Yeah the ending should’ve been you end up working again for Perseus and you kill park and Adler but the US still manage to stop the nukes and woods and mason survive to keep bo2 canon
Yeah I agree. I think where it's a soft reboot they won't really stick to the lore too much so they might rewrite the future. But for me this game felt like a bit of reskin of modern warfare and then story was like sledgehammer trying to do a knock off black ops. It didn't feel like Treyarch at their best, it reminded me of sledgehammer
I'm sure that was planned at some point because in the good ending the only way I don't see Adler being in BO2 is if he dies in that draw or both he and Bell die. I wish Activision didn't fuck over Cold War by cutting development by a 1/3. They should realize they don't need a new COD every single year.
@@statin78foryournews99 That's a fact - plus, it was obvious he didn't listen to the cutscenes. That is slightly irritating as others manage to do better than him
You know their is more than one Perseus. In real life, Perseus was just a code name and so many spies were called Perseus when they weren’t actually Perseus. That’s why he was never found.
@@monki6304 too much of a risk he was russian he knew too much there is a chance he would remmeber who he is they won't take Th st chance so they kill him
I like Inkslasher's ending explained video. Imo he gives a solid theory on why Adler killed Bell. Even though the Higher Ups believed Bell was "On their side now" and content with his performance. I do agree it's the most cliche ending, but also the most realistic both irl and in game. Adler is a very secretive man, who won't tell a straight story about his scar (there's dialogue in the safe house to ask him how he got his scar and he'll tell you 3 different, equally outlandish, stories).
Honestly, the evil ending was by far the most impactful to both the player, all the other characters, and to the story. After being brain washed and tortured by your friends, losing your entire identity, and having that devotion to the motherland, turning on your "allies" and butchering them is so much more meaningful than just another generic "save the world" ending. Not just in the story, but in the gameplay. Beyond bland. The slow mo shots as you kill the name characters though, and their dialogue as you do (and in what order you do) is phenomenal. A very ambitious ending, and one that is only weakened by the epilogue where the game exposits the consequences of your choices. However, the evil ending really couldn't be canon since the nukes go off and, presumably, the US is invaded. Regardless of whether Woods or Mason die, that alone would prevent Black Ops 2 from happening. Having said that, the best way for the "good" ending to play out would have been to pretend to be allied with Perseus, get in and wipe out the organisation's high ranking members, abort the launch sequences, and kill anyone who might know anything. Perhaps even pretend to have captured Adler to earn Perseus' trust. This would not only have had more interesting gameplay and story, giving closure to the Perseus arc, but would also have made Adler's eventual betrayal even more surprising if you had the chance to betray him and join Perseus, and he could witness that you didn't. Heck, you could even make that a QTE fight like in the evil ending, make it more definitive rather than a cut to black as you both draw your guns. Anyway, that is just my two cents. Loved all your Black Ops playthroughs, and broadly agree that the canon ending (and the epilogue exposition for them all) drag the game down from great to mediocre.
Okay, so there's a few indication that Persius isn't real. I mean more than "as Persius can be an individual" thing The moustached man with the coat, the "Persius" you see in this ending might be not even present or even real. So what's the proof? First, first time you see him his subtitle reads "Russian Soldier" when clearly anyone will recognize the outfit, regardless of the gas mask. Why his identity is concealed with so little effort? Did you just imagined a random soldier to be Persius? The more damming proof is that Adler don't even acknowledged his presence. He lays there, defeated, with his nemesis supposedly on the door and all he talked is Bell. Even so far as rattling how he cured Bell's nicotine addiction if you let him talk long enough. Also he never did anything really, only handing you a gun in the beginning, which we discussed earlier, and started to radio Solovetsky, which you're the one who said the word. Didn't even interfere when Adler tries to cut your throat, and we've seen worse psychosis and hallucinations with Mason. But didn't we see him in Cuba, you said? Remember, there's no confirmation that he's "The Persius" he's could be a random agent. So really, there's a strong case to be made here.
I was so sad when you got to the zombies part but you didn't kill one so you instantly got the red door. I wanted to see you freak out lol. Ya know that part in the dark caves when you had a flashlight and 1911.
