Fiqh issues into organised chapters. Their sentences summarised all the proofs such as verses and many hadeeth and narrations of the Sahaaba and Taabieen and so on.
Subhanallah this was such a great lecture. I have encountered a lot of the Salafi - non madhabis in the last decade and this is the best discourse I have listened to yet. Mat Allah reward you all.
Alhamdulilah Shaykh, thank you so much for this lecture. They say "lets follow quran and sunnah" so are they saying the 4 Imams didnt follow the sunnah? The pseudo-salafis speak in double talk and hide whats inside their chests.
Nobody who is a salafi says this. What the salafis say is that the those from hindu lands such as the pakistanis and indians, and those from the christian lands, such as the bosnians,albanians, and turks, those from the levant and egypt have chosen to align their deen to be closer to hindusim and christianity with the constant grave worship, amulet worship, birthday worship, major and minor shirk, and so on, that is far away from the 4 imams and Islam. That is what the salafis criticize. We do not care if you choose not to perform raf al yadayn or something like that.
Most of the strong hadiths were only compiled after the 4 imams came into existence. One can follow Quran and sunnah blindly but one cannot follow imams blindly. If the imams verdict contradicts the Quran or the Hadith you cannot follow the imam. That is like shirk . According to Hanafi madhab one is not allowed to eat prawns but there’s nowhere in the Quran or any reliable hadith where prawns are forbidden to eat. So are you gonna follow hanafi or quran?
@@sbslm1They definitely didn't follow shaykh ibn taymiyyahs, albani, bin baz and uthaymeens Madhab. That's a stupid questions. As the imams were after that time That's like me saying did the khulafa follow hadith or shahih Al Bukhari. The four imams followed the understanding of different shahaba and the shahaba followed the Qur'an and sunnah.
@@4ozking858you forgot to mention the Arab lands where the salafis do shirk by blind following their skaykhs which is also shirk. They choice shahi albukhari over hadith and sunnah. They look past their shaykhs mistakes which are against the hadith or sunnah which is also shirk. They are following there shaykh over Allah. Such as letting American troops have a base in Saudi Arabia when it is clear in the hadith no non Muslims can be in the Arabian peninsula. It is not permissible for any of them (the kuffaar) to live in the Hijaaz. This is the view of Maalik and al-Shaafa’i, but Maalik said: I think that they should be expelled from all the Arab lands, because the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Two religions cannot coexist in the Arabian Peninsula.” Abu Dawood narrated with his isnaad from ‘Umar that he heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “I will certainly expel the Jews and the Christians from the Arabian Peninsula,, and I will not leave anyone there but Muslims.” Al-Tirmidhi said: this is a saheeh hasan hadeeth. And it was narrated that Ibn ‘Abbaas said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) left behind three instructions. He said: Expel the mushrikeen from the Arabian Peninsula, honour the delegations the way that I do, and he kept quiet about the third. Narrated by Abu Dawood. Al-Mughni, 9/285, 286.
@@imtiazlatif4948I don't know where you have learnt your knowledge from but your information is incorrect. Strong hadith were written at the time of the shahaba and not after the times of the four imams. Also the hanafi opinion is different from that of imam Abu hanifa. The imam believed prawns were not fish and his students believed they were fish. Translation: A fish is that creature which has a backbone, lives in water, swims with its fins and breathes through its gills. Prawns do not come under the category of fish, because they do not have a backbone nor do they breathe through gills. So they fall under the category of insects, and would not be allowed. Eating Insects: It is not permissible in the Shafi’i school to eat insects (such as ants, bees, flies, beetles, roaches, worms). This is because insects are considered distasteful, and permissibility has been tied to what is good, and impermissibility to what is distasteful. This is derived from the Qur’an (7:157), in describing the Messenger “who makes good things permissible for them and bad things impermissible.” I would love to write more to disprove your baseless claims. You can research the false claims you have yourself as the correct information is there.
Salafi dawah is big on the internet which is why people who don't have first hand access to religious people, keep getting knowledge from sources that have dwindled from the tradition, salafism has caused a lot of damage, Nevertheless Alhamdulillah, Allah swt is Al Hadi, whomsoever he guides none can lead astray and whomsoever he leads astray none can guide
When a Scholar A speaks on an issue give evidence...and Scholar B speaks on the same issue but does not give evidence, who do we follow? For the one who can read, listen, understand, has intelligent the follows Scholar A.
Rightly said, but even the educated Hanafi jurists /mufties are blind followers. The renowned Pakistani Mufti Taqi Usmani says in ‘Taqleed Ki Share’e Haisiyyat’: For a muqallid, his imam’s fatwa is sufficient. He has no need of looking into Quraan and Sunnah for daleel (evidence). Having said that, if there occurs an issue whereby the muqallid finds a hadith which goes against the ruling and opinion of his imam, its necessary for him to have faith that he has not understood the hadith. If he leaves the ruling of his imam and takes the hadith of the messenger then he will go astray. Taqleed Ki Sharee Haisiyat . Urdu copy page 87- Mufti Taqi Usmani They still follow the guidelines which were laid down about 1100 years ago. '' usooli hanafi scholar Karkhee '' “The ayah of the Quraan that opposes the statement of our ashaab (ie the Hanafee scholars) should be considered to be figuratively explained or it should be understood to be abrogated. Similarly any ahadeeth that contradicts and opposes the statement of our ashaab it will also be figuratively explained or understood to be abrogated.” (ar-Risaalah Fee Usool al-Hanafiyyah pg.169-170 and also commonly known as Usool Karkhee).
IBN MASOOD RA STATED IN HIS TIME"" TODAY WE LIVE IN A TIME WHEN THE SCHOLARS ARE MORE AND SPEAKERS ARE LESS, THERE WILL COME A TIME WHEN SCHOLARS ARE LESS AND SPEAKERS ARE MORE"' SO BEWARE MY DEAR BROTHERS.
Mufti Sahib thought process behind his words is what i enjoy the most and then his explanation of details. It’s important as a viewer to understand the thought process behind these lectures rather than jump on this whole bidah and haram diagnoses.
Mufti Sahab is wrong and even spreading lies. Since when anyone from the Sahaba, Tabiyeen and Atba Tabiyeen used aqal before Deen? This "thought process" (philosophy) or using rationale before authentic Ahadith is what none of the earliest generations did. Ali Radiallahu Anhu even spoke against it in an authentic Hadith when he talked about how Islam does not always go by logic as he saw Prophet Muhammad sal Allahu Alihi Wa Salam.... Abd Khayr reported: Ali ibn Abi Talib, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “If the religion were based upon one’s opinion, one might expect the bottom of the leather sock to be wiped instead of the top. I have seen the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, wiping over the upper part of his leather socks.” Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 162 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
@@salikidrees2968He never ever mentioned using philosophy over the Sahih Ahadith. I can bet you did not watch the whole video. What He is saying is that even the Salaf differed in various. Yani even the Salaf had ikhtilaf on some issues. Who are we to believe that just “following the Quran and Sunnah” is enough? Even the modern day don’t just use Quran and Sunnah, they use the views and interpretation of Al-Albani and Ibn Uthaymeen and Bin Baz. So once again, even the Salaf had ikhtilaf because the Prophet (pbuh) accepted these differences. And Hadith are not on the level of the Quran. According to Hanafi fiqh for example, we use Quran, Sunnah, Ijma, Qiyas (logic and aql), Istihsan (personal opinion) and Customs (‘urf). If there is no answer in the Quran and Sunnah, using Logic and Aql becomes necessary.
@@salikidrees2968 Albani was hanafi and so was father RA but he strayed away from it. As Mutf sb said, if you wanna follow S Albani then feel free to do so.
@raystar800 father who? Again did Sheykh Albani Raheema hu Allah prayed according to Imam Abu Hanifa or did he pray according to Rasool Allah ﷺ? Are Muslims to follow Prophet Muhammad ﷺ "blindly" or someone else? Sheykh Albani wrote a book on Prayer with references from authentic Ahadith. Alhamdulillah. Do you pray like Mufti or do you pray the way Prophet Muhammad ﷺ prayed and told us?
Wa tu izzo man tashaa wa tuzzillu man tashaa! May Allah guide the Shias, pseudo salafis and ahlul bidaah to the siraate mustaqeem of the Ahle sunnah waljamaah! Ameen.
@@dhiaulhaq5958 may Allah guide the deobandis, especially the ones who think of donkeys in salah and the ones who think Allah has the possibility to lie. Ameen
@@AhleSunnah586 The curse of Allah be upon the liars. May Allah open the doors of hidayah to the ahlul bidaah who openly SEEK madad from ghairullah although in salah they recite IYYAKA NAABODU WA IYYAKA NASTAEEN!
Brothers of ZamZamAcademy I wanted to request if you've got Turkish translation to the similar topic lecture as this is a Strong movement that we've seen targeting our Turkish brothers who unfortunately don't have a similar answers or defense to the questions...
@@taimur526 there are already the ones that speak on such topics. The actual problem is that people nowadays in Turkey have A LOT OF Kibr(arrogance) They don't want to listen to any Hoca (teacher/scholar) They see them as backwards. Some even reject hadith and Quranist. Some say Allah gave me brain, I read and understand Quran, some mixing things with science. A lot of crazy things going on, so due to such arrogance, they don't listen and hate such scholars. Turkey is messed up BIG time unfortunately. May Allah guide us all
Spoke to a salafi brother just yesterday and he said he does not follow a madhab at all. I simply said to him, either you are qualified to derive rulings yourself and effectively make your own madhab or you go to someone to ask questions and therefore you are following their madhab.
@@rahilhabib He may have meant that he does not follow any of the 4 major madhabs. His rulings will still need to be derived from scholars who are qualified to give rulings. Salafia is wholly misrepresented. All of Sunni Islam is upon Salafia, if one sect is not then it cannot be Sunni Islam. later additions from later scholars are just that, additions. We leave it to the scholars of Ah lul Sunnah to determine whether they are beneficial or not but the Islam we follow today is the Islam that is derived from the first 3 generations and the prophet (saw) with evidences.
@@azizurrahman116 my point is that when you ask a scholar for a ruling (because we laymen aren't qualified to derive rulings ourselves) we rely on them for the ruling and trust in them for that. That is the same thing 'blind following'. The difference is that the salafi madhab is a contemporary madhab while the 4 mainstream madhab have gone through over 1,000 years of scholarship.
سبحان الله Another good example of why we shouldn't just see "Dr" or "mufti" in the titles and follow the person. May Allah guide everyone who is sincere. آمين
@58:21 The book mentioned is 'Durra al-Bahiyya' - This is translated in Urdu with the title ' Fiqh al-Hadith' in two volumes (around 1570+ pages); published in Pakistan by Nomani Kutubkhana...I can provide the soft copies if anyone is interested...It is the time to unite now...
Yes.. Time to unite the way likes of Imam shawkani Rahimahullah called upon... He was a fierce oppnent of taqleed... Also wrote a beautiful treatise on it.. I forget the name
Another big Problem we Salafis have is that we prefer and push the judgements on many Hadeeth of Shaikh al-Albaani above the classical Hadeeth scholars like Imam Hafiz ibn Hajr al-Asqalaani, Zayla'ee, Qatloobah, al-Iraaqi, ibn Abdul-Barr, al-Bayhaqi, Imam an-Nawawi, ........ so if these scholars say Saheeh or Hasan we prefer Shaikh al-Albaani who might say Daeef instead, common practice this. Not to forget they were Huffaaz with the chains of many hadeeth books, hence they were termed as Haafiz. Shaikh al-Albaani was a researcher on Hadeeth, not a great Haafiz like we had before, they combined their massive Hifz and research together. We Salafis even differ on many issues of Bidah like using the Tasbeeh beads, Fowzaan and Uthaimeen say's its ok, al-Albaani and ibn Baaz say it's Bidah.
Please show me where it says Shaykh Al-Fawzaan and Shaykh Uthaymeen differed with others on using tasbeeh? The classical scholars you name dropped we teach their books more fervently in our universities and madrasah, maybe when you go umrah or hajj sit in the duroos at masjid an nabawi and masjid Al haram and benefit from them. They are far more learned in the books of these scholars than a senior deobandi scholar like taqi usmani. The only scholars your people quote are the khandalvis, palanpuris and the odd classical scholar here and there, the names that are popular in your circles are ibn arabi and Al-ghazali 😂 I wonder why….
Brother... More you shoot blanks more it looks like you have an agenda🤣 Don't stop with imam bayhaqi... Go much into past.. Imam daarqutnee.. Imam Bukhari.. Imam daarmi... Imam ahmad.. Well... You will be surprised to learn that how badly these imams criticised blind following and especially ahnaf for rejecting ahaadees.... You are not sincere
You have no idea... Looks like you are just dropping names... We salafis don't follow imam albani blindly.. And the idea you are trying to push through saying that imam albani came with something new than these imams is your ignorance. You mentioned IMAM ABDL BARR.. He was a salafi in aqeeda.. A maliki by learning but not a blind follower. Have u read his work? He has refuted blind following of madhabs very much...sheikh Albani just walked the way of these pious imams..thats all...as for difference in furoo issues see how badly deobandis differ among themselves..they can't even unite on a simple issue like EATING PRAWNS BEING ALLOWED OR PROHIBITED..According to some of them hanafis are not allowed to eat it but they can trade in it as it is halal for shafis🤣.thats the kind of blind following salafi manhaj opposes...as for few furoo issues, different opinions are no problem until there is proof both ways..Please don't push your ignorance and biased views on others... Fear Allah
10:45 - Imam Nawawi, Imam Tahawi, Fakhar ad Din Razi, Ibn Rajab Hanbali, Ibn Hajar Asqalani, Imam Dhahabi, Ibn Kathir, ibn Al Jawzi, Imam Suyuti, ibn Jarir at Tabari etc.
I don’t know any salafi brother read a hadith or verse and interpret it himself. When it comes to fiqh and understanding of fiqh and how to apply it in our daily lives, we all follow certain scholars. This is a misrepresentation of salafiya to claim that the salafis without adequate knowledge just interpret religious texts on themselves.
SubhanAllah Amazing lecture, I was a salafi and it took months of slowly breaking away from it which happened very recently, and many of them are so staunch that just a few days age, lay followers who just began studying- passing idiotic fatwas like it is nothing, one of them said that an athari women cannot marry from a athari or mattaduri.
السَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ ٱللَّهِ وَبَرَكاتُهُ •Brothers and sisters this brothers spoke in a respectful manner linguistically but in reality they were misleading the way how they presented Salafiyah. •The Salafi scholars are not against following a Madhhab but they are against blindly and fanatically following a Madhhab even after the truth has became clear to you. •The end goal of the muslim should be to come to the sunnah not to come to the Madhhab. The madhhab is only a tool we can use to come to the truth. •Practically the Salafi scholars say that for a layman is permissible to follow a Madhhab but not obligatory, following a Madhhab is the best way to learn in the beginning the rulings of fiqh, but we should not be fanatical about the Madhhab and stick to it even after we see that the truth is somewhere else. •Salafi scholars did a hard work to unite the Muslims in the correct Aqeedah and to come back to Tawheed. This brothers spoke all the time about fiqh issues as if that is the only thing that salafi scholars have called Muslims to come back to quran and sunnah. The most important thing is to come back to correct Aqeedah which they didn’t even mention one time. •There is so many mistakes and flaws they mention that is to long to list them here but everyone should try and check for them self the points they mention and see if everything is how they presented it. . •The madhhab of Abu Hanifah (may Allah have mercy on him) is the most widespread madhhab among the Muslims, and perhaps one of the reasons for that is that the Ottoman caliphs followed this madhhab and they ruled the Muslim lands for more than six centuries. That does not mean that the madhhab of Abu Hanifah is the most sound madhhab or that every ijtihad in it is correct, rather like other madhhabs, it contains some things that are correct and some that are incorrect. What the believer must do is to follow the truth and what is correct, regardless of who says it.” •The salafi scholars are not against laymen following a madhhab but more against scholars being blind to their madhhab and fanatically following it even though the other madhhab has stronger proof. •Shaykh ‘Abd al-Kareemal-Khudayr There is nothing wrong with learning fiqh according to one of the four madhhabs, on condition that one follows the daleel (evidence) if it becomes apparent that the madhhab says something contrary to the daleel on a given matter, because obedience to Allaah and His Messenger comes before obedience to anyone else. It is also essential to have good manners towards other schools of thought and not to develop sectarian attitudes in opposing them. He should make the truth his aim and respect the opinions and efforts (ijtihaad) of the scholars. He should make discussing matters with them in a polite manner his method of reaching the truth, and he should advise people in a polite way if he thinks that they are mistaken. It is wrong for a person who is able to learn to refuse to do so on the grounds that only the scholars are able to understand the daleel. We do not say to one who is unable to engage in ijtihaad that he has to strive to derive rulings from the texts when he does not have the ability to do that and does not understand the principles; otherwise chaos would reign. But we do say that if you have some knowledge and understanding, you should at least know what the proof and daleel of your imaam (whom you are following) is, so that you can see the connection with the Qur’aan and Sunnah, and you can follow with some measure of insight and not be merely a bind follower. •May Allah guide us all to the correct practice of islam according to the understanding of the Righteous predecessors.
@@dianacruze1825 May Allah reward you for your suggestion. I will do more research in Sha Allah to always learn more. Can you tell me what is incorrect from what i said so it will make it easier my research? 🙂
In the school of Ahle sunnah waljamaah the rulings (sharia) are derived from: Primary sources 1.Quraan and sunnah 2. Rulings of the Khulafa e Rashidin (Abu Bakr, Umat Al Khattab, Usmaan Ibne Affan and Ali ibne Abi Taalib Radhiallahu anhum. Secondary sources 1.. Qiyas (analogy) 2. Ijmaa ( consensus) of opinions of the imams of fiqh Wallahu aalam
everyone claims they follow the quran & sunnah even Shia do...A salafi is the one who follow the Quran & Sunnah WITH the understanding of the Salaf (1st 3 generation)
@@AM-5d The real salafis my brother are the Ahle Sunnah wal jamaah. We RESPECT and FOLLOW the rulings of the Khulafa e Rashidin in ALL matters including 20 rakaah of terawih, 3 talaqs if given in one go counts as three etc. We do not pick and choose. The pseudo salafis while CLAIMING to follow the first 3 generations , disregard the rulings of the Khulafa e Rashidin. May Allah open their hearts to the haq. Ameen!
@@dhiaulhaq5958 Salafi are ahlus Sunnah/Hadith/Athar... Our disagreement isn't merely fiqhi position but is regarding 'Aqeedah...Where do the Asharis & Maturidis drive their 'aqeedah ?
No Imam or Shaykh ever blindly follwed a Madhab. Not even the Sahabah. Not even Sufiyan at Tawri, Ibn Uwayna, Abu Hanifa, Shafi, Malik, Ahmad, Ibn Maeen, Ibn Mubarak, Sooyouti, Barbahari. Bukhari, Muslim, Thirmidhi and so on never blindly followed a madhab...they did ittiba...As for authenticity of isnad then thats for the Muhadditoon. All imams said follow the hadeeth dont follow opinions blindly. Unless theres no evidence, so follow the opinion one is comfortable with. As long as hadeeth is saheeh, we are to follow. Unless there is a conflict in it's authentication amongst the Muhadditoon. Yes, We need madhab, we need to study them, but hadeeth is our priority. Opinions that have no evidence are baseless .
Shaikh Sultan al-Eid in Riyadh mentioned that be aware as Imam Abu Haneefah RH is like a door and gate to attack the rest and entire of the Fiqh as a whole, if he is attacked then it will open the door to attack the other 3 Madhab Imams then after that the rest of the classical scholars.
Madhab is a consistent system that you have to take it in entirety, because everything depends on each other, you can't pick up whatever you want as long it suits you, the closest analogy of Madhab is a law of a country, you can't take some laws and discard the rest, or create a combination from each country, the result is a system of laws that err with contradictions and discord. Madhab in Islam isn't about follow your opinion, but it follows a methodology that derived from Quran, Hadith, Consensus, and Analogical reasoning according to the jurisprudence principles of this Madhab. My suggest is to read a book about the history of the Islamic jurisprudence, and you will understand the reason behind their existence. The modern non-madhab is a state-manufactured by Suadi Arabia, and right now their funds is drying up, means that this non-madhab is fading. The four major madhab of Islam aren't manufactured by any state, but they originated by the efforts of independent Muslims scholars.
That’s not true at all. You must stay consistent on a madhhab on one subject, like a business contract (unless you simply follow a scholar who goes with evidence and not a madhhab itself). But there are MANY situations in which it is perfectly fine to go outside of one’s madhhab. Like, if you follow the Shafi’i madhhab on financial matters why would you have to follow it when it comes to touching your wife and wudu, when the Shafi’i position is clearly weak and has nothing to do with finances?
Asw finally listening to sense,unity amongst the Ummah,even if we follow different schools of thought our Nabi saw in his last sermon said all muslims constitute a brother hood.
Did he say all different sects constitute "brother hood". If you say "yes" then either your are truthful and Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu Alihi Wa Salam lied (in the Hadith of 73 sects and about those who do biddah) or you are speaking of something you do not know and thus might be misguiding others. So one should not speak without knowledge. Lying upon Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu alihi Wasalam has grave consequences. Read the Ahadith about one who lies upon Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu Alihi Wa Salam.
Muslims Following different groups doesn't bother me as long as they get along with one another & not committing shirk by calling up on the dead saints for help instead of Allah.
Shaykh Isma'il As-Salafi quoted in his book "Hujjiyat Hadith" Imam Ibnul Qayim saying in his "Sawa'iq Al- Mursalah": "Everybody knows that the Ahlul Hadith are the most truthful of all groups as said by Imam Ibn Al-Mubarak: “I found the religion to the Ahlul Hadith, the Kalam to the Mutazilah, the lies to the Rawafid and the tricks (Hyal) with Ahlur-Ray(people of opinion). """ HOW TRUE!!!!!!!
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble I know.. Yes... That's what we follow.. The early salaf... Also you should know that ahlulhadees of that time vehemently opposed ahlul rai(people of opinions) who were mostly ahnaaf at that time. Alhamdulillah, salafis follow the early ahlul hadees in their aqeeda.. Fiqhi approach and sulook(purification of the soul). Exactly why I keep challenging you to pik up few books from imams of salaf and read to know who are in their footsteps...
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble If you think current day Ahlul Hadith have deviated from original Ahlul Hadith, then think about how much more Ahnaf are deviated from original Ahnaf! Arguments goes both ways!
the problem with the blind followers of madhabs is that they don't accept a hadith if it differs with their madhab. For example, hanafis refuse to raise their hands coming up from rukoo ( رفع اليدين), no matter how many saheeh hadith report this.
even if they choose not to raise their hands and do Rafayadhayn despite the saheeh ahadeeth, their Salah is still valid however I don't get those who say doing Rafayadhayn is 'Bid'ah' or that it is wrong etc... Even Imam Abu Hanifa (rahimahullah) said that if there is a more authentic narration and mine contradicts it, follow the authentic one
I might be wrong but I believe within the Hanafi and Maliki Madhabs, the reason they don't follow hadith is because they preferred to follow the actions of the sahabah from that area. Maliki - Madinah and Hanafi - Kufa. There are reasons why? If you study you'll see it's not that black and white as made out to be.
I am a Muslim and have learned the last 10 years with and from Salafis, directly after my conversion. It has done me very well, I live in Egypt, learned proper Arabic, memorized a lot and have been doing dawah in my homeland with them. Masha Allah. La Quwwata illa billah. Have profited so much
Same here. Nobody compares to the salafis in terms of their adherence to the sunnah, enjoining the good and forbidding the evil. Teaching and encouraging the learning of the Arabic language so Islam can be accessible to all.
@@4ozking858 Emphasis on learning arabic is also bcoz the truth should be accessible to all... As books written by salafussaliheen are in arabic😊. Stay blessed my brother.. May Allah grant patience to the ghurba of this ummah.
Additionally I oppose the understanding that Hanbali Fiqh is hard to access: 1. There are MANY students in the UK who graduated from Qaseem, Madeenah and Riyaadh. Also those who graduated from online programs from the likes of Shaikh Quaimi, Aamir Bhajhat and Mutlaq Al Jaasir. 2. Many of the main texts are translated now. Daleel Ut Talib, Akhsar Mukhtasaraat, Umdah Ut Taalib, Zaad Ul Mustaqni', Umdah Al Fiqh are all translated. And there is the commentary of Zaad Ul Mustaqni' and also Mulakkhas Al Fiqhi which is based on Zaad Al Mustaqni. 3. No Madhab is easy to access via the texts in and of themselves. They have to be studied under a Shaikh or an Ustaadh who has precision in the said book.
Our primary difference with Deobandis, Sufis and the likes is not that of Fiqh. It is one of the common tactics used by Deobandis to discredit the Salafiyyah by portraying it as a ghair madhhabi movement, which is completely false. Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan, hafidhahullaah, said: “The issue of sticking to a madhhab has in it some detail. If a person has the ability to know the ruling from its proof, and to deduce the ruling from its proof, then it is not permitted for him to cling to a madhhab. rather, it is upon him to take the ruling from the evidence if he has the ability to do so. However, this is rare amongst the people, since this is a quality of the mujtahideen from the people of knowledge; those that have reaced the levels of ijtihaad. As for one who is not like that, then he cannot take the rulings directly from the evidences. And this is the predominant case amongst the people, especially in these latter times. So [in such a case] there is no harm in adopting one of the four madhhabs and making taqleed of one of them. However, he should not make blindtaqleed such that he takes all that is in the madhhab; whether it is correct or incorrect. Rather, it is upon him to take from the madhhab that which - in his view - does not clearly oppose the evidence. As for those views in themadhhab which clearly oppose the evidence, then it is not permissible for the Muslim to take it. Rather it is upon him to adopt what is established by the proof, even if it is in another madhhab. So his leaving the madhhab for another madhhab in order to follow the evidence is something good; this is a matter which is good - rather it is obligatory; since following the evidence is an obligation.” _____ Our main difference with Deobandis and the likes is on Aqeedah and Manhaj. Deobandis follow Maturidi aqeedah, which is an innovated aqeedah, contrary to the teachings of the salaf. We don't tolerate the deviants and murtadeen like Ibn Arabi, who invented the Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood (blatant shirk), unlike Deobandis who praise and give justifications for his kufri writings. We don't sit with Ahlul Biddah and nor do we tolerate any practice that is not authentically proven from Rasool Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم. Salafiyyah is called Salafiyyah because we follow the way of the Salaf.
Knowledge as Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim Rahimahullah stated is; 'Knowledge is what Allaah and His Messenger said. (Knowledge is also) what the Companions said, void of any concealment or disguise... Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim also said; Knowledge is: to know the guidance based upon its proofs...blind following is not equal to this in any way'
The problem is a lack of education in Islamic matters. I wonder how things would have been if we had united on Quranic Arabic as our lingua franca. From there it would have been easy to gain an understanding in Islam as this would be a standard for everyone. From an early age, knowing Fohsa would elevate our status spiritually and in worldly affairs (Quranic Arabic is amazingly logical). We would be a huge step closer to understanding our deen and thus these Satanic attitudes would not be able to touch us.
This video is a lie and sitting up hate. I've been Salafi for almost 30 years and we have never been taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught (from imam Abu hanifa, imam Malik, imam Ahmed, and imam Shafi's words), that we must not be fanatical about the scholar / imam we learn from.
@@SonGoku-io7shNot hardcore? I say that deobandi Islam understands Allaahs asmat wa sifat in an innovated manner, like the ashari's. And they are sufi, although not as astray as the brewli sufis. This is why we can perform salaht behind them, but not behind open brewlis. And I say that their version of hanafi fique is not fully representative of imam Abu hanifas madhab. Rahimullaah. And I say to the ignorant on this issue, thatI fall under the description of madkhali, although that lebal is nonsense for anyone. I hope that confirm I am so called hardcore. ** However, that doesn't change the fact the we are not taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught from the imams of old and present that we must not completely blindly follow a madhab when we reach a good age or level of understanding, nor be fanatical. .. And my 30 years includes traveling n meeting Salafis in many countries n Ulema too. And I say that this video is based upon a lie and stiring up hate. May Allaah have mercy upon us all.
@@headfones1000 Brother you should not speak out of ignorance. Of course I make excuses for you to say you are ignorant rather than lying on purpose, as you accused this video of doing. I mean you are a self professed Madkhali yet you are trying to convey your group as so softly spoken and never having done any wrong. To call you a liar would indeed be easy based on the behaviour of those which you follow. However I don't wish to personally attack you as I do not know your actions away from this comments section. As for blind following, if you don't blind follow your "Sheikhs", what else do you do? That is one of the biggest contradictions in your Madkhali ideology because you have no clue what your Saudi Sheikhs rulings are based on. You don't even know what your pseudo-Sheikhs fatwas are based on, yet you do Taqlid of them and spit these fatwas out. Your problem with this video is simple. It states the truth as everyone knows and the truth hurts. This video has more home truths than your Madkhali "Sheikhs" have spoken about in the last 20+ years. The Madkhalis are a corrupt organisation yet you are attempting to perform damage limitations for them, so they hold onto relevancy by the skin of their teeth and corrupt the Ummah to the best of their ability. May Allah protect us from the corruption of the Madakhila and other corruptors. To ask your opinion on sifaat of Allah is like asking for financial advise from a toddler.
@@SonGoku-io7sh You went along with what I said in my first comment, but you made the assumption that I'm not the type of Salafi that the speaker in this video refered to. I then gave you detailed info to describe myself so that you realise I am what people erroneously describe as madkhaki. Instead of you then accepting that the video is clearly wrong, you accuse me of lying, while at the same time admitting you don't know my character. Do you even know what the erroneous label of madkhaki means? And the ahlul ilm that we follow are in South Asia, Kuwait, Sudan, etheopia, Nigeria, yemen and many other places, NOT just Saudia. The fact that you refered to Saudi scholars demonstrates that you follow sterio types just like the speaker does in the video. And I don't think you know what blind following means. It means obeying all Islamic teachings from someone (other than the Prophet, ﷺ), without knowing or hearing if its from Al kitaab wa sunnah... Yes a child can do this, or an adult in an emergency with time constraints can ask an Alim for a ruling and follow it without knowing what text. Ayat or hadith it's based upon. .. But that's the exception.
