I’m suing Marvel as well. I was once bitten by a spider and shortly after my uncle died. He wasn’t murdered or anything but he did tell me to be more responsible once. I’m thinking 400 million should cover it.
I too was bitten by a spider once. I work in a prison, I know 1,500 guys who claim to be bitten by spiders, and almost 1,000 who claim to be feminists, at least three who look like Lady Dead Pool, and one who think's he's a dog.. we have a class action lawsuit on our hands!
@@TheKevinRH Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB? Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video? I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife. It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person. People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author? Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)? And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
@@loistreasures4094 that in itself is not. But Blake lively accused him of sexual harassment, but in Justin's lawsuit he has text messages of Blake's PR stating that it doesn't matter if it's true or not, people don't care about the truth
Everyone in the comment section is so one minded, obviously the joke wouldn’t mention Justin baldonis specific name or it would be too obvious , it was a dig at Justin just like the where is the intimacy coordinator line
I'm sure only 5-10% of people would have seen this as a character based on him! I'm part of that 90% that didn't know anything about this but now I do and..... I'm with Ryan on this one
Even less than that, I would guess. At least nobody I know had any clue. But yeah, 100% behind Ryan and Blake on this, that douche is just being a douche because he was called out on being a douche.
This is getting out of hand. My wife has been following this for weeks now. Already had Kang ruined by some accusations, if Deadpool gets ruined before Secret Wars.. don’t even want to think about it.
Don’t worry Disney has the best lawyers for better or for worse TheActor who played Kang was a liability Ryan Reynolds is one of the biggest assets they have and he is much beloved Unless you did something truly truly heinous, they aren’t dropping him
What a fricking reach. Ryan has been mocking his Canadian heritage in media for years. The character is the equal opposite of Deadpool and caricature of Canadians often done in media. Leave my MCU out of this.
Such a reach and honestly who cares? Too much needless legal action that totally nullifies real and respectable suits. Frick I wish I had nothing better to do. Love all people and hey we should just find a way to get back to laughing shiz off and love each other and work things out.
I'd never even heard of Justin Baldoni before hearing something about him and Blake Lively. Have I just been living under a rock or is he not a known name?
@@sonny-k8hahhh so you know him? People get a perception of people thinking they know them just from BS online the fact is you don't have a clue what kind of person he is, just like Reynolds no one but friends and family truly know them.
The Streisand effect could probably be said more about Blake's actions than Justin's. She initiated the whole conflict by suing him for SH, he's just responding in an act to defend himself from her attempt to defame him and steal his credits. Most people probably didn't even know who Justin was or the other things Blake and Ryan has been accused of before she sued him, the Streisand effect.
So, ur saying a victim "initiates" the "conflict" by reporting the abuse? no. victims are not responsible for the bad behavior of others. and it wasnt just SH, he actively conspired with 2 publicists to defame her and ruin her career. the diff is, she has the evidence to prove her claim. hes just desperate and swinging at a giant steel pinata with a woofle bat. marvel is gonna make him wish HE never initiated this $hit.
The evidence does not support that and i suggest you read both lawsuits. Justin has receipts and Blake will lose in the court of public opinion. Nobody likes bullies and liars and she has been proven to be both.
@@elenaechevarria its funny how people equate their own opinion to "public opinion," and suggest anyone who thinks otherwise is ill-informed. literally nothing u said is true, and i did read both. his suit reeks of desperation, is entirely retaliatory, and he has zero evidence (which is why hes asking marvel for it), whereas her suit is already backed by co-workers and texts between the accused. as a woman, i just have to ask, why would u support this scumbag over a fellow woman speaking out about abuse? u clearly have ur opinion about blake, but since its not based on facts i can only surmise that you're jealous, and have zero predator spotting skills.
Nice report. It's easy to get defensive about a favorite character or movie, but you kept it unbiased and reminded your audience that this is only a small piece of the actual case.
Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB? By the way, this lawyer is one of the best lawyers in LA and if you look him up, you will see he is not a frivolous man who wastes his time on BS like “parody”, which is protected free speech. This lawyer had a reputation for being effective in representing individuals against major corporations, there’s a reason why he’s going so hard against BL and RR. Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video? I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife. It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person. People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author? Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)? And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
unfortunately Baldoni is just bringing negative attention to himself. no one would have connected him with Nicepool before he started talking about it.
Unfortunate, because there is a long history of Blake and Ryan being complete a-holes on many different sets. Actors, crew, and directors have acknowledged the issues of working with them. Blake has only gotten worse since Ryan's success as Deadpool. I know the fans don't want to hear it, but Ryan and Blake are not great people in real life. They are literally bullies. Ryan is better at hiding it
He’s not suing Marvel for money. And he’s not suing about the parody. Don’t worry, the real reason is so deep, you probably won’t have to worry about accidentally learning about it now
It's not even parody, it's Nicepool. Baldoni thinks he is more famous than he is; no one would make the connection. But now that Justin is suing EVERYONE WILL KNOW the connection. What a dumb move.
JB’s lawyer wants everyone to know, that’s one of the purposes of him telling everyone about it publicly in the news. You might be better off ignoring all this, it’s much deeper than you think it is
The allegations aren't purely for this though, it's that the guy had his movie hijacked by bullies. If this feeds into it then all the better for his case. I liked Ryan Reynolds but I also appreciate Hollywood is full of narcissists who don't appear to be who they seem.
Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB? By the way, this lawyer is one of the best lawyers in LA and if you look him up, you will see he is not a frivolous man who wastes his time on BS like “parody”, which is protected free speech. This lawyer had a reputation for being effective in representing individuals against major corporations, there’s a reason why he’s going so hard against BL and RR. Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video? I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife. It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person. People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author? Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)? And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
I don’t know or care what is or isn’t real here. But what’s funny is how nobody would have ever even thought Nicepool was a caricature of Baldoni until he made these claims. Baldoni: “THEY’RE MAKING FUN OF ME!!” Everyone: “Oh … huh, really?”
This guy is a literal walking contradiction, after he had his PR firm attack Blake now he thinks Ryan and the MCU actually gives a $hit about him, if he thinks he was “smeared” before, just wait for the fandom to get ahold of him! LFG❤️💛!!!
Short of a written document that says, “Let’s make a character to explicitly mock the guy who harassed/💩-talked my wife”, I doubt this lawsuit goes anywhere.
"harassed" Blake is pulling a Jada Smith move, exaggerating BS and taking offense where she need not. Ryan is playing the Will Smith move, and being a dickish bully in an attempt to "defend" his wife. Blake has a long history of being a bully and drama queen. Ryan has a history of using the Deadpool character and productions to bully specific people he doesn't like. This behavior has been acknowledged by actors, directors, and crew members. There is more going on here then the fans want to see. Ryan and Blake are actually the ones in the wrong, and are acting like victims while mocking the guy they have been bullying over stuff he didn't actually do. This is what happens when you piss off a dramatic hypocritical narcissist, and her husband thinks he needs to defend her.
Blake Lively accused the director of sexual harrassment and threw the kitche nsink at him. His talent agency dropped him on the basis of her allegations before anything had been judged. So he's coming back at her, but wants all the records preserved from Disney to show that she was making fun of the situation, and didn't feel powerless or victimized by her harrasser as she claimed. I think he's more interested in the documentation that the new york times and disney have for his lawsuit against blakely.