It’s saying a lot when a royal marine approves of the “lie” ending There’s no good/bad here, save the world be treated as an expendable Or watch the world burn but be welcomed back as a friend
I find it hard to believe people can compare dying but saving half of Europe to living but killing millions of people on the same level of how good or bad it is like can you guys not see the problem with that
I wish there was an ending where during the ambush you could Kill "Perseus" and take his radio, cancel the detonation, Kill Adler for what he did to you, then leave Woods and Mason to fend off the remaining Russian soldiers, that way Bell gets his/her revenge and goes of the grid for good or starts a new life, Europe isn't nuked, Perseus is dead and that ties in Woods and Mason's story form BO2 where Woods is captured and Mason has to find him
But Luke, if the bad ending was the only ending, and we established that Block Ops universe is now in the same mw 2019 universe (with Zakhaev and Burger town), you cant go with the bad ending cuse all Europe goes atomic. So no London clean house mission 40 years later because no London :(
@@nichtstern5147 Not how it works though. Neither of the bad endings can be canon because the nukes can’t be allowed to detonate or else BO2 doesn’t happen, especially if Mason and Woods die
They could've forced you to be evil as bell, then on the last mission mason and woods escape (you play as them) then you play as bell and kill the rest Sets up the next Black Ops
@@bacon_0472 never said black ops 2 though, I mean if they do continue it but it's not likely with it being black ops "cold war" not just like black ops like the others
@@callumjones7561 There's probably gonna be a collab between MW 2019 and this version of Black Ops cuz they take place in one universe. Zakheav plays an important role (maybe) because remember "Mr. Z" from MW coop missions?
The good ending actually makes sense, Here me out. But in black ops 2(after cold war) we don't see adler or bell during that period and plus even if they survive it would fuck up the story in general
it wouldn't be the main since it would affect black ops 2, so the accurate one is where you die when you try to ambush or the one where you and Adler shoot each other
The ending you got for me is the best because you and Adler shoot that can lead up to another game which can show a mystery did you survive and plus I just hate when woods die
I Think they should’ve mixed it so Woods, Hudson and Mason go to solvetski to stop the detonation. And Bell, Park and Adler go to Duga to find perseus.
10:15 I flinched when he did this for some reason 😂 because after playing through the first ending, adler betrays us while I was scared that Perseus might do the same 😂
Wow I really wanted to see your reaction on this! Keep the great work bro! I am happy I got my free copy for this game from another small giveaway! Very nice!
That "good" ending (with telling the truth) may not seem like a good ending for the game, but we must admit that Bell/Adler's death was more of a sacrifice to save Europe from destruction. (Correct me if I'm wrong) Bell was part of the Soviet army and was later taken by the group consisting of Adler and Sims and all that. Bell had the information they needed to kill Perseus - And Bell was originally in Perseus's team, which meant that Adler's group would (probably) betray Bell after Perseus is dead. So... ye.. you get it. You either have a choice to either: come back to the Soviet's team and go home peacefully, or go against the Soviet's team to save Europe and be later betrayed.
BAD ENDING: Killing Woods and Mason And that the communists explode Greenlight nuclear bombs across Europe by blaming the US. 6:20 Luke: tHiS iS tHE gOOd eNDiNG
Cold War: Has multiple endings you can pick from if you attentive enough Luke: *picks ending he doesn’t like* This game has a weak ending Cold War: Has ending Luke likes Luke: This should have been the ending Cold War:
It can’t be canon though. I have to agree with Luke though that it would have been better if Bell saying fuck you to Adler and going back to the Soviets but having Mason and Woods escape (with some kind of workaround for the nukes) so it doesn’t fuck up the BO2 storyline was the main “good ending” and then the one where you help Adler and then get iced is just an alternate “bad ending”
To shut down all of the people saying, the reason why the first ending (good ending) was like that, was because Mason and Woods are in BO2. This game is a reboot, that’s why Imran Zakhaev is in the game. This story is now in the Universe of MW2019.
