The NASA Artemis 2 CREWED Mission Update Is Here!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ค. 2024
  • The NASA Artemis 2 Moon Mission Update Is Here!
    Last Video: How SpaceX Will Build One Starship Every 24 Hours!
    • How SpaceX Will Build ...
    ► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
    ► Patreon: / theteslaspace
    ► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
    Mars Colonization News and Updates
    • Mars Colonization News...
    SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
    The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
    ► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
    Business Email: derek@ellify.com
    #Spacex #Space #Mars
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 136

  • @OhShiitakeMushrooms
    @OhShiitakeMushrooms ปีที่แล้ว +35

    New subscriber. Appreciate these updates that goes straight to the point without me having to skip the first 3 to 4 minutes on other update channel videos because they ask for subscribers, join something of their and/or likes.
    Keep up the good work.

  • @chammockutube
    @chammockutube ปีที่แล้ว +4

    As an engineer, I try and stay abreast of (at least) NASA’s lunar efforts, but the pipeline was unknown, but welcome news. Keep up the good work!!!

  • @gaius_enceladus
    @gaius_enceladus ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video!
    Good to see that Rocketlab are looking at sea recovery for their rockets!
    Certainly much simpler than the helicopter-hook method.
    Also great to get an update on Artemis 2 - very much looking forward to that!

  • @NoirMorter
    @NoirMorter ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I remember watching the last shuttle launch so long ago. When we began going back into space it reignited my dreams that had died, forgotten for so long. Now here I am playing catch up!

    • @horatioserpico-pn5kv
      @horatioserpico-pn5kv ปีที่แล้ว

      Wasn't really all that long ago, and also, we technically never "WE NEVER STARTED GOING BACK INTO SPACE, BECAUSE WE NEVER STOPPED. WE WERE JUST WAITING ON NEW LAUNCH VEHICLES TO LAUNCH FROM THE UNITED STATES, WE WERE STILL GOING TO SPACE ON RUSSIAN ROCKETS DURING THAT TIME", just wanted to use all caps so you wouldn't miss things, 😉

  • @lanzorghini6746
    @lanzorghini6746 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great coverage as always. Congratulations!

  • @Ben-yt2rv
    @Ben-yt2rv ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you for another great update. I feel that by following your channel and watching your vids I am updated on all things space related:-) thank you

  • @TheAstroFarmer
    @TheAstroFarmer ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’m glad the algorithm brought me to this channel! Really great content!

  • @SneakyDSP
    @SneakyDSP ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep up the good work! I really like your videos man. Non-bias, super informative, straight to the point! Won't have to scroll for hours to get all the info you delivered haha

  • @foxmccloud7055
    @foxmccloud7055 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One thing I take from Artemis I was that I was mesmerized by seeing the earth from the perspective of the moon and knowing that everything that we know, all our history, and our faiths is all on our blue sphere and that someone can cover up our planet with their thumb, showing that we are minute compared to the cosmos and we need to take care of our planet for future generations.

    • @masseffect555
      @masseffect555 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right on man, for an even more zoomed out perspective, as I'm sure you know, the pale blue dot from voyager is just so fantastic

  • @mrwaverider5537
    @mrwaverider5537 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always my favourite space news channel! 👍

  • @joee1325
    @joee1325 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good stuff, thanks!

  • @DeltaV64
    @DeltaV64 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The production quality of these videos are amazing!

    • @horatioserpico-pn5kv
      @horatioserpico-pn5kv ปีที่แล้ว

      Please, do you care to enlighten us, or at least myself as to some of the specifics to which you are referring, and I'm sure PBS would accept your input

  • @odacruz4986
    @odacruz4986 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Concise and articulate 👍

    • @owenwilson25
      @owenwilson25 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just what I was going to say.👍

  • @timetostartup3451
    @timetostartup3451 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your content! Also… you sound just like Lei who hosts the channel ‘curious elephant’