According to the legal filings, the people Baldoni was dealing with at the PR firm were actually trying to poach clients and wreck the rep of the PR firm so they could start their own firm. Text messages in those filings imply it was those women who set out to smear Lively in the press - both to save Baldoni should Lively go public, and to destroy the PR firm. The only way we will truly know what happened on set is from the rest of the crew. Baldoni says they were all intimidated by Lively (and Ryan, and Taylor apparently), Lively says they were all uncomfortable with Baldoni. Looking only at magazine articles is a really bad way to report legal news like this. Look at the legal filings and get the 'full' story
Of course, his talent agency dropped him because they also represent Lively and Reynolds. Hopefully, there's no truth to it, but if there is, Reynolds and Lively will be paying this guy a lot of money for defamation. This won't sit well with Disney at all!!!
She listed legitimate complaints and provided subpoenaed documents from Sony Pictures Baldoni’s regular PR firm and crisis PR firm, subpoenaed texts extracted by court forensics extraction program from Baldoni & his associates phones and subpoenaed emails from same supporting her cause of action. Sony Pictures has publicly stated they are willing to testify in court, cast & crew have made social media posts & public statements supporting her. The book author has made a public statement supporting her. But sure your misogynist account is probably what happened… Even with a mountain of evidence and witnesses you won’t believe women and will trash them to filth yet you’ll still claim in the same breath we make false accusations because we somehow benefit from it? Pick a lane! Because you don’t get to have it both ways!
Reading about this. The second i opened the artice and it started talking about one actor flaming another actress after a previous movies premiered i just got enraged. Imagine being that rich possibly millions of adoring fans and they still all act like children
What's Baldoni hoping to find in The Marvel documents? Something flat out saying "play the character like Baldoni in a deadpool suit"? And, even if it did, that's not illegal.
@@kks2360 Nope, just a little man and a big ego with more money than sense. Lawyers will indulge any client's frivolous lawsuit no matter how DOA so long as they can cut a fat check out their client.
@ Nothing I just have actually known lawyers/judges and listened to them talk shop & $h!t for a good chunk of my life. One of my parents worked in a county courthouse naturally I'm pretty jaded abut these sort of things. Oh BTW no matter how full BS they are never ever under any circumstance contradict a Judge in their court. I mean its a rather obvious conclusion but the number people Lawyers included that do so anyway is truly staggering.
@@Terminalsanity serious question: are you a true MCU fan that obsesses over the differences in details between the comic books and the movies and tries to find all the Marvel Easter eggs? Let’s assume for a second that I also know a bunch of lawyers and also that we all think it’s about the money for the lawyers because “it always is”. It’s a fact that this lawyer doesn’t care about the parody because he knows it’s protected speech. This particular lawyer also wouldn’t bother wasting his time with a parody. His office and his home burned down in that inferno in LA. This case was presented to the public in a way where it was written like a graphic novel, very easy to read, and everyone is reading it despite the thing being 179 pages long. But this lawyer also knows exactly which parts of this case are going to be taken seriously by the judge and which ones aren’t. He’s not trying to trick anyone, he’s told everyone exactly what he’s doing. So, Deadpool and Wolverine movie, Ryan Reynolds, Marvel Easter eggs, and a formal request to preserve documents that reference the character Nicepool sent to Marvel studios. These documents would potentially include any communications between people who worked in the production of D and W… I can understand why people keep trying to laugh this thing off, but I can promise that most people are, at a minimum, be annoyed when figure out how much time and money RR spent on vendetta. At most, they will realize what a vindictive, cruel person RR is, not to mention insecure, and they will not be able to watch him in anything ever again.
I guess Reynolds verbally insulting Justin Baldoni in a passive aggression way is much better than slipping Chris Rock, this was Reynolds defending his wife to sue him over that one bit, seems childish, but that's Hollyweird.
Blake and Ryan have a history of bullying people over very petty things. This guy doesn't deserve this crap, but somebody needs to start talking about this, if their bullying is EVER going to come to light. Whenever others have spoken about the way these two act, they have been immediately slandered and/or blacklisted. Ryan had a lot of power in Hollywood, and he uses it like a lovedrunk bullly. Blake is Jada and Ryan is Will, for sure. Very good comparison.
I had no idea of who NicePool was supposed to be before the suits surround “It Ends With Us” broke. @Emily D Baker is an attorney who’s doing breakdowns of the many, many suits surrounding this situation…I highly suggest her breakdowns. Thanks for covering this!
Zack Peter does a much better breakdown because he actually has connections in entertainment and he consults with legal experts to make sure he understands the legal aspects.
@Jhdxxbhgdscvf that is a valid stance to take as I would do the same. However, he's admitted to making comments to her. It's not as simple as defending himself for SH. He's upset about the defamation he's received through a parody character that he claims is about him regarding the SH comments he confirmed he made. I was just saying that it doesn't help his case.
I mean, I'm willing to bet that a lot of Nicepool was done off-the-cuff and didn't get fully written down. I think it's ok with SNL & Family Guy is because they're blatantly stating who they are impersonating. If he feels like Nicepool is mocking him, he could feel like it's a deformation of character, but even that's an extreme reach. People just want money, and will grasp at straws to get it.
@@bricio4688Wouldn’t it only be defamation if the plaintiff didn’t do the bad things being parodied? If such a case went to trial, what the person did or didn’t do would surely have to be investigated in detail.
@@reggiestone730 this isn't about a lawsuit. It's about reputation and court of public opinion. Imo they are just using the lawsuit to publish all of these texts for court of public opinion
Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB? It’s a ridiculously long period of time and almost none of the dialogue between Nicepool and Deadpool is related to the plot of the movie at all. You remember what happened to TJ Miller, right? By the way, this lawyer is one of the best lawyers in LA and if you look him up, you will see he is not a frivolous man who wastes his time on BS like “parody”, which is protected free speech. This lawyer had a reputation for being effective in representing individuals against major corporations, there’s a reason why he’s going so hard against BL and RR. Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video? I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife. It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person. People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author? Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)? And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
Astonishingly thrilled to see future Marvel content but agitated to have missed Xmen97 finale however excited to be able to catch Deadpool & Wolverine.
This dude needs to leave Deadpool alone! Idk if it's referring him. It's satire! Honestly I had no idea and would of probably never knew till this lawsuit!
@Arsus-gp6ih You must be a little slow! So I'll explain deeper if you can understand. Bringing the franchise into this could have repercussions in the future!
@@sinont7051 the man got accused of SH and SA, he’s fighting for his reputation and ability to continue his career. They are only going after him because he finally stood up to them and told them no.
By not saying Jason's name its still protected, legally he could be talking about anyone, doesn't matter how much it feels like Jason is being talked about he was not named
"Reynolds made fun of me in a movie" Called you out by name? "No" Did he portray you a certain negative way? "Yes! As someone nice!!! I am gonna sue his pants off!!"
@@GrizzlyX If the details have to be spelt out in that level of detail for the average viewer of the movie to catch, it is hard to claim it was any meaningful attack. Personally, I just thought it was a parody of a Nicolas Cage Deadpool.
Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB? By the way, this lawyer is one of the best lawyers in LA and if you look him up, you will see he is not a frivolous man who wastes his time on BS like “parody”, which is protected free speech. This lawyer had a reputation for being effective in representing individuals against major corporations, there’s a reason why he’s going so hard against BL and RR. Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video? I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife. It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person. People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author? Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)? And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
It's circumstantial evidence. The alleged "parody" of Baldoni, if that indeed is what it was, would only be relevant, and identified by those who were in the know. The average (billions of people) moviegoers, myself included, did not connect what Nicepool said to Baldoni. So (IMHO), if he's going for defamation of character, it's hardly damaging his public, image, if the alleged "joke" is found liable.