What makes you think that the ending you got was ‘the main ending’? There were literally two choices, you choose one of them, you could have just as easily choose the other one. It was all in your hands.
6:51 - Hey, Luke. Don't forget that If the bad ending was the main ending of cold war, then Black Ops 2 wouldn't make sense. Since Mason would be dead, so his son wouldn't be born. And woods. Hudson would be the only one that survived if the bad ending was the main ending with Half Of Europe crawling up USA's ass trying to kill them. So, yeah. That's all I wanted to say. EDIT: OH never mind, I heard you say that in the video.
The issue with the bad ending is black ops 2 and 3 are still cannon but mainly 2 is the important one since mason and woods are still alive in black ops 2 so killing them wouldn’t work since it’s a prequel, they could have made a bad ending where park, Lazar, and Adler all live then die in the ambush and woods and mason find out later and set up another game to hunt down Perseus and Bell
SOVIET Ending is true ending! Also, they could have made this a different timeline but they decided for some reason to add it on top the existing timeline.
The "bad ending" is the worst Imo, Watching Mason Woods & Park/Lazar was painful, I loved Adler he is maybe my favorite character out of all COD behind Reznov, he was so much LIKE a CIA , not Hudson that doesn't want to face his decision, Adler was hella badass, I totally understand ppl getting pissed at him bc he shots Bell in the "good" ending" but its what he had to do. I hope we see him in other COD.
Let’s think about it, Adler was never seen at all in Black Ops 2, in the past missions, Mason Woods had a good connection with Adler, clearly. So my guess is that both Bell and Adler shot each other since Bell nor Adler is mentioned in Black Ops 2, (just a rumour, don’t get toxic etc.)
Luke saying that this should have been the only ending is like saying there should only be one flavor of ice cream, they gave you two endings and a choice so that those who don't like this ending or wanted to be a good guy could choose the opposite ending and those who wanted to be the bad guy could choose the other ending that's the whole point there's an option for you to make so you can't judge them for not making this one the only ending because it would just make people more disappointed if they didn't have one
Adler can't let a ex perususe live knowing what bell knows and end up coming back for revenge that's why he chose to kill bell rather then keep him alive.
Two things, both endings are the main ending. If you choose to lie, that's the main ending but if you choose to be honest, that's also the main ending. Also if you think back to the arash shooting you scene at the airstrip, if you choose to be honest he was actually jealous of how far you are in perseus' ranks but if you choose to lie, it was all a ploy to leave you there and hope that the americans find you
None of the bad endings would make sense because the multiplayer storyline is after the campaign and Adler is a playable so is Park so both of them have to live no matter what
I agree with you on the bad ending where you kill Adler. It would've been great if Woods and Mason escaped in that one though. See in the good ending, it makes sense that CIA wanted to take down any liabilities, but I believe game devs could've made the direction better, I mean in the whole game you're tracking down this person named perseus ( one person according to CIA) but in the good ending you didn't even see that guy at all. You simply save the day and then Adler finishes you, everything builds up so much then simply goes down. Whereas the bad ending where you kill everyone is a kind of ending that leaves you with wow and lives up the standards set by BO1 and BO2, though it isn't canon..
Woods: you can’t kill me
Also woods: dies in the bad ending
Bell: "It'll only take one"
Bell and Menendez will be such good friends with the bad ending v1.
@@Rares_G4H They'd be unstoppable, they'll kill all the protagonist from Bo2 together with no problem.
Bell: “and I took that personally”
*Good ending
Park: *dies
Luke:OHHH THIS IS A GOOD ENDING
The Anti-Simp route.
yea
Да
He ain’t a simp
The best ending comrades, remember no simp
When Luke says that the evil ending is a good ending : "Well, that was unexpected".
I would have said, "That shit was a flying kickapow of unrealistic jitteries!" Now THAT, would be unexpected.
I agree
He is Perseus
I died laughing
Sounds like communist propaganda, but ok!
They couldn’t since this takes place before black ops 2
"Ramirez, shoot down that helicopter!"