  • @themwuzthedaze
    @themwuzthedaze ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ..."it's easy to forget how dangerous crewed missions are when we routinely send people up to the ISS and recover them without much trouble"... Yeah, since SpaceX makes almost everything look easy, 'cause they're the shit! Go, SpaceX! Then, too, while I'm not sure exactly where or if this fits in, we might remember that Back In the Day, when we went to the Moon the first time, everyone and everything was a little bit gung ho under the pressure of the Cold War. Those brave astronauts were mostly, if not all, military boys who responded to a Call to Arms from the President of the United States even though, when he said that we were going to go to the Moon by the end of the decade, our so-called space program could barely launch a firecracker. But it wasn't just the military; President Kennedy's term of election wasn't called Camelot for nothing. It was not only young people but a large percentage of the populace - certainly the kind of people who worked in the nation's space program - were filled with a sense that anything was possible; and if President Kennedy said so, then by God we were going to the Moon in a decade. Also, remember that we had recently won WW II (at least that was the sense that most Americans and many people from Europe and South America held), so we could do anything. What WAS true was that although we had been isolationist, with our national industry geared for production of peacetime products, after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor and President Roosevelt declared war our industry catapulted into high gear in order to produce the wartime technologies we required. Those circumstances were recent enough that the nation still felt those impulses. Overnight, whole new technologies were invented and new means of production were developed. Our astronauts practically launched into space with a bundle of firecrackers under their butts and a slide rule in their hands, by our current standards. Those poor bastards were crammed into a space like a sardine tin with a zillion buttons, switches, dials, and lights in front of them; enough to develop psychological complexes worthy of new names. And yet...they did it! It's incredible that people died on only one launch, and THAT was during an early test. So, when I hear that the NASA administrator is trying to play it safe to avoid any problems, I think...What? There's probably an Elon Musk quote appropriate for that comment. While of course we want to do what we can to protect our astronauts, nevertheless...look at our space program after Apollo. The fervor slowly fizzled out; rather than progressing onward and upwards, we fell back into LEO activities which, while better than nothing, were a disappointment to young people who may have looked to the stars, and stodgy old people whose guiding light was not higher achievements in space, but higher profits, with back room corruption taking control over the the spirit of our youth who had hoped for more. It's hard to criticize a NASA administrator who says he wants to protect our astronauts; but is that all it is? Look at those boondoggles of the SLS and Orion: 'way, 'way overdue and over budget, and barely working even after all that. SpaceX didn't go from nothing to dominating the world space race in a decade with that sort of spirit. Oh, excuse me...did I get carried away there? Sorry...Please don't overlook that I gave this channel a thumbs up and that I watch it all the time.

  • @josephhartwell6214
    @josephhartwell6214 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think they should continue to try to catch but only for last minute safety cushions it's an awesome concept

  • @PIXEL3D_WorldofMagic
    @PIXEL3D_WorldofMagic 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:09 the Saturn V was NASA’s most powerful until this happened…
    I thought the F-1 engine was powerful but this is next level

  • @peterdorn5799
    @peterdorn5799 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    may 24 it's on my calendar now, and counting the days

  • @WDLawless
    @WDLawless ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One recommendation I would make is to rebuild the elevators so that they would face away from the rocket.

  • @tomdarco2223
    @tomdarco2223 ปีที่แล้ว

    Right On

  • @mrtichy11
    @mrtichy11 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    ULA will be worth about $0.99 if StartShip successfully perfects is launch tower landing and rapid reuse.

    • @TheAmericanCatholic
      @TheAmericanCatholic ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ULA would be worth their property in scrap value if starship is successful.

    • @thejokerking9268
      @thejokerking9268 ปีที่แล้ว

      More like starshit after the launch lmao

    • @dhvanitdesai1044
      @dhvanitdesai1044 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "If"

  • @colinbarnard6512
    @colinbarnard6512 ปีที่แล้ว

    Of COURSE, the LES was installed and armed for A-1! It's an all-up test. Every variable must be assessed, asmits a dynamic system where all the parts are affected by the others. LES is oart of the system.
    Last, before the Orion is actually used after orbital insertion, the protective shroud over the spacecraft has to be jettisoned.

  • @nikolasvelezis3755
    @nikolasvelezis3755 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello from Greece! Great channel and coverage as always.
    I want to ask something simple....why they check and detailed so many things now with this Super technology and struggling to get to the moon and they did with Apollo with the minimum technology that they have 1972?
    Did they go to the moon or no
    Iam just ask

    • @yoskarokuto3553
      @yoskarokuto3553 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Apollo 11 Press Conference

  • @paintedpony2935
    @paintedpony2935 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "It will be safe and uncomplicated" ...
    😅🤣😂
    Remind me. How many years behind schedule are they? Installing a huge fuel storage tank at 39B, so they can quickly recover from lauch aborts. It's good they have contingencies and I truly hope they succeed. BUT! This is not uncomplicated.

