Hardware VS Software.. // Why Go Dawless?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ค. 2024
- Hardware VS Software, who is the winner to you?
Use this link for a 2 month free trial: skl.sh/rickytinez
Synth Merch - www.synthshit.com
// Let's Connect
Instagram - / ricky_tinez
My Music (Most is free!) - rickytinez.bandcamp.com/
Soundcloud - / rickytinez
Spotify - open.spotify.com/artist/43aZ5...
open.spotify.com/artist/2DvaN...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Everything I Film With
My Camera - amzn.to/2BpU3WD
My Lens - amzn.to/2BoSDM9
My Mic - amzn.to/2WPiRQO
// Gear Used
Favorite Headphones - amzn.to/2Byszww
Recorder - amzn.to/2AeJpCq
Cables - amzn.to/2D3h189
//If i was stuck on an island i'd take this..
kit.com/EnriqueMartinez/if-i-...
//Contact
EnriqueMMusic@gmail.com - เพลง
![ตั๋วเมีย( ຕົວະເມຍ) - SOMBATH.97 Ft. YOUD SALAVAN [ Official music video ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GV6qHagpp50/mqdefault.jpg)
youtube captions changed “go dawless” to “go dollars”... still accurate
Clef is Futile why go Dallas?
@@piercemcintyre1327 Because the food there is great. Lol
Arranging things in the dog sounds really painful.
@@ThatBonsaipanda I think it also requires that one be a licensed veterinarian.
"Why go, dollars?" ... because gear
Hardware = Tactile expression of ideas.
DAW = Recording, Arranging, Mixing and Archiving said ideas.
Get a MPC LIVE!! =)
@@yourmom9828 Why? I have an MPC 1000, ASR-X, Digitakt, SP404SX and SP2400 OTW...
Well said. Have both!
@@yourmom9828 MPC1000 > every sequencer/sampler ever
His name was Bill Batson. Well said.
I like hardware because when I sit in front of computer my creativity dies, cause I'm already using computer a lot, for work and entertainment, and I need a different environment for making creative stuff. Also I dislike endless possibilities of software, I don't know what to do with it. Finishing songs with it though proves very useful.
Yea, this is the way I feel as well. I am a software developer and its my job to bang away on a computer, googling problems and dealing with issues. A Daw always sends me down a tech related black hole where the musical inspiration disappears.
Maybe you should record standing up in front of a PC. Know it sounds stupid but it works for me. But I use all of native instruments stuff including their controller. I use Ableton to record
I totally get it. I’m ENTIRELY Daw-based currently (I mostly compose orchestral/orchestral-hybrid), but I’m starting work on a jazz-fusion album, and I’m finding I’m getting bogged down with the software synths I’m using. (And I’ve got some good ones, lol.) I now feel I need something more hands-on, at least part of the time. But the bigger problem seems to be that “endless-options” issue when it comes to software instruments. (I recently heard it put as “options paralysis,” lol.)
same
same being infront of a computer 8 hours a day as a graphic designer doesnt encourage me to be infront of screens more! Loving my sp404 but I know I need MPC Live to get more polished finish
I think a lot of it these days has to do with screen overload. Maybe 15 - 20 years ago laptops were the biz, no one had phones, social media didn’t exist. Today, hardware gives u a break from using a screen all day long whether that’s for work, communication or entertainment. That’s what I get out of it, I think it’s why so many are drawn to modular, too.
But a lot faceless setup still have screen and depend on it, I haven't have a music setup and interested in the DirtyWave M8 Tracker but think about it, might as well just learn from Garageband and Logic Pro
i think that’s what’s been drawing me into DAWless production too, i’m learning how to use a roland sp404sx and am going to pair it with a VS840 so i do not need software if i so please
Music with ears
Edits with eyes
Mixing with... coffee
Mastering with time
Man you must have one hell of a electricity bill.
no joke... i do.. haha
Why is that ? With everything engaged its probably doesn't top 1-2 kw/h (for example very power hungry laptops eat 150w max, desktops up to 400w, everything else about 0.2a - 0.5a * 110V = 20-50w. Its a good practice too keep stuff sectioned in sections. For example editing job does take 2 monitors and a set of speakers/phones, mixing calls for proper soundsystem, writing with po's and volcas - well you need a table for that, midi rig is another "station" (just put power switch on your rack and connect everything in the rack thru that switch).
Anyway, onewater boiler, electric kettle for your daily coffee fix or electric heater takes way more power.
mic indir go home bro 🤫😴
@@lloydc1092 I'm home
I noticed that too once I started getting gear.
me: How many devices will I need to replace my DAW
you: Don't look behind me
It's 3am 😂😂
You can do basically everything you can in your DAW of choice in an MPC or Roland MV-8000 / MV-8800 (or Kronos / Fantom / Motif).
@@mc2engineeringprof no you can't...did you ever touched analog filter??Did you hear it scream like a little girl...thats what daw can't do
@@MrXamanX DAWs are, fundamentally, for recording of audio. How you process that audio (and what kind of filters or sources or whatever you use) PRIOR to going into the DAW is up to you and has no impact on the DAW. The DAW doesn't care what you did to the audio before you digitized it. The DAW, at the most basic level, is the thing that handles it AFTER you digitize it. At that point, any professional DAW will handle your audio roughly the same provided that you have a good interface with good da ad converters.
1.
an OP-1
9:33 "The limitations that hardware create, manifest creativity within them."
I couldn't agree more. For me at least, the endless possibilities of the DAW completely stifle my creative drive. Precisely BECAUSE anything and everything is possible.
I completely resonate with your point about wanting things to feel more tactile / hands-on.