Ramirez defend the burger town
wait if this takes place before black ops 2 and its in the 80's or something then why do people say that its in the same universe as cod mw 2019 ?!?!
@@magic_bread2428 cause zakhaev is young and not old as hell
@@magic_bread2428 talking about the MW trilogy, had nothing to do with the reboot
U didn’t watch the cutscene 😭😭😭😭
Where the nukes went of
U skipped it 😭😭😭😭😭
Shame! ;_;
The whole video is pointless now lmao
that cut scene wasn't that cool plus he saw it two times while trying to skip it.
He skipped both of them he didn’t see it at all
He probably thought it was the same cutscenes when he played the game.
@@andrewwassef7793 eh who cares that's his fault
Yeah the ending should’ve been you end up working again for Perseus and you kill park and Adler but the US still manage to stop the nukes and woods and mason survive to keep bo2 canon
Yeah I agree. I think where it's a soft reboot they won't really stick to the lore too much so they might rewrite the future. But for me this game felt like a bit of reskin of modern warfare and then story was like sledgehammer trying to do a knock off black ops. It didn't feel like Treyarch at their best, it reminded me of sledgehammer
I agree
That should’ve been bad ending v2 because v1 was epic and very fun to kill ur ex protagonist
I'm sure that was planned at some point because in the good ending the only way I don't see Adler being in BO2 is if he dies in that draw or both he and Bell die.
I wish Activision didn't fuck over Cold War by cutting development by a 1/3. They should realize they don't need a new COD every single year.
Well If you have the good ending that’s basically cannon cuz no nukes go off so that’s really the only ending that’s cannon
Who tf skips cutscenes when u haven't even played that part
Yeah annoyed the heck out of me
Me too! 😫
One of the reasons why I can’t really watch Luke anymore. If you’re gonna react to the video, watch the whole thing.
@@zinsurge470 fax
This guy
He’s salty he didn’t choose the bad guys route. I feel like he should’ve just replayed it and done it. Not just watched it
Ah well, can't please everyone.
Absolutely, that's why he said multiple times:"they should have just left this ending in!" He should have listened to the cutscenes better 🤷🏻♂️
@@Joe-el2wx Hell yeeUH my doodlinger!
Bruh you can’t be pleased with anything.go watch someone else
@@statin78foryournews99 That's a fact - plus, it was obvious he didn't listen to the cutscenes. That is slightly irritating as others manage to do better than him
06:06 "Perseus" is basically Soviet Captain Price
“GET UP PRIVATE BELL, SOVIETS LEAD THE WAY”
You know their is more than one Perseus. In real life, Perseus was just a code name and so many spies were called Perseus when they weren’t actually Perseus. That’s why he was never found.
Hahahahahahaha I thought I only saw that reference to mw1
@@VitoScaletta1951 yeah but other than Perseus and Soviet Soldier, there are no other names for him
Soviet spy’s still around in 2020?....🤔
Imagine not actually reacting to the Full ending and not being able to understand it because you skipped the cut screens.
Gunna cry
@@kingjudusthememe8637 Ladies first
@@malachi3749 exactly so go on
BTW the ending where adler shoots ypu is realistically accurate
Getting rid of the asset that knows too much and has no use anymore, with it finding the truth, it's a liability.
Any irl examples? 🤔
@@monki6304 too much of a risk he was russian he knew too much there is a chance he would remmeber who he is they won't take Th st chance so they kill him
@@phantom__1117 oh well 🤷♂️🤷♂️
@@Bylov6812 yeah that is what inkslasher said
He didn't watch the cut scene where Perseus obliterates half of Europe
I feel there should've been at least 2 missions more with some grey morals that would give you more reasons to lie to Adler.
The first Time I saw "Perseus" taking of his Mask I just thought "Is that Shepherd??"
Proof that Bell can defeat Thanos easily
I like Inkslasher's ending explained video. Imo he gives a solid theory on why Adler killed Bell. Even though the Higher Ups believed Bell was "On their side now" and content with his performance. I do agree it's the most cliche ending, but also the most realistic both irl and in game. Adler is a very secretive man, who won't tell a straight story about his scar (there's dialogue in the safe house to ask him how he got his scar and he'll tell you 3 different, equally outlandish, stories).