  • @StupidMarioBros.
    @StupidMarioBros. ปีที่แล้ว

    4:50
    For some reason the paragraph says November 2024 then the Start date says May 2024 and the planned completion says april 2023

  • @albertclarestjohn1576
    @albertclarestjohn1576 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2 da moon ALICE !

  • @marczimmerman8524
    @marczimmerman8524 ปีที่แล้ว

    SWEET

  • @yoskarokuto3553
    @yoskarokuto3553 ปีที่แล้ว

    wait to see they use only 0.1mm aluminum foil for shielding from all charged particle like use in apollo

  • @sanjayvishwakarma7774
    @sanjayvishwakarma7774 ปีที่แล้ว

    Artmis 2 good moon missions

  • @606thumper
    @606thumper ปีที่แล้ว

    Google has the Artemis II launch set for November 2024 - is this right?

  • @sidstevens9035
    @sidstevens9035 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is the main rocket actually covered in rust ?
    If not why do they make it look like it is ?

    • @_mikolaj_
      @_mikolaj_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is covered in Poliurethane based spray on foam insulation.
      While initially white/yellow, orange is the colour of said foam after it's exposed to sunlight

  • @alexlabs4858
    @alexlabs4858 ปีที่แล้ว

    And and and!! Relativity scrubbed today. But that like just happened.

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The United Launch Amazon! 😂🎉

  • @Papershields001
    @Papershields001 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Elon musk buying it would be a fantastic move for him. He’d have a virtual monopoly on Government launch contracts.

    • @falsevacuum4667
      @falsevacuum4667 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Partially why the purchase would probably not get approved.

    • @Papershields001
      @Papershields001 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@falsevacuum4667 if anti-trust laws were things that are actually respected and obeyed in America, ULA could never have been created in the first place. If musk or Bezos don’t buy it, it certainly won’t have anything to do with them being “allowed.”

    • @abzy2470
      @abzy2470 ปีที่แล้ว

      No chance. From what I understand Elon is great full that NASA awarded Spacex with a 1.5 billion dollar contract in their early days they were close to bankruptcy. Why would elon try to be greedy. When starship will wipr the floor from ULA.

  • @jimerjam6689
    @jimerjam6689 ปีที่แล้ว

    First time humans have left LEO since the last Apollo mission

  • @cake_epic6067
    @cake_epic6067 ปีที่แล้ว

    The only question for me, when they will land on it?

  • @denizaytac9859
    @denizaytac9859 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow youtube is really not showing this video to people for some reason :/

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here in lies the swamp

  • @thorin1045
    @thorin1045 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    damaged the platform: one elevator door and a hatch.
    i mean ok, had to tell that this is also destroys the platform, just like other stuff. but really...

  • @TheValarClan
    @TheValarClan ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting FLUFF piece for ULA.

  • @nebulus_wolfy2408
    @nebulus_wolfy2408 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:13 bvvvvvvv

  • @LetsGoTrue
    @LetsGoTrue ปีที่แล้ว

    The NASA CGI Green Screen Artemis 2 CREWED Mission Update Is Here!

  • @richlo8887
    @richlo8887 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let me break down what all of this means.
    SpaceX has caused the first major aerospace company to feel the heat so much, that they need to sell or go bankrupt. 🚀💪

    • @camwyn256
      @camwyn256 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm sure Elon doesn't care. Trump and Republicans already gave him $1.7 billion in 2017.

  • @yoskarokuto3553
    @yoskarokuto3553 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Apollo 11 Press Conference

  • @frankcates3322
    @frankcates3322 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But why do the people on TV always refer to this as a "crude mission"?

  • @amon_san
    @amon_san ปีที่แล้ว

    with amazon hemoraging money i doubt that Bezos will make such an expensive purchase

  • @k1p2misiek
    @k1p2misiek ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ale fajna ściema sci-fi macie fantazje

  • @marcosporto4150
    @marcosporto4150 ปีที่แล้ว

    Go to the moon without a lifeboat?
    It’s insane, look to APOLLO 13!!

  • @keithb7981
    @keithb7981 ปีที่แล้ว

    The real question for the buyer of Ula is will the Boost from an already developed rocket system outweigh the stench of unreliability and incompetence carried over from Boeing

    • @godslayer1415
      @godslayer1415 ปีที่แล้ว

      100% mission success. Boeing or not. BO is the most likely buyer - ZERO chance for Space X since what Space X does put ULA out of business.

