@@pipercharms7374 she does idiot 😂🤦♂️ unofficial power is always more more powerful than actual power , she's part of the elite and can get away with anything if she wanted too she could kill someone and she won't get in trouble only reason why she doesn't is because of the internet the governments of the world will always be more complicated than your little narrow mind
@@thomasabley8597 The Magna Carta (“Great Charter”) is a document guaranteeing English political liberties that was drafted at Runnymede, a meadow by the River Thames, and signed by King John on June 15, 1215, under pressure from his rebellious barons... It is the great egalitarian legacy of Magna Carta, that all are equal under the law, and all can be held to account. It is that idea that gave birth to so many of our rights and freedoms, to parliamentary democracy, fair trial, and a series of controls on the abuse of arbitrary power... In its 39th Chapter, Magna Carta states: “No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or diseised [dispossessed], or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way destroyed, nor will we go against him, nor will we send against him, save by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the land.” Chapter 40 states, concisely, another powerful principle: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay, right or justice.” ... Yet Magna Carta is not a democratic document. Although it established the requirement of common consent to taxation, that consent was to be obtained from an assembly of earls, barons, bishops, and abbots - in the age of chivalry, not even knights were invited to participate... There is nothing in Magna Carta that prevents the enactment and enforcement of unjust laws; but it does elevate the law above the ruler’s will. Unfortunately, that idea still is not accepted in many countries. Moreover, as the continued existence of the US prison camp at Guantánamo Bay shows, even among countries that trace their political institutions to Magna Carta, perceived security threats have weakened the requirement that no one be arrested except under the law of the land, and that justice not be delayed.
@@thomasabley8597 It seems the Magna Carta limits the authority of king or queen but doesn’t address how the law of the land applies to the sovereign .. Although civil and criminal proceedings cannot be taken against the Sovereign as a person under UK law, The Queen is careful to ensure that all her activities in her personal capacity are carried out in strict accordance with the law.
I'm pretty sure when I got citizenship I made an oath to be loyal to the queen. It may not be formally written anywhere, but the monarchy probably has most of the power
Yes you did. As do all of the police and military. All oaths are made to the Monarch not our politicians. To her personally - but critically it what she represents. Something much more than the daily squabbles that politics brings..
Regarding the last part, she denied Royal Consent on the advice of her Prime Minister. It’s a principle in constitutional monarchies that when the monarch acts on formal advice of her ministers, the responsibility falls on the ministers. In modern constitutional monarchies (and there are a few of them: Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Japan, Malaysia, etc), the monarchs act more as safeguards of constitutional rights and as “influencers” (for instance the Queen publicly took vaccinations for Covid to help influence citizens to comply).
With impunity The monarchy powers are boundless. Canada and Australia are still monarchy controlled. The monarchy did fire a Australian pm and allowed a losing party to form government in UK. The British are subjects and not free citizens. Even India and America have citizens not subjects. Look at the globe. Canada has a viceroy till this day. Australia has a viceroy. The queen had a a royal council or similar title. The parliament CANNOT request any information or question any royal decree.
Thank you off grid It seems many UK SUBJECTS still consider themselves citizens same goes for Australians and Canadians who are subjects and not citizens. The governor general is appointed by the monarch and can sack the pm but pm can not sack the monarch or change any laws without monarch's approval. It seems they still think monarchy is some sort of circus 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Even former colonies like India have citizens but Britishers are subjects. They have been brainwashed into this strange way of thinking. UK is absolute monarchy even fish and birds are owned by the monarch. Land of free home of the brave god bless America.
@@binder946 You might to educate in constitutional law before making look like a dick in front of everyone, but that’s the internet for you. Besides, sounds like you need to learn about other things before you learn about Law. Just stick to your little bubble, might save yourself from cognitive dissonance. Muted.
@Wo W she is not the Queen of Canada or even Australia she her Majesty is the head of state of the country in my knowledge of Canada Australia and New Zealand and those are the ones that I can think of off the top my head
Well you forget to mention that she technically is the commander and chief of Canada’s navy and armed forces as well as Australia and the United Kingdom. Listen… the queen allows all this to go on in the background. But if she wanted to use these powers she could. People are so blind . You have to read the little details
That's not how it works. The royalty's a figurehead with no actual power. If they tried to order troops around, the army would just refuse, kick it up the chain of command and the royal would get a polite conversation from a Prime Minister. If they keep it up or if it's egregious enough, they might get deposed. They basically only have the power as long as they don't use it. Belgium's former king refused to sign an abortion law, meaning it couldn't become official. They dethroned him, signed the law themselves, and made him king again the day after with the understanding that if he tried again, he'd be dethroned for good. Royals have a lot of soft power, wielding a lot of influence and being involved in a lot of things, but they don't directly affect anything.
Grabbing and snatching is definitely not as bad as begging, if you want something, go get it. Not get on your knees and beg. Besides the queen has never colonised a nation, only given nations independence.
@@tomblack4634 The Queen did colonize Canada through what is known as the Treaties of Canada with the many different nations of Indigenous peoples who called Canada "Turtle Island" before she proclaimed it to be called Canada instead.