Honestly, the evil ending was by far the most impactful to both the player, all the other characters, and to the story. After being brain washed and tortured by your friends, losing your entire identity, and having that devotion to the motherland, turning on your "allies" and butchering them is so much more meaningful than just another generic "save the world" ending. Not just in the story, but in the gameplay. Beyond bland. The slow mo shots as you kill the name characters though, and their dialogue as you do (and in what order you do) is phenomenal. A very ambitious ending, and one that is only weakened by the epilogue where the game exposits the consequences of your choices.
However, the evil ending really couldn't be canon since the nukes go off and, presumably, the US is invaded. Regardless of whether Woods or Mason die, that alone would prevent Black Ops 2 from happening. Having said that, the best way for the "good" ending to play out would have been to pretend to be allied with Perseus, get in and wipe out the organisation's high ranking members, abort the launch sequences, and kill anyone who might know anything. Perhaps even pretend to have captured Adler to earn Perseus' trust. This would not only have had more interesting gameplay and story, giving closure to the Perseus arc, but would also have made Adler's eventual betrayal even more surprising if you had the chance to betray him and join Perseus, and he could witness that you didn't. Heck, you could even make that a QTE fight like in the evil ending, make it more definitive rather than a cut to black as you both draw your guns.
Anyway, that is just my two cents. Loved all your Black Ops playthroughs, and broadly agree that the canon ending (and the epilogue exposition for them all) drag the game down from great to mediocre.
Park: dies
Luke: this is a good ending
Allmost everyone: this is a good ending
Also you didn't watch the bad ending cutscene, basically Perseus successfully detonated the nukes in Europe
Just Monika
Is it me or his rectangle getting bigger :v
Woods: dies
Original Human: THIS ENDING IS WAY BETTER!!!
I dont even call the "good ending" the good ending. I call it the cannon ending because Black ops 2 is still cannon
Okay, so there's a few indication that Persius isn't real. I mean more than "as Persius can be an individual" thing
The moustached man with the coat, the "Persius" you see in this ending might be not even present or even real.
So what's the proof? First, first time you see him his subtitle reads "Russian Soldier" when clearly anyone will recognize the outfit, regardless of the gas mask.
Why his identity is concealed with so little effort? Did you just imagined a random soldier to be Persius?
The more damming proof is that Adler don't even acknowledged his presence. He lays there, defeated, with his nemesis supposedly on the door and all he talked is Bell. Even so far as rattling how he cured Bell's nicotine addiction if you let him talk long enough.
Also he never did anything really, only handing you a gun in the beginning, which we discussed earlier, and started to radio Solovetsky, which you're the one who said the word.
Didn't even interfere when Adler tries to cut your throat, and we've seen worse psychosis and hallucinations with Mason.
But didn't we see him in Cuba, you said? Remember, there's no confirmation that he's "The Persius" he's could be a random agent. So really, there's a strong case to be made here.
It annoys me when you didn’t look at the whole context. You skipped the very essential parts from the end.
You should've watched the cutscenes for the endings.
I was so sad when you got to the zombies part but you didn't kill one so you instantly got the red door. I wanted to see you freak out lol. Ya know that part in the dark caves when you had a flashlight and 1911.
The bad ending v1 won't work cuz bo2 already had wood and Mason alive so killing them would cancel the entire game
It’s saying a lot when a royal marine approves of the “lie” ending
There’s no good/bad here, save the world be treated as an expendable
Or watch the world burn but be welcomed back as a friend
I rather be appreciated
I find it hard to believe people can compare dying but saving half of Europe to living but killing millions of people on the same level of how good or bad it is like can you guys not see the problem with that
@@kristiwhite565 No
Yeah the evil one is pretty selfish honestly
Nah fuck the world I got my comrades
Tbh I’m kind of mad that he didn’t watch the nuke detonations. He might have watched it in a other video but like :/.