    • @_mikolaj_
      @_mikolaj_ ปีที่แล้ว

      Unreliability and incompetence? At ULA? I think you are talking of different ULA

  • @sbanitaba2506
    @sbanitaba2506 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    YES-LIFE
    GM ALL. - BEST
    from following all ,, it seems to me
    that we are aware of the fact that
    Like the Former Generations ,,
    THIS GENERATION WILL DIE ..
    giving back to MY
    DISCOVERY OF THE SELF /
    S..E.L.F. /
    CONSISTENCY & MINDFULNESS
    of which i l ear ned from h ear t
    pain - challenges
    w LIFE ,, im ready and able to share
    FOR HUMANS TO MARS
    not to b on my own only
    ( no one owns their breaths )
    BUT ALSO W U = YES U
    1 in our
    H,- EART - H
    THAT HAS NO CHALLENGES
    WILL BE WAITING FOR THE
    RETURN

  • @donaldjonesgonzalez2761
    @donaldjonesgonzalez2761 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    NASA suspended; not approved! sorry;🦊

  • @debraallen63
    @debraallen63 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Space may be the Final Frontier but it's Made in a Hollywood Basement.
    No truer words ever sang!!!

    • @Jmacdonald2386
      @Jmacdonald2386 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh wow that’s it! You’ve cracked the conspiracy! 🙄

    • @debraallen63
      @debraallen63 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Jmacdonald2386 I think Thomas Dolby did That with his "Flat Earth" CD years ago.
      The Truth of Flat Earth is in movies, TV shows, music and thrown in your face Everyday and you still are to blind to See it.
      All those actWhores have you Enslaved in their Lies.
      If the Truth MAKES you Free then SURELY the lack thereof MAKES you a Slave.
      Put your Slave Mask on 😷 and Obey that Tel-LIE-vision!!!!
      Zombies 😷💉😷💉😷

    • @carcinogen60yearsago
      @carcinogen60yearsago 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Still better than you in your mom's basement.

    • @debraallen63
      @debraallen63 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@carcinogen60yearsago I'm a 60 year old homeless Grandma.
      Truth is where Freedom Lives, if you don't Seek it you'll remain a Slave to the Lies.
      God bless 🙏

  • @richlo8887
    @richlo8887 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's also the most over budget rocket that's already outdated! 🤣
    SpaceX Starship....it's the only choice!

    • @_mikolaj_
      @_mikolaj_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If its the only choice....
      Where is it? Bcuz i dont see it anywhere as a valid option atm

    • @richlo8887
      @richlo8887 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@_mikolaj_ Mark April on your calendar, sunshine!

    • @_mikolaj_
      @_mikolaj_ ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richlo8887 its been "soon" for almost 2 years. At this point Ill believe a launch date when FAA releases launch license.
      Besides, vehicle in boca chica is nowhere near to the operational system that could launch any satelite or perform in space propellant transfer, let alone, send people to space and trough lunar transfer.
      And finally, quoting NASA, "Such architecture just wouldn't work". Why? Beacuse starship even fully filled doesnt have enaugh propellant to go to the moon, land, and return to earth.

    • @richlo8887
      @richlo8887 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@_mikolaj_ It's been soon since November, my guy. Stop exaggerating. It's coming next month! As for the rest of your but, but, but's.....all will be fully operational by years end...including orbital refueling, so Staship can go ANYWHERE! 😉

    • @_mikolaj_
      @_mikolaj_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@richlo8887 first flight date was 2020.
      Later, for over 2 years it was 2 months away quoting certain funny guy on twitter.
      Thats not "since november".
      As for the rest, look im no NASA but they seem experienced with rockets. If they say certain architecture just doesnt work out with the numbers, ill trust them.

  • @jaysgood10
    @jaysgood10 ปีที่แล้ว

    How the heck is NASA going to use that capsule to go around the moon when it couldn’t even make it around the earth last year?

    • @TraditionalAnglican
      @TraditionalAnglican ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You’re talking about 2 different capsules - This is Orion. The one that couldn’t make it into orbit & had 82 faults (3 of which could’ve killed anyone aboard) was Starliner.

    • @jaysgood10
      @jaysgood10 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TraditionalAnglican Boeing built both?

