Mistakes in what Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi (national spokesperson of Bharatiya Janata Party) said about Kepler's theory of Planetary motion and Navagraha worship in Hinduism - Kepler never said there were nine planets in Solar system and Kepler and his contemporaries never knew about the planets Uranus, Neptune and Pluto (which was later declassified as a planet and re-labeled as a "dwarf planet"). Second - the Navagraha worship in Hinduism has little to no relation with the modern day knowledge about the Solar system. The Nav Grahas are Surya (Sun), Chandra (Moon), Budha (Mercury), Mangal (Mars), Shani (Saturn), Guru (Jupiter), Shukra (Venus), Rahu and Ketu. First of all the Samskrutham word "Graha" doesn't necessarily mean a "planet" - it means "something which influences". It is from this root the word "anugraha" comes from. In this context "Graha" means "a heavenly body that influence our lives". That's why it forms the basis of Jyotisha shastra. Now to the mistake in equating Nav grahas to Solar system. The sun and moon forms part of the Nava grahas in which the sun is a star and the moon is a natural satellite i.e. both are not planets. The planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Saturn and Jupiter which is included in the Nava Graha pantheon need not be observed by a telescope. These planets are easily observable by the naked eyes at certain times from the earth. So these planets being included in Nava Grahas by our ancestors was simply natural and there's no big achievement in it. Now coming to Rahu and Ketu - both of these are mystical celestial bodies mentioned in the Puranik texts which are believed to cause the solar and lunar eclipses, however according to modern astronomy the eclipses are caused by the shadows of the earth and the moon and no third celestial body is involved in it. Plus the existence of Rahu and Ketu cannot be scientifically proven and they remain mere religious beliefs.
There seems to be some confusion in the video. The narrator claims that the asteroid which struck Earth millions of years ago led to the formation of Mars as we see it today. This is incorrect. Instead, scientific evidence suggests that a massive collision between a Mars-sized body (Theia) and the early Earth around 4.5 billion years ago resulted in the formation of the Moon, not Mars. The claim made in the video is therefore false, as Mars is a separate planet that formed independently during the early stages of the solar system’s development. 6:50
Hi Acadawn team😊, I love the content you share! I would like to suggest a topic for your channel: 'What are the qualities or signs of a good girl who is suitable for marriage?' It would be great to hear your thoughts on this. Keep up the amazing work❤
from my perspective, the mistake in the sudhanshu trivedi's speech is that mars was not created from earth instead, it was created by protoplanetary disc around the sun (earth just helped in shaping it)
3:46 broooooooooo you NAILED ITTT..... literally mere dimaag mai yhi reel chal rhi hai last 3 days se scroll up pe aayi thi... Or mai isko proper adjust nhi kr paa rha tha..!! 5:15 exactly 9:50 exactly 💯 11:30 bro what about Dubai??
I think, & I might be wrong but the jhol in Sudhanshu Dwivedi's video is that no single person has ever been credited for the discovery of all the 9 planets, I mean 8 currently.... Because discovery of planets has taken place throughout the history by different people & mostly through observation. So, Until the development of the telescope in the early 1600s, all astronomical observations were made with the naked eye. When Galileo Galilei turned his telescope to the sky in 1609, planetary astronomy became a new and different science and some planets had been discovered by astronomers.
Veg aur non veg khane walo mai aantar hai sach sabko pata hai ki janwar markar khana galat hai bt fir bhi logg khate hain waise log kathor non empathy se bhar jate waise aadmi hinsak ho jata hai aur hinsa jab tk janwar mai nikal rhi hai tab tk thik pr kisi din vo kisi insan pr bhi hinsa karega
😂😂😂bhai mera ek dost hai wo pure veg aur brahman hai abhi jail me hai kyuki gunda tha Aur ek doosra non veg wala dost hai jo thoda gandu to hai but use accha Banda khi ni milega
The navagraha are nine heavenly bodies and deities that influence human life on Earth according to Hinduism and Hindu mythology.[1] The term is derived from nava (Sanskrit: नव "nine") and graha (Sanskrit: ग्रह "planet, seizing, laying hold of, holding"). The nine parts of the navagraha are the Sun, Moon, planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, and the two nodes of the Moon.[2] article from wikipedia jo btata hai india ne khoj toh kr li thi but was not perfect kyunki unhone sun or moon ko bhi add kr lia tha or earth ko neglect kr dia tha . 2nd theory : how mars formed ? A Mars-sized body, often referred to as Theia, collided with the early Earth during the late stages of planetary formation. But this was the reason behind formation of moon but not mars. 1st claim is somewhere true and but second claim is false that's what i conclude.
