@@zhelyo_physics THE UNIVERSAL, BALANCED, INTEGRATED, EXTENSIVE, IRREFUTABLE, CLEAR, SIMPLE, AND TOP DOWN MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA (ON BALANCE): It is a very great truth that THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. What is gravity is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked ON BALANCE. Great. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ! Great. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE !! Great. Consider the tides in relation to what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. HALF of the view of WHAT IS THE EARTH is BLUE (ON BALANCE) when the Pacific Ocean is then SEEN in full VIEW. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/AS) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. NOW, carefully consider what is THE MAN (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Very carefully consider what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE. (LOOK up at what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky, AS THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE.) CLEAR water comes from what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Great. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Consider what is THE EYE. So, LOOK at what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON AND what is the orange (AND setting) Sun ON BALANCE. Now, think about what is LAVA. E=MC2 IS F=ma. SO, we then multiply ONE HALF times one half in order to determine the size of the Moon. (It IS about one fourth the size of the Earth.) This is CONSISTENT with the fact that the Moon IS (on balance) LAND. Therefore, the density of THE SUN is (ON BALANCE) about ONE FOURTH of that of what is THE EARTH; AS E=MC2 IS then CLEARLY proven to be F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Again, it all CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE !!! The BULK DENSITY of the Moon is comparable to that of (volcanic) basaltic LAVAS on the Earth. The energy density of LAVA IS about THREE TIMES that of water. SO, now, get a good and CLEAR LOOK at what is the ORANGE SUN !!! We WOULD then multiply ONE THIRD times one half in order to obtain the surface gravity that is experienced by the man on the Moon. (It IS one sixth of that of the man who is on the Earth.) The maria ("lunar seas") on the Moon do take up ONE THIRD of what is the near side of the Moon. Excellent. The Moon is ALSO BLUE on balance. Great !!! Now, in conclusion, the land surface area of THE EARTH is 29 PERCENT; AND this is EXACTLY ON BALANCE WITH BOTH one third AND one fourth; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY F=ma !!!!! GOT IT !!! GREAT. E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY proven to be gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It must be, and it is. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
Good question! We are just using proportionality then, I.e. aplitude doubles so the intensity must increase by a factor of 4. You will get the same answer if you convert the units, figure out the constant of proportionality etc, but this is just a bit quicker.
Hel...lo ,sir I wanna know SI unit of constant k . I think it would be watt per fouth meter.But I'm not sure yet. And I don't know whether it's right or wrong .please teach me sir.🙏🙏🙏🙏
Hel..lo ,sir .is there another formula that respect to intensity and amplitude? If we derive the formula like this I varie A square I = constant × A square I/A square =constant So, I/Asquare =I'/A' square I wanna know is that right?
excellent question... so for a mechanical wave (not light) a good way to think about it is that amplitude is proportional to energy which is proportional to displacement squared. For light the relationship comes from Maxwell's equations which if you study physics later down the line you will derive.
I had seen questions where the frequency of one is say 506 and another is 500 and they used only amplitude square. Why didn't we also square the frequency to find the intensity ratio?
@@lanadelreysguitar Ah, I see what you mean. So we use the angular velocity equation only for oscillations. There is no actual wave propagating in this case, just an object vibrating. The equation I is proportional to A^2 is for a wave only, and the other one for oscillations only. I have covered this here also: th-cam.com/video/bZ2FHLm_X64/w-d-xo.html Hope this helps!
Question is right actually. We are just using proportionality then, I.e. aplitude doubles so the intensity must increase by a factor of 4. You will get the same answer if you convert the units, figure out the constant of proportionality etc, but this is just a bit quicker. Hope this makes sense, if not drop me a comment and I'll explain it further.
This was in paper 2 today, the intensity amplitude truck helped so much thank you !!
Best channel for Physics, you're amazing!
Thanks a lot! Much appreciated!
@@zhelyo_physics THE UNIVERSAL, BALANCED, INTEGRATED, EXTENSIVE, IRREFUTABLE, CLEAR, SIMPLE, AND TOP DOWN MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA (ON BALANCE):
It is a very great truth that THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience.
What is gravity is an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked ON BALANCE. Great.
TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ! Great. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE !! Great. Consider the tides in relation to what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. HALF of the view of WHAT IS THE EARTH is BLUE (ON BALANCE) when the Pacific Ocean is then SEEN in full VIEW.
E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.
Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/AS) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.