I'm a drummer and bass guitarist, but have the same issues with fellow musicians as you described, never really feeling at home in the conventional (rock/metal) band setting.
I have used Logic Pro X, Ableton Live, Fruity Loops, and Reason, but the general concept of making music through a computer just feels alien to me. Even after roughly 15 years of trying to get into it again and again.
I just want to PERFORM organically (meaning the spontaniety, not necessarily in front of an audience).
Never had enough money until I got older to have hardware. It's re-ignited my creative passion for music, especially sound synthesis.
BUT the DAW is my recording studio in a box. Like you said, it's how you take a performance and a cluster of ideas and polish them into a finished project.
It's a rock band jamming in the studio and the producer using those jam sessions to craft a track that makes it onto the album.
I do not claim one side or the other. You can have *BOTH*. ❤️❤️
i completely agree, if everyone is using the same modular system and the same rehashed tehcnology that has been around for years, everyone is going to sound the same, each person needs to find what works for them, its not a one size fits all situation...
💯
Electronisounds Audio Shut up Dean 👊🏽😂. Where’s your Black Friday sale ? ☝🏽🤓
@@KarzenX Sorry, no Black Friday sale(s) this year. 👊
No.
"Hardware or software?"
"Yes"
I started on software but quickly switched over to hardware. I need a limitation to fuel my creativity. With hardware I feel like I'm learning and improving more.
Go that or these is like go black or white.
Hell, no.
Go hybrid , respect your wallet, choose your weapons of choice, and don t care about the hype...
"Go what fits you"!
That's what I got currently. So many tools and so many REALLY good ones too
@@ChurroLightyear Nice man me too. Aquired a MK3 and SP404SX and MPC1000 within a year. Time to do less buying and more playing hahahaaa
TRUE. THE MIDDLE WAY. PLUS MOST FOLKS WOULD SWOON THAT USE A JD-XI(A HYBRID TECHNOLOGIES ANALOGUE/DIGITAL SYNTH)
clem klm exactly!
Go purple or orange. Beats grayscale every time.
Why not have both? Never understood this argument.
INGENUK for me I just can’t get any motivation to work on music as soon as I get front of a computer.
@@tyroneshoelacez3498 See, I am often the opposite of that. The moment I'm on my computer, I often do everything but what I went on there to do. For example, why am I on TH-cam right now typing this comment when I should be working on my next song?
Jagilsdorf oops I just edited that.. I can’t get any motivation when I’m on the computer! Ok turning off iPhone and going into studio. 👍
OK Boomer.
@@rustikinc63 I wish programs like Reason, Logic, Pro Tools and ESPECIALLY Ableton would come out with a computer that ONLY runs that DAW. Like a Chromebook for producers.
It’s the tactile stimulation we get from touching the knobs, faders and keys/drum pads that connect us with the music. Same as plucking a string or holding a drumstick. It all allows us to project emotion and feeling into the music.
Thanks for having this talk, there is something magical to recordings done by ear. Out of the box.
I have a bit of a "tactile DAW" setup at the moment. Most of the synths that I use are Arturia Products, so I have a Keylab midi controller that lets me tweak parameters with my hands and my ears rather than my eyes. For mixing, I have a Softube Console One, where I try to do most of my EQ'ing and level balancing. For my workflow (and my wallet) it works really well to be able to have the flexibility and advanced features of a DAW, but still to use my ears over my eyes when I get down to sound design and mixing.
My journey sounds a lot like yours but only gets to about 2:45. I'm looking forward to continue to get more and more DAWless.
Grab a knob, grab another knob and uhhhng?
Just went through that a few months back. Found a great middle ground in the Maschine MK3 and Maschine Jam. Creating in there and then finishing everything, polishing in Ableton
As long as you can make something dope, it doesn’t matter how you get there. I use both vintage analog gear as well in the 📦, depends on my mood. Great post man, keep em coming.
*For me it's about being connected to the music, the immediacy and flow. I don't like using the mouse and screen to make music and I don't want to sit in a chair, I want to move to the music and use both hands, and my ears more than my eyes, I don't want to be distracted by what I see, that prevents making subconscious decisions based on hearing and feeling because our visual sense is so strong, it will override other senses.*
*But also hardware has its own strengths and weaknesses..*
I wish programs like Reason, Logic, Pro Tools and ESPECIALLY Ableton would come out with a computer that ONLY runs that DAW. Like a Chromebook for producers.
Like playstation for games
@Boofsquad *how do you mean?*
@Boofsquad *I'm not rejecting the mouse and screen for ego reasons or "just because", but for those workflow reasons I outlined above. In fact, of course I want to use the tool that works the best FOR ME, and fact: The mouse is horrible for turning knobs, the fine motor precision is not there and you get RSI when operating the mouse standing up, also you can only turn one knob at a time with the mouse, but you don't even get any haptic feedback, you have to use your eyes to make sure that you actually grab the knob correctly. And try doing a techno live performance with a mouse when the desk is vibrating! Hell naw!*
*But also in the studio, for other editing tasks the mouse is inferior, it has very low bandwidth compared to what you can do with two hands on physical user interfaces.*
*Regarding limiting myself: Art is ALL about self imposed limits, get real! I chose my limits how I like them, so my art is different from others. That's how it should be! I don't let the DAW or mouse impose those limits on me, in fact I wrote my own software for live music performance, improvisation and composition, that combines the best of hardware's and software's strengths and brings the analog work FLOW into the digital domain! And I'm very happy with that, not using a mouse and screen, choosing my own limitations and implementing my own features that DAWs don't even have!*
*And it can be used to orchestrate up to 16 hardware or software synths. I'm not sure yet if I should try to sell it, because for normies it'd be a steep learning curve, like flying an airbus, but for me it's perfect.*
Boofsquad mate, it seems like you are reading into a guys preferences about his production pipeline more than you should. Different people like different foods, different art, hell, art made with varying materials and methods, different music.... let this guys enjoy what he enjoys, it doesn’t effect your life. Hell, he even acknowledged strengths and weaknesses to hardware. Are you gonna tell a sculptor that they are ego driven and limiting their art by not painting? A person that works in moulding wet clay that they should carve instead? No, you watch them grow, develop and specialise their skills and accept them for the style of artist that they are. Some prefer a DAW, some prefer hardware, because of workflow differences and how their brain understands it, and some like both. Some don’t have time to learn new methods when they just want to be making music, especially with sadly limited time for learning existing in many busy (work enslaved) adult lives.