6:12 the planet theia collided to earth and form the moon not mars science support this theory not said by sudhanshu trivedy said😂😅❤ If am i right pls pin me❤ I completed my homework😅😅
6:26 There are many other civilizations such Greek, Egyptian and Hindu who knew about 5 or 6 planets also the 9 Grah are not all planets it has sun and 2 phases of moon so ancient Hindus also knew about 6 planets only that too due to clear night sky and watch them for 1000s of years, Kepler was not the one who told about 9 planets no one knows who came up with also some people say that the devi was the one who told Ramanujan mathematical equations in his dreams sir Ramanujan was great but that doesn't mean that it was a devi who did it newton said that Jesus will have a second coming but no scientist ever commented on his religious stuff and focused on his scientific knowledge why are we so focused on sir Ramanujan's religion if that is how it is in that sense most of the scientists are Christians and jew so is there religion is the true one? scientific understanding has nothing to do with ATHEISTS, HINDUS, CHRISTIANS, MUSLIMS ....etc the one who gives theories are scientists not athiest,hindus,chritians etc..
1st Point: It's not just about the mention of six planets, but the depth and detail in which they were described. While Greek and Egyptian sources mention five planets visible to the naked eye (Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn), Indian astronomy uniquely details the characteristics of each planet (e.g., referring to Mars as Bhumi Putra). Contrary to the popular belief that Indian astronomy was influenced by Greek thought, this is logically untenable-how could something that predates another be influenced by it? I won’t delve deeper into the merits of Indian astronomy, but I encourage you to explore texts like the Surya Siddhanta and Vedānga Jyotiṣa for a better understanding. 2nd Point: You’re completely misguided on this point-the case for Newton and Ramanuja is entirely different . Newton developed a complete theory supported by mathematical formulas, practical observations, and experimentation, which earned him fame. In contrast, Ramanujan lacked a formal theoretical framework to explain his results; he simply presented answers without providing reasoning or proof. Think of it like solving nearly 3,900 (actual amount of results provided by Ramanujan) complex problems without ever studying the subject-many of which are still unproven yet find direct practical applications. Any rational person would naturally wonder about the source of such extraordinary insight. Could this really be attributed to mere intuition or luck? Surely not.
@@samridhsethi8708 what u are unable to understand is that it can be intuition or it can be something else it dosent necessarily have to be devi ma i took issac newtons example to show u that in whole human history people have repeatedly said something like this and claimed the jesus did it,allah did it or devi ma did it we should focus on there work if devi ma really told equations to ramanujan y all of his work are not correct like the prime no. formula any rational person would think that if there litrally is a higher power how the heck is it sometimes wrong and sometimes right coz it might not be higher power but strong human intellect which can be wrong and right many time ok let me tell you another example August Kekulé claimed to have discovered the structure of the benzene molecule after dreaming of a snake seizing its own tail (an image resembling the Ouroboros) now tell me who is saying truth newton who developed a complete theory and believed in jesus (some were correct some were not), sir ramanujan who dreamed of devi ma bleeding equations (some were correct some were not) or august abt oroborus?? you have actually just seen sir ramanujans claim abt goddess and are a hindu so you think that it must be devi ma but accross the history there have been same cases like ramanujan where people did something extraordinary and gave the credit to a mystic power like litrally 1000s of cases we cannot say for certain is it devi ma, jesus or allah but what might be the most logical case is that these people were extremly smart and didn't knew where did this come from and gave credit to SOMEONE/SOMETHING THEY BELIEVED TO BE THE MOST TRUE but know one actually for it to be true so that is we as third person say that it was there great intuition coz had it been a higher power it would only tell correct theories only but all of them newton, ramanujana and august were wrong many times
@@samridhsethi8708 and how could u not know that ramanujan was known for his intuition and u say mere intuition? bruh ramanujans intuition was next level and human intuition no matter how great often fails same with ramanujans many errors
@@samridhsethi8708 and plz also explore this area of science from mystism you will know how scientist claim that father, mother in dream told them theories we often think that ramanujan due to his intuition was mystic in contrary he was just one of many who gave credits of his intellect to what he had faith in
Where is the real guy we all are here for Who are you No Good voice or Charm You are a shame on society Nothing much to enjoy in your Way of speaking Speak Like that Other guy He is the reason This channel is still alive
Mars alag nhi hua alag to moon hua tha or vo to sukra ko mante hai earth ka judwa Or kapler ne inke name nhi diye capler ka jo law hai vo kebal motion batata hai planets ke name nhi batata😂
At 9:50 the point doesn't make any sense . If country is atheist does mean that it is happy , you take example of japan and Dubai. They have strict law . Its same as the bjp guy one lies and one truth
Haar dharam mai chutiya hote h but uske chakkar mai pura dharam aur vishwas ko chutiya nhi khta . Unka religion mai jo shikaya jyta h vo matter krta most of the time .