I wish there was an ending where during the ambush you could Kill "Perseus" and take his radio, cancel the detonation, Kill Adler for what he did to you, then leave Woods and Mason to fend off the remaining Russian soldiers, that way Bell gets his/her revenge and goes of the grid for good or starts a new life, Europe isn't nuked, Perseus is dead and that ties in Woods and Mason's story form BO2 where Woods is captured and Mason has to find him
The bad ending just messed up the timeline for black ops 2 right
@@s_and6040 you're right it also destroys mw 2019 and warzone
It's not canon of course but it's a hell of a lot more interesting
Oh MW timeline I didn't know till now
Also I really wish he played the ending instead of reacting but it is what it is
He could've played the bad ending if he wants to
They’re setting up for the sequel where you get Perseus, hence why you didn’t get him in this game
You skipped the final cutscene wtf lol
But Luke, if the bad ending was the only ending, and we established that Block Ops universe is now in the same mw 2019 universe (with Zakhaev and Burger town), you cant go with the bad ending cuse all Europe goes atomic. So no London clean house mission 40 years later because no London :(
Even if not connected to MW2019 no BO2 either.
Well, if you choose it than it is the real ending. The choice is yours on how you want to end the story.
Its not really considering the "good" ending is the canon ending
@@Bevsworld04 That's right , but you still choose your real ending
@@nichtstern5147 Not how it works though. Neither of the bad endings can be canon because the nukes can’t be allowed to detonate or else BO2 doesn’t happen, especially if Mason and Woods die
They could've forced you to be evil as bell, then on the last mission mason and woods escape (you play as them) then you play as bell and kill the rest
Sets up the next Black Ops
If there is another black ops carrying on, they'll just continue it from the bell and Adler having a shot off part
Makes no sense, when Bell is bad Perseus nukes half of Europe what never happened in bo2
@@bacon_0472 never said black ops 2 though, I mean if they do continue it but it's not likely with it being black ops "cold war" not just like black ops like the others
@@callumjones7561 There's probably gonna be a collab between MW 2019 and this version of Black Ops cuz they take place in one universe. Zakheav plays an important role (maybe) because remember "Mr. Z" from MW coop missions?
@@callumjones7561 Pretty sure BOCW is in the original canon in between BO1 and BO2
But why didn't he played it himself? I can't see the point. It would be much better that way.
The good ending actually makes sense, Here me out. But in black ops 2(after cold war) we don't see adler or bell during that period and plus even if they survive it would fuck up the story in general
the fact that he said the "bad" ending was perfect.... THANK YOU ... THAT IS THE FACT !
it was heartbreaking killing my old buddy’s
R.I.P
Mason and
Woods
When he said the bad ending was the good one I was mad and sad that he liked woods and mason dying like why bro
u couldve just replayed from last checkpoint instead of reacting
they couldn't because it's canon that woods at least survived the cold war since he appears in Black ops 2
it wouldn't be the main since it would affect black ops 2, so the accurate one is where you die when you try to ambush or the one where you and Adler shoot each other
he angry he didn't blow up europe!?!?
Hello past me, I forgot I watched this video. lol
It was so frustrating seeing you skipping those cutscenes man☹️
It pisses me off that u skipped the cutscenes.
@John Wyatt your insults have degraded down to bed time jokes... wow
Imagine Bell is the Perseus that would be a big twist
The ending you got for me is the best because you and Adler shoot that can lead up to another game which can show a mystery did you survive and plus I just hate when woods die
I Think they should’ve mixed it so Woods, Hudson and Mason go to solvetski to stop the detonation. And Bell, Park and Adler go to Duga to find perseus.
Like "Loose end" mission in MW2, that actually way better
As much as I loved the bad ending we still need a remaster menendez so we can’t let that happen yet
10:15 I flinched when he did this for some reason 😂 because after playing through the first ending, adler betrays us while I was scared that Perseus might do the same 😂
This ending isn't canon because it takes place before black ops 2 which has woods and mason in
OMG Luke...are those D&D books on your right 😮. That’s awesome!!! 😊
Wow I really wanted to see your reaction on this! Keep the great work bro! I am happy I got my free copy for this game from another small giveaway! Very nice!
fun fact: in the bad ending 1, you can kill park, mason and woods by aproaching them and stab them.