NOW, carefully consider what is THE MAN (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Very carefully consider what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL EXPERIENCE. (LOOK up at what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky, AS THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE.) CLEAR water comes from what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Great. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Consider what is THE EYE. So, LOOK at what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON AND what is the orange (AND setting) Sun ON BALANCE. Now, think about what is LAVA. E=MC2 IS F=ma. SO, we then multiply ONE HALF times one half in order to determine the size of the Moon. (It IS about one fourth the size of the Earth.) This is CONSISTENT with the fact that the Moon IS (on balance) LAND. Therefore, the density of THE SUN is (ON BALANCE) about ONE FOURTH of that of what is THE EARTH; AS E=MC2 IS then CLEARLY proven to be F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Again, it all CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE !!!
The BULK DENSITY of the Moon is comparable to that of (volcanic) basaltic LAVAS on the Earth. The energy density of LAVA IS about THREE TIMES that of water. SO, now, get a good and CLEAR LOOK at what is the ORANGE SUN !!! We WOULD then multiply ONE THIRD times one half in order to obtain the surface gravity that is experienced by the man on the Moon. (It IS one sixth of that of the man who is on the Earth.) The maria ("lunar seas") on the Moon do take up ONE THIRD of what is the near side of the Moon. Excellent. The Moon is ALSO BLUE on balance. Great !!! Now, in conclusion, the land surface area of THE EARTH is 29 PERCENT; AND this is EXACTLY ON BALANCE WITH BOTH one third AND one fourth; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY F=ma !!!!! GOT IT !!! GREAT.
E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY proven to be gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It must be, and it is.
By Frank Martin DiMeglio
I have difficulty in understanding this for soooo long. Thank you!
Glad this helped!
same here! this video was awesome!!
thanks!
doesnt the cm have to be converted to m?
at 5:26
Good question! We are just using proportionality then, I.e. aplitude doubles so the intensity must increase by a factor of 4. You will get the same answer if you convert the units, figure out the constant of proportionality etc, but this is just a bit quicker.
but u get 0.04, if u convert, and if you dont convert you get 400.@@zhelyo_physics
why r y doing x10^-2 if it’s already in cm? 7:03
is this included in edexcel a level ?
Always check with your syllabus, to be used as a checklist. I would be very surprised it it is not.
@@zhelyo_physics ok thank you sir
Hel...lo ,sir I wanna know SI unit of constant k . I think it would be watt per fouth meter.But I'm not sure yet. And I don't know whether it's right or wrong .please teach me sir.🙏🙏🙏🙏
so k=I/A^2 I is W/m^2 which J/(sm^2)/m^2 which is J/(sm^4) you can express it in base units if you plug in that J=kgm^2s^(-2)
great video, thank you
anytime! thanks for the comment!
Hel..lo ,sir .is there another formula that respect to intensity and amplitude? If we derive the formula like this
I varie A square
I = constant × A square
I/A square =constant
So,
I/Asquare =I'/A' square
I wanna know is that right?
exactly right
In question 2, should k = 100/ 10^-2x 10^-2 = 1 million ?
Nope, it's k=100/(10*10^(-2)*10*10^(-2)) Hope this helps!
thank you so much , but maybe can just explain to me , why is the amplitude squared
excellent question... so for a mechanical wave (not light) a good way to think about it is that amplitude is proportional to energy which is proportional to displacement squared. For light the relationship comes from Maxwell's equations which if you study physics later down the line you will derive.
Sir when do we use w²a² and when do we use a²
Sorry I don't quite understand the question? What is a and w in the expression you mean?
@@zhelyo_physics w is angular frequency and a is amplitude sir
I had seen questions where the frequency of one is say 506 and another is 500 and they used only amplitude square. Why didn't we also square the frequency to find the intensity ratio?
@@lanadelreysguitar Ah, I see what you mean. So we use the angular velocity equation only for oscillations. There is no actual wave propagating in this case, just an object vibrating. The equation I is proportional to A^2 is for a wave only, and the other one for oscillations only. I have covered this here also: th-cam.com/video/bZ2FHLm_X64/w-d-xo.html Hope this helps!
@@zhelyo_physics yes I get it now sir thnnk you so much :)
Why is it the cm x10^-2 ?
it's just the mathematical power of 10 attached to the prefix 1 cm=0.01 m ,i.e. 10^(-2) m. Hope this helps!
You are amazing
Thanks a lot for the comment!
the first question you did is wrong. You didn't convert the amplitude to meters
Question is right actually. We are just using proportionality then, I.e. aplitude doubles so the intensity must increase by a factor of 4. You will get the same answer if you convert the units, figure out the constant of proportionality etc, but this is just a bit quicker. Hope this makes sense, if not drop me a comment and I'll explain it further.