First I really love this channel for presenting their content with utmost sincerity, seriousness followed by sarcasm in between!
They were providing content, we really need 🎉 Thank you #Acadawn group ❤
No mix masala only bitter truth 🙂
Mistakes in what Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi (national spokesperson of Bharatiya Janata Party) said about Kepler's theory of Planetary motion and Navagraha worship in Hinduism - Kepler never said there were nine planets in Solar system and Kepler and his contemporaries never knew about the planets Uranus, Neptune and Pluto (which was later declassified as a planet and re-labeled as a "dwarf planet"). Second - the Navagraha worship in Hinduism has little to no relation with the modern day knowledge about the Solar system. The Nav Grahas are Surya (Sun), Chandra (Moon), Budha (Mercury), Mangal (Mars), Shani (Saturn), Guru (Jupiter), Shukra (Venus), Rahu and Ketu. First of all the Samskrutham word "Graha" doesn't necessarily mean a "planet" - it means "something which influences". It is from this root the word "anugraha" comes from. In this context "Graha" means "a heavenly body that influence our lives". That's why it forms the basis of Jyotisha shastra. Now to the mistake in equating Nav grahas to Solar system. The sun and moon forms part of the Nava grahas in which the sun is a star and the moon is a natural satellite i.e. both are not planets. The planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Saturn and Jupiter which is included in the Nava Graha pantheon need not be observed by a telescope. These planets are easily observable by the naked eyes at certain times from the earth. So these planets being included in Nava Grahas by our ancestors was simply natural and there's no big achievement in it. Now coming to Rahu and Ketu - both of these are mystical celestial bodies mentioned in the Puranik texts which are believed to cause the solar and lunar eclipses, however according to modern astronomy the eclipses are caused by the shadows of the earth and the moon and no third celestial body is involved in it. Plus the existence of Rahu and Ketu cannot be scientifically proven and they remain mere religious beliefs.
😮😮😮
verry phenomenally eye opening channel I felt very grateful to see that there are some people who think like us
Very informative video sir thanks
Best video ❤❤
Mannn this damn channel provides top notch content
Part 3 ❤😊
THINK AGAIN 🔥
Superb content bro just one suggestion also cover about survivorship bias as well if not already covered somewhere
No worry bro ✌️ u look good thank you for your video
There seems to be some confusion in the video. The narrator claims that the asteroid which struck Earth millions of years ago led to the formation of Mars as we see it today. This is incorrect. Instead, scientific evidence suggests that a massive collision between a Mars-sized body (Theia) and the early Earth around 4.5 billion years ago resulted in the formation of the Moon, not Mars.
The claim made in the video is therefore false, as Mars is a separate planet that formed independently during the early stages of the solar system’s development. 6:50
Thanx for info Myy G
thanks for removing the confusion
More videos like this
Hi Acadawn team😊,
I love the content you share!
I would like to suggest a topic for your channel:
'What are the qualities or signs of a good girl who is suitable for marriage?'
It would be great to hear your thoughts on this.
Keep up the amazing work❤
from my perspective, the mistake in the sudhanshu trivedi's speech is that mars was not created from earth instead, it was created by protoplanetary disc around the sun (earth just helped in shaping it)
3:46 broooooooooo you NAILED ITTT.....
literally mere dimaag mai yhi reel chal rhi hai last 3 days se scroll up pe aayi thi... Or mai isko proper adjust nhi kr paa rha tha..!!
5:15 exactly
9:50 exactly 💯
11:30 bro what about Dubai??
