Infinite Jest's Fractal Structure Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 30

  • @WriteConscious
    @WriteConscious  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🚀 Do you want help finishing Infinite Jest? Or want a complete guide to follow while reading?
    Join my Infinite Jest Course and Book Club here: writeconscious.substack.com
    📚 Explore over 400 of Wallace’s favorite books in my free guide to his favorite books
    Access here: writeconscious.ck.page/8956ce90fc
    📖 Want to WRITE better? Join my free writing school: www.skool.com/writeconscious
    Insta: instagram.com/writeconscious
    📕My Best Books of All-Time List: writeconscious.ck.page/355619345e
    🔥Want to READ my wife’s fire poetry? Go here: marigoldeclipse.substack.com
    🤔David Foster Wallace’s Favorite Book on Writing amzn.to/4eVmjAI

  • @Ernesto_the_Caffiend
    @Ernesto_the_Caffiend ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Infinite Jest is an endless mine of content, and I'm here for it

  • @jasperheckinbocker1101
    @jasperheckinbocker1101 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I spent my last two years of college trying to figure out how to write a story a fractal structure. I heard the interview after reading the book and tried and tried to map out what it would look like. The diagram at the beginning isn't too far off from where I landed before I gave up!

  • @flame85246
    @flame85246 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What is an example form the text? I get the idea conceptually, the idea of a triangle that repeats itself, but what does this look like in the book? I think a more concrete example would help me understand the concept more clearly

    • @WriteConscious
      @WriteConscious  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A guy named Tim sent this in an email to me the other day. Thought it would be a good response for this
      ". The novel itself, however, is composed of three distinct addiction narratives that form the three connected sides of a triangle: James', Hal's, and Gately's. Each of the three narratives go through similar iterations, forming the Sierpinski Gasket. For example, compare the details in Hal's Eschaton scene with those in Gately's street fight outside Ennet House. Their narratives are already virtually identical, but what you're supposed to recognize from these details is how they're different."

  • @jimmyallen8210
    @jimmyallen8210 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is just what I needed. Thanks! Subscribed

  • @altsenmm7857
    @altsenmm7857 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I always interpreted the fractal structure as a way to see the whole rather than the pieces, the integral part of the work is "there" yet there is always a remaining core or plot point from any point of view. Every section open questions and those questions might be answered by later chapters but only to refer to another footone or any previous instance that you are supposed to drawn from each other, thus making it an infinite piece.

  • @enriccoc7794
    @enriccoc7794 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm looking forward to your Infinite Jest videos! By total coincidence I'm reading a book called "A New Kind of Science" by Stephan Wolfram, and it has the Sierpinski triangle's on the book cover. The book is mostly about complexity but lots of fractals, algorithms and chaos theory so far (I'm only a few chapters in)

  • @bryson2662
    @bryson2662 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I can't seem to find the chapter by chapter breakdown you speak of in the first minute

  • @letsd0good
    @letsd0good 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wow that is cool! intrigued and happy to be following along. i am a novice here with infinite jest fresh copy in hand.

  • @operadood
    @operadood 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where are the videos? I see only chapter one on your channel

  • @gnushu
    @gnushu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That triangle breakdown diagram is taken from greg Carlisle's "elegant complexity". It's his idea of what dfw may have meant

  • @diorblunt
    @diorblunt ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’ve heard lots of people online respond to IJ’s “fractal structure” as the epitome of pretentiousness. I’ve always felt it was genius and so uniquely DFW you can’t help but admire it on some level. I guess it’s just more popular to shit on Wallace nowadays rather than appreciate him :(

    • @jameschristenbury2625
      @jameschristenbury2625 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Honestly I like when writers are real pretentious. At least they are trying something unique.

    • @alexhopewell449
      @alexhopewell449 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, I’d hardly call a choice like that “pretentious.” I think Wallace just wrote the way he wanted to write.

    • @WriteConscious
      @WriteConscious  ปีที่แล้ว

      Naw, the haters are only strong because of how many people love him.

  • @RatSplatigan
    @RatSplatigan ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Write Conscious is the Headquarters of DFW content on TH-cam? I thought you were the HQ of McCarthy content on TH-cam! Either way LFG I am so ready for this let's goooooo! 2023 Year of Write Conscious Year of Glad u are doing this Year of the Biden Adult Undergarment let's get it WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    • @WriteConscious
      @WriteConscious  ปีที่แล้ว

      It can be both if I put out enough content!

  • @christinapeterson8210
    @christinapeterson8210 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Definitely kind in interviews. Not sure about in his personal life. I do like Infinite Jest but that man had some demons.

  • @gloria.
    @gloria. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wheres the chapter by chapter breakdowns

    • @WriteConscious
      @WriteConscious  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Coming soon! Got lost in Cormac content for a bit. I need to get a thing or two done on the Cormac side before I pivot to DFW stuff. Want to have my Cormac course padded with a little more content. But, shouldn't be more than a week!

    • @gloria.
      @gloria. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WriteConscious awesome looking forward to it 😀 👍

  • @PoetlaureateNFDL
    @PoetlaureateNFDL ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting

  • @reallyrealraven
    @reallyrealraven 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He was high af from what people who knew him say but go off

    • @WriteConscious
      @WriteConscious  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He was sober for the entire length of him writing the novel.