I don’t think it was intended for audiences to actually KNOW it’s based on Baldoni. It was more between Ryan and Blake to mock Justin like an inside joke so only they knew who Nicepool is based on. It’s pretty obvious it’s based on him. If it wasn’t for all the false accusations and defamation that would severely hurt Baldoni’s reputation he might’ve let it pass but it’s a connection to their unprofessional behavior that can be used against them.
Marvel audiences have been trained for years to detect Easter eggs, you will be disappointed in the fact that there are so many in this film that point to his exact identity. You think RR doesn’t want you to know how clever he is?
The legal framework i think they are going for would be one of slander/libel/harassment. Slander & libel require that something untrue was said that caused an injury. Since Baldoni is a public figure, the higher level requirement of actual malice also applies. However, I believe this will fail because nobody knew anything about Nice Pool being satire of Baldoni. Therefore, there was no injury until he outed himself. The harassment part is a little more nebulous, but I believe it will ultimately fail on actual injury and 1st amendment grounds. You are allowed to mock someone publicly as long as you do not slander, libel, or threaten them. Again, because Baldoni is a public individual, he will have to reach a higher bar to prove harassment. This is going nowhere, in my opinion. It smacks of desperation and legal intimidation. I suspect his main lawsuit is failing, and he is searching for something to prop it up. Or that Renyolds and Lively will just get fed up and settle. I doubt that. I don't know about Lively, but Renyolds appears to be a very determined and headstrong individual. I would not be surprised if he fights it all the way on principal alone.
Nope. Think deeper, specifically about which Marvel Easter eggs about the parody are present and where in the film they are. Then consider the movie making process and how much time is devoted to writing and development. Consider who would be discussing it. You might get to where I’m pointing if you start there
@kks2360 Dude, if you have to be this cryptic in your response to make it sound reasonable, a jury is never going to buy it. Either point something out specifically or go away. The law is about facts and actual injury. Not innuendo and speculation. I am not saying they didn't sneak in a few jabs. Just that they don't rise to the level of slander/libel/harassment because there is no injury from them, if present. On top of that, as a public figure, Baldoni is going to have to meet a much higher legal bar that makes it much harder to prove. If you have examples, you need to justify them in the legal framework of being 1) false, 2) provably malicious, and 3) causing actual injury through reputational damage.
@ I am talking about actual legal strategy. But I am curious to see who actual figures it out. One or two people have good theories about the reasoning. But the biggest clue is the lawyer. He is not a frivolous man, he represents some of the most influential people in the country and he does not strike me as a person who wastes his time. But if you think you’re better at this than he is, I’m fine with taking your word for it.
@kks2360 i am not better. I just require specifics for an argument. All you have given is vague hints and innuendo. Unfortunately for you, the legal system also requires evidence to make a case. So, if you are going to make the argument that this is not frivolous, you need to provide examples. As far as the reputation of the lawyer goes, that is far from definitive. A lawyer will represent their client even if they don't agree with them because they are an advocate, not the one on trial. Given enough money, any lawyer would take on a case they personally believe to be unwinnable and/or frivolous. To meet their ethical obligations, they will advise their client as such, but continue to represent the client if the client decides to proceed. At best, a lawyer's reputation is a vague indicator of a case's potential and not something I would hang my hat on. Good lawyers catch bad cases and lose all the time. It is part of the job. Once they accept the retainer and begin the case, they are ethically obligated to see the case to the end, in most situations. The exception is if the client terminates their representation. So, this could have been a case with initial an initial plausible base that fell apart, and the lawyer is now stuck with. Again, your argument fails because you didn't provide any actionable examples. Please provide them in your next reply. Or at least state an actual theory that can be debated. Anything less at this point just indicates equal measures of arrogance and ignorance.
@ 😆😆😆 I mean, I appreciate you educating me, but you do know I’m not the actual lawyer, right? You seem to be a pretty smart guy, I’m sure you’ll get there eventually
Ryan and Blake have a long history of bullying people and making exaggerated accusations. Whenever anyone talks about it, they usually get blacklisted, publicly slandered, or the entire thing just gets swept under the rug. Nothing with come of this, other than perhaps more of the public being aware that these two people are literally narcissistic bullies in real life. Never meet your heroes.
The context that was stripped was that any of those lines had anything to do with him... Good job letting us all know, Baldoni... The Streisand effect is real.
Its so.much more than the Deadpool joke. So much more. He and his wife has lied about another person, and tried to ruin him with those lies. Watch popcorned planets video about the lawsuit documents.
Wouldn’t have mattered what he said it was, the clues, as always, are in the Marvel Easter eggs. Can’t unsee it once you see it. None of this is about the parody, his lawyer doesn’t give a crap about that
Ryan and Blake are total bullies. Will never watch anything with Ryan and Blake again. They need to be sued into oblivion. She's literally Amber Heard 2.0 and Ryan is no better.
I know way too much about this. Let’s be real. Allegations aside, I wouldn’t put it past Reynolds. Everything good gets ruined by bonehead moves fueled by overblown egos.
Ryan AND Blake both have a history of bullying people on set and making exaggerated claims. Fame has gone to their heads like the Rock, and they have been total a-holes behind the scenes. This has been acknowledged by cast, crew, and directors. They bully people on set, knowing nothing will happen because they are the star, they try to steal control of movies from the hired directors, and they gaslight people by pretending that they never bullied or mocked anyone. They actually play the victim, which is so insane. The fans appear to be allergic to reality on this one. These two have been dicks for decades. This Baldoni guy didn't do anything to deserve this.
Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB? By the way, this lawyer is one of the best lawyers in LA and if you look him up, you will see he is not a frivolous man who wastes his time on BS like “parody”, which is protected free speech. This lawyer had a reputation for being effective in representing individuals against major corporations, there’s a reason why he’s going so hard against BL and RR. Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video? I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife. It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person. People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author? Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)? And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
That’s actually a crazy iykyk situation between Ryan Reynolds and Justin baldonies parties ..that would have never been picked up on if it weren’t for the law suit
I dont think Baldoni will sue Disney. It's about showing a pattern of bullying and threatening behavior by Ryan and Blake. Just think of Dogpool as a metaphor for the It End With Us movie, that Deadpool wants to take from Nicepool who ends up being killed by Ladypool.
@@mindhy3he’s not suing Disney, parody is not illegal or defamatory. He’s asking them to preserve their documents regarding the Deadpool and Wolverine movie.
Reynolds tried to buy the movie rights from Justin Baldoni. Justin declined. Then things went down hill from there. If there is a "morality clause" in the contract it means, if Justin has been convicted of improper/criminal behaviour, the book rights for the film automatically switch back to Colleen Hoover who begged Justin to cast Blake in the first place, then supported Blake with the fake sexual assault allegations. A film about Domestic Violence got undermined. Ryan changing the script, abusing the director, and getting him removed from his talent agency. Blake directing the director and demanding new wardrobe for her character of a book she did not read. What an insecure, unhinged psychopath Reynolds must be. Should be a criminal offense to try and destroy an innocent man's reputation, Justin Baldoni's entire career ruined. His film production company blackballed. Hoover, Swift, Reynolds, Lively and any cast or crew who sided with these cunning narcissists should be CANCELLED.