Shaykh Al Albani stated; Therefore, it is not possible for any Muslim to independently understand the Book and the Sunnah. Rather one must seek aid in understanding them by returning to the understanding of the noble Companions, who took their understanding from the Prophet sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam; via his statements, his actions and his tacit approvals. Thus, along with calling to the Book and the Sunnah, it is absolutely essential to attach to this the understanding and the practice of the Salafus-Saalih (the Pious Predecessors: the first three generations of Muslims whose excellence has been testified to in the above hadeeth); acting upon the preceding verses and hadeeth, which order clinging to the path of the Believers, which has been explained to be the path upon which the Prophet sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, his Companions and those who followed them in beliefs and actions, were upon. Taken from al-Asaalah magazine (11/84-87) : Al Albani said: Thus, the day the Muslims return to understanding their religion as the Companions of Allaah’s Messenger sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam understood it; and then act upon this purified Islaam in the correct manner, in all aspects of life, then that will be the day that the Muslims will rejoice at the help of Allaah and His victory. Statement of Shaykh Al Albani in Al Asaalah Magazine istiqaamah.net/the-foundation-of-the-islamic-awakening/
How do we know how the sahabah's followed and interpreted Quran and Sunnah, how has their understanding been passed down that when they came across this verse or this hadeeth, they understood it like this and they did this. Where is this written and which books. or should we just take a scholars word for it. How do scholars verify their own understanding. Example 'Pray as you have seen me pray', who saw the Prophet pray, The Sahabah, who saw the Sahaba pray, the ones that came after them. Both Imam Malik and Abu Hanifa came not that far after. Wouldn't their understanding and how they prayed be much closer. Are there any books to say that this is how the Sahaba prayed? How did scholars gain this knowledge that when they read a verse of the Quran or Hadeeth, whatever they immediately know this is what the sahabahs would've done. Not trying to disparage Shaykh Albani, love him and respect him. Just trying to understand...
This video is a lie and he's deliberately setting up hate. I've been Salafi for almost 30 years and we have never been taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught (from imam Abu hanifa, imam Malik, imam Ahmed, and imam Shafi's words), that we must not be fanatical about the scholar / imam we learn from.
I gather this Shaykh came across a Salafi who is either new, ignorant or extreme. Just to correct Anti Salafis..Salafi dawah is a manhaj built upon principles from the Qur'an and ahadeeth as understood by the Salad as Salih in all issues..They give importance to adhering to the correct Aqeedah, methodology, understanding...they advocate following evidence. Following the Ulamah, madhab based on evidence and not taqleed. We all have intellect, reason. Generally we all can read and understand...if not so, then no doubt we will be doing taqleed and not ittiba.
To understand a madhab, you have to study it. If you think a madhab are just statements of Imams e.g. the Hanafi madhab is 'what Imam Abu Hanifa said' then this isn't what a madhab is. Please go study under a known scholar from that madhab. Every single person I've come across who doesn't follow a madhab, always says you shouldn't follow a madhab, you should follow Quran and Sunnah, or this is the corret ruling or what you're following is incorrect ruling. but when pressed further can't explain what a madhab is and what the methodology of each madhab is, examples of rulings from the madhab and then analysing and critiquing both the evidence and the methodology. It shows me 2 things 1) They make statements without studying 2) Those who taught them also dont know. I personally cannot say their ruling they are following is correct or incorrect. If you are going to go around imposing fiqh rulings on others and speaking on behalf of Allah and His Messenger then please have the knowledge to back it up. If you can't then how can you expect me to listen to you and how can I justify to Allah why I Iistened to you. PS. I'm from the UK, here there are 2 groups of Salafis, I'm mainly referring to one particular group of them whose followers act like this. Also if you want to understand a particular group, go spend some time with them, observe and listen their most well known scholars and try to understand their point of view over a period of time on different topics, this should give a general view of them. It would be unfair of me to judge 'salafis' based on what a 'sufi', 'deobandi' , 'barelvi' said. In the same way it would be unfair of me to judge others solely based on what 'salafis' say. If you want to stick to your 'group' only that's fine but don't impose this on others. A salafi Scholar taught me one of the most important lessons of my life. Intention prior to attending a class or listening to scholar. Your intention should be of purely one of learning and understanding. Your intent should not be 'I'll use this to debate others, this gives me another point to argue on this issue. Let me catch some mistakes, let me find something to refute him on. It's quite clear in the comment section some comments have been made without listening to what was said.
When it comes to matters of the shariah everyone follows the scholar they trust, certain level of knowledge and understanding is required. But with everything else please think and reflect yourself as well. The scholars I follow taught me ignorance cannot be excused on the day of judgement and you cannot hide behind scholars on the day of judgement.
To leave islam that which is based on the Quran and ahadeeth as understood by the Salaf as-Salih and the Ulamaj based in evidence is maturity, progress? To blind follow imams and Scholars is maturity and progress?
Salafis were never anti madhab, but anti taqleed of one individual scholar. Salafis follow all 4 madhahib. Our ‘aqeedah is also the same as the ‘aqeedah of the four imaams.
Anyone can refute you easily. Care to show any Hadith of why a woman prayer is different than a man's prayer in Hanafi Fiqh? You will not find any. Instead you will know that the Sahabi women prayed just like men. Do you have a Hadith that tells you that Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him forbade people from praying 1 rakah witr? You will not find any. Instead you will see that Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu alihi wa Salam himself prayed 1 witr. In Hanafi Fiqh, there is no 1 rakah witr. So if you follow the above then you are a blind follower of Imam Abu Hanifa when you should be a blind follower of Prophet Muhammad pace be upon him. You really should study Islam and may Allah keep you adhering to the Quran and the Sunnah. Aameen.
Are you trying to refute me? If so, I'm no scholar and therefore I've not concluded any rulings about anything so there is nothing to refute there. If you are saying to refute either madhab in general or the hanafi madhab specifically, then, again, I'm no scholar who has concluded any rulings so you should go and speak to an actual scholar about refutations.
@rahilhabib Your very statement that "blind following" applied most certainly to aqeedah "but not fiqh". Is what I am talking about. Why would you say such a thing when you are not a scholar? Is this what Allah says in the Quran? Or do you have a Hadith supporting your opinion? Allah warns us to not speak without knowledge.
@@salikidrees2968 does الله not say in the Qur'an 'they believe as their forefathers believed'. This is in reference to their aqeedah where they refused to believe anything besides what their forefathers believed and taught them. The same apliies to one who says they are Muslim only because their parents are Muslim and therefore they are Muslim. No, you have to believe yourself individually. Elsewhere in the Qur'an, الله says 'if you do not know then ask those who have knowledge' referring to rulings of Islam. I am, of course paraphrasing from the English translation here.
@rahilhabib Yes Allah says this but what does it have to do with "blind following" "but not fiqh"? I am not understanding if you are promoting this speaker or you are speaking against him or against Salafis?
In Central Asia official state Hanafi religious departments are on their mission from the opposite direction, forcing people out of mosques for rasing hands, they can stop prayer half way for Ameen outloud, even sometimes call police to fine worshipers. Hanafi school has been here for ages and absorbed all traditions
My dear brother. The Ummah was a lot more united before the issue got spread of trying to work out for ourself from the Quran and Sunnah directly. And before we had scholars with good intentions who started to call us to not stick to follow one of the 4 Fiqh Madhabs. Also yes absolutely we should unite upon the Quran and Sunnah but what does that mean? 6000 verses of the Quran are simple and easy to understand and act upon for any Muslim, in fact millions of non-muslims have entered into Islaam just from reading the Quran as it’s easy, the vast majority is very easy. The rest of the 500 or so verses are more difficult somewhat and they are related usually to the matters of Fiqh. They need extraTafseer and explanation. Sometimes the explanations just for those 500 or so verses termed as Aayaatul Ah’kaam, they go into volumes by themselves. Each of the 4 Fiqh Madhabs have their Tafseer books just for these verses alone in volumes and sometimes they comment in extra detail on those verses whilst explaining the whole Qur'an. So we can and always did unite upon the Quran by busying ourselves with the 6000 verses and by letting the scholars explain the other 500 or so verses about the rulings/ah’kaam/halal and haram, …. Then we can do the same with the Hadeeth/Sunnah. Thousands of them are authentic and only some of those are for Ah’kaam-Rulings that need more explanations. To top that those types of hadeeth a lot of times conflict each other apparently and this is only one of the various services that the 4 Fiqh Madhabs provided by writing books and explanaing in detail on hadeeth that seem to contradict each other. Like the different hadeeths about not when the Fajr time enters in but the time best for Fard Fajr Prayer to be prayed in Jama’ah. (In the eastern city of Ih’saa of Saudi Arabia if you miss in Jama’ah the Fajr or ASR then you can catch it in the Hanafi Masjids, they have 4 Fiqh Madhabs in that city, maybe this happens in Cairo also I’m guessing). But point being, yes we can unite and usually did for 1300 years upon the Quran and Sunnah easily as the vast majority like 90% of the Quran are Sunnah don’t need Tafseer to get a good basic understanding and act upon them. Only in the last 100 years the calls to not learn or follow or give fatwa upon one of the 4 Madhabs has divided the Ummah very badly, it was a slip up and devils deception and we ask Allah to forgive the scholars who called to it and we do them a favor by clarifying their error so that they have less followers to follow their wrong way. They had good intentions but wrong is wrong and must be pointed out for the better of the UNITY of the Ummah which is a lot more important than some scholars. You can get Tafseer for the 6000 easier verses for extra benefits but it’s not needed to understand enough to act upon those texts. As for the remaining 10% then we unite easily simply by following one of the 4 Madhabs as a way to quickly understand those remaining texts of the Quran and Sunnah. We can't stop our daily lives for 10 years just to try and understand directly ourselves, rather we have scholars and these 4 Madhabs are just different ways to understand those texts. Many big top notch scholars attested that way who were alot bigger in levels too for 1000 years, so lets use some common sense. And not to forget, sometimes they all agree on many issues of Fiqh and sometimes they disagree because some issues of the Arabic grammar are differed over maybe. Sometimes over if a narrator in the chain of a hadeeth if he met that Sahaabi or not. Or if the narration speaking about the reasons why a verse was revealed or a why an important incident in a hadeeth in this issue is authentic or not, which can prove or disprove the actual wisdom behind the hadeeth or not. So 4 imams and their students and their students who became high level, developed systems to gather, analyse, deduce, reconcile between different narrations and so on. Hope u understand my dear brother. Can any medical student study with one university some chapters and topics then some days go to a totally different university for other chapters and another university for the remaining? And they keep doing this for 4 years. Will they pass their degree? Will they even gain a real solid understanding or have major holes in their studies? Will it be even legal or accepted or looked upon as mad? And just because we have very rare odd and biased or fanatical statements of very few of the scholars within the later scholars from the 4 Fiqh Madhabs doesn't mean we disregard them, those statements were rebuked and pointed out.
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble United? Like how? When for nearly six hundred years there were four musallas around the kaaba? That's unity what prophet left behind this ummah on? In every century there were imams n scholars of repute who challenged the concept of blind following.... Educate yourself.
You probably remember that Southern California had a big salafi inclination. I moved away and then moved back 16 years later. I see salafis attending Mawlids now! We need you back shaykh, you were 20 years ahead of you’re time.
And it is a merit how? Since when did attending Mawlid became the Yard Stick? If people start falling of the cliff, you will think of it as a good thing? Did Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu alihi Wa Salam and his companions, or Tabiyeen or Atba Tabiyeen ever celebrate Mawlid? Do you even know who introduced it and when? If any Salafi start attending Mawlids then he is either ignorant or he has gone astray/deviated from the way of Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him and his companions. And we all know what happens to an astray sheep/goat. It either falls off the cliff or falls pray.
@@salikidrees2968what he wanted to convey is that, they are much more integrated with the wider sunni community. If someone doesn't want to do a mawlid, which can be broadly categorized as a Halaqa of Zikr, if you remove all the terminologies, which has huge precedence for, Then it's not a big issue at All, doing or not doing it is not from the Fard and waajibat.
@kledmohd4230 May Allah help you and grow you in the correct knowledge of Islam as practiced by Sahaba, Tabiyeen and Taba Tabiyeen and make you grow to learn the definition of biddah. Aameen. There will come a time when Muslims will call alcohol with a different name. It does not change the fact that it is still alcohol.
Abu Haneefa was a salafi because he was a tabi'een, not a hanafi as the mufti claims. I also wouldn't be so sure to say all those who claim to be followers of his madhhab are doing it correctly as he understood Islam.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: No one has to blindly follow any particular man in all that he enjoins or forbids or recommends, apart from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). The Muslims should always refer their questions to the Muslim scholars, following this one sometimes and that one sometimes. If the follower decides to follow the view of an imam with regard to a particular matter which he thinks is better for his religious commitment or is more correct etc, that is permissible according to the majority of Muslim scholars, and neither Abu Haneefah, Maalik, al-Shaafa'i or Ahmad said that this was forbidden. Majmoo' al-Fataawa, 23/382.
Common sense, if I don't know about maths I'll ask a maths teacher, if I don't know about engineering I'll ask an engineer, etc Quran reinforces this just incase anyone is confused But asking people who have memorised something isn't knowledge but the same as a data bank , they just process information from memory, dosent mean they're knowledgeable
Assalam o Alaykum Alhamdulillah I have ordered mufti sb fiqh Al Imam . Jazak Allah khair for explaining on the subject . Can mufti sb team share name of Molana zakariya book please
I dont generally know who the sheikh mixes with. Yes he is right other than the madkhalis, all of the scholars who ascribe to what he calls ' Salafi ' follow the hanbali madhab and they teach and study books in the hanbali madhabs. Many of my teachers when they teach Hanbali they only stick to the madhab. On the contrary, is he trying to say that Hanafi's leave other people alone when they don't do things the way they do? I've been told my salah is invalid because I don't pray the Hanafi way. Anti Madhab is one extreme and the other extreme is also fanaticism to a madhab
Following madhab is taking an intermediary We are supposed to be taught language and the meanings of words. So when we read Quran we get direct guidance from Allah through the pure ones who guard the arsh ( weltunshaung ) they guard and are the only ones who have access to the book (;your mind ) yes these are the angels of the arsh not the cartoon or Christian rendering of a Throne head gear or a kursi being a chair,👈 kursi indicates apparatus which is the physical could be your brain and body , Allah does not sit on a chair Quran is a prophetless System, you get direct guidance from reading the book , and it takes great efforts, you have to really study the meanings of words and their origins because what we have today in the tafseer is corrupted, that's why Hadith and any past literature is valuable for linguistic purposes not to take those Hadith narratives and put them on top of Quran like everyone is doing
A-R-SH is a root word indicates a framework, like a trellis, scaffold, So when Allah talks about being lord of the arsh he's talking about the cognitive framework of an individual,
Brother. There is so much to learn from the 4 a‘imma of the madhahib. I am a student in Egypt and my Mashayikh are Hanafee and Shafi‘ee. I agree with the statement that rejection of Madhahib is extremism just as single-madhhab fanaticism is. All scholars of the salaf that I know of studied fiqh in a madhhab.
