@@AircraftScience Looking forward to it. Please post the reason behind MLG that are titled fwd on B767 as well. Just wanna know is it due to C.G position so that the MLG tilted fwd?
I don't know why people have trouble understanding a simple concept. When an aircraft ditches in water, water can attenuate high frequency radio signals, hence the difficulty in finding the beacon in the 24-72 hour time limit. Why is this so hard to understand?
@@TactileCoder Many people don't read much and take little in the way of science classes but somehow become experts when they feel like it. To me it just goes to show we have some room for improvement in our location systems.
That's not a fair statement @@shawnmulberry774 as many are genuinely asking question. I personally have a relative on that flight and I also would like to know. The reason is should a plane hit water, it does not sink automatically therefore the beacon would have triggered something but there was nothing.
I don't know why people have trouble understanding a simple concept. When an aircraft ditches in water, water can attenuate high frequency radio signals, hence the difficulty in finding the beacon in the 24-72 hour time limit. Why is this so hard to understand?
@@cocojeffrey8502 No, but i've seen a photo taken by an indonesian fisherman in an news channel in TH-cam, and the condition of the plane was HORRIBLE! And i think that the plane has sunk
Very informative. Thank you, comrade
Interesting topic 👏👏
Thanks!
could you do some clips that explain tilted fwd and backward of MLG?
Yes, will do that in the triple seven landing gear series.
@@AircraftScience Looking forward to it. Please post the reason behind MLG that are titled fwd on B767 as well. Just wanna know is it due to C.G position so that the MLG tilted fwd?
So where is mh370?
I don't know why people have trouble understanding a simple concept. When an aircraft ditches in water, water can attenuate high frequency radio signals, hence the difficulty in finding the beacon in the 24-72 hour time limit. Why is this so hard to understand?
@@TactileCoder Many people don't read much and take little in the way of science classes but somehow become experts when they feel like it. To me it just goes to show we have some room for improvement in our location systems.
That's not a fair statement @@shawnmulberry774 as many are genuinely asking question. I personally have a relative on that flight and I also would like to know. The reason is should a plane hit water, it does not sink automatically therefore the beacon would have triggered something but there was nothing.
33.177°S, 95.3° E
Beacon probably got destroyed
Except MH370.
I don't know why people have trouble understanding a simple concept. When an aircraft ditches in water, water can attenuate high frequency radio signals, hence the difficulty in finding the beacon in the 24-72 hour time limit. Why is this so hard to understand?
The underwater beacon of the blackbox has run out of battery.
Yet we still lost MH370…
We didn't lose it. We were steered to look elsewhere while the plane was flown somewhere else.
However@@P_double_H this system seems powered by a G-Switch at 0:32. I am asking the very same question.
Perhaps the beacon got destroyed on impact?
and they couldnt find mh370? hmmmmm
That plane has been severely destroyed and has sunk, because of this, the beacon has been damaged underwater
@@andreizadasilvapereira5312 did you witness it!😱
@@cocojeffrey8502 No, but i've seen a photo taken by an indonesian fisherman in an news channel in TH-cam, and the condition of the plane was HORRIBLE! And i think that the plane has sunk
@@andreizadasilvapereira5312 😱 I'm sure the family members will want the plane found
@@cocojeffrey8502, I know
This is NOT the Ukrainian flag!
Blue: Sky
Yellow: Sand
oh i notice ukrainian flag colours are used in the background...coinky dink? 😅
It's just a coincidence