This is seriously RIDICULOUS. Not only should this guy not get a penny, but he should be put in jail for wasting peoples time. People will do anything to try to get paid and not work for it
Seeing as Deadpool literally just got involved with Disney, it’s pretty telling that dude is trying to include them in the suit. He’s just trying to make this as big as possible, which considering it’s probably gonna be his last payout in the industry, makes sense.
He’s not trying to get your support, but if he’s successful, RR might still be able to act, though some people might think twice about working with him
No idea who that guy is... nor do I care. Sounds as though he's just trying to draw attention to himself by targeting the "big dogs". Sadly, if you mess with the big dogs, you just may end up getting bitten. 😉
There’s a difference between denying sexual harassment allegations against yourself (to literally save his career and reputation) because they aren’t true, and “bullying her into dropping her case” Dumbass was he meant to just let her lie about sexual harassment charges ?????
Deadpool getting sued IRL is very Deadpool.
The part against him will be dropped
@@gothgammy666 maybe. What if it isn’t?
I’m suing Marvel as well. I was once bitten by a spider and shortly after my uncle died. He wasn’t murdered or anything but he did tell me to be more responsible once. I’m thinking 400 million should cover it.
Nobody is suing Marvel, why do people keep saying that?
I too was bitten by a spider once. I work in a prison, I know 1,500 guys who claim to be bitten by spiders, and almost 1,000 who claim to be feminists, at least three who look like Lady Dead Pool, and one who think's he's a dog.. we have a class action lawsuit on our hands!
@@TheKevinRH Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB?
Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video?
I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife.
It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person.
People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author?
Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)?
And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
Let's say, Ryan DID make this as an aside about Baldoni....should be covered by PARODY!
It should…. Could be construed as a threat also though given what happens to Nicepool and who does it to Nicepool.
@@Sharpe1502 and yet again..PARODY will getcha ridiculously far.
@kjneese
But nicepool exists in comics-?
@@TheKyle666 He actually doesn't. That variant was invented for the movie.
@@Adam1984_actually he does, he's based on HandsomPool.
Would never have made the connection until the lawsuit was announced??
Still don’t make a connection… whatever happened to sticks and stones?
Exactly
Same
Is that actually a question? Or is that your statement?
@@thelonelywhale219 Why can’t it be both?
"We'd love to have saved the documents you requested, but our offices burned with L.A."
Can't believe Ryan Reynolds started the LA Wildfire to destroy all evidence.
😂
Satire is protected speech the end
@@gothgammy666 JB and his lawyer don’t care about the parody.
Seems ridiculous. He never mentions him by name and unless you knew the story behind all the drama i would have never drawn a connection.
They were sloppy, they put "Gordon Reynolds" in the credits for both Deadpool and Wolverine and It Ends with Us.
@sonny-k8h Ryan's fictional twin brother. Just doesn't seem like a smoking gun to me. 🤷 my opinion.
@@loistreasures4094 that in itself is not. But Blake lively accused him of sexual harassment, but in Justin's lawsuit he has text messages of Blake's PR stating that it doesn't matter if it's true or not, people don't care about the truth
Everyone in the comment section is so one minded, obviously the joke wouldn’t mention Justin baldonis specific name or it would be too obvious , it was a dig at Justin just like the where is the intimacy coordinator line
@@sonny-k8hit DOES NOT MATTER SATIRE IS FREE SPEECH
I'm sure only 5-10% of people would have seen this as a character based on him! I'm part of that 90% that didn't know anything about this but
now I do and..... I'm with Ryan on this one
Even less than that, I would guess. At least nobody I know had any clue. But yeah, 100% behind Ryan and Blake on this, that douche is just being a douche because he was called out on being a douche.
Less than 1% more likely. This will blow up in this guys face.
This is definitely a streisand effect 😂.
I had no clue, now I do.
Ahh the Barbara Streisand effect
I don't understand how Ryan can be sued for this!
This is getting out of hand. My wife has been following this for weeks now. Already had Kang ruined by some accusations, if Deadpool gets ruined before Secret Wars.. don’t even want to think about it.
Don’t worry Disney has the best lawyers for better or for worse
TheActor who played Kang was a liability
Ryan Reynolds is one of the biggest assets they have and he is much beloved
Unless you did something truly truly heinous, they aren’t dropping him
@@ztcgamer9652if you think about it, if this is true it just makes his embodiment of Deadpool even more accurate lol
@ the man literally leaked the Deadpool teaser in order to get his movie made
That’s one of the most Wade things I’ve ever heard of
@@ztcgamer9652majors wasnt a liability he was literally blackballed out of success
Do u think they will drop Ryan Reynolds for this, like really
Is Reynolds allowed to attend the deposition as Nicepool, driving home that this was a parody that virtually nobody knew was about this guy?
I'm sure that would be absolutely hilarious
I wish Ryan “wrote” a character just to mock me! Lucky!!!
Would you do that about the guy you think sexually assaulted your wife because obviously, it's so funny?
Why ? 😂😅 hes not insecure about you
What a fricking reach. Ryan has been mocking his Canadian heritage in media for years. The character is the equal opposite of Deadpool and caricature of Canadians often done in media. Leave my MCU out of this.
Such a reach and honestly who cares? Too much needless legal action that totally nullifies real and respectable suits. Frick I wish I had nothing better to do. Love all people and hey we should just find a way to get back to laughing shiz off and love each other and work things out.
@ amen! Couldn’t agree more!
Not a reach at all, you just don't want to see it.
@@FineWine_andCake you’re absolutely right thank you for telling me what I want to see. I was unaware before.
Now Ryan fucked up deep
I'd never even heard of Justin Baldoni before hearing something about him and Blake Lively. Have I just been living under a rock or is he not a known name?
He's from Jane the Virgin and is a very decent guy
@@sonny-k8hahhh so you know him? People get a perception of people thinking they know them just from BS online the fact is you don't have a clue what kind of person he is, just like Reynolds no one but friends and family truly know them.
@@sonny-k8h Nope, never saw that show.
Wow, so that's him? @@sonny-k8h
Never heard of him. Should be laughed out of court.
The Streisand effect could probably be said more about Blake's actions than Justin's. She initiated the whole conflict by suing him for SH, he's just responding in an act to defend himself from her attempt to defame him and steal his credits. Most people probably didn't even know who Justin was or the other things Blake and Ryan has been accused of before she sued him, the Streisand effect.
So, ur saying a victim "initiates" the "conflict" by reporting the abuse? no. victims are not responsible for the bad behavior of others. and it wasnt just SH, he actively conspired with 2 publicists to defame her and ruin her career. the diff is, she has the evidence to prove her claim. hes just desperate and swinging at a giant steel pinata with a woofle bat. marvel is gonna make him wish HE never initiated this $hit.
The evidence does not support that and i suggest you read both lawsuits. Justin has receipts and Blake will lose in the court of public opinion. Nobody likes bullies and liars and she has been proven to be both.
@@elenaechevarria its funny how people equate their own opinion to "public opinion," and suggest anyone who thinks otherwise is ill-informed. literally nothing u said is true, and i did read both. his suit reeks of desperation, is entirely retaliatory, and he has zero evidence (which is why hes asking marvel for it), whereas her suit is already backed by co-workers and texts between the accused. as a woman, i just have to ask, why would u support this scumbag over a fellow woman speaking out about abuse? u clearly have ur opinion about blake, but since its not based on facts i can only surmise that you're jealous, and have zero predator spotting skills.