@@NorthCamZ Commonwealth and Commonwealth realm countries are two different groups. India joins Commonwealth not Commonwealth realms. Please Google on Commonwealth realm countries. India head of state is their president, where as Australia head of state is Queen.
The Crown is head of the Biggest Military to date, the British Empire still stands. Just cause the power has not been used as such for around 300 years, the crown has the most power of earth. The Crown is more then just a figurehead.
Well the times have changed and England stand nowhere in case of power us , russia, china , india are at top in case of military And yes india is not a part of Britain now And the proof is I'm an Indian and I can write fuck the queen of uk in my social status bio and you guys can't do anything about it Sorry for bad language but it's important and stop living in past
Why Do Canadians and British like someone as Queen, above them and believe that she must be respected irrespective of anything? A person should be respected by her virtues and not by birth. What good has Queen Elizabeth done to Canadians and British citizens?
@OwnOwnOwnOwnOwnOwn Please list here, the good things Queen Elizabeth has done for Canada. Otherwise, I know who is stupid. I am sure, there must be some reason you said, what you said.
@@stannisstewart4879 Below website says Queen Elizabeth presides over the Prime minister of Canada. The Canadian citizenship test says that Queen Elizabeth is above constitution. www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/crown-canada/about.html
Ravi Sanghvi these countries don’t have codified constitution just a collection of documents some have historical relevant to royalty i’m of the opinion your looking in the wrong place for dictators
The map was showed in this video shows the Commonwealth but not all of them sees HMQ as their head of state. She is head of the Commonwealth as a group, and head of state to the Commonwealth Realms
Does this bloke realize, everyone in all the armed forces that still have the Queen as head of state, swore an allegiance to the Queen. She’s got power over, Australia’s military, Britain’s military, Canada’s military, New Zealand’s military and those are just the big countries. Everyone one in the armed forces would have to do what ever the queen wants them to do. How are people so ignorant
You really think that oath matters if they had a choice between protecting their country or the queen? Obviously they'd choose their country. If she really had complete power over their military and could actually use that power, do you really think these countries would still be in the commonwealth or recognise her as head of state? She is ceremonial, nothing more. If countries somehow had to pick between listerning their goverments or our queen, they'd all clearly pick their goverments.
You are right British have been fed propaganda that they are citizens when infact they are subjects. India America France and even black Africans are free citizens but British are subjects. The oath is to the monarch. Monarchy can dissolve parliament. But parliament cannot dissolve the monarchy. Monarchy can appoint the pm. Pm cannot appoint the monarch. Monarch can refuse to accept any law passed by parliament. But parliament CANNOT refuse any law passed by monarch. The monarchy is the highest military office in the kingdom not parliament. The monarch is the highest legal/judicial office in the monarchy. British people are subjects who have been mislead. That is why there is no written formal constitution in UK.
You are right British have been fed propaganda that they are citizens when infact they are subjects. India America France and even black Africans are free citizens but British are subjects. The oath is to the monarch. Monarchy can dissolve parliament. But parliament cannot dissolve the monarchy. Monarchy can appoint the pm. Pm cannot appoint the monarch. Monarch can refuse to accept any law passed by parliament. But parliament CANNOT refuse any law passed by monarch. The monarchy is the highest military office in the kingdom not parliament. The monarch is the highest legal/judicial office in the monarchy. British people are subjects who have been mislead. That is why there is no written formal constitution in UK.
@@desireandfire You won't see the respect shown to the Queen for any politian. The queues are full of people from every back ground. Why a few people want to destroy one of the few sources of unity is beyond me. If it disappeared tommorow would things be better - no.
Explain how she has the power to dismiss the prime minister and his or her cabinet when they are behaving unconstitutionally..would be according to the 1867 British North American Act of course. At least where Canada is concerned. Some say her authority is only ceremonial but the Royals say this is one power that is not ceremonial. As the Queen of Canada she has a responsibility to uphold the constitution is the kingdom of Canada. As well as her other kingdoms. Please check this.
She's the commander in chief of the canadian military that's how. They swear their loyalty to her when they join, so regardless of the laws, their allegience is to her. Whether or not they honor it, is up to them.
@@MazdaRX7007 she has, by virtue of the keeper of the Constitution, to never act in a way that subverts the Constitution. Every crown agency must pledge allegiance to the Queen, who had pledged to uphold the Constitution. It's implied that the Queen always acts in a way that upholds the Constitution. So pledging allegiance to the Queen, means, by virtue, the Constitution. This is our right.