    • @MeerkatADV
      @MeerkatADV ปีที่แล้ว

      You realize they've already sent one around the moon right? Google Artemis 1.

  • @individualone
    @individualone ปีที่แล้ว +2

    😳what's changed? We've already sent astronauts to the moon🤔😩🤦‍♂️

    • @individualone
      @individualone ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Raheel Jafri if we already went why should we need water at any pole?

    • @individualone
      @individualone ปีที่แล้ว

      @Raheel Jafri I'll try this again. If we've already been to the moon with 1960s tech why is it more complicated now?

    • @tpresto9862
      @tpresto9862 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@individualone Longer duration visits to the moon were not possible with Apollo technology. Plus the allowable risk to life was not as strict in the 1960s. That's why 1960s astronauts were all military test pilots; being a test pilot in the 1960s was already an inherently dangerous job with a couple dozen test pilots being killed on the job every year. Today the allowable risks are much more strict -- and safer space hardware means totally new space hardware.
      And. like I said, the old technology allowed for a maximum mission duration of 2 weeks (and that was pushing it). They now eventually want missions lasting longer than that.

    • @_mikolaj_
      @_mikolaj_ ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@individualonebeacuse in 60s they did it at massive costs(yes being more expensive annually than SLS is not hard in 60s) and they didnt know of many dangers
      It was a wild ride that wouldnt pass modern safety standards
      Also production lines from these times do not exist. So you must go from scratch. And if you are doing it from scratch why not do it better?

    • @individualone
      @individualone ปีที่แล้ว

      @@_mikolaj_ 😩🤦‍♂️if you except that🤷‍♂️go ahead get rained on, [ it's actually piss] 🤷‍♂️

  • @genebohannon8820
    @genebohannon8820 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do they have a basket from space, no. That is probably why one astronaut already bailed on this shit show!

  • @-TheMaskedMan-
    @-TheMaskedMan- ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey why not talk about some space movies like Avatar way of water or the new “65” movie coming out? Talk about the tech etc 😂. Its all space based.

    • @godslayer1415
      @godslayer1415 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Avatar 2 is a complete and total turd - took 20 years for that?

    • @-TheMaskedMan-
      @-TheMaskedMan- ปีที่แล้ว

      @@godslayer1415 But it’s in the top 3 best selling movies on the planet 😞. As one space fan to another, “ aren’t you a bit curious as to what lies beyond?” If your answer is “yes” then you will understand what Avatar truly is. It’s literally human curiosity manifested in a way for everyone to understand. Our destiny lies beyond the stars.

    • @warcrimemenace6292
      @warcrimemenace6292 ปีที่แล้ว

      This channel is about space related news, these literally have to be from real life because otherwise they arent news, that would be fiction. avatar even tho its space related doesnt have anything to do with the content that is here

    • @peternystrom921
      @peternystrom921 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@godslayer1415lol never thought i would see an incel in a video about space travel.

  • @keithb7981
    @keithb7981 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep in mind going is not a reliable rocket an aerospace company it never was really it was a very reliable aircraft developer and Builder, but since the buyout / merger with McDonald Douglas everything about Boeing and its operation went down the toilet. For some reason Boeing immediately began implementing failed operating practices that were responsible for the end of McDonald Douglas and worse they allowed former high-ups from Douglas to make major decisions under bowling they fired and forced retired much of the senior Boeing engineering staff, and then began wholesale Doling out of manufacturing who as yet unreliable and unproven subcontractors and Sub of subcontractor. This is why Starliner is an utter abysmal failure other than a means to siphon off taxpayer money. No one should consider Boeing either an aerospace company or a reliable Corporation.. Boeing is not anyting even remotely on the scale of Boeing that designed the 747 which became the most common and reliable aircraft in civil commercial Aviation history. That Boeing is dead and gone.

  • @dannypope1860
    @dannypope1860 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can’t believe that after all this, a year from now, they only do a fly bye…
    WHAT A JOKE!

  • @sbanitaba2506
    @sbanitaba2506 ปีที่แล้ว

    WHENWELAUGHVRPEACEGLOBAL !!
    GOOD DAY .
    Sharing to c all of your smiles , youtube
    phone home - E. T. remixed
    toy story ( 1995 ) -
    woody & buzz use sids rocket
    to fly
    buzz //
    > next stop andy
    > we re not aiming for the truck
    >>>>>>>>
    not selling anything =
    Love when i smile ,, u 2 .