@Poesjewel So far the evidence produced points to fake charges produced by Lively.
@@Poesjewelwe get it, you see yourself in BL. You would do the same thing in her shoes and you think she is entirely justified. We believe you.
Nice report. It's easy to get defensive about a favorite character or movie, but you kept it unbiased and reminded your audience that this is only a small piece of the actual case.
This suit will be as effective as Drake’s suit against Kendrick Lamar!😂🤣😂😂
Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB?
By the way, this lawyer is one of the best lawyers in LA and if you look him up, you will see he is not a frivolous man who wastes his time on BS like “parody”, which is protected free speech. This lawyer had a reputation for being effective in representing individuals against major corporations, there’s a reason why he’s going so hard against BL and RR.
Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video?
I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife.
It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person.
People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author?
Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)?
And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
unfortunately Baldoni is just bringing negative attention to himself. no one would have connected him with Nicepool before he started talking about it.
Perfect example of The Streisand Effect
He sees a big pile of money and hopes to trick some judge into giving him a piece even though he did none of the work. I hope it bankrupts him.
Unfortunate, because there is a long history of Blake and Ryan being complete a-holes on many different sets.
Actors, crew, and directors have acknowledged the issues of working with them. Blake has only gotten worse since Ryan's success as Deadpool.
I know the fans don't want to hear it, but Ryan and Blake are not great people in real life.
They are literally bullies.
Ryan is better at hiding it
@@OpinionParade💯
The more I hear about him, the more disgusted I become.
When suing, always go for whomever has the deepest pockets.
100%! Plaintiff's law 101.
He’s not suing Marvel for money. And he’s not suing about the parody.
Don’t worry, the real reason is so deep, you probably won’t have to worry about accidentally learning about it now
@kks2360 It's ALWAYS about the money. It's Hollywood. 😆
@@ozzieanchondo537you don’t have to repeat yourself, I already told you that it’s too much work for you to invest in
It's not even parody, it's Nicepool. Baldoni thinks he is more famous than he is; no one would make the connection. But now that Justin is suing EVERYONE WILL KNOW the connection. What a dumb move.
It’s the specific lines, they reference things Baldoni said to his wife, it doesn’t matter it’s protected speech
JB’s lawyer wants everyone to know, that’s one of the purposes of him telling everyone about it publicly in the news.
You might be better off ignoring all this, it’s much deeper than you think it is
The allegations aren't purely for this though, it's that the guy had his movie hijacked by bullies. If this feeds into it then all the better for his case. I liked Ryan Reynolds but I also appreciate Hollywood is full of narcissists who don't appear to be who they seem.
Blake Lively tried to destroy his career first.
Justin who?
Didn't think the Baldoni/Lively lawsuit would spill over to here. Let's hope Ryan can prevail!
Yea ryan fucked up there deep
Why? Personally I would like to preserve the ability of Hollywood Directors to make R-Rated movies.
Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB?
By the way, this lawyer is one of the best lawyers in LA and if you look him up, you will see he is not a frivolous man who wastes his time on BS like “parody”, which is protected free speech. This lawyer had a reputation for being effective in representing individuals against major corporations, there’s a reason why he’s going so hard against BL and RR.
Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video?
I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife.
It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person.
People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author?
Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)?
And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
Aha! We get to the center of the shrubbery maze..The guy wants money to buy a NEW home and invented a problem to sue Reynolds.
So making jokes about someone (without using hate speech, obviously) is now a crime? What a world.
Nope. This lawyer is on another level, he doesn’t give a crap about the parody
10:25pm in Louisiana but I’m awake
I don’t know or care what is or isn’t real here.
But what’s funny is how nobody would have ever even thought Nicepool was a caricature of Baldoni until he made these claims.
Baldoni: “THEY’RE MAKING FUN OF ME!!”
Everyone: “Oh … huh, really?”
People online had already made the connection, that’s how his lawyer found out about it.
This guy is a literal walking contradiction, after he had his PR firm attack Blake now he thinks Ryan and the MCU actually gives a $hit about him, if he thinks he was “smeared” before, just wait for the fandom to get ahold of him! LFG❤️💛!!!
Not about the parody. But don’t worry, the real reason he tying in Marvel is so deep, you will never accidentally have to learn about it.
Short of a written document that says, “Let’s make a character to explicitly mock the guy who harassed/💩-talked my wife”, I doubt this lawsuit goes anywhere.
"harassed"
Blake is pulling a Jada Smith move, exaggerating BS and taking offense where she need not. Ryan is playing the Will Smith move, and being a dickish bully in an attempt to "defend" his wife.
Blake has a long history of being a bully and drama queen. Ryan has a history of using the Deadpool character and productions to bully specific people he doesn't like.
This behavior has been acknowledged by actors, directors, and crew members.
There is more going on here then the fans want to see.
Ryan and Blake are actually the ones in the wrong, and are acting like victims while mocking the guy they have been bullying over stuff he didn't actually do.
This is what happens when you piss off a dramatic hypocritical narcissist, and her husband thinks he needs to defend her.
@@OpinionParadeSeriously everyone in this comment section haven’t even seen all the texts and stories of Blake and Ryan
Not about the parody, lawyer doesn’t care about the parody. Deeper than that.
Blake Lively accused the director of sexual harrassment and threw the kitche nsink at him. His talent agency dropped him on the basis of her allegations before anything had been judged. So he's coming back at her, but wants all the records preserved from Disney to show that she was making fun of the situation, and didn't feel powerless or victimized by her harrasser as she claimed. I think he's more interested in the documentation that the new york times and disney have for his lawsuit against blakely.
He should sue his former talent agency. They are the ones who acted illogically.
According to the legal filings, the people Baldoni was dealing with at the PR firm were actually trying to poach clients and wreck the rep of the PR firm so they could start their own firm.
Text messages in those filings imply it was those women who set out to smear Lively in the press - both to save Baldoni should Lively go public, and to destroy the PR firm.
The only way we will truly know what happened on set is from the rest of the crew. Baldoni says they were all intimidated by Lively (and Ryan, and Taylor apparently), Lively says they were all uncomfortable with Baldoni.
Looking only at magazine articles is a really bad way to report legal news like this. Look at the legal filings and get the 'full' story
Of course, his talent agency dropped him because they also represent Lively and Reynolds. Hopefully, there's no truth to it, but if there is, Reynolds and Lively will be paying this guy a lot of money for defamation. This won't sit well with Disney at all!!!
That makes sense. I’d want to clear my name too.
She listed legitimate complaints and provided subpoenaed documents from Sony Pictures Baldoni’s regular PR firm and crisis PR firm, subpoenaed texts extracted by court forensics extraction program from Baldoni & his associates phones and subpoenaed emails from same supporting her cause of action. Sony Pictures has publicly stated they are willing to testify in court, cast & crew have made social media posts & public statements supporting her. The book author has made a public statement supporting her. But sure your misogynist account is probably what happened…
Even with a mountain of evidence and witnesses you won’t believe women and will trash them to filth yet you’ll still claim in the same breath we make false accusations because we somehow benefit from it?
Pick a lane! Because you don’t get to have it both ways!
Thanks for the update!