You may want to read up on it, it's got everything to do with your constitution and also with the style of your parliament. The sovereign of Canada (King Charles III) Can dissolve the house of commons but not the senate. On the advice of your governor general whom acts as the sovereign while His Majesty is in the United Kingdom Your constitution states the exact power your governor general holds on behalf of the sovereign. Your constitution states the following; "In Canada, executive authority is formally vested in the Crown (the Sovereign), and it is exercised in its name by the Governor General, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister and the cabinet. The Constitution reserves certain prerogatives of government for the Crown, including the powers to: give royal recommendation to bills that propose to spend government revenues; give royal assent to bill passed by the Senate and the House of Commons so that they become law; appoint holders of many important offices (e.g., judicial and diplomatic); dissolve Parliament before elections, and to open and close parliamentary sessions (at the beginning of each parliamentary session, the Governor General reads the Speech from the Throne, prepared by the Prime Minister, outlining the Government’s objectives for the upcoming session); and choose the Prime Minister (by convention, the leader of the party with the most seats in the House of Commons following a general election). The Governor General is appointed by the King on the recommendation of the Prime Minister for a tenure of usually five years which may be extended at the discretion of the Sovereign. As the Sovereign’s representative, the Governor General is the Commander-in-Chief of the Canadian Armed Forces, performs several ceremonial functions, and represents Canada in state visits and in other international events." Your constitution was written mostly by the United Kingdom🇬🇧. There are parts of the Canadian constitution that wad written only by the parliament of the United Kingdom and Canada isn't allowed to add or remove to that section of the constitution.
Actually, the monarch can formally declare war, or peace dissolve paliment, call for new elections.and can actually refuse to recognoze the election of a prime minister. This no mere formality.
@@TheOnlyOneSpeedfreak being a common wealth nation is different from being a common wealth realm. India is a common wealth nation not a realm. So Queen is not the head of state in India
Indians and India does not recognize her as their Queen. She is not having the same status in India as she has in Australia , canada and New Zealand. The owner of the land in India (either official or symbolic)is the government and public of india
@@KingDomsKingdom85 better than being used as cannon fodder for empire wars and certainly better than dying of famine because their farmlands had been confiscated for cash crops.
Wrong map of queen's land ownership. You have shown India and Pakistan in it. Don't forget India is a democratic Republic and we have our own elected President not queen. India is not owned by your queen.
I am not sure if this video is factual or if the narrator was being sarcastic. I can tell you that as a Sri Lankan we became a republic in 1972 thus ending dominion status. Hence the British Royalty does not technically own the land. This is true for many South Asian countries.
Hoooooow mmuuuuuuuuchh pooooooower doooooooooes theeeeeee quuuuuuuuuuen acttttuuuuuualy haaaaaaaave. Iike watching in slow mo. Thank god you can speed videos up
The English crown is dozed in the blood 🩸 of my Indian ancestors, several millions killed. The crown is dozed in the blood 🩸 of African people which far exceeds that of the Indians and subjugated to more brutality than my Indian ancestors.
No, she can’t do that. A line of succession is clear and cannot be changed unless the Crown Prince gives it up. The King has no intention of abdicating. So no.
They play the nutcracker music because she is one😂 Yes the Crown is a noble cause for tradition but completely outdated as she has affected politics as late as 1999! Perhaps make them like the Japanese Royal family which amounts to kabuki theatre.
Please explain how the hell someone could mistake the word "wolf" with the word wuff/woof. Please explain why people say WUFF instead of the correct pronunciation WOLF.
@Monica Klapp literally is funded only 60 million a year and is a cultural figurehead, the pope has his own country and is a lot richer, should we remove him?
Real kings and queens with power have to use it to keep it, she has implied powers, everyone agreed long ago that she is the queen and has powers, but nobody takes it seriously because she hasnt practice her powers. And that creates a lack of confidence of her powers, in the old days it would be seen as weakness and would of been challenged for the throne, such spoiled monarchy now a days.
She owns them and if she wants she can fire their Prime minister and Dissolve their Parliament like back in 1975 when a British Governor Fired the Australian PM
@@YourMum44056 No She reigned over only 15 Commonwealth countries known as the Realms of the Monarch . Other Commonwealth countries are either Republics or Have their own monarchs reigning over them .
Pretty sure they can give life imprisonment for it, and i also think that Swans can carry the same penalty... but im not certain. I just know swans have something to do with ol' queeny.
You realise you've used a map of the whole Commonwealth, not the Commonwealth Realms where she is head of state? We aren't living in the days of the height of the British Empire (sadly).
The Queen does own certain countries but the royal family did this in a clever way. She owns but does not rule for she gives consent to rule to a governing body through a constitution made with her royal consent. For example, In Canada there was the British North America Act of 1867 but things took too long to get done so the governing body in Canada requested from the Queen a faster means to get things done and so she passed royal consent for the Canadian Constitution Act of 1982 which helped greatly because now Canada didn't have to wait for the government in Britain to get things done for them and Canada itself could now make laws and decisions by themselves, however, certains things still need royal consent but are few.
@@tomblack4634 She does own them but the royal family did this in a clever way. She owns but does not rule for she gives consent to rule to a governing body through a constitution made with her royal consent. The first was the British North America Act of 1867 but things took too long to get done so the governing body in Canada requested from the Queen a faster means to get things done and so she passed royal consent for the Canadian Constitution Act of 1982 which helped greatly because now Canada didn't have to wait for the government in Britain to get things done for them and Canada itself could now make laws and decisions by themselves, however, certains things still need royal consent but are few.
