As a student pilot, I find a lot of your videos very useful and interesting. It's always good to get a nice, broad understanding of the whys and wherefores in aviation.
I think Schiphol has done a great job, because it has many, but good working runways. And keeping in mind that only 3 can be used at the same time it works really well
The busiest airport in the world, KATL, uses four runways: two parallel sets of two on each side of the North and South Terminals. Each set of two parallel runways consists of one for landing and the other for takeoffs, so there is no issue with aircraft spacing. There is now a fifth runway, also parallel and to the south of the other four, with enough lateral separation to allow unrestricted landings and takeoffs; it is commonly used mostly for evening landings when capacity is otherwise reached.
@@princekamoro3869 no. See 3:04 in the video. One of each pair of runways to the north and south of ATL's terminals and aprons is used for landings, the other for takeoffs, so they can operate independently. The fifth runway is well south of the rest, and can operate completely independently -- usually for arrivals only during the busiest times since it's a long taxi.
@@PaulCashman FAA standard is 2500 ft spacing with takeoff/go-around paths diverging at least 30 degrees, for independent IFR takeoff/landings on parallel runways.
@@princekamoro3869 thanks. How would that negatively affect ATL's sets of parallel runways if each pair has one runway for arrivals and one for departures? --Aside from longer intervals, that is....
As an Englishman, I was rather hoping that you might cover the five pointed star design that LHR began as. I presume that this was a wartime expedient designed to cover pretty much every wind direction and only possible because of the lower frequency of movements. A newcomer, I'm glad I found you and I'm enjoying the concise entertainment, thank you. Can't believe I'm about to say this as an imperial measures in my blood Brit, but the bigger you get, the more helpful conversion to metric (in brackets) will be. Sacrilegious I know, but we've been got by the metric monopoly over here. Except for pints and miles t.G.!
At Mumbai VABB We definitely need additional parallel runway We are busiest single runway airport in the world Only operating one of our two intersecting rwy configuration Hopefully the new airport solves much of these issues
At Ninoy Aquino International Airport located in Manila Philippines, our runway type is the intersecting runway. Plus our runway size is R6/24 3,737m 12,261ft and R13/31 2367m 7,408ft. In New Manila International Airport is under construction our runway type is a parallel runway and has 6 according to wikipedia and the direction is N/A so the size of the new runway is 3,500m and 11,483ft.
For 3:05, wouldn't capacity go from "greatly increased" to "marginally increased" under instrument conditions? (That would make this layout more susceptible to bad weather)
It depends. In general if it isn't busy enough everyone is going to want the runway which has the best headwind so the pattern will naturally form around it. I don't think there is a regulation saying only one pattern can exist at a time (I am only a student pilot) so if there are planes flying in different patterns then I think the key is good situational and radio awareness as always. Also the chart supplement can denote runways as having a right pattern (instead of left) which can minimize the patterns overlapping
Also my home airport (kgvl) only has 1 runway with an ils approach so if conditions aren't vfr (visual flight rules - good visibility basically, you can google the exact requirements) then the operations become one runway even though the airport usually has 2 intersecting runways
I would to work at Salt Lake City (kslc) they have 3 parallel runways 34L/16R 34R/16L and 35/17 and it has a small runway the is in a parallel angle to the others (dose not intersect any runway) I don't know it's magnetic headed off the top of my head
![Back-taxi or Backtrack explained by real ATC [ATC for you]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cz3B7D0xhl4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Back-taxi or Backtrack explained by real ATC [ATC for you]](/img/tr.png)
![All about runway markings [atc for you]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/k_CrrAfEQHE/mqdefault.jpg)
Very useful vedio and thank you so much I want much more related topics 😊
Thank you so much💝👍🎁
Remember that only Chuck Norris can land on Runway 37...
As a student pilot, I find a lot of your videos very useful and interesting. It's always good to get a nice, broad understanding of the whys and wherefores in aviation.
Where can I do the runway configuration training?
Where was this channel in 2019 when I was doing my ATC course 😭😭😭 ......love the content always good to keep my knowledge fresh
I’m starting flight school soon, I feel like I need this so thank you!
Thanks 😊 Good luck 🍀✈️
I think Schiphol has done a great job, because it has many, but good working runways. And keeping in mind that only 3 can be used at the same time it works really well
Thanks so much☺️☺️
When I heard Schiphol, I remembered about Polderbaan Runway. The most furthest runway from Terminal.
The busiest airport in the world, KATL, uses four runways: two parallel sets of two on each side of the North and South Terminals. Each set of two parallel runways consists of one for landing and the other for takeoffs, so there is no issue with aircraft spacing.
There is now a fifth runway, also parallel and to the south of the other four, with enough lateral separation to allow unrestricted landings and takeoffs; it is commonly used mostly for evening landings when capacity is otherwise reached.
Nope it's not KALT really it's KORD is the busiest Airport in the world more runways parallel and the controllers are the best
Wouldn't ATL have to treat those runway pairs as single runways when the weather goes IFR?