I'd be amazed if any of these court cases actually go anywhere.
Reading about this. The second i opened the artice and it started talking about one actor flaming another actress after a previous movies premiered i just got enraged. Imagine being that rich possibly millions of adoring fans and they still all act like children
The actress accused his of SA and he had no choice but to defend himself because she lied.
You probably think Marvel is being sued too…. Smh
Baldoni doesn't know "mocking" or "ridicule" or "intimidation" but he will 😂 the internet is crazy.
What's Baldoni hoping to find in The Marvel documents? Something flat out saying "play the character like Baldoni in a deadpool suit"? And, even if it did, that's not illegal.
JB knows that parody is not illegal… which means there is a deeper reason why his lawyer is tying Marvel in.
@@kks2360 Nope, just a little man and a big ego with more money than sense. Lawyers will indulge any client's frivolous lawsuit no matter how DOA so long as they can cut a fat check out their client.
@ sounds like you got burned. What did you do?
@ Nothing I just have actually known lawyers/judges and listened to them talk shop & $h!t for a good chunk of my life. One of my parents worked in a county courthouse naturally I'm pretty jaded abut these sort of things.
Oh BTW no matter how full BS they are never ever under any circumstance contradict a Judge in their court. I mean its a rather obvious conclusion but the number people Lawyers included that do so anyway is truly staggering.
@@Terminalsanity serious question: are you a true MCU fan that obsesses over the differences in details between the comic books and the movies and tries to find all the Marvel Easter eggs?
Let’s assume for a second that I also know a bunch of lawyers and also that we all think it’s about the money for the lawyers because “it always is”.
It’s a fact that this lawyer doesn’t care about the parody because he knows it’s protected speech. This particular lawyer also wouldn’t bother wasting his time with a parody. His office and his home burned down in that inferno in LA.
This case was presented to the public in a way where it was written like a graphic novel, very easy to read, and everyone is reading it despite the thing being 179 pages long. But this lawyer also knows exactly which parts of this case are going to be taken seriously by the judge and which ones aren’t. He’s not trying to trick anyone, he’s told everyone exactly what he’s doing.
So, Deadpool and Wolverine movie, Ryan Reynolds, Marvel Easter eggs, and a formal request to preserve documents that reference the character Nicepool sent to Marvel studios. These documents would potentially include any communications between people who worked in the production of D and W…
I can understand why people keep trying to laugh this thing off, but I can promise that most people are, at a minimum, be annoyed when figure out how much time and money RR spent on vendetta. At most, they will realize what a vindictive, cruel person RR is, not to mention insecure, and they will not be able to watch him in anything ever again.
I guess Reynolds verbally insulting Justin Baldoni in a passive aggression way is much better than slipping Chris Rock, this was Reynolds defending his wife to sue him over that one bit, seems childish, but that's Hollyweird.
Blake and Ryan have a history of bullying people over very petty things.
This guy doesn't deserve this crap, but somebody needs to start talking about this, if their bullying is EVER going to come to light.
Whenever others have spoken about the way these two act, they have been immediately slandered and/or blacklisted.
Ryan had a lot of power in Hollywood, and he uses it like a lovedrunk bullly.
Blake is Jada and Ryan is Will, for sure. Very good comparison.
THanks for the update!
I had no idea of who NicePool was supposed to be before the suits surround “It Ends With Us” broke. @Emily D Baker is an attorney who’s doing breakdowns of the many, many suits surrounding this situation…I highly suggest her breakdowns. Thanks for covering this!
Zack Peter does a much better breakdown because he actually has connections in entertainment and he consults with legal experts to make sure he understands the legal aspects.
Baldoni ultimately manages to makes himself look even worse. Kind of a roundabout way to self report
He got accused of SH and is defending himself, your dumb
Nope! His lawyer definitely knows what he is doing.
But this is on a much deeper level, not about the parody at all.
@Jhdxxbhgdscvf that is a valid stance to take as I would do the same. However, he's admitted to making comments to her. It's not as simple as defending himself for SH. He's upset about the defamation he's received through a parody character that he claims is about him regarding the SH comments he confirmed he made. I was just saying that it doesn't help his case.
@kks2360 I agree that it is a deeper level, but I believe that the parody is a catalyst.
Ohh we can sue for anything ? Well I'm using Sony for Making Horrible comic book movies
You got my support. I’ll sue Sony too 🙌💯🔥
Do it!!!!!!
I mean, I'm willing to bet that a lot of Nicepool was done off-the-cuff and didn't get fully written down.
I think it's ok with SNL & Family Guy is because they're blatantly stating who they are impersonating. If he feels like Nicepool is mocking him, he could feel like it's a deformation of character, but even that's an extreme reach.
People just want money, and will grasp at straws to get it.
Defamation my docc
@@bricio4688Wouldn’t it only be defamation if the plaintiff didn’t do the bad things being parodied? If such a case went to trial, what the person did or didn’t do would surely have to be investigated in detail.
Not about the parody, it’s on a deeper level
Fickle lawsuit. Suing for Nicepool is petty
It's not nice tbf
That's not what he's suing for 🙄
@@reggiestone730 this isn't about a lawsuit. It's about reputation and court of public opinion. Imo they are just using the lawsuit to publish all of these texts for court of public opinion
@@sonny-k8hjust say you don’t care and keep it pushin
Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB? It’s a ridiculously long period of time and almost none of the dialogue between Nicepool and Deadpool is related to the plot of the movie at all.
You remember what happened to TJ Miller, right?
By the way, this lawyer is one of the best lawyers in LA and if you look him up, you will see he is not a frivolous man who wastes his time on BS like “parody”, which is protected free speech. This lawyer had a reputation for being effective in representing individuals against major corporations, there’s a reason why he’s going so hard against BL and RR.
Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video?
I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife.
It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person.
People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author?
Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)?
And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
How nice of Baldoni to admit to some of the things Blake has accused him of….. that’s what this says to me.
Nope. Not surprised you’re not digging deeper, but I did think that as a Marvel fan, you would appreciate the Easter eggs on this one
No matter how this plays out. It is certain that Deadpool did NOT like nicepool... Lol
How long ago did this movie get written and go into production?
2023 I think
Astonishingly thrilled to see future Marvel content but agitated to have missed Xmen97 finale however excited to be able to catch Deadpool & Wolverine.
Great video nice that you’re not an AI voice got my subscription
This dude needs to leave Deadpool alone! Idk if it's referring him. It's satire! Honestly I had no idea and would of probably never knew till this lawsuit!
😂😅 leave deadpool alone how old are you 5
@Arsus-gp6ih You must be a little slow! So I'll explain deeper if you can understand. Bringing the franchise into this could have repercussions in the future!
@@sinont7051 the man got accused of SH and SA, he’s fighting for his reputation and ability to continue his career. They are only going after him because he finally stood up to them and told them no.
Nobody can take a joke anymore. Come on, it's Deadpool. ❤
This law suit is hard to define as a lawsuit when it’s more of a troll tactic!
By not saying Jason's name its still protected, legally he could be talking about anyone, doesn't matter how much it feels like Jason is being talked about he was not named
None of this is about the parody. This lawyer is on a different level
Great stuff michael!
Man’s lawyers sends letter to Disney execs.
Man is never heard from again.
Court will dismiss, even if his notes are left behind a year, with that guy's name, in the movie, never said his name.
Not about the parody
"Reynolds made fun of me in a movie"
Called you out by name?