It sounds like you’ve got some ego issues of your own that you’re projecting onto others there buddy.
As someone who works on a computer for my professional career I try to avoid it if possible. I love being hands on and taking a creative break from the computer.
Eric Liss What do you use to create?
Loved the video it makes so much sense to me. Sometimes I feel stuck when making a song on where to start my automation. I feel I complicate it to much cause there is so many things to do in a daw.
I still want to use a daw like you said I would be more 60 40 get the meat of my track done then add some sprinkles and mix.
But something about tweaking knobs and not having to set up a full template for each vst for your midi controller.
I see why a lot of the pros use their daws like a tape machine everything is mixed and EQ before going in.
This is very much in line where i landed. Working with hardware was liberating and much more creative. What helps me bridge between the hardware and the DAW is my Presonus StudioLive 32.4.2 mixer/interface. I can record all the instruments to their own tracks and then mix and master in the DAW, the last mile. It was a significant investment but it has provided a ton of value. Great video, thanks as always.
I wish programs like Reason, Logic, Pro Tools and ESPECIALLY Ableton would come out with a computer that ONLY runs that DAW. Like a Chromebook for producers.
@Bob Familiar That's pretty awesome. I'm curious, about how much did that set you back?
@@adampate3893 i picked it up new 3 years ago for $1800 US. That's a lot but it is both my dawless mixer AND my audio interface. Presonus have since stopped making that model. worth checking out to see what they have today. There must be other options as well. I have not researched lately.
@@Jagilsdorf ipad can be pretty close to this vision.
That's a niiiice mixer!
Do you know any similar ones with maybe less tracks? Would love to get one to have separate recording channels!!!
Thats the beauty of Ableton. It took me from the linear programming to using clip based recording. I dig the ability to add and subtract instruments and to alter arrangements with midi controllers. It lead me to the same path. I don’t use software as much. I primarily prefer hardware but I do incorporate the iPad in my setup for ease of use and it’s compact size.
Totally agree with you homie - I use my DAW to track-out, mix, and master but everything is made upon my SP & MPCs 🙌
Great articulation Ricky, gives me insight into my own dawless journey and first track see unityloopmaschine circuit breaker
Man I really like your videos. Found your channel about a year ago and watched almost every episode. A chill vibe, cool ideas and a great personality to tie it all togethet. Keep doing what you're doing :)
For me when playing and recording music I prefer DAWless. I lean towards performance playing over looping in a DAW. Once I have recorded my performance now I prefer to mix in the DAW. I have outboard effects and yes I do use them sometimes but most of the time I prefer to use plugins for mixing as I don't have the outboard gear for mixing that I would want for the tasks.
A balance of the two is great if you can afford it. Even better if you can go all the way DAWless. If not then as long as your computer CPU can handle the workload then the main thing is recording the sounds and patterns that you have in your head or experimenting with ideas and record them. Software or hardware or both. Nike!! Just Do It!!
My first love was rock, metal, alternative music, the visceral thrill of attacking a guitar, I then got into pedals, looping, using a 4-track, drum machine & synths, and enjoyed the on the fly tweaking. Yes I can make music on an iPad now, but I really enjoy messing about with tweaking, playing live in the moment, feeling an instrument in my hands. I have a Circuit, which is awesome for quickly getting a groove going, and I’m looking to get some decent fx boxes, maybe a boss looper to mess with sounds on the fly, It’s all for fun, maybe the odd session at a party.
But, yeah, the most fun I ever had, was with the limitations of a 4-track, now I can use NanoStudio on my iPad, but I just enjoy being in the moment, tweaking the circuit, coaxing something new out of it’s limitations
I'm doing something similar. I miss my old Tascam cassette 4 track, even though tape hiss is a thing. It ran at double speed, which helped quite a bit and I love the old tape saturation. And it was easy to capture an idea quickly on the fly with my old setup. Instead of dicking around with software for an hour before getting anything done, all I had to do was start the drum machine, hit record, and start jamming.
Thank you for this video. I saw a video of someone making a song with only an OP-1 and Ive been researching grooveboxes and DAWs. But man I have been getting so frustrated because nobody has talked about what the actual process of CREATING the song is. You're the first person ive seen that makes the point that resonates with me, I dont know what song I want to write until my fingers touch the keys/pads.
Thanks you, very inspirational videos for workflow and what Gears to look for ! 🙏✨
Well said! I understand completely. This week I had a glitch in my daw which caused me to not see the wave form when recording. And I wondered why that was a problem for me? I noticed that I was looking to time keep instead of tapping myself or use a metronome. And obviously you always are a bit before or after the beat. And I started to quantize it, too look nice. And it killed the natural swing and falling and landing within the beat.
You tend to over use your eyes in a daw. When it should be your ears.