So ur obviously stupid, 1 England is not the UK the UK is made up of 4 different countries, 2 she is legally the queen of the UK Canada Australia and the coman wealth, 3 she is the most influential and powerful women ever, possibly a little less than queen Victoria, and finally but not least every ,pope ,president ,king ,prime minister, ir head of state calls her the queen and she is the most recognizable person in the world other than religious entities such as God/Allah jesus or Muhammad, your plain wrong, ignorant and stupid
you realize that someone is powerful, when he has so much respect that he doesn't need to move a finger, because nobody dares to do something wrong.
Yeah Sycophants kneel for her
'riding a horse at her age', well thats real power right there LOL
No that's kids
She has much more power than this.
This is very true
How? She doesn't actually
True...she has a lot more power than this video shows 😂😂😂
Piper charms she does
@@pipercharms7374 she does idiot 😂🤦♂️ unofficial power is always more more powerful than actual power , she's part of the elite and can get away with anything if she wanted too she could kill someone and she won't get in trouble only reason why she doesn't is because of the internet the governments of the world will always be more complicated than your little narrow mind
She is above the law ... that s pretty OP
She isn't, the Magna Carta made sure of that lmao
@@thomasabley8597 The Magna Carta (“Great Charter”) is a document guaranteeing English political liberties that was drafted at Runnymede, a meadow by the River Thames, and signed by King John on June 15, 1215, under pressure from his rebellious barons... It is the great egalitarian legacy of Magna Carta, that all are equal under the law, and all can be held to account. It is that idea that gave birth to so many of our rights and freedoms, to parliamentary democracy, fair trial, and a series of controls on the abuse of arbitrary power... In its 39th Chapter, Magna Carta states: “No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or diseised [dispossessed], or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way destroyed, nor will we go against him, nor will we send against him, save by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the land.” Chapter 40 states, concisely, another powerful principle: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay, right or justice.” ... Yet Magna Carta is not a democratic document. Although it established the requirement of common consent to taxation, that consent was to be obtained from an assembly of earls, barons, bishops, and abbots - in the age of chivalry, not even knights were invited to participate... There is nothing in Magna Carta that prevents the enactment and enforcement of unjust laws; but it does elevate the law above the ruler’s will. Unfortunately, that idea still is not accepted in many countries. Moreover, as the continued existence of the US prison camp at Guantánamo Bay shows, even among countries that trace their political institutions to Magna Carta, perceived security threats have weakened the requirement that no one be arrested except under the law of the land, and that justice not be delayed.
@@thomasabley8597 It seems the Magna Carta limits the authority of king or queen but doesn’t address how the law of the land applies to the sovereign .. Although civil and criminal proceedings cannot be taken against the Sovereign as a person under UK law, The Queen is careful to ensure that all her activities in her personal capacity are carried out in strict accordance with the law.
She is not above the law She is the LAW
@@bastabey2652 Yeah. Habeas Corpus
Very well written btw.
Saved me a job.
I'm pretty sure when I got citizenship I made an oath to be loyal to the queen. It may not be formally written anywhere, but the monarchy probably has most of the power
Yes you did. As do all of the police and military. All oaths are made to the Monarch not our politicians. To her personally - but critically it what she represents. Something much more than the daily squabbles that politics brings..
it's only formal, for the show so to say
@@KR-us9pj
In America the queen and king of England don't mean s***.
That's the good part of America freedom from England.
Who's with me.
@@KR-us9pj
So f*** the king and queen of England
America f*** yeah kicking ass wherever we go.
@@abrahammanders8851 Tumbleweeds. Not too many followers yet Abraham.....
Regarding the last part, she denied Royal Consent on the advice of her Prime Minister. It’s a principle in constitutional monarchies that when the monarch acts on formal advice of her ministers, the responsibility falls on the ministers. In modern constitutional monarchies (and there are a few of them: Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Japan, Malaysia, etc), the monarchs act more as safeguards of constitutional rights and as “influencers” (for instance the Queen publicly took vaccinations for Covid to help influence citizens to comply).
He tried the entire video to downplay the Queens power but come on she has A LOT
The crown rules absolute. They "play" the role of siting on the sidelines but at any time the crown can do whatever they want without impunity.
With impunity
The monarchy powers are boundless. Canada and Australia are still monarchy controlled.
The monarchy did fire a Australian pm and allowed a losing party to form government in UK.
The British are subjects and not free citizens. Even India and America have citizens not subjects. Look at the globe. Canada has a viceroy till this day. Australia has a viceroy. The queen had a a royal council or similar title.
The parliament CANNOT request any information or question any royal decree.
@@binder946 No you’re wrong. The monarchy is not boundless and the Queen did not sack the Australian prime minister. That was the Governor-General.
Thank you off grid
It seems many UK SUBJECTS still consider themselves citizens same goes for Australians and Canadians who are subjects and not citizens.
The governor general is appointed by the monarch and can sack the pm but pm can not sack the monarch or change any laws without monarch's approval.
It seems they still think monarchy is some sort of circus 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Even former colonies like India have citizens but Britishers are subjects.
They have been brainwashed into this strange way of thinking.
UK is absolute monarchy even fish and birds are owned by the monarch.
Land of free home of the brave god bless America.
@@ImperialKnight86 th-cam.com/video/fd6bYq8O5P8/w-d-xo.html
@@binder946 You might to educate in constitutional law before making look like a dick in front of everyone, but that’s the internet for you. Besides, sounds like you need to learn about other things before you learn about Law. Just stick to your little bubble, might save yourself from cognitive dissonance. Muted.