"No"
Did he portray you a certain negative way?
"Yes! As someone nice!!! I am gonna sue his pants off!!"
You tried. Swing and a miss. Take a peak at the actual lawsuit, you might learn something.
@@GrizzlyX If the details have to be spelt out in that level of detail for the average viewer of the movie to catch, it is hard to claim it was any meaningful attack. Personally, I just thought it was a parody of a Nicolas Cage Deadpool.
@@nctpti2073 this lawyer is legit, he doesn’t give a crap about the parody. This man is on a different level
@@kks2360 Legit lawyers are not always correct.
@@nctpti2073 that’s true. Not surprised you didn’t address the rest of what I said. It does require actual work to do so
Thanks for the news
I doubt they'll be able to prove nice pools lines were directed at him. I think the headline is what he wanted.
Not about the parody, but part of the reason is in the Marvel Easter eggs
No, proving that is the easy part. "Gordon Reynolds" was listed in the credits.
Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB?
By the way, this lawyer is one of the best lawyers in LA and if you look him up, you will see he is not a frivolous man who wastes his time on BS like “parody”, which is protected free speech. This lawyer had a reputation for being effective in representing individuals against major corporations, there’s a reason why he’s going so hard against BL and RR.
Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video?
I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife.
It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person.
People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author?
Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)?
And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
It's circumstantial evidence. The alleged "parody" of Baldoni, if that indeed is what it was, would only be relevant, and identified by those who were in the know. The average (billions of people) moviegoers, myself included, did not connect what Nicepool said to Baldoni. So (IMHO), if he's going for defamation of character, it's hardly damaging his public, image, if the alleged "joke" is found liable.
I don’t think it was intended for audiences to actually KNOW it’s based on Baldoni. It was more between Ryan and Blake to mock Justin like an inside joke so only they knew who Nicepool is based on. It’s pretty obvious it’s based on him. If it wasn’t for all the false accusations and defamation that would severely hurt Baldoni’s reputation he might’ve let it pass but it’s a connection to their unprofessional behavior that can be used against them.
He’s also getting accused of SH from blake so he’s defending his image from that
Marvel audiences have been trained for years to detect Easter eggs, you will be disappointed in the fact that there are so many in this film that point to his exact identity. You think RR doesn’t want you to know how clever he is?
I heard Legolas is also suing for Nicepool looking similar to him!
Cool content bro 👌 😎 👍 🙌 💯
I hope Hasbro can still make a Marvel Legends figure of Nicepool.
It's gonna be hard to prove that nice pools references are specifically about baldoni without him using his name
Not at all. You will be disappointed in the numerous Easter eggs that point to his identity. You think RR doesn’t want you to know how clever he is?
This is wild and I don’t want any issues with Deadpool going forward I hope it’s throw out.
The legal framework i think they are going for would be one of slander/libel/harassment. Slander & libel require that something untrue was said that caused an injury. Since Baldoni is a public figure, the higher level requirement of actual malice also applies. However, I believe this will fail because nobody knew anything about Nice Pool being satire of Baldoni. Therefore, there was no injury until he outed himself. The harassment part is a little more nebulous, but I believe it will ultimately fail on actual injury and 1st amendment grounds. You are allowed to mock someone publicly as long as you do not slander, libel, or threaten them. Again, because Baldoni is a public individual, he will have to reach a higher bar to prove harassment. This is going nowhere, in my opinion. It smacks of desperation and legal intimidation. I suspect his main lawsuit is failing, and he is searching for something to prop it up. Or that Renyolds and Lively will just get fed up and settle. I doubt that. I don't know about Lively, but Renyolds appears to be a very determined and headstrong individual. I would not be surprised if he fights it all the way on principal alone.
Nope. Think deeper, specifically about which Marvel Easter eggs about the parody are present and where in the film they are.
Then consider the movie making process and how much time is devoted to writing and development.
Consider who would be discussing it.
You might get to where I’m pointing if you start there
@kks2360 Dude, if you have to be this cryptic in your response to make it sound reasonable, a jury is never going to buy it. Either point something out specifically or go away. The law is about facts and actual injury. Not innuendo and speculation.
I am not saying they didn't sneak in a few jabs. Just that they don't rise to the level of slander/libel/harassment because there is no injury from them, if present. On top of that, as a public figure, Baldoni is going to have to meet a much higher legal bar that makes it much harder to prove.
If you have examples, you need to justify them in the legal framework of being 1) false, 2) provably malicious, and 3) causing actual injury through reputational damage.
@ I am talking about actual legal strategy. But I am curious to see who actual figures it out. One or two people have good theories about the reasoning.
But the biggest clue is the lawyer. He is not a frivolous man, he represents some of the most influential people in the country and he does not strike me as a person who wastes his time.
But if you think you’re better at this than he is, I’m fine with taking your word for it.
@kks2360 i am not better. I just require specifics for an argument. All you have given is vague hints and innuendo. Unfortunately for you, the legal system also requires evidence to make a case. So, if you are going to make the argument that this is not frivolous, you need to provide examples.
As far as the reputation of the lawyer goes, that is far from definitive. A lawyer will represent their client even if they don't agree with them because they are an advocate, not the one on trial. Given enough money, any lawyer would take on a case they personally believe to be unwinnable and/or frivolous. To meet their ethical obligations, they will advise their client as such, but continue to represent the client if the client decides to proceed. At best, a lawyer's reputation is a vague indicator of a case's potential and not something I would hang my hat on. Good lawyers catch bad cases and lose all the time. It is part of the job. Once they accept the retainer and begin the case, they are ethically obligated to see the case to the end, in most situations. The exception is if the client terminates their representation. So, this could have been a case with initial an initial plausible base that fell apart, and the lawyer is now stuck with.
Again, your argument fails because you didn't provide any actionable examples. Please provide them in your next reply. Or at least state an actual theory that can be debated. Anything less at this point just indicates equal measures of arrogance and ignorance.
@ 😆😆😆 I mean, I appreciate you educating me, but you do know I’m not the actual lawyer, right?
You seem to be a pretty smart guy, I’m sure you’ll get there eventually
I hope this blows up and Reynolds is innocent.
Ryan and Blake have a long history of bullying people and making exaggerated accusations.
Whenever anyone talks about it, they usually get blacklisted, publicly slandered, or the entire thing just gets swept under the rug.
Nothing with come of this, other than perhaps more of the public being aware that these two people are literally narcissistic bullies in real life.
Never meet your heroes.
THIS IS CRAZY!!!
_(said in the voice of Christopher Walken)_
Hopefully Reynolds does lose so he stops making shitty movies
The context that was stripped was that any of those lines had anything to do with him... Good job letting us all know, Baldoni... The Streisand effect is real.
They want everyone to know, the more, the better. But this lawyer is legit, he doesn’t give a crap about the parody
You did a WAY better job at covering this than Emergency Awesome! Kudos
Its so.much more than the Deadpool joke. So much more. He and his wife has lied about another person, and tried to ruin him with those lies. Watch popcorned planets video about the lawsuit documents.
This was very well said
Awesome video
Good stuff Michael
You know if Ryan said in interviews that nicepool was a make a wish request from a kid instead of an original character I doubt it would’ve been sued.
Wouldn’t have mattered what he said it was, the clues, as always, are in the Marvel Easter eggs. Can’t unsee it once you see it.
