Demonstration with a partner is bad. He just misplaced the ball with a "gong" (to the body, or deep to the right), so his partner made a mistake. Mistake because of misplacement, not because of a strong hit.
*I think (based on the intro explanantion)* the idea is that you have the basic backhand (flatter contact but still with slight brush over top and forward, with no racket angle change), backhand topspin (more closed angle, more brush, more over top, still somewhat constant racket angle or slightly wrapping over top of ball for some) and then the "Gong" backhand (similar set up and stroke direction as the other two, but you are slightly opening racket as you contact, which hits ball forward while also getting the spin from the rubber contact *not clearly shown in later demonstrations*) - translates to a bumped ball that has a straight trajectory from racket that goes a little lower and longer on the table). Later demonstrations don't seem to show much difference, only more power being added and then discussion of a short, snappy stroke. Main idea to me seems to be borrowing/using opponents speed and spin with proper timing and slightly thicker/flatter contact then a typical topspin or spin-counter. If a normal backhand topspin contact point is closer to front of racket (closer to incoming ball when held horizontally), the Kong would seem to be more in the middle due to the need to hit while slightly opening racket. Just my thoughts, not sure how correct they are and I think it is a small detail that is maybe more a mental approach to timing/power/etc. than a major difference in how the ball is hit.
They fail to explain what is seemingly special about this stroke. I see nothing. And actual pro backhands vary largely and are way faster and spinnier.
![Secret Chinese Technique: Win with the 'Small Triangle Serve[Table Tennis]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/35LGFwsMfTM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Secret Chinese Technique: Win with the 'Small Triangle Serve[Table Tennis]](/img/tr.png)
![Ma Long Flick: Master the 'Fan Tiao' Technique[Table Tennis]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vY-eCy1WndE/mqdefault.jpg)
![ปฏิเสธไม่ไหว (Crush on you) - LIPTA feat. No One Else [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NBw1jF342vw/mqdefault.jpg)
![Naoki Coach's Lightning-Fast Chiquita Lesson for Skill Boost[Table Tennis]](/img/n.gif)
You made this video and everyone learned a lot.😍😍😍🏓🏓🏓
Спасибо! Это надо попробовать.
🏓👍🇷🇺🤝🇯🇵🤝🇨🇳
좋은 탁구 강의 입니다.
기술적인 부분들에 매번 감탄 하고 있습니다.
ビデオをありがとう。リン・シンドンのバックハンドに関するテクニックを説明してもらえますか?
Здравствуйте! Всё хорошо рассказали . Так держать ❤
有点像在击打过程中，向上快速小拉，以增加旋转。腕扭向前上，而不是仅向前。
就是加速向前蹭了，旋转一般速度突然变快了
Thanks
Bonjour,
Génial comme vidéo 😊 quelle est l'épaisseur de vos mousses? Je regarde beaucoup vos vidéos. Encore merci 😉
Wow. It seems like you do this using a short pips too.. 😮
Demonstration with a partner is bad. He just misplaced the ball with a "gong" (to the body, or deep to the right), so his partner made a mistake. Mistake because of misplacement, not because of a strong hit.
I didn't understand the difference at all.
*I think (based on the intro explanantion)* the idea is that you have the basic backhand (flatter contact but still with slight brush over top and forward, with no racket angle change), backhand topspin (more closed angle, more brush, more over top, still somewhat constant racket angle or slightly wrapping over top of ball for some) and then the "Gong" backhand (similar set up and stroke direction as the other two, but you are slightly opening racket as you contact, which hits ball forward while also getting the spin from the rubber contact *not clearly shown in later demonstrations*) - translates to a bumped ball that has a straight trajectory from racket that goes a little lower and longer on the table). Later demonstrations don't seem to show much difference, only more power being added and then discussion of a short, snappy stroke. Main idea to me seems to be borrowing/using opponents speed and spin with proper timing and slightly thicker/flatter contact then a typical topspin or spin-counter. If a normal backhand topspin contact point is closer to front of racket (closer to incoming ball when held horizontally), the Kong would seem to be more in the middle due to the need to hit while slightly opening racket. Just my thoughts, not sure how correct they are and I think it is a small detail that is maybe more a mental approach to timing/power/etc. than a major difference in how the ball is hit.
打ち方の違いが分からない。球が伸びて跳ねるというのは結果の事であり、その違いを生む打ち方の違いとその理由を知りたい
I tried, but it is not easy to learn
Amazing!
反手打出不同的节奏 速度和轨迹
8の字打法に似てるような気がする
New subscriber from indonesia here 🇮🇩 please always have indonesian subtitle on your video, thank you 🔥
Фан Жендонг использует
Супер!
拱
здравствуйте классное видео Вы продаете товар в Россию ?
與其說"拱",不如說是"攻".....這絕不是甚麼中國的創新招...以前的選手用多了去. 大陸近期反手老喜歡用抬肘"刻意"擰手腕....這則是將小臂伸展出去不刻意"過分"去擰手腕的擊球.
攻是前后推，拱是指这个球二跳向前向上挤到对手。至于谁创造的，无所谓了
Прекрасный канал, но перевод страдает,
To be honest this is completely bullshit. Basically a backhand drive.
They fail to explain what is seemingly special about this stroke. I see nothing. And actual pro backhands vary largely and are way faster and spinnier.
ごぉーん！