Raymond Doetjes have definitely experienced this
When I studied with Tom Erbe in the 90s he talked me into selling my hardware off but now he makes eurorack modules lol
I only use an iPad daw these days with Cubasis I use all hardware and the android app I wrote
Never take musical productivity advice from someone who has little to no musical productivity. Of course, his contributions to the science are immense and respected. But that's totally different from finishing and releasing a song.
@@coyote-wang use beatmaker 2 or 3
I have 2 on my ipad 1
Still using it
Its crazy goood
And i sample other apps synth (or use loops i create on electribe)
I love samplimg
@@meinemudda3095 yeah beatmaker3 works well on the new iPad mini for me
@@coyote-wang oh little stupid question
Is the ielectribe wavetable a good app or only presets overpriced stupid app
I cant install any apps
I am glad i had jailbroken mt ipad and install all good apps i can find on the ipad
I’m loving your approach on this. Went full software for a while and still loving some of the simplicity it brings with it but I’m moving towards getting more hardware for the reasons you mentioned. Nice video!
I'm a computer guy by trade and by hobby and have been for 20+ years. I find myself steeped into the bits and bytes of software constantly. It is something foreign and mysterious when I pickup a piece of hardware kit and try and get it to sing ... or at least make a pleasing noise. It gives me a chance to break-away from my 'day-job' and walk a path less traveled, sail a different ocean, etc. metaphor, etc.
Really enjoy your content Ricky. You have a gift in the way you communicate and portray your thoughts on video and in the music you produce.
Work with the tools that get the job done.
I’d never recommend a orchestral composer who regularly uses hundreds of gigs of samples and was bumping up against the old 256 track limit in Logic to try going DAWless.
Much like you’d never tell a stage keyboardist to tour the country with just a laptop.
I've been moving more into hardware for the simple reason that it feels like I'm using my computer or my synths as one big instrument. I get to interact with it instead of staring at a screen. The hybrid set up is definitely my preference, I can set up all the mixing and channels in Ableton and all the creative stuff is done on hardware. It's also very cost effective to do most of the effects using a DAW.
But you need a powerful cpu to use fx in real time is the only barrier.
@@lardosian not really. I've been using an ancient i5 machine that's running ddr3 RAM and a SATA SSD and I've had no problems at all running quite a few instances of effects at once. If you want to run stuff like kontakt then yeah, you need a powerful processor
@@squoblat I defo need a better machine thats for sure.
I just ordered a MPC One for myself to start a DAWless setup and I am really excited to start that journey.
I agree- use the best tools for each task. The DAW does tend to limit live performance and tactile interaction yet you need it for editing, mixing and polish.
I see your point, but going dawless is not my way. I use Ableton with my hardware synths. Nothing can beat DAWs sequencing capability and I don't want to restrict myself.
Ye its so nice to have a lot of options but sometimes the minimalism brings ideas i wouldnt have otherwise. But ye im also using both :) just expirienced it a lot on my own stuff
Do whatever works for you, but in a weird way having some limitations can be a good thing
@@markz9739 that's because limitation breeds creativity!
Hey how do you overdub record a monosynth in live?
I see both sides but whats best is what is best for you. There is no best. People can create great music on any DAW, Tape machine, Cheap s¥nths, expensive ones, soft synths hardware, its about the end result. People have written amazing songs on cheap guitars, expensive guitars, its not relevant
Love the video as always... I'm about 50/50, I love using both hardware and software synths then do all my arranging and editing in my DAW. I tried going DAW-less but just found myself making music that sounded more like rough demo drafts of a song.
Same here. it sounds cool, but when I compare it to some other released stuff I realise how badly it needs proper mixing and mastering.
@@hubadj exactly, I use alot of hardware but it always goes into my DAW.
Same journey here: from tape deck to hardware samplers to Reason to hardware synths to hybrid DAW/hardware.
Computer being more destination oriented and pre-meditated is totally acurate! Thanks for putting words on the topic, that’s helpful.
great honest insights, big up for that! i feel yours, especially with the splitter situations... still gasping for a more professionel equip for on the go recording professionally! peace
I'm going back to hardware. I spent too much time in the Ableton Live with sound design and other DAW rabbit holes. I'm putting together a very basic setup. I want to spend my time making music and not creating drum sounds or putting together effects chain.
lol same can be said about hardware synths... some really capture you for hours on end fiddling with the sounds and the sequencer.. non of that shit is the fault of the daw.. just your own..
start the daw with a song in mind. make a basic drum loop that fits your song... put in the song layer by layer... put in the vocals... then start tweaking everything.. and when it is done you still have time to fiddle around in the rabbit hole to maybe find the icing on the cake..
I'm mainly just mixing in the daw as a tape deck + effects processor...everything else pc free
Really great Ricky as usual. For me going hardware more importantly modular opened my mind to crafting new unique sounds and imorov experimentations and "playing / programming" an instrument. Now it's all about recording all the gear seamlessly. Keep up the good work!
Thanks for opening this conversation. I love the tactile feel of affecting the sound directly with hardware. I’ve tried with software (mainly Logic and Mainstage) using knobs to control those same functions but it’s just not the same as having dedicated control on an actual instrument. I use various synths with a hardware sequencer (Squarp Pyramid) because I prefer the hands-on approach of making that music happen live, as in affecting the sound of each instrument while it is playing, as opposed to prerecorded tracks. Plus I don’t need more screen time added to my life. I prefer looking at keys and turning knobs than clicking a mousepad.
I wish programs like Reason, Logic, Pro Tools and ESPECIALLY Ableton would come out with a computer that ONLY runs that DAW. Like a Chromebook for producers.
Seriously, Sometimes I don't want to turn my computer on, I just want to power on my DAW. It will be so NEXT LEVEL when I can buy an Ableton-Book for a grand.