Dubai kya😊
@Shaikhfarhan-js6hc dubai mai safety r@pe cases bhot kamm h muslims rule krte h..!
Because of strict law ,
I think, & I might be wrong but the jhol in Sudhanshu Dwivedi's video is that no single person has ever been credited for the discovery of all the 9 planets, I mean 8 currently.... Because discovery of planets has taken place throughout the history by different people & mostly through observation. So, Until the development of the telescope in the early 1600s, all astronomical observations were made with the naked eye. When Galileo Galilei turned his telescope to the sky in 1609, planetary astronomy became a new and different science and some planets had been discovered by astronomers.
Hlo brother your content is fantastic 😍
I love to watch your content daily besis 🎉
Veg aur non veg khane walo mai aantar hai sach sabko pata hai ki janwar markar khana galat hai bt fir bhi logg khate hain waise log kathor non empathy se bhar jate waise aadmi hinsak ho jata hai aur hinsa jab tk janwar mai nikal rhi hai tab tk thik pr kisi din vo kisi insan pr bhi hinsa karega
😂😂
😂😂😂bhai mera ek dost hai wo pure veg aur brahman hai abhi jail me hai kyuki gunda tha
Aur ek doosra non veg wala dost hai jo thoda gandu to hai but use accha Banda khi ni milega
The navagraha are nine heavenly bodies and deities that influence human life on Earth according to Hinduism and Hindu mythology.[1] The term is derived from nava (Sanskrit: नव "nine") and graha (Sanskrit: ग्रह "planet, seizing, laying hold of, holding"). The nine parts of the navagraha are the Sun, Moon, planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, and the two nodes of the Moon.[2] article from wikipedia jo btata hai india ne khoj toh kr li thi but was not perfect kyunki unhone sun or moon ko bhi add kr lia tha or earth ko neglect kr dia tha .
2nd theory : how mars formed ?
A Mars-sized body, often referred to as Theia, collided with the early Earth during the late stages of planetary formation.
But this was the reason behind formation of moon but not mars.
1st claim is somewhere true and but second claim is false that's what i conclude.
Can you explain ☯️ taoism in detail. Because no one has explain taoism correctly expect osho
Pls make more videos on critical thinking
Bhai apka monarch vali website nahi khul rahi 🙄
Mangal ny Chand bana tha
Subscribed🎉
Can you attach some studies or research papers you have talked about in the video?
thank you but where is the first part?
❤❤❤
Thank you
6:12 the planet theia collided to earth and form the moon not mars science support this theory not said by sudhanshu trivedy said😂😅❤
If am i right pls pin me❤
I completed my homework😅😅
6:26 There are many other civilizations such Greek, Egyptian and Hindu who knew about 5 or 6 planets also the 9 Grah are not all planets it has sun and 2 phases of moon so ancient Hindus also knew about 6 planets only that too due to clear night sky and watch them for 1000s of years, Kepler was not the one who told about 9 planets no one knows who came up with
also some people say that the devi was the one who told Ramanujan mathematical equations in his dreams sir Ramanujan was great but that doesn't mean that it was a devi who did it newton said that Jesus will have a second coming but no scientist ever commented on his religious stuff and focused on his scientific knowledge why are we so focused on sir Ramanujan's religion if that is how it is in that sense most of the scientists are Christians and jew so is there religion is the true one? scientific understanding has nothing to do with ATHEISTS, HINDUS, CHRISTIANS, MUSLIMS ....etc the one who gives theories are scientists not athiest,hindus,chritians etc..
Bro you give me new vision to think but also see my ans
1st Point:
It's not just about the mention of six planets, but the depth and detail in which they were described. While Greek and Egyptian sources mention five planets visible to the naked eye (Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn), Indian astronomy uniquely details the characteristics of each planet (e.g., referring to Mars as Bhumi Putra). Contrary to the popular belief that Indian astronomy was influenced by Greek thought, this is logically untenable-how could something that predates another be influenced by it? I won’t delve deeper into the merits of Indian astronomy, but I encourage you to explore texts like the Surya Siddhanta and Vedānga Jyotiṣa for a better understanding.