Using the term a "salafi" today, ore labeling people with that term, it is totally wrong and pretty problematic!!! The salafis war the best generation in our history, and best exemlpe for us as the ummah, for following their fotstaps!! Of course that we as a ahlu sunnah wal jamaah, we are by difoullt foloweres of our salafs and khalefs, but all those nolidges and informations, comes through the legal schools of low (mathhabs). Than this lecture explained by shaykh Ambdurahmam it is very very beneficial for layman people, who are the victims ore could be potential victims of some so called sudo "salafis" ore Saudi (medkhalis), who thay have phd on creating fitnah !!! I have great respekt for sheikh Adburahaman Yusuf Mangera, despite some desagreaments about some irelevant issues! Anyway sheikh dr.Akram Nadwi and sheikh Dr.Abdurahman, without a doubt are one of the most prominent, respected and nolidgable schoollars in UK, like Dr.sheikh Yaseer Qadhy and Dr.sheikh Hamza Yusuf in USA, and like many other prominent shuyukhs in dhe world. May Allah protect all the ummah from all fitnas, and united our hearts upon the truth.
If you think Yasir qadi and hamza Yusuf are good honest knowledgeable scholars in USA,than brother with all honest you don't have any knowledge about their agenda of, watering down the islam to the more liberalized Verizon, reforming islam,pro LGBTQ..pro mixing of the opposite sex even in the masjids..I used to listen to these two so called "scholars/shyukh" but allhamdullellah I came across brother danyal haqiqatjoe ".. please search"the hidden agenda of Yasir qadi to reform islam " by danyal haqiqatjoe..
Its easy, stick to the Traditional Sunni Schools, I learnt thats the simplist and best and most authentic, the hard way. wasted 25 years before that bro.
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble the “Traditional” Islam is what the prophet was upon, what his sahaba were upon and the tabi’een and atbaa at tabi’een. Not what came out of India in the early 20th century in a town called deoband.
So salafis are not united? And hanafis are united??? Wow.. Can't get more hilarous than this... Hanafi deobandi Hanafi barelwi Hanafi deobandi hayati Hanafi deobandi mamati And also the sheikh seems to have forgtten the ugly fights between two factions of tableegh jamaath in masaajids People got killed in Bangladesh sheikh. Like our religion warned us" If you have no shame than do what you want"
No...ghair muqallid and salafis are not united. They also do takfeer of each other. Barelwi and deobandi differ in aqeedah not fiqh. You guys fight over fiqh and aqeedah.
P.s tableegh isn't opposite of being muqallid or ghair muqallid. Many salafi brothers are active In this effort. To be tablighi doesn't oppose you being salafi. That's a misconception and a wrong perception.
@@anisdesai4692 so aqeeda is more important or fiqh? You need to learn basics my brother... You are downplaying aqeeda so Casually.. That's the difference between you and salafis....
@@anisdesai4692 salafis might be friendly and cooperative towards tableegh people but they don't approve of them wholly and also make clear where they are deviated.... Salafi ulemas were more far sighted than deobandi hanfi ulemas as they were the ones who first warned about the deviations of tabligh jamat... Now the biggest deobandi seminary in the world Darululoom deoband itself has issued so many fatawaas against them... Check first before you talk... From a former deobandi tablighhi to a salafi, Alhamdulillah i know what iam talking about... Do your homework before you post online next time..
Brother Mangera i started to follow you few months ago, i am revert from Finland 21 years ago...seaking knowlege and i love your style to tell clearly things that i understand Islam better...you are a pearl to give knowledge Alhamdulillah
Sheikh Mangera *
Alhamdulillah sister. We are fortunate to have one of the best and proper scholar in this time. My advice would be to stick to his lectures and guidance.
Indeed Shaykh is a great Scholar ❤
@@TheTemporary1ne he is not a scholar
@@FazsterHQkeep crying
Mufti is a thoroughly decent person , I had the pleasure of being in a group that was alongside mufti on hajj in 2019.
I was freed from 25 years of Wahhabiya influence on one Rabiul Awwal month الحمد لله
الحمد لله
Alhamdullilah!!
SUBhANALLAH GLORY HOLYNESS BE ALLAH
I am just in love how Dr mufti Abdur Rahman sahab damad barkatuhum settled the issue with intellect peace and love ❣️ jazakallah for bringing such a peaceful lecture to us
Took him 17years to realise that "Salafi's" laymen do not take directly from Quran & Sunnah directly without using Scholars. Issue remains there is no obligation to stick to any mathab. It is different to for a learned person who actually understand the usool of the mathab and follows that usool. However there is no proof for a laymen to adopt any mathab exclusively. Laymen asks someone of knowledge he trusts. Does not matter if he is Hanbali Shafi Hanafi or maliki or thahiri. Sadly I find this type of basic misinformation by someone who seems to be familiar with salafis for over 2 decades to be so clueless. Grins and ridicules. I don't think this man is someone I would take seriously.
The deobandis who think about donkeys in their salah
Well done. You did this without pointing fingers, ridiculing, in the most respectable manner to make your point.
This video is a lie and sitting up hate.
I've been Salafi for almost 30 years and we have never been taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught (from imam Abu hanifa, imam Malik, imam Ahmed, and imam Shafi's words), that we must not be fanatical about the scholar / imam we learn from.
@headfones1000 Exactly. It is funny (actually sad) that those who know nothing about Salafiyyah get on podiums and give hours long speeches misguiding people or spreading lies.
One can catch him right away when he started asking people about naming 5 scholars, blah blah.
And what about other Madahib as there were more than 4? Zahiri, etc.
Was Imam Abu Hanifa a Hanafi?
Was Imam Malik a Maliki?
Was Imam Shafi a Shafii?
Was Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal a Hanbali? No.
They were all Salafis. Alhamdulillah
@@salikidrees2968 how? You guys are a misguided sect, you associate body parts with Allah, and commit lots of problems within the ummah. You guys are cursed
@@headfones1000have you watched the entire video? This brother was in the Salafi dawah
@@salikidrees2968have you watched the entire video? This brother was in the Salafi dawah
I’m a Salafi and have wasted 25 years with them. I now have to relearn everything from the detail matters all over. I’m researching and asking Allah to guide me more and more. You Shaikh have clarified so many matters to me now. So too Abu Aaliyah. May Allah bless you and your family all in this life and the next. I believe it’s never too late. I hope I can re-learn properly now.
Alhamdulilah brother I was young when I started with them but it only lasted a few years. I saw through their character and hypocrisy.
I caught them many times lying about "ijmaa" and thats when I knew they have a gang mentality.
Not wasted bro. I'm sure you've gained a lot of knowledge which you can rechannel
Say: I 'was' a salafi and continue with your journey to the Hereafter
May Allah bless you and grant you tawfeeq. He can bring levels in an instant coming on you. Just always think positive about Him
Weak
ma sha Allah. your fiqh al-imam book brought me so much clarity. i used to be salafi - as a revert myself and i’ve noticed too that for born muslims who decide to begin practicing - especially if their families aren’t, they tend to follow salafiyyah. i think this is… for both parties due to ignorance and also the accessibility of resources from salafi funded projects.
but alhamdullilah, you help me with my islam. such a beautiful book that is concise yet it provides the necessary detail when needed
My dear brother, I'm still in shock how I wrote on the cover of my copy in black permanent marker many years ago that this book needs refuting LOLLLLLLLL I thank Allah for having opened my eyes
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble Muhammad the Brit? Asalamu alaikum, im Ayyub the Brit haha😅
and trust me bro. a dear brother recommended me the book and i remember opening it looking for faults but subhan’Allah it had none!
may Allah guide u back to truth
@@zatheonladdie5715 lolllll I would go all in with the Hanafi Madhab but I've got used to the Hanbali Madhab a lot. Otherwise if I could turn back the clock I'd stick with it, very strong and solid, the Big voluminous works of the Hanafis take you into a different world, the early Madhabs never relied only on Hadeeth alone, never, they also used the Fiqh and Fatawas of the sahaaba and tabi'een and Maraseel Hadeeth and so much more. I'm going to keep adding comments for extra points as I can see fanatics here.
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble
Over simplification of complex issues!
The hanafi fiqh has some core fallacies/disagreement with the Muhaddiseen (including maalik, Shafiee and Ahmad), such as the Ahnaaf reject the zyadti of Hadith over the hukm of Qur'aan (a pass for hadith rejectors), the Ahnaaf consider istihsaan as a valid legal proof, they also are not in favour of hadees being a proof in itself rather it has to comply with the core principles which their fuqaha have agreed upon! Else the hadeeth is explained away or considered as abrogated!
(Another pass for hadeeth rejectors)
This is the reason why the muhaqiqeen among the hanafees such as Ibne Hummam, Imam zailai, shah Waliullah dehlavi and Abdul hayy lakhnavi have rejected these principles of Ahnaaf and have declared Imam Abu Haneefa free of these fabricated usool!
Ref: Hujjatullahil baaligha of Shah Waliullah dehlavi Rahimahullah.
As for the mutaqadimeen of the hanafee mazhab they all were ahlul hadith, the foremost among them being Qazi Abu Yousuf Rahimahullah.
I think many of us have had exposure to Salafi dawah. Alhamdulillah even for that, because there was a long time when that was the only way to learn our Salah, etc. Our mistakes made us learn to ask questions and take corrections, alhamdulillah. I find that many Muslims who were handed the deen and didn't have a struggle arriving at the correct way are willing to throw it away instantly for the next alphabet agenda or remove hijab, or excuse riba, etc. Alhamdulillah for our struggles to understand madhahib and work on ourselves.
What mistake was exposed of salafis
@just_akh4694 I'm not sure about the new generation, but in our time, there was a lot of accusations of kufr and nifaq of people "not in the salafi da'wah and the ideas that only the Salafi dawah is on the saved sect and anyone following a madhhab would be in hell. Many self appointed imams that never even studied under a proper chain.
Sheikh, go to the valley of Hadramawt, Yemen. That’s the practical of the sunnah. I believe that’s the last remaining place on earth practicing all the Sunnah. It is also the specific place Sayiddina Abu Bakr As-Siddique made 3 specific duas for the inhabitants and its land. A truly hidden gem. It is known as the “land of the auliya.”
Also a place called dammaj in Yemen has the same qualities
Isn’t dammaj supported by Saudi government?
Not really, many are misguided there
Whoever titles these videos knows how to get us to stand on our tippie toes, maa shaa Allah. I am on the edge of my seat waiting for this one to drop إن شاء الله.
Assalamu Alaykum from Kurdistan region. I love you for the sake of Allah
JazaakALLAH Sheikh, the voice of common sense prevails Maa Sha ALLAH
Make the Sunnah of grooming, dressing well and looking good great again!
My Heart really moved watching this the school system in the USA really knocked me off my square. Masha ‘Allah I’ve been lead here.
Alhmdl now I understand that the 4 Fiqh Madhabs are just systems and frameworks to study Fiqh and produce Fatwas with extreme amounts of research gone into producing their foundations and then were refined by mountains of top scholars that the Ummah has never seen since centuries. It’s impossible rather foolish to even try in some sort of way to re-invent the wheel. I remember Shaikh I bought your Book about the proofs and the angles for the Prayer before many years and I wrote on it with a permanent black on the front “This book needs refuting and should only be read by students of knowledge”!!! All I did 4 months ago is I turned to Allah SWT and said maybe I’m wrong. I’m sure actually I’m wrong because can the Salafis, especially the Madkhali which I was close to, how can they be Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah when they don’t do any Jama’ah as they keep splitting up more and more amongst themselves not to forget they split the Ahle Hadeeth Masjids up in the UK wherever they are. Plus they warn from even praying in other masjids of traditional Sunni Muslims. So I asked Allah to guide me along the way and after plenty of careful research it became very clear I’ve been misguided and been misguiding others in the issues of Aqeedah and Fiqh and Purification of the Soul. Issues of Bid’ah were turned into Major Kufr and Major Shirk. Where Imam ibn Taymiyyah went against the Salaf we have been following him and promoted that. Where Imam Muhammad ibn Wahhab had major errors we followed and promoted it and we made judgements based upon all of this and much more. We mocked and boycotted. We misquoted. We even had many major contractions. We believed we were the Saved sect so look down on others and thought we were the most blessed and so never gave even 5% of what is needed to practice the Pillar of Ih’saan termed as Tazkiyyatu Nafs/Purification of the Soul. Why as we thought us being from the saved sect will save us. We would judge by clothing and appearance too. If you got a turban or Salwar Kameez or say Hazrat so and so or such and such book Shareef then we would say he’s dodgy at best. I’m researching and going to summarise this all with a list of sources for more details soon to give out to the more sincere open minded Salafis. We need to make a lot of Dua for our Salafi brothers and sisters. I don’t think any of the heads of this group will repent as they will lose everything as in reality their Eemaan is weak because they lack in purification of the Soul. They don’t look after their heart. So they will hold onto their followings and positions. The pleasure of Allah is last. They are used to the status. They will fight against us to maintain their status. They don’t want to look foolish. To be found out they have been misguided and misguiding many others. They know they’ll have re-learn a lot. The salafis don’t even learn or teach simple Fiqh properly. It’s all upside down. I’m re/learning how. I wasted 25 years. I hope to save many others to not waste many years of their life too. Make plenty of Dua for me. I have now a mountain to climb. It took me a lot of courage to admit I was wrong and accept the haqq. Just to research with an open heart was hard enough. But it’s like Allah made it easy to understand. Jzkl
Mashallah Mashallah
What’s your Email akhi id like to learn from you
Lol you gotta learn how to add spaces in between the paragraphs in your thesis 😅.
Was going to read it, then hit "read more" and saw how messy it looked.
Oh well, im happy for you... or, im sorry for your loss 🙃
@@snakejuce apologies I rushed
So you decided on the whole manhaj of salaf based on the mistakes of a bunch of overzealous individuals?? Great😄
So which hanafi you are gonna follow now?? Deobandi? Barelwi? Deobandi hayaati? Deobandi mamaati? Also their tableegh jamaath split into two.. Markaz vs shoora... Their own deobandi scholars have issued fatwas against them... So you see pretty lot of unity among deobandis?? 😊
So sad you decided not to follow those scholars whose pious forefathers eliminated shirk(to a very large extent) from the pious lands of hijaz and stopped the biddath of four different musallas around the kaaba... And decided to follow those who euologise concepts like wahdatul wujood... So imam taymiyyah was wrong? Well then what about those imams who invented concepts like wahdatul wujood which has blatant shirk in it?? Whom deobandis praise to no end... Wallahi, Allah guides those whom he wills.
Mistakes of imam taymiyyah in what? You read his books or are you parroting what his opponents alleged about him?
No one is infallible apart from beloved prophet SAW thou... U need honesty man not decision based on whims and desires.
I think we have made fiqh dry of taqwa.
One thing ALL of us, whether scholars or normies, have to make sure to remember and consider always, is that at the end of it all, ALLAH is the one who will judge whether we have most sincerely chosen an fiqh opinion or we have chosen, instead, based on our desires.
We have to fear ALLAH when choosing the best path to ALLAH and even more so when we judge others on their fiqhi choices and opinions.
Let's all come back to taqwa of ALLAH.