It'd be simple and only what I need.
An 11" computer. No speakers. No Wifi. No HDMI either.
Just a trackpad, Keyboard, an SD card Reader, a 3.5mm Headphone jack and a SEPERATE 3.5mm Mic jack.
Then just give me like 4 USB 3.0 ports. If you want to get really fancy, add a BUILT IN 4x4 drum pad midi. Or take it even further and make a 15" laptop version with a Launchpad built in around the keyboard somehow. Idk. get creative
Strip down the laptop and reverse engineer that jazz with 1 goal in mind: a DAW. it would be the first DAW that is NOT a computer. Would it be considered analogue at that point? Who knows? All I know is I want one.
So I have a fun story for you.
The PC I make all my music on just...doesn't have internet access. I got it for less than the equivalent of 30 USD, (the school was upgrading the computer lab and I saved it from the garbage) The hunk of junk (who I've nicknamed William) does not have speakers. It has 2 gigs of RAM and basically only 2 programmes - Microsoft Word, and FL Studio.
My audio set-up is just....an aux chord into a Bluetooth speaker, or aux chord into headphones.
That's it.
And I would not trade it for the world.
Every time I sit down here I have 2 options - Open a word document (to plan D&D or write an assignment) or make music; and this set up is such a creativity factory for me. There isn't much else I can do except make music here. 10/10 recommend for music making
Granted I'm a dead broke final year high-schooler, so this set up is mostly out of necessity, but I really cannot recommend this type of set-up enough. It's entirely possible to build a DAW workhorse if you have the time and inclination (there's probably more than a few people looking to get rid of an old desktop PC)
Ever thought of LattePanda or similar x86 / x64 singleboard computer ? I'm sure there is a way to clean up desktop and run ableton as soon as OS starts. You could commission some computer tech to do it for you, or you could DIY it. It seems very lego like
@@bxktty okay, first of all, respect. The fact that you're main setup is so bare bones is awesome. so many gearheads out here get waaay to focused on high quality gear. But my major point is that your computer CAN do more. The fact of the matter is, Windows still runs processes in the background. You still have to boot up the computer which can take too long. Even 30 seconds is too long. I know that sounds picky, but i want something that is fast and designed to be a DAW from the start. I don't want an Operating System at all. No windows or max or chrome or linux. Nothing. Just Ableton. or Just Logic. or Just Reaper. You know?
Still, your setup is great and I respect the hustle. Also, since you're using FL, you should look into Ableton. It's always fun to try and make a simple beat in an Unfamiliar territory.
@@micindir4213 Thank you for the LattePanda. I didn't know that existed until now. I was considering using a raspberry pi or something similar, but yea I'm looking into making my own. If i can build one, I'd sell millions. I'm telling you. This is the future. even @b0xk1tty kind of proved my point. I just want a machine that does the work i need. nothing more and nothing less.
You could probably get close to this dream by using a very minimalistic linux setup with Bitwig studio. However, I don't recommend it because its quite a hazzle figuring out how to setup audio for music production in linux :(..... But if someone with the knowledge and time made a linux distro optimized for mainly running Bitwig studio, then I would no doubt pay money to get it..
I have my daw (ableton) template with a number of soft synths and effects . I know it and my displays usually turns off because of power save because I know where everything is and don't need it.. Almost everything I use is mapped to my midi controllers.
It's a bit like going DAWless with a DAW somewhere in the background that I don't see unless I want to go deep into some plugin preset or want to rearrange large parts of a track or something because that's just painful to do otherwise.
I tried to set Studio One up once with Axiom M32 controller, never managed and just gave up hahha.
That does sound like the dream for sure. I'll try again when I have another MIDI controller :)
How many controllers do you use? I find a single Novation Launch Control XL a bit lacking for that. Well, if you have the whole track set up it is mostly ok but when building the set up I can't get really efficient in using the controllers and found DAWs really frustrating because of that.
@@TimurBatyrshin I used to have an AXIOM 32, which has a LOOOOOOT of buttons and knobs for all your needs. Check it out, quite affordable as well.
It's what Marc Rebillet uses , check him out
Very thoughtful reflection and lots of great points. Back in the day early 1990s I was full on midi because hardware was too expensive. Fast forward I am at the 90/10 ratio with using Reason Daw as a mix mastering for all my tacking that is done via DP32 . Four Moog synths and Blofeld, Boss DR-880 and Squarp Pyramid for sequencing. a computer is needed to get out tracks out into the world... having a DAW around for tweaking etc is very helpful.
Great vid man, thank you!
Right on ! Don’t forget to leave some mistakes in there . Over-mixing is like flipping a burger too many times .
well i as much as i love your content, and your workflow, can not afford to buy as many fancy toys, given not all are expensive but still it adds up specially space wise as my studio is still in my room. . . :(. i do despise having no way to rid my eyes off the screen so i use push and a full 88 key midi controller. if i manage to not polishing stuff to oblivion i think i can come up with descent stuff.
yes !!! push 2 and ableton has come a long way to change my workflow from using the screen less and less, just dont use the akai mpc live,the last version, its like using a pad most of the time and a really old version of ableton and bad one at that...
1:34
“Reason”
Flipping the rack around hitting tab. Never dumb. Some real world and life lessons from connecting jacks, CV in that virtual set up. Educational, never dumb. I would never be embarrassed in those feature provided by Reason.
Propellerhead (now Reason studios) we’re the original “Roland fan boys”
Their first Product , Rebirth, which emulates an 909 Drum
Machine and an 808 drum machine with two 303 Bass synths, took me down the software/hardware rabbit hole of music synthesis.
I run both Daw (Ableton) and have an MPC one setting up with synths.
