Jacques Ibert: Cinq pièces en trio (1935)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @lylecohen1638
    @lylecohen1638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Is showing the queues for the other parts in the full score as is done here standard practice? I don’t think I’ve ever seen that before

    • @TheodoreBrown314
      @TheodoreBrown314 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not normally. Those aren't so much cues as reference markings, and the only work I can think of that makes a point to displays them in the full score is an educational work where the conductor needs to know that information (Balmages' Rippling Watercolours)

    • @OrchidDev-b5o
      @OrchidDev-b5o 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      i've seen it plenty of times in orchestral context, i don't think in chamber context

  • @yoavshati
    @yoavshati 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why doesn't the clarinet have a key signature?

    • @bassoonuk
      @bassoonuk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yes, that is unusual, but it looks like the composer (or editor) simply wrote in all the accidentals for the B-flat clarinet part. In fact NONE of the parts have key signatures, despite the fact that none of the movements are in C! (OK, the 3rd movement looks like it's in A minor...) There are number of mistakes in the parts too

    • @Cornodebassetto
      @Cornodebassetto ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s not unusual in the slightest. The music is rather model and doesn’t have a true key centre hence the accidentals. I’ve played this more times than I care to remember and there are no errors.

    • @Teaspoonfossil
      @Teaspoonfossil ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think there was a point in 20th century music where they stopped adding key signatures,because tonality was being broken down completely,although this piece is more of an impressionistic piece