1:04:35 Well said!
Absolutely spot on. This is why I always laugh and reply to them, "we all follow Quran and Sunnah... the 4 imams followed and studied the Quran and the Sunnah."
I guess for some, they prefer placing a monopoly and an ownership of the Quran/Sunnah. "Us vs them" dynamics, a boatload of group-think, and a bigger boat-load of jahils.
The four imams followed the sunnah but not all their followers follow the sunnah. Pakistan is full of innovators who love shrines etc
@@jimmykahn5431 true they have a lot of innovators is this guy an innovator?
@@jimmykahn5431 he was right about madhkalis though
@@thewariscomingtoatownneary7572 I’m not saying this guy is as I do not have the knowledge to give fatwa on individuals. However I have seen Pakistanis in big groups go to shrines and do sujood infront of graves in Lahore.
@@jimmykahn5431eeyazanbillah that is evil
I listened to this and I have a few things to say:
1. Most of the 'Salafi Fiqh' is based upon the Madhab of Imam Ahmad. And even Shaikh Muhammadi Ibn Abdul Wahhab was Hanbali. However, modern Hanbali scholars like Shaikh Bin Baaz, Uthaimeen, Sa'di, Fawzaan etc go against the Mu'tamad of the Madhab at times and many of the Salafis go back to them to seek Fatwa.
2. A person would teach the Madhab what he learnt. Hence, if there are several students who were in Riyadh, Madeenah and Makkah it is obvious that they would teach Hanbali books. Likewise, many of the scholars like Shaikh Mutlaq Al Jaasir and Shaikh Ahmad Quaimi and Shaikh Aamir Bhajat who offer online programs teach Hanbali Fiqh. So to muscle people into teaching or learning a system they don't know is entirely ridiculous.
3. In terms of Madhahib I believe that those who graduated from Darul Ulooms in the subcontinent NEED to be more tolerant. If one travels to Azhar Masjid all the Madhahib co-exist and that is because the teachers there have knowledge and understanding regarding Fiqh, its nuances and complexities.
4. The main issue is Aqeedah. Abu Haneefah, Shafiee, Malik, Ahmad, Bukhari, Muslim etc. were all upon one Aqeedah. They were neither Maaturidi or Ashari.
Are you implying they were of the wahhabi 3aqeedah
They were all on the Aqeeda of Ahl Sunnah which was the Aqeeda detailed and formulated by Imam Ash'ari. Imam Ash'ari lived later than them. But his and Imam Maturidi's explanation of Creed is that of Ahl Sunnah. These two contemporary Imams formulated the theology just like the four previous Imams formulated the 4 Fiqhi Madhabib.
There is no such thing as Wahhabi Aqeedah. Secondly, the books of the Salaf especially that of Imam Al Laalakaaee where he documented the creed of Imam Al Bukhari, Ali Ibn Madeeni, Sufyaan Ath Thawri, Abu Haatim At Raazi clearly documents the 'Aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah. And it does not entail philosophy or Kalaam. I recommend that you read those books in sha Allah.
@@drmauroof I'm not convinced imposing a theology or 'aqeeda' by Imam Ashari is in the best interests of Muslims today. You only have to read the 'Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology' to see how confusing and conflicting the ideas prevelant were in those academic circles over 1000 years ago. As a simple example, is the Qur'aan eternal or created ? Just how does Imam Ibn Hanbli's position become 'correct'? There is no nass to believe in either sides arguemant. No Muslim will be asked about this on the Day of Judgement.
@@MusaMills1
No matter what spin you put on it using names of the actual Salaf that you have no chain/connection to through scholarly transmission isn’t going to help you. Let’s call a spade a spade, yes wahhabi aqeedah
@58:21 The book mentioned is 'Durra al-Bahiyya' - This is also available in English titled 'Comprehensive-Islamic-Jurisprudence-Sh.-Muhammad-ash-Shawkani-(around 815+ pages); published in Malaysia ...available also in UK through Darus Salaam Books, London Central Mosque). I can provide the soft copies if anyone is interested...
Can u provide me with soft copy. JAZAK ALLAH
Yes please, it would be great
@@niyasusman2657 Give me an email to send you to.
I am also interested brother
Could you pls. provide me with a soft copy too, jzk
I can feel genuine anger in his voice and it's perfectly justified. masha Allah
Brother new to the channel. I love u for the sake of Allah. You are what the ummah needs. Peace
May Allah increase you in baraka. Amazing, timely, relevant talk which we all need to listen to. Jazaakallahu khairan dear Sheikh
The great scholars of haheeth never never ever made chapter headings to make their books into books of Fiqh. It was clearly only to make it easy to organise the many hadeeth. Imam Abu Zur’ah at-Raazi said I sat with Ahmed ibn Hanbal and would mention to him a chapter then he would start mentioning all the narrations with their chains for that chapter. The books of Fiqh were set up to put all the thousands of Fiqh issues into organised chapters. Their sentences summarised all the proofs such as verses and many hadeeth and narrations of the Sahaaba and Taabieen and so on.
Subhanallah this was such a great lecture. I have encountered a lot of the Salafi - non madhabis in the last decade and this is the best discourse I have listened to yet. Mat Allah reward you all.
Alhamdulilah Shaykh, thank you so much for this lecture.
They say "lets follow quran and sunnah" so are they saying the 4 Imams didnt follow the sunnah?
The pseudo-salafis speak in double talk and hide whats inside their chests.
Nobody who is a salafi says this.
What the salafis say is that the those from hindu lands such as the pakistanis and indians, and those from the christian lands, such as the bosnians,albanians, and turks, those from the levant and egypt have chosen to align their deen to be closer to hindusim and christianity with the constant grave worship, amulet worship, birthday worship, major and minor shirk, and so on, that is far away from the 4 imams and Islam. That is what the salafis criticize. We do not care if you choose not to perform raf al yadayn or something like that.
Most of the strong hadiths were only compiled after the 4 imams came into existence. One can follow Quran and sunnah blindly but one cannot follow imams blindly. If the imams verdict contradicts the Quran or the Hadith you cannot follow the imam. That is like shirk . According to Hanafi madhab one is not allowed to eat prawns but there’s nowhere in the Quran or any reliable hadith where prawns are forbidden to eat. So are you gonna follow hanafi or quran?
@@sbslm1They definitely didn't follow shaykh ibn taymiyyahs, albani, bin baz and uthaymeens Madhab. That's a stupid questions. As the imams were after that time That's like me saying did the khulafa follow hadith or shahih Al Bukhari. The four imams followed the understanding of different shahaba and the shahaba followed the Qur'an and sunnah.
@@4ozking858you forgot to mention the Arab lands where the salafis do shirk by blind following their skaykhs which is also shirk. They choice shahi albukhari over hadith and sunnah. They look past their shaykhs mistakes which are against the hadith or sunnah which is also shirk. They are following there shaykh over Allah. Such as letting American troops have a base in Saudi Arabia when it is clear in the hadith no non Muslims can be in the Arabian peninsula.
It is not permissible for any of them (the kuffaar) to live in the Hijaaz. This is the view of Maalik and al-Shaafa’i, but Maalik said: I think that they should be expelled from all the Arab lands, because the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Two religions cannot coexist in the Arabian Peninsula.” Abu Dawood narrated with his isnaad from ‘Umar that he heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “I will certainly expel the Jews and the Christians from the Arabian Peninsula,, and I will not leave anyone there but Muslims.” Al-Tirmidhi said: this is a saheeh hasan hadeeth. And it was narrated that Ibn ‘Abbaas said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) left behind three instructions. He said: Expel the mushrikeen from the Arabian Peninsula, honour the delegations the way that I do, and he kept quiet about the third. Narrated by Abu Dawood.
Al-Mughni, 9/285, 286.
@@imtiazlatif4948I don't know where you have learnt your knowledge from but your information is incorrect. Strong hadith were written at the time of the shahaba and not after the times of the four imams. Also the hanafi opinion is different from that of imam Abu hanifa. The imam believed prawns were not fish and his students believed they were fish.
Translation: A fish is that creature which has a backbone, lives in water, swims with its fins and breathes through its gills.
Prawns do not come under the category of fish, because they do not have a backbone nor do they breathe through gills. So they fall under the category of insects, and would not be allowed.
Eating Insects:
It is not permissible in the Shafi’i school to eat insects (such as ants, bees, flies, beetles, roaches, worms). This is because insects are considered distasteful, and permissibility has been tied to what is good, and impermissibility to what is distasteful. This is derived from the Qur’an (7:157), in describing the Messenger “who makes good things permissible for them and bad things impermissible.”
I would love to write more to disprove your baseless claims. You can research the false claims you have yourself as the correct information is there.
Mash'Allah this is one of the best lectures I've heard on madhabs. ❤❤❤
Salafi dawah is big on the internet which is why people who don't have first hand access to religious people, keep getting knowledge from sources that have dwindled from the tradition, salafism has caused a lot of damage, Nevertheless Alhamdulillah, Allah swt is Al Hadi, whomsoever he guides none can lead astray and whomsoever he leads astray none can guide
Subhan Allah thanks to allah s.w.t that we have scholars of islam
This is so timely. May Allah reward all the shaykhs and everyone who made this happen
When a Scholar A speaks on an issue give evidence...and Scholar B speaks on the same issue but does not give evidence, who do we follow? For the one who can read, listen, understand, has intelligent the follows Scholar A.
Rightly said, but even the educated Hanafi jurists /mufties are blind followers.
The renowned Pakistani Mufti Taqi Usmani says in ‘Taqleed Ki Share’e Haisiyyat’:
For a muqallid, his imam’s fatwa is sufficient. He has no need of looking into Quraan and Sunnah for daleel (evidence). Having said that, if there occurs an issue whereby the muqallid finds a hadith which goes against the ruling and opinion of his imam, its necessary for him to have faith that he has not understood the hadith. If he leaves the ruling of his imam and takes the hadith of the messenger then he will go astray. Taqleed Ki Sharee Haisiyat . Urdu copy page 87- Mufti Taqi Usmani
They still follow the guidelines which were laid down about 1100 years ago.
'' usooli hanafi scholar Karkhee ''
“The ayah of the Quraan that opposes the statement of our ashaab (ie the Hanafee scholars) should be considered to be figuratively explained or it should be understood to be abrogated. Similarly any ahadeeth that contradicts and opposes the statement of our ashaab it will also be figuratively explained or understood to be abrogated.” (ar-Risaalah Fee Usool al-Hanafiyyah pg.169-170 and also commonly known as Usool Karkhee).
May Allah bless the two noble scholars and increase them in taqwa and ikhlaas
IBN MASOOD RA STATED IN HIS TIME"" TODAY WE LIVE IN A TIME WHEN THE SCHOLARS ARE MORE AND SPEAKERS ARE LESS, THERE WILL COME A TIME WHEN SCHOLARS ARE LESS AND SPEAKERS ARE MORE"'
SO BEWARE MY DEAR BROTHERS.
Lol the madhkalis part was funny
Mufti Sahib thought process behind his words is what i enjoy the most and then his explanation of details. It’s important as a viewer to understand the thought process behind these lectures rather than jump on this whole bidah and haram diagnoses.
Mufti Sahab is wrong and even spreading lies.
Since when anyone from the Sahaba, Tabiyeen and Atba Tabiyeen used aqal before Deen? This "thought process" (philosophy) or using rationale before authentic Ahadith is what none of the earliest generations did.
Ali Radiallahu Anhu even spoke against it in an authentic Hadith when he talked about how Islam does not always go by logic as he saw Prophet Muhammad sal Allahu Alihi Wa Salam....
Abd Khayr reported: Ali ibn Abi Talib, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “If the religion were based upon one’s opinion, one might expect the bottom of the leather sock to be wiped instead of the top. I have seen the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, wiping over the upper part of his leather socks.”
Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 162
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
@@salikidrees2968He never ever mentioned using philosophy over the Sahih Ahadith. I can bet you did not watch the whole video.
What He is saying is that even the Salaf differed in various. Yani even the Salaf had ikhtilaf on some issues. Who are we to believe that just “following the Quran and Sunnah” is enough? Even the modern day don’t just use Quran and Sunnah, they use the views and interpretation of Al-Albani and Ibn Uthaymeen and Bin Baz.
So once again, even the Salaf had ikhtilaf because the Prophet (pbuh) accepted these differences. And Hadith are not on the level of the Quran. According to Hanafi fiqh for example, we use Quran, Sunnah, Ijma, Qiyas (logic and aql), Istihsan (personal opinion) and Customs (‘urf). If there is no answer in the Quran and Sunnah, using Logic and Aql becomes necessary.
@@salikidrees2968 Albani was hanafi and so was father RA but he strayed away from it. As Mutf sb said, if you wanna follow S Albani then feel free to do so.
@raystar800 father who? Again did Sheykh Albani Raheema hu Allah prayed according to Imam Abu Hanifa or did he pray according to Rasool Allah ﷺ?
Are Muslims to follow Prophet Muhammad ﷺ "blindly" or someone else?
Sheykh Albani wrote a book on Prayer with references from authentic Ahadith. Alhamdulillah.
Do you pray like Mufti or do you pray the way Prophet Muhammad ﷺ prayed and told us?
@@salikidrees2968 he followed hanafi fiqhs interpretation of Quran and sunnah then strayed away to create his own school of thought.
Alhamdulillah for our ulama e haq like this Dr Mufti❤❤❤
The deobandis who think about donkeys in their salah
Wa tu izzo man tashaa wa tuzzillu man tashaa!
May Allah guide the Shias, pseudo salafis and ahlul bidaah to the siraate mustaqeem of the Ahle sunnah waljamaah! Ameen.
@@dhiaulhaq5958 may Allah guide the deobandis, especially the ones who think of donkeys in salah and the ones who think Allah has the possibility to lie. Ameen
@@AhleSunnah586 The curse of Allah be upon the liars.
May Allah open the doors of hidayah to the ahlul bidaah who openly SEEK madad from ghairullah although in salah they recite IYYAKA NAABODU WA IYYAKA NASTAEEN!
@dhiaulhaq5958 if its a lie why do deobandi scholars like limbada and adam al kawtheri back the statements. Stop blind following.
Brothers of ZamZamAcademy I wanted to request if you've got Turkish translation to the similar topic lecture as this is a Strong movement that we've seen targeting our Turkish brothers who unfortunately don't have a similar answers or defense to the questions...
Many of them are just European language speaker or Turkish speakers ... Very weak in English
You have local scholars in Istanbul and elsewhere who are Hanafi and Shafi'. Very easy to request them to speak on these topics.
@@taimur526 there are already the ones that speak on such topics. The actual problem is that people nowadays in Turkey have A LOT OF Kibr(arrogance) They don't want to listen to any Hoca (teacher/scholar) They see them as backwards. Some even reject hadith and Quranist. Some say Allah gave me brain, I read and understand Quran, some mixing things with science. A lot of crazy things going on, so due to such arrogance, they don't listen and hate such scholars. Turkey is messed up BIG time unfortunately. May Allah guide us all
@@ac-go4np wow
@@ac-go4npthis is happening in subcontinent too not just turkey ...that's why many of youth are entering wahabism modern narrow thinking
Spoke to a salafi brother just yesterday and he said he does not follow a madhab at all.