Best of both worlds.
Great video.
Really enjoyed the insights discussed.
🪄⭐️
For me there are 2 reasons why i recently went into dawless world:
1) "paralysis" of too much possibilities - often i was finding myself looking for that special bassline sound for hours, and then i've lost my inspiration and forgot what i was about to make, in Digitakt i can fidle with the sound while pattern is playing, kinda "on the fly", so composition and sound design go hand in hand, not one after the other
2) watching Your studio, Compact Creations series and explaining the Digitakt was that deciding factor for buying DT and going dawless
I had an idea to have fully complete setups in DAW and map everything you have to HW controller. And don't fiddle with selecting-connecting-disconnecting stuff when really playing. That way you would just plug in the DAW and start playing.
Unfortunately I still was not diligent enough to make that happen and just play with my HW synths.
I agree. I've been producing my own beats in Reason since I was 18. Last year I started playing the guitar again and using it more in my productions. I was just plugging it straight into the DAW or running it through Guitar Rig and thought it sounded fine, but then one day I decided to mic up and record straight from my shitty $80 amp and it sounded SO MUCH better to me!! Had much more character and it's fun to physically twist nobs and get new sounds rather than just use a mouse. I feel as though it's helped me a ton creatively! I started buying more pedals and ordered a new guitar amp a few weeks ago. I'm hoping to get a Moog Grandmother and drum machine when I get some more money. But yeah, it was quite the revelation.
A producer who is more tech and project minded will be more DAW centered. A musician who is more creative and artistic will gravitate to more of a DAWLESS setup. Both types can produce great music.
Totally disagree
Great analogy. I agree. I think using a DAW has so many advantages, but all of the automation is completely uninspiring to me. I I find the ideal setup for me is to take a song as far as I can go on my own using hardware, my hands, eyes and ears then when I’m done, finding someone who loves sitting in front of a screen and letting them do what they do best. I think both have advantages. It definitely is dependent on the type of artist you are.
Perhaps your comment is assumptive and a sweeping generalization?
I know deadmau5 pretty much goes all out on hardware. And he uses some software, but most of his sounds are from modular synths and keyboards. Same with nine inch nails.
Thanks for the video Ricky, it was actually enlightening!
Loved the video, I have been a Reason user since version 1 and have spent almost my whole music career writing music in a DAW. I am on vacation now and picked up a Circuit Tracks and have been absolutely loving the workflow. Now I am considering other gear and videos like this are a huge help in sorting out these thoughts. Thanks for sharing and you have gained a new follower!
I was in a DAW forever until last year when I got the model Cycles, then Digitone, and now a Digitakt and I’ve LOVED going dawless. You’re 100% right those limitations force you into all new places that you may not have ever discovered just in a DAW
No.1 reason for going DAWless is to prevent your DAW gaining consciousness and quantasizing all your hard work!
Quantization is good
I ran across this randomly researching ideas this morning...Quality vid and viewpoint..you just got a new subscriber🤟
Thanks for your thoughts on this Ricky! I really love utilizing the best of both worlds when I'm making music. Right now I'm using Push 2 a lot, but often I'll spend a week just jamming on Volcas. Thanks for spreading the love.
The limitations on my Electribe 2 and 2s makes me work harder.. Oldskool rulez.. Knobs and sliders..
I find that with a DAW I have kind of a blank slate feeling sometimes that makes it hard to know where to begin. With hardware I feel like I know better how to begin.
I make templates in Ableton Live so I never need to work with a blank slate. Works wonders. :)
@@Claidheambmor Sounds like a good idea. I haven't tried Ableton Live yet, but I am a little curious about it.
@@adampate3893 Pretty much all the major DAWs allow you to create templates, not just Live. Many use those also for having mixing specific templates or recording/hardware specific ones and so on. Also you could try to create workspace in your chosen DAW which would eliminate also a bit of that blank slate syndrome. Also: choose some restricted set of plugins, learn to utilise them and create that way some restrictions for yourself. That also eliminates a lot of the feeling of "where should I start?", when you know your instruments. It creates a feeling where you eventually "just know" what is the right choice for specific scenarios and you don't spend too much time on wondering "which plugin to use?" Hope this gave you some ideas. :)
@@jarkokoo It does give me some ideas for sure, for when I go into a DAW. Recently though, I've been recording off of a Groovebox into Audacity, and that has been working. I've never really found a daw that felt right like this does. There's something wonderful about using a machine that is designed from the ground up to make music, with no capability of checking email. I've used quite a few DAWs over the years, but never really had one that speaks to me the way that hardware does. Acid was probably the one that was closest, but sadly, since Magix took over development of it, its now a DAW I not only don't use, but wouldn't recommend either.
@@ftj4441 "You will always have more fun to play soccer than play soccer in a video game." You summed it up perfectly.
I agree completely, Ricky, the limiting factors for me are space, and money. I love my little analog synth, but if I opted for hardware-only, that one synth is all I'd have. Optimally I'd be hardware-based, for now I'm super-glad to have the software option so I can still create.
Great video. Dawless feels so souless. I love working outside the box so much more. The sounds you make feel more produced than anything made inside of a computer. Keep up the great videos Ricky.
A big contribution to the special feel of an entire song done without a DAW is that the song had to be INTERESTING to you the entire time you were playing it live while recording it...you HAD to push it along, you HAD to make the changes in texture, patterns, mutes at the time that you felt it was right. That energy you feel while the song is playing, that energy while tells you where the song needs to go and when, is very hard to tune into and lock on to if you are constantly stopping and starting and editing, and then rendering at the end.