Why did the map show India??? India abolished Monarchy in 1950
Its part of the commonwealth
@Bryan nice joke but you know we don’t give a shit
@Bryan u don’t know lol... the pm of India only signed it for unity, Indian constitution is sovereign
Yes signing commonwealth does not take away our sovereignty even a lil bit
@Wo W she is not the Queen of Canada or even Australia she her Majesty is the head of state of the country in my knowledge of Canada Australia and New Zealand and those are the ones that I can think of off the top my head
She's more powerful. The Queen's a vampire 😂
Well you forget to mention that she technically is the commander and chief of Canada’s navy and armed forces as well as Australia and the United Kingdom. Listen… the queen allows all this to go on in the background. But if she wanted to use these powers she could. People are so blind . You have to read the little details
well now Charles has the power now and his more politicaly minded than his mother hope he shows restraint though.
That's not how it works. The royalty's a figurehead with no actual power. If they tried to order troops around, the army would just refuse, kick it up the chain of command and the royal would get a polite conversation from a Prime Minister. If they keep it up or if it's egregious enough, they might get deposed. They basically only have the power as long as they don't use it.
Belgium's former king refused to sign an abortion law, meaning it couldn't become official. They dethroned him, signed the law themselves, and made him king again the day after with the understanding that if he tried again, he'd be dethroned for good.
Royals have a lot of soft power, wielding a lot of influence and being involved in a lot of things, but they don't directly affect anything.
She dose not own a single inch on my country India . As shown in the beginning of this video
British empire, the icon of grabbing and snatching. Worse than begging. Yet, self proclaimed, the royal highness.
Grabbing and snatching is definitely not as bad as begging, if you want something, go get it. Not get on your knees and beg. Besides the queen has never colonised a nation, only given nations independence.
@@tomblack4634 The Queen did colonize Canada through what is known as the Treaties of Canada with the many different nations of Indigenous peoples who called Canada "Turtle Island" before she proclaimed it to be called Canada instead.
Как хорошо что в Англии есть олицетворение надёжности -ЕЕ Величество!
I have a question. Why is there Christmas music playing ?
To piss off cromwell.
@@tomblack4634 who?
@@VejmR oliver cromwell
FYI
"In the know " india is not part of her wealth or property as you say.
They joined the commonwealth a few years after leaving lmao
@@NorthCamZ India is republic not Commonwealth
@@saurabhkanswal7954 Nope india rejoined the commonwealth shortly after leaving. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_states_of_the_Commonwealth_of_Nations
@@NorthCamZ Commonwealth and Commonwealth realm countries are two different groups. India joins Commonwealth not Commonwealth realms.
Please Google on Commonwealth realm countries. India head of state is their president, where as Australia head of state is Queen.
technically Queen Elizabeth is still head of state in India.
She gave pardon to the guy who didn't really crack the enigma code
She is the largest land owner due to the English tax payers 😂
Thats good
she should be
This is out of date. The guardian revealed some interesting, hitherto hidden details about the queens real powaaaa
The Crown is head of the Biggest Military to date, the British Empire still stands.
Just cause the power has not been used as such for around 300 years, the crown has the most power of earth.
The Crown is more then just a figurehead.
Well the times have changed and England stand nowhere in case of power us , russia, china , india are at top in case of military
And yes india is not a part of Britain now
And the proof is I'm an Indian and I can write fuck the queen of uk in my social status bio and you guys can't do anything about it
Sorry for bad language but it's important and stop living in past
yea maybe 200 years ago. now the US, Russia, China and maybe India have stronger armys
@@blueciffer1653 England controls Indians army
@Zion Lamar lmao wtf I ain’t British I better shit to do all day then sit and drink tea and praise a group of incest loving people
Why Do Canadians and British like someone as Queen, above them and believe that she must be respected irrespective of anything?
A person should be respected by her virtues and not by birth.
What good has Queen Elizabeth done to Canadians and British citizens?
@OwnOwnOwnOwnOwnOwn Please list here, the good things Queen Elizabeth has done for Canada.
Otherwise, I know who is stupid.
I am sure, there must be some reason you said, what you said.
@OwnOwnOwnOwnOwnOwn So I am assuming that you have no answer regarding why you were licking Queen Elizabeth's Ass.
it’s not that serious she acts as a cultural icon one that’s family is historically important.
@@stannisstewart4879 Below website says Queen Elizabeth presides over the Prime minister of Canada.
The Canadian citizenship test says that Queen Elizabeth is above constitution.
www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/crown-canada/about.html
Ravi Sanghvi these countries don’t have codified constitution just a collection of documents some have historical relevant to royalty i’m of the opinion your looking in the wrong place for dictators
The Queen did actually refuse to sign a law.
If the queen or king really wanted too, they could dissolve the parliament with the backing of the military.
True but who would support them after that
@@ObaidFaisal Techically it wouldn't matter, they're the king and queen.
I'm not saying it's good, I'm just saying they could.