That "good" ending (with telling the truth) may not seem like a good ending for the game, but we must admit that Bell/Adler's death was more of a sacrifice to save Europe from destruction.
(Correct me if I'm wrong) Bell was part of the Soviet army and was later taken by the group consisting of Adler and Sims and all that. Bell had the information they needed to kill Perseus - And Bell was originally in Perseus's team, which meant that Adler's group would (probably) betray Bell after Perseus is dead.
So... ye.. you get it.
You either have a choice to either:
come back to the Soviet's team and go home peacefully,
or go against the Soviet's team to save Europe and be later betrayed.
I am glad that you admired the ending with killing Adler.
My dad was a royal marine but he sadly died in service from a taliban sniper
It would be nice if this would be the real ending but in the end woods should come and kill persious saying „you cant kill me“
The first bad ending was the best, my favorite part is when they start the ambush and kill park
The "bad ending v1" is the best of the 3
BAD ENDING: Killing Woods and Mason And that the communists explode Greenlight nuclear bombs across Europe by blaming the US.
6:20 Luke: tHiS iS tHE gOOd eNDiNG
It's just so much more interesting in the context of the game
@@viziontrex Yeah but is still the bad ending
Yeah, Im sure he means story-telling wise its much better. None of us want the good guys to die lol.
“good guys” lmao what a stupid way to view the world black and white, Truman doctrine kicking in
Gotta give treyarch credit for having the balls to create that ending
Better than the Hollywood style other one
Cold War: Has multiple endings you can pick from if you attentive enough
Luke: *picks ending he doesn’t like* This game has a weak ending
Cold War: Has ending Luke likes
Luke: This should have been the ending
Cold War:
It can’t be canon though. I have to agree with Luke though that it would have been better if Bell saying fuck you to Adler and going back to the Soviets but having Mason and Woods escape (with some kind of workaround for the nukes) so it doesn’t fuck up the BO2 storyline was the main “good ending” and then the one where you help Adler and then get iced is just an alternate “bad ending”
9:04
Fun Fact
This big guy is the Stalin's grandson
When will you continue the get fit for the Royal Marines series?
To shut down all of the people saying, the reason why the first ending (good ending) was like that, was because Mason and Woods are in BO2. This game is a reboot, that’s why Imran Zakhaev is in the game. This story is now in the Universe of MW2019.
Happy Thanksgiving
What makes you think that the ending you got was ‘the main ending’? There were literally two choices, you choose one of them, you could have just as easily choose the other one. It was all in your hands.
Yeah also I think it just not right to call this call of duty mediocre because he didn't get the ending in my opinion
Btw the ending you got was focused on the nukes because warzone is 3 years after the story ends and Perseus is still involved
*Good Ending:Leads to MW 2019 storyline*
*Lie Ending(Bell dying and the nukes drop but with adler's team surviving) leads to BO2, BO3, BO4*
Why did you skip the cutscenes lmao bruh they were important
@John Wyatt I didnt say I felt any type of way I was just asking why he skipped them lol
6:51 - Hey, Luke. Don't forget that If the bad ending was the main ending of cold war, then Black Ops 2 wouldn't make sense.
Since Mason would be dead, so his son wouldn't be born. And woods. Hudson would be the only one that survived if the bad ending was the main ending with Half Of Europe crawling up USA's ass trying to kill them. So, yeah. That's all I wanted to say.
EDIT: OH never mind, I heard you say that in the video.
Perseus look like shepherd lmao
Using MrDalekJD video and giving him a shout-out. Oof, didn't really close with the community, eh Luke?
Ikr lol I can already see people saying no I don't think I will
If anyone played infinte warfare, the main character (who you play) actually ends up dying
Happy thanksgiving to all of you and stay safe
you have so much joyyy 0:00 puts a smile on my face
I love the clips from people 360 noscoping mason and woods, bell remembered who he/she was: a pro cod player with max sensibility settings lol.