This is why, although I use the daw a lot, I usually record my tweaks on the fly until they sound right. Never used midi automation (CC's) much as I prefer the connection I get when feeling the music and turning the knobs in real time.
There are definite advantages to both hardware and DAW, I'm kinda 50 / 50.
Thanks man. I’ve been trying to do both simultaneously and felt like it was cutting my brain in half. All I need is me and my analogue gear.
Hey Ricky. Loved this post. I agree it's great to have a dawless setup along with Abelton. I try and stay away from a sequencer and use the on board sequencers. Such as Microbrute and Bass station 2. Also using arps on Mini nova etc. If you use a Drumbrute impact or TR8 or Uno drum as clock and use a midi thru box it works really well and can go in a large bag so portable for live. I am really into the Novation Launchkey mini mk 3 as the Mutate function on the Arp is amazing. Must use a TRS A adaptor but found the Electron Model Samples has one. Thanks again for all your comments and suggestions. They are fantastic.
'Sound like a boomer saying that' what does that mean?
Yea, the Reason cable swing animation is legendary.
@Mot Yrrah Hmm I'm Not Sure😎
But with the ecomony the way it is, you could be right (brought to you by Brawndo©®™)
I can honestly say, that with software there is problem / advantage of total recall. Total recall means never finished, and if your computer allows, you can always go back to the source and edit it - even if you have your mastering chain ready. That kind of non-linearity of the process is what's difficult to understand to average person. You need routines and processes in place to tackle a piece of music to a finished state. Remember, that this business was very divided and mix engineer wasn't a producer, and producer didn't play drums (very, very rare). Now when we are in DIY age you've got to do all by yourself, and honestly its more than one undisciplined person can handle.
I personally find hardware fits three categories. Its either
spicy sampler material, that is unique and generic enough to fit the music
(modular, individual drum module etc. , cheap stompbox )
or some sort of a small sketchpad, a toy meant to spark ideas.
(yamaha QY, volca sample, almost anything with sequencer/sampler inside)
some specific gear, a template sound if you will,
that can be grabbed fast
(303 clone, DX , 1080, moog funk lead, stringmachine)
With hardware there is this feeling that you get when you perform a track into tape machine. A very special kind of feeling. There is magic happening if you lay a track with small changes to a sound at right places, and then do same for number of tracks. Not to overcook is another skill that is acquired later, knowing how much of a changes in this specific layer you need even before everything else is layed.
Software is conquered by applying your specific routines to it. In case of ableton live, making your / buying packed effects or instrument racks is one part of it, another is a way to differentiate writing process from arranging and mixing. For example one strategy might be to limit a track to a number of mix buses
@@philxdev I can say for myself that I struggle to churn definitive studio versions of the track. In analog recording you are really limited by track number. 8 tracks were a luxury for DIY and most of the time it was 12 channel mixer into 1/4in 2 track. So you had to be 100% sure of your arrangement before committing to tape. Midi sequencing was separate matter, you had all the time in the world to perfect your mmt 8 pattern, but mixer limitation still applied.
Knowing all that I still cannot commit to final versions with ableton without definitive deadline. There's definitely a limbo of some sort inside daw
Really cool video explaining everything!
the using your ears more point, and also embracing imperfections and working faster/more intuitively are my fav things about hardware
I went dawless after 20 yrs of daw use. I still have to get used to recording, it's way different without a daw / software aranger. But dawless made me accept the things I cannot change. :)
I just don't get why Goku would abandon his son to go train in the forbidden zone........
I'm coming up on two years since I started my journey into eurorack. Before that I had absolutely no experience in anything musical, save for a few years as a kid playing saxaphone. I've learned a lot from your channel (thanks for being a good reason I bought a BIA and a Mimetic) and I resonated a lot with what you said in this video. I work primarily with video editing, and I always assumed using a DAW would come naturally to me given how comfortable I am in video editing apps but I found out rather quickly that that wasn't the case. I've learned a lot in the last two years and I'm currently struggling with how to record/mix/master my synth both technically and philosophically, but I guess that's just part of the struggle. You're an awesome inspiration and I'm a big fan of your work, thanks for putting out this great content, I've learned a lot from you and hope to keep doing so in the future!
Your best video for me. U really got the point in jaming with hardware, much more creative way for shure.
2020 is the best time for music makers to try to go Dawless. The genius is in the creative mind not the machine.
Exactly.Go wild on hardware.Once u get the aha moment. Finish in the daw
why go Dollars
Haha that’s good
Great video thanks, I heard the sound quality from hardware is better as more voltage and bigger components inside the synth really pushes the crispness.
Me personally I’m a hardware type of guy. I go to Guitar Center and spent hours using their hardware but when I go home and use the computer and a midi, I get bored so easily I can’t come up with any ideas at all. That being said I’ve decided to go hardware but record all those instruments and arrange/mix/master on Ableton to finish the final product.
The important question. WHY THE HELL IS YOUR FRIDGE DOOR EMPTY?
i eat too much :/
No hot sauce!!! 🤯🤯🤯
depends what kind of music you are making. good luck with making drum and bass strictly on hardware
Lol no way dude, lots of classic DNB came out of stuff so primitive you wouldn't believe it. Like the MMT-8, SP-303, etc
@@TheCALMInstitute fair enough, but I don't know of any current dnb artists using strictly hardware
Dude, almost all dnd classics are made on a hardware sampler with hardware fx and a computer (but only for the sequencing)
@@scality4309 true, up until 21 years ago
@@terrorbirbfpv4732 Pete cannon did a video earlier this year. Even pressed vinyl directly from 8bit amiga octamed. Super video. Was for Sound on Sound.
i feel exactly like you feel - hardware gets me to go by ear and i feel more like i'm making music instead of "constructing" music. the DAW on the other hand gives me the opportunity to analyze what i just did and improve it in many cases or just finalize it!