The map was showed in this video shows the Commonwealth but not all of them sees HMQ as their head of state. She is head of the Commonwealth as a group, and head of state to the Commonwealth Realms
Right . She was the sovereign of only 15 countries. Rest countries of the Commonwealth are either republics or have their own monarch .
And I don't get why there is Indian subcontinent, South Africa etc. They are Independant nations that were colonised previously.
Thanks bro
Ireland is not part of the UK.
Good
She owns America
wat
You forgot that she has the power, to make Lady Diana's murder look like an accident.
She doesn’t own a single inch of India... correct your facts... India is a complete independent state. India is not like Australia or Canada.
India is trash
Yes india isnt like australia or canada because india is trash shithole
India is shit
Bara e naam own krti he bss yani kehne ki bath he warna takke ki hesiyat nhe queen ki
She can still own land their without being the sovereign
Bet there’s gonna be a king one day that gonna take all the power like Henry the eight
So basically the English crown actually has real power, if the the Monarch chooses to do so.
She only has power if the people are behind her. Anything else would start a rebellion
Queen I want, Grant Works.
Thanks
Does this bloke realize, everyone in all the armed forces that still have the Queen as head of state, swore an allegiance to the Queen. She’s got power over, Australia’s military, Britain’s military, Canada’s military, New Zealand’s military and those are just the big countries. Everyone one in the armed forces would have to do what ever the queen wants them to do. How are people so ignorant
You really think that oath matters if they had a choice between protecting their country or the queen? Obviously they'd choose their country. If she really had complete power over their military and could actually use that power, do you really think these countries would still be in the commonwealth or recognise her as head of state? She is ceremonial, nothing more. If countries somehow had to pick between listerning their goverments or our queen, they'd all clearly pick their goverments.
@@pipercharms7374 youd be surprised
Legally high treason has a max term of life imprison
You are right British have been fed propaganda that they are citizens when infact they are subjects. India America France and even black Africans are free citizens but British are subjects.
The oath is to the monarch.
Monarchy can dissolve parliament. But parliament cannot dissolve the monarchy.
Monarchy can appoint the pm. Pm cannot appoint the monarch.
Monarch can refuse to accept any law passed by parliament. But parliament CANNOT refuse any law passed by monarch.
The monarchy is the highest military office in the kingdom not parliament.
The monarch is the highest legal/judicial office in the monarchy.
British people are subjects who have been mislead. That is why there is no written formal constitution in UK.
You are right British have been fed propaganda that they are citizens when infact they are subjects. India America France and even black Africans are free citizens but British are subjects.
The oath is to the monarch.
Monarchy can dissolve parliament. But parliament cannot dissolve the monarchy.
Monarchy can appoint the pm. Pm cannot appoint the monarch.
Monarch can refuse to accept any law passed by parliament. But parliament CANNOT refuse any law passed by monarch.
The monarchy is the highest military office in the kingdom not parliament.
The monarch is the highest legal/judicial office in the monarchy.
British people are subjects who have been mislead. That is why there is no written formal constitution in UK.
Trust an American to manage to fuck up on how much power she has xD
Shes alot more powerful than this guy can even imagine lol.
No she's not and india don't come under British now 😂
India in no more Queen land, kindly have knowledge and explain it!!
Im so glad I put it on 2x
Informative, but why screw it up with placing a crown on presenter's head?
Very special LADY THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR SHERING VIDEO.
Can she overturn any decision that the parliament makes too?🤔
She does not own India's land... Redeem this video and upload the correct one
Her power comes from the respect, loyalty and love people have for her - and what she represents. Politics by its nature divides, the monarchy unites.
The monarchy is literally a political system
@@desireandfire You won't see the respect shown to the Queen for any politian. The queues are full of people from every back ground. Why a few people want to destroy one of the few sources of unity is beyond me. If it disappeared tommorow would things be better - no.
🤟thanks brother
Hello friend how are you doing is like you really love the queen lol. Nice to meet you where are you from❤❤
Explain how she has the power to dismiss the prime minister and his or her cabinet when they are behaving unconstitutionally..would be according to the 1867 British North American Act of course.
At least where Canada is concerned.
Some say her authority is only ceremonial but the Royals say this is one power that is not ceremonial.
As the Queen of Canada she has a responsibility to uphold the constitution is the kingdom of Canada. As well as her other kingdoms.
Please check this.
She's the commander in chief of the canadian military that's how. They swear their loyalty to her when they join, so regardless of the laws, their allegience is to her. Whether or not they honor it, is up to them.
@@MazdaRX7007 she has, by virtue of the keeper of the Constitution, to never act in a way that subverts the Constitution. Every crown agency must pledge allegiance to the Queen, who had pledged to uphold the Constitution. It's implied that the Queen always acts in a way that upholds the Constitution. So pledging allegiance to the Queen, means, by virtue, the Constitution. This is our right.
You may want to read up on it, it's got everything to do with your constitution and also with the style of your parliament.
The sovereign of Canada (King Charles III) Can dissolve the house of commons but not the senate.