6:14
Yes, Soviet Union ending is better Komrade
@Diego Alejandro Gonz�lez Garza wdym?
Killing innocent people in Europe? 🙄
@@Spextre07 with American "defensive" nukes on their allies' land, without their allies knowing it...
@@Spextre07 ist just game, calm down
@Diego Alejandro Gonz�lez Garza Eh dc tbh, both of them sounds better
Love your content, huge fan.❤️❤️
The issue with the bad ending is black ops 2 and 3 are still cannon but mainly 2 is the important one since mason and woods are still alive in black ops 2 so killing them wouldn’t work since it’s a prequel, they could have made a bad ending where park, Lazar, and Adler all live then die in the ambush and woods and mason find out later and set up another game to hunt down Perseus and Bell
SOVIET Ending is true ending! Also, they could have made this a different timeline but they decided for some reason to add it on top the existing timeline.
Почему вы товарищ на Английском пишите? Вы что совсем не наш что ли?
@@pythagor47 Because he’s not actually Russian, he just desperately wants to be
The "bad ending" is the worst Imo, Watching Mason Woods & Park/Lazar was painful, I loved Adler he is maybe my favorite character out of all COD behind Reznov, he was so much LIKE a CIA , not Hudson that doesn't want to face his decision, Adler was hella badass, I totally understand ppl getting pissed at him bc he shots Bell in the "good" ending" but its what he had to do. I hope we see him in other COD.
They can't kill off all their main characters and then start a nuclear apocalypse as the main ending lol
That’s flawed considering nukes didn’t go off in bo2.
The cover art for cold War makes a lot more sense now
Right
Let’s think about it, Adler was never seen at all in Black Ops 2, in the past missions, Mason Woods had a good connection with Adler, clearly. So my guess is that both Bell and Adler shot each other since Bell nor Adler is mentioned in Black Ops 2, (just a rumour, don’t get toxic etc.)
Luke: watches Park literally die.
also Luke: ThIs Is A gOoD eNDInG
Yea, the fact that you have the option to turn on them all in bloody revenge is amazing!
I took 2 things from this video, 1, you don’t understand cod and cod cannon, 2nd you skip cutscenes so you dont know what is even going on
Ah you’re so smart you should give yourself a little pat on the back you deserve it.
Luke saying that this should have been the only ending is like saying there should only be one flavor of ice cream, they gave you two endings and a choice so that those who don't like this ending or wanted to be a good guy could choose the opposite ending and those who wanted to be the bad guy could choose the other ending that's the whole point there's an option for you to make so you can't judge them for not making this one the only ending because it would just make people more disappointed if they didn't have one
*Bell get a scoped ak and starts killing former teammates*
Luke: This is a good ending
If this guy played bo1 he wouldn't like the bad ending.
Adler can't let a ex perususe live knowing what bell knows and end up coming back for revenge that's why he chose to kill bell rather then keep him alive.
Two things, both endings are the main ending. If you choose to lie, that's the main ending but if you choose to be honest, that's also the main ending. Also if you think back to the arash shooting you scene at the airstrip, if you choose to be honest he was actually jealous of how far you are in perseus' ranks but if you choose to lie, it was all a ploy to leave you there and hope that the americans find you
I like the comrade ending
None of the bad endings would make sense because the multiplayer storyline is after the campaign and Adler is a playable so is Park so both of them have to live no matter what
The reason they didn’t do the second ending as the Cannon ending is because all of our main characters die in it
I agree with you on the bad ending where you kill Adler. It would've been great if Woods and Mason escaped in that one though. See in the good ending, it makes sense that CIA wanted to take down any liabilities, but I believe game devs could've made the direction better, I mean in the whole game you're tracking down this person named perseus ( one person according to CIA) but in the good ending you didn't even see that guy at all. You simply save the day and then Adler finishes you, everything builds up so much then simply goes down.
Whereas the bad ending where you kill everyone is a kind of ending that leaves you with wow and lives up the standards set by BO1 and BO2, though it isn't canon..
But it’s connected to mw 2019 so there would be no London bc is bombed Europe and clean house is in London