I simply said to him, either you are qualified to derive rulings yourself and effectively make your own madhab or you go to someone to ask questions and therefore you are following their madhab.
That’s not how it works.
@@monkmodemalik8225 how does it work then?
@@rahilhabib He may have meant that he does not follow any of the 4 major madhabs. His rulings will still need to be derived from scholars who are qualified to give rulings. Salafia is wholly misrepresented. All of Sunni Islam is upon Salafia, if one sect is not then it cannot be Sunni Islam. later additions from later scholars are just that, additions. We leave it to the scholars of Ah lul Sunnah to determine whether they are beneficial or not but the Islam we follow today is the Islam that is derived from the first 3 generations and the prophet (saw) with evidences.
@@rahilhabibso you follow Imams of ray? Astagfirallah
@@azizurrahman116 my point is that when you ask a scholar for a ruling (because we laymen aren't qualified to derive rulings ourselves) we rely on them for the ruling and trust in them for that. That is the same thing 'blind following'. The difference is that the salafi madhab is a contemporary madhab while the 4 mainstream madhab have gone through over 1,000 years of scholarship.
Dear mufti mengera this talk about salafi is a very good talk
سبحان الله
Another good example of why we shouldn't just see "Dr" or "mufti" in the titles and follow the person.
May Allah guide everyone who is sincere. آمين
@58:21 The book mentioned is 'Durra al-Bahiyya' - This is translated in Urdu with the title ' Fiqh al-Hadith' in two volumes (around 1570+ pages); published in Pakistan by Nomani Kutubkhana...I can provide the soft copies if anyone is interested...It is the time to unite now...
Yes.. Time to unite the way likes of Imam shawkani Rahimahullah called upon... He was a fierce oppnent of taqleed... Also wrote a beautiful treatise on it.. I forget the name
Would be interested please.
Another big Problem we Salafis have is that we prefer and push the judgements on many Hadeeth of Shaikh al-Albaani above the classical Hadeeth scholars like Imam Hafiz ibn Hajr al-Asqalaani, Zayla'ee, Qatloobah, al-Iraaqi, ibn Abdul-Barr, al-Bayhaqi, Imam an-Nawawi, ........ so if these scholars say Saheeh or Hasan we prefer Shaikh al-Albaani who might say Daeef instead, common practice this. Not to forget they were Huffaaz with the chains of many hadeeth books, hence they were termed as Haafiz. Shaikh al-Albaani was a researcher on Hadeeth, not a great Haafiz like we had before, they combined their massive Hifz and research together.
We Salafis even differ on many issues of Bidah like using the Tasbeeh beads, Fowzaan and Uthaimeen say's its ok, al-Albaani and ibn Baaz say it's Bidah.
You’re not a salafi and neither have you ever been a salafi. Fear Allah and stop lying just to score points.
Please show me where it says Shaykh Al-Fawzaan and Shaykh Uthaymeen differed with others on using tasbeeh? The classical scholars you name dropped we teach their books more fervently in our universities and madrasah, maybe when you go umrah or hajj sit in the duroos at masjid an nabawi and masjid Al haram and benefit from them. They are far more learned in the books of these scholars than a senior deobandi scholar like taqi usmani. The only scholars your people quote are the khandalvis, palanpuris and the odd classical scholar here and there, the names that are popular in your circles are ibn arabi and Al-ghazali 😂 I wonder why….
Brother... More you shoot blanks more it looks like you have an agenda🤣
Don't stop with imam bayhaqi... Go much into past.. Imam daarqutnee.. Imam Bukhari.. Imam daarmi... Imam ahmad.. Well...
You will be surprised to learn that how badly these imams criticised blind following and especially ahnaf for rejecting ahaadees.... You are not sincere
@@FazsterHQ He is either lying or he is just mighty confused...
You have no idea... Looks like you are just dropping names...
We salafis don't follow imam albani blindly.. And the idea you are trying to push through saying that imam albani came with something new than these imams is your ignorance.
You mentioned IMAM ABDL BARR.. He was a salafi in aqeeda.. A maliki by learning but not a blind follower. Have u read his work? He has refuted blind following of madhabs very much...sheikh Albani just walked the way of these pious imams..thats all...as for difference in furoo issues see how badly deobandis differ among themselves..they can't even unite on a simple issue like EATING PRAWNS BEING ALLOWED OR PROHIBITED..According to some of them hanafis are not allowed to eat it but they can trade in it as it is halal for shafis🤣.thats the kind of blind following salafi manhaj opposes...as for few furoo issues, different opinions are no problem until there is proof both ways..Please don't push your ignorance and biased views on others... Fear Allah
10:45 - Imam Nawawi, Imam Tahawi, Fakhar ad Din Razi, Ibn Rajab Hanbali, Ibn Hajar Asqalani, Imam Dhahabi, Ibn Kathir, ibn Al Jawzi, Imam Suyuti, ibn Jarir at Tabari etc.
I don’t know any salafi brother read a hadith or verse and interpret it himself. When it comes to fiqh and understanding of fiqh and how to apply it in our daily lives, we all follow certain scholars.
This is a misrepresentation of salafiya to claim that the salafis without adequate knowledge just interpret religious texts on themselves.
So you follow a madhab of a scholar
I know many lay salafis that go direct to the text.
SubhanAllah Amazing lecture, I was a salafi and it took months of slowly breaking away from it which happened very recently, and many of them are so staunch that just a few days age, lay followers who just began studying- passing idiotic fatwas like it is nothing, one of them said that an athari women cannot marry from a athari or mattaduri.
Can i buy this book i am living in Finland, can you sent me this book o
Whitethreadpress.com
the best way to look at every madhab is i am right but i could be wrong and you and wrong but you could be right
السَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ ٱللَّهِ وَبَرَكاتُهُ
•Brothers and sisters this brothers spoke in a respectful manner linguistically but in reality they were misleading the way how they presented Salafiyah.
•The Salafi scholars are not against following a Madhhab but they are against blindly and fanatically following a Madhhab even after the truth has became clear to you.
•The end goal of the muslim should be to come to the sunnah not to come to the Madhhab. The madhhab is only a tool we can use to come to the truth.
•Practically the Salafi scholars say that for a layman is permissible to follow a Madhhab but not obligatory, following a Madhhab is the best way to learn in the beginning the rulings of fiqh, but we should not be fanatical about the Madhhab and stick to it even after we see that the truth is somewhere else.
•Salafi scholars did a hard work to unite the Muslims in the correct Aqeedah and to come back to Tawheed. This brothers spoke all the time about fiqh issues as if that is the only thing that salafi scholars have called Muslims to come back to quran and sunnah. The most important thing is to come back to correct Aqeedah which they didn’t even mention one time.
•There is so many mistakes and flaws they mention that is to long to list them here but everyone should try and check for them self the points they mention and see if everything is how they presented it. .
•The madhhab of Abu Hanifah (may Allah have mercy on him) is the most widespread madhhab among the Muslims, and perhaps one of the reasons for that is that the Ottoman caliphs followed this madhhab and they ruled the Muslim lands for more than six centuries. That does not mean that the madhhab of Abu Hanifah is the most sound madhhab or that every ijtihad in it is correct, rather like other madhhabs, it contains some things that are correct and some that are incorrect. What the believer must do is to follow the truth and what is correct, regardless of who says it.”
•The salafi scholars are not against laymen following a madhhab but more against scholars being blind to their madhhab and fanatically following it even though the other madhhab has stronger proof.
•Shaykh ‘Abd al-Kareemal-Khudayr
There is nothing wrong with learning fiqh according to one of the four madhhabs, on condition that one follows the daleel (evidence) if it becomes apparent that the madhhab says something contrary to the daleel on a given matter, because obedience to Allaah and His Messenger comes before obedience to anyone else. It is also essential to have good manners towards other schools of thought and not to develop sectarian attitudes in opposing them. He should make the truth his aim and respect the opinions and efforts (ijtihaad) of the scholars. He should make discussing matters with them in a polite manner his method of reaching the truth, and he should advise people in a polite way if he thinks that they are mistaken.
It is wrong for a person who is able to learn to refuse to do so on the grounds that only the scholars are able to understand the daleel. We do not say to one who is unable to engage in ijtihaad that he has to strive to derive rulings from the texts when he does not have the ability to do that and does not understand the principles; otherwise chaos would reign. But we do say that if you have some knowledge and understanding, you should at least know what the proof and daleel of your imaam (whom you are following) is, so that you can see the connection with the Qur’aan and Sunnah, and you can follow with some measure of insight and not be merely a bind follower.
•May Allah guide us all to the correct practice of islam according to the understanding of the Righteous predecessors.
Brother regarding madhabs u need more research cuz ur facts are mostly incorrect ...jazakumullah ❤
Agreed
@@dianacruze1825 May Allah reward you for your suggestion. I will do more research in Sha Allah to always learn more. Can you tell me what is incorrect from what i said so it will make it easier my research? 🙂
In which country SHeikh is delivering the talk? Thank you
England
Masha’allah, just a quick statement: A person who follows the Quran and Sunnah isn’t a salafi, they’re just a Muslim.
In the school of Ahle sunnah waljamaah the rulings (sharia) are derived from:
Primary sources
1.Quraan and sunnah
2. Rulings of the Khulafa e Rashidin (Abu Bakr, Umat Al Khattab, Usmaan Ibne Affan and Ali ibne Abi Taalib Radhiallahu anhum.
Secondary sources
1.. Qiyas (analogy)
2. Ijmaa ( consensus) of opinions of the imams of fiqh
Wallahu aalam
everyone claims they follow the quran & sunnah even Shia do...A salafi is the one who follow the Quran & Sunnah WITH the understanding of the Salaf (1st 3 generation)
@@AM-5d The real salafis my brother are the Ahle Sunnah wal jamaah.
We RESPECT and FOLLOW the rulings of the Khulafa e Rashidin in ALL matters including 20 rakaah of terawih, 3 talaqs if given in one go counts as three etc. We do not pick and choose.
The pseudo salafis while CLAIMING to follow the first 3 generations , disregard the rulings of the Khulafa e Rashidin. May Allah open their hearts to the haq. Ameen!
@@dhiaulhaq5958 Salafi are ahlus Sunnah/Hadith/Athar... Our disagreement isn't merely fiqhi position but is regarding 'Aqeedah...Where do the Asharis & Maturidis drive their 'aqeedah ?
@@AM-5d 1.Qulhuwallahu ahad. Allahussamad. Lam yalid walam yoolad.
Walam yakullahu kuffowan ahad.
2.Ashhadu alla ilaha illallah wa ashhadu Anna Muhammadan abdoho wa Rasuluh
May Allah grant everyone to jannah
No Imam or Shaykh ever blindly follwed a Madhab. Not even the Sahabah. Not even Sufiyan at Tawri, Ibn Uwayna, Abu Hanifa, Shafi, Malik, Ahmad, Ibn Maeen, Ibn Mubarak, Sooyouti, Barbahari. Bukhari, Muslim, Thirmidhi and so on never blindly followed a madhab...they did ittiba...As for authenticity of isnad then thats for the Muhadditoon. All imams said follow the hadeeth dont follow opinions blindly. Unless theres no evidence, so follow the opinion one is comfortable with. As long as hadeeth is saheeh, we are to follow. Unless there is a conflict in it's authentication amongst the Muhadditoon. Yes, We need madhab, we need to study them, but hadeeth is our priority. Opinions that have no evidence are baseless .
Fascinating and insightful! Consider doing similar for the schools of creed
Shaikh Sultan al-Eid in Riyadh mentioned that be aware as Imam Abu Haneefah RH is like a door and gate to attack the rest and entire of the Fiqh as a whole, if he is attacked then it will open the door to attack the other 3 Madhab Imams then after that the rest of the classical scholars.
Imam Abu Haneefah was Salafi in aqeedah do you follow the same aqeedah as him?
No he wasn't a salafi in aqeedah any salafi beliefs ascribed to him are fabricated or misinterpretations don't say incorrect things
@@husamzaheer5415 have you read his books?
Beautiful sheikh with sunna face always smiling like Prophet aleihi salaam
Scholars said if Imam Syafie lived after 60, his madzhab will dominates the world.
Madhab is a consistent system that you have to take it in entirety, because everything depends on each other, you can't pick up whatever you want as long it suits you, the closest analogy of Madhab is a law of a country, you can't take some laws and discard the rest, or create a combination from each country, the result is a system of laws that err with contradictions and discord. Madhab in Islam isn't about follow your opinion, but it follows a methodology that derived from Quran, Hadith, Consensus, and Analogical reasoning according to the jurisprudence principles of this Madhab. My suggest is to read a book about the history of the Islamic jurisprudence, and you will understand the reason behind their existence. The modern non-madhab is a state-manufactured by Suadi Arabia, and right now their funds is drying up, means that this non-madhab is fading. The four major madhab of Islam aren't manufactured by any state, but they originated by the efforts of independent Muslims scholars.
That’s not true at all. You must stay consistent on a madhhab on one subject, like a business contract (unless you simply follow a scholar who goes with evidence and not a madhhab itself).
But there are MANY situations in which it is perfectly fine to go outside of one’s madhhab.
Like, if you follow the Shafi’i madhhab on financial matters why would you have to follow it when it comes to touching your wife and wudu, when the Shafi’i position is clearly weak and has nothing to do with finances?
JazakAllah Mufti, we Appreciate your amazing and logical responses to Ghair muqallideen. May Allah guide us in straight path.
Asw finally listening to sense,unity amongst the Ummah,even if we follow different schools of thought our Nabi saw in his last sermon said all muslims constitute a brother hood.
Did he say all different sects constitute "brother hood". If you say "yes" then either your are truthful and Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu Alihi Wa Salam lied (in the Hadith of 73 sects and about those who do biddah) or you are speaking of something you do not know and thus might be misguiding others. So one should not speak without knowledge. Lying upon Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu alihi Wasalam has grave consequences. Read the Ahadith about one who lies upon Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu Alihi Wa Salam.
The deobandis who think about donkeys in their salah
Muslims Following different groups doesn't bother me as long as they get along with one another & not committing shirk by calling up on the dead saints for help instead of Allah.
Shaykh Isma'il As-Salafi quoted in his book "Hujjiyat Hadith" Imam Ibnul Qayim saying in his "Sawa'iq Al- Mursalah": "Everybody knows that the Ahlul Hadith are the most truthful of all groups as said by Imam Ibn Al-Mubarak: “I found the religion to the Ahlul Hadith, the Kalam to the Mutazilah, the lies to the Rawafid and the tricks (Hyal) with Ahlur-Ray(people of opinion). """
HOW TRUE!!!!!!!
The Ahlul Hadeeth of the early Salaf my brother is what is meant here, be careful. This used to confuse me too, same issues I had
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble I know.. Yes... That's what we follow.. The early salaf... Also you should know that ahlulhadees of that time vehemently opposed ahlul rai(people of opinions) who were mostly ahnaaf at that time.
Alhamdulillah, salafis follow the early ahlul hadees in their aqeeda.. Fiqhi approach and sulook(purification of the soul). Exactly why I keep challenging you to pik up few books from imams of salaf and read to know who are in their footsteps...