2nd Point:
You’re completely misguided on this point-the case for Newton and Ramanuja is entirely different . Newton developed a complete theory supported by mathematical formulas, practical observations, and experimentation, which earned him fame. In contrast, Ramanujan lacked a formal theoretical framework to explain his results; he simply presented answers without providing reasoning or proof. Think of it like solving nearly 3,900 (actual amount of results provided by Ramanujan) complex problems without ever studying the subject-many of which are still unproven yet find direct practical applications. Any rational person would naturally wonder about the source of such extraordinary insight. Could this really be attributed to mere intuition or luck? Surely not.
@@samridhsethi8708 what u are unable to understand is that it can be intuition or it can be something else it dosent necessarily have to be devi ma i took issac newtons example to show u that in whole human history people have repeatedly said something like this and claimed the jesus did it,allah did it or devi ma did it we should focus on there work if devi ma really told equations to ramanujan y all of his work are not correct like the prime no. formula any rational person would think that if there litrally is a higher power how the heck is it sometimes wrong and sometimes right coz it might not be higher power but strong human intellect which can be wrong and right many time ok let me tell you another example August Kekulé claimed to have discovered the structure of the benzene molecule after dreaming of a snake seizing its own tail (an image resembling the Ouroboros) now tell me who is saying truth newton who developed a complete theory and believed in jesus (some were correct some were not), sir ramanujan who dreamed of devi ma bleeding equations (some were correct some were not) or august abt oroborus?? you have actually just seen sir ramanujans claim abt goddess and are a hindu so you think that it must be devi ma but accross the history there have been same cases like ramanujan where people did something extraordinary and gave the credit to a mystic power like litrally 1000s of cases we cannot say for certain is it devi ma, jesus or allah but what might be the most logical case is that these people were extremly smart and didn't knew where did this come from and gave credit to SOMEONE/SOMETHING THEY BELIEVED TO BE THE MOST TRUE but know one actually for it to be true so that is we as third person say that it was there great intuition coz had it been a higher power it would only tell correct theories only but all of them newton, ramanujana and august were wrong many times
@@samridhsethi8708 and how could u not know that ramanujan was known for his intuition and u say mere intuition? bruh ramanujans intuition was next level and human intuition no matter how great often fails same with ramanujans many errors
@@samridhsethi8708 and plz also explore this area of science from mystism you will know how scientist claim that father, mother in dream told them theories we often think that ramanujan due to his intuition was mystic in contrary he was just one of many who gave credits of his intellect to what he had faith in
7:07 Mars is not part of earth it is a part of sun😄
Where is the real guy we all are here for
Who are you No Good voice or Charm
You are a shame on society
Nothing much to enjoy in your
Way of speaking
Speak Like that Other guy
He is the reason This channel is still alive
9:27 challenge
part 3
How many people are working for this channel makes me think critically.🤔🤔
Kya analysis nikli phir ??
Please provide Pdfs of these researchs 👤
Mars alag nhi hua alag to moon hua tha or vo to sukra ko mante hai earth ka judwa
Or kapler ne inke name nhi diye capler ka jo law hai vo kebal motion batata hai planets ke name nhi batata😂
Rahu ketu wala part😂😂😂
Mangal ❌ 🌝 ✅
Appreciated
Full video dekhne wale❤--------
First comment
Kepler give the law of planetary motion, not how many planets around the sun 😑
👇
Dusra bhai = King Kanishk 😅
Where is the old guy..😢
At 9:50 the point doesn't make any sense . If country is atheist does mean that it is happy , you take example of japan and Dubai. They have strict law . Its same as the bjp guy one lies and one truth
Haar dharam mai chutiya hote h but uske chakkar mai pura dharam aur vishwas ko chutiya nhi khta . Unka religion mai jo shikaya jyta h vo matter krta most of the time .
Where is other guy?
who r u where is the other guy
Bhaichara on top
Tumhe content se mtlb h ki insaan se
😂😂😂😂😂
Bro there are two guys in this channel
Who are you ?
Bhago apne desh 😂
Where is the another guy
You have read that book , didn't you... "THE R*DEST..."
Bhai tujhse ache se explain nahi hua
First guy
😂bhai just feedback try to use the course the other guy sell no hate..
Hello
Kya ye aadmi alag aadmi hai ya wahi aadmi hai jo mai confuse hu vo aadmi kaha hai jo aur v vaisa hai 🥴
Kanishk nam h uskA
Bhai ye kon bhai hai dusra bhai kaha hai
Dont make 3 part😂 ye to 1 vidio me bta diye hai indirectly
Kyaa Matlab