Excellent comparitive. I too own both of these models - the MB primarily because of the difference in finish, & the 2000 because it's so minimalist; superlative writing instruments, & I fully appreciate why you have these in your collection. P.S. I also have a MB 320 in 'Precious Resin', & like most pens from the '50's & '60's, wonderful writers; in fact, most of my MB's are from that era - irrespective of their seond or third tier status, they are far more reliable & the build quality is unparalleled. Thank you for this presentation !!
I appreciate the review. I have gotten interested in the vintage, hooded Montblanc's and there isn't an excess of information or reviews on 50-year-old pens. I love my Lamy 2000 (looks and performance) and now really want to get a 220.
That Mont Blanc has a beautifully designed nib- very attractive and stylish writer. If I bought the company, I would bring that 220 back into production.
I don't have any experience with that Montblanc, but all my Montblanc experience is vintage. I may have to look for one of those. Of course Lamy 2000 is one of my favorites. Thank you for this comparison.
Montblanc had a number of very nice smallish pens back in the 60s,70s and early 80s. I just bought on Ebay a Montblanc 22 with gold nib for $44.00 it had a small crack in the cap which I fixed with some superglue and smoothed with micromesh, the crack is no longer visible. If one is patient there are great bargains out there.
Never even knew of the Montblanc 220. Now that I do, it tempts me to death to try and get it. The only downside to it is that the pen is clearly a bit thinner than I normally like. But then I have pens that are similarly slim but otherwise lovely to have and use for other attributes. And to have a Montblanc that is a departure from the typical cigar shape is an added incentive in itself. If I can find it at a good price and very good condition I’ll surely want to have the MB 220. Thanks to this review for my happy discovery. I have the Lamy 2000, and no surprise that I like it as much and rate it just as highly like everybody else who owns it. I’m really loving these reviews of a pair of great pens and a lovely ink. I’m curious to know if all Waterman inks are very ‘safe’ to use for almost any fountain pen. I have two Waterman inks: mysterious blue, and intense black. Used to have this blue when it was called Florida blue. Must get it again.
I have just got one 220 on eBay and I am afraid that is restored with parts from another: the section on mine does not have the same material than the rest of the body :'-(
Bauhaus - form follows function - I’ll take the real McCoy...the Lamy. It’s a war horse. Mine in F is a joy. The Montblanc was discontinued for a reason...few users bought one. Hmmm. Why is it that pen reviewers have the worst penmanship in the nine planets? lol
I'm not 100% sure that the 220 was discontinued due to poor sales (there are an awful lot of them out there). I believe it was due to a big strategy shift on Montblanc's part to a luxury-brand-only company. They got rid of all moderate-priced pens from their product line and today there is really not any FP available from MB for under $600.
Excellent comparitive. I too own both of these models - the MB primarily because of the difference in finish, & the 2000 because it's so minimalist; superlative writing instruments, & I fully appreciate why you have these in your collection.
P.S. I also have a MB 320 in 'Precious Resin', & like most pens from the '50's & '60's, wonderful writers; in fact, most of my MB's are from that era - irrespective of their seond or third tier status, they are far more reliable & the build quality is unparalleled. Thank you for this presentation !!
Had forgotten what a lovely ink Waterman Serenity Blue is: thanks for reminding me!:)
Great ink...
I appreciate the review. I have gotten interested in the vintage, hooded Montblanc's and there isn't an excess of information or reviews on 50-year-old pens. I love my Lamy 2000 (looks and performance) and now really want to get a 220.
I got a 220 today. I thought it feels like Makrolon, but wasn't sure since I don't own a L2k.I'm looking forward to inking it up for the first time.
I find the nubs on the Lamy 2000 barrel helpful in aligning the nib for writing. Thanks for the review-comparison.
I have a double broad lamy 2000 and wow that montblanc has me asking serious questions. Very pretty pen and I normally don't like their styling
Using Waterman’s Serenity Blue right now. I agree, it’s a very nice blue. I enjoy your reviews, I like that you mix a pen and an ink.
That Mont Blanc has a beautifully designed nib- very attractive and stylish writer. If I bought the company, I would bring that 220 back into production.
I don't have any experience with that Montblanc, but all my Montblanc experience is vintage. I may have to look for one of those. Of course Lamy 2000 is one of my favorites. Thank you for this comparison.
It s a very different way to show pens. i like very much your work. Saludos desde España.
Interesting comparison very nicely done. Thank you !
Lamy 2000 design is still futuristic
Montblanc had a number of very nice smallish pens back in the 60s,70s and early 80s. I just bought on Ebay a Montblanc 22 with gold nib for $44.00 it had a small crack in the cap which I fixed with some superglue and smoothed with micromesh, the crack is no longer visible. If one is patient there are great bargains out there.
A shop nearby is selling the MB220 for just $50, think about picking it up today.
If it's in usable condition... That's a great price.
Never even knew of the Montblanc 220. Now that I do, it tempts me to death to try and get it. The only downside to it is that the pen is clearly a bit thinner than I normally like. But then I have pens that are similarly slim but otherwise lovely to have and use for other attributes. And to have a Montblanc that is a departure from the typical cigar shape is an added incentive in itself. If I can find it at a good price and very good condition I’ll surely want to have the MB 220. Thanks to this review for my happy discovery. I have the Lamy 2000, and no surprise that I like it as much and rate it just as highly like everybody else who owns it.
I’m really loving these reviews of a pair of great pens and a lovely ink. I’m curious to know if all Waterman inks are very ‘safe’ to use for almost any fountain pen. I have two Waterman inks: mysterious blue, and intense black. Used to have this blue when it was called Florida blue. Must get it again.
I've used pretty much all the Waterman inks in vintage pens without any problems.
What I Ink ...You have used it on vintage pens without a glitch?? All the assurance I needed. Thanks!
Damn, I want that Montblanc now.
Ah there it is! Saw two pens in the thumbnail and was confused
Waterman serenity blue, the only blue i use...
I have just got one 220 on eBay and I am afraid that is restored with parts from another: the section on mine does not have the same material than the rest of the body :'-(
Bauhaus - form follows function - I’ll take the real McCoy...the Lamy. It’s a war horse. Mine in F is a joy. The Montblanc was discontinued for a reason...few users bought one. Hmmm. Why is it that pen reviewers have the worst penmanship in the nine planets? lol
I'm not 100% sure that the 220 was discontinued due to poor sales (there are an awful lot of them out there). I believe it was due to a big strategy shift on Montblanc's part to a luxury-brand-only company. They got rid of all moderate-priced pens from their product line and today there is really not any FP available from MB for under $600.
What I Ink Yes, that would make sense. Mercedes doesn’t want to sell Mustangs.
Thank you for your video. You need to use your pens more and practice your handwriting. No offense intended. :)
At my age, my handwriting is unlikely to improve much.
Oh, you don't sound that old! Now I am torn. Because of your review, I want both pens! (ha ha)
@@WhatIInk Your handwriting has a unique characteristics to it. Plus your handwriting is consistent.