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble If you think current day Ahlul Hadith have deviated from original Ahlul Hadith, then think about how much more Ahnaf are deviated from original Ahnaf! Arguments goes both ways!
i like the accent of the gentleman at 54:15. very clear, well spoken english
How do I contact him with family matters, what is the email address
the problem with the blind followers of madhabs is that they don't accept a hadith if it differs with their madhab. For example, hanafis refuse to raise their hands coming up from rukoo ( رفع اليدين), no matter how many saheeh hadith report this.
even if they choose not to raise their hands and do Rafayadhayn despite the saheeh ahadeeth, their Salah is still valid however I don't get those who say doing Rafayadhayn is 'Bid'ah' or that it is wrong etc... Even Imam Abu Hanifa (rahimahullah) said that if there is a more authentic narration and mine contradicts it, follow the authentic one
I might be wrong but I believe within the Hanafi and Maliki Madhabs, the reason they don't follow hadith is because they preferred to follow the actions of the sahabah from that area. Maliki - Madinah and Hanafi - Kufa. There are reasons why? If you study you'll see it's not that black and white as made out to be.
He's a deobandi who studied in Darul Uloom Bury. He takes knowledge from the likes of Ashraf ‘Ali Thanawi and Ilyas Kandhlawi.
That's why he is classified as Ahle sunnah waljamaah Alhamdulillah!
@@sarmad85 who classified him as that?
@@tanzimahmed8645learn wat is traditional Sunni Islam...they have sanad that goes back to the prophet
@@tanzimahmed8645don't need your judgement
I love the title of this video, Alhamdulillah! Sounds interesting.
I am a Muslim and have learned the last 10 years with and from Salafis, directly after my conversion. It has done me very well, I live in Egypt, learned proper Arabic, memorized a lot and have been doing dawah in my homeland with them.
Masha Allah. La Quwwata illa billah.
Have profited so much
Alhamdulillah.... Same here.. Iam from India... Alhamdulillah for salafi manhaj
Masha Allah
But all the above can be done without the Salafi Manhaj too
@@faizahmed8076 Stay strong my brother... BaarakAllaahu feek.
Same here. Nobody compares to the salafis in terms of their adherence to the sunnah, enjoining the good and forbidding the evil. Teaching and encouraging the learning of the Arabic language so Islam can be accessible to all.
@@4ozking858 Emphasis on learning arabic is also bcoz the truth should be accessible to all... As books written by salafussaliheen are in arabic😊. Stay blessed my brother..
May Allah grant patience to the ghurba of this ummah.
Masha'Allah what a fruitful sitting from both Mufti Abdul Rahman and the Hanbali Shaykh Jazak'Allah .
after wasting 20 years with barelwi and deobandis I embraced salafia alhamdulillah
Good for you brother... BaarakAllaahu feek!
Alhamdulilah
I know you're being dishonest in your comment. Stop playing fast and loose with Islam. You will have to answer for it one day.
Alhamdulillah ❤
Alhamdulillah.
Additionally I oppose the understanding that Hanbali Fiqh is hard to access:
1. There are MANY students in the UK who graduated from Qaseem, Madeenah and Riyaadh. Also those who graduated from online programs from the likes of Shaikh Quaimi, Aamir Bhajhat and Mutlaq Al Jaasir.
2. Many of the main texts are translated now. Daleel Ut Talib, Akhsar Mukhtasaraat, Umdah Ut Taalib, Zaad Ul Mustaqni', Umdah Al Fiqh are all translated. And there is the commentary of Zaad Ul Mustaqni' and also Mulakkhas Al Fiqhi which is based on Zaad Al Mustaqni.
3. No Madhab is easy to access via the texts in and of themselves. They have to be studied under a Shaikh or an Ustaadh who has precision in the said book.
I think they mean in general localities. It’s ideal that you have a scholar local to you that can help answer questions
Brother do you happen to know where to access the online courses of the hanbali scholars you mentioned?
@@MH-ng3bs Check مطلق الجاسر also عامر بهجت also القعيمي.
@@MusaMills1 May Allah reward you brother and accept from you this blessed day.
Our primary difference with Deobandis, Sufis and the likes is not that of Fiqh. It is one of the common tactics used by Deobandis to discredit the Salafiyyah by portraying it as a ghair madhhabi movement, which is completely false.
Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan, hafidhahullaah, said:
“The issue of sticking to a madhhab has in it some detail. If a person has the ability to know the ruling from its proof, and to deduce the ruling from its proof, then it is not permitted for him to cling to a madhhab. rather, it is upon him to take the ruling from the evidence if he has the ability to do so. However, this is rare amongst the people, since this is a quality of the mujtahideen from the people of knowledge; those that have reaced the levels of ijtihaad. As for one who is not like that, then he cannot take the rulings directly from the evidences. And this is the predominant case amongst the people, especially in these latter times. So [in such a case] there is no harm in adopting one of the four madhhabs and making taqleed of one of them. However, he should not make blindtaqleed such that he takes all that is in the madhhab; whether it is correct or incorrect. Rather, it is upon him to take from the madhhab that which - in his view - does not clearly oppose the evidence. As for those views in themadhhab which clearly oppose the evidence, then it is not permissible for the Muslim to take it. Rather it is upon him to adopt what is established by the proof, even if it is in another madhhab. So his leaving the madhhab for another madhhab in order to follow the evidence is something good; this is a matter which is good - rather it is obligatory; since following the evidence is an obligation.”
_____
Our main difference with Deobandis and the likes is on Aqeedah and Manhaj. Deobandis follow Maturidi aqeedah, which is an innovated aqeedah, contrary to the teachings of the salaf.
We don't tolerate the deviants and murtadeen like Ibn Arabi, who invented the Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood (blatant shirk), unlike Deobandis who praise and give justifications for his kufri writings.
We don't sit with Ahlul Biddah and nor do we tolerate any practice that is not authentically proven from Rasool Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم.
Salafiyyah is called Salafiyyah because we follow the way of the Salaf.
Spot on! Barakallah feek akhi
Alhamdulillah.... Well said.
Where is your sanad
Please stop being foolish, the hanfi/devbandi don't teach wahdat al wajood ",
Knowledge as Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim Rahimahullah stated is;
'Knowledge is what Allaah and His Messenger said. (Knowledge is also) what the Companions said, void of any concealment or disguise...
Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim also said;
Knowledge is: to know the guidance based upon its proofs...blind following is not equal to this in any way'
The problem is a lack of education in Islamic matters. I wonder how things would have been if we had united on Quranic Arabic as our lingua franca. From there it would have been easy to gain an understanding in Islam as this would be a standard for everyone. From an early age, knowing Fohsa would elevate our status spiritually and in worldly affairs (Quranic Arabic is amazingly logical). We would be a huge step closer to understanding our deen and thus these Satanic attitudes would not be able to touch us.
This video is a lie and sitting up hate.
I've been Salafi for almost 30 years and we have never been taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught (from imam Abu hanifa, imam Malik, imam Ahmed, and imam Shafi's words), that we must not be fanatical about the scholar / imam we learn from.
@@headfones1000 It's not a lie, you're just not as hardcore a Salafi.
@@SonGoku-io7shNot hardcore? I say that deobandi Islam understands Allaahs asmat wa sifat in an innovated manner, like the ashari's. And they are sufi, although not as astray as the brewli sufis. This is why we can perform salaht behind them, but not behind open brewlis. And I say that their version of hanafi fique is not fully representative of imam Abu hanifas madhab. Rahimullaah.
And I say to the ignorant on this issue, thatI fall under the description of madkhali, although that lebal is nonsense for anyone. I hope that confirm I am so called hardcore.
** However, that doesn't change the fact the we are not taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught from the imams of old and present that we must not completely blindly follow a madhab when we reach a good age or level of understanding, nor be fanatical. .. And my 30 years includes traveling n meeting Salafis in many countries n Ulema too. And I say that this video is based upon a lie and stiring up hate.
May Allaah have mercy upon us all.
@@headfones1000 Brother you should not speak out of ignorance. Of course I make excuses for you to say you are ignorant rather than lying on purpose, as you accused this video of doing.
I mean you are a self professed Madkhali yet you are trying to convey your group as so softly spoken and never having done any wrong. To call you a liar would indeed be easy based on the behaviour of those which you follow. However I don't wish to personally attack you as I do not know your actions away from this comments section.
As for blind following, if you don't blind follow your "Sheikhs", what else do you do? That is one of the biggest contradictions in your Madkhali ideology because you have no clue what your Saudi Sheikhs rulings are based on. You don't even know what your pseudo-Sheikhs fatwas are based on, yet you do Taqlid of them and spit these fatwas out.
Your problem with this video is simple. It states the truth as everyone knows and the truth hurts. This video has more home truths than your Madkhali "Sheikhs" have spoken about in the last 20+ years. The Madkhalis are a corrupt organisation yet you are attempting to perform damage limitations for them, so they hold onto relevancy by the skin of their teeth and corrupt the Ummah to the best of their ability. May Allah protect us from the corruption of the Madakhila and other corruptors. To ask your opinion on sifaat of Allah is like asking for financial advise from a toddler.
@@SonGoku-io7sh You went along with what I said in my first comment, but you made the assumption that I'm not the type of Salafi that the speaker in this video refered to.
I then gave you detailed info to describe myself so that you realise I am what people erroneously describe as madkhaki.
Instead of you then accepting that the video is clearly wrong, you accuse me of lying, while at the same time admitting you don't know my character.
Do you even know what the erroneous label of madkhaki means?
And the ahlul ilm that we follow are in South Asia, Kuwait, Sudan, etheopia, Nigeria, yemen and many other places, NOT just Saudia. The fact that you refered to Saudi scholars demonstrates that you follow sterio types just like the speaker does in the video.
And I don't think you know what blind following means. It means obeying all Islamic teachings from someone (other than the Prophet, ﷺ), without knowing or hearing if its from Al kitaab wa sunnah... Yes a child can do this, or an adult in an emergency with time constraints can ask an Alim for a ruling and follow it without knowing what text. Ayat or hadith it's based upon. .. But that's the exception.
Shaykh Al Albani stated;
Therefore, it is not possible for any Muslim to independently understand the Book and the Sunnah. Rather one must seek aid in understanding them by returning to the understanding of the noble Companions, who took their understanding from the Prophet sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam; via his statements, his actions and his tacit approvals.
Thus, along with calling to the Book and the Sunnah, it is absolutely essential to attach to this the understanding and the practice of the Salafus-Saalih (the Pious Predecessors: the first three generations of Muslims whose excellence has been testified to in the above hadeeth); acting upon the preceding verses and hadeeth, which order clinging to the path of the Believers, which has been explained to be the path upon which the Prophet sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, his Companions and those who followed them in beliefs and actions, were upon.
Taken from al-Asaalah magazine (11/84-87)
: Al Albani said: Thus, the day the Muslims return to understanding their religion as the Companions of Allaah’s Messenger sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam understood it; and then act upon this purified Islaam in the correct manner, in all aspects of life, then that will be the day that the Muslims will rejoice at the help of Allaah and His victory.
Statement of Shaykh Al Albani in Al Asaalah Magazine
istiqaamah.net/the-foundation-of-the-islamic-awakening/
How do we know how the sahabah's followed and interpreted Quran and Sunnah, how has their understanding been passed down that when they came across this verse or this hadeeth, they understood it like this and they did this. Where is this written and which books. or should we just take a scholars word for it. How do scholars verify their own understanding. Example 'Pray as you have seen me pray', who saw the Prophet pray, The Sahabah, who saw the Sahaba pray, the ones that came after them. Both Imam Malik and Abu Hanifa came not that far after. Wouldn't their understanding and how they prayed be much closer. Are there any books to say that this is how the Sahaba prayed? How did scholars gain this knowledge that when they read a verse of the Quran or Hadeeth, whatever they immediately know this is what the sahabahs would've done. Not trying to disparage Shaykh Albani, love him and respect him. Just trying to understand...
@@MohammadAhmed-qk2bm Learn the Deen from it's sources and it's Scholars and Allah will teach you. Our Deen is based on evidence and isnad
Just from the shaykhs speaking style one can hear his intelligence
This video is a lie and he's deliberately setting up hate.
I've been Salafi for almost 30 years and we have never been taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught (from imam Abu hanifa, imam Malik, imam Ahmed, and imam Shafi's words), that we must not be fanatical about the scholar / imam we learn from.
40:40
Assalamu Alaikum, you suggest we read up on this, where do i begin? Still finding my way through all this.
Jazakallah Hu Khair
I gather this Shaykh came across a Salafi who is either new, ignorant or extreme. Just to correct Anti Salafis..Salafi dawah is a manhaj built upon principles from the Qur'an and ahadeeth as understood by the Salad as Salih in all issues..They give importance to adhering to the correct Aqeedah, methodology, understanding...they advocate following evidence. Following the Ulamah, madhab based on evidence and not taqleed. We all have intellect, reason. Generally we all can read and understand...if not so, then no doubt we will be doing taqleed and not ittiba.
To understand a madhab, you have to study it. If you think a madhab are just statements of Imams e.g. the Hanafi madhab is 'what Imam Abu Hanifa said' then this isn't what a madhab is. Please go study under a known scholar from that madhab. Every single person I've come across who doesn't follow a madhab, always says you shouldn't follow a madhab, you should follow Quran and Sunnah, or this is the corret ruling or what you're following is incorrect ruling. but when pressed further can't explain what a madhab is and what the methodology of each madhab is, examples of rulings from the madhab and then analysing and critiquing both the evidence and the methodology. It shows me 2 things
1) They make statements without studying
2) Those who taught them also dont know.
I personally cannot say their ruling they are following is correct or incorrect. If you are going to go around imposing fiqh rulings on others and speaking on behalf of Allah and His Messenger then please have the knowledge to back it up. If you can't then how can you expect me to listen to you and how can I justify to Allah why I Iistened to you.
PS. I'm from the UK, here there are 2 groups of Salafis, I'm mainly referring to one particular group of them whose followers act like this.
Also if you want to understand a particular group, go spend some time with them, observe and listen their most well known scholars and try to understand their point of view over a period of time on different topics, this should give a general view of them. It would be unfair of me to judge 'salafis' based on what a 'sufi', 'deobandi' , 'barelvi' said. In the same way it would be unfair of me to judge others solely based on what 'salafis' say. If you want to stick to your 'group' only that's fine but don't impose this on others.
A salafi Scholar taught me one of the most important lessons of my life. Intention prior to attending a class or listening to scholar. Your intention should be of purely one of learning and understanding. Your intent should not be 'I'll use this to debate others, this gives me another point to argue on this issue. Let me catch some mistakes, let me find something to refute him on. It's quite clear in the comment section some comments have been made without listening to what was said.
When it comes to matters of the shariah everyone follows the scholar they trust, certain level of knowledge and understanding is required. But with everything else please think and reflect yourself as well. The scholars I follow taught me ignorance cannot be excused on the day of judgement and you cannot hide behind scholars on the day of judgement.
alhamdulillah a beneficial and eye opening talk
thank you sheikh ❤️❤️🇲🇾🇲🇾❤️❤️
To leave islam that which is based on the Quran and ahadeeth as understood by the Salaf as-Salih and the Ulamaj based in evidence is maturity, progress? To blind follow imams and Scholars is maturity and progress?