None of this is about the parody, his lawyer doesn’t give a crap about that
Ryan and Blake are total bullies. Will never watch anything with Ryan and Blake again. They need to be sued into oblivion. She's literally Amber Heard 2.0 and Ryan is no better.
I know way too much about this. Let’s be real. Allegations aside, I wouldn’t put it past Reynolds. Everything good gets ruined by bonehead moves fueled by overblown egos.
Ryan AND Blake both have a history of bullying people on set and making exaggerated claims. Fame has gone to their heads like the Rock, and they have been total a-holes behind the scenes.
This has been acknowledged by cast, crew, and directors. They bully people on set, knowing nothing will happen because they are the star, they try to steal control of movies from the hired directors, and they gaslight people by pretending that they never bullied or mocked anyone. They actually play the victim, which is so insane.
The fans appear to be allergic to reality on this one.
These two have been dicks for decades.
This Baldoni guy didn't do anything to deserve this.
Great vid and love the movie ❤
Baldoni sounds like he doesn’t like to actually work; just sue people. Ah hell, I just got served papers by his lawyers…
Why would RR spend so much time and money making a parody of JB?
By the way, this lawyer is one of the best lawyers in LA and if you look him up, you will see he is not a frivolous man who wastes his time on BS like “parody”, which is protected free speech. This lawyer had a reputation for being effective in representing individuals against major corporations, there’s a reason why he’s going so hard against BL and RR.
Has someone put all the clips of Nicepool together end to end in a continuous run and then played the dance video footage JB’s lawyer just dropped before or after all in one video?
I think once someone does that, it will be much more obvious how RR based Nicepool on JB. The Nicepool characters simultaneously shows you what RR thinks of Justin’s appearance, Justin’s openness with his life, Justin’s generosity with people that he works with or shares his life with, and how RR perceived Justin’s interactions with his wife.
It also reveals RR’s jealousy of Justin’s looks and Justin’s kind personality that seems impervious to insult or negativity, which RR seems to find unrealistic and annoying, but only because it seems so effortless on JB’s part that RR literally cannot understand how JB seems to be just naturally that good of a person.
People will have to come to their own conclusions about why Deadpool treats Nicepool the way he does at the movie. Do the “100 bloody thirsty Deadpools”, represent the cast of IEWU? Is Ladypool the leader of the Deadpool Corp? Why is Nicepool never seen as a part of the Deadpool Corp, he’s always encountered in isolation with only Dogpool by his side? Does Dogpool actually represent the author, Colleen Hoover, and Deadpool is trying to get the ownership rights of the book and the author?
Is Ladypool aware that Nicepool does not regenerate, but all other Deadpool’s do? If so, is she purposely trying to kill Nicepool when she uses her Uzis to shoot while Deadpool uses Nicepool as a body shield? If not, then why do they stop the gunfire when Wolverine holds up the dog (if you say it’s just because the dog is cute, you might not be a hardcore student of MCU Easter eggs)?
And what do the solid gold pistoleros represent?
But his mistake was allowing Disney lawyers to get involved. Stupid move
this lawsuit will go nowhere.just someone tring to line their pockets.
Wasn’t Miller quietly removed because of Me Too?
This dude is trying his hardest to never work in Hollywood again.
If he is guilty, I don't he deserves to complain. If he's not, then he might
At this rate, it'll turn into a Canada v Deadpool class action lawsuit
Anchorman would say : wow that escalated quickly
That’s actually a crazy iykyk situation between Ryan Reynolds and Justin baldonies parties ..that would have never been picked up on if it weren’t for the law suit
It was picked up before the lawsuit. That’s how his lawyer found out about it
A lot of money around Deadpool and Marvel…when are they not being sued
Any lines Nnicepool said in the movie about Baldoni - I didn't get the reference.
I dont think Baldoni will sue Disney. It's about showing a pattern of bullying and threatening behavior by Ryan and Blake. Just think of Dogpool as a metaphor for the It End With Us movie, that Deadpool wants to take from Nicepool who ends up being killed by Ladypool.
Ohhh wow that’s so true, forgot about that, he does take over the dog.
@@mindhy3he’s not suing Disney, parody is not illegal or defamatory. He’s asking them to preserve their documents regarding the Deadpool and Wolverine movie.
Why can’t they all just get along?
Reynolds tried to buy the movie rights from Justin Baldoni. Justin declined. Then things went down hill from there. If there is a "morality clause" in the contract it means, if Justin has been convicted of improper/criminal behaviour, the book rights for the film automatically switch back to Colleen Hoover who begged Justin to cast Blake in the first place, then supported Blake with the fake sexual assault allegations.
A film about Domestic Violence got undermined. Ryan changing the script, abusing the director, and getting him removed from his talent agency. Blake directing the director and demanding new wardrobe for her character of a book she did not read.
What an insecure, unhinged psychopath Reynolds must be. Should be a criminal offense to try and destroy an innocent man's reputation, Justin Baldoni's entire career ruined. His film production company blackballed. Hoover, Swift, Reynolds, Lively and any cast or crew who sided with these cunning narcissists should be CANCELLED.
This is seriously RIDICULOUS. Not only should this guy not get a penny, but he should be put in jail for wasting peoples time. People will do anything to try to get paid and not work for it
It’s not about the parody, that’s not illegal, that would be a waste of time.
Seeing as Deadpool literally just got involved with Disney, it’s pretty telling that dude is trying to include them in the suit. He’s just trying to make this as big as possible, which considering it’s probably gonna be his last payout in the industry, makes sense.
Nope. There is a legitimate reason they are included, but it’s not the parody itself, that is protected speech
Bro thinks taking on Deadpool will give him public support? Bros really wrong.
He’s not trying to get your support, but if he’s successful, RR might still be able to act, though some people might think twice about working with him
I don't know anything about this but Baldoni should be fined heavily by the court for frivolous lawsuit and wasting taxpayer's time and money.
Only if it actually gets to court. Does he still have to pay if he wins in court?
Not showing Blake Lively’s face as LadyPool was such a miss
She only did the voice, stunt double for the scenes in the movie
Would have never made the connection unless this lawsuit came out
Many people made the connection, that’s how his lawyer found out about it
No idea who that guy is... nor do I care. Sounds as though he's just trying to draw attention to himself by targeting the "big dogs". Sadly, if you mess with the big dogs, you just may end up getting bitten. 😉
I'd be really surprised if he actually has a case, probably just using this to bully her into dropping her case.
There’s a difference between denying sexual harassment allegations against yourself (to literally save his career and reputation) because they aren’t true, and “bullying her into dropping her case” Dumbass was he meant to just let her lie about sexual harassment charges ?????
He’d be happy if she would stop trying to ruin his life because her feelings got hurt.
I thought nicepool was based off of the comic HotPool 😂 🤔guess not🤣
He never mentioned him, if you FEEL like it's targeting you it's because YOU feel like it is you.
In the Marvel Easter eggs. His lawyer doesn’t care about the parody, this is on a different level.
This is ridiculous guy needs to get a grip 😂
Let's wait and see😂, you won't be seeing Dead Pool for a minute 😂, i guess, Dr. doom erase him from the MCU😂
Dude will wind up blackballed in Hollywood.
Dude ain’t no one know in tell you said something now it’s hilarious 😂😂😂
I don't know who is right and who is wrong between Baldoni and Lively, but this just seems to be grasping at straws by Baldoni's attorneys.