On the advice of your governor general whom acts as the sovereign while His Majesty is in the United Kingdom
Your constitution states the exact power your governor general holds on behalf of the sovereign. Your constitution states the following;
"In Canada, executive authority is formally vested in the Crown (the Sovereign), and it is exercised in its name by the Governor General, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister and the cabinet. The Constitution reserves certain prerogatives of government for the Crown, including the powers to:
give royal recommendation to bills that propose to spend government revenues;
give royal assent to bill passed by the Senate and the House of Commons so that they become law;
appoint holders of many important offices (e.g., judicial and diplomatic);
dissolve Parliament before elections, and to open and close parliamentary sessions (at the beginning of each parliamentary session, the Governor General reads the Speech from the Throne, prepared by the Prime Minister, outlining the Government’s objectives for the upcoming session); and
choose the Prime Minister (by convention, the leader of the party with the most seats in the House of Commons following a general election).
The Governor General is appointed by the King on the recommendation of the Prime Minister for a tenure of usually five years which may be extended at the discretion of the Sovereign. As the Sovereign’s representative, the Governor General is the Commander-in-Chief of the Canadian Armed Forces, performs several ceremonial functions, and represents Canada in state visits and in other international events."
Your constitution was written mostly by the United Kingdom🇬🇧.
There are parts of the Canadian constitution that wad written only by the parliament of the United Kingdom and Canada isn't allowed to add or remove to that section of the constitution.
Witchcraft ,knowing the planetary alignments and how to use them ,as well as how to work those Solomon keys that’s how
Based
Actually, the monarch can formally declare war, or peace dissolve paliment, call for new elections.and can actually refuse to recognoze the election of a prime minister. This no mere formality.
If it’s not absolute it’s not enough
wat
the best queens come from africa
India is not included. Check your facts.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations
@@TheOnlyOneSpeedfreak being a common wealth nation is different from being a common wealth realm. India is a common wealth nation not a realm. So Queen is not the head of state in India
@@veena1409 indirectly it comes under queen regimes.
Say for commonwealth games, commonwealth scholarship etc.
India still have all these benefits
@Wo W don't compare UK and India, they're far different in all aspect, with all due respect. Lol
@Wo W the armed forces of UK and 15 Commonwealth realms are all under the command of the Queen, India just have one armed forces.
I'm in Britain aswell which is scary I am scared of the queen
You didn't read up on this subject... at all did you?
He did hes mostly correct and tbh understated her power
This means that UK will be ruled by one family forever. And this are the people who comes to Africa to lecture us about democracy
Indians and India does not recognize her as their Queen. She is not having the same status in India as she has in Australia , canada and New Zealand. The owner of the land in India (either official or symbolic)is the government and public of india
Same for Pakistan. These colonizers be trippin
Also Bangladesh
@@kabz3354 how are things going over there now mate? I presume very well now Britain left you to your country?
@@KingDomsKingdom85 better than being used as cannon fodder for empire wars and certainly better than dying of famine because their farmlands had been confiscated for cash crops.
@@ongeri Indian soldiers volunteered for the army, your point now invalid
Wrong map of queen's land ownership. You have shown India and Pakistan in it. Don't forget India is a democratic Republic and we have our own elected President not queen. India is not owned by your queen.
I am not sure if this video is factual or if the narrator was being sarcastic. I can tell you that as a Sri Lankan we became a republic in 1972 thus ending dominion status. Hence the British Royalty does not technically own the land. This is true for many South Asian countries.
She don't own all that land.. Her office does
The King acts on the advice of the government.
My man compares Royal family to Kardashian's, lol.
RIP
Hoooooow mmuuuuuuuuchh pooooooower doooooooooes theeeeeee quuuuuuuuuuen acttttuuuuuualy haaaaaaaave. Iike watching in slow mo. Thank god you can speed videos up
How many people on earth pay taxes to her?
Approvaval
Chuc nu hoang Elizabeth 2 khoe manh con nguong mo ba lam
This women IS the most powerfull person of the Planet believe me . England IS the empire of all comewellth.
Democracy forever, monarchy never!
Happy 1776 miss queenie, for a 3rd time
Who came form our 8 class
The English crown is dozed in the blood 🩸 of my Indian ancestors, several millions killed. The crown is dozed in the blood 🩸 of African people which far exceeds that of the Indians and subjugated to more brutality than my Indian ancestors.
Most Afro-Brits and Indo-Brits support and care about Her Majesty and Prince William, though.
@@DavidBustamanteda-bu-sa huh irony
still can’t blame them for the blood of the past (can’t blame the current royal family in something that happened before their time)
Wait she's above the law wattttttttttttttt!!!!
Did you even do your research? Bloody hell
So can she say one day.
You know i want Prince Harry to be king now🤔
I suppose she technically could? 🤷🏻♀️
No, she can’t do that. A line of succession is clear and cannot be changed unless the Crown Prince gives it up. The King has no intention of abdicating. So no.
What's with the Christmas music?
They play the nutcracker music because she is one😂 Yes the Crown is a noble cause for tradition but completely outdated as she has affected politics as late as 1999! Perhaps make them like the Japanese Royal family which amounts to kabuki theatre.
Please explain how the hell someone could mistake the word "wolf" with the word wuff/woof. Please explain why people say WUFF instead of the correct pronunciation WOLF.