And hold firmly to the rope of Allah all together and do not become divided.
Salafis were never anti madhab, but anti taqleed of one individual scholar. Salafis follow all 4 madhahib. Our ‘aqeedah is also the same as the ‘aqeedah of the four imaams.
No
They put it under the guise of 'blind following' which most certainly applies to aqeedah aspects but not fiqh, which is where you follow a madhab.
Anyone can refute you easily. Care to show any Hadith of why a woman prayer is different than a man's prayer in Hanafi Fiqh? You will not find any. Instead you will know that the Sahabi women prayed just like men.
Do you have a Hadith that tells you that Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him forbade people from praying 1 rakah witr? You will not find any. Instead you will see that Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu alihi wa Salam himself prayed 1 witr. In Hanafi Fiqh, there is no 1 rakah witr.
So if you follow the above then you are a blind follower of Imam Abu Hanifa when you should be a blind follower of Prophet Muhammad pace be upon him. You really should study Islam and may Allah keep you adhering to the Quran and the Sunnah. Aameen.
Are you trying to refute me? If so, I'm no scholar and therefore I've not concluded any rulings about anything so there is nothing to refute there.
If you are saying to refute either madhab in general or the hanafi madhab specifically, then, again, I'm no scholar who has concluded any rulings so you should go and speak to an actual scholar about refutations.
@rahilhabib Your very statement that "blind following" applied most certainly to aqeedah "but not fiqh". Is what I am talking about.
Why would you say such a thing when you are not a scholar?
Is this what Allah says in the Quran? Or do you have a Hadith supporting your opinion?
Allah warns us to not speak without knowledge.
@@salikidrees2968 does الله not say in the Qur'an 'they believe as their forefathers believed'. This is in reference to their aqeedah where they refused to believe anything besides what their forefathers believed and taught them. The same apliies to one who says they are Muslim only because their parents are Muslim and therefore they are Muslim. No, you have to believe yourself individually.
Elsewhere in the Qur'an, الله says 'if you do not know then ask those who have knowledge' referring to rulings of Islam.
I am, of course paraphrasing from the English translation here.
@rahilhabib Yes Allah says this but what does it have to do with "blind following" "but not fiqh"?
I am not understanding if you are promoting this speaker or you are speaking against him or against Salafis?
This channel is soo beautiful. Mashallah
In Central Asia official state Hanafi religious departments are on their mission from the opposite direction, forcing people out of mosques for rasing hands, they can stop prayer half way for Ameen outloud, even sometimes call police to fine worshipers. Hanafi school has been here for ages and absorbed all traditions
😂 quite aggresive approach then.
We Muslims should unite on Quran and Sunnah.
I recommend actually watching the video
My dear brother. The Ummah was a lot more united before the issue got spread of trying to work out for ourself from the Quran and Sunnah directly. And before we had scholars with good intentions who started to call us to not stick to follow one of the 4 Fiqh Madhabs.
Also yes absolutely we should unite upon the Quran and Sunnah but what does that mean? 6000 verses of the Quran are simple and easy to understand and act upon for any Muslim, in fact millions of non-muslims have entered into Islaam just from reading the Quran as it’s easy, the vast majority is very easy. The rest of the 500 or so verses are more difficult somewhat and they are related usually to the matters of Fiqh. They need extraTafseer and explanation. Sometimes the explanations just for those 500 or so verses termed as Aayaatul Ah’kaam, they go into volumes by themselves. Each of the 4 Fiqh Madhabs have their Tafseer books just for these verses alone in volumes and sometimes they comment in extra detail on those verses whilst explaining the whole Qur'an. So we can and always did unite upon the Quran by busying ourselves with the 6000 verses and by letting the scholars explain the other 500 or so verses about the rulings/ah’kaam/halal and haram, ….
Then we can do the same with the Hadeeth/Sunnah. Thousands of them are authentic and only some of those are for Ah’kaam-Rulings that need more explanations. To top that those types of hadeeth a lot of times conflict each other apparently and this is only one of the various services that the 4 Fiqh Madhabs provided by writing books and explanaing in detail on hadeeth that seem to contradict each other. Like the different hadeeths about not when the Fajr time enters in but the time best for Fard Fajr Prayer to be prayed in Jama’ah. (In the eastern city of Ih’saa of Saudi Arabia if you miss in Jama’ah the Fajr or ASR then you can catch it in the Hanafi Masjids, they have 4 Fiqh Madhabs in that city, maybe this happens in Cairo also I’m guessing).
But point being, yes we can unite and usually did for 1300 years upon the Quran and Sunnah easily as the vast majority like 90% of the Quran are Sunnah don’t need Tafseer to get a good basic understanding and act upon them. Only in the last 100 years the calls to not learn or follow or give fatwa upon one of the 4 Madhabs has divided the Ummah very badly, it was a slip up and devils deception and we ask Allah to forgive the scholars who called to it and we do them a favor by clarifying their error so that they have less followers to follow their wrong way. They had good intentions but wrong is wrong and must be pointed out for the better of the UNITY of the Ummah which is a lot more important than some scholars. You can get Tafseer for the 6000 easier verses for extra benefits but it’s not needed to understand enough to act upon those texts. As for the remaining 10% then we unite easily simply by following one of the 4 Madhabs as a way to quickly understand those remaining texts of the Quran and Sunnah. We can't stop our daily lives for 10 years just to try and understand directly ourselves, rather we have scholars and these 4 Madhabs are just different ways to understand those texts. Many big top notch scholars attested that way who were alot bigger in levels too for 1000 years, so lets use some common sense. And not to forget, sometimes they all agree on many issues of Fiqh and sometimes they disagree because some issues of the Arabic grammar are differed over maybe. Sometimes over if a narrator in the chain of a hadeeth if he met that Sahaabi or not. Or if the narration speaking about the reasons why a verse was revealed or a why an important incident in a hadeeth in this issue is authentic or not, which can prove or disprove the actual wisdom behind the hadeeth or not. So 4 imams and their students and their students who became high level, developed systems to gather, analyse, deduce, reconcile between different narrations and so on. Hope u understand my dear brother.
Can any medical student study with one university some chapters and topics then some days go to a totally different university for other chapters and another university for the remaining? And they keep doing this for 4 years. Will they pass their degree? Will they even gain a real solid understanding or have major holes in their studies? Will it be even legal or accepted or looked upon as mad?
And just because we have very rare odd and biased or fanatical statements of very few of the scholars within the later scholars from the 4 Fiqh Madhabs doesn't mean we disregard them, those statements were rebuked and pointed out.
……..on the understanding of the salaf.
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble United? Like how? When for nearly six hundred years there were four musallas around the kaaba? That's unity what prophet left behind this ummah on?
In every century there were imams n scholars of repute who challenged the concept of blind following.... Educate yourself.
@@FazsterHQ Mashallah
Jewel of scholarship in laymen language
You probably remember that Southern California had a big salafi inclination. I moved away and then moved back 16 years later. I see salafis attending Mawlids now! We need you back shaykh, you were 20 years ahead of you’re time.
You people lie out of your teeth and don’t even feel ashamed in doing so.
And it is a merit how? Since when did attending Mawlid became the Yard Stick?
If people start falling of the cliff, you will think of it as a good thing?
Did Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu alihi Wa Salam and his companions, or Tabiyeen or Atba Tabiyeen ever celebrate Mawlid?
Do you even know who introduced it and when? If any Salafi start attending Mawlids then he is either ignorant or he has gone astray/deviated from the way of Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him and his companions. And we all know what happens to an astray sheep/goat. It either falls off the cliff or falls pray.
@@salikidrees2968what he wanted to convey is that, they are much more integrated with the wider sunni community.
If someone doesn't want to do a mawlid, which can be broadly categorized as a Halaqa of Zikr, if you remove all the terminologies, which has huge precedence for,
Then it's not a big issue at All, doing or not doing it is not from the Fard and waajibat.
@@salikidrees2968here we go again :(
@kledmohd4230 May Allah help you and grow you in the correct knowledge of Islam as practiced by Sahaba, Tabiyeen and Taba Tabiyeen and make you grow to learn the definition of biddah. Aameen.
There will come a time when Muslims will call alcohol with a different name. It does not change the fact that it is still alcohol.
Rasulullah PBUH already said, hold thight and bite the Sunnah and Quran. Never let go. And you will not disguided.
This is a very good talk about salafis
Abu Haneefa was a salafi because he was a tabi'een, not a hanafi as the mufti claims. I also wouldn't be so sure to say all those who claim to be followers of his madhhab are doing it correctly as he understood Islam.
So Imam Abu Hanifa was from the Salaf and he wasn't a Salafi
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said:
No one has to blindly follow any particular man in all that he enjoins or forbids or recommends, apart from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). The Muslims should always refer their questions to the Muslim scholars, following this one sometimes and that one sometimes. If the follower decides to follow the view of an imam with regard to a particular matter which he thinks is better for his religious commitment or is more correct etc, that is permissible according to the majority of Muslim scholars, and neither Abu Haneefah, Maalik, al-Shaafa'i or Ahmad said that this was forbidden.
Majmoo' al-Fataawa, 23/382.
Common sense, if I don't know about maths I'll ask a maths teacher, if I don't know about engineering I'll ask an engineer, etc Quran reinforces this just incase anyone is confused
But asking people who have memorised something isn't knowledge but the same as a data bank , they just process information from memory, dosent mean they're knowledgeable
Assalam o Alaykum
Alhamdulillah I have ordered mufti sb fiqh Al Imam .
Jazak Allah khair for explaining on the subject .
Can mufti sb team share name of Molana zakariya book please
When I click most of these ex salafis channels it has music and inappropriate content lol
I dont generally know who the sheikh mixes with. Yes he is right other than the madkhalis, all of the scholars who ascribe to what he calls ' Salafi ' follow the hanbali madhab and they teach and study books in the hanbali madhabs. Many of my teachers when they teach Hanbali they only stick to the madhab. On the contrary, is he trying to say that Hanafi's leave other people alone when they don't do things the way they do? I've been told my salah is invalid because I don't pray the Hanafi way. Anti Madhab is one extreme and the other extreme is also fanaticism to a madhab
Following madhab is taking an intermediary
We are supposed to be taught language and the meanings of words. So when we read Quran we get direct guidance from Allah through the pure ones who guard the arsh ( weltunshaung ) they guard and are the only ones who have access to the book (;your mind ) yes these are the angels of the arsh not the cartoon or Christian rendering of a Throne head gear or a kursi being a chair,👈 kursi indicates apparatus which is the physical could be your brain and body , Allah does not sit on a chair
Quran is a prophetless System, you get direct guidance from reading the book , and it takes great efforts, you have to really study the meanings of words and their origins because what we have today in the tafseer is corrupted, that's why Hadith and any past literature is valuable for linguistic purposes not to take those Hadith narratives and put them on top of Quran like everyone is doing
A-R-SH is a root word indicates a framework, like a trellis, scaffold,
So when Allah talks about being lord of the arsh he's talking about the cognitive framework of an individual,
Brother. There is so much to learn from the 4 a‘imma of the madhahib. I am a student in Egypt and my Mashayikh are Hanafee and Shafi‘ee.
I agree with the statement that rejection of Madhahib is extremism just as single-madhhab fanaticism is.
All scholars of the salaf that I know of studied fiqh in a madhhab.
@@thebeesnuts777 Brother. Can you write your explanation in Arabic please. I would like to check it’s linguistic and religious validity.
@@Bilal-ys6df
I did reply but it got deleted
Using the term a "salafi" today, ore labeling people with that term, it is totally wrong and pretty problematic!!!
The salafis war the best generation in our history, and best exemlpe for us as the ummah, for following their fotstaps!!
Of course that we as a ahlu sunnah wal jamaah, we are by difoullt foloweres of our salafs and khalefs, but all those nolidges and informations, comes through the legal schools of low (mathhabs).
Than this lecture explained by shaykh Ambdurahmam it is very very beneficial for layman people, who are the victims ore could be potential victims of some so called sudo "salafis" ore Saudi (medkhalis), who thay have phd on creating fitnah !!!
I have great respekt for sheikh Adburahaman Yusuf Mangera, despite some desagreaments about some irelevant issues!
Anyway sheikh dr.Akram Nadwi and sheikh Dr.Abdurahman, without a doubt are one of the most prominent, respected and nolidgable schoollars in UK, like Dr.sheikh Yaseer Qadhy and Dr.sheikh Hamza Yusuf in USA, and like many other prominent shuyukhs in dhe world.
May Allah protect all the ummah from all fitnas, and united our hearts upon the truth.
If you think Yasir qadi and hamza Yusuf are good honest knowledgeable scholars in USA,than brother with all honest you don't have any knowledge about their agenda of, watering down the islam to the more liberalized Verizon, reforming islam,pro LGBTQ..pro mixing of the opposite sex even in the masjids..I used to listen to these two so called "scholars/shyukh" but allhamdullellah I came across brother danyal haqiqatjoe ".. please search"the hidden agenda of Yasir qadi to reform islam " by danyal haqiqatjoe..
AS SALAAMU ALAYKUM. Soooo MANY CULTS to DEAL WITH . MAKES IT HARD FOR People interested in EMBRACING. ISLAM .
And yet, Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. Interesting...
Its easy, stick to the Traditional Sunni Schools, I learnt thats the simplist and best and most authentic, the hard way. wasted 25 years before that bro.
@@BeObjectiveBeHumble the “Traditional” Islam is what the prophet was upon, what his sahaba were upon and the tabi’een and atbaa at tabi’een. Not what came out of India in the early 20th century in a town called deoband.
@@FazsterHQbarelwi
The 2nd chap really got to the nitty gritty of it.
So salafis are not united? And hanafis are united??? Wow.. Can't get more hilarous than this...
Hanafi deobandi
Hanafi barelwi
Hanafi deobandi hayati
Hanafi deobandi mamati
And also the sheikh seems to have forgtten the ugly fights between two factions of tableegh jamaath in masaajids
People got killed in Bangladesh sheikh.
Like our religion warned us" If you have no shame than do what you want"
No...ghair muqallid and salafis are not united. They also do takfeer of each other. Barelwi and deobandi differ in aqeedah not fiqh. You guys fight over fiqh and aqeedah.
P.s tableegh isn't opposite of being muqallid or ghair muqallid. Many salafi brothers are active In this effort. To be tablighi doesn't oppose you being salafi. That's a misconception and a wrong perception.
@@anisdesai4692 that's your view... Not the truth... Barelwis don't even pray behind deobandis... Know before you talk
@@anisdesai4692 so aqeeda is more important or fiqh? You need to learn basics my brother... You are downplaying aqeeda so Casually.. That's the difference between you and salafis....
@@anisdesai4692 salafis might be friendly and cooperative towards tableegh people but they don't approve of them wholly and also make clear where they are deviated.... Salafi ulemas were more far sighted than deobandi hanfi ulemas as they were the ones who first warned about the deviations of tabligh jamat... Now the biggest deobandi seminary in the world Darululoom deoband itself has issued so many fatawaas against them... Check first before you talk... From a former deobandi tablighhi to a salafi, Alhamdulillah i know what iam talking about... Do your homework before you post online next time..
JazakAllah khair for this . Very well explained Shaykh , mashAllah