This reminds me so much of my other life designing interfaces for medical devices. The example of “listening with your eyes” (my words) rather than with your ears when using a DAW is beautiful. I’m adding it to my bestiary of User eXperience examples.
Always felt that music doesn't have to be super polished anyways
I rarely agree with anyone 100% but I’m with you on this one.
I just figured out the same thing for myself... Using my gear is soo much fun BUT finishing the tracks is sometimes very difficult. I produce with gear and record and finish everything in DAW.
I found a love for hardware through Reason (and still use it! It's even better now, and the cables in the back are still amazing - and useful!!). Now that I have some hardware synths and samplers, I run it all into a Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 with an adat expander, so 16 channels, and mix in Reason after recording. Sometimes I use it to arrange as well, or sometimes use it as a sampler to drop in drums or whatever and then play the Digitakt or Circuit or DeepMind or whatever on top of it. Just like I would with a guitar or bass or cello. So I see them as instruments more than an *alternative* to a computer. That said, if I had an Octa or ARmkII or convenient mixer (and space to set up hardware away from my studio computer) then I would probably love working that way too.
Look at it this way - if you're gonna put your music out on Spotify or iTunes or whatever, you need to use a computer in the end anyway. Maybe for people who are anti-daw it would be better to use something like ProTools, Logic, Harrison MixBuss, MOTU Digital Performer, or even Adobe Audition, because those all function much more like multi-track tape recorders, and you'd be less tempted to line everything to the grid and mess with the mouse all that much, more for setting levels, doing some software EQ and maybe some send FX like basic delay and reverb, etc.
Dawless is good for live performance but for recording you can't beat a Daw. There is a reason Professional recording studios around the world use them.
That's why I utilise both in unison
I write with hardware.
I record with a DAW.
It’s the only way.
Another reason is that in software there's always something preventing fun, like: Oh, wanna use that plugin? Sorry, it crashed / your daw crashed / you're out of memory and CPU because there are already a ton of other plugins and stuff opened and you need to close it all / your system will now update, so fuck you and your music / your cheapo midi interface is not responding for some reason, please throw it out the window and proceed to the "fuck you" stage / ...
It's not good nor it is bad, it's inevitable, because software products are one of the most complex systems made by humanity. Hardware is much more simple, foolproof and responsive. But of course there's much plugins I would miss like graphic EQs and compressors, great reverbs and delays.
P.s. Right now I am writing it and at the same time avid update agent can't exit because it freezed :-D
Like with anything that runs hard on the computer; SAVE OFTEN... I was thinking about how i would love to have an effect rack recently - and then i remembered that i have Komplete 11 Ultimate on my computer, so i can use that as my effect rack. If i bought hardware versions of everything on my computer, it would cost a fortune, and i could still only use 1 instance of it - so if i want different parameters for the effects i want to put on different instruments, i would have to get several of the effect modules. On my computer, i can just load up another instance of the plugin... And software is usually DIRT CHEAP and full of features i often dont find on hardware versions. So for most people, where money is an issue, id say that software is "where its at"... Thats just me though... I love hardware, but it just doesnt provide all the features im used to with my plugins... And in my world; "less features" means "NOT AS GOOD"... Of course the "hands on" experience of hardware is awesome, but... I think the Maschine MK3 is gonna solve at least most my issues with using software :P
I believe you're having those issues, but I'm not. My daw doesn't crash, I've got enough RAM and a decent processor (have to bounce midi to audio only after 100 tracks) and I schedule my updates. And it's not as if hardware units never break down, or need a restart either.
Well, they break of course, but I've never encountered this. And usually producers don't ship broken hardware anyway because it would cost them alot in the future. With software... em, not so much.
The latest example: I've bought a Largo VST. It's a great software copy of Blofeld with extended possibilities. I love it, but... every time I click on precise edit a control and then anywhere else on the screen, it crashes. I can't even imagine this kind of problem happening on a hardware synth. And these guys sell it for a couple of years now.
P.S. Let me be clear. It's not because they are bad or stupid, or that everyone always have software problems. There are thousands of possible OS/DAW/drivers/computer hardware combinations and it's impossible to check them all. This is usually not the case when developing a hardware synth, because it has a static configuration, and all encountered bugs are easy to reproduce on a dev stand.
That would only usually happen if you don't know what you're doing and are using an ill-equipped setup. But I get your point, hardware stuff is the same every time and you can really get good at using it.
>Avid update agent
Well there's your problem right there.
No seriously, Avid software sucks the fun out of everything.
I loved your explanation about why you liked the hardware and the ability to use your hands. I’m sold!
I actually think you’ve hit on something really important when you talk about the computer being destination-based, and needing to know what parameter you’re going to manipulate before you do it. I absolutely agree, and love the ability of hardware to show you all possibilities for manipulation that currently exist all at one glance. I think it’s the same reason boxes or modules that rely on a lot of menu diving often aren’t as much fun.
Yeah, this is much more an attribute of the analog revolution of the past decade and the knob-per-function ideal. But go back to the 90s and 00s to the digital synth boxes that were the only option in hardware, and the picture was much less pleasant. DAWs weren't really an option, and hardware was mostly huge plastic boxes with tiny 2 row monochrome screens and poorly translated user manuals. Makes me really appreciate the state of music technology nowadays.
I totally agree. The fusion and integration between the DAW and hardware is awesome. The hardware drives the DAW. Awesome video thank you.
Your comment about getting your gear to agree with your weird ideas is spot on!
Great video, been through a similar journey and I couldn’t have put it better myself 🙌
Appreciate your introspection