Single-photon detectors - Krister Shalm

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 55

  • @mohammadsadeghashrafpoor6737
    @mohammadsadeghashrafpoor6737 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It was the greatest lecture that i've seen about this topic
    I really needed to understand how it works by real fibers instead of just seeing some slides ❤

  • @mfglinux
    @mfglinux 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice talk and nice recording. One can watch it like if we were there. Congrats to the speaker for his educational spirit

  • @drarp
    @drarp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    The real content starts at 9:01

    • @janalbrecht5099
      @janalbrecht5099 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      love people like you thank you

  • @abdulrahmanalbarqi5992
    @abdulrahmanalbarqi5992 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice lecture. i was wondering how can you distinguish between initial detection and after pulse detection? thank you 01:14:00

  • @drvignesh
    @drvignesh 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thought provoking and interesting info regarding single photons!

  • @ArpitAgarwal1
    @ArpitAgarwal1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    very insightful in the field of SPS and detector

  • @rastislavblablabla3615
    @rastislavblablabla3615 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent lecture. Do you have it in written form? I come from Slovakia and some things I do not understand well and I would like to read it all.

  • @aroopkantibose1373
    @aroopkantibose1373 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    very nice talk

  • @engx3733
    @engx3733 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    We are dealing with pulse issue with our quantum device running at quanta - Is there any detector that can solve this issue?

  • @phyozeng223
    @phyozeng223 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great talk!

  • @jamesstewart7212
    @jamesstewart7212 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any thought on the size of a photon? Could they be large or very large but the detection efficiency low?

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Photons are energy. Energy doesn't have a size.

    • @jamesstewart7212
      @jamesstewart7212 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@schmetterling4477 Photons have momentum, can be discreet (photoelectric effect) or wavelike (interference). The wavelength can be miles long (radio) or discreet (gamma). But no size?

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jamesstewart7212 Photons are irreversible energy transfers between an electromagnetic field and an external system. A photon never shows interference effects. Only the quantum mechanical ensemble of an em field does. Most people, many physicists included, are having a hard time distinguishing between one photon and many (the ensemble).

    • @jamesstewart7212
      @jamesstewart7212 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@schmetterling4477 Thank you for your thoughtful response. Your photon is a verb. I'll be thinking about that one.

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@schmetterling4477 So how do they know when they get a single photon then?

  • @alexandriahephaestrin634
    @alexandriahephaestrin634 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The link is not working

  • @BrendaEM
    @BrendaEM 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for posting this : )

  • @GdncHfjbdkf
    @GdncHfjbdkf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This light detectors how much photons can you see?, no more than three

  • @sudeephalder5077
    @sudeephalder5077 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please provides the answers.
    How single photon can be produced from a continuous laser source ??? Explain in details pl
    Can we use pulse laser as an replacenent of single photon source , if not how these two differ???

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      A photon is simply an irreversible energy transfer between an electromagnetic field and an external system. It doesn't take a laser or a pulsed source to detect a photon and a single detection will tell us absolutely nothing about the source.

  • @kratos5186
    @kratos5186 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm confused.Aura is light.,but we can't see that light with naked eye?

    • @MrSupervin94
      @MrSupervin94 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s ok lord Dracula, always stay away from light if you don’t want to die

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some of this talk is bs for sure.

  • @jasonbourne7179
    @jasonbourne7179 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Approved for 30k.

  • @ddstar
    @ddstar 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    46:34 totally and absolutely wrong. Read Steinmetz, Faraday and Maxwell and then Tesla. None of this is true. That's the part when relativity breaks down and quantum becomes a dumb thing. There is a spacial void between the two plates and only blue light can traverse through the because of its wave length properties. Lower frequency light bends more when it comes in contact with the magnet field, so you never see a connection of the circuit.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A chocolate Santa/cookie package is on the way to you.

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@schmetterling4477 Your the one that needs the care package.

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is not the only place he is wrong.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rl7012 Why are you so angry at people who know more than you? Did you have a bad time in high school science class? Does the humiliation sit that deep? Dudes, you need help to overcome your knowledge-phobias. :-)

  • @WalterSamuels
    @WalterSamuels ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The delusion of the "single photon". There is no such thing. The size of a "single photon" is always relative to the emitting particle's energy, and the energy received by that particle.

    • @INDIOBRAVOO
      @INDIOBRAVOO ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's a cult bro

    • @bobm4378
      @bobm4378 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      problem is, most of this is defined by MATH.. If you are in college, and want to pass, you do what the *ancient* books say... 'reality' has nothing to do with it..
      and do note 'energy' has only a level, and 'size' has a level AND length..

  • @عبدالعزيزيونس-ذ9ظ
    @عبدالعزيزيونس-ذ9ظ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In theoretical physics, what if photon is actually two photons sharing the same room.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then the wave function is fully symmetric. Bosons like to do it that way. ;-)

  • @veronicanoordzee6440
    @veronicanoordzee6440 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MODERN PHYSICS IS BECOMING A RELIGION: A LOT OF PREACHTERMEN SPEAK ABOUT ALL KINDS OF PHENOMENA, BUT THEY MAKE NO EFFORT AT ALL TO PROVE THEIR CLAIMS. ARE YOU A BELIEVER TOO?

    • @bobm4378
      @bobm4378 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @veronicanoordzee6440: you do not have to shout!! (caps)- the only 'religion' is working hard in college to get your good grades, and get a job... :/

    • @veronicanoordzee6440
      @veronicanoordzee6440 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bobm4378 YEP, IN LIFE YOU GET FEW THINGS FOR FREE. GOOD LUCK! P.S. WHEN YOUR PERSONAL PHOTON-RECEPTORS DON'T WORK THAT WELL, "SHOUTING" BECOMES INEVITABLE ;-)

  • @qualquan
    @qualquan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    unhelpful

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What was unhelpful about it?

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. Total word salad no proper scientific substance.

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rl7012 I advice you to read a book on Quantum Optics.

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacobvandijk6525 Why? It won't explain how they isolate a single photon and shoot it will it? I advice you to learn to think for yourself sunshine.

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rl7012 Why? I thought you were searching for "proper scientific substance". If not, dream on.