@@princekamoro3869 no. See 3:04 in the video. One of each pair of runways to the north and south of ATL's terminals and aprons is used for landings, the other for takeoffs, so they can operate independently. The fifth runway is well south of the rest, and can operate completely independently -- usually for arrivals only during the busiest times since it's a long taxi.
@@PaulCashman FAA standard is 2500 ft spacing with takeoff/go-around paths diverging at least 30 degrees, for independent IFR takeoff/landings on parallel runways.
@@princekamoro3869 thanks. How would that negatively affect ATL's sets of parallel runways if each pair has one runway for arrivals and one for departures? --Aside from longer intervals, that is....
Nice to learn four kinds of runway
I think the best configuration the parallel runway !! great video.
Your videos are priceless, thank you!
Thank you so much! 🍀✈️
As an Englishman, I was rather hoping that you might cover the five pointed star design that LHR began as.
I presume that this was a wartime expedient designed to cover pretty much every wind direction and only possible because of the lower frequency of movements.
A newcomer, I'm glad I found you and I'm enjoying the concise entertainment, thank you.
Can't believe I'm about to say this as an imperial measures in my blood Brit, but the bigger you get, the more helpful conversion to metric (in brackets) will be.
Sacrilegious I know, but we've been got by the metric monopoly over here.
Except for pints and miles t.G.!
Be interesting to see if Heathrow 3rd runway will ever come in to fruition? I hope so & it will take many years to build it.
I am building my own airfield in the Trainz simulator and videos like this are a big help.
Excellent explanation.
Thanks so much. 😊 ✈️Have a great day!
Love you so much admin. Thanks for this video
AWESOME video.......more videos please !!!! Thank you
Your video is extremely helpful to aviation administration students!
I believe this what Gatwick would like to install as they only operate on a single runway in the UK 👍
Very nice one
Thank you 🙏
At Brasília/Brazil we work with parallel runways. Best way to do it. 🥰
parralel is best
Standard phraseology is Ready for departure not ready for take off.
At Mumbai VABB
We definitely need additional parallel runway
We are busiest single runway airport in the world Only operating one of our two intersecting rwy configuration
Hopefully the new airport solves much of these issues
The best runway configuration it's nowhere else like Sydney YSSY. Ladies and gentlemen. ☝️
At Ninoy Aquino International Airport located in Manila Philippines, our runway type is the intersecting runway. Plus our runway size is R6/24 3,737m 12,261ft and R13/31 2367m 7,408ft. In
New Manila International Airport is under construction our runway type is a parallel runway and has 6 according to wikipedia and the direction is N/A so the size of the new runway is 3,500m and 11,483ft.
perfect for my first airport in cities skylines
Maybe I missed it but it would be useful to specify to which CAA this video applies to.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Thanks thanks thanks, too.🥰🥰
Dream to be an controller down in the amazing KMCO Orlando International Airport. My home port and amazing one too.
Nice vid
3:16 is the design of bulacan international airport
For 3:05, wouldn't capacity go from "greatly increased" to "marginally increased" under instrument conditions? (That would make this layout more susceptible to bad weather)
What is the minimum time difference between two Consecutive Aircraft landing or takeoff?
Thank you !
so if you have intersecting runways at an uncontrolled airport does each runway have different patterns operating simultaneously?
It depends. In general if it isn't busy enough everyone is going to want the runway which has the best headwind so the pattern will naturally form around it. I don't think there is a regulation saying only one pattern can exist at a time (I am only a student pilot) so if there are planes flying in different patterns then I think the key is good situational and radio awareness as always. Also the chart supplement can denote runways as having a right pattern (instead of left) which can minimize the patterns overlapping
Also my home airport (kgvl) only has 1 runway with an ils approach so if conditions aren't vfr (visual flight rules - good visibility basically, you can google the exact requirements) then the operations become one runway even though the airport usually has 2 intersecting runways
not sure if intersecting rwy can be both operated at the same time
If the wind is calm then why not?
I would to work at Salt Lake City (kslc) they have 3 parallel runways 34L/16R 34R/16L and 35/17 and it has a small runway the is in a parallel angle to the others (dose not intersect any runway) I don't know it's magnetic headed off the top of my head
Thanks to you
🙏🙏😊🎁
For me Madrid (LEMD) has the best configuration
Definitely one of if not the best, with it’s parallel runways heading different directions
Which airport have parallel runway
4:26, Eg: CS Int Airport Mumbai (BOM)
🛑 octagonal 8 runway ....8 D ease of access.......
San Francisco, O'Hare, Washington ......
Plz do more short videos plz
Accasionally I misspell words too...
The best configuration is Denver Intl. and it's not because the runways are shaped like a swastika.
of course a parallel runways are the best
Accupancy?
Metric please
Don't ouit
Don't worry 😉 We're still here for U.✈️😊👍
Koe ngomong aku memraibke Biden opo America tohhhh Yoo karepmu.
ENZV sola AirPort Norway cross runaway
All this is good to know but I've found that all I need is a good snort before take off.
Cah cilik di apakke cah bayi
Turn the crappy noise off in the background
That's not how to spell occupancy!!!