Pronunciation differs.
we all love our queenie
@Monica Klapp lol long live the queen
@Monica Klapp literally is funded only 60 million a year and is a cultural figurehead, the pope has his own country and is a lot richer, should we remove him?
The British are subjects not citizens.
Update: not much anymore
Real kings and queens with power have to use it to keep it, she has implied powers, everyone agreed long ago that she is the queen and has powers, but nobody takes it seriously because she hasnt practice her powers. And that creates a lack of confidence of her powers, in the old days it would be seen as weakness and would of been challenged for the throne, such spoiled monarchy now a days.
She exercises her powers in privy councils and this gives the illusion she's nit involved politically.
TryingtoKnow true
In close doors she comands...that why people be mistaken about Her true power
@@hugokloeppel3596 yes . she has privy council. And Trudeau is on her privy council.
HOW ART THOU FALLEN O LUCIFER
Nigeria is not a commonwealth Realm
What? So the queen can actually commit a crime (I'm not saying she does lol) and she has no legal consequences?? 🤔
Pretty much
They're all pedophiles lmao
She owns around 16% of worlds land but how. How independent countries can be owned by her or on her name
She owns them and if she wants she can fire their Prime minister and Dissolve their Parliament like back in 1975 when a British Governor Fired the Australian PM
@@zylnexxd842 She can't do a fuck atleast not in india we have bigger arm forces and weapons than England 😂 and sorry for the disrespectful language
@@Area-lr1mz 1 man with a gun beats 10 men with sticks and rocks, not saying you use sticks btw... just making a point.
@@KingDomsKingdom85 i will give you a time machine
Come back from the past
The Queen's Powers: th-cam.com/video/hTU-9auyxo4/w-d-xo.html
0:08 you are wrong she did not hold that many countries
Dosen’t she hold all commonwealth nations and most royal properties?
@@YourMum44056 No
She reigned over only 15 Commonwealth countries known as the Realms of the Monarch . Other Commonwealth countries are either Republics or Have their own monarchs reigning over them .
why did it show india that is incorrect
when does Elizabeth owned India
Dude why did you say that India is owned by her
He did not say That and he is talking about the Commonwealth because India in the Commonwealth
@@IgirisuGuy Commonwealth is a group of nations which are freed from British Colonialism
@@thealchemist413 your point being?
@@IgirisuGuy That Britain isn't Great Anymore
@@thealchemist413 no one said it was. Great Britain does not mean we are great it is talking about the country’s of Scotland Wales and England.
no power anymore
Nu hoang Elizabeth 2 muon nam
but the queen is still protected by the US, the most powerful country in history
So, if I were to kill a whale within 3 miles of the UK shore could I be charged with destruction of property?
Pretty sure they can give life imprisonment for it, and i also think that Swans can carry the same penalty... but im not certain. I just know swans have something to do with ol' queeny.
@@KingDomsKingdom85 dayum
*had
You realise you've used a map of the whole Commonwealth, not the Commonwealth Realms where she is head of state? We aren't living in the days of the height of the British Empire (sadly).
It's better without them.
@@Euro.Patriot no
@@Euro.Patriot murica
sadly? you guys ruined the damn world.
@@blueciffer1653 *brought civilisation to the world
The Queen does own certain countries but the royal family did this in a clever way. She owns but does not rule for she gives consent to rule to a governing body through a constitution made with her royal consent. For example, In Canada there was the British North America Act of 1867 but things took too long to get done so the governing body in Canada requested from the Queen a faster means to get things done and so she passed royal consent for the Canadian Constitution Act of 1982 which helped greatly because now Canada didn't have to wait for the government in Britain to get things done for them and Canada itself could now make laws and decisions by themselves, however, certains things still need royal consent but are few.
She has power but not strength
Who d fuck said she owns INDIA , u showed INDIA in dat map
Hold on...
She owns all of Australia, Canada, India and South Africa.
and America.
She also makes banks off them 😂 and her net worth is false she has and makes wayyy more
She doesn’t “own” them, she’s just head of state and she isn’t head of state in India or South Africa.
@@tomblack4634 She does own them but the royal family did this in a clever way. She owns but does not rule for she gives consent to rule to a governing body through a constitution made with her royal consent. The first was the British North America Act of 1867 but things took too long to get done so the governing body in Canada requested from the Queen a faster means to get things done and so she passed royal consent for the Canadian Constitution Act of 1982 which helped greatly because now Canada didn't have to wait for the government in Britain to get things done for them and Canada itself could now make laws and decisions by themselves, however, certains things still need royal consent but are few.
Every animal, bird all the fish that swims 3 miles of the shoreline where she is in charge.
maybe explain why you tell people false facts about india
Your video is misleading
English queen not queen of whole world .
So ur obviously stupid, 1 England is not the UK the UK is made up of 4 different countries, 2 she is legally the queen of the UK Canada Australia and the coman wealth, 3 she is the most influential and powerful women ever, possibly a little less than queen Victoria, and finally but not least every ,pope ,president ,king ,prime minister, ir head of state calls her the queen and she is the most recognizable person in the world other than religious entities such as God/Allah jesus or Muhammad, your plain wrong, ignorant and stupid